Next Article in Journal
Targeting the EGFR and Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Pathways in Oral Cancer: A Plausible Alliance to Enhance Cell Death
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Survival Outcome Predictions in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Through PET Radiomics Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Post-Transcriptional Modifications to miRNAs Undergo Widespread Alterations, Creating a Unique Lung Adenocarcinoma IsomiRome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 16
Issue 22
10.3390/cancers16223729
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Profiling Plasma Extracellular Vesicle Metabotypes and miRNAs: An Unobserved Clue for Predicting Relapse in Patients with Early-Stage NSCLC

by
Vivi Bafiti
1,
Eleni Thanou
2,
Sotiris Ouzounis
1,
Athanasios Kotsakis
3,
Vasilis Georgoulias
4,
Evi Lianidou
2,
Theodora Katsila
1,* and
Athina Markou
2,*
1
Institute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 11635 Athens, Greece
2
Lab of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece
3
Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Larissa, 41334 Larissa, Greece
4
First Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan General Hospital of Athens, 15562 Cholargos, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2024, 16(22), 3729; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16223729
Submission received: 13 September 2024 / Revised: 31 October 2024 / Accepted: 1 November 2024 / Published: 5 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RNA in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Prognosis, early detection, and relapse identification are jointly crucial factors for effective lung cancer treatment. Blood-based liquid biopsy, a non-invasive method, can provide solutions to the deadlocks in the management of this widespread cancer type by eliciting biomarkers. In this research, an integrated approach is developed, which combines the use of databases and experimental validation to find adequate biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer. The arising results, concerning miR-29a-3p in exosomes and lncRNA H19 in cfRNA, widen the horizons for identifying and exploiting promising biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Abstract

Background and Objective: Lung cancer, the second most prevalent cancer globally, poses significant challenges in early detection and prognostic assessment. Despite advancements in targeted therapies and immunotherapy, the timely identification of relapse remains elusive. Blood-based liquid biopsy biomarkers, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating-free RNAs (cfRNAs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs)/exosomes, offer promise for non-invasive monitoring. Methods: We employ a comprehensive approach integrating miRNA/lncRNA/metabolomic datasets, following a mixed-methods content analysis, to identify candidate biomarkers in NSCLC. NSCLC-associated miRNA/gene/lncRNA associations were linked to in silico-derived molecular pathways. Results: For data validation, mass spectrometry-based untargeted metabolomics of plasma EVs highlighted miRNA/lncRNA/metabotypes, linking “glycerophospholipid metabolism” to lncRNA H19 and “alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism” to miR-29a-3p. Prognostic significance was established for miR-29a-3p, showing lower expression in NSCLC patients with disease progression compared to stable disease (p = 0.004). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis indicated that patients with miR-29a-3p under-expression had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (p = 0.038). Despite the expression of lncRNA H19 in plasma EVs being undetected, its expression in plasma cfRNAs correlated significantly with disease progression (p = 0.035). Conclusions: Herein, we showcase the potential of plasma EV-derived miR-29a-3p as a prognostic biomarker and underscore the intricate interplay of miRNAs, lncRNAs, and metabolites in NSCLC biology. Our findings offer new insights and avenues for further exploration, contributing to the ongoing quest for effective biomarkers in early-stage NSCLC.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed type of cancer. The relative 5-year survival rate increases from 6% for distant-stage disease to 33% for regional-stage disease and 60% for local-stage disease [1]. While lung cancer therapies have made great strides with the discovery of various targeted therapies [2] and the effective use of immunotherapy in some patient groups, currently used disease monitoring methods and treatment regimens lack the ability to detect relapse early [3]. Lung cancer is divided into two main types, which are non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The three main types of NSCLC are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large-cell carcinoma. NSCLC is only detected when the disease is already advanced [4].
Blood-based liquid biopsy biomarkers such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating cell-free RNAs (cfRNAs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs)/exosomes are potential indicators of tumor burden in cancer patients [5,6]. These minimally invasive “liquid biopsies” have attracted considerable attention due to their obvious clinical significance for personalized medicine, such as the identification and stratification of cancer patients [7]. The use of liquid biopsies for the early detection of lung cancer is of great public interest [8] but faces major challenges in terms of the standardization of pre-analytical conditions and methodologies and the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of biomarkers.
EVs carry various types of cargo molecules including RNAs, lipids, DNAs, proteins, and metabolites and due to the protection of these cargo molecules by their lipid bilayer membrane, EVs have attracted considerable attention as a component of liquid biopsies [9,10]. Tumor cell-derived EVs have previously been shown to contain disease-related markers [6], and circulating EVs derived from tumor cells could be a new minimally invasive diagnostic tool for identifying asymptomatic cancer patients [10,11,12,13]. To date, there have been few studies on the systematic screening of EVs associated with prognosis and response to the treatment of lung cancer [14,15,16,17].
Metabolomics analysis of EVs has gained interest in cancer research [18,19], as metabolomics studies allow for the simultaneous analysis of thousands of different endogenous metabolites in a given biological sample. In terms of responses to treatment, several groups have investigated metabolomic changes in cancer cells [20,21,22,23], suggesting that an unbiased metabolomic investigation of cancer cell-derived EVs is essential to identify novel cancer biomarkers for prognosis, prediction, and therapeutic responses in several cancers, including lung cancer [24,25].
In addition to metabolites, microRNAs (miRNAs) are also important components of EVs and are more stable in circulation than cell-free miRNAs [26]. EVs are enriched with noncoding RNAs, including miRNAs. Extracellular miRNA mainly exists in the EVs, so they are thought to be selectively classified as EVs [27]. Both miRNA and pre-miRNA can be secreted into exosomes and microvesicles in protein-bound and protein-free forms. In addition to being packed into exosomes or microvesicles, extracellular miRNAs can be loaded into high-density lipoprotein (HDL) [28] or bound by AGO2 protein outside of vesicles [29]. Recent studies have shown that exo-miRNAs can be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in human malignant tumors, including breast and lung cancer [30,31,32,33]. Moreover, in lung cancer, EV miRNA expression levels have been associated with resistance to targeted therapy [34,35,36].
Herein, we designed, employed, and optimized a strategy coupling a mixed-methods content analysis (i.e., gold standard approach for content analysis) to a metabotype approach in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for bias minimization in the selection of EV miRNAs as predictors of relapse in patients with early-stage NSCLC. For this, data and text mining led to candidate miRNAs and lncRNAs, further supported by in silico-derived molecular pathways. The latter were validated by mass spectrometry-based untargeted metabolomics in plasma EVs. Next, the informative relationships through which metabotypes (individual metabolomic profiles) are connected to miRNAs/lncRNAs were interrogated to reveal miR-29a-3p, which was differentially expressed and detected in early-stage NSCLC plasma EVs vs. healthy individuals. This holistic strategy presents a great opportunity to unveil patterns and provide new insights for NSCLC biology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Clinical Samples

Thirty-two patients with early-stage NSCLC were enrolled in the study. From these patients, n = 32 peripheral blood samples (25 mL in EDTA tubes) were prospectively collected at baseline (pre-surgery), and the peripheral blood samples from n = 10 healthy donors (HDs) were used as controls. All patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the Ethics and Scientific Committee of the Metropolitan General Hospital of Athens. All HDs had no known illness or fever at the time of the blood draw, no history of malignant disease, were ≥35 years old, and 52.6% were female and 47.4% were male. The main patient characteristics of the clinical samples are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles

EV isolation was previously described [37] and performed herein for the most efficient RNA isolation using the Macherey-Nagel™ Exosome Precipitation Solution for Serum/Plasma (Düren, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany). This polymer-based method was chosen due to its high recovery rate and ability to preserve the integrity and biological relevance of EVs. Size exclusion chromatography further confirmed EV isolation in addition to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (Supplementary Materials). Considering that transmission electron microscopy (TEM) suffers from drawbacks such as time-consuming processes, low analysis throughputs, and potential imaging artifacts, high-sensitivity nano-flow cytometry analysis was applied to more thoroughly reveal the concentration and size distribution of EVs (NanoFCM Inc., Nottingham, United Kingdom). EVs were also characterized by automated digital holographic microscopy (Agilent BioTek Lionheart FX, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with DiO staining for lipid bilayer detection (MISEV2023). For this, an automated image segmentation and quantification framework based on a multitask learning (MTL) convolutional neural network was employed. The MTL model was built on a modified U-Net architecture [38] incorporating transfer learning, residual connections, and a regression block for the quantification of EVs. For network training, EVs from cell culture supernatants were isolated and stained with DiO for fluorescence imaging at 20× magnification (n = 115). Images were augmented (10 per sample), producing 102,465 sub-images resized to 128 × 128 pixels. Image preprocessing involved green channel enhancement with CLAHE [34] and denoising. Ground truth masks were generated using an automated pipeline based on pixel intensity distributions. The architecture featured a Vgg16 pre-trained encoder [39], a connection block, and a U-Net-based decoder. Residual connections were incorporated, and a regression block was added for counting. The MTL model performed two tasks, namely image segmentation to produce masks via the U-Net decoder and EV counting via the regression head. Overall performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient [40,41] and the intersection over union (IoU) [42] for segmentation. Outputs were compared to BioTek Gen5 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), EVAnalyzer [43], and NanoFCM Software V1.17 (NanoFCM Inc., Nottingham, United Kingdom) for quantification against an external test of human plasma samples. Hyperparameter tuning was performed for model prediction optimization. The optimal MTL model selected along with the tuned parameters was employed for EV quantification (NSCLC patient plasma sample images). The models were built in R language v4.1 utilizing TensorFlow [44] and Keras libraries (https://keras.io, accessed on 1 November 2022). For statistics, the Wilcoxon test was performed in RStudio Server Version 1.4.1717, “Juliet Rose” (df86b69e, 24 May 2021) for CentOS 8, R version 4.1.0 (18 May 2021)—“Camp Pontanezen”.

2.3. Isolation of Total RNA and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA isolation from EVs was carried out utilizing the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the protocols provided by the manufacturer. Subsequently, cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using the Engineered M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase Basic Kit (EnzyQuest, Crete, Greece) in a reaction with a total volume of 20 μL according to the manufacturer’s instructions, whereas in the case of miRNAs, the cDNA was synthesized using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems™, Massachusetts, MA, USA) and miRNA-specific stem-loop primers in a reaction with a total volume of 17 μL. For recovery estimation, 0.2 nM of an exogenous synthetic miRNA, Caenorhabditis elegans miR-39 (cel-miR-39), was added to each sample as an external control, as previously described [45,46].

2.4. Quantification of miRNA Expression by RT-qPCR

The expression levels of miR-29a-3p, miR-191, and cel-miR-39 were quantified by RT-qPCR using TaqMan microRNA assays (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. RT-qPCR was performed in a final volume of 10 μL containing 1 μL of cDNA template, 5 μL of Platinum™ Quantitative PCR SuperMix-UDG (Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), 0.5 μL miRNA-specific primer, and 3.5 μL (DEPC)-treated H2O. All reactions were performed using the Cobas® 4800 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). The reaction mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Expression values were normalized to miR-191, which was found to be a suitable reference miRNA. The expression levels of miR-29a-3p were normalized using the 2−ΔΔCt approach to the expression of miR-191.
The expression levels of lncRNA H19 and B2M were quantified by RT-qPCR. RT-qPCR was performed in a final volume of 10 μL with 1 μL cDNA template and 9 μL mix. All reactions were performed using the Mic Real qPCR Cycler (Bio Molecular Systems, Upper Coomera QLD, Australia). The reaction mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. The expression levels of H19 were normalized using the 2−ΔΔCt approach to the expression of Β2Μ.

2.5. Data and Text Mining

We applied a mixed-methods content analysis, a gold standard approach for a content analysis consisting of deductive (quantitative) and inductive (qualitative) phases, taking into account contemporary definitions. For data and text mining, as well as data analysis, the peer-reviewed literature, omics datasets, and clinical trial outcomes were mined to investigate miRNAs/lncRNAs/plasma metabotypes of NSCLC. We have also developed a novel framework to meet our analytical demands by exploring data (both context and content). The literature data from Scopus and PubMed/MEDLINE were queried. Scopus and PubMed/MEDLINE are the largest citation and abstract databases of the peer-reviewed literature. To account for selection biases, private and publicly available texts have been assessed (based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria set, as well as the keywords and MeSH terms in question; www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh, accessed on 8 October 2022; Supplementary Table S1). We questioned the interim output further for open data (yes/no), sample size (validated by a power analysis), research approach, and publication impact/metrics. Studies that failed to meet inclusion criteria or studies on non-human samples were excluded. Two co-authors (V.B. and T.K.) co-analyzed the interim and final outputs, and then the percentage of inter-rater agreement was calculated. To account for biases, Cohen’s kappa statistic and percentage agreement were also determined with multi-categorical ratings. Candidate miRNAs/lncRNAs/plasma metabotypes were identified.
For gene expression analysis, an external cohort of NSCLC patients was employed, matching the histological subtypes of our cohort and also serving as the only publicly available dataset of the largest sample size; the GDD53627 (GSE10245) dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [47] repository that consists of adenocarcinoma (n = 40) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 18) data.
Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis was performed for the two subtypes within the GEO platform through the Geo2R tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/, accessed on 28 September 2022) using the cut-off values of p-adj. < 0.05 and fold change > |2|. Genes were noted either as up- or down-regulated. Next, the miRTarBase [48] was mined for gene–miRNA pairs, taking into account only the experimentally validated human gene–miRNA pairs, resulting in n = 93 miRNAs being not only NSCLC-related but also associated with the NSCLC subtypes in question. To determine miRNA/lncRNA associations in NSCLC, the LncTarD 2.0 platform [49] was used. We retrieved all the experimentally supported functional lncRNA target datasets (key targets and biological functions driven by disease-related lncRNAs and lncRNA-mediated regulatory mechanisms in human diseases). Then, NCSLC filters were applied to ensure that DEG/miRNA/lncRNA associations also provided underlying information regarding NSCLC subtypes (adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas).
lncRNA and miRNA datasets were cross-linked, validated, and enriched by pathway analysis and text mining, then filtered by statistical significance. miRNAs were interrogated further using miRPathDB [50], listing in silico-derived molecular pathways. A pathway-centric approach was followed, selecting only those pathways with strong evidence of association through experimental validation. Hence, we identified the pathways in which our miRNAs were expected to be over-represented based on a statistical significance filter with an adjusted p-value < 0.05.
Untargeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics was performed on plasma EVs to a. provide an external validation method for the computationally identified miRNA-related pathways enabling pathway-based integration and b. assess the discrimination ability of our cohort based on the histological subtypes of NSCLC patients. Given that histological subtypes serve as known independent prognostic factors, metabotypes were obtained and tested to see if they could stratify NSCLC patients based on their prognosis (typically, survival rates are higher for patients with squamous cell carcinomas when compared to patients with adenocarcinomas). Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) was also performed to identify biologically meaningful patterns significantly enriched in our dataset. miRNAs/lncRNAs/metabolites were linked through their enriched molecular pathways, data, and text mining, then filtered by statistics. Our pipeline for the identification of miRNAs and lncRNAs as candidate biomarkers is summarized in Figure 1 and provided in detail in the Supplementary Materials and Supplementary File 1.

2.6. Untargeted Metabolomics

For quenching and extracting the EV metabolites, we added ice-cold 80:20 mass spectrometry-grade methanol/water (v/v) to each sample prior to snap freezing in liquid nitrogen for 1 min (three repeats). Samples were then thawed on ice, followed by vortex mixing and sonication between each cycle. Samples were centrifuged at −5 °C at 15,000× g for 10 min and supernatants were loaded into Amicon Ultra 3 kDa tubes (Merck Millipore, MA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Flow-throughs were collected and dried down (lyophilized) in a centrifugal vacuum evaporator for 18 h. No heating was applied during the drying process. Next, samples were reconstituted and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter and fortified with stable isotope-labeled standards before injection. Quality control and internal standard samples were prepared as described [51,52]. The analysis was carried out using a Thermo Scientific Vanquish LC coupled to Orbitrap Exploris 240 MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). An electrospray ionization interface was used as an ionization source. Analysis was performed in positive and negative ionization modes under polarity switching. The UPLC was performed using a slightly modified version of the protocol described by Catalin et al. (UPLC/MS Monitoring of Water-Soluble Vitamin Bs in Cell Culture Media in Minutes, Water Application note 2011, 720004042en). Peak areas were extracted using Compound Discoverer 3.3 (Thermo Scientific). Data were processed using Compound Discoverer 3.3 (ThermoFisher Scientific) and Skyline 22.2. The identification of compounds was performed at four levels; level 1: identification by retention times (compared against in-house authentic standards), accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm), and MS/MS spectra; level 2a: identification by retention times (compared against in-house authentic standards), accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm); level 2b: identification by accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm) and MS/MS spectra; and level 3: identification by accurate mass alone (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm) (Supplementary Files 2 and 3, as well as deposited data in the EMBL-EBI MetaboLights database with the identifier MTBLS11489 [53]).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS (version 26) statistical package. For the statistical analysis, we divided NSCLC patients into two different groups, high-expression and low-expression groups, using the median ΔΔCq of noncancerous samples for each miRNA studied at the corresponding cut-offs. Our data were evaluated related to the expression of miR-29a-3p by normalizing to the expression of miR-191 and using the 2−ΔΔCt method, as described in detail by Livak and Schmittgen [54]. Similarly, we analyzed all our data related to the overexpression of lncRNA H19 by normalizing to the expression of B2M and using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The Mann–Whitney test was used to analyze the difference in miRNA expression levels between the groups and the comparison between the different baseline characteristics.
For metabolomics, test groups were cross-compared first to gain insights into the NSCLC metabotypes [52]. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were applied where appropriate, followed by Bonferroni correction. A critical significance threshold was set at <0.05, including FDR correction. For comparative analysis, log2-fold change calculations were performed, along with principal component analysis (PCA) and ortho partial least squares discriminant (OPLS-DA) analysis (Metaboanalyst 5.0) [55]. Only metabolites with annotation levels 1 and 2a were selected for subsequent enrichment analysis (Supplementary Files 2 and 3). Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) was performed using Metaboanalyst 6.0 [56] employing pathway-associated metabolite sets (SMPDB). Data were normalized to the sample median, followed by log10 transformation and Pareto scaling. For the interrogation of metabolic pathways, the mummichog algorithm was applied, enabling one-step functional analysis through tandem mass spectra feature tables [57]. The top 10 most significantly associated m/z features were input into the mummichog algorithm v.2. The KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) database was selected as the pathway library of interest. Only those metabolic pathways containing at least 3 significant metabolites were considered. The significance threshold was set at a p-value < 0.05, including FDR correction.

3. Results

3.1. Gene–miRNA–lncRNA Associations Unveil Candidate NSCLC Biomarkers

Differential analysis of gene expression in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma NSCLC patients has uncovered a set of n = 228 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), comprising n = 196 down-regulated and n = 112 up-regulated genes. Our findings, illustrated in the volcano plot (Supplementary Figure S1), suggest distinct regulatory patterns. miRTarBase analysis identified n = 93 miRNAs targeting n = 42 genes, as depicted in Figure 2 (DEG/miRNA associations in a directed graph). Network A showcases gene–miRNA associations, highlighting that among n = 42 DEGs, n = 23 were up-regulated, whereas n = 70 were down-regulated in NSCLC adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma. Of note, three central hubs—JAG1, SNAI2, and SOX2—emerged in network A, all being down-regulated. LncTarD 2.0 retrieved NSCLC-associated lncRNAs (rectangle nodes). The resulting two networks yielded a curated list of associations among miRNAs/genes/lncRNAs associations (Supplementary Table S2).
To validate in silico-derived molecular pathways, untargeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics in plasma EV-cross-linked metabotypes with miRNA/lncRNA-enriched pathways were generated by our computational approach. First, EVs were quantified per sample, and then disease progression or survival was considered (Supplementary Figure S2). Overall, two pathways were revealed to be enriched both in the metabolomics datasets of our cohort and the miRNAs/lncRNAs linked to the external NSCLC cohort, namely “alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism” and “glycerophospholipid metabolism” pathways (Figure 3 and Supplementary Files 3–5). miR-29a-3p was found to be over-represented in the “alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism” pathway, whereas miR-338-3p was over-represented in the “glycerophospholipid metabolism” pathway (Supplementary Table S3). The latter was linked to MACC1 and hence, to lncRNA H19. Candidate biomarkers have bold outlines in both networks A and B.

3.2. Prognostic Significance of Differentially Expressed miR-29a-3p in Plasma EVs of Early-Stage NSCLC Patients

A positive or negative association was explored for miR-29a-3p and miR-191 in plasma EVs. Over-expression and under-expression were estimated by evaluating the differences in miR-29a-3p expression levels between plasma EVs of NSCLC patients before surgery (n = 31) and HDs (n = 10). The expression levels of miR-29a-3p in plasma EVs of NSCLC patients were significantly different from HDs (p = 0.004, Supplementary Figure S3).
The correlation of miR-29a-3p expression levels with the patients’ clinical outcome revealed that patients who had a progression of the disease had significantly lower expression levels than patients who had stable disease (p = 0.002, Figure 4A). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were performed by using patients’ postoperative survival. Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated that patients with miR-29a-3p under-expression had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those with miR-29a-3p over-expression (p 0.038, Figure 4B), whereas there was no correlation with disease-free intervals (DFIs).

3.3. Expression of LncRNA H19 in NSCLC Plasma EVs and Plasma cfRNA

RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of lncRNA H19 in EVs from NSCLC patients (n = 31) and HDs (n = 10) (Supplementary Figure S4). The results showed that the expression of lncRNAH19 was not detected in any of the plasma EV samples. We further evaluated the expression of lncRNA H19 in plasma cfRNAs of the same patients, and we observed that there is a statistically significant difference in expression between patients that had disease progression than patients who had stable disease (p = 0.035). However, the expression levels of lncRNA H19 in plasma samples were not correlated with DFIs and OS.

4. Discussion

EVs are an essential component of carcinogenesis and are found in cancer-releasing mediators that affect tumor progression through their ability to transfer their cargo between cells [58]. To date, most studies in EVs have examined nucleic acids or proteins in EVs [59], but metabolomics analysis in EVs provides in-depth network analysis by integrating DNA–RNA–protein–metabolite interactions.
In the present study, comprehensive EV metabolomic profiling was performed to identify and internally validate candidate biomarkers for the early detection of relapse in NSCLC patients and their interactions with ncRNAs. Our study shows that metabolomics in plasma EVs (untargeted analysis) links “glycerophospholipid metabolism” to lncRNA H19 and “alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism” to miR-29a-3p. Both glycerophospholipid and alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism have been showcased in lung cancer, mainly in serum samples [60,61]. Hence, our findings highlight a critical aspect of NSCLC’s metabolic reprogramming. Tryptophan metabolism has been identified as the pathway with the most significant enrichment (with a p-value of 0.015). This result is consistent with previous studies on NSCLC patient serum samples, which suggest that alterations in tryptophan metabolism play a critical role in tumor progression, underscoring the diagnostic and prognostic potential of L-tryptophan [62,63]. However, our analysis did not reveal any significant connection between tryptophan metabolism and miRNAs/ ncRNAs.
Glycerophospholipid metabolism, pivotal for membrane biosynthesis and cellular signaling, has been previously implicated in cancer; herein, we extend this association into the realm of EVs, suggesting that alterations in this pathway could be mediated or regulated by lncRNA H19. Given that lncRNA H19 has been implicated in various oncogenic processes, including proliferation, apoptosis resistance, and metastasis, its interaction with glycerophospholipid metabolism may provide novel insights [64]. For miR-29a-3p and the metabolism of alanine, aspartate, and glutamate, it is known that those amino acids play vital roles in cancer metabolism, including supporting the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and nucleotide synthesis, which are essential for the high proliferative demands of cancer cells. The association of miR-29a-3p with these metabolic pathways reinforces its potential as a biomarker, given its known role in modulating gene expression involved in cancer progression and its demonstrated presence in lung cancer [65,66,67]. The interplay between miR-29a-3p and these metabolic pathways further suggests a nuanced mechanism where miRNA regulation could influence the metabolic rewiring characteristic of NSCLC.
To our knowledge, this is the first time that miR-29a-3p has been studied in plasma EVs from early-stage NSCLC patients. Few studies have reported its role in lung cancer in cell lines [66,67,68,69]. According to our results, the expression levels of miR-29a-3p in plasma EVs from NSCLC patients were significantly different from HDs (p = 0.004), and patients with advanced disease had significantly lower expression levels than patients with stable disease (p = 0.002). This finding is consistent with other studies using plasma or tissue samples, reporting that miR-29a-3p was abnormally low in a number of human malignancies, including papillary thyroid carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, and breast cancer [70].
According to our results, the expression of lncRNA H19 in plasma samples from patients with NSCLC was prognostically insignificant, but there was a statistically significant difference between NSCLC patients in whom the disease was advanced and patients in whom the disease was stable. Studies have shown that highly expressed H19 in plasma could be a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of breast cancer and lung cancer [71]. Luo et al. have shown that based on the relative expression levels of plasma H19, significantly higher levels were observed in the NSCLC group than in the benign disease group [72].
Circulating exosomal lncRNA H19 has been described as a potential biomarker with diagnostic and prognostic value in gastric cancer (GC) [73] and breast cancer [74]. However, an interesting finding in the current study was that the expression of lncRNA H19 was not detected in the corresponding plasma EVs samples from NSCLC patients. This observation could be due to the nature of the samples, as serum samples were used in the previous studies, and the early stage of the disease is another reason for the limited amount of EVs in the bloodstream.
Further controlled studies with a larger number of patients are needed to confirm these observations. Our study combines metabolomics with miRNAs and EVs in early-stage NSCLC. It is expected that this combination will be of great benefit and contribute to the optimal use of treatment and management strategies for patients with an increased risk of metastasis.

5. Conclusions

Taking everything into consideration, the present study combines metabolomics with miRNAs and EVs in early-stage NSCLC. The results, related to miR-29a-3p and lncRNA H19, highlight their potential as promising biomarkers, which could play a key role in the treatment and management of patients with an increased risk of metastasis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers16223729/s1. Supplementary Table S1: MeSH terms; Supplementary Table S2: Final curated list of associations; Supplementary Table S3: Enriched pathways following data integration; Supplementary Figure S1: Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes for NSCLC patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma; Supplementary Figure S2: Detected EVs in NSCLC patients; Supplementary Figure S3: Relative-fold change (2−ΔΔCq) of miR-29a-3p in EVs from early-stage NSCLC patient and healthy donors; Supplementary Figure S4: Relative-fold change (2−ΔΔCq) of lncRNA H19 in EVs from early-stage NSCLC patients and healthy donors; SupplementaryFile1_EVQuantificationCharacterization (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZFobGTmU-wo370wf1BGi11hBOcmZ1KM1/view?usp=sharing); SupplementaryFile2_RawData (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mEKceDyZ0lsCvfg6iRu5vsTwzJAFshSQ/view?usp=sharing); SupplementaryFile3_FinalData_AnnotationLevels1_2a; SupplementaryFile4_FinalData_Comparisons; SupplementaryFile5_FinalData_Violinplots.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.; methodology, A.M. and T.K.; validation, A.M. and T.K.; formal analysis, V.B. and S.O.; investigation, V.B. and E.T.; resources, A.M., T.K., E.L., V.G. and A.K.; data curation, S.O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M. and T.K.; visualization, A.M. and T.K.; supervision, A.M. and T.K.; project administration, A.M. and T.K.; funding acquisition, T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is partly supported by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH–CREATE–INNOVATE (project code: T2EDK-03153). We acknowledge PRACE for awarding access to the Fenix Infrastructure resources at CINECA and Jülich hosting sites, which are partially funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through the ICEI project under grant agreement no. 800858.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics and Scientific Committees of the participating center “Metropolitan General” Hospitals (ref: 308/28-12-2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ben Peacock, NanoFCM, Inc., and Joseph Brealy, NanoFCM, Inc., for their valuable insights and support with the high-sensitivity nano-flow cytometry analysis. Special thanks also go to the MS-Omics team, particularly Anna Abrahamsson and Sara Piqueras Solsona, for their contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mithoowani, H.; Febbraro, M. Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in 2022: A Review for General Practitioners in Oncology. Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29, 1828–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, Y.-L.; Tsuboi, M.; He, J.; John, T.; Grohe, C.; Majem, M.; Goldman, J.W.; Laktionov, K.; Kim, S.-W.; Kato, T.; et al. Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1711–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Herbst, R.S.; Morgensztern, D.; Boshoff, C. The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Nature 2018, 553, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alduais, Y.; Zhang, H.; Fan, F.; Chen, J.; Chen, B. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A review of risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Medicine 2023, 102, e32899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Markou, A.; Tzanikou, E.; Lianidou, E. The potential of liquid biopsy in the management of cancer patients. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 84, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heidrich, I.; Deitert, B.; Werner, S.; Pantel, K. Liquid biopsy for monitoring of tumor dormancy and early de-tection of disease recurrence in solid tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2023, 42, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Frullanti, E.; Serrano, M.J. Editorial: Current trends and future perspectives about liquid biopsy. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1345876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, L.; Jiang, H.; Zeng, B.; Wang, X.; Bao, Y.; Chen, C.; Ma, L.; Yuan, J. Liquid biopsy in lung cancer. Clin. Chim. Acta 2024, 554, 117757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shin, H.; Choi, B.H.; Shim, O.; Kim, J.; Park, Y.; Cho, S.K.; Kim, H.K.; Choi, Y. Single test-based diagnosis of multiple cancer types using Exosome-SERS-AI for early-stage cancers. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, Y.; Wei, S.; Geng, N.; Qin, W.; He, X.; Wang, X.; Qi, Y.; Song, S.; Wang, P. Evaluation of circulating small extracellular vesicle-derived miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for differentiating between different patho-logical types of early lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Panagiotara, A.; Markou, A.; Lianidou, E.S.; Patrinos, G.P.; Katsila, T. Exosomes: A Cancer Theranostics Road Map. Public Health Genom. 2017, 20, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wiklander, O.P.B.; Nordin, J.Z.; O’Loughlin, A.; Gustafsson, Y.; Corso, G.; Mäger, I.; Vader, P.; Lee, Y.; Sork, H.; Seow, Y.; et al. Extracellular vesicle in vivo biodistribution is determined by cell source, route of administration and targeting. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2015, 4, 26316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Thind, A.; Wilson, C. Exosomal miRNAs as cancer biomarkers and therapeutic targets. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2016, 5, 31292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Whiteside, T.L. Validation of plasma-derived small extracellular vesicles as cancer biomarkers. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 17, 719–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, J.S.; Hur, J.Y.; Kim, I.A.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, C.M.; Lee, J.C.; Kim, W.S.; Lee, K.Y. Liquid biopsy using the su-pernatant of a pleural effusion for EGFR genotyping in pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients: A comparison between cell-free DNA and extracellular vesicle-derived DNA. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Smolarz, M.; Widlak, P. Serum Exosomes and Their miRNA Load—A Potential Biomarker of Lung Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alexandre, D.; Teixeira, B.; Rico, A.; Valente, S.; Craveiro, A.; Baptista, P.V.; Cruz, C. Molecular Beacon for De-tection miRNA-21 as a Biomarker of Lung Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ab Razak, N.S.; Ab Mutalib, N.S.; Mohtar, M.A.; Abu, N. Impact of Chemotherapy on Extracellular Vesicles: Understanding the Chemo-EVs. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Collino, S.; Martin, F.-P.; Moco, S. Metabonomics in Clinical Practice. In Metabonomics and Gut Microbiota in Nutrition and Disease; Kochhar, S., Martin, F.-P., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2015; pp. 25–44. ISBN 978-1-4471-6538-5. [Google Scholar]
  20. Del Coco, L.; Majellaro, M.; Boccarelli, A.; Cellamare, S.; Altomare, C.D.; Fanizzi, F.P. Novel Antiproliferative Biphenyl Nicotinamide: NMR Metabolomic Study of its Effect on the MCF-7 Cell in Comparison with Cisplatin and Vinblastine. Molecules 2020, 25, 3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koch, K.; Hartmann, R.; Tsiampali, J.; Uhlmann, C.; Nickel, A.-C.; He, X.; Kamp, M.A.; Sabel, M.; Barker, R.A.; Steiger, H.-J.; et al. A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity. Cell Death Discov. 2020, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wei, B.; Wang, C.; Teng, T.; Guo, P.; Chen, M.; Xia, F.; Liu, H.; Xie, J.; Feng, J.; Huang, H. Chemotherapeutic ef-ficacy of cucurmosin for pancreatic cancer as an alternative of gemcitabine: A comparative metabolomic study. Gland. Surg. 2020, 9, 1428–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lu, S.; Lu, R.; Song, H.; Wu, J.; Liu, X.; Zhou, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, H.; Tang, C.; Guo, H.; et al. Metabolomic study of natrin-induced apoptosis in SMMC-7721 hepatocellular carcinoma cells by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 1264–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Jin, M.; Yang, H.; Huang, G. Shikonin inhibited glycolysis and sensitized cisplatin treatment in non-small cell lung cancer cells via the exosomal pyruvate kinase M2 pathway. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 13906–13918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, D.; Zhao, C.; Xu, F.; Zhang, A.; Jin, M.; Zhang, K.; Liu, L.; Hua, Q.; Zhao, J.; Liu, J.; et al. Cispla-tin-resistant NSCLC cells induced by hypoxia transmit resistance to sensitive cells through exosomal PKM2. Theranostics 2021, 11, 2860–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, Y.; El Andaloussi, S.; Wood, M.J.A. Exosomes and microvesicles: Extracellular vesicles for genetic infor-mation transfer and gene therapy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012, 21, R125–R134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Makarova, J.; Turchinovich, A.; Shkurnikov, M.; Tonevitsky, A. Extracellular miRNAs and Cell-Cell Communication: Problems and Prospects. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2021, 46, 640–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tabet, F.; Vickers, K.C.; Cuesta Torres, L.F.; Wiese, C.B.; Shoucri, B.M.; Lambert, G.; Catherinet, C.; Prado-Lourenco, L.; Levin, M.G.; Thacker, S.; et al. HDL-transferred microRNA-223 regulates ICAM-1 expression in endothelial cells. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arroyo, J.D.; Chevillet, J.R.; Kroh, E.M.; Ruf, I.K.; Pritchard, C.C.; Gibson, D.F.; Mitchell, P.S.; Bennett, C.F.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.L.; Stirewalt, D.L.; et al. Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5003–5008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, Y.; Jin, L.-J.; Zhang, X.-Y. Exosomal miRNA-205 promotes breast cancer chemoresistance and tumorigenesis through E2F1. Aging 2021, 13, 18498–18514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, D.; Qu, D. Early diagnostic and prognostic value of serum exosomal miR-1246 in non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2020, 13, 1601–1607. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kanaoka, R.; Iinuma, H.; Dejima, H.; Sakai, T.; Uehara, H.; Matsutani, N.; Kawamura, M. Usefulness of Plasma Exosomal MicroRNA-451a as a Noninvasive Biomarker for Early Prediction of Recurrence and Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Oncology 2018, 94, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Singh, Y.; Subbarao, N.; Jaimini, A.; Hathaway, Q.A.; Kunovac, A.; Erickson, B.; Swarup, V.; Singh, H.N. Genome-wide expression reveals potential biomarkers in breast cancer bone metastasis. J. Integr. Bioinform. 2022, 19, 20210041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hashemi, M.; Khosroshahi, E.M.; Chegini, M.K.; Abedi, M.; Matinahmadi, A.; Hosnarody, Y.S.D.; Rezaei, M.; Saghari, Y.; Fattah, E.; Abdi, S.; et al. miRNAs and exosomal miRNAs in lung cancer: New emerging players in tumor progression and therapy response. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2023, 251, 154906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cheng, D.; Wang, B.; Wu, L.; Chen, R.; Zhao, W.; Fang, C.; Ji, M. Exosomal non-coding RNAs-mediated EGFR-TKIs resistance in NSCLC with EGFR mutation. Med. Oncol. 2023, 40, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hisakane, K.; Seike, M.; Sugano, T.; Matsuda, K.; Kashiwada, T.; Nakamichi, S.; Matsumoto, M.; Miyanaga, A.; Noro, R.; Kubota, K.; et al. Serum-derived exosomal miR-125a-3p predicts the response to anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Gene 2023, 857, 147177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Katsila, T.; Juliachs, M.; Gregori, J.; Macarulla, T.; Villarreal, L.; Bardelli, A.; Torrance, C.; Elez, E.; Tabernero, J.; Villanueva, J. Circulating pEGFR Is a Candidate Response Biomarker of Cetuximab Therapy in Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 6346–6356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ronneberger, O.; Fischer, P.; Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1505.04597. [Google Scholar]
  39. Simonyan, K.; Zisserman, A. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1409.1556. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pizer, S.M.; Amburn, E.P.; Austin, J.D.; Cromartie, R.; Geselowitz, A.; Greer, T.; ter Haar Romeny, B.; Zimmerman, J.B.; Zuiderveld, K. Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 1987, 39, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dice, L.R. Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species. Ecology 1945, 26, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fleiss Joseph, L.; Levin, B.; Cho, P.M. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. The Measurement of Interrater Agreement. Wiley Ser. Probab. Stat. 2003, 2, 598–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schürz, M.; Danmayr, J.; Jaritsch, M.; Klinglmayr, E.; Benirschke, H.M.; Matea, C.; Zimmerebner, P.; Rauter, J.; Wolf, M.; Gomes, F.G. EVAnalyzer: High content imaging for rigorous characterisation of single extracellular vesicles using standard laboratory equipment and a new open-source ImageJ/Fiji plugin. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2022, 11, e12282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Abadi, M.; Agarwal, A.; Barham, P.; Brevdo, E.; Chen, Z.; Citro, C.; Corrado, G.S.; Davis, A.; Dean, J.; Devin, M.; et al. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1603.04467v2. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sourvinou, I.S.; Markou, A.; Lianidou, E.S. Quantification of Circulating miRNAs in Plasma. J. Mol. Diagn. 2013, 15, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kuner, R.; Muley, T.; Meister, M.; Ruschhaupt, M.; Buness, A.; Xu, E.C.; Schnabel, P.; Warth, A.; Poustka, A.; Sültmann, H.; et al. Global gene expression analysis reveals specific patterns of cell junctions in non-small cell lung cancer subtypes. Lung Cancer 2009, 63, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barrett, T.; Wilhite, S.E.; Ledoux, P.; Evangelista, C.; Kim, I.F.; Tomashevsky, M.; Marshall, K.A.; Phillippy, K.H.; Sherman, P.M.; Holko, M.; et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets—Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D991–D995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, H.Y.; Lin, Y.C.D.; Cui, S.; Huang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Xu, J.; Bao, J.; Li, Y.; Wen, J.; Zuo, H.; et al. miRTarBase update 2022: An informative resource for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D222–D230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, H.; Yin, X.; Xu, H.; Liu, K.; Liu, W.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Bo, L.; Lan, X.; Lin, S.; et al. LncTarD 2.0: An up-dated comprehensive database for experimentally-supported functional lncRNA–target regulations in human diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D199–D207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kehl, T.; Kern, F.; Backes, C.; Fehlmann, T.; Stöckel, D.; Meese, E.; Lenhof, H.-P.; Keller, A. miRPathDB 2.0: A novel release of the miRNA Pathway Dictionary Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D142–D147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chalikiopoulou, C.; Gómez-Tamayo, J.C.; Katsila, T. Untargeted Metabolomics for Disease-Specific Signatures. In Mass Spectrometry for Metabolomics; González-Domínguez, R., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Volume 2571, pp. 71–81. ISBN 978-1-07-162698-6. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bafiti, V.; Ouzounis, S.; Siapi, E.; Grypari, I.M.; Theofanopoulos, A.; Panagiotopoulos, V.; Zolota, V.; Kardamakis, D.; Katsila, T. Bioenergetic Profiling in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients with Different Clinical Outcomes. Metabolites 2023, 13, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yurekten, O.; Payne, T.; Tejera, N.; Amaladoss, F.X.; Martin, C.; Williams, M.; O'Donovan, C. MetaboLights: Open data repository for metabolomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, D640–D646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Pang, Z.; Chong, J.; Zhou, G.; de Lima Morais, D.A.; Chang, L.; Barrette, M.; Gauthier, C.; Jacques, P.-É.; Li, S.; Xia, J. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: Narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W388–W396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pang, Z.; Yao, L.; Zhou, G.; Hui, F.; Xu, L.; Viau, C.; Spigelman, A.F.; MacDonald, P.E.; Wishart, D.S.; Li, S.; et al. MetaboAnalyst 6.0: Towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W398–W406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, S.; Park, Y.; Duraisingham, S.; Strobel, F.H.; Khan, N.; Soltow, Q.A.; Jones, D.P.; Pulendran, B. Predicting Network Activity from High Throughput Metabolomics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9, e1003123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Teng, Y.; Gao, L.; Loveless, R.; Rodrigo, J.P.; Strojan, P.; Willems, S.M.; Nathan, C.-A.; Mäkitie, A.A.; Saba, N.F.; Ferlito, A. The Hidden Link of Exosomes to Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yi, G.; Luo, H.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y. Exosomal Proteomics: Unveiling Novel Insights into Lung Cancer. Aging Dis. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Peng, S.-L.; Wang, R.; Zhou, Y.-L.; Wei, W.; Zhong, G.-H.; Huang, X.-T.; Yang, S.; Liu, Q.-D.; Liu, Z.-G. Insight of a Metabolic Prognostic Model to Identify Tumor Environment and Drug Vulnerability for Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 872910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, D.; Zhuo, J.; Ye, C.; Su, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, C.; Lin, L.; Liu, L.; Zhao, H.; Luo, T.; et al. Variations in pleural microbiota and metabolic phenotype associated with malignant pleural effusion in human lung adenocarci-noma. Thorac. Cancer 2023, 14, 2045–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sun, R.; Fei, F.; Wang, M.; Jiang, J.; Yang, G.; Yang, N.; Jin, D.; Xu, Z.; Cao, B.; Li, J. Integration of metabolomics and machine learning revealed tryptophan metabolites are sensitive biomarkers of pemetrexed efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2023, 12, 19245–19259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, R.; Li, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tian, X.; Zhang, X. A comprehensive analysis of metabolomics and transcriptomics in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232272. [Google Scholar]
  64. Gluba-Sagr, A.; Franczyk, B.; Rysz-Górzyńska, A.; Olszewski, R.; Rysz, J. The Role of Selected lncRNAs in Lipid Metabolism and Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dalgaard, L.T.; Sørensen, A.E.; Hardikar, A.A.; Joglekar, M.V. The microRNA-29 family: Role in metabolism and metabolic disease. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2022, 323, C367–C377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lin, G.; Lin, L.; Lin, H.; Xu, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Wu, J.; Chen, S.; Lin, Q.; Zeng, Y.; et al. C1QTNF6 regulated by miR-29a-3p promotes proliferation and migration in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. BMC Pulm. Med. 2022, 22, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mao, X.; Xu, S.; Wang, H.; Xiao, P.; Li, S.; Wu, J.; Sun, J.; Jin, C.; Shen, M.; Shi, Y.; et al. Integrated analysis reveals critical cisplatin-resistance regulators E2F7 contributed to tumor progression and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2024, 24, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Abrehdari-Tafreshi, Z.; Arefian, E.; Rakhshani, N.; Najafi, S.M.A. The Role of miR-29a and miR-143 on the Anti-apoptotic MCL-1/cIAP-2 Genes Expression in EGFR Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients. Biochem. Genet. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, K.; Han, X.; Hu, W.; Su, C.; He, B. miR-29a-3p inhibits the malignant characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer cells by reducing the activity of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2022, 24, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Razi, S.; Mozdarani, H.; Behzadi Andouhjerdi, R. Evaluation of the Potential Diagnostic Role of the Lnc-MIAT, miR-29a-3p, and FOXO3a ceRNA Networks as Noninvasive Circulatory Bioindicator in Ductal Carcinoma Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer 2023, 17, 11782234231184378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ghafouri-Fard, S.; Shoorei, H.; Bahroudi, Z.; Abak, A.; Taheri, M. The role of H19 lncRNA in conferring chemoresistance in cancer cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 138, 111447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Luo, J.; Li, Q.; Pan, J.; Li, L.; Fang, L.; Zhang, Y. Expression level of long noncoding RNA H19 in plasma of pa-tients with nonsmall cell lung cancer and its clinical significance. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2018, 14, 860–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhou, H.; Shen, W.; Zou, H.; Lv, Q.; Shao, P. Circulating exosomal long non-coding RNA H19 as a potential novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer. J. Int. Med. Res. 2020, 48, 030006052093429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhong, G.; Wang, K.; Li, J.; Xiao, S.; Wei, W.; Liu, J. Determination of Serum Exosomal H19 as a Noninvasive Biomarker for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Onco Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 2563–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 16 03729 g001
Figure 1. A graphical representation of the in silico pipeline designed and employed to identify miRNAs and lncRNAs that can serve as candidate biomarkers for NSCLC. Transcriptomics datasets were retrieved from the GEO database and the DGE analysis was performed with the GEO2R tool. NSCLC lncRNAs were mined through LncTarD2.0 and then cross-linked with miRNAs-DEGs. Pathway analysis was conducted based on the identified lncRNAs and miRNAs. Next, cross-omics data integration between RNA and EV metabotypes was implemented to reveal candidate biomarkers in NSCLC.
Figure 1. A graphical representation of the in silico pipeline designed and employed to identify miRNAs and lncRNAs that can serve as candidate biomarkers for NSCLC. Transcriptomics datasets were retrieved from the GEO database and the DGE analysis was performed with the GEO2R tool. NSCLC lncRNAs were mined through LncTarD2.0 and then cross-linked with miRNAs-DEGs. Pathway analysis was conducted based on the identified lncRNAs and miRNAs. Next, cross-omics data integration between RNA and EV metabotypes was implemented to reveal candidate biomarkers in NSCLC.
Cancers 16 03729 g001
Cancers 16 03729 g002
Figure 2. Network representation of the NSCLC-related gene, miRNA, and lncRNA associations. (A) miRNA–gene associations (a directed graph); red nodes: up-regulated genes; blue nodes: down-regulated genes; purple nodes: miRNAs. The nodes are interconnected with arrowed edges indicating the direction of the association. (B) miRNA/gene/lncRNA associations; two types of nodes are depicted, also in different shapes. Rectangular nodes: target elements; circular nodes: regulatory elements; blue nodes: down-regulated lncRNAs; red notes: up-regulated lncRNAs; yellow nodes: transcription factors; purple nodes: miRNAs; green nodes: protein-coding genes. Three edge types indicate the relationships among the nodes in question; solid edges: regulatory relationships; dotted edges: binding or interaction; double-dashed edges: associations; edge colors: regulation direction; black edges: an increase in expression (positively E); purple edges: a decrease in expression (negatively E); orange edges: a decrease in function (negatively F); blue edges: a positive function (positively F); and red edges: an interaction between nodes (interact). Nodes with bold outlines: candidate biomarkers.
Figure 2. Network representation of the NSCLC-related gene, miRNA, and lncRNA associations. (A) miRNA–gene associations (a directed graph); red nodes: up-regulated genes; blue nodes: down-regulated genes; purple nodes: miRNAs. The nodes are interconnected with arrowed edges indicating the direction of the association. (B) miRNA/gene/lncRNA associations; two types of nodes are depicted, also in different shapes. Rectangular nodes: target elements; circular nodes: regulatory elements; blue nodes: down-regulated lncRNAs; red notes: up-regulated lncRNAs; yellow nodes: transcription factors; purple nodes: miRNAs; green nodes: protein-coding genes. Three edge types indicate the relationships among the nodes in question; solid edges: regulatory relationships; dotted edges: binding or interaction; double-dashed edges: associations; edge colors: regulation direction; black edges: an increase in expression (positively E); purple edges: a decrease in expression (negatively E); orange edges: a decrease in function (negatively F); blue edges: a positive function (positively F); and red edges: an interaction between nodes (interact). Nodes with bold outlines: candidate biomarkers.
Cancers 16 03729 g002
Cancers 16 03729 g003
Figure 3. Untargeted metabolomics in plasma EVs from NSCLC patients reveals key perturbed metabolic pathways. Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) was performed using Metaboanalyst v.6. The enriched pathways were ranked by significance, as indicated by the color scale (top ten pathways with p-values < 0.05).
Figure 3. Untargeted metabolomics in plasma EVs from NSCLC patients reveals key perturbed metabolic pathways. Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) was performed using Metaboanalyst v.6. The enriched pathways were ranked by significance, as indicated by the color scale (top ten pathways with p-values < 0.05).
Cancers 16 03729 g003
Cancers 16 03729 g004
Figure 4. (A) Relative-fold change (2−ΔΔCq) of miR-29a-3p in EVs from early-stage NSCLC patient samples in terms of relapse and survival, (B) Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS for NSCLC patients with respect to miR-29a-3p expression. ** p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 4. (A) Relative-fold change (2−ΔΔCq) of miR-29a-3p in EVs from early-stage NSCLC patient samples in terms of relapse and survival, (B) Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS for NSCLC patients with respect to miR-29a-3p expression. ** p ≤ 0.01.
Cancers 16 03729 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of clinical samples.
Table 1. Characteristics of clinical samples.
PatientAge (years)SmokingTumor Size (cm)Histological TypeTNMDisease StageRelapseDeathDFSOS
160-2.6SCCT1aN0M0IA1014.258.1
254yes1.8SCcT1bN0M0IA0051.651.6
347-7AdenoCAT2bN0M0IB0051.451.4
474-2SCCT1N0M0IA1015.051.2
567-4AdenoCAT2aN0M0IB1113.815.8
652yes8SCCT4N1M0IIIA1110.014.8
776yes3.8SCCT2aN2M0IIIA116.511.7
868yes4SCCT2aN0M0IB1114.026.1
973-1.8AdenoCAT1bN1M0IIB1131.540.4
1065-9SCCT4N1M0IIIA0048.248.2
1139no3AdenoCAT1cN0M0IA1035.447.5
1261yes3.5SCCT2aN0M0IB0047.447.4
1373yes5.5SCCT3N0M0IIB1047.247.2
1466yes4LCNECT3N1M0IIIA118.722.9
1575yes3AdenoCAT2aN2MOIIIA1112.136.1
1673no5.5SCCT3N0M0IIB1012.446.1
1759no4AdenoCAT2N1M0IIB1112.221.8
1848-1.2AdenoCAT1bN0M0IA0041.241.2
1967yes1AdenoCAT1aN0M0IA0040.940.9
2073-7.4SCCT4N0M0IIIA0131.831.8
2170-2.8SCCT1cN0M0IA0040.840.8
2264-3.4AdenoCAT2aN1M0IIB1111.429.0
2357yes2.1AdenoCAT1cN1MOIIB1038.238.2
2469yes3.4SCCT2aN2M0IIIA119.522.6
2563yes3.2AdenoCAT2aN0M0IB0037.837.8
2672yes2.8SCCT1cN0M0IA107.337.8
2762-3.5AdenoCAT2aN0M0IB0035.535.5
2872-2.5AdenoCAT1cN0M0IA0035.235.2
2975yes2.5SCCT1cN0M0IA0035.235.2
3079yes2.1AdenoCAT2aN0M0IB0033.033.0
3156yes3.1AdenoCAT2aN0M1 0033.033.0
3273no8.5SCCT4N0M0IIIA0033.033.0
TNM: tumor–nodes–metastasis classification system; DFS: disease-free survival; OS: overall survival.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bafiti, V.; Thanou, E.; Ouzounis, S.; Kotsakis, A.; Georgoulias, V.; Lianidou, E.; Katsila, T.; Markou, A. Profiling Plasma Extracellular Vesicle Metabotypes and miRNAs: An Unobserved Clue for Predicting Relapse in Patients with Early-Stage NSCLC. Cancers 2024, 16, 3729. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16223729

AMA Style

Bafiti V, Thanou E, Ouzounis S, Kotsakis A, Georgoulias V, Lianidou E, Katsila T, Markou A. Profiling Plasma Extracellular Vesicle Metabotypes and miRNAs: An Unobserved Clue for Predicting Relapse in Patients with Early-Stage NSCLC. Cancers. 2024; 16(22):3729. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16223729

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bafiti, Vivi, Eleni Thanou, Sotiris Ouzounis, Athanasios Kotsakis, Vasilis Georgoulias, Evi Lianidou, Theodora Katsila, and Athina Markou. 2024. "Profiling Plasma Extracellular Vesicle Metabotypes and miRNAs: An Unobserved Clue for Predicting Relapse in Patients with Early-Stage NSCLC" Cancers 16, no. 22: 3729. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16223729

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop