Next Article in Journal
Investigation on Some Algal Extracts as Appropriate Stabilizers for Radiation-Processed Polymers
Next Article in Special Issue
Case Study on Prestressed CFRP Plates Applied for Strengthening Hollow-Section Beam Removed from an Old Bridge
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Behavior of Thermally Affected Injection-Molded High-Density Polyethylene Parts Modified by Accelerated Electrons
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anti-Corrosion Reinforcements Using Coating Technologies—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Polyoxymethylene Fiber on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete

1
School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
2
Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China
3
School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(22), 4969; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224969
Submission received: 22 September 2022 / Revised: 13 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Concrete)

Abstract

:
Seawater and sea sand are used in concrete to reduce the consumption of freshwater and river sand. To improve the mechanical properties and cracking resistance of concrete, polymer fiber is commonly used. In this study, polyoxymethylene (POM) fiber was innovatively applied to seawater sea-sand concrete (SWSSC), and the workability, early-age cracking behavior, and mechanical properties of SWSSC reinforced with POM fiber were investigated experimentally. A total of 6 kinds of SWSSC mixtures and 72 specimens were included. The test results indicated that with increases in fiber volume fractions (ρ), the workability of SWSSC decreased correspondingly. Compared with plain SWSSC, for SWSSC with ρ = 1%, the decreases in slump and expansibility were 110.6 and 91.9 mm, respectively. POM fiber had a significant enhancing effect on the early-age cracking resistance of SWSSC. Compared with those of plain SWSSC, the cracking indices ac, bc, and cc of the POM-1 specimen decreased by 77.0%, 89.4%, and 97.6%, respectively. Cube and axial compressive tests, splitting tensile tests, and flexural tests were conducted to clarify the effects of POM fiber on the mechanical properties of SWSSC. Compared with plain SWSSC, SWSSC with POM fiber performed better in terms of mechanical properties. Predictive equations were proposed to quantify the effects of POM fiber on the mechanical properties of SWSSC. The failure performances of the SWSSC specimens were discussed and their complete stress–strain curve was analyzed. A stress–strain model for SWSSC was suggested. According to the model, the complete stress–strain curve of SWSSC with any POM fiber content could be determined.

1. Introduction

Steel and concrete exhibit good coordination in their working performance, because the linear thermal expansion coefficient of steel is similar to that of concrete. Considering their outstanding resistance and convenient construction, reinforced concrete (RC) structures are widely used, such as bridges, dams, or industrial and civil structures [1,2]. River sand and freshwater are raw materials used in ordinary concrete. With the acceleration of urbanization, concrete is being consumed in large quantities, resulting in the large-scale exploitation of river sand and freshwater [3]. On the one hand, the massive exploitation of river sand destroys the aquifers under riverbeds and causes large amounts of surface river water to leak into the ground, causing the river water to dry up. On the other hand, the massive exploitation of river sand makes the river channel unable to discharge normally during the flood season. The riverbank cannot protect the coast, which may cause large fields to be flooded and soaked. Furthermore, large amounts of freshwater are consumed, aggravating water shortages. Therefore, the high consumption of concrete seriously affects the natural environment [4]. To balance the development of engineering construction and the protection of the natural environment, it is important to find alternative replacements for river sand and freshwater. Seawater and sea sand are commonly considered as alternative solutions for the sand and water used in concrete [3,5]. The natural resources of seawater and sea sand are much more abundant than those of freshwater and river sand [6,7]. The usage of seawater and sea sand instead of freshwater and river sand in concrete can mitigate the abovementioned environmental problems. The use of local seawater and sea sand in island reef construction can reduce the transportation costs of raw materials and, thus, the engineering costs [5,8]. However, it is worth noting that the use of untreated seawater and sea sand in concrete brings large amounts of chloride. The chloride in untreated seawater and sea sand penetrates the passive film on the reinforcing steel in concrete, resulting in serious corrosion [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. This, in turn, reduces the resistance of RC structures. It is worth noting that the above corrosion issue could be solved by using non-corrosive reinforcement, such as stainless steel bars [16,17], fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars [18,19], and/or bimetallic steel bars [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Corrosion-resistant steel [29,30,31,32] also makes it possible to use seawater and sea sand in steel–concrete composite structures. Concrete made using untreated seawater and sea sand has gradually become a research hotspot in recent years [33,34,35]. Many researchers have conducted studies on the aforementioned seawater sea-sand concrete (SWSSC) [4,6,36,37]. Experimental results have indicated that the workability and mechanical properties of SWSSC are similar to those of ordinary concrete made using freshwater and river sand. Therefore, it is possible to use SWSSC in RC structures as a replacement for traditional concrete. Based on the current research on SWSSC [3,4,6,34], the noteworthy uncertainty in the chemical composition of seawater and the fineness modulus of sea-sand can be observed, leading to differences in the performance of SWSSC. Related studies are still needed to support the engineering application of SWSSC properly.
Fiber-reinforced composites are advanced materials. The use of fiber can significantly improve the crack resistance of concrete. With the deepening of fiber research and the improvement of fiber production processes, fiber is increasingly used in concrete to improve its mechanical properties [38,39]. Tensile properties are important for concrete, which can be effectively enhanced by polymer fibers [40,41,42]. Saradar et al. [43] studied the crack resistance effects of steel fiber, glass fiber, basalt fiber, polypropylene fiber, and polyolefin fiber on concrete, and found that the addition of fiber increases the compressive strength by 16% and 20% at the age of 3 and 7 days, respectively. Alwesabi et al. [44] found that micro steel fiber and polypropylene fiber improved the mechanical properties of concrete. Furthermore, cracks in the concrete had a significant effect on the durability of RC structures [36]. To improve the crack resistance of concrete, polymer fiber is an alternative solution. Polyoxymethylene (POM) fiber is a new kind of polymer fiber that presents outstanding alkali resistance and tensile properties [45]. POM fiber exhibits different mechanical properties from other fibers [46]. According to previous studies, the tensile strength of POM fiber is higher than that of polypropylene fiber, and the ductility of POM fiber is higher than that of glass fiber [35,47,48]. Although steel fiber has good tensile properties and ductility, the large amounts of chloride ions in seawater sea-sand concrete may cause corrosion of steel fiber. In conclusion, POM fiber is more suitable for seawater sea-sand concrete than other fibers. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there has been little investigation of SWSSC reinforced with POM fiber. The effects of POM fiber on the early-age cracking performance and mechanical properties of SWSSC are still not clear.
To clarify the aforementioned issue, fundamental studies of SWSSC reinforced with POM fiber were conducted to support its widespread application in actual structures. Experimental investigations of the workability, early-age cracking performance, and mechanical properties of SWSSC reinforced with POM fiber were performed. Details of the materials and test methods used are introduced in Section 2. Based on references in the code, workability tests, early-age cracking tests, cube and axial compressive tests, splitting tests, and flexural tests were conducted in this study. The results of the above tests for different mechanical properties are introduced in Section 3. Based on the test results, predictive equations were proposed to quantify the effects of POM fiber on the mechanical properties of SWSSC, and a stress–strain model for SWSSC was suggested.

2. Experimental Program

2.1. Raw Materials

2.1.1. Seawater and Sea Sand

It is worth noting that the seawater and sea sand used in the SWSSC experiment were all untreated. The seawater was taken from Quanzhou (118.36° E, 24.56° N) in Fujian Province, China. The chemical composition of the seawater is shown in Table 1. Compared with those of tap water, the ion contents of the seawater were much higher—particularly the Cl and Na+. The sea sand used in the test was taken from Guangzhou (113.17° E, 23.79° N) in Guangdong Province, China. Before the specimens’ production, the sea sand was dried in the Sun to control its moisture content. Then, a screening test was conducted to determine the fineness modulus (Mx) of the untreated sea sand. The screening test standard of the sand was in accordance with JGJ 52-2006 [49]. The Mx was determined through Equation (1), where A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, and A6 denote the cumulative percentages of sieve residues for sieves with diameters of 4.75, 2.36, 1.18, 0.6, 0.3, and 0.15 mm, respectively. The test results are shown in Table 2. After calculation, it turned out that Mx = 2.41. The sea sand fitted the requirements of the medium sand category, indicating that the sea sand could be used in the production of SWSSC specimens.
M x = ( A 2 + A 3 + A 4 + A 5 + A 6 ) 5 A 1 100 A 1

2.1.2. POM Fiber

The POM fiber was used in this study to improve the early-age cracking resistance and mechanical properties of SWSSC. The physical properties of the POM fiber were tested by Yuntianhua Co., Ltd., Yunnan, China, as shown in Table 3. As shown in Figure 1, the diameter and length of the POM fiber were 0.2 mm and 12 mm, respectively. The POM fiber exhibited outstanding alkali resistance, indicating that it has wide applicability in concrete structures. Furthermore, the POM fiber used in this study did not easily agglomerate, which reduced the difficulty of construction.

2.2. Mixture Proportions and Specimen Preparation

For the experimental investigation in this study, a total of six kinds of SWSSC mixtures were included, as shown in Table 4. NF was the control group, which incorporated no fiber in the mixture. POM-0.2 denotes that the POM fiber volume fraction (ρ) was 0.2%. Specimens were prepared under the same laboratory conditions. We weighed the sea sand, coarse aggregates, and cement according to the mix proportions, poured them into the mixer, and dry-mixed them for 1 min. After that, we added seawater and admixture into the mixer and mixed for a further 1 min. Finally, POM fiber was evenly sprinkled into the concrete mixture, and mixing continued for another 2 min. This operation ensured that the POM fiber was evenly distributed in the concrete. After mixing, the early-age cracking behavior and workability of the SWSSC were investigated. As for the test specimens used for the mechanical properties tests, a vibration table was used to compact the SWSSC in molds. The specimens were removed from the molds one day after casting. Then, all of the specimens were cured in a standard curing room for 28 d at 20 ± 2 °C and 95% relative humidity. For each kind of mechanical test, 18 SWSSC specimens were prepared, as shown in Table 5. A total of 72 test specimens were included in this mechanical performance investigation.

2.3. Test Method

2.3.1. Workability Test

The workability of concrete reflects the consistency of the mixture, which directly affects the concrete’s quality and construction difficulty. To quantify the workability of different mixtures, slump and expansibility tests were performed, as shown in Figure 2. All W/C ratios of all SWSSC mixtures were controlled to be the same. According to GB/T 50080-2016 [50], a standard slump cone was used to measure the slump and expansibility of concrete. The expansibility was the average of expansibility 1 and expansibility 2.

2.3.2. Early-Age Cracking Test

To investigate the early-age cracking performance of SWSSC with different ρ, the knife-edge binding method recommended in GB/T 50082-2009 [51] was selected. The dimension of the test specimen was 800 mm × 600 mm × 100 mm, as shown in Figure 3. Seven crack induction units were distributed on the steel bottom board. Thirty minutes after casting, the wind speed at 100 mm above the center of the test specimen was controlled to be 5 m/s. The direction of the wind was parallel to that of the crack induction units. After 24 h of mixing with seawater, the cracking performance of the test specimen was recorded.

2.3.3. Mechanical Performance Test

To investigate mechanical properties of SWSSC with POM fiber, the cube compressive, axial compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural tests were performed with reference to the code GB/T 50081-2002 [52], as shown in Figure 4. Considering the uncertainty of the mechanical properties of SWSSC, three specimens were prepared for each kind of mechanical property test and SWSSC mixture. For the cube and axial compressive tests, the loading rate was 0.5 MPa/s. The cube compressive strength (fcu) and axial compressive strength (fc) were determined through Equations (2) and (3), respectively, where A and F denote the bearing area and failure load of the test specimen, respectively. For the splitting tensile and flexural tests, the loading rate was 0.05 MPa/s. The splitting tensile strength (ft) and flexural strength (ff) were determined through Equations (4) and (5), respectively, where As, b, and h denote the splitting area of the test specimen and the height and width of the cross-section, respectively, while l denotes the span between supports. Given the dimensions of the test specimens and the references in the code GB/T 50081-2002 [52], the conversion factors for fcu, fc, ft, and ff were 0.95, 0.95, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively.
f c u = F A
f c = F A
f t = 2 F π A s = 0.637 F A s
f f = F l b h 2

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of POM Fiber on the Workability of SWSSC

The test results of SWSSC with different ρ reflected the effects of POM fiber on workability. The slump and expansibility are shown in Figure 5 and Table 6. Based on the test results, with increases in ρ, the slump and expansibility decreased. Compared with the NF mixture, for the POM-1 mixture, the decreases in slump and expansibility were 110.6 and 91.9 mm, respectively. When ρ was larger than 0.6, there were obvious increases in the descent rates of slump and expansibility of the SWSSC mixtures.

3.2. Effects of POM Fiber on the Early-Age Cracking of SWSSC

Different indices are included in this section to quantify the early-age cracking performance of SWSSC mixtures with different ρ. The index ac determined by Equation (6) indicates the mean area per crack. In Equation (6), N denotes the number of cracks, Wi denotes the peak width of crack i, and Li denotes the length of crack i. The index bc determined by Equation (7) indicates the number of cracks per unit area. In Equation (7), As denotes the area of the slab. The index cc determined by Equation (8) indicates the total crack area per unit area, which was determined by the indices ac and bc. The coefficient of variation (COV) of the crack area was selected to quantify the uncertainty of the early-age cracking performance of SWSSC mixtures with different ρ.
a c = 1 2 N i = 1 N ( W i × L i )
b c = N / A s
c c = a c × b c
After the tests, the early-age crackling performances of all of the SWSSC specimens were recorded, as shown in Figure 6. It was clear that with increases in ρ, obvious increases in early-age cracking resistance were observed. A digital image processing technique was used to accurately determine the dimensions of the cracks, as shown in Figure 7. The measurement accuracy of the above technique was 0.01 mm. After calculation, the test results of early-age cracking performance were recorded, as listed in Table 7. It can be seen that with increases in ρ, the indices ac, bc, and cc decreased. The descent rate of cc was greater than that of ac and bc, as shown in Figure 8. The POM-1 specimen showed the best early-age cracking resistance. Compared with those of the NF specimen, the ac, bc, and cc of the POM-1 specimen decreased by 77.0%, 89.4%, and 97.6%, respectively. When ρ was smaller than 0.4, the COV of the crack area was relatively large. When ρ was larger than 0.6, the COV of the crack area was relatively small. There was a clear decrease in the COV of the crack area when ρ increased from 0.4 to 0.6, as shown in Figure 8d. In general, the POM fiber had a significant effect on the improvement of the early-age cracking resistance of SWSSC.

3.3. Effects of POM Fiber on the Mechanical Performance of SWSSC

3.3.1. Cube Compressive Performance

After testing, the results of cube compressive strength for all SWSSC specimens were obtained, as shown in Table 8. For each ρ, three specimens were included in the test. For the test results of all cube compressive specimens, the COV ranged from 0.0072 to 0.0510, indicating good stability. The mean value of three specimens was selected to determine the fcu of SWSSC with different ρ. It was clear that when ρ was smaller than 0.6%, with increases in ρ, the fcu of SWSSC increased, as shown in Figure 9. Under the compressive load, microcracks occurred in the concrete. With increases in the compressive load, microcracks developed and were connected to one another. Then, a failure surface was formed in the concrete. When there was POM fiber, transverse deformation of the concrete was constrained, which delayed the development of microcracks. Therefore, when the ρ was relatively small (0~0.6%), it had a beneficial effect on the fcu. Too many fibers in the SWSSC increased the difficulty of mixing the concrete, resulting in a decrease in the compactness of the SWSSC. The size and quantity of holes in the SWSSC increased, leading to the reduction in fcu. Therefore, based on test results, when ρ was larger than 0.6%, the increases in ρ led to decreases in fcu. Similar test results of fiber-reinforced concrete were observed in [48,53]. Based on the tests conducted in this study, the optimal value of ρ was 0.6%. For the fcu of SWSSC specimens with ρ = 0.6%, the fcu = 66.39 MPa, and the 95% confidence interval range was from 64.56 MPa to 68.22 MPa. To effectively quantify the effect of ρ on the fcu of SWSSC, a predictive equation was used in this study. Polynomial models are often used to fit experimental data [54,55,56,57]. A polynomial model was selected based on the cube compressive test results of SWSSC specimens with different ρ, as shown in Equation (9), where ρ is expressed in percentage terms. A comparison between the test and numerical results was performed, as shown in Figure 10, where fcu0-mean denotes the mean value of fcu0. It was believed that the proposed Equation (9) could be used to predict the fcu of SWSSC specimens with different ρ effectively. The mechanical properties of POM-SWSSC and other types of fiber-reinforced concrete were analyzed, as shown in Figure 11. It can be seen that the fiber reduced the compressive properties of the self-compacting concrete. However, for SWSSC and high-strength concrete, fiber could slightly improve their compressive strength, with an increase of about 10–20%. For POM-SWSSC, with the increase in fiber content (ρ ≤ 1%), the compressive strength was similar to that of steel-fiber-reinforced ultrahigh-performance cementitious composites, which first increased and then decreased.
The effects of POM fiber on the failure performance of SWSSC specimens were observed (see Figure 12). The NF specimen was the control group without POM fiber. After the cube compressive test, the NF specimen was crushed. A typical cone-shaped failure performance was observed, as shown in Figure 12a. For SWSSC specimens with POM fiber, even though the spalling of concrete was observed, the degree was obviously less than that of the NF specimen. The POM fiber distributed between the vertical cracks exerted a bridging effect, as shown in Figure 13. For SWSSC specimens with POM fiber, there were connections between the cracks, unlike the NF specimen. The vertical cracks were restrained by the POM fiber. A similar phenomenon was observed in [53]. As a result, the integrity of specimens with POM fiber was almost entirely preserved. Furthermore, the stress concentration caused by the cracks in the concrete could be relieved by the POM fiber, which limited the development of cracks.
f c u = ( 0.4017 ρ 2 + 0.5023 ρ + 0.9857 ) f c u 0 m e a n

3.3.2. Axial Compressive Performance

The test results of the axial compressive strength of the SWSSC specimens with different ρ are presented in Table 9. Compared with the test results of fcu, the uncertainty of the test results of fc was larger. The mean value of three specimens was selected to determine the fc of SWSSC. Based on the test results, when ρ was smaller than 0.4, with increases in ρ, the fc of the SWSSC specimens increased, as shown in Figure 14. When ρ = 0.6, there was a clear decrease in fc. For SWSSC specimens with ρ = 0.6~1.0, with increases in ρ, the fc increased. For all of the test results of axial compressive strength, the COV ranged from 0.0423 to 0.1042. The test results of SWSSC specimens with ρ = 1.0 showed the greatest uncertainty, with a standard deviation of 4.50 and COV of 0.1042. It is worth noting that the aforementioned uncertainty was also observed in many previous experimental studies on concrete [7,33,36,48]. For the SWSSC specimens with ρ = 1%, the fc = 43.16 MPa, and the 95% confidence interval range was from 34.16 MPa to 52.16 MPa. To quantify the effect of ρ on the fc of SWSSC, a predictive equation was used in this study. A polynomial was selected based on the axial compressive test results of SWSSC specimens with different ρ, as shown in Equation (10). A comparison between the test and numerical results was performed, as shown in Figure 15, where fc0-mean denotes the mean value of fc0. It was believed that the proposed Equation (10) could be used to predict the change trend of fc of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
After the axial compressive test, the failure performances of SWSSC specimens with different ρ were recorded, as shown in Figure 16. For the NF specimen, the vertical microcracks occurred in the test specimen at the beginning of loading. With increases in the loading procedure, the microcracks merged into diagonal cracks. Then, spalling of the concrete was observed, as shown in Figure 16a. For SWSSC specimens with POM fiber, there were connections between the cracked concretes. Even though the spalling of concrete was observed, it was effectively limited by the POM fiber in the SWSSC. The above failure performance of the axial compressive test specimens was similar to that of cube compressive test specimens. Because of the aforementioned bridging effect, the microcracks were restrained by the POM fiber. The transition from microcracks to macrocracks was thereby delayed. The integrity of the SWSSC specimens with POM fiber was almost entirely preserved—especially for SWSSC specimens with ρ = 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.8%. The cracking features of the POM-0.8 specimen were clearly different from those of the NF specimen. Compared with the NF specimen, the cracks in the POM-0.8 specimen were dispersed across a larger area. The reason for this might be that the POM fiber in the SWSSC alleviated the stress concentration at the crack location, enhancing the ductility of the SWSSC specimen. As for the POM-1 specimen, the presence of too many POM fibers in the SWSSC reduced the compactness. There was a diagonal crack in the POM-1 specimen, which was similar to that of the NF specimen. In general, the ductility of the axial compressive test specimens was improved by the POM fiber in the SWSSC.
f c = ( 1.149 ρ 3 1.820 ρ 2 + 0.8701 ρ + 1.003 ) f c 0 m e a n

3.3.3. Splitting Tensile Performance

The splitting tensile test results of the SWSSC specimens with different ρ were recorded, as shown in Table 10. For all of the test results of splitting tensile strength, the COV ranged from 0.0395 to 0.0971. The mean value of three specimens was selected to determine the ft of SWSSC specimens with different ρ. It was clear that with increases in the ρ, the ft of SWSSC specimens with different ρ exhibited unimodal distribution, as shown in Figure 17. Hence, there was an optimal value of ρ. When ρ was smaller than 0.6, with increases in ρ, the ft of the SWSSC specimens increased. As mentioned previously, the presence of too many POM fibers led to increases in the size and quantity of holes in the concrete, reducing its mechanical properties. Then, when ρ was larger than 0.6, the increases in ρ led to decreases in ft. Compared with that of the NF specimen, the ft of the POM-0.2, POM-0.4, POM-0.6, POM-0.8, and POM-1 specimens increased by 5.1%, 11.6%, 20.2%, 13.9%, and 11.6%, respectively. Based on the tests conducted in this study, the optimal value of ρ was 0.6%. For the SWSSC specimens with ρ = 0.6%, the ft = 3.68 MPa, and the 95% confidence interval range was from 3.09 MPa to 4.26 MPa. A predictive equation was determined to effectively clarify the effect of ρ on the ft of the SWSSC specimens. Given the distribution features of the test results, a polynomial was proposed based on the splitting tensile test results of the SWSSC specimens with different ρ, as shown in Equation (11). A comparison between the test and numerical results was performed, as shown in Figure 18, where ft0-mean denotes the mean value of ft0. Therefore, the proposed Equation (11) could be used to effectively predict the ft of SWSSC specimens with different ρ. The tensile strength of POM-SWSSC and other types of fiber-reinforced concrete was analyzed, as shown in Figure 19. Unlike the compressive properties (Figure 11), the fiber could improve the tensile strength of concrete—especially for steel-fiber-reinforced ultra-high-strength concrete. With the addition of fiber, the tensile strength of the ultrahigh-strength concrete was improved by more than 120%. The tensile strength of POM-SWSSC was improved by about 20%, which is slightly lower than of the increase seen in other fiber-reinforced concretes.
The failure performances of the splitting tensile test specimens were observed, as shown in Figure 20. For the NF specimen, cracks occurred in the middle of the SWSSC specimens with increases in load. A clear separation in concretes was observed, indicating a brittle failure mode. For the SWSSC specimens with different ρ, the cracks were restrained by the POM fiber. The crack widths of the POM-SWSSC specimens were much smaller than those of the NF specimen, as shown in Figure 20. The bridging effect caused by the POM fiber was observed in the cracks, as shown in Figure 21. No separation was observed in the POM-SWSSC specimens. After the splitting tensile test, the integrity of the SWSSC specimens with POM fiber was preserved. The stress concentration caused by the cracks was relieved by the POM fiber, which delayed the crack propagation. The SWSSC specimens with POM fiber tended to exhibit a ductile failure mode. The cracks in the POM-1 specimen were more obvious than those in other test specimens with POM fiber, which might be because the presence of too many fibers in the SWSSC reduced its compactness. To obtain the best enhancing effect of POM fiber on the splitting tensile performance of SWSSC, it is important to determine the proper ρ.
f t = ( 0.3929 ρ 2 + 0.5261 ρ + 0.9852 ) f t 0 m e a n

3.3.4. Flexural Performance

The flexural test results of the SWSSC specimens are shown in Table 11. For all of the flexural specimens, the COV ranged from 0.0140 to 0.0605, showing good stability. The mean value of three specimens was selected to determine the ff of the SWSSC specimens with different ρ. It can be seen that when the ρ was smaller than 0.6, with increases in ρ, the ff of the SWSSC specimens increased, as shown in Figure 22. However, when the ρ was larger than 0.6, the increase in ρ resulted in decreases in ff, similar to the ft of the SWSSC specimens. Based on the test results, the optimal value of ρ was 0.6%. For the test results of SWSSC specimens with ρ = 0.6%, the ff = 7.08 MPa, and the 95% confidence interval range was from 6.88 MPa to 7.28 MPa. Compared with that of NF specimens, the ff of the POM-0.2, POM-0.4, POM-0.6, POM-0.8, and POM-1 specimens were increased by 1.1%, 6.7%, 9.2%, 5.9%, and 0.8%, respectively. A predictive equation was proposed to effectively quantify the effect of ρ on the ff of the SWSSC specimens. A polynomial was selected based on the flexural test results of SWSSC specimens with different ρ, as shown in Equation (12). A comparison between the test and numerical results was performed, as shown in Figure 23, where ff0-mean denotes the mean value of ff0. It was believed that the proposed Equation (12) could be used to effectively predict the ff of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
After the flexural tests, the failure performances of the SWSSC specimens were recorded, as shown in Figure 24. For the NF specimen, cracks in the concrete developed quickly. Then, the NF specimen suddenly broke into two pieces. There was no advanced phenomenon observed before the failure. Therefore, the NF specimen exhibited a brittle failure mode after the flexural test. As for the test specimens with POM fiber, cracking was restrained by the POM fiber. The crack widths of the test specimens with POM fiber were much smaller than those of the NF specimen. Even though cracks occurred in the flexural test specimens with POM fiber, no separation was observed, indicating that the ductility of the SWSSC specimens was enhanced by POM fiber. Because of the bridging effect caused by the POM fiber, the integrity of the SWSSC specimens with POM fiber was almost entirely preserved after the flexural test. When ρ = 0.6, the POM fiber showed the most significant effects in reducing the length and width of flexural cracks (see Figure 24).
f f = ( 0.2977 ρ 2 + 0.3276 ρ + 0.9851 ) f f 0 m e a n

3.4. Complete Stress–Strain Curve of SWSSC

The complete stress–strain curve of SWSSC was obtained according to the axial compressive test (Figure 25). To better describe the stress–strain evolution law of SWSSC with different ρ, the dimensionless stress and strain data were used to draw dimensionless complete stress–strain curves, as shown in Figure 26. Due to the brittle failure of SWSSC without fiber, the specimens failed instantaneously when the peak load was reached. As a result, the stress and strain data after the peak point could not be obtained, so the complete stress–strain curve of NF had only an ascending segment. The POM fiber could help to prevent the development of cracks in the concrete, slowing down the failure process [35]. Therefore, complete stress and strain data of POM-0.2–POM-1 could be obtained.
The axial compression process of SWSSC can be divided into four stages: When σ < 0.3fc, cracks had not yet initiated, and there was mainly elastic deformation in the specimen. Therefore, the anti-cracking effect of POM fiber could not be exerted. The stress–strain curves of SWSSC with and without POM fiber were essentially the same, showing a linear upward trend. As the load increased (0.3 fc < σ <0.85 fc), a large number of microcracks appeared on the surface of the specimen and extended from the loading end to the subsurface. At this stage, the cracks developed stably, and there were no obvious macroscopic cracks on the surface of the specimen. The stress–strain curve was convex and nonlinear. When 0.85 fc < σ < fc, macroscopic cracks began to appear on the surface of the specimen and developed rapidly due to the acceleration of horizontal expansion. The crack propagation rate of POM-SWSSC was reduced to a certain extent due to the anti-cracking effect of the POM fiber. When the load reached the peak value, the cracks penetrated and formed a failure surface. There were obvious macroscopic cracks on the surface, and the fibers passing through the failure surface were pulled out or broken from the matrix. The stress–strain curves of the POM-SWSSC specimens at this stage became gentler compared with that of NF-SWSSC. Furthermore, the gentle degree of the stress–strain curve was positively correlated with the ρ. The specimens showed better toughness and ductility with the increase in ρ. After the stress reached fc, the bearing capacity decreased rapidly, and the stress–strain curve dropped suddenly. The NF-SWSSC specimens were rapidly destroyed at this stage, so the complete descent stage data could not be obtained. Meanwhile, the descending sections of the stress–strain curves of the POM-SWSSC specimens were complete, because the fibers that were not pulled out or broken bore part of the load, delaying the failure process of the specimen.
In order to better describe the stress–strain relationship of concrete, we proposed a variety of typical equations for the complete stress–strain curve of concrete under uniaxial compression (Equations (13)–(17)). The rising section of the stress–strain curve was generally described by polynomial, exponent, and rational fraction equations, while the descending section was described by rational fraction equations (Table 12). Since the shape of the complete stress–strain curve of SWSSC was close to that of ordinary concrete, the above typical models were used to describe the stress–strain relationship of SWSSC. Based on the test data, the stress–strain relationship of SWSSC with and without POM was fitted with the above typical models. The fitting results and fitting accuracy are given in Table 13. As shown in Figure 27, it was found that except for the exponent equations, the fitting results of the other types of equations were in good agreement with the test results, with R2 > 0.98.
The polynomial model proposed by Guo Zhenhai [62] has only two coefficients, making it simpler than other models. According to the test results, it was found that this model was accurate in describing the stress–strain relationships of SWSSC with and without POM fiber. Therefore, this polynomial model was suggested to quantify the stress–strain relationships of SWSSC with and without POM fiber. The fiber volume fractions (ρ) affected the stress–strain relationship of the SWSSC. Based on the test results, the influence of the fiber volume fraction (ρ) on the stress–strain model was analyzed. Equations (18) and (19) describe the relationships between the model coefficients (A and B, respectively) and ρ. According to Equations (13), (18), and (19), the complete stress–strain curve of SWSSC with any POM fiber content could be determined.
A = 42.47 ρ 4 77.35 ρ 3 + 41.27 ρ 2 5.066 ρ + 1.091       R 2 = 0.9687
B = 39.82 ρ 4 104.2 ρ 3 + 91.56 ρ 2 30.38 ρ + 4.079       R 2 = 0.9632

4. Conclusions

In this study, POM fiber was innovatively applied to SWSSC, and the fresh and hardened properties of SWSSC reinforced with POM fiber were experimentally studied. The effects of the POM fiber on the workability, early-age cracking performance, and mechanical properties of SWSSC with different ρ were discussed based on the experimental results. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
The workability of SWSSC mixtures with different ρ was investigated through the experiment. With increases in ρ, the slump and expansibility decreased. Compared with the NF mixture, for the POM-1 mixture, the decreases in slump and expansibility were 110.6 and 91.9 mm, respectively. When ρ was larger than 0.6, there were obvious increases in the descent rates of slump and expansibility of the SWSSC mixtures.
(2)
Based on the knife-edge binding method, experiments on the early-age cracking performance of SWSSC mixtures with different ρ were conducted. The test results indicated that the POM fiber had a significant effect in improving the early-age cracking resistance of SWSSC. Compared with those of the NF specimens, the ac, bc, and cc of the POM-1 specimens decreased by 77.0%, 89.4%, and 97.6%, respectively.
(3)
Cube and axial compressive tests were conducted to clarify the effects of POM fiber on the compressive properties of SWSSC. When ρ was smaller than 0.6, with increases in ρ, the fcu of the SWSSC specimens increased. When ρ was larger than 0.6, the increase in ρ led to decreases in fcu. When ρ was smaller than 0.4, with increases in ρ, the fc of the SWSSC specimens increased. When ρ = 0.6, there was a clear decrease in fc. For SWSSC specimens with ρ = 0.6~1.0, with increases in ρ, the fc increased.
(4)
The ft and ff of SWSSC specimens with different ρ exhibited unimodal distribution. Compared with that of the NF specimen, the ft of the POM-0.2, POM-0.4, POM-0.6, POM-0.8, and POM-1 specimens was increased by 5.1%, 11.6%, 20.2%, 13.9%, and 11.6%, respectively. Results of flexural test indicated that compared with that of the NF specimens, ff of POM-0.2, POM-0.4, POM-0.6, POM-0.8 and POM-1 specimens were increased by 1.1%, 6.7%, 9.2%, 5.9% and 0.8%, respectively.
(5)
The failure performances of the test specimens after cube and axial compressive tests, splitting tensile tests, and flexural tests were recorded. For the NF specimens, brittle failure modes were observed. For the test specimens with POM fiber, the stress concentration caused by cracks in the concrete was relieved by the POM fiber. POM fiber performed a bridging effect, building connections between cracked concretes. The integrity of the SWSSC specimens with POM fiber was almost entirely preserved, indicating ductile failure modes.
(6)
To quantify the effects of POM fiber on the fcu, fc, ft, and ff of SWSSC with different ρ, predictive equations were proposed based on the test results. Comparisons between the results from predictive equations and the test results were performed, proving the effectiveness of the predictive equations.
(7)
The effects of different stress–strain models in describing the stress–strain relationships of SWSSC with and without POM fiber were compared, and a polynomial model suitable for SWSSC was suggested. According to the model, the complete stress–strain curve of SWSSC with any POM fiber content could be determined.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.W. and X.X.; methodology, X.X.; software, N.W.; validation, Y.Y., L.H. and Z.C.; formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, X.X.; writing—review and editing, F.W.; supervision, J.H.; project administration, J.H.; funding acquisition, N.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received external funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 52108115; and the Special Funding for Research Projects of Postdoctoral Researchers in Chongqing, grant number XmT20200011. The APC was funded by J.H.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 52108115; and the Special Funding for Research Projects of Postdoctoral Researchers in Chongqing, grant number XmT20200011. The authors also wish to acknowledge the support from China West Construction Group Co., Ltd.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, N.; Zhou, F.; Li, Z.; Xu, Z.; Xu, H. Experimental and numerical investigation on the L-joint composed of steel-plate composite (SC) walls under seismic loading. Eng. Struct. 2020, 227, 111360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, N.; Zhou, F.; Li, Z.; Xu, Z.; Xu, H. Behavior of L-joint composed of steel-plate composite wall and reinforced concrete wall. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2020, 176, 106439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xiao, J.; Qiang, C.; Nanni, A.; Zhang, K. Use of sea-sand and seawater in concrete construction: Current status and future opportunities. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 155, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Younis, A.; Ebead, U.; Suraneni, P.; Nanni, A. Fresh and hardened properties of seawater-mixed concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 190, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, G.; Hua, J.; Wang, N.; Deng, W.; Xue, X. Material Alternatives for Concrete Structures on Remote Islands: Based on Life-cycle cost Analysis. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2022, 2022, 7329408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shi, Z.; Shui, Z.; Li, Q.; Geng, H. Combined effect of metakaolin and sea water on performance and microstructures of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 74, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, Z.; Wu, G.; Zhu, H. Mechanical properties of seawater sea-sand concrete reinforced with discrete BFRP-Needles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 206, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Younis, A.; Ebead, U.; Judd, S. Life cycle cost analysis of structural concrete using seawater, recycled concrete aggregate, and GFRP reinforcement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 175, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pasupathy, K.; Sanjayan, J.; Rajeev, P.; Law, D.W. The effect of chloride ingress in reinforced geopolymer concrete exposed in the marine environment. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 39, 102281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hua, J.; Wang, F.; Huang, L.; Wang, N.; Xue, X. Experimental study on mechanical properties of corroded stainless-clad bimetallic steel bars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 287, 123019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fernandez, I.; Bairán, J.M.; Marí, A.R. Corrosion effects on the mechanical properties of reinforcing steel bars. Fatigue and σ-ε behavior. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 101, 772–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hua, J.; Fan, H.; Xue, X.; Wang, F.; Chen, Z.; Huang, L.; Wang, N. Tensile and low-cycle fatigue performance of bimetallic steel bars with corrosion. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 43, 103188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hua, J.; Wang, F.; Wang, N.; Huang, L.; Hai, L.; Li, Y.; Zhu, X.; Xue, X. Experimental and numerical investigations on corroded stainless-clad bimetallic steel bar with artificial damage. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 102779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tang, F.; Lin, Z.; Chen, G.; Yi, W. Three-dimensional corrosion pit measurement and statistical mechanical degradation analysis of deformed steel bars subjected to accelerated corrosion. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 70, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hua, J.; Fan, H.; Yan, W.; Wang, N.; Xue, X.; Huang, L. Seismic resistance of the corroded bimetallic steel bar under different strain amplitudes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 319, 126088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, X.; Ye, D.; Li, H.; Yu, H. Corrosion characteristics of S23043 duplex stainless steel bars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 178, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Limbert, J.; Afshan, S.; Kashani, M.; Robinson, A. Compressive stress–strain behaviour of stainless steel reinforcing bars with the effect of inelastic buckling. Eng. Struct. 2021, 237, 112098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Y.; Davalos, J.F.; Ray, I. Durability prediction for GFRP reinforcing bars using short-term data of accelerated aging tests. J. Compos. Constr. 2006, 10, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. MRobert, M.; Wang, P.; Cousin, P.; Benmokrane, B. Temperature as an accelerating factor for long-term durability testing of FRPs: Should there be any limitations? J. Compos. Constr. 2010, 14, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hua, J.; Wang, F.; Xiang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xue, X.; Huang, L.; Wang, N. Mechanical properties of stainless-clad bimetallic steel bars exposed to elevated temperatures. Fire Saf. J. 2022, 127, 103521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, F.; Hua, J.; Xue, X.; Ding, Z.; Lyu, Y.; Liu, Q. Low-cycle fatigue performance of bimetallic steel bar considering the effect of inelastic buckling. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 351, 128787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hua, J.; Wang, F.; Xue, X.; Ding, Z.; Chen, Z. Residual monotonic mechanical properties of bimetallic steel bar with fatigue damage. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 55, 104703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hua, J.; Wang, F.; Yang, Z.; Xue, X.; Huang, L.; Chen, Z. Low-cycle fatigue properties of bimetallic steel bars after exposure to elevated temperature. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2021, 187, 106959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ogunsanya, I.G.; Strong, V.; Hansson, C.M. Corrosion behavior of austenitic 304L and 316LN stainless steel clad reinforcing bars in cracked concrete. Mater. Corros. 2020, 71, 1066–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hua, J.; Wang, F.; Xue, X. Study on fatigue properties of post-fire bimetallic steel bar with different cooling methods. Structures 2022, 40, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ban, H.; Chen, Z.; Xiang, Y.; Li, Z. Bond behaviour of stainless-clad bimetallic rebar in concrete. Structures 2022, 37, 1069–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hua, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, F.; Xue, X.; Wang, N.; Huang, L. Relation between the metallographic structure and mechanical properties of a bimetallic steel bar after fire. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2022, 34, 04022193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hua, J.; Wang, F.; Xue, X.; Fan, H.; Yan, W. Fatigue properties of bimetallic steel bar: An experimental and numerical study. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022, 136, 106212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, Y.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, X.; Xue, X.; Xiang, Y. Post-fire performance of bonding interface in explosion-welded stainless-clad bimetallic steel. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2022, 193, 107285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shi, Y.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, X.; Xue, X.; Li, J. Post-fire mechanical properties of titanium–clad bimetallic steel in different cooling approaches. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2022, 191, 107169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xue, X.Y.; Zhou, X.; Shi, Y.; Xiang, Y. Ultimate shear resistance of S600E high-strength stainless steel plate girders. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2021, 179, 106535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ban, H.; Zhu, J.; Shi, G.; Zhang, Y. Tests and modelling on cyclic behaviour of stainless-clad bimetallic steel. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2020, 166, 105944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, M.; Hu, B.; Xing, F.; Zhou, X.; Sun, M.; Sui, L.; Zhou, Y. Characterization of the mechanical properties of eco-friendly concrete made with untreated sea sand and seawater based on statistical analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 234, 117339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, P.; Li, W.; Yu, T.; Qu, F.; Tam, V.W. Investigation on early-age hydration, mechanical properties and microstructure of seawater sea sand cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 249, 118776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, F.; Hua, J.; Xue, X.; Wang, N.; Yao, Y. Effects of Polyoxymethylene Fiber on Mechanical Properties of Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete with Different Ages. Polymers 2022, 14, 3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xiao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, P.; Shen, L.; Qiang, C. Mechanical behavior of concrete using seawater and sea-sand with recycled coarse aggregates. Struct. Concr. 2019, 20, 1631–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hua, J.; Yang, Z.; Xue, X.; Huang, L.; Wang, N.; Chen, Z. Bond properties of bimetallic steel bar in seawater sea-sand concrete at different ages. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 323, 126539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Quagliarini, E.; Monni, F.; Bondioli, F.; Lenci, S. Basalt fiber ropes and rods: Durability tests for their use in building engineering. J. Build. Eng. 2016, 5, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alrekabi, S.; Cundy, A.; Lampropoulos, A.; Whitby, R.; Savina, I. Mechanical performance of novel cement-based composites prepared with nano-fibres, and hybrid nano- and micro-fibres. Compos. Struct. 2017, 178, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Raza, S.S.; Qureshi, L.A. Effect of carbon fiber on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete exposed to elevated temperatures. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 42, 102503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Navabi, D.; Javidruzi, M.; Hafezi, M.R.; Mosavi, A. The high-performance light transmitting concrete and experimental analysis of using polymethylmethacrylate optical fibers in it. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 38, 102076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ozutok, A.; Madenci, E.; Kadioglu, F. Free vibration analysis of angle-ply laminate composite beams by mixed finite element formulation using the Gâteaux differential. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2014, 21, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Saradar, A.; Tahmouresi, B.; Mohseni, E.; Shadmani, A. Restrained Shrinkage Cracking of Fiber-Reinforced High-Strength Concrete. Fibers 2018, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Alwesabi, E.A.; Abu Bakar, B.; Alshaikh, I.M.; Akil, H. Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of plain and rubberised concretes with steel–polypropylene hybrid fibre. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 233, 117194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Espinach, F.; Granda, L.A.; Tarrés, Q.; Duran, J.; Fullana-I-Palmer, P.; Mutjé, P. Mechanical and micromechanical tensile strength of eucalyptus bleached fibers reinforced polyoxymethylene composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 116, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gao, Y.; Sun, S.; He, Y.; Wang, X.; Wu, D. Effect of poly (ethylene oxide) on tribological performance and impact fracture behavior of polyoxymethylene/polytetrafluoroethylene fiber composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2011, 42, 1945–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, H.; Lin, X.; Zhou, A. A review of mechanical properties of fibre reinforced concrete at elevated temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2020, 135, 106117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, X.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, P.; Jiao, Z.; Zheng, W. Mechanical properties of basalt and polypropylene fibre-reinforced alkali-activated slag concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 269, 121284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. JGJ 52-2006; Standard for Technical Requirements and Test Method of Sand and Crushed Stone (or Gravel) for Ordinary Concrete. Ministry of Construction of the PR China: Beijing, China, 2006.
  50. GB 50080-2016; Standard for Test Method of Performance on Ordinary Fresh Concrete. China Standard Press: Beijing, China, 2016.
  51. GB/T 50082-2009; Standard for Test Methods of Long—Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete. China Building Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2009.
  52. GB/T 50081-2002; Standard for Test Method of Mechanical Properties on Ordinary Concrete. Ministry of Construction of the PR China: Beijing, China, 2002.
  53. Das, S.; Sobuz, H.R.; Tam, V.W.; Akid, A.S.M.; Sutan, N.M.; Rahman, F.M. Effects of incorporating hybrid fibres on rheological and mechanical properties of fibre reinforced concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 120561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hua, J.; Wang, F.; Xue, X.; Ding, Z.; Sun, Y.; Xiao, L. Ultra-low cycle fatigue performance of Q690 high-strength steel after exposure to elevated temperatures. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 5, 104832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hua, J.; Xue, X.; Huang, Q.; Shi, Y.; Deng, W. Post-fire performance of high-strength steel plate girders developing post-buckling capacity. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 52, 104442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hua, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Hai, L.; Wang, N.; Wang, F. Effects of exposure temperature on low–cycle fatigue properties of Q690 high–strength steel. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2022, 190, 107159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, X.; Xue, X.; Shi, Y.; Xu, J. Post-fire mechanical properties of Q620 high-strength steel with different cooling methods. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2021, 180, 106608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hesami, S.; Hikouei, I.S.; Emadi, S.A.A. Mechanical behavior of self-compacting concrete pavements incorporating recycled tire rubber crumb and reinforced with polypropylene fiber. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 133, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Iqbal, S.; Ali, A.; Holschemacher, K.; Bier, T.A. Mechanical properties of steel fiber reinforced high strength lightweight self-compacting concrete (SHLSCC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 98, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ren, G.; Wu, H.; Fang, Q.; Liu, J. Effects of steel fiber content and type on static mechanical properties of UHPCC. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 163, 826–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jin, L.; Zhang, R.; Tian, Y.; Dou, G.; Du, X. Experimental investigation on static and dynamic mechanical properties of steel fiber reinforced ultra-high-strength concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 178, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Guo, Z. Principle of Reinforced Concrete; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  63. Guo, Z. Strength and Deformation of Concrete-Test Basis and Constitutive Relation; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  64. Cui, T.; He, H.; Yan, W. Experimental Research on Uniaxial Compression Constitutive Model of Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composites. Materials 2019, 12, 2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. POM fiber used in this study.
Figure 1. POM fiber used in this study.
Polymers 14 04969 g001
Figure 2. Workability test (ρ = 0.6): (a) slump test; (b) expansibility test.
Figure 2. Workability test (ρ = 0.6): (a) slump test; (b) expansibility test.
Polymers 14 04969 g002
Figure 3. Early-age cracking test instrument.
Figure 3. Early-age cracking test instrument.
Polymers 14 04969 g003
Figure 4. Mechanical performance tests: (a) cube compressive test; (b) axial compressive test; (c) splitting tensile test; (d) flexural test.
Figure 4. Mechanical performance tests: (a) cube compressive test; (b) axial compressive test; (c) splitting tensile test; (d) flexural test.
Polymers 14 04969 g004
Figure 5. Test results of workability.
Figure 5. Test results of workability.
Polymers 14 04969 g005
Figure 6. Early-age cracking performance: (a) POM-0; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Figure 6. Early-age cracking performance: (a) POM-0; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Polymers 14 04969 g006aPolymers 14 04969 g006b
Figure 7. Method of measuring crack dimensions.
Figure 7. Method of measuring crack dimensions.
Polymers 14 04969 g007
Figure 8. Early-age cracking performance of SWSSC mixtures with different ρ: (a) mean area per crack; (b) number of cracks per unit area; (c) total crack area per unit area; (d) coefficient of variation.
Figure 8. Early-age cracking performance of SWSSC mixtures with different ρ: (a) mean area per crack; (b) number of cracks per unit area; (c) total crack area per unit area; (d) coefficient of variation.
Polymers 14 04969 g008
Figure 9. fcu of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
Figure 9. fcu of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
Polymers 14 04969 g009
Figure 10. Comparison between numerical and test results: fcu.
Figure 10. Comparison between numerical and test results: fcu.
Polymers 14 04969 g010
Figure 11. Comparison of compressive strength between POM-SWSSC and other types of fiber-reinforced concrete [58,59,60,61].
Figure 11. Comparison of compressive strength between POM-SWSSC and other types of fiber-reinforced concrete [58,59,60,61].
Polymers 14 04969 g011
Figure 12. Failure performances of SWSSC specimens after the cube compressive test: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.6.
Figure 12. Failure performances of SWSSC specimens after the cube compressive test: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.6.
Polymers 14 04969 g012
Figure 13. Bridging effect from POM fiber.
Figure 13. Bridging effect from POM fiber.
Polymers 14 04969 g013
Figure 14. fc of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
Figure 14. fc of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
Polymers 14 04969 g014
Figure 15. Comparison between numerical and test results: fc.
Figure 15. Comparison between numerical and test results: fc.
Polymers 14 04969 g015
Figure 16. Failure performances of SWSSC specimens after the axial compressive test: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Figure 16. Failure performances of SWSSC specimens after the axial compressive test: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Polymers 14 04969 g016aPolymers 14 04969 g016b
Figure 17. ft of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
Figure 17. ft of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
Polymers 14 04969 g017
Figure 18. Comparison between numerical and test results: ft.
Figure 18. Comparison between numerical and test results: ft.
Polymers 14 04969 g018
Figure 19. Comparison of tensile strength between POM-SWSSC and other types of fiber-reinforced concrete [58,59,60,61].
Figure 19. Comparison of tensile strength between POM-SWSSC and other types of fiber-reinforced concrete [58,59,60,61].
Polymers 14 04969 g019
Figure 20. Failure performance of splitting tensile tests: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Figure 20. Failure performance of splitting tensile tests: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Polymers 14 04969 g020aPolymers 14 04969 g020b
Figure 21. Bridging effect in the POM-0.8-3 splitting tensile test specimen.
Figure 21. Bridging effect in the POM-0.8-3 splitting tensile test specimen.
Polymers 14 04969 g021
Figure 22. ff of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
Figure 22. ff of SWSSC specimens with different ρ.
Polymers 14 04969 g022
Figure 23. Comparison between numerical and test results: ff.
Figure 23. Comparison between numerical and test results: ff.
Polymers 14 04969 g023
Figure 24. Failure performance of flexural tests: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Figure 24. Failure performance of flexural tests: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Polymers 14 04969 g024aPolymers 14 04969 g024b
Figure 25. Complete stress–strain curve under uniaxial compression.
Figure 25. Complete stress–strain curve under uniaxial compression.
Polymers 14 04969 g025
Figure 26. Dimensionless complete stress–strain curve.
Figure 26. Dimensionless complete stress–strain curve.
Polymers 14 04969 g026
Figure 27. Fitting results of complete stress–strain curves of each group of concrete under axial compression: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Figure 27. Fitting results of complete stress–strain curves of each group of concrete under axial compression: (a) NF; (b) POM-0.2; (c) POM-0.4; (d) POM-0.6; (e) POM-0.8; (f) POM-1.
Polymers 14 04969 g027
Table 1. Chemical composition of tap water, seawater, and sea sand.
Table 1. Chemical composition of tap water, seawater, and sea sand.
UnitClSO42−Na+K+Mg2+Ca2+
Tap watermg/L12.336.88.72.89.653.1
Seawatermg/L19,365.52537.511,208.7389.91321.7395.8
Sea sandmg/kg7.434.914.24.03.013.8
Table 2. Screening test results of sea sand.
Table 2. Screening test results of sea sand.
Sieve DiameterCumulative Percentages of Sieve Residue (%)
A14.75 mm4.0
A22.36 mm14.0
A31.18 mm29.4
A4600 μm49.0
A5300 μm68.6
A6150 μm90.6
<150 μm99.4
Table 3. Physical properties of the POM fiber.
Table 3. Physical properties of the POM fiber.
FiberDensity
(kg/m3)
Tensile Strength
(MPa)
Elongation
(%)
Melting Point
(°C)
Elastic Modulus
(GPa)
POM1400970181658
Table 4. Proportions of all SWSSC mixtures.
Table 4. Proportions of all SWSSC mixtures.
TypesCement (kg/m3) Fly Ash
(kg/m3)
Mineral Powder
(kg/m3)
Sea Sand
(kg/m3)
Coarse Aggregate
(kg/m3)
Seawater
(kg/m3)
Fiber
(kg/m3)
W/C Ratio
NF264888883110161600.00.36
POM-0.2264888883110161602.8
POM-0.4264888883110161605.6
POM-0.6264888883110161608.4
POM-0.82648888831101616011.2
POM-12648888831101616014.0
Table 5. Details of specimens.
Table 5. Details of specimens.
Test TypeSpecimen SizeQuantity of Specimens
NFPOM-0.2POM-0.4POM-0.6POM-0.8POM-1
Workability test-111111
Early-age cracking test800 mm × 600 mm × 100 mm111111
Cube compressive test100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm333333
Axial compressive test100 mm × 100 mm × 300 mm333333
Splitting tensile test100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm333333
Flexural test100 mm × 100 mm × 400 mm333333
Table 6. Test results of the workability of SWSSC.
Table 6. Test results of the workability of SWSSC.
TypesSlump (mm)Expansibility 1 (mm)Expansibility 2 (mm)Expansibility (mm)
NF175.2291.3286.5288.9
POM-0.2161.5244.3249.6247.0
POM-0.4144.9231.2223.4227.3
POM-0.6132.1235.1222.5228.8
POM-0.883.2204.4199.3201.9
POM-164.6198.1195.8197.0
Table 7. Test results of early-age cracking performance.
Table 7. Test results of early-age cracking performance.
Numberac (mm2)bc (m−2)cc (mm2/m2)COV
NF12.697.91237.91.29
POM-0.29.941.7411.11.20
POM-0.47.137.5266.41.37
POM-0.67.131.2222.70.70
POM-0.86.118.7114.30.66
POM-12.910.430.20.60
Table 8. Results of compressive tests of SWSSC with different mixes.
Table 8. Results of compressive tests of SWSSC with different mixes.
Numberfcu (MPa)fcu-mean (MPa)Standard DeviationCOV95% Confidence Interval
Lower RangeUpper Range
NF-158.6756.38 2.870.0510
NF-258.1550.6462.13
NF-352.33
POM-0.2-158.7858.330.420.0072
POM-0.2-258.4557.4959.17
POM-0.2-357.77
POM-0.4-163.2863.950.480.0075
POM-0.4-264.2363.0064.91
POM-0.4-364.35
POM-0.6-165.2966.390.910.0138
POM-0.6-266.3664.5668.22
POM-0.6-367.53
POM-0.8-162.1561.782.850.0461
POM-0.8-258.1256.0867.48
POM-0.8-365.07
POM-1-162.5561.772.110.0342
POM-1-263.8857.5466.00
POM-1-358.88
Table 9. Results of the axial compressive tests of SWSSC with different mixes.
Table 9. Results of the axial compressive tests of SWSSC with different mixes.
Numberfc (MPa)fc-mean (MPa)Standard DeviationCOV95% Confidence Interval
Lower RangeUpper Range
NF-134.9436.152.010.0555
NF-234.5332.1340.17
NF-338.98
POM-0.2-141.9440.382.660.0660
POM-0.2-242.5735.0545.71
POM-0.2-336.63
POM-0.4-140.4341.551.760.0423
POM-0.4-240.1838.0345.06
POM-0.4-344.03
POM-0.6-139.4139.022.220.0568
POM-0.6-241.5234.5843.46
POM-0.6-336.13
POM-0.8-145.7341.702.850.0684
POM-0.8-239.8836.0047.41
POM-0.8-339.50
POM-1-148.5543.164.500.1042
POM-1-243.3834.1652.16
POM-1-337.54
Table 10. Results of the splitting tensile tests of SWSSC with different mixes.
Table 10. Results of the splitting tensile tests of SWSSC with different mixes.
Numberft (MPa)ft-mean (MPa)Standard DeviationCOV95% Confidence Interval
Lower RangeUpper Range
NF-13.013.060.170.0559
NF-23.292.723.40
NF-32.88
POM-0.2-13.203.220.130.0395
POM-0.2-23.072.963.47
POM-0.2-33.38
POM-0.4-13.843.420.330.0971
POM-0.4-23.382.754.08
POM-0.4-33.03
POM-0.6-14.093.680.290.0795
POM-0.6-23.483.094.26
POM-0.6-33.46
POM-0.8-13.173.490.240.0680
POM-0.8-23.743.013.96
POM-0.8-33.55
POM-1-13.483.420.170.0507
POM-1-23.593.073.76
POM-1-33.18
Table 11. Results of flexural tests of SWSSC with different mixes.
Table 11. Results of flexural tests of SWSSC with different mixes.
Numberff (MPa)ff-mean (MPa)Standard DeviationCOV95% Confidence Interval
Lower RangeUpper Range
NF-16.786.480.240.0372
NF-26.196.006.97
NF-36.48
POM-0.2-16.496.560.090.0133
POM-0.2-26.686.386.73
POM-0.2-36.50
POM-0.4-16.726.920.420.0602
POM-0.4-27.506.887.28
POM-0.4-36.54
POM-0.6-17.227.080.100.0140
POM-0.6-27.026.887.28
POM-0.6-37.00
POM-0.8-16.916.870.110.0155
POM-0.8-26.976.657.08
POM-0.8-36.72
POM-1-16.276.540.190.0291
POM-1-26.646.166.92
POM-1-36.70
Table 12. Complete stress–strain curve equations for concrete under axial compression.
Table 12. Complete stress–strain curve equations for concrete under axial compression.
Equation TypeSourceEquation
Polynomial equationProposed by Zhenhai Guo [62] y = { A x + ( 3 2 A ) x 2 + ( A 2 ) x 3 , 0 x 1 x B ( x 1 ) 2 + x , x 1 (13)
Exponential equationProposed by Umenura [62] y = c ( e a x e b x ) (14)
Rational fraction equationProposed by Sargin [62] y = c 1 x + ( c 2 1 ) x 2 1 + ( c 1 2 ) x + c 2 x 2 (15)
Proposed by Al-Hassani [63] y = { A x 1 + ( 2 A 3 ) x 2 + ( 2 A ) x 3 , 0 x 1 x B ( x 1 ) 2 + x , x 1 (16)
Proposed by Saenz [64] y = x c 1 + c 2 x + c 3 x 2 + c 4 x 3 (17)
Note: x = ε / ε c , y = σ / f c .
Table 13. Fitting results of parameters.
Table 13. Fitting results of parameters.
StudyEquation CoefficientNFPOM-0.2POM-0.4POM-0.6POM-0.8POM-1
Zhenhai Guo [62]A1.0781.2381.6721.8141.1532.385
R20.99730.99020.99780.98460.99250.9932
B4.1130.72581.271.1341.5230.8837
R20.99060.99240.95450.93220.99630.9714
Umenura [62]a−0.3172−0.7386−0.9495−0.9203−0.8827−0.5342
b−0.3015−0.7783−0.9842−0.9679−0.9181−1.561
c−90.7549.447050.0859.272.568
R20.98020.96440.96010.95130.89980.9816
Sargin [62]c11.2371.0161.4351.5210.99152.165
c20.21281.0250.75490.75890.90570.7199
R20.99790.98040.99370.98380.99510.9893
Al-Hassani [63]A1.3191.3461.5261.6171.3651.871
R20.99620.99220.99820.99390.98650.9937
B4.1130.72581.271.1341.5230.8837
R20.99060.99240.95450.93220.99630.9714
Saenz [64]c10.76070.67150.58510.78781.0760.493
c20.29460.23140.2591−0.7334−1.18−0.0062
c3−0.8396−0.215−0.21490.93691.010.434
c40.7910.31830.3510.014890.087960.07669
R20.99750.99240.99520.990.99790.9921
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, X.; Wang, F.; Hua, J.; Wang, N.; Huang, L.; Chen, Z.; Yao, Y. Effects of Polyoxymethylene Fiber on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete. Polymers 2022, 14, 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224969

AMA Style

Xue X, Wang F, Hua J, Wang N, Huang L, Chen Z, Yao Y. Effects of Polyoxymethylene Fiber on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete. Polymers. 2022; 14(22):4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224969

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Xuanyi, Fei Wang, Jianmin Hua, Neng Wang, Lepeng Huang, Zengshun Chen, and Yunhang Yao. 2022. "Effects of Polyoxymethylene Fiber on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete" Polymers 14, no. 22: 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224969

APA Style

Xue, X., Wang, F., Hua, J., Wang, N., Huang, L., Chen, Z., & Yao, Y. (2022). Effects of Polyoxymethylene Fiber on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Seawater Sea-Sand Concrete. Polymers, 14(22), 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224969

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop