Next Article in Journal
Development of a Cofactor Balanced, Multi Enzymatic Cascade Reaction for the Simultaneous Production of L-Alanine and L-Serine from 2-Keto-3-deoxy-gluconate
Previous Article in Journal
Atmospheric Pressure Plasma for Diesel Particulate Matter Treatment: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heterogeneous Catalysts Using Strontium Oxide Agglomerates Depositing upon Titanium Plate for Enhancing Biodiesel Production

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan
3
Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010030
Submission received: 16 December 2020 / Revised: 25 December 2020 / Accepted: 25 December 2020 / Published: 30 December 2020

Abstract

:
Strontium oxide (SrO) is an effective catalyst for transesterification. SrO powder that is firmly deposited onto a light titanium plate (TiO2_P), denoted as SrO/TiO2_P, can be reinforced by forming strontium titanate (SrTiO3) at the interface. Exposed SrO agglomerates can promote subsequent continuous transesterification process. In this work, conversion efficiency and production of biodiesel from olive oil on SrO/TiO2_P is investigated. The as-designed SrO/TiO2_P was followed by dip-coating and heat treatment. The physical properties of SrO/TiO2_P were verified through ASTM D3359; the chemical structures before and after transesterification, were respectively identified by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. A focused microwave heating system was utilized for transesterification. In the optimized sample SrO/TiO2_P (x) (x = 0.5 M), SrO firmly bonds with TiO2_P and forms the SrTiO3 structure. With the support of TiO2_P, the tested oil with SrO agglomerates subsequently reacts with SrO under microwave heating. The biodiesel conversion rate reaches 87.7% after a reaction time of 4 min, while the biodiesel product has an average of 39.37 MJ/kg of combustion heat and less than 1 vol% of water content. The as-designed SrO/TiO2_P (0.5) thus has great potential for biodiesel production and is promising with high stability in particular for a continuous fluid flow system.

Graphical Abstract

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Titanium powder is formed into a TiO2 plate (TiO2_P) as a load-bearable support and designed to integrate with catalytic SrO agglomerates.
  • The synergic effect of SrO/TiO2_P is realized by forming SrTiO3 phase at their interface and SrO agglomerates upon the surface.
  • By applying focused microwave heating, the exposed SrO agglomerates and olive oil are effectively interacted by transesterification reaction.
  • The quality of the as-produced biodiesel is examined by the characteristic Raman peak, conversion rate, combustion heat, and water content.
  • The used SrO/TiO2_P is mostly re-cyclable for subsequent uses, which reduced the wastes when the biodiesel is produced.

1. Introduction

It has been noted that circular economy where nothing is wasted and where natural resources are managed sustainably and biodiversity is protected [1,2]. In the recent development, waste management originated on the realization of a circular economy is eventually to reduce, reuse, and recycle wastes [3]. Alternatively, due to the economic benefits, one of green energies using a recycled resource has attracted more and more attention [4,5]. In the past decades, a significant portion of the energy demand for electricity generation has been met through the combustion of fossil fuels. The emission of hazardous substances such as NOx, HC, smoke, CO, and SOx is widely concerned. Biodiesel is an eco-friendly alternative; it can be prepared from waste oil [6,7] or less economically used plants [8,9,10] without changing the existing engines or generators [11,12]. As reported from Brazil, Germany, France, the United States of America, and Belgium, biodiesel is considered to have the unprecedented potentiality for endurable renewable energy applications in the future [13,14,15].
In fact, biodiesel is one of the promising alternatives as a kind of biofuels, especially when non-edible feedstocks are used in the production process [16]. Currently, there are many methods that have been provided for the generation of biodiesel resources [16,17]. For examples, they can be made by direct use and blending of raw oil [18], micro-emulsions [19], thermal cracking [20], and transesterification [16,21,22]. For the direct use and blending of raw oil, a condition of liquid nature-portability is applied for a heat content of ~80% from diesel fuel, which is relatively spectacular. However, because it easily deteriorates and loses its volatility, it is difficult to consider for practical use [18]. Micro-emulsions are considered to be a colloidal equilibrium dispersion of an optically isotropic fluid microstructure with a size usually in the range of 1–150 nm formed naturally from two kinds of immiscible fluids and one or even more ionic or non-ionic amphiphile substances [19,23]. However, when using this method, the cetane number and energy content are insufficient that make it not suitable for the subsequent application, wherein an irregular injector needle may cause stickiness and insufficient fluidity, leading to incomplete combustion [19]. Transesterification mainly works as the interaction between a solid fat or liquid oil and alcohol under a catalyst used to generate glycerol and esters [24,25]. Additionally, by the selection of microwave heating process, less reaction time and purer products can be achieved [26,27]. For example, the microwave-assisted reaction rate is enhanced by an extremely high value of around five to one thousand times comparing with traditional heating methods [28,29]. Therefore, transesterification with the assistance of microwave heating highly focuses on reliability and high cetane number that indicates a fast fuel burning process and makes somewhat flammable; it is thus an efficient way to prepare an energy resource.
In various transesterification reactions, homogeneous acidic catalysts [30], and alkaline catalysts [30,31] are commonly used. However, these methods are sensitive to impurities found in oils such as free fatty acids and water [32]. For instances, liquid acid and base catalysts are corrosive and difficult to be recycled (i.e., homogeneous catalysts such as H2SO4 and KOH). The production cost is greatly increased by the complicated processing steps and costly anticorrosive facilities. In addition, large amounts of waste catalysts and water are formed, which have seriously polluted our environment. Moreover, potassium hydroxide catalysts have a characteristic of good solubility to be used as biodiesel fuel and its common byproduct, glycerin, makes it difficult to be purified and therefore lowers their practical efficiency [32,33,34]. The lifetimes of the engine and exhaust system are likely shortened by burning alkali and acid contaminated fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) products [35,36]. Therefore, to overcome the technical shortcomings associated with conventional catalysts for the production of biodiesel, a great deal of research has been conducted to develop heterogeneous catalysts [37]. A solution for these problems has been found in the application of heterogeneous catalysts such as alkali metal oxides as neat or loaded on the support. Their advantages over homogeneous catalysts refer to easy separation from the reaction mixture and the possibility to be reused, selectivity and longer catalyst lifetimes [38,39]. Since recently, the heterogeneous catalysts have been improved by loading a metal onto the catalyst surface to increase its hydrophobicity, which prevents the absorption of generated water during the reaction and contributes to the catalyst stability [40].
Since the transesterification reaction involves the presence of alcohol, it is worthwhile to determine its quantity with respect to the other reactant or oil. A proper ratio of oil: methanol in 1:6 has been developed [41]. In addition, a 3 wt% of catalyst as SrO in terms of oil weight has been particularly used [16,42]. For most supported alkali catalysts, the active ingredients are easily corroded by methanol and they exhibit short catalyst lifetimes. For examples, BaO is noxious and can be dissolved by methanol [43]; MgO has low activity in transesterification of vegetable oils to biodiesel [44]; and CaO provides a slow reaction rate and it takes about 2 h to reach a state of equilibrium [45]. On the other hand, SrO takes some advantages: it can catalyze many chemical reactions, such as oxidative coupling of methane, selective oxidation of propane, nitroaldol reactions, and mixed reactions. Further, it is insoluble in methanol, vegetable oils, and fatty acid methyl ester. Therefore, SrO is relatively suitable for our study [38].
With an increasing demand for transesterification reaction efficiency, SrO has been designed to be deposited upon bead- or plate-like supports. For examples, SrO particles were deposited into SiO2 composite, followed by microwave heating for biodiesel production [38]. The strong adhesion of SrO on silica beads would allow the use of the catalyst in a continuous flow microwave system facilitating production of large quantities of biodiesel. Similar approaches have been developed using activated carbon [46], Al2O3 [47] as the support for biodiesel production, in particular for the transesterification reaction from e.g., waste cooking oil. Our previous studies used a highly porous and calcinated scaffold that provides load-bearable support for a continuous process, while the calcinated SrO catalyst, as it is well distributed inside the porous matrix, could extend its surface contact area with the reactants. In these studies, a microwave heating system for the transesterification reaction was particularly introduced to increase the reaction efficiency [17].
In this study, SrO powder deposited upon a titanium plate is designed. The titanium plate is chosen as the support owing to likely formation of strontium titanate (SrTiO3) at their interface after heat treatment. The as-formed SrO upon TiO2 plate is then examined to be load-bearable during the transesterification process. The production and quality of biodiesel are also assessed. Thereafter, a transesterification reaction mechanism based upon the assessments is proposed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Physical Properties of the Surface of SrO/TiO2_P (x)

Surface morphologies of SrO/TiO2_P (x) (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 0.7 M) were respectively shown in Figure 1a–d; the top-right images were taken from EDS element mapping, while the red color is the distribution of the element Sr. The results indicated that the coverage of Sr element increased with the added concentration of Sr-containing solution. Surface morphology of SrO clusters exhibited a broccoli shape aggregated structure.
XRD patterns of SrO/TiO2_P (x) (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 0.7 M) were respectively shown in Figure 1e. Note that according to JCPDS card No. 06-0520, the cubic-SrO can be found in the 2θ diffraction range of 30 to 65°, corresponding to (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222); according to JCPDS card No. 35-0734, the cubic-SrTiO3 can be found in the 2θ diffraction range of 23° and 73° [48], corresponding to (100), (110), (111), (200), (211), (220), and (300). The results indicated that for SrO/TiO2_P (x), SrO structure was found on all the surfaces, whereas SrTiO3 could only be found on lower concentrations, i.e., x = 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 M. Based on the XRD pattern found in SrO/TiO2_P (0.7), the peaks for cubic-SrO were much significant, therefore the pattern for cubic-SrTiO3 (i.e., under the coverage of cubic-SrO structure) was most likely shaded by the coverage of SrO aggregates [49]. The results correspond well with the surface morphologies presented in Figure 1a–d.
In Figure 1f, the surface roughness of SrO/TiO2_P (x) was measured. The profiles showed that their roughness increased with the addition of SrO aggregates. However, for SrO/TiO2_P (0.7), the coverage of SrO aggregates was significant that reduced the surface area or therefore the average roughness.

2.2. Chemical Analysis on the Surfaces of SrO/TiO2_P (x)

In Figure 2a, XPS survey spectra of SrO/TiO2_P (x) showed the presence of Sr, Ti, C, and O elements. Note that the adsorbed C, O-containing species is minor, therefore only Sr 3d, Ti 2p, and O 1s spectra are studied for SrO/TiO2_P (x) before the transesterification reaction, whereas for SrO/TiO2_P (x) after the reaction Sr 3d, C 1s, and O 1s spectra are studied owing to the surface of TiO2_P is covered by the reactants and products.
In Figure 2b, Sr 3d spectra for SrO/TiO2_P (x) were deconvoluted into Sr 3d5/2 and Sr 3d3/2 at binding energies (BEs) of 132.9 (peak (1)) and 134.6 eV (peak (2)) with the difference of 1.7 eV. The intensity and the area of Sr 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 spectra increased with the addition of concentrations. In Figure 2c, Ti 2p spectra were deconvoluted into Ti 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 at 458.6 (peak (3)) and 464.3 eV (peak (4)) with the difference of 5.7 eV, indicated that Ti4+ is the dominant surface chemical state, which corresponded to the formation of TiO2 or probably SrTiO3 phase. The intensity and area of Ti 2p spectra decreased with the addition of SrO concentrations. In Figure 2d, O 1s spectra were deconvoluted into BEs peaked at 529.2 eV (peak (5)) for SrTiO3, 530.5 eV (peak (6)) for SrO, and 532.0 eV (peak (7)) for M-OH. Note that the peaks (3) and (5) represent the presence of SrTiO3, which exhibit obvious as SrO coverage is minor [50]. In addition, M-OH species may derivate from the metal-hydroxide group during the preparation process in the ambient atmosphere [51].

2.3. Biodiesel Conversion for Products

Based on the evaluation of surface morphologies, XRD patterns, surface roughness, and XPS spectra of SrO/TiO2_P (x), SrO/TiO2_P (0.5) is an optimized sample for subsequent studies.
In Figure 3a, XPS survey spectra of SrO/TiO2_P (0.5), after the transesterification reaction time of 1, 2, 3, and 4 min (i.e., the duration for microwave heating), showed the major presence of Sr, C, and O elements. Note that after the reactions, the surfaces of TiO2_P is covered by the reactants and products. In Figure 3b, Sr 3d spectra for SrO/TiO2_P (x) showed similar peaks and BEs with SrO/TiO2_P (0.5) in Figure 2b. The results indicated that the structure SrO still remains after the reaction time. The intensity and the area of Sr 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 spectra significantly decreased with the reaction time of 4 min, indicating the addition of reactants and products. In Figure 3c, C 1s spectra were deconvoluted into three component spectra with the peaks 3′ at 284.8 eV (C-C), 4′ at 287.1 eV (C-O), and 5′ at 289.2 eV (O-C=O) [17]. The peaks intensity roughly increased with the addition of reaction time, except for the reaction time of 4 min. The main chemical contributions of C 1s peaks for biodiesel (FAME) compounds correspond to peaks 3′ and 5′. In addition, the spectrum of FAME (a methyl ester) has the characteristic -O-CH3 peak 6′ [52] at 287.1 eV. In Figure 3d, O 1s spectra were deconvoluted into five peaks, in which the peak 6′ at 530.5 eV is correlated with Sr-O, and the peaks 7′ at 531.0 eV with C-O (or C 1s at 287.1 eV), 9′ at 532.8 eV with C=O [53], and 10′ at 533.7 eV with O-C=O (or C 1s at 289.2 eV). The latter three component peaks represent the formation of FAME. The peak 8′ at 532.0 eV is correlated with M-OH, corresponding with the peak 7 in Figure 2d. Overall, the chemical analysis by XPS, before and after the transesterification reaction and reaction time, is almost interrelated.
In Figure 4a, Raman spectra of olive oil before and after transesterification reaction were taken. The peak at 1655 cm−1 is frequently used as the indicator of FAME production [54,55]. By taking the peak as the reference, as the quantity of FAME production increased, the intensity of 1655 cm−1 reduced with the increasing reaction time; as estimated in Figure 4a, the relative reduction in intensities from 24, 30, 30 to 41% with respect to the reaction time of 1, 2, 3, and 4 min was observed. In Figure 4b, the conversion efficiency of olive oil to biodiesel reached 87.7% after 4 min from the onset of the reaction; however, the relative increase in biodiesel conversion, as shown in lines, reached a maximum of ~10% after 3 min of the reaction time, but sharply dropped to ~2% after 4 min of the reaction time. It indicates two possibilities: (1) a reaction time over 3 min may result in an optimal increased rate of biodiesel conversion; (2) the conversion of olive oil into biodiesel near SrO agglomerates (or therefore at the oil/SrO interface) may reach a reaction limit.
The quality of as-produced biodiesel was measured. In Figure 4c, its combustion heat ranged from 39–42 MJ/kg with an average value of 39.37 MJ/kg, as compared with a general value of 42 MJ/kg for a general diesel [56]. In Figure 4d, the water content of the as-produced biodiesel was also estimated; its value was slightly higher than that specified in both EN 14214 and ASTM D6751 standards [57,58]. Nevertheless, by improving the storage and delivery procedures, it should be very likely to eliminate water content in biodiesel. In addition, oil with a high acid value tends to generate non-esterified fatty acids in the biodiesel products, which can deteriorate equipment components. In the case about waste cooking oil (WCO), the high percentage of water molecules in WCOs may inhibit the catalyst activity and the ability of methanol to separate triglycerides from WCOs. Moreover, the high quantity of non-esterified species in the products of methanol, biodiesel, and crude glycerol makes the solution sticky and increasingly reduces the biodiesel conversion rate with reaction time.

