Next Article in Journal
Updates in Diagnostic Techniques and Experimental Therapies for Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
Previous Article in Journal
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cognition in Adults with Cancer: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recurrent Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Current Insights and Treatment Advances
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Laryngeal Papillomatosis

by
Jared Levinson
and
William Edward Karle
*
Department of Otolaryngology, Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2025, 17(6), 929; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060929
Submission received: 21 December 2024 / Revised: 28 February 2025 / Accepted: 1 March 2025 / Published: 10 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Benign and Malignant Neoplasms of the Head and Neck)

Simple Summary

Laryngeal papillomatosis is the most common benign disease of the larynx that affects both children and adults. It is caused by the human papillomavirus. While it is a benign disease, it can cause significant problems with the voice and breathing. The disease tends to be more aggressive when it presents in childhood and is difficult to manage because of its tendency to recur. The most common treatment is surgery, with other additional treatments available. This review aims to provide an overview of laryngeal papillomatosis and the various surgical and medical management options that are currently available or under investigation.

Abstract

Laryngeal papillomatosis and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis are caused by the human papillomavirus. It is characterized by papillomatous growths and is the most common benign disease of the larynx. Juvenile-onset RRP is characterized by more aggressive disease compared with adult-onset RRP. Patients often require frequent surgical procedures, with an increasing shift toward office-based treatment. A variety of surgical and adjuvant medical therapies are available with mixed responses. New targeted therapies and vaccines are currently under investigation as potential adjuncts in the management.

1. Introduction

Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP), also referred to as laryngeal papillomatosis (LP) when primarily involving the larynx, is the most common benign neoplasm of the larynx [1]. It is caused by the human papilloma virus (HPV), predominantly subtypes 6 and 11 [2,3]. While RRP is a benign disease, it remains challenging to treat with significant morbidity due to its high recurrence rates [1]. The incidence in the United States has previously been estimated to be 4.3 per 100,000 children and 1.8 per 100,000 adults but has recently been shown to be declining as a consequence of the creation and subsequent expansion of HPV vaccination [1].
RRP exhibits a bimodal distribution classified as juvenile-onset (J-RRP) and adult-onset (A-RRP). Compared with A-RRP, J-RRP is typically characterized as a more aggressive disease with higher rates of recurrence, often requiring frequent surgical interventions. J-RRP is thought to arise from vertical transmission during childbirth from infected genital mucosa, while A-RRP arises from sexual transmission [1].

2. HPV

To understand this disease, it is helpful to first appreciate the infective vector which causes it. HPV comprises a family of small double-stranded DNA viruses that infect the cutaneous and mucosal epithelium. Over 150 HPV types have been identified [4]. HPV types that infect the cutaneous epithelium cause common skin warts, while HPV types that infect the mucosal epithelium are further categorized as ‘high risk’ or ‘low risk’ based on their oncogenic potential [4].
High-risk HPV types are implicated in the development of cervical cancer, as well as oropharyngeal and anogenital cancer. The high-risk types include HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, with HPV 16 and 18 accounting for about 66% of cervical cancers [5]. Low-risk HPV types include HPV 6 and 11, which more frequently cause low-grade genital lesions, anogenital warts, and RRP [5]. HPV infection occurs at the basal lamina of the epithelium, and most infections are asymptomatic without any clinical manifestations. Despite the high incidence of infection, the majority resolve spontaneously in 1–2 years [5]. Those who develop persistent infections are most at risk for developing HPV-related cervical, anogenital, or oropharyngeal cancers [4,5,6].
HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection in both the United States and throughout the world. Prior to the introduction of the HPV vaccine, 79 million people were infected in the United States, with about 14 million new infections per year. Almost half of these infections were in people aged 15 to 24 years old [6].
In 2006, the quadrivalent HPV vaccine was introduced in the United States. Data throughout 2018 revealed an 86% decrease in the prevalence of HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18 among females 14 to 19 years old, and a 71% decrease in females 20 to 24 years old. A nine-valent HPV vaccine was introduced later in 2014 [7,8]. In the head and neck, 80% of oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is associated with HPV in the US [9]. Between 1988 and 2004, HPV-related OPSCC increased by 225%, while HPV-negative cancers declined by 50% [10].

3. Laryngeal Papillomatosis

The most dreaded manifestation of HPV infection within the head and neck region is cancer, but its benign presentation as papillomas can have significant consequences as well. Within the larynx, the clinical presentation depends on the extent and location of the papillomatous growths. In children, the characteristic triad of symptoms includes dysphonia, stridor, and dyspnea [11]. J-RRP represents a distinct form of the disease in comparison with A-RRP. LP is typically more aggressive in children, more expensive to treat, and exhibits higher recurrence rates compared with adults [12,13]. Specifically, children with aggressive disease require more frequent procedures and may be more likely to present with more distal disease, require tracheostomy, and experience complications [13,14,15,16,17,18]. It is important to note that adults can still present with aggressive disease. While there is no formal definition of what constitutes “aggressive” disease, a widely published definition includes one or more of the following: 10 or more total surgeries, 4 or more surgeries per year, distal spread to the trachea or beyond, or a need for tracheostomy at any point [13,14,15,16,17,18].
HPV 11 is typically thought to be associated with a greater risk of developing RRP and more severe presentations, which has been widely published [13,15,16,19,20,21,22]. However, there is evidence that age of onset is a more relevant factor than the HPV subtype [12,18]. When controlling for age, the HPV subtype was not strongly associated with disease severity, and the findings were more suggestive that age at diagnosis was more predictive of disease severity. Of patients who were diagnosed between the ages of 0 and 5 years, 80% experienced severe disease. In comparison, 60% of patients diagnosed between the ages of 5 and 10 years had severe disease, and 30% diagnosed after the age of 10 years had severe disease. The authors identified 5 years of age to be a critical age of diagnosis in predicting a severe disease course [18].
It is unclear why children are more likely to present with aggressive disease. While J-RRP is strongly associated with perinatal HPV exposure, few infants who are exposed to or infected with HPV go on to acquire RRP [23,24]. It is also currently unclear why some patients acquire RRP and others do not. Studies have explored the roles of genetic, immunologic, and degree of exposure in the development of RRP [22,25].
The critical period for the development of the immune system in children is ages 4–6 years old (Kovalenko). This coincides with the previously reported critical age at diagnosis for RRP that is associated with more severe disease [26]. Given HPV’s opportunistic behavior (as evidenced by increased HPV-related disease in immunodeficiencies), an immature immune system may explain why younger age at diagnosis has been associated with more severe disease [22]. Regarding genetic factors, certain HLA class II genes are upregulated in RRP, while specific haplotypes are associated with increased susceptibility to severe disease [22].
Cases of malignant transformation are rare but have been reported [27,28,29,30]. Cases of malignant transformation in children were more likely to have pulmonary involvement and a younger age of onset. In adults, dysplasia or malignant transformation was associated with older age of onset. Gender, smoking history, number of operations, and use of cidofovir were not associated with the development of dysplasia or malignant transformation [30]. HPV type has not been shown to be correlated with malignant transformation [31]. The only significant risk factor for malignant transformation is LP without demonstrable HPV DNA, and, thus, HPV typing should strongly be considered for laryngeal disease [31].
Transmission of HPV in children has been suggested to occur via three mechanisms: vertical transmission between a mother and newborn at birth via contact with the genital mucosa, vertical transmission in utero, and horizontal transmission via the child’s environment [22]. A large case–control study of 3033 Danish infants showed that the risk of J-RRP was 231.4 times higher in children whose mothers had genital warts during pregnancy compared with those whose mothers did not. This study also showed that the risk of RRP was doubled in spontaneous vaginal delivery lasting more than 10 h [32].
While cesarian section has been shown to reduce the transmission of viruses such as herpes simplex, hepatitis B, and HIV, it is unclear if there is any role in preventing vertical transmission of HPV [33]. Vertical transmission may still occur in utero or postpartum even in cases of cesarian section and can occur from sperm during fertilization [25,34,35]. Horizontal transmission may occur shortly after delivery through close physical contact with caregivers, relatives, and other environmental exposures that can transmit infection [22].

4. Operative Management

Once diagnosed, the mainstay of treatment is the surgical removal of papillomas. Eradication of disease remains difficult due to the propensity of these papillomas to recur [36]. There are a variety of surgical modalities for ablating papillomas, with the most widely used methods including laser, microdebrider, and coblation. Comparative studies have found no significant difference in recurrence trends between these modalities [37].
The carbon dioxide (CO2) laser is commonly used for laryngological procedures. The wavelength of the CO2 laser is 10,600 nm and is absorbed preferentially by water in soft tissues. The CO2 laser can be utilized to cut or ablate tissue [38]. It is imperative to adhere to proper laser safety protocols as airway fire is one of the most serious risks when using a laser. Different power settings and firing modes can be employed for a range of functions. A power of 4–8 W with non-continuous firing allows for more precision when working at the vocal fold level and has a lower level of collateral damage [38].
The potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser and TruBlue (A.R.C. Laser GmbH) laser are both considered photoangiolytic lasers that are absorbed preferentially by oxyhemoglobin. The KTP laser has a wavelength of 532 nm, while the TruBlue laser has a wavelength of 445 nm [39]. These lasers are considered to provide more selective ablation of highly vascularized tissues. The angiolytic nature of these lasers allows them to achieve better hemostatic control compared with other lasers [38,40,41]. However, these lasers can only be used as a fiber as opposed to the CO2 laser, which has the option of either a fiber or the use of a beam with a micromanipulator. A lower energy setting with an extended pulse width can be used to effectively coagulate papillomatous lesions and preserve the superficial lamina propria by reducing thermal injury [42].
Powered laryngeal shavers have been shown to be a safe and effective modality for endoscopic treatment of RRP in adults and children when used appropriately [43,44,45]. Compared with lasers, powered instruments avoid the risk of thermal injury and airway fire [46]. Various blade types and sizes are available. The Skimmer blade (Medtronic Xomed) can be used for more precise removal of papillomas near the vocal fold, while the Tricut blade (Medtronic Xomed) can be used to remove more bulky lesions. Speed settings vary from 600 to 1400 RPM, with slower speeds used for the rapid removal of large lesions and faster speeds for more precision near normal mucosa [44]. Hemostasis is often achieved with the application of epinephrine-soaked pledgets [43,44].
Radiofrequency coblation (coblator) has become increasingly utilized in a variety of otolaryngological procedures [47,48,49]. It has been used safely and effectively in both adult and pediatric patients with extensive laryngeal papillomatosis [50,51]. The benefits of radiofrequency coblation have been reported by some to include reduced blood loss, minimal damage to underlying tissues, decreased operation time, and a greater time interval between additional procedures compared with laser ablation [52]. Ultimately, the choice of instrument is guided by surgeon preference, as none has been shown to be superior [37].
Regardless of the method, when addressing papillomas that involve the vocal fold, care must be taken to remain superficial to the vocal ligament [25]. A subepithelial injection of saline, epinephrine, or lidocaine into the superficial lamina propria can be utilized to protect the vocal ligament from damage. There is a significant risk of anterior web formation when treating the bilateral sides of the anterior commissure, and this can be staged to avoid this complication [25].
Figure 1 demonstrates a patient who had too aggressive anterior commissure laser treatment. A consequence of this was a very large anterior glottic web. Should this be encountered, the web may be lysed in the midline and steroid-injected (Figure 2). If the web is not the full thickness of the vocal folds, it should be cut with cold steel to help prevent the return of the web during healing. Once healed the web should be significantly improved (Figure 3). Consideration should be given to the dilation of the glottis following lysis.
Although less common, care must also be taken not to disrupt the mucosa along the entirety of the posterior commissure. Should this occur, a patient is at great risk of developing posterior glottic stenosis (Figure 4). This should also be treated similarly to the anterior glottic web with midline lysis of the scar and injection of steroids, and dilation should always be performed in these cases (Figure 5). The combination of anterior or posterior glottic stenosis in the setting of a patient with papillomas can lead to significant airway obstruction and should be avoided in all cases with careful surgical attention (Figure 6).
Whenever there is laryngeal involvement, it is critical to evaluate the trachea and mainstem bronchi to evaluate for distal spread of disease. Jet ventilation should be avoided if possible to prevent theoretical distal seeding of the disease. A tracheostomy should also be avoided unless necessary to prevent papillomatous involvement of the stoma.
Management of LP has traditionally required surgical excision within the operating room. However, in more recent years, office-based procedures have provided an attractive alternative, with the goal of saving costs and time and avoiding the risks of general anesthesia (Figure 7 and Figure 8). Office-based laser therapy has been reported as a safe and effective treatment that is well tolerated in unsedated patients [53,54,55].
Office-based laser treatment of LP is less costly than in the operating room [56,57]; however, these reports also found that patients required more frequent office-based treatments, which may reduce its cost-effectiveness [56,58]. Not all patients are suitable candidates for office-based procedures, including those with severe disease burden or airway compromise. Appropriate patient selection based on expected tolerance is also an important consideration. Management in the operating room while under general anesthesia offers a more controlled environment and access to more specialized instruments. There is now more of a trend to treat patients in the OR when they originally present, with further treatment offered in the office to delay, sometimes indefinitely, a repeat operation.
A concern that applies to both in-office and operative management of papilloma is the growing concern for the risk of transmitting HPV to providers during procedures in which viral particles may be vaporized because of electrocautery or laser ablation of HPV-infected tissues [59]. There is increasing evidence that ablative procedures disperse HPV DNA particles into the environment [60,61], while the infectivity of HPV DNA particles in ablative plumes is unclear. The infectivity of laser plumes containing viral particles has been demonstrated with bovine papillomavirus (BPV) in animal models [62,63]. Some data suggest increased rates of HPV DNA in samples taken from providers performing laser treatment of warts, yet the rates remain comparable to those of the general population [59,64]. In a series of 12 patients with laryngeal papillomatosis treated with KTP laser, HPV was undetectable by PCR on the laser fibers used to treat them [65]. The available evidence demonstrates that HPV DNA can be dispersed during ablative procedures using laser and electrocautery, with uncertain infectious potential. Providers are, thus, at theoretically greater risk of HPV exposure, and best practice includes utilizing N95 masks and smoke evacuation systems to minimize this risk [60].

5. Medical Management

While the primary management of LP is surgical excision, adjuvant therapy is utilized to control the disease in up to 20% of patients [66]. Table 1 summarizes treatment options. There are no indications for when to use adjuvant therapies, but it is typically considered in cases where more frequent operative treatment is needed or if there is extralaryngeal involvement [67]. Cidofovir is an antiviral agent that inhibits viral replication. It is a nucleotide analog that is incorporated into viral DNA and inhibits viral DNA polymerases [68]. It is FDA-approved for the treatment of CMV retinitis in patients with AIDS but has been used off-label as an intravenous and intra-lesional adjuvant treatment for RRP since the 1990s. Initial studies evaluating its efficacy in treating RRP showed significant rates of disease remission with intralesional injections [69,70]. Cidofovir has also been documented to reduce viral load and modified Derkay scores [71]. Many studies published since its initial use in treating RRP have demonstrated positive results with minimal side effects [67]. However, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study showed that there was no statistically significant difference in disease severity between those who received cidofovir compared with placebo [72]. A Cochrane review concluded that there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support the efficacy of intra-lesional cidofovir in the treatment of RRP [73].
Despite the widespread use of cidofovir in treating RRP, concerns regarding its risk of nephrotoxicity, neutropenia, and possible oncogenicity were raised. In animal studies, cidofovir was found to be carcinogenic and teratogenic [74]. Current reports do not show evidence of long-term nephrotoxicity, neutropenia, or the development of dysplasia or malignancy related to the use of intralesional cidofovir [67,75]. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits angiogenesis by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) [76]. VEGF-A mRNA is highly expressed in RRP tissue samples compared with unaffected tissue, implicating its role in the disease process [77]. Initial case reports showed dramatic responses with systemic therapy in both adult and pediatric patients [78,79,80]. More recent systematic reviews suggest that intralesional and systemic bevacizumab is effective in decreasing disease burden and the need for frequent surgical intervention in adults and children [76,81,82]. Systemic administration is particularly well-suited for lesions that involve the tracheobronchial tree and are more difficult to access for surgical excision [67]. While bevacizumab has been shown to be well tolerated with minimal adverse effects, boxed warnings suggest an increased risk of gastrointestinal perforation, impaired wound healing, and hemorrhage [81,83].
Intralesional bevacizumab is frequently used within the larynx at a concentration of 25 mg/mL. Although it has previously been reported that there is a maximum FDA dose of 50 mg/kg [84], this drug is currently not FDA-approved and is used off-label for papillomas. A prior review showed results from studies that had total dosages of 1.25 mg to 100 mg [81]. While many studies show improvements in disease severity and voice outcomes, it is important to note that there are limitations when comparing results from these studies as treatment protocols, dosages, intervals, and outcomes varied widely. Furthermore, intralesional injections are utilized as an adjuvant to surgical intervention and have not been evaluated without the confounding effects of primary surgical treatment.
A consensus statement on the administration of systemic bevacizumab for RRP published in December 2024 provided a treatment algorithm regarding initial dosing, intervals, tapering, monitoring, and reintensification of therapy [85]. Prior to initiating treatment, patients should undergo chest CT, renal function tests, blood pressure checks, and pregnancy testing where applicable. The initial dose is 10 mg/kg IV, spaced at 3–4-week intervals. Disease burden should be assessed via laryngoscopy/bronchoscopy and patient-reported symptoms every 3–4 cycles. Chest CT should be repeated every 1–2 years.
These guidelines recommended that if no response is observed after 3–4 cycles, systemic administration should continue for another 3–4 cycles, followed by reassessment. In patients who respond well to treatment after 3–4 cycles, the dose can be tapered by increasing the time interval by 3–4 weeks in between each cycle, using periodic laryngoscopy/bronchoscopy and patient-reported symptoms to assess for the maintenance of disease response. The treatment duration is indefinite, but ultimately, bevacizumab should be administered at the lowest possible frequency needed to maintain control of the disease. Their review showed the mean time to recurrence after cessation of treatment was 5.4 months, with a rapid response to treatment when therapy resumed [85]. Repeated surgical procedures can have a significant impact on quality of life and expose patients to the risks of anesthesia and laryngeal surgery. Systemic bevacizumab offers an opportunity to potentially avoid repeated surgeries.
Table 1. Treatment options.
Table 1. Treatment options.
Treatment ModalityMechanismAdvantagesLimitationsEvidenceReferences
Surgical debulkingRemoval of lesions via microdebrider, laser, and coblatorMainstay of managing LP and airway obstructionFrequent procedures, risks of general anesthesia, and costN/AN/A
Office-based treatmentLaser ablation of lesions via transnasal flexible laryngoscopyDisease maintenance, avoid surgery and general anesthesia, and reduced costAbility to tolerate office-based laser, frequent procedures, and not suitable for severe disease or airway compromiseAverage time interval procedures: 10.59 months (OR) vs. 5.4 months (office); cost: USD 10,105 (OR) vs. USD 2081 (office)Chen et al., 2021 [58]
BevacizumabMonoclonal antibody blocking VEGF-A; intralesional and systemic administrationReduced frequency of surgical intervention; may address lesions on tracheobronchial treeFrequent infusions every 3–4 weeksProlonged surgical interval in 95% of patients (systemic) vs. 62% (intralesional)Pogoda et al., 2022 [82]
CidofovirInhibits viral DNA polymerase; intralesional injectionDecreased disease recurrence and severityLimited high-quality evidence to support its efficacyNo difference between cidofovir and placebo for disease severity, VHI, HRQoL, or number of proceduresChadha et al., 2012 [73]
HPV vaccinationAntibody- and cell-mediated immunity against HPV 6, 11, 16, 18 (quadrivalent), 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 (9-valent)Prevents HPV infection and HPV-mediated disease. As treatment: reduced frequency of surgical interventionLimited evidence of impact of national vaccination programs on rates of RRP; not approved for patients > 45 yearsMean ISI increased by 15.73 months after vaccination; mean number of procedures decreased by 4.43 per year after vaccinationPonduri et al., 2023 [86]
Immune checkpoint inhibitorsMonoclonal antibody targeting PD-1 (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab), PD-L1 (Avelumab)Potential for future non-surgical treatment optionsLimited evidence with few patients and mixed responses to treatment; ongoing clinical trialsPembrolizumab: partial response in 57% of patients; stable disease in 33% Nivolumab: reduction in disease burden in 2/2 patients Avelumab: improvement in disease burden in all patients; partial response in 56% of patients; no improvement in pulmonary diseaseCreelan et al., 2019 [87]; Allen et al., 2019 [88];
Pai et al., 2022 [89]
VHI: Voice Handicap Index; HRQoL: health-related quality of life; ISI: intersurgical interval.

6. HPV Vaccine

The greatest advancement in the medical management of this disease has not been treatment but, rather, prevention. In 2006, the quadrivalent HPV vaccination was first made available to the public, targeting HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18. In 2015, a nine-valent vaccine was released, targeting additional types 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. The HPV vaccine has also been proposed as potentially having a therapeutic effect in the treatment of RRP [90]. Theories suggest that both antibody- and cell-mediated immune responses may decrease the risk of recurrence and reinfection by inhibiting latent HPV at the surgical site [91,92]. A 2019 meta-analysis found that the use of the HPV vaccine as an adjuvant treatment for RRP reduced the number of surgical procedures [93]. A more recent systematic review in 2024 included new datasets that have since been published and also included two unpublished datasets, totaling 243 patients in the pooled sample [86]. The meta-analysis revealed that after vaccination with the quadrivalent or nine-valent HPV vaccine, the mean number of surgical procedures per year decreased by 4.43, and the mean intersurgical interval (ISI) increased by 15.73 months.
Vaccination against HPV is recommended for patients of all ages with RRP. However, it is currently only recommended by the CDC for patients aged 9 to 26 years, with consideration given up to 45 years based on discussion with the treating physician [94]. As a result, patients over 26 may encounter out-of-pocket costs. A study evaluating the efficacy of HPV vaccination in patients over the age of 45 revealed an increase in the ISI and a decrease in the number of procedures, consistent with previously published data [95]. This can aid clinicians when counseling patients outside the recommended age range on the efficacy of HPV vaccination, given its out-of-pocket cost.
The impact of national HPV vaccination programs on the incidence of RRP was investigated in a systematic review published in 2024, which showed a decrease in the incidence of J-RRP [96]. It included four studies from the United States, New Zealand, and Australia. National HPV programs were introduced in the United States in 2006, Australia in 2007, and New Zealand in 2008 [96]. In the United States, the incidence decreased from 2.0 per 100,000 in 2004–2005 to 0.5 in 2012–2013; in Australia, the incidence decreased from 0.16 per 100,000 in 2012 to 0.022 per 100,000 in 2016; and no significant decline in incidence was found in New Zealand [96]. The conclusions were limited by the small sample sizes (15–30 cases) and retrospective designs in the Australian and New Zealand studies. The United States study was a prospective cross-sectional design consisting of 576 cases across 26 tertiary medical centers in 23 states. This systematic review was the first to evaluate the incidence of J-RRP since the implementation of HPV vaccination programs and demonstrated an overall decline. It also indicated the need for more population-level data to better assess the impact that HPV vaccination programs have had on rates of RRP.

7. Future Directions

The work on improving and creating new vaccines continues and an ongoing phase 1/2 trial is evaluating DNA plasmid vaccines targeting the E6 and E7 proteins of HPV 6 and 11 [97]. Interim results have shown a decrease in the number of surgical interventions required compared with the year prior to administration, decreased severity, and a durable cellular response against HPV 6 and 11 [98]. While 5% of the population shows evidence of laryngeal HPV infection, only a very small portion of these patients develop RRP [99]. These patients typically have normally functioning immune systems and mount antibody responses to viral proteins, so it remains unclear why only some individuals develop papillomas [99]. Interest has focused on the role of immune pathways. The programmed death 1 (PD-1) and ligand (PD-L1) pathway facilitates tumor evasion of the immune system via T-cell suppression [99,100]. PD-1 is a T-cell receptor that suppresses T-cell function when activated by PD-L1 expressed on target cells [99]. PD-L1 expression has been observed in LP specimens along with infiltration of PD-1 T-lymphocytes [99,101]. The strongest expression of PD-L1 was observed in the basal papilloma layer; however, not all specimens expressed PD-L1 [99,101].
Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are monoclonal antibodies that block PD-1 and have been used to treat advanced head and neck cancer [100,102]. Few studies have evaluated the clinical utility of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in the treatment of LP. In one study from 2019, two adult patients with recurrent J-RRP were treated with nivolumab [87]. One patient experienced remission after 9 months of treatment; the second patient experienced an improvement in laryngeal disease but had a mixed response with pulmonary lesions, where some shrank, and others grew [87]. A phase II trial evaluated avelumab (NCT02859454), a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1 [88]. The results showed improvement in laryngeal disease across all 12 patients, but pulmonary disease did not respond [88]. Another phase II study of pembrolizumab for RRP (NCT02632344) included 21 patients with either A-RRP or J-RRP [89]. In total, 57% of patients experienced a partial response, and the mean number of procedures decreased by seven surgeries per year [89]. These preliminary findings suggest a potential for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in the management of LP but are currently not approved for use in this setting.
HIV protease inhibitors have demonstrated activity against HPV-mediated cervical carcinoma in vitro, with lopinavir being the most effective one identified [103]. A study of patients with cervical HPV-positive high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) treated with topical lopinavir/ritonavir showed no dysplasia in 63% of patients after 12 weeks of treatment [104]. RNA interference targeting E7 has also shown activity against cervical carcinoma in vitro via upregulation of p53 and retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, providing potential targeted gene therapy for HPV-mediated disease [105]. These potential therapies have demonstrated activity against HPV-mediated disease and may have the potential to treat RRP in the future.
One of the main challenges in evaluating the various treatment options for LP is the lack of prospective placebo-controlled trials with sufficient sample sizes. Treatment protocols and outcome measures vary widely, making it difficult to appropriately compare results across different studies. Further investigation carried out through multi-institutional studies with standardized protocols and outcome measures would aid in evaluating the various treatment options with larger samples.

8. Conclusions

RRP is the most common benign disease of the larynx, caused by HPV. It is notoriously challenging to treat due to its tendency to recur. Two distinct forms are recognized based on the age of diagnosis, with J-RRP representing a more aggressive disease. The mainstay of management is surgical excision with many different modalities utilized according to surgeon preference. Patients typically require frequent surgical procedures, and office-based laser treatment is useful in delaying repeat trips to the operating room in appropriately selected patients. Many adjuvant treatments are available with mixed responses but may be particularly suited for patients with distal disease that is not easily accessible for resection. Ongoing trials are exploring new vaccine strategies and targeted therapies that have the potential to improve control of LP in the future.

Author Contributions

J.L., reviewed the literature and drafted this manuscript; W.E.K., senior author and principal investigator. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Derkay, C.S.; Wiatrak, B. Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Review. Laryngoscope 2008, 118, 1236–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Benedict, J.J.; Derkay, C.S. Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A 2020 Perspective. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 2021, 6, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Donne, A.J.; Hampson, L.; Homer, J.J.; Hampson, I.N. The Role of HPV Type in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2010, 74, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Doorbar, J.; Quint, W.; Banks, L.; Bravo, I.G.; Stoler, M.; Broker, T.R.; Stanley, M.A. The Biology and Life-Cycle of Human Papillomaviruses. Vaccine 2012, 30, F55–F70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elissa Meites, M.M.; Julianne Gee, M.; Elizabeth Unger, P.M.; Lauri Markowitz, M. Human Papillomavirus. In Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases; Public Health Foundation: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Satterwhite, C.L.; Torrone, E.; Meites, E.; Dunne, E.F.; Mahajan, R.; Ocfemia, M.C.B.; Su, J.; Xu, F.; Weinstock, H. Sexually Transmitted Infections Among US Women and Men. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2013, 40, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rosenblum, H.G.; Lewis, R.M.; Gargano, J.W.; Querec, T.D.; Unger, E.R.; Markowitz, L.E. Declines in Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine-Type Infection Among Females after Introduction of Vaccine—United States, 2003–2018. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Petrosky, E.; Bocchini, J.A., Jr.; Hariri, S.; Chesson, H.; Curtis, C.R.; Saraiya, M.; Unger, E.R.; Markowitz, L.E.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine: Updated HPV Vaccination Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2015, 64, 300–304. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gribb, J.P.; Wheelock, J.H.; Park, E.S. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and the Current State of Oropharyngeal Cancer Prevention and Treatment. Del. J. Public Health 2023, 9, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaturvedi, A.K.; Engels, E.A.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Hernandez, B.Y.; Xiao, W.; Kim, E.; Jiang, B.; Goodman, M.T.; Sibug-Saber, M.; Cozen, W.; et al. Human Papillomavirus and Rising Oropharyngeal Cancer Incidence in the United States. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 4294–4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lepine, C.; Leboulanger, N.; Badoual, C. Juvenile Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: What Do We Know in 2024? Tumour Virus Res. 2024, 17, 200281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xi, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J.; Wang, G.; Gui, J.; Ni, X. Risk Factors for Aggressive Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis in Chinese Juvenile Patients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020, 140, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Doyle, D.J.; Gianoli, G.J.; Espinola, T.; Miller, R.H. Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Juvenile versus Adult Forms. Laryngoscope 1994, 104, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Omland, T.; Akre, H.; Lie, K.A.; Jebsen, P.; Sandvik, L.; Brøndbo, K. Risk Factors for Aggressive Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis in Adults and Juveniles. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Derkay, C.S. Task Force on Recurrent Respiratory Papillomas: A Preliminary Report. Arch. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 1995, 121, 1386–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Armstrong, L.R.; Derkay, C.S.; Reeves, W.C. Initial Results From the National Registry for Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Arch. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 1999, 125, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Draganov, P.; Todorov, S.; Todorov, I.; Karchev, T.; Kalvatchev, Z. Identification of HPV DNA in Patients with Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Using SYBR® Green Real-Time PCR. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2006, 70, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Buchinsky, F.J.; Valentino, W.L.; Ruszkay, N.; Powell, E.; Derkay, C.S.; Seedat, R.Y.; Uloza, V.; Dikkers, F.G.; Tunkel, D.E.; Choi, S.S.; et al. Age at Diagnosis, but Not HPV Type, Is Strongly Associated with Clinical Course in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Niyibizi, J.; Rodier, C.; Wassef, M.; Trottier, H. Risk Factors for the Development and Severity of Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 78, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Campisi, P.; Hawkes, M.; RN, K.S. The Epidemiology of Juvenile Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Derived from a Population Level National Database. Laryngoscope 2010, 120, 1233–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lépine, C.; Voron, T.; Berrebi, D.; Mandavit, M.; Nervo, M.; Outh-Gauer, S.; Péré, H.; Tournier, L.; Teissier, N.; Tartour, E.; et al. Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Aggressiveness: In Situ Study of the Level of Transcription of HPV E6 and E7. Cancers 2020, 12, 2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, S.-L.; Wang, W.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, F.-Z.; Zhang, J.; Ni, X. A Review of the Risk Factors Associated with Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Genetic, Immune and Clinical Aspects. World J. Pediatr. 2022, 18, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gerein, V.; Schmandt, S.; Babkina, N.; Barysik, N.; Coerdt, W.; Pfister, H. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-Associated Gynecological Alteration in Mothers of Children with Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis during Long-Term Observation. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2007, 31, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tenti, P. Perinatal Transmission of Human Papillomavirus from Gravidas with Latent Infections. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 93, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Derkay, C.S. Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 2001, 111, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qu, X.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, L.; Niu, Z.; Wang, J. High Recurrence Rate in Patients with Juvenile-Onset Respiratory Papillomatosis and Its Risk Factors. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2022, 279, 4061–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ling, S.; Cheng, Y.; Yau, P.A.; Yim, C.; Kwan, H.; Mok, T. Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis (RRP) of Tracheobronchial Tree Presenting as Lung Collapse with Malignant Transformation after a Decade. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2023, 45, 101904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Can, N.T.; Tretiakova, M.S.; Taxy, J.B. Natural History and Malignant Transformation in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Dysplasia and an Autopsy Review. Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 2015, 34, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Muhammad Fauzi, H.G.; Mohan Singh, A.S.; Abdul Rahim, S.; Chooi, L.L.; Ramasamy, V.; Mohamad Pakarul Razy, N.H.; Mohamad, I. Malignant Transformation of Juvenile Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Gulf J. Oncol. 2021, 1, 79–81. [Google Scholar]
  30. Karatayli-Ozgursoy, S.; Bishop, J.A.; Hillel, A.; Akst, L.; Best, S.R.A. Risk Factors for Dysplasia in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis in an Adult and Pediatric Population. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2016, 125, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, L.; Cheng, A.; Fang, T.; Huang, C.; Liao, C.; Chang, J.T.; Li, H. High Incidence of Malignant Transformation of Laryngeal Papilloma in Taiwan. Laryngoscope 2008, 118, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silverberg, M. Condyloma in Pregnancy Is Strongly Predictive of Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 101, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Winckworth, L.C.; Nichol, R. Question 2: Do Caesarean Sections Reduce the Maternal-Fetal Transmission Rate of Human Papillomavirus Infection? Arch. Dis. Child. 2010, 95, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Larson, D.A.; Derkay, C.S. Epidemiology of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. APMIS 2010, 118, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lai, Y.M.; Yang, F.P.; Pao, C.C. Human Papillomavirus Deoxyribonucleic Acid and Ribonucleic Acid in Seminal Plasma and Sperm Cells. Fertil. Steril. 1996, 65, 1026–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Perkins, J.A.; Inglis, A.F.; Richardson, M.A. Iatrogenic Airway Stenosis With Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Arch. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 1998, 124, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, S.; Shao, J. Surgical Outcome of Different Surgical Modalities for Adult Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2023, 143, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rosen, C.M.D.; Simpson, C.B.M.D. Principles of Laser Microlaryngoscopy. In Operative Techniques in Laryngology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 85–89. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hess, M.M.; Fleischer, S.; Ernstberger, M. New 445 Nm Blue Laser for Laryngeal Surgery Combines Photoangiolytic and Cutting Properties. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2018, 275, 1557–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hock, K.; Kennedy, A.; Howell, R.; Friedman, A.; de Alarcon, A.; Khosla, S. Surgery and Adjuvant Therapy Improve Derkay Scores in Adult and Pediatric Respiratory Papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 2022, 132, 2420–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hung, W.-C.; Lo, W.-C.; Fang, K.-M.; Cheng, P.-W.; Wang, C.-T. Longitudinal Voice Outcomes Following Serial Potassium Titanyl Phosphate Laser Procedures for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2021, 130, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burns, J.A.; Friedman, A.D.; Lutch, M.J.; Hillman, R.E.; Zeitels, S.M. Value and Utility of 532 Nanometre Pulsed Potassium-Titanyl-Phosphate Laser in Endoscopic Laryngeal Surgery. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2010, 124, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Patel, R.S.; Mackenzie, K. Powered Laryngeal Shavers and Laryngeal Papillomatosis: A Preliminary Report. Clin. Otolaryngol. Allied Sci. 2000, 25, 358–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Patel, N.; Rowe, M.; Tunkel, D. Treatment of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis in Children with the Microdebrider. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2003, 112, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El-Bitar, M.A.; Zalzal, G.H. Powered Instrumentation in the Treatment of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Arch. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2002, 128, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pasquale, K.; Wiatrak, B.; Woolley, A.; Lewis, L. Microdebrider Versus CO2 Laser Removal of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomas: A Prospective Analysis. Laryngoscope 2003, 113, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bortnick, D.P. Coblation: An Emerging Technology and New Technique for Soft-Tissue Surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2001, 107, 614–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Arya, A.K.; Donne, A.; Nigam, A. Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study of Coblation Tonsillotomy versus Coblation Tonsillectomy on Postoperative Pain in Children. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2005, 30, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Atef, A.; Mosleh, M.; El Bosraty, H.; El Fatah, G.A.; Fathi, A. Bipolar Radiofrequency Volumetric Tissue Reduction of Inferior Turbinate: Does the Number of Treatment Sessions Influence the Final Outcome? Am. J. Rhinol. 2006, 20, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Timms, M.S.; Bruce, I.A.; Patel, N.K. Radiofrequency Ablation (Coblation): A Promising New Technique for Laryngeal Papillomata. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2007, 121, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rachmanidou, A.; Modayil, P.C. Coblation Resection of Paediatric Laryngeal Papilloma. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2011, 125, 873–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hao, F.; Yue, L.; Yin, X.; Wang, X.; Shan, C. Low-Temperature Radiofrequency Coblation Reduces Treatment Interval and Post-Operative Pain of Laryngotracheal Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20192005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zeitels, S.M.; Burns, J.A.; Franco, R.A.; Hillman, R.E.; Dailey, S.H.; Anderson, R.R. Office-Based Treatment of Glottal Dysplasia and Papillomatosis with the 585-NM Pulsed Dye Laser and Local Anesthesia. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2004, 113, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Koufman, J.A.; Rees, C.J.; Frazier, W.D.; Kilpatrick, L.A.; Wright, S.C.; Halum, S.L.; Postma, G.N. Office-Based Laryngeal Laser Surgery: A Review of 443 Cases Using Three Wavelengths. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2007, 137, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Filauro, M.; Vallin, A.; Sampieri, C.; Benzi, P.; Gabella, G.; De Vecchi, M.; Ioppi, A.; Mora, F.; Peretti, G. Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Comparing in-Office and Operating Room Treatments. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2024, 44, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Miller, A.J.; Gardner, G.M. In-Office vs. Operating Room Procedures for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017, 96, E24–E28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rees, C.J.; Postma, G.N.; Koufman, J.A. Cost Savings of Unsedated Office-Based Laser Surgery for Laryngeal Papillomas. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2007, 116, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, S.; Connors, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Vieira, D.; Shapira-Galitz, Y.; Garber, D.; Amin, M.R. Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Office versus Operating Room: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2021, 130, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Yu, J.; Wang, J.; Tu, Q.; Zhu, X. Prevalence of HPV Infections in Surgical Smoke Exposed Gynecologists. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2021, 94, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cox, S.V.; Dobry, A.S.; Zachary, C.B.; Cohen, J.L. Laser Plume From Human Papillomavirus–Infected Tissue: A Systematic Review. Dermatol. Surg. 2020, 46, 1676–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Palma, S.; Gnambs, T.; Crevenna, R.; Jordakieva, G. Airborne Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Transmission Risk during Ablation Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Environ. Res. 2021, 192, 110437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Garden, J.M. Viral Disease Transmitted by Laser-Generated Plume (Aerosol). Arch. Dermatol. 2002, 138, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Garden, J.M.; O’Banion, M.K.; Shelnitz, L.S.; Pinski, K.S.; Bakus, A.D.; Reichmann, M.E.; Sundberg, J.P. Papillomavirus in the Vapor of Carbon Dioxide Laser-Treated Verrucae. JAMA 1988, 259, 1199–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kofoed, K.; Norrbom, C.; Forslund, O.; Møller, C.; Frøding, L.; Pedersen, A.; Markauskas, A.; Blomberg, M.; Baumgartner-Nielsen, J.; Madsen, J.; et al. Low Prevalence of Oral and Nasal Human Papillomavirus in Employees Performing CO2-Laser Evaporation of Genital Warts or Loop Electrode Excision Procedure of Cervical Dysplasia. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2015, 95, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dodhia, S.; Baxter, P.C.; Ye, F.; Pitman, M.J. Investigation of the Presence of HPV on KTP Laser Fibers Following KTP Laser Treatment of Papilloma. Laryngoscope 2018, 128, 926–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ivancic, R.; Iqbal, H.; deSilva, B.; Pan, Q.; Matrka, L. Current and Future Management of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 2018, 3, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bertino, G.; Pedretti, F.; Mauramati, S.; Filauro, M.; Vallin, A.; Mora, F.; Crosetti, E.; Succo, G.; Peretti, G.; Benazzo, M. Recurrent Laryngeal Papillomatosis: Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies. Literature Review and Multicentre Retrospective Study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2023, 43 (Suppl. 1), S111–S122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lea, A.P.; Bryson, H.M. Cidofovir. Drugs 1996, 52, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Van Cutsem, E.; Janssens, J.; Rutgeerts, P.; Vantrappen, G.; Snoeck, R.; Van Ranst, M.; Fiten, P.; Opdenakker, G.; De Clercq, E.; Geboes, K. Successful Treatment of a Squamous Papilloma of the Hypopharynx-esophagus by Local Injections of (S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)Cytosine. J. Med. Virol. 1995, 45, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Snoeck, R.; Wellens, W.; Desloovere, C.; Van Ranst, M.; Naesens, L.; De Clercq, E.; Feenstra, L. Treatment of Severe Laryngeal Papillomatosis with Intralesional Injections of Cidofovir [(S)-1-(3-Hydroxy-2-Phosphonylmethoxypropyl)Cytosine]. J. Med. Virol. 1998, 54, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mikolajczak, S.; Quante, G.; Weissenborn, S.; Wafaisade, A.; Wieland, U.; Lüers, J.C.; Klussmann, J.P.; Beutner, D. The Impact of Cidofovir Treatment on Viral Loads in Adult Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2012, 269, 2543–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. McMurray, J.S.; Connor, N.; Ford, C.N. Cidofovir Efficacy in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2008, 117, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chadha, N.K.; James, A. Adjuvant Antiviral Therapy for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 12, CD005053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mylan Institutional LLC. Cidofovir Injection Solution Package Insert; Mylan Institutional LLC: Morgantown, WV, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hoesli, R.C.; Thatcher, A.L.; Hogikyan, N.D.; Kupfer, R.A. Evaluation of Safety of Intralesional Cidofovir for Adjuvant Treatment of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. JAMA Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2020, 146, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ryan, M.A.; Leu, G.R.; Upchurch, P.A.; Tunkel, D.E.; Walsh, J.M.; Boss, E.F. Systemic Bevacizumab (Avastin) for Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Systematic Review. Laryngoscope 2021, 131, 1138–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vargas, S.O.; Healy, G.B.; Rahbar, R.; Folkman, J.; Tan, X.; McGill, T.J.; Brown, L.F. Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor–A in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2005, 114, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nagel, S.; Busch, C.; Blankenburg, T.; Schütte, W. Behandlung Der Respiratorischen Papillomatose—Kasuistik Zur Systemischen Therapie Mit Bevacizumab. Pneumologie 2009, 63, 387–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mohr, M.; Schliemann, C.; Biermann, C.; Schmidt, L.-H.; Kessler, T.; Schmidt, J.; Wiebe, K.; Müller, K.-M.; Hoffmann, T.K.; Groll, A.H.; et al. Rapid Response to Systemic Bevacizumab Therapy in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Oncol. Lett. 2014, 8, 1912–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zur, K.B.; Fox, E. Bevacizumab Chemotherapy for Management of Pulmonary and Laryngotracheal Papillomatosis in a Child. Laryngoscope 2017, 127, 1538–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gately, U.E.; Zhang, N.; Karle, W.E.; Lott, D.G. Adjuvant Intralesional Bevacizumab in Pediatric and Adult Populations with Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Systematic Review. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2024, 133, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pogoda, L.; Ziylan, F.; Smeeing, D.P.J.; Dikkers, F.G.; Rinkel, R.N.P.M. Bevacizumab as Treatment Option for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Systematic Review. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2022, 279, 4229–4240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Genentech, Inc. Bevacizumab Solution for Intravenous Infusion Package Insert; Genentech, Inc.: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ablanedo-Terrazas, Y.; Estrada-Camacho, O.; Alvarado-de la Barrera, C.; Ramírez-García, A.; Tona-Acedo, G.; Bross-Soriano, D.; Schimelmitz-Idi, J. Efficacy of cidofovir versus bevacizumab in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Acta Otorrinolaringol. Esp. (Engl. Ed.) 2022, 73, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Best, S.R.; Bock, J.M.; Fowler, N.B.; Raabe, E.H.; Klein, A.M.; Laetsch, T.W.; McClellan, K.; Rinkel, R.N.P.M.; Saba, N.F.; Sidell, D.R.; et al. A Consensus Statement on the Administration of Systemic Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 2024, 134, 5041–5046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ponduri, A.; Azmy, M.C.; Axler, E.; Lin, J.; Schwartz, R.; Chirilă, M.; Dikkers, F.G.; Yang, C.J.; Mehta, V.; Gangar, M. The Efficacy of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination as an Adjuvant Therapy in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 2023, 133, 2046–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Creelan, B.C.; Ahmad, M.U.; Kaszuba, F.J.; Khalil, F.K.; Welsh, A.W.; Ozdemirli, M.; Grant, N.N.; Subramaniam, D.S. Clinical Activity of Nivolumab for Human Papilloma Virus-Related Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Oncologist 2019, 24, 829–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Allen, C.T.; Lee, S.; Norberg, S.M.; Kovalovsky, D.; Ye, H.; Clavijo, P.E.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Schlegel, R.; Schlom, J.; Strauss, J.; et al. Safety and Clinical Activity of PD-L1 Blockade in Patients with Aggressive Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pai, S.I.; Muniappan, A.; Park, J.C.; Friedman, A.D.; Campbell, N.P.; Krantz, S.B.; Shin, K.-Y.; Song, P.; Nocon, C.C.; Carroll, T.L.; et al. A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab for HPV-Associated Papilloma Patients with Laryngeal, Tracheal, And/or Pulmonary Involvement. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gallagher, T.Q.; Derkay, C.S. Pharmacotherapy of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: An Expert Opinion. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2009, 10, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Makiyama, K.; Hirai, R.; Matsuzaki, H. Gardasil Vaccination for Recurrent Laryngeal Papillomatosis in Adult Men. J. Voice 2017, 31, 104–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kin Cho Goon, P.; Scholtz, L.; Sudhoff, H. Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis (RRP)–Time for a Reckoning? Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 2017, 2, 184–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rosenberg, T.; Philipsen, B.B.; Mehlum, C.S.; Dyrvig, A.-K.; Wehberg, S.; Chirilǎ, M.; Godballe, C. Therapeutic Use of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine on Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 219, 1016–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/hpv/hcp/recommendations.html (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  95. Ivancic, R.; Freeman, T.; de Silva, B.; Forrest, A.; Kim, B.; Matrka, L. Adjuvant Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Recurrent Respiratory Papilloma Patients Older than 45. Laryngoscope 2024, 134, 3226–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jacobsen, I.-M.; Carlander, A.-L.F.; Aakilde, M.; von Buchwald, C. Trends in the Incidence and Prevalence of Juvenile-Onset Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Following Implementation of National HPV Vaccination Initiatives: A Systematic Review. Acta Otolaryngol. 2024, 145, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Inovio Pharmaceuticals. INO-3107 with Electroporation (EP) in Participants with HPV-6- and/or HPV-11-Associated Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis (RRP). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04398433 (accessed on 28 January 2025).
  98. Mau, T.; Amin, M.R.; Belafsky, P.C.; Best, S.R.; Friedman, A.D.; Klein, A.M.; Lott, D.G.; Paniello, R.C.; Pransky, S.M.; Saba, N.F.; et al. Interim Results of a Phase 1/2 Open-Label Study of INO-3107 for HPV-6 and/or HPV-11-Associated Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 2023, 133, 3087–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ahn, J.; Bishop, J.A.; Roden, R.B.S.; Allen, C.T.; Best, S.R.A. The PD-1 and PD-L1 Pathway in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 2018, 128, E27–E32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ferris, R.L.; Blumenschein, G.; Fayette, J.; Guigay, J.; Colevas, A.D.; Licitra, L.; Harrington, K.; Kasper, S.; Vokes, E.E.; Even, C.; et al. Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1856–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, T.; Greenberg, M.; Wentland, C.; Sepe, B.; Bowe, S.; Diercks, G.; Huynh, T.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Schlegel, R.; Kodack, D.; et al. PD-L1 Expression and CD8+ Infiltration Shows Heterogeneity in Juvenile Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017, 95, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Burtness, B.; Harrington, K.J.; Greil, R.; Soulières, D.; Tahara, M.; de Castro, G.; Psyrri, A.; Basté, N.; Neupane, P.; Bratland, Å.; et al. Pembrolizumab Alone or with Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab with Chemotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (KEYNOTE-048): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study. Lancet 2019, 394, 1915–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hampson, L.; Kitchener, H.C.; Hampson, I.N. Specific HIV Protease Inhibitors Inhibit the Ability of HPV16 E6 to Degrade P53 and Selectively Kill E6-Dependent Cervical Carcinoma Cells in Vitro. Antivir. Ther. 2006, 11, 813–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hampson, L.; Maranga, I.O.; Masinde, M.S.; Oliver, A.W.; Batman, G.; He, X.; Desai, M.; Okemwa, P.M.; Stringfellow, H.; Martin-Hirsch, P.; et al. A Single-Arm, Proof-Of-Concept Trial of Lopimune (Lopinavir/Ritonavir) as a Treatment for HPV-Related Pre-Invasive Cervical Disease. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sima, N.; Wang, W.; Kong, D.; Deng, D.; Xu, Q.; Zhou, J.; Xu, G.; Meng, L.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S.; et al. RNA Interference against HPV16 E7 Oncogene Leads to Viral E6 and E7 Suppression in Cervical Cancer Cells and Apoptosis via Upregulation of Rb and P53. Apoptosis 2008, 13, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Large anterior glottic web with small amount of papilloma on right posterior commissure.
Figure 1. Large anterior glottic web with small amount of papilloma on right posterior commissure.
Cancers 17 00929 g001
Figure 2. One week post-op following laser ablation of laryngeal papilloma and lysis of anterior glottic web.
Figure 2. One week post-op following laser ablation of laryngeal papilloma and lysis of anterior glottic web.
Cancers 17 00929 g002
Figure 3. Three months post-op following laser ablation of laryngeal papilloma and lysis of anterior glottic web. The majority of the anterior glottic web is resolved, but there is already regrowth of papillomas.
Figure 3. Three months post-op following laser ablation of laryngeal papilloma and lysis of anterior glottic web. The majority of the anterior glottic web is resolved, but there is already regrowth of papillomas.
Cancers 17 00929 g003
Figure 4. Significant papillomatous growths throughout supraglottis and severe posterior glottic web.
Figure 4. Significant papillomatous growths throughout supraglottis and severe posterior glottic web.
Cancers 17 00929 g004
Figure 5. Two months post-op after lysis of posterior glottic web and ablation of papillomas. Web has significantly improved, and there is already regrowth of papillomas.
Figure 5. Two months post-op after lysis of posterior glottic web and ablation of papillomas. Web has significantly improved, and there is already regrowth of papillomas.
Cancers 17 00929 g005
Figure 6. Significant posterior glottic web with papillomas causing near-complete obstruction of the airway.
Figure 6. Significant posterior glottic web with papillomas causing near-complete obstruction of the airway.
Cancers 17 00929 g006
Figure 7. Scattered papillomas through glottis with true blue laser beginning to ablate papilloma on the posterior right vocal fold.
Figure 7. Scattered papillomas through glottis with true blue laser beginning to ablate papilloma on the posterior right vocal fold.
Cancers 17 00929 g007
Figure 8. Completion of in-office laser treatment. Papillomas are either fully ablated or blanched white with the expectation of necrosis over the following week.
Figure 8. Completion of in-office laser treatment. Papillomas are either fully ablated or blanched white with the expectation of necrosis over the following week.
Cancers 17 00929 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Levinson, J.; Karle, W.E. Laryngeal Papillomatosis. Cancers 2025, 17, 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060929

AMA Style

Levinson J, Karle WE. Laryngeal Papillomatosis. Cancers. 2025; 17(6):929. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060929

Chicago/Turabian Style

Levinson, Jared, and William Edward Karle. 2025. "Laryngeal Papillomatosis" Cancers 17, no. 6: 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060929

APA Style

Levinson, J., & Karle, W. E. (2025). Laryngeal Papillomatosis. Cancers, 17(6), 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060929

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop