Next Article in Journal
Farmers’ Attitudes towards Irrigating Crops with Reclaimed Water in the Framework of a Circular Economy
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Soil Moisture Content on Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Rice Seeds with Different Specific Gravity
Previous Article in Journal
Optimized Border Irrigation Improved Nitrogen Accumulation, Translocation of Winter Wheat and Reduce Soil Nitrate Nitrogen Residue
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Two-Year Study on Yield and Yield Components of Maize-White Bean Intercropping Systems under Different Sowing Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Wheat through the Combined Application of Boron and Biochar via Regulating Morpho-Physiological and Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms

1
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture Sciences and Technology, Baha Uddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
3
College of Agriculture, Bahadur Sub-Campus, Baha Uddin Zakariya University, Layyah 32200, Pakistan
4
Department of Horticulture, MNS—University of Agriculture, Multan 66000, Pakistan
5
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
6
School of Science and the Environment, Grenfell Campus, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Corner Brook, NL A2H 5G4, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(2), 434; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020434
Submission received: 26 November 2021 / Revised: 22 December 2021 / Accepted: 1 February 2022 / Published: 9 February 2022

Abstract

:
Cadmium (Cd) contamination in soil adversely affects crop productivity, grain quality, and human health. Applications of boron (B) and biochar are known to impart tolerance to crops against abiotic stresses. A pot experiment was performed to assess the effects of the sole and combined application of B and biochar on growth, physiological and antioxidant defense mechanisms, yield, and grain quality of wheat under Cd toxicity-induced stress. The treatments included control (0 mg kg−1 and 0 g kg−1), only Cd (15 mg kg−1), only B (5 g kg−1), only biochar (50 g kg−1), B plus biochar, Cd plus B, Cd plus biochar, and Cd plus B plus biochar, which were applied at the time of sowing and were arranged using completely randomized design (CRD) with five replications. The individual Cd toxicity (15 mg kg−1) significantly reduced chl a, chl b, and chl a+b, as well as primary metabolites (soluble protein, amino acids, total soluble sugar, and phenolic contents), while it increased the activities of enzymatic antioxidants like superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the leaves of wheat. In addition, Cd stress (15 mg kg−1) increased lipid peroxidation in the form of malondialdehyde (MDA), and it enhanced the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, electrolyte leakage (EL), and proline contents in the leaves. Furthermore, Cd (15 mg kg−1) contamination reduced the grain yield and yield-related attributes relative to respective no-Cd treatments. Soil-applied B and biochar improved wheat grain yield by triggering the activities of enzymatic antioxidants. Individual or combined B and biochar applications improved proline contents and reduced H2O2 and MDA contents in plants. The combined application of B and biochar enhanced soluble sugars and total phenolic as compared to the control and Cd-contaminated plants. In conclusion, the combined application of B and biochar was found to be the best soil amendment strategy to improve the yield of wheat under Cd-contaminated soil.

1. Introduction

Cadmium (Cd) is one of the main hazardous elements and is generally considered the most toxic element in cereal crops [1]. For instance, Cd toxicity hinders the growth and development of plants, which ultimately reduces their morphological and yield attributes. Therefore, the application of Cd disrupts the development of plants and decreases their structure characteristics, morphological properties, and dry biomass production [2]. Cadmium (Cd) affects the physiochemical and biological processes in plants which ultimately disrupt plants vegetative growth and development, leading to decreased grain yields and lowered grain quality [3]. Moreover, cadmium (Cd) induced oxidative stress hinders antioxidant defense systems in crop plants [4]. Due to cadmium (Cd) stress in plants, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced, which stimulate antioxidant defense systems [5,6]. Antioxidants like catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD) detoxified the adverse effects of reactive oxygen species in wheat grown under Cd-contaminated soil [7]. Severe oxidative damage was observed in crops due to enhanced ROS production [3]. Furthermore, antioxidant enzymatic processes were reduced due to cadmium (Cd) toxicity in wheat crops [8]. Globally, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the leading cereal crop and is an important staple food. Hence, heavy metal contaminations, particularly that of Cd, create deleterious effects on human health because of their translocation and accumulation in cereal grains [9,10]. Similarly, the accumulation of Cd in plant cells impairs the plant’s physiological and metabolic processes due to the possibility of imbalance in nutrient uptake, interrupting energy production [11].
Boron (B) is an important micronutrient necessary for crop growth and development, and it plays a significant role in improving plant’s physiological attributes [12]. It plays a primary role in the physiological and biochemical activities of cell membranes, photosynthesis, cell division and elongation, nitrogen use efficiency, and in improving the sugar contents of plants [13]. B inadequacy influences different structural and functional activities of a plant’s vascular bundles, for example, root initiation, translocation of sugar contents, and starch and nitrogen digestion [14]. B assumes a key part in a plant’s cell wall, where 70–90% of the total copper, zinc, and Cd are situated in certain plants [15]. It enhances the probability of tweaking Cd accumulation and poisonousness. Hence, Boron (B) eases plant cadmium poisonousness due to retreating cadmium aggregation and relieving oxidative stress which was produced due to cadmium induction [16]. The cadmium adsorption in Brassica napus was improved due to the cell wall, which was an integral part, and it forestalls cadmium exit from the cell through the cell wall, and Cd chelates on the cell wall [17]. Likewise, boron is also engaged in the formation and cross-linking of different cell wall parts [18]. Therefore, it might be assumed that cadmium aggregation and toxicity management may be helpful for successful crop growth.
Yet, there is a lack of information to support the ability of boron to enable plants to survive under cadmium toxicity. In spite of the expanding considerations on the interaction of cadmium with different biochemical cycles in plants, less data exists on the association of cadmium with fundamental microelements. One more methodology for remediating metal-contaminated soils is immobilization; the utilization of biochar is an eco-accommodating and affordable immobilizer for substantial metal pollution [19]. The amendment of biochar added through soil facilitates heavy metal stabilization via different processes, such as surface complexation, adsorption, and metal exchange [20]. In rice crops, Cd immobilization into a more steady form diminishes metal substances and also diminishes bioavailable parts due to the application of biochar. Another study reported that the use of biochar treated with acid enhanced the growth, development, and gas exchange characteristics of quinoa by lowering the accumulation of heavy metals in various plant parts, such as the roots, shoots, and grains of quinoa [21].
Although there are various research articles on the use of boron [15] or biochar as an individual application [22] to lower the bioavailability of metals and enhance crop growth and development; however, there is no literature about the combined use of B and biochar to reduce the Cd toxicity in plants. Therefore, in this study, we planned to evaluate the effects of B and soil-applied biochar, individually or combined, on the morphological, physiochemical, and biological traits of wheat grown under Cd toxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Conditions and Design

The current experiment was carried out in earthen pots in open conditions at Baha-Uddin Zakariya University, Layyah Campus, Pakistan during winter 2020 to assess the individual and combined effects of boron and biochar to mitigate the adversities of cadmium toxicity in wheat crop. Ten (10) healthy and uniform-sized seeds of the wheat variety Fakhar-e-Bhakhar-2019 were planted in each pot directly and filled with soil to avoid germination losses. After seven days of germination, thinning was done, and only five plants were kept in each pot to maintain optimum plant populations. Each earthen pot was 16 cm in diameter and 45 cm in height, and they were filled with 15 kg of sandy loam soil. For better crop growth and development, 0.08, 0.06, and 0.05 g N, P, and K, respectively, (in the form of urea 46% N, DAP 46% P2O5, and MOP 60% K2O kg−1 of soil) were mixed in the soil at the time of sowing by the soil mass method. Treatments, comprised of the control, only Cd (15 mg kg−1), only B (5 g kg−1), only biochar (50 g kg−1), B + biochar (5 g kg−1 + 50 g kg−1), Cd + B (10 mg kg−1 + 5 g kg−1), Cd + biochar (10 mg kg−1 + 50 g kg−1), and Cd + B + biochar (10 mg kg−1 + 5 g kg−1 + 50 g kg−1 soil) were thoroughly mixed in sandy loam soil at the time of planting. These experimental treatments were arranged using completely randomized design (CRD) with five replications. There was a total 40 experimental units (8 treatments × 5 replications) in the experiment. Each replication contained three pots having five plants in each pot. Boron and biochar were mixed thoroughly, individually or combined, according to treatments. Cadmium stress was induced by spiking the soil using analytical grade cadmium chloride (CdCl2).

2.2. Preparation of Rice Straw Biochar

Biochar was prepared by using rice straw according to the method of Qayyum et al., 2015 [23]. Rice straw was put in the biochar machine for pyrolysis at 500 °C in anaerobic conditions. After 40 min, pyrolysed biochar was taken from the machines and passed through a sieve (2 mm) after crushing. Chemical properties of the rice straw biochar are given in Table S1.

2.3. Morphological and Yield-Related Attributes

Seventy-five DAS days after sowing, five plants were randomly selected from each treatment. Leaf samples were collected from each plant and leaf area was measured with the help of a leaf area meter (CI-203CA Leaf Conveyor; 1554 NE 3rd Ave Camas, WA, USA). Upon reaching maturity, five plants were selected randomly, and plant height was measured from the ground to the tip of the plant using a meter rod. Spikes from the selected plants were separated with the help of scissors and spike length was measured with a measuring tape. The numbers of grains per spike were counted from five randomly selected spikes from each treatment after manually threshing the spike and grain yield and 100-grain weight were calculated. The 100 seeds were counted with a digital seed counter from each replication, then these seeds were weighed on an electric balance to calculate 100-grain weight and their average weight was calculated. For measuring the grain yield, seeds were cleaned from each replication, then weighed, and the average per plant was calculated.

2.4. Determination Photosynthetic Pigments

Photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid) were determined by using an extract of 0.5 g of fresh leaves. Leaf extract was obtained by keeping the leaves in 5 mL of 80% acetone for 24 h. Extracts were then centrifuged at 10,000× g. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid contents were determined by taking the absorbance reading of supernatant samples at 645, 663, and 480 nm, respectively, with a spectrophotometer [24].

2.5. Extraction of Enzymes

For protein and antioxidant enzyme assays, frozen leaves were ground to a fine powder with liquid nitrogen and were extracted with ice-cold 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing 5% (w/v) sucrose and 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol (3:1 buffer volume/FW). The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was used for enzyme activity and protein determinations. Preparations for enzyme extraction and enzyme assay were carried out at 4 °C.

2.5.1. Determination of Primary Metabolites

Total soluble proteins in the leaf sample were determined through Bradford [25] assay by using Coomassie Blue dye. The 100 µL leaf sample and 2 mL Bradford reagent were mixed in the test tube. The mixture was incubated for 20 min in the dark and the absorbance reading was determined at 595 nm. In 50 mM chilled potassium phosphate buffer (5 mL; pH 7.5), fresh leaf tissues (0.2 g) were homogenized and centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000× g. In a test tube, equal volumes of 10% pyridine and acid ninhydrin were homogenized with 1 mL of supernatant. After that, heat was given at 95 °C to the reaction mixture for 30 min using a water bath. Then, by using distilled water, the volume of the reaction mixture was raised up to 7.5 mL. Finally, at 570 nm, absorbance of the reaction mixture was observed [26].
In order to measure the total soluble sugars, 5 mL of aqueous ethanol (80%) and 0.2-g of fresh leaf tissues were homogenized, then centrifuged for 10 min at 3500 g. The sample extract (100 μL) obtained was then reacted with enthrone reagent (3 mL). Then, by using a water bath, the mixture was heated for 10 min at 95 °C. The mixture was then cooled and, using a spectrophotometer, absorbance was observed at 625 nm [27]. By using the method of Julkenen-Titto [28], the total phenolic contents of fresh leaf samples were determined. For this purpose, 1 mL of acetone (80%) and 0.2 g of fresh leaf tissues were homogenized. They were then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min, then 20% Na2CO3 (2.5 mL), 0.5-mL Folin-Ciocalteu phenol re-agent, and supernatant (100 μL) were added to the test tube, and it was shaken. Then, in order to make a 5 mL final volume, distilled water was added. Lastly, absorbance was recorded at 750 nm after 20 min.

2.5.2. Determination of Enzymatic Antioxidant Activities

SOD activity assay was based on the method of Dhindsa et al [29], which is based on the measurement of inhibition in the photochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) spectrophotometrically at 560 nm. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 13 mM methionine, 75 μM NBT, 0.1 μM EDTA, 4 μM riboflavin, and the required amount of enzyme extract. The reaction was started by adding riboflavin and placing the tubes under two 15 W fluorescent lamps for 15 min. A complete reaction mixture without enzyme, which gave the maximal colour, served as the control. A non-irradiated, complete reaction mixture served as a blank. One unit of SOD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to cause 50% inhibition of the reduction of NBT as monitored at 560 nm, which was measured according to the method of Giannopolitis and Ries [30]. POD activity was determined at 436 nm by its ability to convert guaiacol to tetra guaiacol (ε = 26.6 mM−1 cm−1), according to the method of Polle et al. [31]. The reaction mixture contained 100 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 20.1 mM guaiacol, 10 mM H2O2, and enzyme extract. The increase in absorbance was recorded by the addition of H2O2 at 436 nm for 5 min. CAT activity was determined by monitoring the disappearance of H2O2 at 240 nm (ε = 40 mM−1 cm−1), according to the method of Aebi [32]. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).
In order to determine H2O2 content, 1.5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (0.1%) and fresh leaf tissue (0.15 g) were homogenized. Then, centrifugation of the homogenate was done at 12,000× g for 15 min. Then, 0.5 mL of potassium sulfate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) and 1 mL of potassium iodide were added to supernatant. At 390 nm, using a spectrophotometer, absorbance of the reaction mixture and trichloroacetic acid (0.1%) was observed. By doing comparison of the absorbance with a standard curve, the amount of H2O2 content was measured [33].

2.6. MDA Determination

Hodges et al. [34] described a method called the TBA method. Utilizing this method, the amount of MDA content was measured. For the purpose of analysis, fresh leaves (0.15 g) of wheat were ground with 5.0 mL of 5% (w/v) TCA. This was done in a mortar that was placed an ice bath, and then centrifugation was done. Then, by using a spectrophotometer, MDA content was measured at 600 nm and at 532 nm. For measuring the proline content, 5 mL sulpho-salicylic acid (3%) and fresh leaf tissue (0.1 g) were homogenized. Then, the homogenate was centrifuged. Then, ninhydrin and glacial acetic acid reagent were added to supernatant. By using a water bath, 1 h boiling of the reaction mixture was done. After boiling, the reaction mixture was cooled for 10 min in an ice bath. Using a spectrophotometer, absorbance was measured at 520 nm and proline was extracted from the mixture with toluene [35].

2.7. Determination of Electrolytic Leakage

Using the method of Dionisio-Sese and Tobita [36], electrolyte leakage was measured. In a test tube, 10 mL distilled water and small and equal sized pieces of fresh leaf tissue (0.5 g) were added and stirred for 10 s. The test tubes were then left overnight, and electrical conductivity (EC1) was calculated. For measuring the EC2, test tubes were autoclaved at 100 °C for 1 h.

2.8. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis of data was done with the help of Statistix 8.1 software (Analytical Software, Statistix; Tallahassee, FL, USA, 1985–2003) by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) techniques. For mean separation at the 5% probability level, Tukey’s test was used. The graphical presentation of data was done by using Sigma Plot.

3. Results

3.1. Plant Height, Yield, and Yield Components

Cadmium stress had a drastic effect on plant growth parameters, and it significantly reduced plant height by 16.57%, spike length by 15.58%, grains per spike by 16.43%, 100-grain weight by 14.54%, and grain yield per plant by 16.33%, as compared to the control (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The applications of solely boron or biochar, and their combination, significantly affected the plants growth parameters. Under the cadmium stress condition, boron application enhanced plant height by 4.34%, spike length by 8.19%, grains per spike by 4.76%, 100-grain weight by 7.97%, and grain yield per plant by 10.10% and biochar application enhanced plant height by 3.01%, spike length by 5.86%, grains per spike by 10.77%, 100-grain weight by 12.50%, and grain yield per plant by 14.81% (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Likewise, the combined application of boron and biochar enhanced plant height by 5.34%, spike length by 12.34%, grains per spike by 13.75%, 100-grain weight by 15.51%, and grain yield per plant by 16.83% under cadmium stress conditions (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The maximum results were observed when the combined application of boron and biochar was done on wheat plants.

3.2. Photosynthetic Pigments

Photosynthetic pigments (chl. a, chl. b, chl. a+b, chl. a/b, and carotenoid) of flag leaves were measured at the heading stage. In the absence of Cd stress, boron application enhanced 14.81% chl a, 18.51% chl b, 15.74% chl a+b, 3.98% chl a/b, and 17.64% carotenoid, while the biochar application enhanced 13.16% chl a, 6.17% chl b, 11.41% chl a+b, and 6.64% chl a/b as compared to individual Cd stress treatment. The sole application of biochar did not show any significant effect on carotenoid. However, the combination of both boron and biochar resulted in maximum activity and enhanced 22.22% chl a, 27.16% chl b 23.45% chl a+b, and 29.41% carotenoid as compared to the control, and chlorophyll a/b contents were reduced up to 4.65% when biochar was applied. However, when cadmium stress was imposed, it drastically decreased the content of photosynthetic pigments. It reduced 4.52% chl a, 25.92% chl b, 9.87% chl a+b, and 23.52% carotenoid content and chlorophyll a/b content were increased under Cd stress by 27.90%. The boron and biochar application on Cd-treated plants showed an almost similar effect with one another and enhanced 9.48% chl a, 20.0% chl b, 11.64% chl a+b, and 15.38% carotenoid as compared to Cd-treated plants. The combined application of biochar and boron on Cd-stressed plants enhanced 14.65% chl a, 23.33% chl b, 16.09% chl a+b, and 23.07% carotenoid as compared to Cd-stressed plants. There was a declined effect of boron and biochar and their combination on chlorophyll a/b under cadmium stress (Table 1).

3.3. Enzymatic Antioxidants Activities

It was observed that application of only boron on wheat plants enhanced antioxidant activity as compared to the control condition. SOD, CAT, POD, and ascorbate peroxidase activities were improved by 17.03%, 20.57%, 13.53%, and 8.51%, respectively, as compared to the control. Biochar application enhanced 23.59% SOD, 9.59% CAT, 8.15% POD, and 10.63% ascorbate peroxidase as compared to control. However, when combined application of boron and biochar was done, it showed maximum results and increased 37.60% SOD, 13.25% CAT, 7.23% POD, and 19.14% ascorbate peroxidase as compared to control. In comparison, when cadmium stress was imposed, it boosted the antioxidant activity even much more than those plants where application of boron and biochar was done and increased 61.56% SOD, 60.12% CAT, 43.07% POD, and 90.42% ascorbate peroxidase as compared to the control. When boron was applied on Cd-treated plants, it enhanced 94.02% SOD, 8.78% CAT, 25.48% POD, and 22.90% ascorbate peroxidase activity as compared to control, and the application of biochar on Cd-treated plants resulted in 32.25%, 2.06%, 14.73%, and 7.82% increases in SOD, CAT, POD, and ascorbate peroxidase activity, respectively as compared to individual application of Cd. The combination of boron and biochar showed maximum results and enhanced 51.57% SOD, 24.16% CAT, 32.58% POD, and 41.34% ascorbate peroxidase activity as compared to Cd-stressed plants (Table 2).

3.4. Lipid Peroxidation

It was recorded that the application of only boron resulted in a 30.74% increase in H2O2 and 3.71% in soluble protein, with a 16.07% decline in malondialdehyde MDA content and 19.31% in electrolyte leakage as compared to the control conditions. Likewise, biochar application increased H2O2 by 20.24% and soluble protein by 16.64%, while it reduced malondialdehyde MDA content by 8.35% and electrolyte leakage by 14.39% as compared to control in wheat plants. When the combination of boron and biochar was applied, it also enhanced 37.25% H2O2 and soluble protein by 15.86% and reduced 4.25% malondialdehyde MDA content and 23.79% electrolyte leakage as compared to control. Although, when Cd stress was imposed, it increased 133.22% H2O2, 107.88% malondialdehyde MDA content, and 120.65% electrolyte leakage as compared to the control, but soluble protein content was reduced by 76.94% as compared to control. When these Cd-treated plants were treated with boron, it decreased 18.68% H2O2, 29.87% malondialdehyde MDA content, and 26.98% electrolyte leakage as compared to individual application of Cd, while soluble protein content was increased by 90.24% as compared to individual application of Cd when boron was applied on Cd-treated plants. On the other hand, the application of biochar on Cd-treated plants resulted in 27.66%, 15.76%, and 21.27% decreases in H2O2, malondialdehyde MDA content, and electrolyte leakage, respectively as compared to individual application of Cd, while soluble protein content was increased by 100.0% as compared to individual application of Cd. However, the combination of boron and biochar decreased the 34.94% H2O2, 40.97% malondialdehyde contents MDA, and 38.51% electrolyte leakage as compared to individual application of Cd, the soluble protein content was increased by 169.26% as compared to individual application of Cd (Table 3).

3.5. Osmo-Protectance

Cadmium stress increased free proline by 37.95%, while it reduced soluble sugar by 56.25% and total phenolic by 64.13% in wheat, as compared to the control. However, when boron was applied to cadmium-stressed plants, it increased 19.83% total phenolic, 43.95% soluble sugar, and 36.17% total phenolic as compared to control, while biochar application on cadmium-stressed plants enhanced 9.26% total phenolic, 47.29% soluble sugar, and 27.64% total phenolic as compared to cadmium-stressed plants. The combination of boron and biochar enhanced 26.72% total phenolic, 53.95% soluble sugar, and 34.12% total phenolic as compared to cadmium-stressed plants (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The accumulation and toxicity of cadmium in crops can be reduced by lowering cadmium uptake in roots, as well as its translocation to above-ground plant parts.

4.1. Morphological and Yield Traits

From the results of this study, it was revealed that after addition of biochar in Cd-contaminated soil, morphological and yield traits were improved as compared to the soil where biochar was not added (Figure 1). This enhancement in different morphological as well as yield traits might be accredited to the nourishing significance of biochar that enhances soil fertility and productivity. Another possible reason for this improvement is attributed to its internal capacity to enhance organic mineralization and increase crop growth, as well as yields [37,38]. Above all, biochar acts as a buffer and is a source of important plant nutrients in a sufficient quantity availability which markedly boosts crop’s productivity [39]. These findings were established because of a noticeable reduction in the phytoavailability of cadmium in soil amended with biochar, hence hindering plant’s uptake of Cd, which might have enhanced the ability of soil adsorption in biochar-amended soil. It has been reported that biochar has the ability to increase soil acidity and can improve the metal and basic nutrient availability from soil solutions that have an ability to reduce metal toxicity and, ultimately, improve crop growth and yield. Bashir et al. [40] reported in one previous study that the application of biochar in cadmium-polluted soils can proficiently overcome nutrient losses through leaching and volatilization, which is a vital factor in increasing soil fertility status and plant growth and yield.
The findings of our research depicted that the use of B application enhanced yield parameters due to its positive effects on plant growth (Figure 1). Lower yields of cadmium-stressed plants might be reasoned to the fast reduction in photosynthetic contents and assimilates. Hence, the movement of food assimilates from stem to grain is the main source, as well as a limiting factor for growth and development, and for reduction, in yields. Clemens et al. [41] showed that cadmium stress lowers plant growth first during the osmotic stress phase and, eventually, induces leaf senescence during the toxicity phase when more Cd is accumulated in leaves during transpiration. Ziaeyan and Rajaie [42] reported that the application of boron markedly enhanced plant biological yield, grain yield, 100-grain weight, number of grains per spike, and boron concentration in the tissues of plants grown under higher Cd-accumulated conditions. Boron, as an integral micronutrient, plays vital role in enhancing pollen grain germination and pollen tube enlargement, fruit set percentage, and, finally, yield. Boron is responsible for stimulating cell division, biosynthesis, and translocation of sugars, water, and nutrient uptake [43].

4.2. Photosynthetic Traits

Photosynthetic activity is the basic functional process responsible for the growth and development of plants, but due to cadmium toxicity and cadmium stress, photosynthetic pigments are decreased in crop plants [44,45]. So, this cadmium stress leads to drastic effects on net photosynthetic processes. Presently, it was reported that the application of exogenous cadmium lowered chlorophyll contents such as chl a, chl b, and carotenoid (Table 2). There was a decrease in carboxylase, ribose 1, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, and 5-diphosphate carboxylase activities, which led to a reduction in photosynthetic pigments caused by cadmium toxicity. There was also an observation of the reduction in production of H2O2, which caused degradation of chlorophyll by an enzymatic action, hindered stomatal opening, and played a limiting function in the biochemical processes of crop plants, which ultimately lowered the accumulation of photosynthetic pigments [46]. From the present experiment’s results, it was found that the use of biochar applications improved photosynthesis components and chlorophyll contents such as chl a, chl b, and carotenoid under cadmium toxicity or cadmium stress conditions (Table 2). This significant improvement was due to the reason that the application of biochar has a positive effect on the stabilization of heavy metals present in the soil, ameliorating the hindering impact of cadmium on photosynthetic processes and photosynthetic pigments, such as chlorophyll, production because of its porosity in structure, higher CEC, higher pH, and different surface complexities [47]. The results of this experiment depicted that the application of boron significantly improved wheat chlorophyll contents such as chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid, even in the presence of cadmium stress (Table 2).
In many research article findings, boron is found to have ameliorating effects on the toxicity of heavy metals in various crop plants, though it is still unclear if boron can increase the resistance response of plants to heavy metals toxicity. Under cadmium toxicity, enhanced chlorophyll pigments might be due to B application because B is implicated in cell wall structure formation and cell wall functioning. B has the ability to connect borate complexes with several polyhydroxy compounds, including pectin assembly, glycosylinositol phosphoryl ceramides (GIPCs,) and rhamnogalacturonan-II (RG-II). Firstly, the cell wall of plants comes into contact with toxic heavy metals, being the outermost layer of a plant cell. The cell wall is the first respondent to heavy metal toxicity, as well as serving as a sink for toxic metals adsorption and accumulation [48]. Due to this active behavior and response of the cell wall, the accumulation of heavy metals is increased in the cell wall and the movement of heavy metals to protoplast is decreased. Different compounds present in the cell wall, such as certain carbohydrates and pectic sites, create immobilization of toxic metals by interconnecting heavy metal ions and hindering these compounds from entering into the cell’s internal protoplasm. Cell walls can perform as a bio-sorbent for ameliorating the toxic impact of toxic heavy metals [48,49].

4.3. Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

Presently, the results of this experiment showed that the application of exogenous cadmium caused stress and decreased the functions of various antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT, H2O2, POD, and MDA, and electrolytic breakdown and leakage, as well as soluble proteins in wheat (Table 3 and Table 4). This reduction was due to the reason that under cadmium stress, a greater number of ROS are formed. Those ROS can be significantly harmful to the functioning and metabolic processes of plants. Moreover, cadmium toxicity is also related to free radicals in membrane structures that lead to reductions in mobilization and the penetration of free ions in plant tissues, producing bigger quantities of MDA, and thus involving oxidative stress in plants, which eventually leads to a decline in antioxidant enzyme activities [50]. The use of biochar enhanced the processes of antioxidant enzymes and improved the response of plants against oxidative stress produced due to Cd [51].
Presently, in our results, the use of biochar improved the performance of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, and CAT, successfully ameliorating the adverse effects of Cd in wheat (Table 3). This positive effect is due to the reason that CAT activity is responsible for removing the impacts of toxicity of peroxides in plant cells, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) is the prime enzyme acting as a decomposer for superoxide radicals into H2O2. POD function in crop plants is to aid respiratory activities in plants and the changing of phenols to quinines for lowering the stress of heavy-metal-induced oxidative stress [52]. The plants can resist metal-induced stress by improving their health with the help of better antioxidant defense mechanisms and can eliminate active oxygen with the addition of various amendments. Furthermore, a decrease of Cd concentration in various parts of plants likewise enhances anti-ROS safety activities in crop plants. The antioxidant enzymatic activities or antioxidant defense systems contribute key functioning in plants in relation to the response to heavy metal toxicity and stress. Enhanced levels of antioxidant enzymatic reactions can significantly diminish deposited ROS in crop plants. Several research findings have suggested that boron (B) diminishes cadmium stress by triggering antioxidant enzyme systems in crops [53]. In rice crops, improved performance of antioxidant enzymes played a key role in the mechanisms of resistance due to the addition of B against Cd toxicity [16]. As far as current experiment findings have determined, Cd occurrence leads to greater levels of MDA, O−2, and H2O2, and increases the superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase functions to remove deposited reactive oxygen species in shoots. Surprisingly, the application of B under cadmium stress conditions worked to lower ROS deposition in shoots by triggering an antioxidant enzyme mechanism, relieving the lipid peroxidation of the cell membrane, and regulating the growth of wheat shoots (Table 3). This positive improvement in antioxidant enzyme activities might be due to the reason that boron, as a structural part, plays a role in building the cell wall structure and its components [18]. This cell wall act as the primary obstacle for plant cells exposed to contact with toxic heavy metals [54]. It performs an important function in enhancing plant’s cadmium resistance through hindering Cd entry into plant cells and by adsorption of cadmium in cell wall components, which include cellulose, hemi cellulose, and pectin, and can chelate cadmium in the cell wall to lower the movement of cadmium into cells, and thus enhances antioxidant enzyme activities [55].

4.4. Biochemical Traits

From our experiment findings, it was depicted that Cd toxicity reduced soluble sugar, total phenolic, and proline. Biochar application effectively increased proline, total phenolic, and soluble sugar contents in wheat under CD stress (Table 4). Various primary and secondary metabolic products such as soluble sugars and total proline and phenolic compounds play a vital role in cell osmotic adjustments. During stressful conditions, proline accumulation is higher in cells, as reported in many research studies. The findings of our experiment are in line with the results reported by [56]. The enhancement of the osmo-protectants, i.e., soluble sugars, proline, and total phenolic, could be attributed to biochar addition as a soil amendment in increasing the meristematic activity, which results in accelerated cell division and enlargement that ultimately improves the activity of osmo-protectants like proline, soluble sugar, and total phenolic [57]. From the current study, it was exhibited that biochar improved the osmo-protectants under Cd stress (Table 4). This improvement might be attributed to biochar application, which has the ability to hold water alongside increased nutrient absorption. Moreover, it has also been undeniably established that biochar can boost dry matter production (root and leaves) as a result of its positive effect on osmo-protectants under Cd stress [58].

5. Conclusions

It was concluded that B and biochar, when applied together at a 5 g kg−1 and 50 g kg−1 rate, significantly improved wheat plant’s photosynthetic pigments, enzymatic activities, lipid peroxidation, osmo-protectants, and morphological and yield traits under both normal conditions and Cd toxicity. Therefore, it is suggested that wheat’s photosynthetic pigments, enzymatic activities, lipid peroxidation, osmo-protectants, and morphological yield traits can be improved through the combined application of B and biochar under heavy metal (Cd) toxicity with a rate of 5 g kg−1 and 50 g kg−1, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy12020434/s1, Table S1: The chemical composition of rice straw biochar.

Author Contributions

S.H. (Sajjad Hussain), J.Y., and A.S. designed the study and developed and drafted the manuscript. S.H. (Shabir Hussain), S.U. and M.C. gave technical support and helped in statistical analyses. S.H. (Sajjad Hussain), T.A. and F.N. performed the chemical analyses. A.A.-H., M.S.E., H.U.-R. and M.I. helped in draft-editing and grammatic correction. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0800305), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science (2021–2022) and the research supporting project number RSP-2021/219 at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Compliments goes to the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0800305), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science (2021–2022). The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/219), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anjum, S.A.; Tanveer, M.; Hussain, S.; Shahzad, B.; Ashraf, U.; Fahad, S.; Hassan, W.; Jan, S.; Khan, I.; Saleem, M.F.; et al. Osmoregulation and antioxidant production in maize under combined cadmium and arsenic stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 11864–11875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fattahi, B.; Arzani, K.; Souri, M.K.; Barzegar, M. Effects of cadmium and lead on seed germination, morphological traits, and essential oil composition of sweet basil (Ocimumbasilicum L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 138, 111584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cui, Y.; Wang, Q. Physiological responses of maize to elemental sulphur and cadmium stress. Plant Soil Environ. 2018, 52, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, Y. Assessing cadmium exposure risks of vegetables with plant uptake factor and soil property. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 238, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ismael, M.A.; Elyamine, A.M.; Moussa, M.G.; Cai, M.; Zhao, X.; Hu, C. Cadmium in plants: Uptake, toxicity, and its interactions with selenium fertilizers. Metallomics 2019, 11, 255–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yizhu, L.; Imtiaz, M.; Ditta, A.; Rizwan, M.S.; Ashraf, M.; Mehmood, S.; Aziz, O.; Mubeen, F.; Ali, M.; Elahi, N.N.; et al. Response of growth, antioxidant enzymes and root exudates production towards as stress in Pteris vittata and in Astragalus sinicus colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 2340–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, Z.S.; Rizwan, M.; Hafeez, M.; Ali, S.; Adrees, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Khalid, S.; Rehman, M.Z.U.; Sarwar, M.A. Effects of silicon nanoparticles on growth and physiology of wheat in cadmium contaminated soil under different soil moisture levels. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 4958–4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thind, S.; Hussain, I.; Ali, S.; Hussain, S.; Rasheed, R.; Ali, B.; Hussain, H.A. Physiological and biochemical bases of foliar silicon-induced alleviation of cadmium toxicity in wheat. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 20, 2714–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suriyagoda, L.D.B.; Dittert, K.; Lambers, H. Mechanism of arsenic uptake, translocation and plant resistance to accumulate arsenic in rice grains. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 253, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bianucci, E.; Peralta, J.M.; Furlan, A.; Hernández, L.E.; Castro, S. Arsenic in wheat, maize, and other crops. In Arsenic in Drinking Water and Food; Srivastava, S., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 279–306. [Google Scholar]
  11. Raza, A.; Habib, M.; Kakavand, S.N.; Zahid, Z.; Zahra, N.; Sharif, R.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Phytoremediation of Cadmium: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Mechanisms. Biology 2020, 9, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hansch, R.; Mendel, R.R. Physiological Functions of Mineral Micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shireen, F.; Nawaz, M.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Sohail, H.; Bie, Z. Boron: Functions and Approaches to Enhance Its Availability in Plants for Sustainable Agriculture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; González-Fontes, A. Boron deficiency decreases plasmalemma H+-ATPase expression and nitrate uptake, and promotes ammonium assimilation into asparagine in tobacco roots. Planta 2007, 226, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Riaz, M.; Kamran, M.; Fang, Y.; Yang, G.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Q.; Deng, L.; Wang, Y.; et al. Boron supply alleviates cadmium toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by enhancing cadmium adsorption on cell wall and triggering antioxidant defense system in roots. Chemosphere 2021, 266, 128938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, D.; Chen, D.; Xue, R.; Long, J.; Lin, X.; Lin, Y.; Jia, L.; Zeng, R.; Song, Y. Effects of boron, silicon and their interactions on cadmium accumulation and toxicity in rice plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 367, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, F.; Liu, M.; Li, Y.; Che, Y.; Xiao, Y. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, biochar and cadmium on the yield and element uptake of Medicago sativa. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 655, 1150–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, S.; Hu, C.; Tan, Q.; Xu, S.; Sun, X. Nitric oxide mediates molybdenum-induced antioxidant defense in wheat under drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Srivastava, H.M.; Günerhan, H.; Ghanbari, B. Exact traveling wave solutions for resonance nonlinear Schrödinger equation with intermodal dispersions and the Kerr law nonlinearity. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2019, 42, 7210–7221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, A.; Bhattacharya, T. Biochar: A sustainable solution. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 6642–6680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Naeem, M.A.; Shabbir, A.; Amjad, M.; Abbas, G.; Imran, M.; Murtaza, B.; Tahir, M.; Ahmad, A. Acid treated biochar enhances cadmium tolerance by restricting its uptake and improving physio-chemical attributes in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 191, 110–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ibrahim, I.A.; Emara, H.A.; Nower, A.A.; Abodiab, L. In vitro cultivation of potato plants. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. 2016, 5, 858–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qayyum, M.F.; Abid, M.; Danish, S.; Saeed, M.K.; Ali, M.A. Effects of various biochars on seed germination and carbon mineralization in an alkaline soil. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 51, 977–982. [Google Scholar]
  24. Aron, D. Copper enzymes isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hamilton, P.B.; Van-Slyke, D.D. Amino acid determination with ninhydrin. J. Biol. Chem. 1943, 150, 231–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yemm, E.; Willis, A.J. The estimation of carbohydrate in plant extracts by Anthrone. Biochem. J. 1954, 57, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Julkunen-Titto, R. Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows: Methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1985, 33, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dhindsa, R.S.; Dhindsa, P.P.; Thorpe, T.A. Leaf senescence correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid-peroxidation and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J. Exp. Bot. 1980, 32, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Giannopolitis, C.N.; Reis, S.K. Superoxide dismutase I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1997, 59, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Polle, A.; Otter, T.; Seifert, F. Apoplastic peroxidases and lignification in needles of Norway Spruce Piceaabies L. Plant Physiol. 1994, 106, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants. Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hodges, D.M.; DeLong, J.M.; Forney, C.F.; Prange, R.K. Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 1999, 207, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dionisio-Sese, M.L.; Tobita, S. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Sci. 1998, 135, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rehman, M.Z.; Khalid, H.; Akmal, F.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Iqbal, M.; Khalid, M.U.; Azhar, M. Effect of limestone, lignite and biochar applied alone and combined on cadmium uptake in wheat and rice under rotation in an effluent irrigated field. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 227, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bashir, S.; Rehman, M.; Yousaf, M.; Salam, A.; Gulshan, A.B.; Iqbal, J.; Aziz, I.; Azeem, M.; Rukh, S.; Asghar, R.M.A. Comparative efficiency of wheat straw and sugarcane bagasse biochar reduces the cadmium bioavailability to spinach and enhances the microbial activity in contaminated soil. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2019, 21, 1098–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ali, I.; Ullah, S.; He, L.; Zhao, Q.; Iqbal, A.; Wei, S.; Shah, T.; Ali, N.; Bo, Y.; Adnan, M.; et al. Combined application of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer improves rice yield, microbial activity and N-metabolism in a pot experiment. Peer J. 2020, 8, e10311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bashir, S.; Hussain, Q.; Akmal, M.; Riaz, M.; Hu, H.Q.; Ijaz, S.S.; Iqbal, M.; Abro, S.; Mehmood, S.; Ahmad, M. Sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar reduces the cadmium and chromium bioavailability to mash bean and enhances the microbial activity in contaminated soil. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 874–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Clemens, S.; Aarts, M.G.M.; Thomine, S.; Verbruggen, N. Plant science: The key to preventing slow cadmium poisoning. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ziaeyan, A.H.; Rajaie, M. Combined effect of zinc and boron on yield and nutrients accumulation in corn. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2009, 3, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ahmed, W.; Niaz, A.; Kanwal, S.; Rahmatullah, A. Role of boron in plant growth. J. Agric. Res. 2009, 47, 329–338. [Google Scholar]
  44. Xu, C.Y.; Hosseini-Bai, S.; Hao, Y.; Rachaputi, R.C.; Wang, H.; Xu, Z.; Wallace, H. Effect of biochar amendment on yield and photosynthesis of peanut on two types of soils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 6112–6125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, L.; Ai, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Tang, M.D. Exogenous silicon mediates alleviation of cadmium stress by promoting photosynthetic activity and activities of antioxidative enzymes in rice. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Deng, X.P.; Cheng, Y.J.; Wu, X.B.; Kwak, S.S.; Chen, W.; Egrinya, A. Exogenous hydrogen peroxide positively influences root growth and metabolism in leaves of sweet potato seedlings. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2012, 6, 1572–1578. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kamran, M.; Malik, Z.; Parveen, A.; Huang, L.; Riaz, M.; Bashir, S.; Mustafa, A.; Abbasi, G.H.; Xue, B.; Ali, U. Ameliorative effects of biochar on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth and heavy metal immobilization in soil irrigated with untreated wastewater. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Parrotta, L.; Guerriero, G.; Sergeant, K.; Cai, G.; Hausman, J.F. Target or barrier? The cell walls of early-and later-diverging plants vs. cadmium toxicity: Differences in the response mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Voxeur, A.; Fry, S.C. Glycosylinositolphosphorylceramides (GIPCs) from Rosa cell cultures are boron-bridged in the plasma membrane and form complexes with rhamnogalacturonan II. Plant J. 2014, 79, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Muszyńska, E.; Labudda, M.; Różańska, E.; Hanus-Fajerska, E.; Koszelnik-Leszek, A. Structural, physiological and genetic diversification of Silene vulgaris ecotypes from heavy metal-contaminated areas and their synchronous in vitro cultivation. Planta 2019, 249, 1761–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Novak, J.M.; Ippolito, J.A.; Watts, D.W.; Sigua, G.C.; Ducey, T.F.; Johnson, M.G. Biochar compost blends facilitate switchgrass growth in mine soils by reducing Cd and Zn bioavailability. Biochar 2019, 1, 97–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cheng, J.; Qiu, H.; Chang, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Yin, W. The effect of cadmium on the growth and antioxidant response for freshwater algae Chlorella vulgaris. Springerplus 2016, 5, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Riaz, M.; Yan, L.; Wu, X.; Hussain, S.; Aziz, O.; Wang, Y.; Imran, M.; Jiang, C. Boron alleviates the aluminum toxicity in trifoliate orange by regulating antioxidant defense system and reducing root cell injury. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 208, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gutsch, A.; Keunen, E.; Guerriero, G.; Renaut, J.; Cuypers, A.; Hausman, J.F.; Sergeant, K.; Luo, Z.B. Long-term cadmium exposure influences the abundance of proteins that impact the cell wall structure in Medicago sativa stems. Plant Biol. 2018, 20, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Peng, J.; He, Y.; Ye, L.; Shen, T.; Liu, F.; Kong, W. Moisture influence reducing method for heavy metals detection in plant materials using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: A case study for chromium content detection in rice leaves. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 7593–7600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Noreen, S.; Faiz, S.; Akhter, M.S.; Shah, K.H. Influence of Foliar Application of Osmoprotectants to Ameliorate Salt Stress in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Sarhad J. Agric. 2019, 35, 1316–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.M.; Gao, Q.; Xue, L.H.; Yang, L.Z.; Li, H.X.; Feng, Y.F. Effects of different biochar application patterns on rice growth and yield. J. Agric. Resour. Environ. 2018, 1, 58–65. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Banerjee, A.; BorhannuddinBhuyan, M.H.M.; Roychoudhury, A.; Al Mahmud, J.; Fujita, M. Targeting glycinebetaine for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants: Physiological mechanism, molecular interaction and signaling. Phyton 2019, 88, 185–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The influence of boron and biochar on plant height (a), spike length (b), number of grains (c), and 100-grain weight (d) of wheat under Cd stress, Ck control, Cd control stress, B boron, BC biochar, B+BC boron and biochar, Cd+B cadmium and Boron, Cd+BC cadmium and biochar and Cd+B+BC cadmium, boron and biochar. Different letters above the column indicate significance level among the treatments.
Figure 1. The influence of boron and biochar on plant height (a), spike length (b), number of grains (c), and 100-grain weight (d) of wheat under Cd stress, Ck control, Cd control stress, B boron, BC biochar, B+BC boron and biochar, Cd+B cadmium and Boron, Cd+BC cadmium and biochar and Cd+B+BC cadmium, boron and biochar. Different letters above the column indicate significance level among the treatments.
Agronomy 12 00434 g001
Figure 2. The influence of boron and biochar on the grain yield of wheat under Cd stress, Ck control, Cd control stress, B boron, BC biochar, B+BC boron and biochar, Cd+B cadmium and Boron, Cd+BC cadmium and biochar and Cd+B+BC cadmium, boron, and biochar. Different letters above the column indicate significance level among the treatments.
Figure 2. The influence of boron and biochar on the grain yield of wheat under Cd stress, Ck control, Cd control stress, B boron, BC biochar, B+BC boron and biochar, Cd+B cadmium and Boron, Cd+BC cadmium and biochar and Cd+B+BC cadmium, boron, and biochar. Different letters above the column indicate significance level among the treatments.
Agronomy 12 00434 g002
Table 1. The influence of the individual and combined applications of boron and biochar on the photosynthetic pigments of wheat leaves under cadmium stress.
Table 1. The influence of the individual and combined applications of boron and biochar on the photosynthetic pigments of wheat leaves under cadmium stress.
TreatmentsChlorophyll a
(mg g−1)
Chlorophyll b
(mg g−1)
Chlorophyll a+b
(mg g−1)
Chlorophyll a/b Total Carotenoid
(mg g−1)
Control (ck)2.43 ± 0.02 e0.81 ± 0.017 d3.24 ± 0.037 e3.01 ± 0.039 cd0.17 ± 0.003 c
Cadmium (Cd)2.32 ± 0.01 f0.60 ± 0.020 g2.92 ± 0.015 f3.85 ± 0.013 a0.13 ± 0.004 e
Boron (B)2.79 ± 0.01 b0.96 ± 0.011 b3.75 ± 0.025 b2.89 ± 0.027 d0.20 ± 0.002 b
Biochar (Bc)2.75 ± 0.02 b0.86 ± 0.006 c3.61 ± 0.017 c3.21 ± 0.050 c0.18 ± 0.003 c
B+Bc2.97 ± 0.03 a1.03 ± 0.008 a4.00 ± 0.023 a2.87 ± 0.055 d0.22 ± 0.002 a
Cd+B2.54 ± 0.02 d0.72 ± 0.006 ef3.26 ± 0.026 e3.53 ± 0.015 b0.15 ± 0.001 d
Cd+Bc2.53 ± 0.02 d0.70 ± 0.008 f3.23 ± 0.027 e3.63 ± 0.027 b0.15 ± 0.001 d
Cd+B+Bc2.66 ± 0.01 c0.74 ± 0.004 e3.39 ± 0.011 d3.61 ± 0.030 b0.16 ± 0.002 d
LSD ≤ 0.010.0790.0380.0900.2030.010
Different small letters in the column indicated that the means are significantly different from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 2. Influence of the individual and combined applications of boron and biochar on the enzymatic antioxidants of wheat leaves under cadmium stress.
Table 2. Influence of the individual and combined applications of boron and biochar on the enzymatic antioxidants of wheat leaves under cadmium stress.
TreatmentsSuperoxide Dismutase (Unit mg−1 Protein)Catalase
(Unit mg−1 Protein)
Peroxidase
(Unit mg−1 Protein)
Ascorbate Peroxidase (Unit mg−1 Protein)
Control (ck)76.50 ± 1.28 g9.38 ± 0.17 d6.50 ± 0.117 d0.94 ± 0.051 d
Cadmium (Cd)123.60 ± 2.73 d15.02 ± 0.14 b9.30 ± 0.098 c1.79 ± 0.048 c
Boron (B)89.53 ± 2.45 f11.31 ± 0.44 c7.38 ± 0.061 d1.02 ± 0.024 d
Biochar (Bc)94.55 ± 1.57 f10.28 ± 0.57 cd7.03 ± 0.070 d1.04 ± 0.027 d
B+Bc105.27 ± 2.58 e10.67 ± 0.14 cd6.97 ± 0.052 d1.12 ± 0.046 d
Cd+B178.01 ± 2.29 b16.34 ± 0.31 b11.67 ± 0.149 a2.20 ± 0.069 b
Cd+Bc163.47 ± 3.03 c15.33 ± 0.72 b10.67 ± 0.167 b1.93 ± 0.023 c
Cd+B+Bc187.35 ± 1.23 a18.65 ± 0.21 a12.33 ± 0.147 a2.53 ± 0.028 a
LSD ≤ 0.017.731.440.8910.199
Different small letters in the column indicated that the means are significantly different from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 3. The influence of the individual and combined applications of boron and biochar on hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde content, electrolyte leakage, and soluble protein of wheat leaves under cadmium stress.
Table 3. The influence of the individual and combined applications of boron and biochar on hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde content, electrolyte leakage, and soluble protein of wheat leaves under cadmium stress.
TreatmentsHydrogen Peroxide
(µmol g−1)
Malondialdehyde Content
(µmol g−1)
Electrolyte Leakage
(%)
Soluble Protein
(mgg−1fw)
Control (ck)21.34 ± 0.88 g12.69 ± 0.30 e35.77 ± 0.75 d8.89 ± 0.42 a
Cadmium (Cd)49.77 ± 0.83 a26.38 ± 0.68 a78.93 ± 0.89 a2.05 ± 0.05 c
Boron (B)27.90 ± 0.54 ef10.65 ± 0.65 f28.86 ± 1.97 e9.22 ± 0.65 a
Biochar (Bc)25.66 ± 0.29 f11.63 ± 0.27 ef30.62 ± 0.59 de10.37 ± 0.10 a
B+Bc29.29 ± 1.15 df12.15 ± 0.19 ef27.26 ± 1.10 e10.30 ± 0.68 a
Cd+B40.47 ± 0.79 b18.50 ± 0.41 c57.63 ± 2.02 b3.90 ± 0.27 b
Cd+Bc36.00 ± 0.57 c22.22 ± 0.33 b62.14 ± 2.19 b4.10 ± 0.08 b
Cd+B+Bc32.38 ± 0.64 d15.57 ± 0.40 d48.53 ± 0.63 c5.52 ± 0.12 b
LSD ≤ 0.013.241.855.891.72
Different small letters in the column indicated that the means are significantly different from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. The influence of individual and combined applications of boron and biochar on the osmo-protectants of wheat leaves under cadmium stress.
Table 4. The influence of individual and combined applications of boron and biochar on the osmo-protectants of wheat leaves under cadmium stress.
TreatmentsFree Proline
(mg g−1)
Soluble Sugar
(mg g−1)
Total Phenolic
(µmol g−1)
Control (ck)12.26 ± 0.052 d7.50 ± 0.45 cd4.79 ± 0.17 bc
Cadmium (Cd)19.76 ± 0.015 c4.80 ± 0.20 e2.93 ± 0.50 d
Boron (B)13.20 ± 0.258 d8.47 ± 0.37 bc5.64 ± 0.32 ab
Biochar (Bc)13.03 ± 0.619 d9.59 ± 0.11 ab6.28 ± 0.41 a
B+Bc14.21 ± 0.648 d9.92 ± 0.30 a6.22 ± 0.55 a
Cd+B23.68 ± 0.787 ab6.91 ± 0.05 d3.99 ± 0.15 cd
Cd+Bc21.59 ± 0.799 bc7.07 ± 0.19 d3.74 ± 0.06 cd
Cd+B+Bc25.04 ± 0.272 a7.39 ± 0.56 cd3.93 ± 0.06 cd
LSD ≤ 0.012.301.251.15
Different small letters in the column indicated that the means are significantly different from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hussain, S.; Irfan, M.; Sattar, A.; Hussain, S.; Ullah, S.; Abbas, T.; Ur-Rehman, H.; Nawaz, F.; Al-Hashimi, A.; Elshikh, M.S.; et al. Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Wheat through the Combined Application of Boron and Biochar via Regulating Morpho-Physiological and Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms. Agronomy 2022, 12, 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020434

AMA Style

Hussain S, Irfan M, Sattar A, Hussain S, Ullah S, Abbas T, Ur-Rehman H, Nawaz F, Al-Hashimi A, Elshikh MS, et al. Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Wheat through the Combined Application of Boron and Biochar via Regulating Morpho-Physiological and Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms. Agronomy. 2022; 12(2):434. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020434

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hussain, Sajjad, Muhammad Irfan, Abdul Sattar, Shabir Hussain, Sami Ullah, Tahira Abbas, Haseeb Ur-Rehman, Farukh Nawaz, Abdulrahman Al-Hashimi, Mohamed S. Elshikh, and et al. 2022. "Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Wheat through the Combined Application of Boron and Biochar via Regulating Morpho-Physiological and Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms" Agronomy 12, no. 2: 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020434

APA Style

Hussain, S., Irfan, M., Sattar, A., Hussain, S., Ullah, S., Abbas, T., Ur-Rehman, H., Nawaz, F., Al-Hashimi, A., Elshikh, M. S., Cheema, M., & Yang, J. (2022). Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Wheat through the Combined Application of Boron and Biochar via Regulating Morpho-Physiological and Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms. Agronomy, 12(2), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020434

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop