Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .

Games, Volume 16, Issue 3

2025 June - 11 articles

Cover Story: This study examines how information about incentive properties and procedural transparency affect student behavior and perceived fairness in school admissions. Using a lab experiment, the Gale–Shapley and Boston mechanisms, which are both common in the US and EU, are compared. The impact of information about the mechanism itself, optimal strategies, or both is tested. The results show that strategic and full information boost truth-telling and stability under Gale–Shapley mechanisms. However, equilibrium strategy adoption under the Boston mechanism is unchanged. Unexpectedly, the Boston mechanism improves perceived fairness, challenging matching theory assumptions. These findings highlight the importance of transparency and suggest that eliminating justified envy alone may not ensure fairness or reduce litigation risks. View this paper
  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list .
  • You may sign up for email alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.

Articles (11)

  • Article
  • Open Access
1,211 Views
20 Pages

5 June 2025

Health care systems rely on geographical boundaries that secure financial stability and adequate planning. Quality differences across regions often arise for efficiency reasons, causing patient flows if mobility is free. In this paper, a theoretical...

  • Article
  • Open Access
2 Citations
1,280 Views
15 Pages

5 June 2025

In symmetric games with externalities across coalitions, we investigate how three players form coalitions using two solutions: n, which is a focal prediction of coalition structure in a class of noncooperative coalitional bargaining games, an...

  • Feature Paper
  • Article
  • Open Access
963 Views
13 Pages

4 June 2025

Establishing a partnership necessitates agreeing on how to divide future profits or losses. We consider parties who wish to contract on the division of uncertain future profits. We propose to divide profits according to the Raiffa–Kalai–S...

  • Article
  • Open Access
1,393 Views
39 Pages

4 June 2025

This paper experimentally investigates the relationship between an investor and a project manager. Project managers choose from a pool of projects, the success probabilities of which are uncertain. Investors can change projects, but also have to chan...

  • Feature Paper
  • Article
  • Open Access
2,358 Views
21 Pages

Mobility Comparisons: Theoretical Definitions and People’s Perceptions

  • Michele Bernasconi,
  • Giulio Cinquanta,
  • Valentino Dardanoni and
  • Vincenzo Prete

8 May 2025

Comparing mobility is an important but controversial issue. In this paper, we argue that in a specific and relevant case, there exists a univocal and non-controversial definition of greater (exchange) mobility that allows for unambiguous comparisons....

  • Feature Paper
  • Article
  • Open Access
3,151 Views
21 Pages

6 May 2025

Human cooperation is ubiquitous and instinctive. We are among the most cooperative species on Earth. Still, research mostly focuses on why we cooperate, instead of understanding why some of us do not do so. The public goods game can be used to map hu...

  • Article
  • Open Access
1,814 Views
46 Pages

23 April 2025

Media content is an important privately supplied public good. While it has been shown that contributions to a public good crowd out other contributions in many cases, the issue has not been thoroughly studied for media markets yet. We show that in a...

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Games - ISSN 2073-4336