Next Article in Journal
Research on the Compound Optimization Method of the Electrical and Thermal Properties of SiC/EP Composite Insulating Material
Previous Article in Journal
Hierarchically Porous Microspheres by Thiol-ene Photopolymerization of High Internal Phase Emulsions-in-Water Colloidal Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecularly Imprinted Chitosan-Based Thin Films with Selectivity for Nicotine Derivatives for Application as a Bio-Sensor and Filter

by
Obinna Ofoegbu
1,*,
David Chukwuebuka Ike
1,
Gaber El-Saber Batiha
2,
Hassan Fouad
3,
Roongnapa S. Srichana
4 and
Ian Nicholls
5
1
Organic, Polymer, Nano Materials and Molecular Recognition Research Group, Department of Chemistry, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi 970101, Nigeria
2
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22511, Egypt
3
Applied Medical Science Department, Community College, King Saudi University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia
4
Molecular Recognition Materials Research Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
5
Centre for Biomaterials Chemistry, Linnaeus University, 39782 Kalmar, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(19), 3363; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193363
Submission received: 13 August 2021 / Revised: 13 September 2021 / Accepted: 14 September 2021 / Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Sustainable Polymer Technologies)

Abstract

:
This study reports the feasible use of chitosan as a thin film biosensor on the very sensitive quartz crystal micro balance system for detection of blends of multiple templates within a single matrix. The development of chitosan-based thin film materials with selectivity for nicotine derivatives is described. The molecular imprinting of a combination of nicotine derivatives in N-diacryloyl pipiradine-chitosan-methacrylic acid copolymer films on quartz crystal resonators was used to generate thin films with selectivity for nicotine and a range of nicotine analogues, particularly 3-phenylpyridine. The polymers were characterized by spectroscopic and microscopic evaluations; surface area, pore size, pore volume using Breuner-Emmet-Teller method. Temperature characteristics were also studied. The swelling and structure consistency of the Chitosan was achieved by grafting with methylmethacrylic acid and cross-linking with N-diacrylol pipiradine. A blend of 0.002 g (0.04 mmol) of Chitosan, 8.5 μL Methylmethacrylic Acid and 1.0 mg N-diacrylol pipradine (BAP) presented the best blend formulation. Detections were made within a time interval of 99 s, and blend templates were detected at a concentration of 0.5 mM from the Quartz crystal microbalance resonator analysis. The successful crosslinking of the biopolymers ensured successful control of the swelling and agglomeration of the chitosan, giving it the utility potential for use as thin film sensor. This successful crosslinking also created successful dual multiple templating on the chitosan matrix, even for aerosolized templates. The products can be used in environments with temperature ranges between 60 °C and 250 °C.

1. Introduction

Despite the promising and evidenced utilization of Chitosan in paper-sizing [1], the food industry [2], pharmaceuticals, Veterinary medicine [3,4] medicine [5,6], separation processes [7,8,9], and energy systems such as fuel cells [10,11], and at different application sizes such as the Nano and micro scales [12,13,14], as well as in the area of molecular imprinting [15,16,17,18], its extensive use in a diversified industrial economy has been limited due to its hydrophilic nature and narrow application temperature tolerance.
The presence of hydroxyl functionality catalyzes its inherent disposition to swell in the presence of water and makes it challenging for thin film studies to be carried out using it as a matrix. In a bid to overcome these challenges, scientists have adopted approaches like copolymerization and grafting in order to stiffen and restrict the swelling potential, amongst other target goals [19,20,21,22,23,24].
Molecularly imprinted fabrications have progressed over the years from uni-template systems with specific single analyte detections [25,26,27] to multi-template systems with selective family analogue detections [28,29,30] and recently uni-template systems with the ability to select multi-analyte protocols [31,32,33]. These systems are functional, however, limitations occur as a result of complexity in the contact environment, the stereo-specificity of available analytes and differences in the pH of the environment. Consequently, researchers have recently delved into the modification of matrices with multi-template binding inclusions [34,35,36]. It is definitely advantageous to employ multi-templated MIPs within an environment that has constituent group analogues or family species so as to simultaneously adsorb the pollutants. This reduces the burden of fabricating numerous matrices for individual specific adsorptions with respect to cost, materials consumption and negative environmental impact.
The research being reported here pertains to the fabrication of a proof-of-concept study of a completely biomaterial-based molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) product with a multi-template system capable of entrapping more than one pollutant in a given single contact exposure.
For the purpose of achieving the set objective of the present study, copolymerization with methyl acrylic acid as a cofunctional monomer is adopted. The template materials are Nicotine and its structural analogue 3-Phenylpyridine. The use of N-diacryloyl pipiradine/BisAcrylo Pipiradine BAP ensures specific cavity formation for binding of template molecule(s) within the MIP structure [37]. Characterization of samples was done using Quartz Crystal Micro scale (QCM) analysis, Infra-Red (IR) and Ultra Violet- Visible (UV-VIS) spectroscopy, Scanning Electron (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), as well as surface area and pore volume determination using the Breuner-Emmet-Teller (BET) method.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Quartz Crystal Microbalance Analysis Results

The best mass density of Chitosan for the MIP architecture was obtained by the experimental variation of quantities of Chitosan and identification of the highest residual vibrational frequency on a QCM resonator while all other inputs were kept constant ESD 1. The obtained value was employed in the formulation as presented in Table 1.
After formulation, the samples were coated on activated resonators and polymerized at 60 °C for 2 h, and their respective frequencies determined using the QCM machine. From Figure 1, a non-zero residual frequency was obtained considering that, both at equilibrium and with subsequent injections of rebinding solutions at different concentrations, the difference in frequency (residual frequency) did not give a zero value. This is in agreement with results obtained by other researchers [38]. The implication is that there was a permanent material deposition on the resonators, which confirms a successful polymerization with template cavities. From the results, a formulation containing 0.04 mmol of Chitosan (chip no 3) (Table 1) was selected because it presented a middle cause in selecting the most suitable amount of Chitosan required for mass deposition. This is also supported by the result from Figure 1 where the relative frequency values of the MIPs were higher than that of the NIP, indicative of the difference in mass-density, a consequence of the template(s) imprinting.
The residual frequencies for all samples were significantly higher than that of the NIP. Interestingly, the frequency value for the blend template occurred in between the respective frequencies of individual templates, with that of Nicotine being lower than the blend and that of 3-Phenylpiridine positioned above that of the blend. At lower concentrations, specifically 0.5 mM, the frequencies of both 3-Phenylpiridine and that of the blend template were approximately the same. This implies that at lower concentrations of detections it may be somewhat difficult to specifically identify 3-Phenylpiridine in a cocktail of close analogues, while that of Nicotine distinctly stands out. Longer rebinding time is also required for detection of 3-Phenylpiridine, as shown from the plot (Figure 2). All other detections were made within the time interval of 99 s except for the highest concentration of 3-Phenylpiridine-template sample, which was done at a much higher detection period. Overall, detections of chitosan-based Nicotine and its analogue template, as well as blends of them, can be made using the QCM resonator at micro trace levels despite the hydrophilic character of Chitosan, which prompts its swelling and astronomical increase in mass density during sensing.
The preliminary trial results demonstrated the functionality of the Chitosan-based MIP thin film on the surface of the chip sensor. The best blend formulation favoured the formulation having 0.002 g of Chitosan, and this was used in the synthesis of a dual-template MIP thin film.
The Sensogram study was done using a Phosphate buffer solution (PBS) at a pH of 7.4 and rebinding template solutions with concentrations of 5 mM, 2 mM, 1 mM, 0.5 mM, 0.2 mM and 0.1 mM contained in the PBS carrier solution. An Attana 100 QCM machine was used for the flow injection analysis (FIA) at a temperature of 22 °C, flow rate of 25, time scale of 50 min, frequency scale of 100 Hz. A frequency offset of 0.0 and injection volume of 100 μL and 2 cycle injections were operated at for the rebinding study. Figure 3 shows the Sensogram chart of the rebinding study with three repeat cycles.
The Sensogram (Figure 2) clearly shows the ability of the fabricated MIP thin film to reproducibly bind the blend template materials as contained in the carrier medium without significant alterations in repeat cycles. Another insight was evident when the concentration of the carrier medium was altered, indicative of an electrostatic influence of a carrier medium on the effective binding of templates by MIP samples (ref). The polymer film prepared without the template molecules or the non-imprinted polymer (NIP) failed to rebind any significant template material because the rebinding by the MIP was actually due to imprinting of the templates, as shown in the Sensogram below (Figure 3).
A selectivity and sensitivity study of the MIP was also carried out using Nicotine, Phenylpyridine, Caffeine and Phenylalanine amide as rebinding molecules alongside the blend template system. The choice of the compounds was predominantly due to their closely related structural and physiochemical properties, as is the case with Caffeine. Nicotine and Phenylpyridine were used so as to confirm the relative sensitivity of the MIP material in the presence of only one of the blend components, and possible changes in preference in the presence of the two but in different concentrations. Their individual molar masses are also closely valued, which helps rule out the possible effects of size or steric preference. Figure 4 shows that the selectivity of the structured MIP for Nicotine was least, below 3-Phenylpiridine, which comes below the blend template sample. This shows the selectivity and sensitivity of the MIP even in the presence of component molecules where they exist individually and not combined. This sensitivity is further confirmed by the non-binding of the Caffeine molecule and the reverse slight adsorption of the Phenylalanine amide molecule.
A plot of the residual frequency against concentration of the templates (5–0.1 mM) clearly shows the selectivity and sensitivity potential of the MIP in the presence of the templates (Figure 5).
Further characterization was done to support the above findings; these include temperature dependent changes as well as the earlier mentioned analysis.
From the electronic supporting document (ESD) 2: FTIR spectra of MIP samples. All components of the polymer blend were made up of similar functional groups, particularly OH, CH2, CH3, NH2; similar peaks were observed in the spectra of both the NIP and very significantly amongst the MIPs. Differences were observed in the individual intensities of transmittance, as shown in Figure 6.
The observed overlaps, disappearances and visibilities occur as a result of the cross-linking and graft polymerization processes. The reported [17] characteristic peak of Chitosan, which is within an average of 1555.2 cm−1, is observed in all the samples but with differing percentages of transmittance. These are peaks within the 1550 s cm−1. The value for sample 3 is the least, with an average of 83.4, while sample 2 has an average of 85.3, sample 4 91.6, and samples 5 and 1 94.2 and 95.3, respectively (Figure 7).
This is commensurate with the quantities of Chitosan added in the individual sample blends, except for the observed shift in correlation between sample 3 and adjacent sample 4, which may be interpreted as due to the relative degree of grafting that occurred with sample 3, resulting in a reduced level in the intensity of the characteristic peak of Chitosan present. This is indicative of a blend with optimal grafting and crosslinking in the synthesis of the MIP. A further confirmation is seen in the relative degree of intensities with the characteristic peak of C–N functionality.
The presence of characteristic strong and broad band peak ranges from 3700–3200 cm−1, which are the extension vibration of the N–H functionality and the O–H vibrational stretching of ungrafted or uncross-linked Chitosan molecule, presents support for the cross-linked grafting of Chitosan and Methacrylic acid in the presence of 1,4-Bis (Acryloyl) piperazine (BAP). It is further observed that a shift towards the asymmetric and symmetric –CH2 functionality is evidenced in Figure 8, with increased prominence of peaks within the range of 2920s and 2869s [16,17].
From the FTIR spectra of the template eluted MIP samples (Figure 9), the prominent peaks are as shown in ESD III and the representative functional groups are likewise identified as previously shown in Figure 8.
The individual plot of % transmittance against the wave number for Chitosan, MAA and BAP depicts their characteristic assignments as displayed on the graph (Figure 10). Overlap in transmittances occurs at wavenumbers 954.19, 1695.94, 1293.39, 1435.03, 2174.9 and 3073.13 cm−1. Chitosan’s characteristic peak at 3328.51 and MAA’s peaks at 2963.23, 2817.87, 2629.64 and 946.74 cm−1 on cross-linking with BAP (Figure 11) give a cross-linked matrix with distinct peaks at 1110.75 (confirmatory secondary alcohol C–O stretch), 1298.98 (primary or secondary OH in-plane bending), 1470.43 (carboxylate functionality from carboxylic acid of MAA after cross-linking with Chitosan in the presence of BAP), 1649.35 (primary amine N-H bend), 2126.45 and 3324.79 cm−1 (normal polymeric OH stretch and N-H stretch of primary amine).
There are two key factors when identifying the vibrational mode of samples using a QCM, namely, whether the superimposable characteristics of residual vibrations form a mirror image, and whether the dissipation value is greater than 2 × 10−6. Where the dissipation value is greater than stated and there is no mirror image of the residual vibrational mode, then the material is said to be viscoelastic; when the reverse is the case, it is said to be elastic [21]. Figure 13 shows the residual vibrational frequencies of the samples of MIPs that were synthesized; it shows a non-mirror image of the residual vibrational frequencies, and dissipation values were above those stated. This affirms that the MIPs exhibit viscoelastic characteristics during the activity period. This is also attributable to the hydrophilic property of Chitosan, which causes a degree of swelling and elasticity.
It is observed that due to blending and interaction with the polymer matrices, the template molecule with initial dual peak absorbance converged to only one significant peak with reduced absorbance maxima. This phenomenon is also observed with the NIP, but with greatly reduced significance considering the fact that there is still dual peak spectra absorbance as a low-positioned elbow in the wavelength range of 250 and 300 nm. The MIP samples show only one prominent peak with a wavelength between 200 and 250 nm. The single prominent peak is a result of the appearance of the templates at an overlapping wavelength and absorbance maximum due to their very closely related electronic π − π * and n − π * configurations.

2.2. Temperature Induced Changes of Polymer Films

When subjected to heating in a Bibby Stuart Scientific melting point SMP1 apparatus with a power capacity of 50 W, voltage of 230 V and heating rate of 1 °C/4.9 s, physio-chemical changes were observed with respect to material stability (ESD Table 2). The NIP samples shrank within an average temperature range of 82–98 °C. This is due to evaporative instances of water molecules with weak hydrogen bonds contained in the sample. Samples with only Nicotine showed no visible signs of shrinking, but decomposed at temperature ranges between 100 °C and 300 °C for samples with highest content of Chitosan. This implies that the higher the amount of Chitosan with effective copolymerization, the more stable the product and consequently, the higher the decomposition temperature. The samples with only 3-Phenylpiridine had a higher decomposition temperature but a close shorter-range difference between component blend samples, starting from 171 °C to 240 °C for samples with the highest amount of Chitosan. These samples did not shrink but rather became translucent before decomposition. This is an indication of a level of sustained stability before decomposition for samples having the phenyl group substituent, probably due to the aromaticity of the group. The polymer samples with the blend of templates exhibited both the shrinking and the translucency but in reversed order, becoming translucent before shrinking and then decomposing. This phenomenon was observed from a temperature of 140 °C up to 220 °C. This indicates the effect and evidence of blending between the two templates. This characteristic reflects the observed trend in ESD IV, where the MIP with the blend template had resonant frequency in-between the two individual templates, showing a sort of compensational compromise obtained from blending the templates. This response can be used to identify blends of templates in environments with multi-template molecules.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Field emission scanning electron microscopy using a JEOL Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) was used to characterize the surface morphology of representative samples of both the MIPs and the NIP; the results are presented as Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14.
The SEM micrographs present the representative samples as being spherical in their morphology. The MIPs (Figure 12 and Figure 13) are observed to have cavities with a linked hierarchical type of network, while the NIP (Figure 14) does not possess such attributes. This is due to the non-templating of the polymer, which ensured that cavities as obtainable with the MIPs were not created. The particles are mesoporous and clustered, presenting a mesh-like framework which is a disadvantage for typical SPE application but acceptable for sequestration of very closely clustered materials as are obtained with fluid cocktails such as smoke streams. The sizes are 200 nm for the MIPs and 100 nm for the NIP. This difference in size easily implicates the templating and non-templating activities carried out during polymerization. The respective surface area (26.455, 76.635 and 5.339), pore volume (0.067, 0.219 and 0.010) and pore diameter (3.411, 3.411 and 4.302) values for 3-Phenylpiridine, Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine and the non-templated, respectively (Table 2), align with the observed presentation except for the pore diameter of the NIP which is more than that of the MIPs. The MIPs are polydisperse as indicated by their different aggregate sizes [17,18,19,20,21], and this is in tandem with the micrographs of the TEM.

2.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analysis

The analysis was carried out using a JEOL, JEM-2010 Electron Microscope.

2.5. Surface Area, Pore Size, Diameter and Volume Analysis, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET)

BET results were obtained from Quanta chrome Nova Win, NOVA Quanta chrome Instruments with software version 11.03. The conditions prevailing as at the period of analysis were:
  • Adsorbate: Nitrogen
  • Adsorbate Temperature: 77.350 K
  • Outgas Time: 2 h
  • Outgas Temp: 100 °C
  • Analysis gas: Nitrogen
  • Bath Temp: 273 K
  • Pressure Tolerance:0.100/0.100 (ads/des)
  • Equilibrium time: 60/60 s (ads/des)
  • Equilibrium timeout: 240/240 s (ads/des)
The samples present a typical composite type IVa and type II isotherm, exhibiting typical features of a type II isotherm including unrestricted monolayer-multilayer adsorption with the characteristic “sharp knee” [21] which represents the completion of monolayer coverage. The curve then extends, in a less distinctive curve relative to the “sharp knee”. This is proof of a substantial degree of overlap between the monolayer coverage and the beginning of multilayer adsorption. This phenomenon combines with type IV isotherm-characteristic conical and cylindrical mesopores that are closed at the tapered end, as seen in the results of the TEM analysis (Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17). The tapered ends of the pores are presented as converging cavities. Since the pores’ widths are on average wider than 4 nm (Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure 20, Figure 21 and Figure 22), the adsorption occurred via capillary condensation, hysteresis was undergone as part of the adsorption mechanism [17], and the samples exhibited H3 type hysteresis with characteristic adsorption branching phenomenon of the Type II isotherm (“sharp knee”); this corroborates the earlier deduction of the samples being type IV isotherms. Another characteristic is the branching at the lower limit of desorption being normally cited at the cavitation induced pressure point (p/p0). From the hysteresis loop which occurred at relatively high pressure, the samples are distinctively mesoporous, in agreement with reports by other researchers [15]. Values of the surface areas, pore volumes and pore diameters were all below 100 m2 g−1 for surface, 2 ccg−1 for pore volume and 4 nm for pore diameter (Table 2). This points to the MIPs and NIPs being nanoparticle-sized. This aligns with the submission from [15,21]. The Temographs show non-uniformity in the dimensions of the cavities for both the MIPs and NIP. This can be linked to influence from weak template-monomer interactions and with the peak centers being above 4 nm; it is strongly agreeable that the pore dimensions were generated during polymerization via template-monomer interactions rather than porogen/solvent influences [17,21].

3. Experimental

3.1. Reagents and Materials

Low molecular weight Chitosan was procured from Sigma Aldrich Ltd. Darmstadt Germany.; Nicotine from Fisher scientific GTF AB Goteborg, Sweden. Triethylamine (TEA) was obtained in its analar grade from MERCK Ltd. Darmstadt Germany. Methacrylic acid (MAA), 1,4-Bis (Acryloyl) piperazine (BAP), Ammonium peroxydisulfate, Toluene, Acetone, Tetrahydrofuran (THF), Hydrogen Peroxide, Sulphuric Acid and were all of Analar grade and procured from SIGMA-ALDRICH Ltd. Darmstadt Germany.

3.2. Apparatus and Measurements

An Attana 100 QCM machine was used to carry out the injections and recording of the resonant frequency changes that occurred as a result of template introductions and elution. A CARY 630 FTIR spectrometer by Agilent Technologies was used to confirm the presence of functional groups within the polymer compounds and effective polymerization/cross linking/templating. A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (Leo 1550 Gemini instrument furnished with a field emission electron gun in the high vacuum mode), was employed in the characterization of the surface morphology. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis was carried out using a JEOL, JEM-2010 operating at 160 kV. The samples were suspended in Phosphate Buffer Solution (pH 4) deposited drop-wise and evaporated on 200 mesh copper grids. The Electron Microscope aided the characterization of the cavities formed after polymerization. TEM enhanced the aggregate units as distinctly resolved and analyzed individual units. The surface area, pore size and pore volume analysis using the BET Method was done using Quanta chrome Instrument, with Nova Win, NOVA Quanta chrome Instruments, version 11.03. data analysis software.

3.3. Cleaning of Chip Surface

The preparative step of cleaning the quartz crystal chip surface was done by combining an adapted method [38], where SiO2-coated crystals were washed in piranha solution (70% H2SO4 and 30% H2O2) by gentle swirling of the chips in the solution for 2 min. A liberal amount of double distilled/ultrapure water was then used in rinsing the chips before neutralization in a 0.1 M NaOH solution, aided by sonication for 20 min followed by drying in a stream of Nitrogen gas. The pre-cleaned chips were sonicated in Acetone then Tetrahydrofuran and finally Toluene for 20 min each, respectively. They were finally dried using Nitrogen gas and kept in Falcone tubes for the next stage of silanization.

3.4. Functionalization of Chip’s Surface (Silanization)

Silanization was carried out on the cleaned surfaces of the chips by immersing the chips in a solution containing 7.2 μL of 3-(Trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate (silane), 0.72 μL of Triethylamine (TEA) and 360 μL of Toluene for not less than 24 h; they were then wrapped with Aluminum foil and kept in a cupboard. At the end of the contact period, the chips were sequentially rock-washed for 30 min each in Toluene, THF and Acetone, then allowed to dry in a stream of Nitrogen gas.

3.5. MIP and NIP Preparation

Imprinted and non-imprinted polymer samples were prepared using a blend ratio of 1.6:12:55:1:1.26 for solvent, functional monomer cross linker, template, and initiator, respectively. The blend was vortexed for 30 s before a 0.5 μL volume was introduced onto the surface of the functionalized crystal chip. The chips containing the pre-polymerized matrix were exposed to thermal activation (60 °C) by surface-induced free radical polymerization process. The MIP was prepared with the template materials Nicotine (MIP Product A), 3-Phenylpiridine (MIP Product B) and a 50:50 blend of both templates (MIP Product C); while the NIP was prepared without templates. Table 1 shows the blend formulations for the samples prepared.
Polymers 13 03363 i001
Polymers 13 03363 i002
MIP Product A, B and C.
Polymers 13 03363 i003
MIP Product A.
Polymers 13 03363 i004
MIP Product B.
Polymers 13 03363 i005
MIP Product C.

3.6. Elution of Template Materials

At the end of the polymerization, the polymer films on the surface of the chips were washed first with 1 mL Acetone, then 1 mL of Acetonitrile (polymerization solvent for sample 2), Methanol (for sample 4) and finally with 0.01 M NaOH for both the MIPs and the NIP samples. This was done in two washing cycles, for 10 min each using the rock-washing equipment. This treatment eluted the template materials from the polymer films. The MIPs and NIP were then kept for testing and analysis using the Attana QCM machine.

3.7. Instrumentation

FTIR spectroscopy allows the possibility of quantitatively mining evidence with respect to the arrangement of the synthesized NIP or MIP. Considering the cocktail of chemical fluxes within the prepared matrix as a result of interactions between the additives, it becomes very necessary to use this analytical tool to characterize samples based on the functional groups present or absent and the interplays that occur during the polymerization, template elution and/or rebinding. The spectrum from an IR analysis facilitates the examination of the type of interaction(s) that took place as a result of the polymerization reaction during MIP synthesis. It particularly gives clear insight into the bond types that exist, such as non-covalent hydrogen bonding or other weak bonding phenomena. From an interpretation of the bonding type, plausible mechanisms of the interaction between template and matrix are also understood and this also directs the scope of specific interactions and preferences for the monomer-cross linker interaction and monomer-template relationship, all of which help in predicting the rebinding ability of the complex matrix. [39]. Functional groups’ presence or absence have been identified [40] and used by researchers to draw conclusions on the effective elution of templates. [41]
Shunli et al., 2013 observed strong bands at 3441.76 cm−1 matching the OH stretching vibration, bands at 3441.76 cm−1, 1732.5 cm−1 and 1259.65 cm−1 of carboxyl functionality, as well as absorbance at 1638.63 cm−1 consigned to stretching of C–C bond, pinpointing differences between the NIP and MIP samples. This can be authenticated even in the presence or absence of the template material [42]. FTIR has been used to identify harmful components in pesticides [43] and other organic substances. UV-VIS spectroscopy provides information on the presence and degree of template material with respect to the MIP matrix. This is done by noting the evidenced absorbance from the NIP and MIP, or in some comparative studies, differences in absorbance values. This analysis also gives insight into the binding capacities of matrix and template. Reports have presented cases where it was used to characterize substances like benzotriazole [44], tetracycline [45], b-estradiol, estradiol benzoate, ethynyl estradiol etc. [46], as well as the extent to which binding was feasible.
The surface morphology of synthesized polymer matrix influences the chemical, binding and thermal capacities of analyte-matrix system, which has a direct relationship with binding specificity within the polymer matrix [47,48]. This then necessitates the study and characterization of synthesized NIPs and MIPs using SEM. Light microscopy verifies the fundamental physical reliability of the matrix’s globules while SEM confirms the image macrospores [49].
Apart from the fact that QCM operates at sensitivities up to the nanogram level, it also has the ability to detect elusive variations within an environment which may occur as a result of mass-volume-viscosity in a medium. It detects variations within the rigid material as these affect the viscoelastic properties. Moreover, the surface free energy parameter is characteristically accounted for when using this technology. Consequently, QCM presents a very cost effective, fast and efficient tool for spot confirmation of the feasibility of the synthesis of molecularly imprinted materials. This technique has contributed to the clarification of several inherent properties of biological systems. This is achieved by studying the direct correlation between change in frequency (Δf) and mass per volume quantity (Δm) [50] by the application of its sensitivity at the sub mono layer level. Despite its drawbacks [51] such as violation of the Sauerbrey assumption of adsorption occurring at the rigidity state of samples, QCM has found application in many areas of biomaterials science [52,53,54].

4. Conclusions

From the results obtained, a matrix based on Chitosan copolymerized with MAA was synthesised and this was simultaneously imprinted with two template materials, Nicotine and an analogue. QCM analysis established the viscoelastic properties of the polymer thin film, as well as the feasibility of having a blend of more than one template within a singular matrix. These MIPs can be used in environments at temperatures above 60 °C but below 250 °C, as shown by the of temperature effect results obtained using the melting point apparatus. Obtained experimental data also showed that chitosan solutions of very low concentrations (0.04 mMole) are suitable for thin film operations and exhibit potential for multi-templating with target materials. Detection of the template materials is feasible even at micro-trace level of 0.1 mMoles and a chitosan weight of 0.002 g.
The selectivity and sensitivity of the prepared MIPs were authenticated by their response to the presence of caffeine and phenylalanine amide within the same environment, where the templated MIPs selectively removed the vinyl alanine amide, in preference to the closely related caffeine. The SEM result authenticated the spherical nature of the prepared MIPs, while the TEM results confirmed the cavity integrity of as little as 27.19, 51.21 and 150.93 nm, which created the ability of the prepared MIPs to sequester toxicant even at trace micro levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, bench work, primary data analysis and draft manuscript writing, O.O.; Secondary data collation, manuscript review and editing, D.C.I.; Final manuscript review and editing, G.E.-S.B., H.F.; Primary data analysis review, manuscript review and editing, I.N.; Secondary data analysis review and manuscript review, R.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

1. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, Grant 2014-4573); 2. Researchers supporting project number (RSP-2021/117), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research Manuscript processing is funded by Researchers supporting project number (RSP-2021/117), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors would like to appreciate the administration and staff of Prince of Songkhla University HatYai, Songkhla Thailand particularly the Molecular Recognition Materials Research Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences for their assistance and contributions. financial support of the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, Grant 2014-4573), that covered the research activity at the Bioorganic & Biophysical Chemistry Laboratory, Linnaeus University Centre for Biomaterials Chemistry, School of Chemistry & Biomedicine, Linnaeus University, Kalmer Sweden; for the synthesis of the polymers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Song, Z.; Li, G.; Guan, F.; Liu, W. Application of chitin/chitosan and their derivatives in the papermaking industry. Polymers 2018, 10, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Harkin, C.; Mehlmer, N.; Woortman, D.V.; Brück, T.B.; Brück, W.M. Nutritional and additive uses of chitin and chitosan in the food industry. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 36, pp. 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  3. Valachová, K.; Šoltés, L. Versatile use of chitosan and hyaluronan in medicine. Molecules 2021, 26, 1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jaber, N.; Al-Remawi, M.; Al-Akayleh, F.; Al-Muhtaseb, N.; Al-Adham, I.S.; Collier, P.J. A review of the antiviral activity of Chitosan, including patented applications and its potential use against COVID-19. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Quispe, C.; Butnariu, M.; Rotariu, L.S.; Sytar, O.; Sestito, S.; Rapposelli, S.; Akram, M.; Iqbal, M.; Krishna, A.; et al. Chitosan nanoparticles as a promising tool in nanomedicine with particular emphasis on oncological treatment. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Naskar, S.; Sharma, S.; Kuotsu, K. Chitosan-based nanoparticles: An overview of biomedical applications and its preparation. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 49, 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morin-Crini, N.; Lichtfouse, E.; Torri, G.; Crini, G. Applications of chitosan in food, pharmaceuticals, medicine, cosmetics, agriculture, textiles, pulp and paper, biotechnology, and environmental chemistry. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 1667–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Otvagina, K.V.; Penkova, A.V.; Dmitrenko, M.E.; Kuzminova, A.I.; Sazanova, T.S.; Vorotyntsev, A.V.; Vorotyntsev, I.V. Novel composite membranes based on chitosan copolymers with polyacrylonitrile and polystyrene: Physicochemical properties and application for pervaporation dehydration of tetrahydrofuran. Membranes 2019, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Jaworska, M.M.; Antos, D.; Górak, A. Review on the application of chitin and chitosan in chromatography. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 152, 10460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Muhmed, S.A.; Nor, N.A.; Jaafar, J.; Ismail, A.F.; Othman, M.H.; Rahman, M.A.; Aziz, F.; Yusof, N. Emerging chitosan and cellulose green materials for ion exchange membrane fuel cell: A review. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2020, 5, 85–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kalaiselvimary, J.; Prabhu, M.R. Fabrications and investigation of physicochemical and electrochemical properties of heteropoly acid-doped sulfonated chitosan-based polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cell applications. Polym. Bull. 2019, 76, 1401–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaker, B.; Hribernik, S.; Mohan, T.; Kargl, R.; Stana Kleinschek, K.; Pavlica, E.; Kreta, A.; Bratina, G.; Lue, S.J.; Bozžicć, M. Novel Chitosan–Mg(OH)2-Based Nanocomposite Membranes for Direct Alkaline Ethanol Fuel Cells. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 19356–19368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Elayaperumal, G.; Sathyapriya, B.; Chinnathambi, M.V. Isotherm and Thermodynamic Studies on the Bio Adsorption of Textile Industrial Effluents onto Chitosan Nanoparticle from Macolor Niger (White Snapper). J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. 2019, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Younus, N.; Zuberi, A.; Mahmoood, T.; Akram, W.; Ahmad, M. Comparative effects of dietary micro-and nano-scale chitosan on the growth performance, non-specific immunity, and resistance of silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix against Staphylococcus aureus infection. Aquac. Int. 2020, 28, 2363–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mabrouk, M.; Hammad, S.F.; Abdella, A.A.; Mansour, F.R. Chitosan-based molecular imprinted polymer for extraction and spectrophotometric determination of ketorolac in human plasma. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 241, 118668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Karrat, A.; Lamaoui, A.; Amine, A.; Palacios-Santander, J.M.; Cubillana-Aguilera, L. Applications of chitosan in molecularly and ion imprinted polymers. Chem. Afr. 2020, 3, 513–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zouaoui, F.; Bourouina-Bacha, S.; Bourouina, M.; Alcacer, A.; Bausells, J.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Zine, N.; Errachid, A. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy microsensor based on molecularly imprinted chitosan film grafted on a 4-aminophenylacetic acid (CMA) modified gold electrode, for the sensitive detection of glyphosate. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zouaoui, F.; Bourouina-Bacha, S.; Bourouina, M.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Zine, N.; Errachid, A. Electrochemical sensors based on molecularly imprinted chitosan: A review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 130, 115982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bitton-Dotan, R.; Bohrisch, J.; Schmidt, C.; Tsuriel, M.; Prasad Tulichala, R.N.; Breuer, E.; Reich, R.; Hoffman, A.; Storsberg, J. The Effect of Chemical Modifications of Chitosan on Intestinal Permeability and Oral Bioavailability of Carbamoylphosphonate JS403. J. Bioequiv. Bioavailab. 2020, 12, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Almualla, M.A.; Mosa, M.N.; Sattar, M. Chemical Modification and Characterization of Chitosan for Pharmaceutical Applications. Egypt. J. Chem. 2021, 64, 3635–3649. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheba, B. Chitosan: Properties, Modifications and Food Nanobiotechnology . Procedia Manuf. 2020, 46, 652–658. [Google Scholar]
  22. Brasselet, C.; Pierre, G.; Dubessay, P.; Dols-Lafargue, M.; Coulon, J.; Maupeu, J.; Vallet-Courbin, A.; De Baynast, H.; Doco, T.; Michaud, P.; et al. Modification of chitosan for the generation of functional derivatives. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Latifi, M.; Ahmad, A.; Kaddami, H.; Hasyareeda Hassan, N.; Dieden, R.; Habibi, Y. Chemical modification and processing of chitin for sustainable production of biobased electrolytes. Polymers 2020, 12, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kaczmarek, M.B.; Struszczyk-Swita, K.; Li, X.; Szczęsna-Antczak, M.; Daroch, M. Enzymatic modifications of chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lu, W.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lv, M.; Cui, R.; Chen, L. Dual-template molecularly imprinted polymers for dispersive solid-phase extraction of fluoroquinolones in water samples coupled with high performance liquid chromatography. Analyst 2019, 144, 1292–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Madikizela, L.M.; Ncube, S.; Chimuka, L. Green chemistry features in molecularly imprinted polymers preparation process. In Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 86, pp. 337–364. [Google Scholar]
  27. El-Akaad, S.; Mohamed, M.A.; Abdelwahab, N.S.; Abdelaleem, E.A.; De Saeger, S.; Beloglazova, N. Capacitive sensor based on molecularly imprinted polymers for detection of the insecticide imidacloprid in water. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rico-Yuste, A.; Carrasco, S. Molecularly imprinted polymer-based hybrid materials for the development of optical sensors. Polymers 2019, 11, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Zarejousheghani, M.; Rahimi, P.; Borsdorf, H.; Zimmermann, S.; Joseph, Y. Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based Sensors for Priority Pollutants. Sensors 2021, 21, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Díaz-Álvarez, M.; Martín-Esteban, A. Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Quantum Dot Materials in Optical Sensors: An Overview of Their Synthesis and Applications. Biosensors 2021, 11, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Díaz-Álvarez, M.; Martín-Esteban, A. Sample Preparation via Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs) in LC-MS Bioanalysis. Sample Prep. LC-MS Bioanal. 2019, 25, 139–151. [Google Scholar]
  32. Del Sole, R.; Mele, G.; Bloise, E.; Mergola, L. Green Aspects in Molecularly Imprinted Polymers by Biomass Waste Utilization. Polymers 2021, 13, 2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gholami, H.; Ghaedi, M.; Arabi, M.; Ostovan, A.; Bagheri, A.R.; Mohamedian, H. Application of molecularly imprinted biomembrane for advancement of matrix solid-phase dispersion for clean enrichment of parabens from powder sunscreen samples: Optimization of chromatographic conditions and green approach. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 3839–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Elfadil, D.; Lamaoui, A.; Della Pelle, F.; Amine, A.; Compagnone, D. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Combined with Electrochemical Sensors for Food Contaminants Analysis. Molecules 2021, 26, 4607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cui, F.; Zhou, Z.; Zhou, H.S. Molecularly imprinted polymers and surface imprinted polymers based electrochemical biosensor for infectious diseases. Sensors 2020, 20, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Jamieson, O.; Mecozzi, F.; Crapnell, R.D.; Battell, W.; Hudson, A.; Novakovic, K.; Sachdeva, A.; Canfarotta, F.; Herdes, C.; Banks, C.E.; et al. Approaches to the Rational Design of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Developed for the Selective Extraction or Detection of Antibiotics in Environmental and Food Samples. Phys. Status Solidi A 2021, 218, 2100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Z.; Xu, Z.; Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Duan, Y.; Ma, L.; Lin, T.; Liu, H. A Review on Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Preparation by Computational Simulation-Aided Methods. Polymers 2021, 13, 2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cakir, O. A molecularly imprinted nanofilm-based quartz crystal microbalance sensor for the real-time detection of pirimicarb. J. Mol. Recognit. 2019, 32, 2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Song, X.; Turiel, E.; He, L.; Martín-Esteban, A. Synthesis of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for the Selective Extraction of Polymyxins from Environmental Water Samples. Polymers 2020, 12, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Bakhtiar, S.; Bhawani, S.A.; Shafqat, S.R. Synthesis and characterization of molecular imprinting polymer for the removal of 2-phenylphenol from spiked blood serum and river water. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2019, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Roland, R.M.; Bhawani, S.A.; Wahi, R.; Ibrahim, M.N. Synthesis, characterization, and application of molecular imprinting polymer for extraction of melamine from spiked milk, water, and blood serum. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2020, 43, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Obinna, O.; Tanmanee, N.; Titus, Y.; Anthony, O.; Augustine, E.; Nicholls, I.; Srichana, R. Chitosan molecularly imprinted polymers cross linked with (E)-3, 7-Dimethyl-2,6-octadienoic acid, with Binding Sites for Phenylalanine Amide. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Fabunmi, O. A More Efficient Method for Extracting and Analyzing Pesticides in Baby Foods. Master’s Thesis, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tavman, A.; Hacioglu, M.; Gürbüz, D.; Cinarli, A.; Oksüzömer, M.F.; Tan, A.B. Spectral characterization and antimicrobial activity of some transition metal complexes of 2-(5-nitro-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-4-bromophenol. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2019, 33, 451–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dedic, M.; Gutic, S.; Gicevic, A.; Becic, E.; Imamovic, B.; Markovic, D.; Ziga-Smajic, N. Application of membrane filters in determination of the adsorption of tetracycline hydrochloride on graphene oxide. Pharmacia 2020, 67, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nie, L.; Zou, P.; Dong, J.; Sun, M.; Ding, P.; Han, Y.; Ji, C.; Zhou, Q.; Yuan, H.; Suo, J. Injectable vaginal hydrogels as a multi-drug carrier for contraception. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Khan, I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Namsheer, K.; Rout, C.S. Conducting polymers: A comprehensive review on recent advances in synthesis, properties and applications. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 5659–5697. [Google Scholar]
  49. Asano, N.; Lu, J.; Asahina, S.; Takami, S. Direct Observation Techniques Using Scanning Electron Microscope for Hydrothermally Synthesized Nanocrystals and Nanoclusters. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pérez, R.L.; Ayala, C.E.; Park, J.Y.; Choi, J.W.; Warner, I.M. Coating-based quartz crystal microbalance detection methods of environmentally relevant volatile organic compounds. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Joseph, A.; Emadi, A. A High Frequency Dual Inverted Mesa QCM Sensor Array with Concentric Electrodes. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 92669–92676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Migoń, D.; Wasilewski, T.; Suchy, D. Application of QCM in peptide and protein-based drug product development. Molecules 2020, 25, 3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mosley, R.J.; Talarico, M.V.; Byrne, M.E. Recent applications of QCM-D for the design, synthesis, and characterization of bioactive materials. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2021, 36, 08839115211014216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Schofield, M.M.; Delgado-Buscalioni, R. Quantitative description of the response of finite size adsorbates on quartz crystal microbalance in liquids using analytical hydrodynamics. Soft Matter 2021, 17, 8160–8174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparative plot of concentration, rebinding time and frequency.
Figure 1. Comparative plot of concentration, rebinding time and frequency.
Polymers 13 03363 g001
Figure 2. Template rebinding potential of synthesized Chitosan-Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Figure 2. Template rebinding potential of synthesized Chitosan-Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g002
Figure 3. Sensogram of non-rebinding activity of NIP sample from the fluid injection analysis.
Figure 3. Sensogram of non-rebinding activity of NIP sample from the fluid injection analysis.
Polymers 13 03363 g003
Figure 4. Selectivity and sensitivity Sensogram of Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine chitosan-based MIP.
Figure 4. Selectivity and sensitivity Sensogram of Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine chitosan-based MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g004
Figure 5. Sensitivity and selectivity of Nicotine, 3-Phenylpiridine, Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine and Caffeine chitosan-based MIP.
Figure 5. Sensitivity and selectivity of Nicotine, 3-Phenylpiridine, Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine and Caffeine chitosan-based MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g005
Figure 6. Plot of transmittances against % intensities for NIP- and MIP-containing templates.
Figure 6. Plot of transmittances against % intensities for NIP- and MIP-containing templates.
Polymers 13 03363 g006
Figure 7. Characteristic peak intensities of Chitosan (1550 cm−1) for the different eluted MIP samples.
Figure 7. Characteristic peak intensities of Chitosan (1550 cm−1) for the different eluted MIP samples.
Polymers 13 03363 g007
Figure 8. Spectra chart of % transmittance for template-eluted MIP samples.
Figure 8. Spectra chart of % transmittance for template-eluted MIP samples.
Polymers 13 03363 g008
Figure 9. Plot of transmittance against wavenumbers of prominent peaks of MIP samples.
Figure 9. Plot of transmittance against wavenumbers of prominent peaks of MIP samples.
Polymers 13 03363 g009
Figure 10. Overlay of spectra of % transmittances against wavenumbers for Chitosan, MAA and BAP.
Figure 10. Overlay of spectra of % transmittances against wavenumbers for Chitosan, MAA and BAP.
Polymers 13 03363 g010
Figure 11. Plot of transmittance against wave number for Chitosan, MAA and BAP.
Figure 11. Plot of transmittance against wave number for Chitosan, MAA and BAP.
Polymers 13 03363 g011
Figure 12. SEM micrograph of the 3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Figure 12. SEM micrograph of the 3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g012
Figure 13. SEM micrograph of Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Figure 13. SEM micrograph of Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g013
Figure 14. SEM micrograph of the NIP sample.
Figure 14. SEM micrograph of the NIP sample.
Polymers 13 03363 g014
Figure 15. TEM micrograph of the 3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Figure 15. TEM micrograph of the 3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g015
Figure 16. TEM micrograph of the Nicotine 3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Figure 16. TEM micrograph of the Nicotine 3-Phenylpiridine MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g016
Figure 17. TEM micrograph of the NIP sample.
Figure 17. TEM micrograph of the NIP sample.
Polymers 13 03363 g017
Figure 18. Isotherm of Chitosan-MAA-BAP-3Phenylpridine.
Figure 18. Isotherm of Chitosan-MAA-BAP-3Phenylpridine.
Polymers 13 03363 g018
Figure 19. BJH plot for Chitosan-MAA-BAP-3Phenylpridine MIP.
Figure 19. BJH plot for Chitosan-MAA-BAP-3Phenylpridine MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g019
Figure 20. Isotherm of Chitosan-MAA-BAP-Nicotine-3Phenylpridine (MIP).
Figure 20. Isotherm of Chitosan-MAA-BAP-Nicotine-3Phenylpridine (MIP).
Polymers 13 03363 g020
Figure 21. BJH plot for Chitosan-MAA-BAP-Nicotine-3Phenylpridine MIP.
Figure 21. BJH plot for Chitosan-MAA-BAP-Nicotine-3Phenylpridine MIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g021
Figure 22. Pore diameter vs. Pore volume for Chitosan-MAA-BAP-3-Phenylpiridine, blend with Nicotine, and NIP.
Figure 22. Pore diameter vs. Pore volume for Chitosan-MAA-BAP-3-Phenylpiridine, blend with Nicotine, and NIP.
Polymers 13 03363 g022
Table 1. Mole = 1 g of Chitosan in 10 mL 2% Acetic acid solution.
Table 1. Mole = 1 g of Chitosan in 10 mL 2% Acetic acid solution.
Input MaterialsQuantities
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5
Chitosan (mmol/L)0.120.080.040.020.16
Methacrylic Acid (μL)8.58.58.58.58.5
BAP (mg)11111
Template (μL)77777
Ammonium persulphate (mg)0.00010.00010.00010.00010.0001
Table 2. Summary of BJH desorption result.
Table 2. Summary of BJH desorption result.
SampleSurface Area (m2 g−1)Pore Volume (ccg−1)Pore Diameter (nm)
3-Phenylpiridine MIP26.4550.0673.411
Nicotine-3-Phenylpiridine (MIP)76.6350.2193.411
NIP5.3390.0104.302
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ofoegbu, O.; Ike, D.C.; Batiha, G.E.-S.; Fouad, H.; Srichana, R.S.; Nicholls, I. Molecularly Imprinted Chitosan-Based Thin Films with Selectivity for Nicotine Derivatives for Application as a Bio-Sensor and Filter. Polymers 2021, 13, 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193363

AMA Style

Ofoegbu O, Ike DC, Batiha GE-S, Fouad H, Srichana RS, Nicholls I. Molecularly Imprinted Chitosan-Based Thin Films with Selectivity for Nicotine Derivatives for Application as a Bio-Sensor and Filter. Polymers. 2021; 13(19):3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ofoegbu, Obinna, David Chukwuebuka Ike, Gaber El-Saber Batiha, Hassan Fouad, Roongnapa S. Srichana, and Ian Nicholls. 2021. "Molecularly Imprinted Chitosan-Based Thin Films with Selectivity for Nicotine Derivatives for Application as a Bio-Sensor and Filter" Polymers 13, no. 19: 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193363

APA Style

Ofoegbu, O., Ike, D. C., Batiha, G. E. -S., Fouad, H., Srichana, R. S., & Nicholls, I. (2021). Molecularly Imprinted Chitosan-Based Thin Films with Selectivity for Nicotine Derivatives for Application as a Bio-Sensor and Filter. Polymers, 13(19), 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193363

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop