Next Article in Journal
Electrochemical Synthesis of Versatile Pyrimidine and Oxadiazoles Tethered Triazoles as Inhibitors of VEGFR-2 in Human Breast Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Review on Recent Advances in the Removal of Organic Drugs by Advanced Oxidation Processes
Previous Article in Journal
High Photocatalytic Efficiency of Al2O3-TiO2 Coatings on 304 Stainless Steel for Methylene Blue and Wastewater Degradation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Efficacy of A Mo2C/Peroxydisulfate System for Tertiary Wastewater Treatment: A Study of Losartan Degradation, E. coli Inactivation, and Synergistic Effects
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Catalytic Wet Oxidation of Excess Activated Sludge from a Coal Chemical Wastewater Treatment Process

Catalysts 2023, 13(10), 1352; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101352
by Zhongquan Wang 1, Shulin Qin 1, Weicheng Zheng 1, Xiaodan Lou 1, Xu Zeng 2,* and Taihang Wu 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Catalysts 2023, 13(10), 1352; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101352
Submission received: 7 September 2023 / Revised: 24 September 2023 / Accepted: 27 September 2023 / Published: 9 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Catalysis in Advanced Oxidation Processes, 2nd Edition)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled “Catalytic wet oxidation of excess activated sludge from a coal chemical wastewater treatment process” was reviewed. In general, the manuscript quite interesting. However, most parts appear to be not prepared well.

 

Introduction: a) Lines 26/36 (1st paragraph): Add references; b) Lines 37/39: Add references.; c) Lines 49/51: I recommend add a recent reference (d)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.029).; d) How is this system different to other reports to merit publication? Please, report.

 

Results: The experimental data should be represented as average ± standard deviation. The authors should also report the number of replicates for all assays.

 

Materials and methods: a) The authors should add relevant information on the reactor and experimental conditions (ratio height/diameter, volume, stirring or static conditions; stirring frequency). I recommend add an illustrative scheme of the experimental apparatus used in this study (reactor). It is very important to the readers.

The manuscript entitled “Catalytic wet oxidation of excess activated sludge from a coal chemical wastewater treatment process” was reviewed. In general, the manuscript quite interesting. However, most parts appear to be not prepared well.

 

Introduction: a) Lines 26/36 (1st paragraph): Add references; b) Lines 37/39: Add references.; c) Lines 49/51: I recommend add a recent reference (d)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.029).; d) How is this system different to other reports to merit publication? Please, report.

 

Results: The experimental data should be represented as average ± standard deviation. The authors should also report the number of replicates for all assays.

 

Materials and methods: a) The authors should add relevant information on the reactor and experimental conditions (ratio height/diameter, volume, stirring or static conditions; stirring frequency). I recommend add an illustrative scheme of the experimental apparatus used in this study (reactor). It is very important to the readers.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments. Please see the attached file. Thanks!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript by Wu and coworkers, titled “Catalytic wet oxidation of excess activated sludge from a coal chemical wastewater treatment process”, reports on the use of a Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3 catalyst for degradation of sludge from a coal chemical wastewater treatment process. Several parameters were investigated aiming at optimizing the degradation process.

The work could be of interest for the readers of catalysts, after the following major revision.

1)      Recyclability studies with the same catalytic systems are highly recommended;

2)       English needs to be polished;

3)      Please, specify acronymes the first time they are mentioned.

English needs to be polished

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments. Please see the attached file. Thanks!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors adequately responded to all referees' concerns. Therefore, I suggest publication in the present form

Back to TopTop