2.4. Proposed Reaction Mechanism and Application

By taking SrO/TiO2_P (0.5) as the example and reacting with olive oil by focused microwave heating for 1 to 4 min, the reaction mechanism of transesterification process, followed by batch biodiesel production is presumably proposed. Firstly, as shown in Figure 5a, SrO particles form agglomerates or clusters upon TiO2_P (0.5), which are resistant to subsequent microwave heating and transesterification process. In Figure 5b, at the interface between SrO agglomerates and olive oil, biodiesel conversion is performed by an effective microwave heating that is characterized by XPS studies before and after the reaction. The structure of SrTiO3 binds the SrO agglomerates with TiO2_P and SrO particles reaction with olive oil under microwave heating. In Figure 5c, the quality of the as-produced biodiesel, FAME, is examined by the characteristic Raman peak at 1655 cm−1, conversion rate, heat combustion heat, and water content and reported as a promising biodiesel through this production method. In addition, the by-products can be collected for other uses. In Figure 5d, by acetone or ethanol cleaning under ultrasonic vibration at 10 min, the used SrO/TiO2_P (0.5) can be re-used for succeeding transesterification processes, re-starting from Figure 5a, which becomes an innovative design as a re-cyclable and productive material. The information related recyclability of the catalyst could be found in our previous studies [16].

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Preparation of SrO Powder Deposited upon a Titanium Plate (SrO/TiO2_P)

Ti powder with a particle size of ~45 μm (Zhongrui Material Technology Corp., Tainan, Taiwan) was used. A Ti plate could be formed by the P/M method [17,59]. As illustrated in Figure 6a (1)–(4), for one plate, Ti powder of 0.5 g was compacted into a cylindrical disc of ~10 mm in diameter and ~7 mm in thickness; the compression stress was 200 MPa. The as-compacted sample is denoted as TiO2_cp. Then, SrO metal precursors were dip-coated on TiO2_cp. Especially, Sr complexions were prepared by mixing strontium nitrate (Sr(NO3)2, 99%, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and deionized water (DI water) with 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 0.7 M SrO metal precursors. Afterward, 100 μL of citric acid (C6H8O7) was added for every 1 mL of the as-prepared solution. These mixed solutions were used for subsequent dip-coating of SrO-containing solution on TiO2_cp with a speed of 50 mm/min. The pre-coated samples, denoted as SrO/TiO2_cp (x) (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 0.7 M), were dried at 80 °C for 20 min and then heat-treated at 1000 °C for 3 h. The final products are denoted as SrO/TiO2_P (x) (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 0.7 M).

3.2. Quality Assessment of SrO_TiO2_P (x)

In Figure 6a (5), surface morphology of SrO/TiO2_P (x) were sputtered with a layer of Pt and then characterized by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JSM-7000, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV, under a chamber vacuum of 4.15 × 10−3 Pa. Crystalline structure of SrO_TiO2_P (x) was determined using X-ray diffraction with CuKα radiation (XRD, D8 Discover, Bruker, Germany). In Figure 6a (6), chemical composition of SrO_TiO2_P (x), before and after transesterification reaction, were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, PHI 5000, Versa Probe II, ULVAC-PHI, Incorporate,, Chigasaki, Japan) and Raman spectrometer with a confocal microscope (Renishaw, Gloucestershire, UK). For the former, SrO_TiO2_P (x) were scanned with an exposure time of 10 sec over an area of 1 μm × 1 μm, using a 50X objective. Ten consecutive measurements on different samples were averaged. All spectra were normalized using the peak fit software. The chemical bonds on the surfaces of SrO_TiO2_P (x) were respectively characterized. The functionalities of constituent elements (i.e., Sr 3d and O 1s for the catalyst SrO, Ti 2p for TiO2_P, and C 1s and O 1s for the reactants and products) were curve-fitted using the software Origin and related data information in order to clarify the formation of the esterification reaction. For the latter, Raman spectra were obtained using He-Ne and diode lasers with an excitation wavelength of 785 nm. All Raman spectra were normalized using the PeakFit software. An air-cooled CCD was used as the detector and the incident power was ~3 mW.

3.3. Transesterification Reaction Measurement and Energy Conversion

As illustrated in Figure 6b (7)–(10), the catalysis of SrO_TiO2_P (x) in transesterification reaction was evaluated using olive oil (Taiwan Sugar Corp., Taiwan) as the reactant. In the experiment, the olive oil was mixed with methanol in a volume ratio of 1:6 and ~3 wt % of SrO catalyst in SrO_TiO2_P (x) and introduced into a built-in batch unit with a modified transesterification system, containing a microwave oven chamber with the capacity of ~15 mL. When microwave heating (i.e., for 1, 2, 3, or 4 min) was applied, the evaporated methanol and water were simultaneously cooled down to maintain the constancy of oil-to-methanol ratio by preventing methanol from the evaporative loss. Finally, the products were collected in a container.
Gas chromatography equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID, GC-2014, Shimadzu, Japan) was employed to determine and verify the conversion efficiency of olive oil to biodiesel via the transesterification reaction. Note that the use of focused microwave heating tends to reduce the required power and time for the conversion, and thus decrease the output temperature from the reaction system.
The combustion heat of biodiesel was measured by bomb calorimeter (Model 1341, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA) in accordance with the ASTM D240. After standardization with benzoic acid, samples with 0.5 g from each fuel were burned in the bomb. All measurements were repeated six times.
The water content in biodiesel was measured by Karl Fischer titrator (C30S Karl Fisher titrator, Zurich, Switzerland). The highest accuracy of moisture determination is equivalent to a relative standard deviation of 1.48%. Other parameters (e.g., extraction time) have little or no effect on improving the accuracy of moisture determination.
The samples was cleaned on EtOH or Acetone aqueous (Ultrasonic, DC-300H, Delta, Taiwan) under ultrasonic vibration (40 kHz) at 10 min.

4. Conclusions

Titanium powder can be formed into a TiO2 plate (TiO2_P) as a load-bearable support and designed to integrate with catalytic SrO agglomerates (SrO). The synergic effect of SrO agglomerates with TiO2 plate (SrO/TiO2_P) is realized by forming SrTiO3 phase at their interface and most of the exposed and dispersed SrO agglomerates on the upper part are in full contact with olive oil. By applying effective focused microwave heating, the transesterification reaction process is carried out in a batch mode. Then, before and after the transesterification process, the optimized surface of SrO/TiO2_P (0.5) is characterized by XPS study, so that the reactions can be interpreted. The quality of the as-produced biodiesel is examined by the characteristic Raman peak, conversion rate, combustion heat, and water content. The report is promising, however, there is still room for effort in the biodiesel production process. Moreover, the by-products derived from the reactions can be collected for other applications, while the used SrO/TiO2_P can be cleaned and mostly re-cyclable for subsequent uses. This innovative and re-cyclable design can thus promote production efficiency of biodiesel.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and W.-H.W.; methodology, W.-H.W.; software, H.L. and W.-H.W.; formal analysis, H.L. and W.-H.W.; investigation, W.-H.W.; data collection, H.L. and W.-H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L. and J.-D.L.; writing—review and editing, B.-H.C. and J.-D.L.; supervision, B.-H.C.; project administration, J.-D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (grant number: MOST 108-2218-E-006-054-MY3 and 109-2811-E-006-531-MY2).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olabi, A.G. Circular economy and renewable energy. Energy 2019, 181, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Astolfi, V.; Astolfi, A.L.; Mazutti, M.A.; Rigo, E.; Di Luccio, M.; Camargo, A.F.; Dalastra, C.; Kubeneck, S.; Fongaro, G.; Treichel, H. Cellulolytic enzyme production from agricultural residues for biofuel purpose on circular economy approach. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 42, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huang, B.; Wang, X.; Kua, H.; Geng, Y.; Bleischwitz, R.; Ren, J. Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 129, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rastogi, R.P.; Pandey, A.; Larroche, C.; Madamwar, D. Algal green energy–R&D and technological perspectives for biodiesel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 2946–2969. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anto, S.; Mukherjee, S.S.; Muthappa, R.; Mathimani, T.; Deviram, G.; Kumar, S.S.; Verma, T.N.; Pugazhendhi, A. Algae as green energy reserve: Technological outlook on biofuel production. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shachi, S.; Venkatramanan, V.; Ram, P. Sustainable Green Technologies for Environmental Management; Springer: Singapore, 2019; ISBN 978-981-13-2772-8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sharma, P.K.; Kuinkel, H.; Shrestha, P.; Poudel, S. Use of acetylene as an alternative fuel in IC engine. Mech. Confab. 2012, 1, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xin, C.; Addy, M.M.; Zhao, J.; Cheng, Y.; Ma, Y.; Liu, S.; Mu, D.; Liu, Y.; Chen, P.; Ruan, R. Waste-to-biofuel integrated system and its comprehensive techno-economic assessment in wastewater treatment plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, Y.; Doustgani, A.; Salehi, A.; Nemati, M.; Ghasemi, A.; Koohshekan, O.; Jamali, D.H. The economic evaluation of establishing a plant for producing biodiesel from edible oil wastes in oil-rich countries: Case study Iran. Energy 2020, 213, 118760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fawaz, E.G.; Salam, D.A. Preliminary economic assessment of the use of waste frying oils for biodiesel production in Beirut, Lebanon. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 637–638, 1230–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aydin, H. Scrutinizing the combustion, performance and emissions of safflower biodiesel-kerosene fueled diesel engine used as power source for a generator. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 117, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aydın, S. Detailed evaluation of combustion, performance and emissions of ethyl proxitol and methyl proxitol-safflower biodiesel blends in a power generator diesel engine. Fuel 2020, 270, 117492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Masiero, G. Developments of biofuels in Brazil and East Asia: Experiences and challenges. Rev. Bras. Polit. Int. 2011, 54, 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ecofys. Technical Assistance in Realisation of the 2018 Report on Biofuels Sustainability; Ecofys–A Navigant Company: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2019; p. 141. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bušić, A.; Kundas, S.; Morzak, G.; Belskaya, H.; Mardetko, N.; Šantek, M.I.; Komes, D.; Novak, S.; Šantek, B. Recent trends in biodiesel and biogas production. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 56, 152–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, H.; Liao, J.D.; Yang, J.W.; Hsu, W.D.; Liu, B.H.; Chen, T.C.; Sivashanmugan, K.; Gedanken, A. Continuous waste cooking oil transesterification with microwave heating and strontium oxide catalyst. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2018, 41, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, H.; Liao, J.D.; Lee, M.H.; Liu, B.H.; Fu, W.E.; Sivashanmugan, K.; Juang, Y.D. Der Strontium oxide deposited onto a load-bearable and porous titanium matrix as dynamic and high-surface-contact-area catalysis for transesterification. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Benjumea, P.; Agudelo, J.; Agudelo, A. Basic properties of palm oil biodiesel-diesel blends. Fuel 2008, 87, 2069–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fernando, S.; Hanna, M. Development of a novel biofuel blend using ethanol-biodiesel-diesel microemulsions: EB-diesel. Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 1695–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jahirul, M.I.; Rasul, M.G.; Chowdhury, A.A.; Ashwath, N. Biofuels production through biomass pyrolysis–A technological review. Energies 2012, 5, 4952–5001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tantirungrotechai, J.; Thepwatee, S.; Yoosuk, B. Biodiesel synthesis over Sr/MgO solid base catalyst. Fuel 2013, 106, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, X.; He, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, S. Transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel using SrO as a solid base catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2007, 8, 1107–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abbaszaadeh, A.; Ghobadian, B.; Omidkhah, M.R.; Najafi, G. Current biodiesel production technologies: A comparative review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2012, 63, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Laskar, I.B.; Deshmukhya, T.; Bhanja, P.; Paul, B.; Gupta, R.; Chatterjee, S. Transesterification of soybean oil at room temperature using biowaste as catalyst; an experimental investigation on the effect of co-solvent on biodiesel yield. Renew. Energy 2020, 162, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Al-Saadi, A.; Mathan, B.; He, Y. Esterification and transesterification over SrO–ZnO/Al2O3 as a novel bifunctional catalyst for biodiesel production. Renew. Energy 2020, 158, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Falowo, O.A.; Oloko-Oba, M.I.; Betiku, E. Biodiesel production intensification via microwave irradiation-assisted transesterification of oil blend using nanoparticles from elephant-ear tree pod husk as a base heterogeneous catalyst. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2019, 140, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sharma, A.; Kodgire, P.; Kachhwaha, S.S. Biodiesel production from waste cotton-seed cooking oil using microwave-assisted transesterification: Optimization and kinetic modeling. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 116, 109394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nomanbhay, S.; Ong, M.Y. A review of microwave-assisted reactions for biodiesel production. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mirzaei, A.; Neri, G. Microwave-assisted synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures for gas sensing application: A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 237, 749–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, D.W.; Park, Y.M.; Lee, K.Y. Heterogeneous base catalysts for transesterification in biodiesel synthesis. Catal. Surv. Asia 2009, 13, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vicente, G.; Martínez, M.; Aracil, J. Integrated biodiesel production: A comparison of different homogeneous catalysts systems. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 92, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, A.; He, B.; Thompson, J.; van Gerpen, J. Process optimization of biodiesel production using alkaline catalysts. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2006, 22, 597–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Srivastava, A.; Prasad, R. Triglycerides-based diesel fuels. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2000, 4, 111–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Soriano, N.U.; Venditti, R.; Argyropoulos, D.S. Biodiesel synthesis via homogeneous Lewis acid-catalyzed transesterification. Fuel 2009, 88, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, C.-Y.; Ma, L. Influences of water content in feedstock oil on burning characteristics of fatty acid methyl esters. Processes 2020, 8, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gülüm, M.; Bilgin, A. Regression models for predicting some important fuel properties of corn and hazelnut oil biodiesel-Diesel fuel blends. Exergetic Energ. Environ. Dimens. 2018, 829–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chouhan, A.P.S.; Sarma, A.K. Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 4378–4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tangy, A.; Pulidindi, I.N.; Gedanken, A. SiO2 Beads decorated with SrO nanoparticles for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using microwave irradiation. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 3151–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, H.; Liu, F.; Ma, X.; Wu, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, S.; Helian, Y. Catalytic performance of strontium oxide supported by MIL–100(Fe) derivate as transesterification catalyst for biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 180, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Thangaraj, B.; Solomon, P.R.; Muniyandi, B.; Ranganathan, S.; Lin, L. Catalysis in biodiesel production–A review. Clean Energy 2019, 3, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Koberg, M.; Abu-Much, R.; Gedanken, A. Optimization of bio-diesel production from soybean and wastes of cooked oil: Combining dielectric microwave irradiation and a SrO catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Faungnawakij, K.; Yoosuk, B.; Namuangruk, S.; Krasae, P.; Viriya-empikul, N.; Puttasawat, B. Sr-Mg mixed oxides as biodiesel production catalysts. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2012, 4, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Martinez-Guerra, E.; Gude, V.G. Transesterification of used vegetable oil catalyzed by barium oxide under simultaneous microwave and ultrasound irradiations. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 88, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dossin, T.F.; Reyniers, M.F.; Berger, R.J.; Marin, G.B. Simulation of heterogeneously MgO-catalyzed transesterification for fine-chemical and biodiesel industrial production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2006, 67, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kouzu, M.; Hidaka, J.S. Transesterification of vegetable oil into biodiesel catalyzed by CaO: A review. Fuel 2012, 93, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shobhana-Gnanaserkhar; Asikin-Mijan, N.; AbdulKareem-Alsultan, G.; Sivasangar-Seenivasagam; Izham, S.M.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Biodiesel production via simultaneous esterification and transesterification of chicken fat oil by mesoporous sulfated Ce supported activated carbon. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 141, 105714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fadhil, A.B.; Aziz, A.M.; Altamer, M.H. Optimization of methyl esters production from non-edible oils using activated carbon supported potassium hydroxide as a solid base catalyst. Arab. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2018, 25, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Xuewen, W.; Zhiyong, Z.; Shuixian, Z. Preparation of nano-crystalline SrTiO3 powder in sol-gel process. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2001, 86, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bagherisereshki, E.; Tran, J.; Lei, F.; AuYeung, N. Investigation into SrO/SrCO3 for high temperature thermochemical energy storage. Sol. Energy 2018, 160, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vasquez, R.P. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of Sr and Ba compounds. J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenomena 1991, 56, 217–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fuentes, S.; Chávez, E.; Padilla-Campos, L.; Diaz-Droguett, D.E. Influence of reactant type on the Sr incorporation grade and structural characteristics of Ba1-xSrxTiO3 (x = 0–1) grown by sol-gel-hydrothermal synthesis. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 8823–8831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Montero, J.M.; Isaacs, M.A.; Lee, A.F.; Lynam, J.M.; Wilson, K. The surface chemistry of nanocrystalline MgO catalysts for FAME production: An in situ XPS study of H2O, CH3OH and CH3OAc adsorption. Surf. Sci. 2016, 646, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Fereidooni, L.; Tahvildari, K.; Mehrpooya, M. Trans-esterification of waste cooking oil with methanol by electrolysis process using KOH. Renew. Energy 2018, 116, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ghesti, G.F.; De Macedo, J.L.; Braga, V.S.; De Souza, A.T.C.P.; Parente, V.C.I.; Figuerêdo, E.S.; Resck, I.S.; Dias, J.A.; Dias, S.C.L. Application of Raman spectroscopy to monitor and quantify ethyl esters in soybean oil transesterification. JAOCS J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2006, 83, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mollaeian, K.; Wei, S.; Islam, M.R.; Dickerson, B.; Holmes, W.E.; Benson, T.J. Development of an online raman analysis technique for monitoring the production of biofuels. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 4112–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sivaramakrishnan, K. Determination of higher heating value of biodiesels. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2011, 3, 7981–7987. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fregolente, P.B.L.; Fregolente, L.V.; Wolf MacIel, M.R. Water content in biodiesel, diesel, and biodiesel-diesel blends. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2012, 57, 1817–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lin, C.; Tsai, S. Production of biodiesel from chicken wastes by various alcohol-catalyst combinations. J. Energy South. Afr. 2015, 26, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Duz, V.A.; Moxson, V.S. The direct powder rolling process for producing titanium and titanium alloy foils, sheets and plates. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2005, 4, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM morphologies from the surfaces of SrO_TiO2_P (x), x = (a) 0.1, (b) 0.3, (c) 0.5, and (d) 0.7. (e) XRD patterns and (f) surface roughness of SrO_TiO2_P (x) were measured.
Figure 1. SEM morphologies from the surfaces of SrO_TiO2_P (x), x = (a) 0.1, (b) 0.3, (c) 0.5, and (d) 0.7. (e) XRD patterns and (f) surface roughness of SrO_TiO2_P (x) were measured.
Catalysts 11 00030 g001
Figure 2. XPS studies of SrO_TiO2_P (x) (x = 0.1, 0.3. 0.5, or 0.7) before transesterification process were demonstrated: (a) Wide-scan XPS spectra and (b) curve-fitted XPS spectra for Sr 3d, (c) Ti 2p, and (d) O 1s. The curve-fitted peaks are respectively assigned at: (1) 132.9 eV, Sr 3d5/2, (2) 134.6 eV, Sr 3d3/2, (3) 458.6 eV, Ti 2p3/2, (4) 464.3 eV, Ti 2p1/2, (5) 529.2 eV, Sr-Ti, (6) 530.5 eV, Sr-O, and (7) 532.0 eV, loosely bound hydroxide groups.
Figure 2. XPS studies of SrO_TiO2_P (x) (x = 0.1, 0.3. 0.5, or 0.7) before transesterification process were demonstrated: (a) Wide-scan XPS spectra and (b) curve-fitted XPS spectra for Sr 3d, (c) Ti 2p, and (d) O 1s. The curve-fitted peaks are respectively assigned at: (1) 132.9 eV, Sr 3d5/2, (2) 134.6 eV, Sr 3d3/2, (3) 458.6 eV, Ti 2p3/2, (4) 464.3 eV, Ti 2p1/2, (5) 529.2 eV, Sr-Ti, (6) 530.5 eV, Sr-O, and (7) 532.0 eV, loosely bound hydroxide groups.
Catalysts 11 00030 g002
Figure 3. XPS studies of SrO_TiO2_P (0.5) after transesterification process with different reaction time (t, t = 1, 2, 3, or 4 min) were demonstrated: (a) wide-scan XPS spectra and (b) curve-fitted XPS spectra with different reaction time for (b) Sr 3d, (c) C 1s, and (d) O 1s. The curve-fitted peaks are respectively assigned at: (1) 132.9 eV, Sr 3d5/2, (2) 134.6 eV, Sr 3d3/2, (3) 284.8 eV, C-C, (4) 287.1 eV, C-O, (5) 289.2 eV, O=C-O, (6) 530.5 eV, Sr-O, (7) 531.0 eV, C-O, (8) 532.0 eV, M-OH, (9) 532.8 eV, C=O, and (10) 533.7 eV, O-C=O.
Figure 3. XPS studies of SrO_TiO2_P (0.5) after transesterification process with different reaction time (t, t = 1, 2, 3, or 4 min) were demonstrated: (a) wide-scan XPS spectra and (b) curve-fitted XPS spectra with different reaction time for (b) Sr 3d, (c) C 1s, and (d) O 1s. The curve-fitted peaks are respectively assigned at: (1) 132.9 eV, Sr 3d5/2, (2) 134.6 eV, Sr 3d3/2, (3) 284.8 eV, C-C, (4) 287.1 eV, C-O, (5) 289.2 eV, O=C-O, (6) 530.5 eV, Sr-O, (7) 531.0 eV, C-O, (8) 532.0 eV, M-OH, (9) 532.8 eV, C=O, and (10) 533.7 eV, O-C=O.
Catalysts 11 00030 g003
Figure 4. For SrO/TiO2_P (0.5) after transesterification process with different reaction time (t, t = 0 (pure), 1, 2, 3, or 4 min), followed by different chemical analyses, (a) the characteristic Raman peaks at 1088, 1304, 1436, 1655, 2854, and 2893 cm−1 were distinguished; (b) biodiesel conversion rate (in %) analysis are measured, (c) biodiesel heat combustion analysis, and (d) water content (in %) in biodiesel were respectively determined.
Figure 4. For SrO/TiO2_P (0.5) after transesterification process with different reaction time (t, t = 0 (pure), 1, 2, 3, or 4 min), followed by different chemical analyses, (a) the characteristic Raman peaks at 1088, 1304, 1436, 1655, 2854, and 2893 cm−1 were distinguished; (b) biodiesel conversion rate (in %) analysis are measured, (c) biodiesel heat combustion analysis, and (d) water content (in %) in biodiesel were respectively determined.
Catalysts 11 00030 g004
Figure 5. Summary of the transesterification process, reactions mechanism, and the management of reactants and products: (a) SrO particles form agglomerates or clusters upon TiO2_P (0.5), which are resistant to subsequent microwave heating and transesterification process; (b) at the interface between SrO agglomerates and olive oil, biodiesel conversion is performed by an effective microwave heating; (c) product analysis and catalyst condition after the reaction were verified; (d) by acetone or ethanol cleaning under ultrasonic vibration, SrO/TiO2_P (x) could be reused.
Figure 5. Summary of the transesterification process, reactions mechanism, and the management of reactants and products: (a) SrO particles form agglomerates or clusters upon TiO2_P (0.5), which are resistant to subsequent microwave heating and transesterification process; (b) at the interface between SrO agglomerates and olive oil, biodiesel conversion is performed by an effective microwave heating; (c) product analysis and catalyst condition after the reaction were verified; (d) by acetone or ethanol cleaning under ultrasonic vibration, SrO/TiO2_P (x) could be reused.
Catalysts 11 00030 g005
Figure 6. (a) The fabrication process and physical strength testing of SrO/TiO2_P (x): (1) Pressing of TiO2 powder into a plate was (TiO2_p) (2) then dipping into SrO precursor solution with different concentrations; (3) drying of SrO/TiO2_p (x) at 80 °C for 20 min, then 1000 °C for 3 h under vacuum; (4) resulting samples were denoted as SrO_TiO2_P (x), (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 0.7 M); (5) adhesion strength between SrO2 and TiO2_P, tested through the modified ASTM D3359 tape test; (6) a roughness test was measured by using α step for SrO2 upon TiO2_P; (b) the catalytic property of SrO/TiO2_P (0.5); (7) ratio of olive oil: methanol was maintained at 1:6; (8) focused microwave-assisted heating system was employed and measured as a function of reaction time; (9) transesterification reaction for biodiesel production; (10) collection of products (esterified products, FAME) and byproducts (glycerol, excess olive oil and methanol) for examination.
Figure 6. (a) The fabrication process and physical strength testing of SrO/TiO2_P (x): (1) Pressing of TiO2 powder into a plate was (TiO2_p) (2) then dipping into SrO precursor solution with different concentrations; (3) drying of SrO/TiO2_p (x) at 80 °C for 20 min, then 1000 °C for 3 h under vacuum; (4) resulting samples were denoted as SrO_TiO2_P (x), (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 0.7 M); (5) adhesion strength between SrO2 and TiO2_P, tested through the modified ASTM D3359 tape test; (6) a roughness test was measured by using α step for SrO2 upon TiO2_P; (b) the catalytic property of SrO/TiO2_P (0.5); (7) ratio of olive oil: methanol was maintained at 1:6; (8) focused microwave-assisted heating system was employed and measured as a function of reaction time; (9) transesterification reaction for biodiesel production; (10) collection of products (esterified products, FAME) and byproducts (glycerol, excess olive oil and methanol) for examination.
Catalysts 11 00030 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.; Wu, W.-H.; Chen, B.-H.; Liao, J.-D. Heterogeneous Catalysts Using Strontium Oxide Agglomerates Depositing upon Titanium Plate for Enhancing Biodiesel Production. Catalysts 2021, 11, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010030

AMA Style

Lee H, Wu W-H, Chen B-H, Liao J-D. Heterogeneous Catalysts Using Strontium Oxide Agglomerates Depositing upon Titanium Plate for Enhancing Biodiesel Production. Catalysts. 2021; 11(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Han, Wen-Hao Wu, Bing-Hung Chen, and Jiunn-Der Liao. 2021. "Heterogeneous Catalysts Using Strontium Oxide Agglomerates Depositing upon Titanium Plate for Enhancing Biodiesel Production" Catalysts 11, no. 1: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010030

APA Style

Lee, H., Wu, W. -H., Chen, B. -H., & Liao, J. -D. (2021). Heterogeneous Catalysts Using Strontium Oxide Agglomerates Depositing upon Titanium Plate for Enhancing Biodiesel Production. Catalysts, 11(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop