Species Composition, Diversity, and Biomass Estimation in Coastal and Marine Protected Areas of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia

Pesiu, Elizabeth; Lee, Gaik Ee; Salam, Muhammad Razali; Salim, Jamilah Mohd; Lau, Kah Hoo; Yong, Jean Wan Hong; Abdullah, Mohd Tajuddin

doi:10.3390/agronomy12102380

Open AccessArticle

Species Composition, Diversity, and Biomass Estimation in Coastal and Marine Protected Areas of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia

by

Elizabeth Pesiu

^1,*,

Gaik Ee Lee

^1,2,*

,

Muhammad Razali Salam

¹,

Jamilah Mohd Salim

¹,

Kah Hoo Lau

³,

Jean Wan Hong Yong

⁴

and

Mohd Tajuddin Abdullah

^5,6

¹

Faculty of Science and Marine Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia

²

Institute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia

³

Forest Biodiversity Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong 52109, Selangor, Malaysia

⁴

Department of Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden

⁵

Faculty of Fisheries and Food Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia

⁶

West Wing, Menara Matrade, Jalan Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Kuala Lumpur 50480, Selangor, Malaysia

^*

Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Agronomy 2022, 12(10), 2380; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102380

Submission received: 10 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 18 September 2022 / Published: 1 October 2022

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Plant Taxonomy and Floristic Studies)

Download

Browse Figures

Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

We investigated and compared the tree species composition and diversity of different forest types in Setiu Wetlands and on the three major islands of Terengganu. A total of 24 plots of 25 m × 25 m with four plots in each study site were established, viz. Melaleuca swamp forest in Kampung Fikri, freshwater swamp forest in Kampung Gong Batu, mangrove forest in UMT Setiu research station, and the islands, namely Pulau Bidong, Pulau Redang, and Pulau Perhentian. We calculated the basal area, stand density, Importance Value Index, species diversity, and above-ground biomass in the designated study areas. We assessed 139 tree species from 96 genera and 50 families based on a total of 2608 tree samples of 5 cm DBH and above. The freshwater swamp forest harbored the highest number of species with 20 species in Setiu Wetlands, and among the islands, Pulau Redang had the highest with 56 species. Melaleuca cajuputi was the most dominant species in the Melaleuca swamp forest, while Alstonia spatulata and Rhizophora apiculata are expected in the freshwater swamp and mangrove forest, respectively. Pulau Bidong, Pulau Redang, and Pulau Perhentian are mostly represented by Licania splendens, Shorea glauca, and Vatica sp., respectively. All the dominant species but Licania splendens contributed to the highest amount of above-ground biomass. Our current study indicated that different forest types vary in composition and structure, which may contribute to their unique ecological roles within their specific environment.

Keywords:

coastal and insular vegetation; protected areas; coastal wetland; freshwater swamp; mangrove; lowland dipterocarp forest

1. Introduction

The forest cover of Terengganu on the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia is still relatively extensive, with ca. 654,000 ha of forested areas [1]. Within these areas, 30,000 ha have been gazetted as a state park in Kenyir and ca. 1600 ha in Setiu Wetlands, including the freshwater wetland of Tasik Berombak [2,3]. National or state parks are thus far considered the best protected areas that do not allow logging or monoculture plantations. On the other hand, ca. 544,000 ha have been gazetted as Permanent Reserved Forests, which are still partly subjected to state forest management for timber production [1]. There are 45 forest reserves in Terengganu, consisting mainly of dipterocarp forests. Among these are Besul, Bukit Bauk, Bukit Kesing, Bukit Terendak, Cerul, Gunung Tebu, Hulu Besut, Hulu Telemong, Hulu Terengganu, Jengai, Jerangau, Merchang, Pasir Raja Barat and Selatan, Pelagat, Petuang, Rasau Kerteh, Sungai Nipah, and Tembat, each with above 5000 ha [1]. Furthermore, there are 13 marine parks in Terengganu with 36 sea turtle nesting grounds, the largest amount in Peninsular Malaysia [4]. Thus, Terengganu’s islands and the long coastline in Setiu Wetlands have been proposed as important marine ecological corridors: the Northern Terengganu Marine Park Islands-Setiu Wetlands Ecological Corridor of Peninsular Malaysia (Figure 1).

The Setiu Wetlands are a complex and heterogeneous landscape containing several different habitat types ranging from coastal forests to mangrove estuaries and freshwater swamps to hill dipterocarp forests [5,6]. Wetlands provide basic ecosystem regulatory services such as coastal protection [7,8], flood mitigation and erosion control [9,10], and nurseries for juvenile marine fishes and also support traditional livelihoods for the local population [6]. The wetlands are located northeast of Peninsular Malaysia in Terengganu and form part of the Setiu river basin. Much of the natural vegetation in Setiu Wetlands is still well-represented. These wetlands are considered the largest and possibly the most intact coastal wetland complex on the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia [2,6]. Due to their geographic isolation from the source population on the mainland, islands have long been known to support a set of unique populations, communities, and ecosystems. These resistance entities have adapted through a geographical limitation with vital processes, properties, and interactions that occur in a simpler way [11]. The forests in coastal areas bring about ecological and socio-economic importance in terms of goods and services (such as forestry and fisheries resources; recreation and ecotourism) [12].

Assessment and monitoring of forest biological diversity in coastal areas can provide insight into conservation value and are essential for sustainable forest management. According to Noss [13], the challenge lies in defining sound and practical biodiversity monitoring systems that deliver scientific data to inform sustainable forest management. The use of inventories to determine biodiversity (composition, diversity of tree species, and frequency) is a common way to gather information for forest management operations [14]. On the other hand, the different types of forest types occurring in Terengganu may act as carbon sources and carbon sinks. Biologically, estimates of above-ground biomass are essential for studies of carbon stocks and the effects of deforestation and carbon sequestration on the global carbon balance [15,16]. However, such data are lacking for coastal areas in Terengganu.

Currently, published data analyses of various forest types in Setiu Wetlands and major islands in Terengganu are still lacking. Although much research has been conducted independently to record plant species, e.g., [17,18,19], the forest structure and floristic composition are still unknown. Most of the available literature only focused on qualitative measures attempting to document the absence or presence of tree species but not the physical structures, such as quantitative measures of species diversity within a plot, the numbers of individuals within a species, and comparison among forest types in each species. Therefore, we aimed to investigate and compare the tree species composition, diversity, and above-ground biomass of three different forest types in Setiu Wetlands: Melaleuca swamp, freshwater swamp, and mangrove forests. Furthermore, three marine parks, namely Pulau Bidong, Pulau Perhentian, and Pulau Redang, were also included in the present study. We hypothesize that the tree species diversity in different habitats in Setiu Wetlands varies according to soil and environment factors and changes along the coastline towards the inland of Setiu.

2. Materials and Methods

The study sites are in Setiu Wetlands State Park and on three major islands of Terengganu, i.e., Pulau Bidong, Pulau Redang, and Pulau Perhentian (Figure 1). Three different forest types, i.e., Melaleuca swamp, freshwater swamp, and mangrove forests in Setiu Wetlands, were selected in the present study (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The islands of Terengganu are generally made up of lowland dipterocarp forests.

We used plot-based tree inventories to test the hypothesis. A total of 24 plots of 25 m × 25 m were established in all the study sites, with four plots in each of the six study sites. All trees with 5 cm diameter breast height (DBH) and above were surveyed, measured, and tagged with flagging ribbons. Trees were identified in-situ, while voucher specimens were collected for further identification and verification purposes. Specimens were deposited at the herbarium of Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMTP). Tree species were identified by E. Pesiu and M.R. Salam using the collection at UMTP and herbarium of Forest Research Institute Malaysia (KEP).

We calculated the basal area, stand density, Importance Value Index, species diversity, and above-ground biomass in the designated study areas. The sample-based rarefaction curve [20] was used to compare the species abundance in different forest types at each study site. The 95% confidence intervals were constructed where samples were drawn without replacement and calculated as ±2 standard deviations from the expected values [21]. Data was computed by using PAST Version 3.0 software [22]. Community composition within the plots was carried out with several abundance parameters such as basal area (m²/ha), stand density (Ind/ha) and Importance Value index (IV_i). The IV_i was calculated by summing the values of relative density (RD), relative dominance (based on basal area) (RB), and relative frequency (RF) of each species or family (IV_i = RD + RB + RF) [23]. Species diversity was determined using the Shannon Diversity Index (H′) [24] as follows:

s

H = ∑ − (Pi ∗ ln Pi)

i = 1

where s is the number of species; Pi is the proportion of individuals or the abundance of the ith species expressed as a proportion of total abundance. The estimation of above-ground biomass was calculated following Kato et al. [25]. The equation takes into account of the stem biomass (W_s), branches biomass (W_b) and leaves biomass (W_i). The above-ground biomass is estimated by adding up the value of stem, branches, and leaves biomass. The equations are as follows:

Stem biomass (W_s) = 0.313 (DBH² H)^0.9733

Branches biomass (W_b) = 0.136 W_s^1.041

Leaves biomass (W_i) = 125 × 0.124 W_s^0.794

0.124 W_s^0.794 + 125

where,

Tree height, H = (122 × DBH)

(2 DBH + 61)

Above-ground biomass (kg) = W_s + W_b+ W_i

3. Results

3.1. Species Richness and Diversity

We assessed 139 tree species from 96 genera and 50 families. This sampling was based on a total of 2608 tree samples of 5 cm DBH and above (Table 1 and Table 2). The detail of the tree species is shown in Table 2. In Setiu Wetlands, the freshwater swamp forest showed the highest number of species with 20 species compared to the Melaleuca swamp and mangrove forest with 13 species each. On the islands, Pulau Redang recorded the highest number of species with 56 species, followed by Pulau Bidong and Pulau Perhentian, with 55 and 20 species, respectively. In terms of density, freshwater swamp forest had the highest density and largest basal area with 1992 ind/ha and 17.38 m²/ha; among the islands, Pulau Bidong had the highest density with 2700 ind/ha and Pulau Redang had the largest basal area with 52.09 m²/ha (Table 1). The rarefaction curves differed significantly, and 95% confidence intervals did not overlap among the six study areas (Figures S1 and S2). All the curves are still in the exponential phase and are non-asymptotic with currently available sample sizes.

In Setiu Wetlands, the Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index (H′) shows that freshwater swamp has the highest tree diversity (Table 3). On the other hand, the diversity index on islands were slightly higher, of which Pulau Bidong recorded the highest with 3.22 (Table 3). As for species evenness, the forests indicated low evenness. Pulau Perhentian had the highest evenness with 0.68, while Pulau Bidong and Pulau Redang indicated moderate evenness.

Regarding DBH size classification, the study areas in Setiu Wetlands showed a low number of diameter class distributions with only 2–3 main diameter classes (Figure 4). Most of the trees within the plot were small to medium in size, and the majority were in the 5–14.99 cm DBH class, followed by 15–24.9 cm, and only a few in the 25–34.9 cm. In the Melaleuca swamp forest, Melaleuca cajuputi from the family Myrtaceae dominated the forest plot, while in the mangrove and freshwater swamp, Rhizophora apiculata (Rhizophoraceae) and Alstonia spatulata (Apocynaceae) recorded the highest, respectively.

The other families were scattered, such as Aquifoliaceae, Malvaceae, Sapotaceae, Pittosporaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Verbenaceae, Anacardiaceae, and Fabaceae. Myrtaceae had the largest basal area, particularly in the Melaleuca swamp, followed by the Aquifoliaceae, Sapotaceae, and Malvaceae. The abundance of the family Rhizophoraceae with the most dominant species, Rhizophora apiculata, formed the major structure of the mangrove forest with a total basal area of 7.08 m² ha⁻¹. In the freshwater swamp, the family Apocynaceae (Alstonia spatulata) recorded the largest basal area with a total of 9.77 m² ha⁻¹.

From the islands, the study areas demonstrated more DBH classes of at least 4–6 classes of diameter distributions (Figure 4). Most of the trees within the plot were small to medium in size, and the majority were in the 5–14.99 cm DBH class, followed by 15–24.9 cm and 25–34.9 cm. In Pulau Bidong and Pulau Perhentian, the family Myrtaceae and genus Syzygium showed the highest number of individuals in diameter class distribution. However, the species varies accordingly based on the diameter size. In Pulau Bidong, Licania splendens tends to be abundant at small sizes within the forest, while Lithocarpus rassa and Syzygium cinereum were found growing in medium to bigger sizes. In Pulau Perhentian, Vatica sp. was dominant in small and larger diameter sizes, while Palaquium obovatum and Buchanania arborescens were in more medium to large sizes. In Pulau Redang, Diospyros pilosanthera from the family Ebenaceae recorded the highest at 5–14.99 diameter. Meanwhile, Madhuca sericea from the family Sapotaceae was dominant at 15–24.99 diameter class. For the diameter class of 25 cm DBH and above, Shorea glauca from the family Dipterocarpaceae recorded the highest.

In terms of density, the family Myrtaceae showed the highest in Pulau Bidong and Pulau Perhentian, with 572 individual/ha and 444 individual/ha, respectively. The family Dipterocarpaceae was the second highest and thrived well on all three islands. Each site had 384 ind/ha, 172 ind/ha, and 280 ind/ha in Pulau Bidong, Pulau Redang, and Pulau Perhentian, respectively. Furthermore, in the basal area, the family Dipterocarpaceae showed the highest in Pulau Redang with 35.49 m²/ha, and Myrtaceae in Pulau Perhentian with 9.58 m²/ha and Pulau Bidong with 7.09 m²/ha. Shorea glauca from the family Dipterocarpaceae in Pulau Redang showed the largest basal area with 35.28 m²/ha while Vatica sp. in Pulau Perhentian and Syzygium cinereum in Pulau Bidong, each with 5.04 m²/ha and 2.68 m²/ha respectively.

3.2. Importance Value Index

In the Melaleuca swamp forest, Melaleuca cajuputi had the highest importance value (IV_i = 112.52) (Table 4). The other dominant species within the same forest type includes Ilex cymosa (IV_i = 62.72), Talipariti tiliaceus (IV_i = 23.18), and Pouteria obovata (IV_i = 19.09). For the mangrove forest, the most dominant species were the Rhizophora apiculata (IV_i = 173.67), followed by Excoecaria agallocha (IV_i = 22.60), Pouteria obovata (IV_i = 20.84), Talipariti tiliaceus (IV_i = 15.20), Intsia bijuga (IV_i = 14.97), and Heritiera littoralis (IV_i = 18.82). The least dominant species was Dolichandrone spathaceae with IV_i of 3.75. The most dominant species in freshwater swamp forest was Alstonia spatulata with IV_i of 105.96. The other dominant species were Gynotroches axillaris (IV_i = 49.99), Macaranga hypoleuca (IV_i = 33.91), Vitex trifolia (IV_i = 17.40), and Campnosperma coriaceum (IV_i = 13.49).

In Pulau Bidong, Licania splendens was the most dominant species within the plot, having the highest importance value (IV_i = 26.64). The least dominant species were Timonius wallichianus, Memecylon sp., Diplospora malaccensis, and Garcinia eugenifolia with IV_i of 0.98. The most dominant species in Pulau Redang was Shorea glauca (IV_i = 87.85), followed by Madhuca sericea (IV_i = 21.25), Diospyros pilosanthera (IV_i = 14.42), Diospyros sp. 1 (IV_i = 14.28), and Litsea sp. (IV_i = 12.81). Meanwhile, the least dominant species were Mangifera odorata, Cleistanthus sp. 1, Diospyros sp. 2, Suregada multiflora, Madhuca tubulosa, Dracaena maingayi, Memecylon sp., Ormosia sumatrana, and Syzygium zeylanicum with IV_i of 1.51. In Pulau Perhentian, the most dominant species was Vatica sp. (IV_i = 46.18), and the co-dominant species were Syzygium cerina (IV_i = 36.86) and Buchanania arborescens (IV_i = 31.69) (Table 4).

3.3. Above-Ground Biomass Estimation

The family Myrtaceae in Pulau Bidong and Pulau Perhentian recorded the highest above-ground biomass with a total of 67.07 t/ha and 100.32 t/ha, respectively, contributing to 30.95% and 41.11%. Meanwhile, in Pulau Redang, the family Dipterocarpaceae was the highest, with a total of 534.35 t/ha (73.40%). In Pulau Bidong, Syzygium cinereum contributed the most with a total of 26.49 t/ha (11.99%), while the Shorea glauca was the highest in Pulau Redang, 532.37 t/ha (73.10%). In Pulau Perhentian, Vatica sp. contributed the most, with an estimated total above-ground biomass of 49.71 t/ha (20.36%).

The total amount of above-ground biomass concerning the family differs according to each study site that follows the types of forest formation and vegetation. The family Myrtaceae was the highest for the Melaleuca swamp forest with 84.88 t/ha (65.01%) (Table 5). Meanwhile, in the mangrove forest, the family Rhizophoraceae contributed 55.70 t/ha (80.18%). The family Apocynaceae were the highest in the freshwater swamp forest with 87.40 t/ha or 58.06% of the total above-ground biomass. Generally, the families Myrtaceae and Dipterocarpaceae usually contributed a high amount of above-ground biomass in islands. In Pulau Bidong and Pulau Perhentian, the Myrtaceae was the highest, with a total amount of 67.07 t/ha and 100.32 t/ha contributing to 30.95% and 41.11% of the total above-ground biomass. Meanwhile, the family Dipterocarpaceae was the highest in Pulau Redang, with a total of 534.35 t/ha (73.40%).

The list of the five species that contributed to the highest amount of above-ground biomass is shown in Table 5. In Setiu Wetlands, Melaleuca cajuputi, Rhizophora apiculata, and Alstonia spatulata showed the highest amount of total above-ground biomass, with each contributing 84.88 t/ha (64.83%), 55.70 t/ha (80.17%) and 87.27 t/ha (58.97%) due to their abundance and dominant in each forest types formation. In Pulau Bidong, Syzygium cinereum contributed the most, comprising 26.49 t/ha (11.99%). Shorea glauca was the highest in Pulau Redang, with 532.27 t/ha (73.10%). In Pulau Perhentian, Vatica sp. contributed the most with an estimated total above-ground biomass of 49.71 t/ha (20.36%).

4. Discussion

Generally, the distribution of plants and vegetation in Malaysia is influenced by the climate, soil, and soil water [26], as well as habitat. Our study shows that the diversity of tree species in the lowland dipterocarp forests in the three major islands of Terengganu was higher than that of the edaphic forest types in Setiu Wetlands. The Melaleuca swamp, freshwater swamp and mangrove forests are among the various edaphic vegetation formations found in Malaysia, in which species composition is greatly influenced by adaptation to soil conditions [27]. Setiu Wetlands shows disparities in vegetation types, tree abundance, and diversity due to different BRIS soil characteristics and series that may explain the plant distribution. The BRIS soil is classified into two orders, namely entisol and spodosol; the former can be described as young and sandy soil, which is found in areas close to the sea while the latter is acidic soil combined with a mor-humus (acidic humus), which can be found more to the inland areas [28]. Several studies have been carried out on the physical characteristics of BRIS soil in the coastal area of Terengganu, which further characterized the soil order into four series: Baging, Rhu Tapai, Rudua, and Jambu [29,30]. These soil series are generally lacking in selected mineral nutrients, have low water retention capacity and are poorly structured, that limit the ability of plants to grow [22,23,29,30]. Therefore, only certain locally adaptable plants with specific soil tolerance can survive and live within these sites [3,6].

The tree density, basal area and H’ value recorded in mangrove forest for this study was slightly lower but within a similar range when compared to the other regional studies, e.g., Ayer Hangat Forest Reserve, Matang Forest Reserve, Tok Bali Forest Reserve, and Kisap Forest Reserve in Peninsular Malaysia [31,32,33,34], Bahile Mangrove Forest, the Philippines [35] and in Trang Province, Southern Thailand [36] (Table S1). Our study indicated that the mangrove forest around the area was subjected to higher disturbance and experiencing low regeneration, as inferred from the low tree density and small basal area. Various studies have reported that mangrove forests are threatened by land use changes worldwide, e.g., [37,38,39]. In Setiu Wetlands, mangrove forests are subjected to anthropogenic disturbances such as land reclamation for development, deforestation mainly for charcoal and firewood and aquaculture activities such as shrimp farming and fish ponds [3]. These observations highlighted the urgent need for effective conservation management in the Setiu Wetlands. According to Ashton et al. [40], mangroves can regenerate productively and sustainably when given conducive conditions for stock trees to produce propagules or seeds. Meanwhile, onsite protection by law and continuous monitoring revealed higher mangrove tree regeneration survival after disturbances at another Malaysian mangrove site [34]. In terms of species diversity, the low H’ value was expected due to the lack of species variation within the mangrove stands. Various comparative studies also concluded that mangrove forests had lower diversity because of their unique abiotic adaptive requirements and stand formation compared to the other tropical terrestrial forest ecosystems [32,34,41].

The freshwater swamp forest types are generally less studied in Southeast Asia when compared to mangroves [36,42,43]. A study in the freshwater swamp forest of Otuwe, Nigeria demonstrated similar findings where the H’ value ranged from 0.98 to 2.13 [44]; this study recorded the H’ value of 1.85. The tree density and basal area recorded for this study are slightly lower when compared to Igu [44]. This was attributed to the low tree diameter class distribution as most of the Setiu freshwater swamp trees belonged to the small-to-medium diameter class distribution, while Igu [44] recorded more trees with large diameter sizes. The species important value (IV_i) shows that swamp forests are usually dominated by a few tree species [45], which agrees with the results of other studies, e.g., [32,35,36,44,46].

Our study found that most of the trees enumerated in Setiu Wetlands were in 6–25 cm DBH, and large trees greater than 25 cm DBH were rarely seen. Similarly, on the dune landscape in Jambu Bongkok, Terengganu, 433 out of 451 individuals were in the lowest diameter class of 5–15 cm DBH [18]. Poor nutrient soil properties significantly affect tree growth and diameter and may have contributed to fewer trees with large diameters greater than 25 cm [47]. On the other hand, among all the study sites, only in Pulau Redang and Pulau Perhentian, trees were seen in more than 45 cm DBH and above, e.g., Shorea glauca from the family Dipterocarpaceae. While in Pulau Bidong, none of the Dipterocarpaceae family was found, due partly to the impact of Vietnamese refugees that settled on the island in the 1980s and harvested most of the trees for building materials [48]. The highest numbers of trees recorded in the islands were below 24.9 cm DBH, indicating one of the characteristics of dipterocarp forest [49,50]. The distribution pattern resembled the inverted ‘J’ that represents the decrease in the number of individuals as the DBH of trees increases. The finding suggests that the forests are in regenerating phase due to the abundance of the understory layer [51]. Similar tree distribution is also observed in previous studies, e.g., the primary lowland dipterocarp forest in Pasoh Forest Reserve, Negeri Sembilan [52], and the lowland dipterocarp forest in Bukit Belata, Selangor [53].

Our study shows that the stem density varies according to the forest types (Table 1) and corroborates previous studies carried out in Malaysia, with a range of 800–2200 Ind/ha. For example, a total of 796 Ind/ha were recorded in the swamp forest in Sugut Forest Reserve, Sabah, 1113 Ind/ha in Tanjung Tuan Forest Reserve, Negeri Sembilan, 1576 Ind/ha in Timun Island, Pulau Langkawi, 1670 Ind/ha in the coastal forest of Terengganu, 1840 Ind/ha in Pulau Singa Besar, Pulau Langkawi, and 2200 Ind/ha in the inland forest of Pulau Redang [12,54,55]. Overall, the total basal area recorded in the three islands from 24–52 m²/ha is consistent with data obtained in other studies focusing on the lowland dipterocarp forest. Generally, the total basal area is within the range of 28–52 m²/ha [56], e.g., Nizam et al. [57] reported a total basal area of two forest plots established in Kenong Forest Park were 26.91 m²/ha and 29.23 m²/ha. Moreover, the lowland dipterocarp forest harbors a higher amount of above-ground biomass than the other forest types. Similar studies reported a range of 107.5–955.61 t/ha for total above-ground biomass [12,15,16,25,55,58,59,60].

Towards this point, our studies successfully assessed the forest stand structure and evaluated the level of species composition, distribution and diversity within the covered area. However, long-term monitoring of the forests may be initiated to understand more of the forest dynamics that attempt to relate present community patterns to past events and predict the outcomes of future ones concerning suitable environmental parameters such as climate and soil properties. The study’s findings are much needed to enhance management practices, concurrently conserve forest resources, and guide and inform forest management activities and assessment. Furthermore, this information may contribute to the conservation, biodiversity assessment, and sustainable forest management strategies for Setiu Wetlands and islands of Terengganu.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy12102380/s1, Figure S1: Sample-based rarefaction curve for Melaleuca swamp forest, freshwater swamp forest and mangrove forest in Setiu Wetlands. Figure S2: Sample-based rarefaction curve for Pulau Redang, Pulau Perhentian, and Pulau Bidong. Table S1: Stem density, basal area, and diversity in mangrove forest for this study compared with other studies in Southeast Asia.

Author Contributions

Planning and designing of the research and draft of the manuscript: E.P., M.R.S. and G.E.L.; fieldwork and data curation: E.P. and M.R.S.; identification and statistical analyses: E.P. and M.R.S.; data analyses: E.P. and G.E.L.; funding acquisition: M.T.A.; writing—original draft: E.P. and G.E.L.; writing—review and editing: M.R.S., J.M.S., K.H.L., J.W.H.Y. and M.T.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Trans-disciplinary Research Grant Scheme (TRGS, 2015/59373), Niche Research Grant Scheme (NRGS/2015/5313/2), Geran Galakan Penyelidikan (GGP/68007/2014/127), and Dana Pembangunan Geopark Kenyir (GEOPARK/2015/53167/3) led by M.T. Abdullah and colleagues. The APC was funded by the Research Management and Innovation Centre (RMIC), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Universiti Malaysia Terengganu for the permission and administrative and logistic support in conducting this study since 2015, the Forestry Department of Peninsular Malaysia, and the Setiu District Office. The second author is grateful to Jarina Mohd Jani for her insightful discussion on the local ecological knowledge about sustainable harvesting in Setiu Wetlands.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Terengganu State Foresty Department. Available online: http://trgforestry.terengganu.gov.my (accessed on 3 August 2022).
Jarina, M.J.; Rohani, S.; Wan Saefullah, W.N.; Sathiamurthy, E.; Lee, G.E.; Jamilah, M.S.; Aqilah, M.; Nur Omaima, H.; Nor Zalipah, M.; Wan Bayani, W.A.; et al. Setiu Wetlands. In A Celebration of Nature and Culture; Majlis Pengurusan Taman Negeri Terengganu: Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, 2021; pp. 1–108. [Google Scholar]
Jamilah, M.S.; Siti Mariam, M.N.; Lee, G.E.; Razali, M.S.; Salwa, S.; Pesiu, E.; Chong, J.L.; Jarina, M.J.; Horsali, N.A.I.; Faridah, M.; et al. A checklist of vascular plants and its uses for livelihood-making in Setiu Wetlands, Terengganu, Malaysia. Phytokeys 2020, 160, 7–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Asean Centre for Biodiversity: Sixth National Report of Malaysia. Available online: https://asean.chm-cbd.net/documents/sixth-national-report-malaysia (accessed on 3 August 2022).
Tamblyn, A.; Turner, C.; Rainess, P. Malaysia Tropical Forest Conservation Project Report of the Setiu Wetlands Phase; Coral Cay Conservation: London, UK, 2006; pp. 1–89. [Google Scholar]
Faridah, M.; Jamilah, M.S.; Jarina, M.J.; Rohani, S. Setiu Wetlands: Species, Eosystems and Livelihood; Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Terengganu: Kuala Nerus, Malaysia, 2015; pp. 1–228. [Google Scholar]
Gedan, L.B.; Kirwan, M.L.; Wolanski, E.; Barbier, E.B.; Silliman, B.R. The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Clim. Change 2011, 106, 7–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Temmerman, S.; Meire, P.; Bouma, T.J.; Herman, P.M.J.; Ysebaert, T.; De Vriend, H.J. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature 2013, 504, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
De Groot, R.S.; Wilson, M.A.; Boumans, R.M.J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Acremen, M.; Holden, J. How wetlands affect floods. Wetlands 2013, 33, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Vitousek, P.M.; Loope, L.L.; Adsersen, H.; D’ Antonio, C.M. Island ecosystems: Do they represent natural experiments in biological diversity and ecosystems functions. In Functional Role of Biodiversity: A Global Perspective; Mooney, H.A., Cushman, J.H., Medina, E., Sala, O.E., Schulze, E.D., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 1996; pp. 245–259. [Google Scholar]
Khairil, M.; Nashriyah, M.; Norhayati, N.; Shahril, A.; Fatihah, N. Tree species composition, diversity and above ground biomass of two forest types at Redang Island, Peninsular Malaysia. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10, 77–90. [Google Scholar]
Noss, R.F. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators. For. Ecol. Manag. 1999, 115, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Suratman, M.N. Tree species diversity and forest stand structure of Pahang National Park, Malaysia. In Biodiversity Enrichment in a Diverse World; Lameed, G.A., Ed.; Intech Open: London, UK, 2012; pp. 473–492. [Google Scholar]
Kueh, J.H.R.; Lim, M.T. An estimate of forest biomass in Ayer Hitam forest reserve. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 1999, 22, 117–122. [Google Scholar]
Hikmat, A. Biomass estimation, carbon storage and energy content of three virgin jungle reserves in Peninsular Malaysia. Media Konserv. 2005, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Jamilah, M.S.; Nur-Faiezah, A.G.; Siti Kehirah, A.; Siti Mariam, M.N.; Razali, M.S. Woody plants on dune landscape of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2014, 26, 267–274. [Google Scholar]
Razali, M.S.; Muhammad Khairul, F.Z.; Wan Juliana, W.A. Distribution and rarity of mangrove and coastal plants in developing indicators of hotspots in Setiu Wetlands. In Prosiding Seminar Ekspedisi Saintifik Tanah Bencah Setiu; Abdullah, D.M., Nasir, M.Z., Mohd Mazlan, N., Wan Faridah, A.W.K., Eds.; WWF Malaysia: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, 2017; pp. 55–66. [Google Scholar]
Pesiu, E.; Abdullah, M.T.; Jamilah, M.S.; Razali, M.S. Tree species composition in Pulau Bidong and Pulau Redang. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2016, 1, 48–60. [Google Scholar]
Gotelli, N.J.; Colwell, R.K. Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Devries, P.J.; Alexander, L.G.; Chacon, I.A.; Fordyce, J.A. Similarity and differences among rainforest fruit-feeding butterfly communities in Central and South America. J. Anim. Ecol. 2012, 81, 472–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hammer, O.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological statistics of software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 9. [Google Scholar]
Brower, J.E.; Zar, J.H.; Von Ende, C. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology, 4th ed.; WCB McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 1–176. [Google Scholar]
Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Champaign, IL, USA; Urbana, IL, USA, 1949; pp. 1–296. [Google Scholar]
Kato, R.; Tadaki, Y.; Ogawa, H. Plant biomass and growth increment studies in Pasoh Forest. Malay. Nat. J. 1978, 30, 21–122. [Google Scholar]
Wyatt-Smith, J. Manual of Malayan Silviculture for Inland Forest. Malayan Forest Records No. 23; Forest Research Institute Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1963; Volume 1, pp. 1–465. [Google Scholar]
Saw, L.G. Vegetation of Peninsular Malaysia. In Flora of Peninsular Malaysia. Series II: Seed Plants; Kiew, R., Chung, R.C.K., Saw, L.G., Soepadmo, E., Eds.; Forest Research Institute Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1963; pp. 21–45. [Google Scholar]
Roslan, I.; Shamshuddin, J.; Fauziah, C.I.; Anuar, A.R. Fertility and suitability of the Spodosols formed on sandy beach ridges interspersed with swales in the Kelantan-Terengganu plains of Malaysia for Kenaf production. Malays. J. Soil Sci. 2011, 15, 472–482. [Google Scholar]
Mohd Ekhwan, T.; Mazlin, M.; Muhammad Barzani, G.; Nor Azlina, A.A. Analysis of the physical characteristics of BRIS soil in coastal Kuala Kemaman, Terengganu. Earth Sci. Res. J. 2009, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
Usman, M.I.; Umara, B.; Edi Armantho, H.M.; Adzemi, M.A. Assessment and evaluation of BRIS soil and its implication on maize crop in Merang, Terengganu, Region of Malaysia. J. Biol. Agr. Health. 2014, 4, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
Muktar, A.; Awang Noor, A.G.; Nobilly, F.; Alerk, R.J. Stand structure and species composition of mangrove forests in Kuala Trong range, Matang, Perak. In A Sustainable Management of Matang Mangroves: 100 Years and Beyond; Shaharuddin, M.I., Azahar, M., Rozani, U., Kamaruzaman, A.B., Lim, K.I., Suhaili, R., Jalil, M.S., Latiff, A., Eds.; Forest Department of Peninsular Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2005; pp. 253–262. [Google Scholar]
Norhayati, A.; Nizam, M.S.; Wan Juliana, W.A.; Shukor, M.N.; Fera Fizani, A.F.; Hafizah, S.; Sariah, H.; Jamaliah, J.; Intan Nordira, A.K.; Latiff, A. Comparison of mangrove tree species composition at selected location in Peninsular Malaysia. In A Sustainable Management of Matang Mangroves: 100 Years and Beyond; Shaharuddin, M.I., Azahar, M., Rozani, U., Kamaruzaman, A.B., Lim, K.I., Suhaili, R., Jalil, M.S., Latiff, A., Eds.; Forest Department of Peninsular Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2005; pp. 263–272. [Google Scholar]
Kasawani, I.; Kamaruzaman, J.; Nurul-Nadhirah, M.I. Biological diversity assessment of Tok Bali Mangrove Forest, Kelantan, Malaysia. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 2007, 2, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
Wan Norilani, W.I.; Wan Juliana, W.A.; Razali, M.S.; Latiff, A. Structural and floristic pattern in a disturbed mangrove tropical swamp forest: A case study from the Langkawi UNESCO Global Geopark Forest, Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malays. 2018, 47, 861–869. [Google Scholar]
Abino, A.C.; Castillo, J.A.A.; Lee, Y.J. Assessment of species diversity, biomass and carbon sequestration potential of a natural mangrove stand in Samar, the Philippines. Forest Sci. Technol. 2014, 10, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sudtongkong, C.; Webb, E.L. Outcomes of state versus community-based mangrove management in Southern Thailand. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13, 27–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Valiela, I.; Bowen, J.L.; York, J.K. Mangrove forests: One of the world’s threatened major tropical environments. J. Bio. Sci. 2001, 51, 807–815. [Google Scholar]
Alongi, D.M. Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ. Conserv. 2002, 29, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Polidoro, B.A.; Carpenter, K.E.; Collins, L.; Duke, N.C.; Ellison, A.M.; Ellison, J.C.; Farnsworth, E.J.; Fernando, E.S.; Kathiresan, K.; Koedem, N.E.; et al. The loss of species: Mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ashton, E.C.; Macintosh, D.J. Preliminary assessment of the plant diversity and community ecology of Sematan mangrove forest, Sarawak, Malaysia. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 166, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lu, C.Y.; Wong, Y.S.; Tam, N.F.Y.; Berry, R. Vegetation analysis of a typical mangrove swamp- Lai Chi Wo coast of Hong Kong. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 1998, 16, 72–77. [Google Scholar]
Yamada, I. Tropical Rainforest of Southeast Asia—A Forest Ecologist’s View; University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1997; pp. 1–440. [Google Scholar]
Dudgeon, D. Riverine biodiversity in Asia—A challenge for conservation biology. Hydrobiologia 2000, 418, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Igu, N.I. Species diversity and structure of an intact freshwater swamp forest in the Niger Delta. Open. J. For. 2017, 7, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Corlett, R.T. The Ecology of Tropical East Asia; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 1–333. [Google Scholar]
Rozainah, M.Z.; Mohamad, M.R. Mangrove forest species composition and density in Balok River, Pahang, Malaysia. Ecoprint 2006, 13, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Richards, P.W. The Tropical Rain Forests; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vu, Q.G.N. Journey of the abandoned: Endless refugees’ camp and incurable traumas. Signs 2007, 32, 580–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Whitmore, T.C.; Burnham, C.P. Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
Wan Norilani, W.I.; Wan Juliana, W.A.; Latiff, A. Floristic composition, stand structure, above ground biomass and conservation value of a coastal lowland forest at Bukit Bauk Urban Forest, Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia. Malays. For. 2013, 76, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
Newberry, D.M.; Campbell, E.J.F.; Lee, Y.F.; Ridsdale, C.E.; Still, M.J. Primary lowland dipterocarp forest at Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia: Structure, relative abundance and family composition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1992, 335, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Appanah, S.; Weinland, G. Research Pamphlet No. 112. In A Preliminary Analysis of the 50-Hectare Pasoh Demography Plot: I. Dipterocarpaceae; Forest Research Institute of Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1993. [Google Scholar]
Nizam, M.S.; Nur Maisarah, J.; Jildred, J.; Wan, J.W.A. Komposisi, Kepelbagaian Dan Biojisim Komuniti Pokok Di Hutan Simpan Bukit Belata; Azahar, M., Koh, H.L., Mohd Shah, N.M.N., Samsul, A.N., Latiff, A., Eds.; Forest Department of Peninsular Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Nilus, R.; Ong, R.C. Floristic composition of the Perupok Swamp Forest of the Sugut Forest Reserve, Sabah. Mal. Nat. J. 2001, 55, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
Mat-Salleh, K.; Tami, R.; Latiff, A. Ecology and conservation value of Tanjung Tuan, the Myrtaceae-dominant coastal forest reserve of Malaysia. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2003, 15, 59–73. [Google Scholar]
Swaine, M.D.; Lieberman, D.; Putz, F.E. The dynamics of tree populations in tropical forest: A review. J. Trop. Ecol. 1987, 3, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nizam, M.S.; Rohani, S.; Wan Juliana, W.A. Floristic variation of tree communities in two distinct habitats within a forest park in Pahang, Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malay. 2012, 41, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
Soepadmo, E. Structure, aboveground biomass and floristic composition at Gunung Janin Barat, Ulu Endau, Johore, Malaysia. Mal. Nat. J. 1987, 41, 275–290. [Google Scholar]
Lajuni, J.J.; Latiff, A. Biomass and floristic composition of Bangi Permanent Forest Reserve, a twice-logged lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malay. 2013, 42, 1517–1521. [Google Scholar]
Syuharni, A.; Hakeem, K.; FaridahHanum, I.; Ozturk, M. Ecology of the coastal heath forest flora—A case study from Terengganu, Malaysia. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2014, 26, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Figure 1. Map showing the Setiu Wetlands and islands of Terengganu. Red stars and bold red texts indicate the location of the study areas. Red star 1: mangrove in UMT research station, 2: freshwater swamp in Gong Batu, 3: Melaleuca swamp in Kampung Fikri. The dotted blue line is the proposed Northern Terengganu Marine Park Islands-Setiu Wetlands Ecological Corridor. Map modified from the 6th National Report of Malaysia to the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Figure 2. Different habitats at the study areas. (A,B) Setiu River, one of the four main rivers in Setiu Wetlands; (C) freshwater swamp forest; (D) mangrove forest; (E) Melaleuca swamp forest, (F) lowland dipterocarp forest in Pulau Redang.

Figure 3. Some of the plants found in the study areas. (A) Top canopy of Melaleuca cajuputi; (B) leaves and inflorescence of Melaleuca cajuputi; (C) top canopy of Rhizophora apiculata; (D) leaves and propagules of Rhizophora apiculata; (E) bark of Vatica sp. (inset top: white resin, bottom: leaf arrangement); (F) habitat of Talipariti tiliaceus (inset top: fruit, bottom: flower).

Figure 4. Diameter class distribution. (a) The Melaleuca swamp, freshwater swamp and mangrove forests in Setiu Wetlands; (b) the three major islands of Terengganu, Pulau Bidong, Pulau Redang, and Pulau Perhentian.

Table 1. Comparison of basic tree inventory metrics and the total above-ground biomass in each study site.

	Setiu Wetlands			Islands
	Melaleuca Swamp	Freshwater Swamp	Mangrove	Pulau Bidong	Pulau Redang	Pulau Perhentian
Number of families	13	17	10	28	27	13
Number of genera	14	20	13	43	42	14
Number of species	13	20	13	55	56	20
Stem density (trees DBH ≥ 5 cm DBH, trees/ha)	1432	1992	1208	2700	1088	1500
Basal area of trees (m²/ha)	15.22	17.38	8.84	25.04	52.09	24.64
Total above-ground biomass (t/ha)	130.92	147.98	69.47	216.73	728.04	244.05

Table 2. Species list based on plot-based tree inventories. MS = Melaleuca swamp, FS = freshwater swamp, M = mangrove in Setiu Wetlands; PB = Pulau Bidong, PR = Pulau Redang, PP = Pulau Perhentian.

Family	Species	MS	FS	M	PB	PR	PP
Anacardiaceae	Bouea oppositifolia	−	−	−	+	+	−
	Bouea sp.	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Buchanania arborescens	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Campnosperma coriaceum	−	+	−	−	−	−
	Dracontomelon dao	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Mangifera macrocarpa	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Mangifera odorata	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Parishia insignis	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Swintonia floribunda	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Swintonia schwenkii	−	−	−	+	−	−
Annonaceae	Goniothalamus tenuifolius	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Polyalthia sumatrana	−	−	−	−	+	−
Apocynaceae	Alstonia spatulata	−	+	−	−	−	−
Aquifoliaceae	Ilex cymosa	+	+	+	−	−	−
Asparagaceae	Dracaena maingayi	−	−	−	−	+	−
Bignoniaceae	Dolichandrone spathacea	−	−	+	−	−	−
Burseraceae	Dacryodes rostrata	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Santiria rubiginosa	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Santiria sp.	−	−	−	+	−	−
Calophyllaceae	Calophyllum rupicola	−	−	−	+	−	+
	Mesua ferrea	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Mesua lepidota	−	−	−	+	+	−
Cannabaceae	Gironniera sp.	−	−	−	+	−	−
Celastraceae	Euonymus cochinchinensis	−	−	−	−	−	−
	Kokoona sessilis	−	−	−	−	+	−
Chrysobalanaceae	Licania splendens	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Maranthes corymbosa	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Maranthes sp.	−	−	−	+	−	−
Clusiaceae	Garcinia eugenifolia	−	+	−	+	−	−
	Garcinia hombroniana	+	+	−	+	−	−
	Garcinia nigrolineata	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Garcinia sp.	−	−	−	−	+	−
Dipterocarpaceae	Dipterocarpus chartaceus	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Shorea glauca	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Shorea materialis	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Vatica sp.	−	−	−	+	+	+
Ebenaceae	Diospyros pilosanthera	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Diospyros sp. 1	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Diospyros sp. 2	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Diospyros sp. 3	−	−	−	−	+	−
Elaeocarpaceae	Elaeocarpus macrocerus	+	+	−	−	−	−
	Elaeocarpus mastersii	−	−	−	−	−	−
	Elaeocarpus sp.	−	−	−	−	−	+
Erythroxylaceae	Erythroxylum cuneatum	−	−	−	+	−	−
Euphorbiaceae	Croton oblongus	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Drypetes sp.	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Excoecaria agallocha	−	−	+	−	−	−
	Koilodepas sp.	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Macaranga hypoleuca	−	+	−	−	−	−
	Suregada multiflora	+	+	−	−	+	−
Fabaceae	Acacia mangium	−	−	+	−	−	−
	Archidendron contortum	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Callerya atropurpurea	−	−	−	−	−	−
	Intsia bijuga	−	−	+	−	−	−
	Ormosia sumatrana	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Sindora cochinchinensis	−	−	−	−	−	−
	Lithocarpus rassa	−	−	−	+	−	+
Flacourtiaceae	Hydnocarpus sp.	−	−	−	−	+	−
Hypericaceae	Cratoxylum arborescens	−	+	−	−	−	−
	Cratoxylum formosum	−	−	−	−	−	+
Lamiaceae	Teijsmanniodendron coriaceum	−	−	−	+	+	−
Lauraceae	Cinnamomum sintoc	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Litsea sp.	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Neolitsea zeylanica	+	+	−	−	−	−
Lecythidaceae	Barringtonia macrostachya	−	−	−	−	−	−
	Barringtonia scortechinii	−	−	−	−	+	−
Loganiaceae	Norrisia malaccensis	−	−	−	+	−	−
Malvaceae	Heritiera littoralis	−	−	+	−	−	−
	Heritiera simplicifolia	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Heritiera sp. 1	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Heritiera sp. 2	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Talipariti tiliaceus	+	+	+	−	−	−
Melastomataceae	Memecylon edule	+	−	−	−	−	−
	Memecylon sp.	−	−	−	+	+	−
Meliaceae	Sandoricum koetjape	−	−	−	−	−	−
	Xylocarpus rumphii	−	−	+	−	−	−
Moraceae	Artocarpus kemando	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Artocarpus lanceifolius	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Artocarpus scortechinii	−	−	−	−	−	−
	Ficus sp.	−	+	−	−	−	−
	Streblus taxoides	+	−	−	−	−	−
Myricaceae	Myrica esculenta	+	+	−	−	−	−
Myristicaceae	Knema glauca	−	−	−	+	+	−
	Knema globularia	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Knema laurina	−	−	−	+	−	−
Myrtaceae	Melaleuca cajuputi	+	+	−	−	−	−
	Rhodamnia cinerea	−	−	−	+	−	+
	Syzygium cerinum	−	−	−	+	−	+
	Syzygium cinereum	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Syzygium grande	−	−	−	+	+	−
	Syzygium sp. 1	−	−	−	+	+	+
	Syzygium sp. 2	−	−	−	+	−	+
	Syzygium sp. 3	−	−	−	+	−	+
	Syzygium sp. 4	−	−	−	+	−	+
	Syzygium sp. 5	−	−	−	−	−	+
	Syzygium sp. 6	−	−	−	−	−	+
	Syzygium syzygioides	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Syzygium zeylanicum	−	+	−	+	+	−
Ochnaceae	Brackenridgea hookeri	−	+	−	+	−	−
	Campylospermum serratum	−	−	−	+	−	−
Pentaphylacaceae	Adinandra dumosa	−	−	−	−	−	−
Peraceae	Chaetocarpus castanocarpus	−	−	−	+	−	+
Phyllanthaceae	Baccaurea parviflora	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Cleistanthus sp. 1	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Cleistanthus sp. 2	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Cleistanthus sumatranus	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Glochidion sp.	−	−	+	−	−	−
Picrodendraceae	Austrobuxus nitidus	−	−	−	+	−	−
Pittosporaceae	Pittosporum ferrugineum	+	+	−	−	−	−
Polygalaceae	Xanthophyllum sp.	−	−	−	+	−	−
Primulaceae	Rapanea porteriana	−	−	−	−	−	+
Rhizophoraceae	Bruguiera gymnorrhiza	−	−	+	−	−	−
	Gynotroches axillaris	−	+	−	−	−	−
	Rhizophora apiculata	−	−	+	−	−	−
Rubiaceae	Aidia wallichiana	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Canthium glabrum	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Canthium nitidum	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Canthium sp.	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Diplospora malaccensis	−	−	−	+	+	−
	Ixora pendula	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Morinda elliptica	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Psydrax sp.	−	−	−	+	−	+
	Timonius wallichianus	−	−	−	+	−	−
Rutaceae	Acronychia pedunculata	−	−	−	+	+	−
	Atalantia monophylla	−	−	−	−	+	−
Sapindaceae	Guioa bijuga	−	−	+	+	−	+
	Nephelium sp.	−	−	−	−	−	−
Sapotaceae	Madhuca longifolia	−	−	−	+	−	−
	Madhuca sericea	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Madhuca tubulosa	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Palaquium obovatum	−	−	−	+	−	+
	Pouteria malaccensis	−	−	−	−	+	−
	Pouteria obovata	+	+	+	+	+	−
Simaroubaceae	Eurycoma longifolia	−	−	−	+	−	−
Sterculiaceae	Sterculia parviflora	−	−	−	−	+	−
Symplocaceae	Symplocos adenophylla	−	−	−	+	−	+
Verbenaceae	Vitex pinnata	−	−	−	−	−	+
	Vitex trifolia	+	+	−	−	−	−
Violaceae	Rinorea sp.	−	−	−	−	+	−
Total: 50 families	139 species	13	20	13	55	56	20

Table 3. The Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index (H′) and species evenness (E) in Setiu Wetlands and three major islands of Terengganu.

Study Site	Shannon Index (H′)	Evenness (E)
Setiu Wetlands:
Freshwater swamp forest	1.85	0.38
Melaleuca swamp forest	1.67	0.30
Mangrove forest	0.98	0.20
Islands:
Pulau Bidong	3.22	0.46
Pulau Redang	3.18	0.43
Pulau Perhentian	1.95	0.68

Table 4. Relative dominance (RD_i), relative coverage (RC_i), relative frequency (Rf_i), and importance value (IV_i) of tree species with DBH of 5 cm in Setiu Wetlands and three major islands of Terengganu.

Species	RD_i	RC_i	Rf_i	IV_i
Setiu Wetlands: Melaleuca swamp forest
Melaleuca cajuputi	56.72	44.69	11.11	112.52
Ilex cymosa	25.07	26.54	11.11	62.72
Talipariti tiliaceus	4.53	7.54	11.11	23.18
Pouteria obovata	3.23	4.75	11.11	19.09
Neolitsea zeylanica	3.15	3.63	11.11	17.89
Suregada multiflora	1.98	2.23	11.11	15.33
Pittosporum ferrigeneum	2.48	4.19	5.56	12.23
Streblus taxoides	0.79	0.84	5.56	7.18
Myrica esculenta	0.32	0.56	5.56	6.43
Vitex trifolia	0.61	1.96	2.78	5.34
Suregada multiflora	1.98	2.23	11.11	15.33
Mangrove forest
Rhizophora apiculata	81.83	78.05	13.79	173.67
Excoecaria agallocha	6.89	5.37	10.34	22.6
Pouteria obovata	2.41	4.63	13.79	20.84
Talipariti tiliaceus	1.68	3.17	10.34	15.2
Intsia bijuga	1.94	2.68	10.34	14.97
Heritiera littoralis	2.04	2.44	10.34	14.82
Guioa bijuga	0.70	1.22	6.90	8.82
Ilex cymosa	1.13	0.49	6.90	8.51
Bruguiera gymnorhiza	0.55	0.73	3.45	4.73
Acacia mangium	0.47	0.24	3.45	4.16
Freshwater swamp forest
Alstonia spatulata	56.1	41.16	8.70	105.96
Gynotroches axillaris	17.0	24.30	8.70	49.99
Macaranga hypoleuca	11.96	13.25	8.70	33.91
Vitex trifolia	3.28	5.42	8.70	17.40
Campnosperma coriaceum	1.99	2.81	8.70	13.49
Cratoxylum arborescens	1.07	1.41	6.52	8.99
Melaleuca cajuputi	2.32	1.20	4.35	7.88
Ilex cymosa	1.28	1.61	4.35	7.24
Pouteria obovata	0.72	0.80	4.35	5.87
Brackenridgea hookeri	0.61	0.80	4.35	5.76
Islands: Pulau Bidong
Licania splendens	10.58	3.17	12.89	26.64
Calophyllum rupicola	9.75	3.17	9.63	22.55
Vatica sp.	8.32	3.17	10.96	22.46
Syzygium cinereum	10.78	3.17	7.26	21.21
Lithocarpus rassa	10.09	3.17	3.56	16.82
Syzygium cerinum	4.71	3.17	4.44	12.33
Syzygium sp. 2	5.94	2.38	3.85	12.17
Austrobuxus nitidus	3.80	3.17	4.74	11.72
Symplocos adenophylla	2.32	3.17	5.33	10.83
Buchanania arborescens	3.22	3.17	3.11	9.51
Pulau Redang
Shorea glauca	67.77	15.19	4.49	87.45
Madhuca sericea	4.53	12.22	4.49	21.25
Diospyros pilosanthera	0.67	9.26	4.49	14.42
Diospyros sp.	0.91	10	3.37	14.28
Litsea sp.	0.90	7.41	4.49	12.81
Barringtonia scortechinii	0.98	4.44	3.37	8.80
Artocarpus lanceifolius	3.69	1.85	2.25	7.79
Cleistanthus sumatranus	0.96	3.33	3.37	7.66
Koilodepas sp.	0.21	3.33	3.37	6.91
Swintonia floribunda	4.01	0.37	1.12	5.50
Pulau Perhentian
Vatica sp.	20.46	18.93	6.78	46.18
Syzygium cerina	13.28	16.80	6.78	36.86
Buchanania arborescens	12.91	12.00	6.78	31.69
Symplocos adenophylla	7.41	9.87	6.78	24.06
Syzygium sp. 1	5.46	6.67	6.78	18.91
Psydrax sp.	3.28	8.80	5.08	17.16
Chaetocarpus castanocarpus	3.66	5.87	6.78	16.31
Calophyllum rupicola	5.43	5.60	5.08	16.12
Syzygium sp. 3	4.54	2.40	5.08	12.03
Syzygium sp. 4	5.67	1.07	3.39	10.13

Table 5. List of five species that contribute to the highest amount of above-ground biomass (AGB).

Study Area	Species	Family	AGB (t/ha)	%
Setiu Wetlands:	Melaleuca cajuputi	Myrtaceae	84.88	64.83
Melaleuca swamp	Ilex cymosa	Aquifoliaceae	28.10	21.46
forest	Pouteria obovata	Sapotaceae	4.17	3.18
	Pittosporum ferrigenium	Pittosporaceae	3.59	2.74
	Talipariti tiliaceus	Malvaceae	3.51	2.68
Mangrove forest	Rhizophora apiculata	Rhizophoraceae	55.70	80.17
	Excoecaria agallocha	Euphorbiaceae	5.65	8.13
	Heritiera littoralis	Malvaceae	2.01	2.89
	Pouteria obovata	Sapotaceae	1.79	2.58
	Intsia bijuga	Fabaceae	1.47	2.12
Freshwater	Alstonia spatulata	Apocynaceae	87.27	58.97
swamp forest	Gynotroches axillaris	Rhizophoraceae	22.79	15.40
	Macaranga hypoleuca	Euphorbiaceae	17.7	11.96
	Vitex trifolia	Verbenaceae	4.37	2.95
	Melaleuca cajuputi	Myrtaceae	3.55	2.40
Islands: Pulau	Syzygium cinereum	Myrtaceae	26.49	11.99
Bidong	Lithocarpus rassa	Fagaceae	25.18	11.62
	Licania splendens	Chrysobalanaceae	21.22	9.79
	Calophyllum rupicola	Calophyllaceae	20.09	9.27
	Vatica sp.	Dipterocarpaceae	16.21	7.48
Pulau Redang	Shorea glauca	Dipterocarpaceae	532.27	73.10
	Swintonia floribunda	Anacardiaceae	34.20	4.70
	Mangifera macrocarpa	Anacardiaceae	29.67	4.08
	Artocarpus lanceifolius	Moraceae	24.11	3.31
	Madhuca sericea	Sapotaceae	23.12	3.18
Pulau Perhentian	Vatica sp.	Dipterocarpaceae	49.71	20.36
	Buchanania arborescens	Anacardiaceae	31.79	13.02
	Syzygium cerina	Myrtaceae	29.34	12.02
	Syzygium sp.5	Myrtaceae	18.15	7.44
	Symplocos adenophylla	Symplocaceae	17.48	7.16

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pesiu, E.; Lee, G.E.; Salam, M.R.; Salim, J.M.; Lau, K.H.; Yong, J.W.H.; Abdullah, M.T. Species Composition, Diversity, and Biomass Estimation in Coastal and Marine Protected Areas of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102380

AMA Style

Pesiu E, Lee GE, Salam MR, Salim JM, Lau KH, Yong JWH, Abdullah MT. Species Composition, Diversity, and Biomass Estimation in Coastal and Marine Protected Areas of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Agronomy. 2022; 12(10):2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pesiu, Elizabeth, Gaik Ee Lee, Muhammad Razali Salam, Jamilah Mohd Salim, Kah Hoo Lau, Jean Wan Hong Yong, and Mohd Tajuddin Abdullah. 2022. "Species Composition, Diversity, and Biomass Estimation in Coastal and Marine Protected Areas of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia" Agronomy 12, no. 10: 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102380

APA Style

Pesiu, E., Lee, G. E., Salam, M. R., Salim, J. M., Lau, K. H., Yong, J. W. H., & Abdullah, M. T. (2022). Species Composition, Diversity, and Biomass Estimation in Coastal and Marine Protected Areas of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Agronomy, 12(10), 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Species Composition, Diversity, and Biomass Estimation in Coastal and Marine Protected Areas of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

3. Results

3.1. Species Richness and Diversity

3.2. Importance Value Index

3.3. Above-Ground Biomass Estimation

4. Discussion

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI