Next Article in Journal
Variability in Early Seed Development of 26 Populations of Cuscuta campestris Yunck.: The Significance of Host, Seed Age, Morphological Trait, Light, Temperature, and Genetic Variance
Previous Article in Journal
Advantage of Multiple Pods and Compound Leaf in Kabuli Chickpea under Heat Stress Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/agronomy12030558
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Occurrence of Fungal Diseases in Maize in Organic Farming Versus an Integrated Management System

by
Diana Czarnecka
1,*,
Anna Czubacka
1,
Monika Agacka-Mołdoch
1,
Anna Trojak-Goluch
1 and
Jerzy Księżak
2
1
Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation—State Research Institute, Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland
2
Department of Forage Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation—State Research Institute, Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(3), 558; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030558
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 18 February 2022 / Accepted: 21 February 2022 / Published: 23 February 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Organic farming is becoming increasingly popular because it leads to healthier products. Due to limitations on the use of chemical protection, however, plants may be more susceptible to pathogen attacks. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the occurrence of fungal diseases in maize grown in organic versus integrated systems. The field experiment was conducted during the years 2017–2019 in Puławy, Poland. Three maize varieties, Ambrosini, Smolitop and Ricardinio, were cultivated in two fields with a different crop production system. The incidence of fungal diseases, such as northern corn leaf blight, eyespot, common corn rust, corn smut and Fusarium ear rot, was assessed. Fungal isolates were collected from leaves and cobs with disease symptoms and identified microscopically and molecularly. In both cultivation systems, northern corn leaf blight and eyespot were the most common, while corn rust and fusariosis were seen more often in organic cultivation. Alternaria alternata, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium poae, Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium sporotrichioides were the fungal species most frequently detected in the two systems. Additionally, Fusarium verticillioides was common in the organic system. Weather conditions, especially heavy rainfall and high air humidity, greatly influenced the incidence of such diseases.

1. Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) is widely used in agriculture and the food industry all over the world, including Poland. Grain and maize silage are used mainly as feed in livestock production. In 2018, over 1.2 million hectares of maize were cultivated in Poland, of which 645,000 were allocated for grain production and 601,000 for silage [1]. Corn is also processed into a wide variety of food and industrial products.
The corn market is one of the most dynamically developing agricultural markets. This is due to the versatility of the use of corn. It is a spring crop, very tolerant to precropping, which in Polish conditions is gradually replacing winter crops after frost. In the south, southwest and west of Poland, varieties are grown for grain much later than in other regions of the country. To the contrary, in northern Poland, much earlier varieties with a lower yield potential are grown. When maize is used for silage, slightly later varieties are chosen, which are characterised by higher productivity in both grain yield and green matter per hectare [2].
Most of the plantations are exposed to a variety of infections, of which fungal ones are very frequent. The most common fungal foliar diseases in maize observed in Poland are: northern corn leaf blight caused by Exserohilum turcicum (syn. Helminthosporium turcicum (Pass.) K.J. Leonard & Suggs), eyespot caused by the fungus Kabatiella zeae Narita & Y. Hirats (syn. Aureobasidium zeae (Narita & Y. Hirats) Dingley) and common corn rust caused by an infection by Puccinia sorghi Schwein [3]. The lesions caused by these fungi may become so numerous that the maize leaves are destroyed, leading to loss of yield due to lack of available carbohydrates in the grains [3].
Additionally, the occurrence of common smut caused by the fungus Ustilago maydis (DC.) Corda (syn. Ustilago zeae (Link) Unger) and head smut caused by Sphacelotheca reiliana Kühn was observed on maize fields in Poland [3]. All these infections, however, rarely result in financial loss.
Moreover, there are several fungal pathogens that cause ear and kernel rots in corn that may reduce yield and grain quality. A quite common disease in Poland is red ear rot, caused by Fusarium graminearum Schwabe. Another disease for cobs is Fusarium ear rot, also known as pink ear rot, caused by several Fusarium species, the most common of which include Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg (syn. F. moniliforme Sheldon) and Fusarium proliferatum (Matsushima) Nirenberg [4]. Among other fungal diseases for maize, Fusarium ear rot is crucial for the quantity and quality of grain products used in human and animal nutrition [5,6]. The Fusarium species produce metabolites called mycotoxins, which contaminate human food and animal feed as well as cause disorders of the digestive system and kidney and liver functions [7,8,9,10]. The most common mycotoxins produced by several toxigenic Fusarium species are deoxynivalenol, trichothecenes, zearalenone, fumonisins and moniliformin [11,12].
The severity of fungal infections in maize production is largely dependent on environmental conditions (weather, temperature, wind, rain) as well as the choice of cultural practice (no till/minimum till, corn-on-corn rotation, elimination of weed infestation) and farming system (organic or integrated). The susceptibility of varieties used for breeding also plays a significant role [3,12,13,14].
Maize can be grown in both integrated and organic systems [15,16]. The organic cultivation of plants reduces the costs of cultivation and is becoming increasingly popular among Polish farmers [17,18].
Organic farming is a farming system consisting of balanced crop and livestock production within the farm. It relies on the use of correct crop rotation and other natural methods to maintain or enhance biological activity and soil fertility, as well as on the selection of plant species, varieties and animal breeds, taking into account their natural resistance to disease. Organic farming not only plays an important role in producing pesticide-free food, but also enhances and maintains the biodiversity and natural values of agricultural production spaces. It also increases employment in rural areas through the amount of work needed to produce organic products [19]. In an integrated cultivation system, the use of plant protection products is allowed if the level of presence of the pest exceeds the harmfulness threshold. In contrast, the organic system excludes chemical plant protection products against pests and pathogens, and weeds are controlled mechanically.
Meanwhile, modern hybrid varieties of maize, adapted to more intensive growing conditions, may show less resistance to fungal diseases under less than optimal cultivation conditions. For this reason, it is necessary to assess maize varieties in terms of their suitability for organic cultivation.
The aim of the study was to assess fungal infection in maize grown in organic and integrated farming systems between the years 2017 and 2019. In addition, the species composition of fungi within the genus Fusarium and the incidence of Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler in both systems of cultivation were analysed. Moreover, the study also includes a comparison of three maize varieties as regards their response to fungal pathogens in order to indicate which varieties can be recommended for cultivation in the organic system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Conditions of Experiment

The experiment was conducted in the Osiny Experimental Station of the Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation—State Research Institute in Puławy, Lubelskie Voivodeship, Poland (51°27′ N, 22°03′ E). One early maize variety, Ambrosini (KWS), and two mid-early varieties, Smolitop (HR Smolice) and Ricardinio (KWS) (Table 1), were cultivated in two fields using different farming systems: organic and integrated [20]. Each variety was grown in four replications that together covered an area of 1500 m2. The plot size for each variety was 375 m2. In organic farming, plants were fertilised with composted manure (40 t/ha) and weeds were mechanically restricted. Meanwhile, in integrated farming, both manure (30 t/ha) and mineral fertilisation: 150 kg/ha N (CH4N2O), 39.2 kg/ha P (Ca(H2PO4)2) and 49.8 kg/ha K (KCl), were applied. Moreover, in integrated cropping, the seeds were treated before sowing with a fungicide containing the following active substances: fludioxonil–25 g/L and metalaxyl-M–9.7 g/L (Maxim XL 034.7 FS), and weeds were controlled with herbicides containing sulcotrione (Shado 300 SC–1 L/ha) and nicosulfuron (Innovate 250 EC–0.2 L/ha). The experiment extended over three years (2017–2019).

2.2. Meteorological Data

During the growing season, in the period from April to the end of August, the mean air temperature, total rainfall and relative air humidity were recorded by an automatic weather station placed near the experimental site.

2.3. Observation of Disease Symptoms and Sampling for Research

The disease symptoms were observed in the second half of August on one hundred randomly selected plants from each farming system and each variety. The range of leaf and cob damage caused by fungal pathogens was determined using a 0–9 point scale, where 0 indicated no disease symptoms, 5 indicated that 10–15% of the leaf area or cobs (in the case of Fusarium) was affected by lesions, and 9 indicated that more than 50% of the leaf area or cob surface was covered by symptoms. The other degrees of the scale denoted intermediate symptoms. In order to monitor the fungal species present in plantations, leaf fragments and cobs with mould symptoms were collected from 49 corn plants (135 samples) from the organic system and 39 plants (103 samples) from the integrated system.
In the case of common smut, the percentage of plants infected by U. maydis was determined.

2.4. Decontamination of Plant Material and Obtaining Pure Cultures of Fungi

Leaf fragments and grains with symptoms of fungal disease were rinsed under tap water for 20 min and surface-disinfected in 70% ethanol (30 s). Afterwards, they were disinfected for 2–3 min in a 4% sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl; 7.4 g/mol) and rinsed three times in distilled water. Next, the plant material was dried on sterile filter paper, placed on half-concentrated potato dextrose agar (Potato Dextrose Agar Difco, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) in Petri dishes, supplemented with 2.5 mg/L chlortetracycline (tetracycline hydrochloride, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 25 °C in darkness. After 3–4 days, the mycelial hyphae that had grown from the leaf fragments or grains of maize were transferred to a fresh medium. These transfers were repeated several times until pure, homogeneous fungal isolates were obtained. The microscopic identification of isolates was performed using the Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope and taxonomic keys [21,22].

2.5. Fungal Species Identification

Representative fungal isolates morphologically different from each other in terms of growth rate, colour and mycelial structure were selected for DNA isolation. For this, small fragments of mycelium were scraped off the surface of the medium and were then collected into 2 mL sterile Eppendorf tubes with sterile homogenisation beads. Homogenisation was performed for 3 min at 30 Hz in a homogeniser (Tissue Lyser II, Qiagen Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany). The fungal genomic DNA was isolated using a modified CTAB method [23]. An extraction buffer with the following composition was used: 3% v/v CTAB, 100 mM Tris-base, 20 mM EDTA and 1.4 M NaCl (pH = 8).
After extraction, the DNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). PCR was performed using various sets of primers obtained from the literature and designed for A. alternata and the genus Fusarium, including the following species: F. oxysporum, F. poae, F. culmorum, F. graminearum, F. sporotrichioides, F. proliferatum, F. equiseti, F. avenaceum and F. solani. The PCR reaction mixture in a volume of 20 µL contained: 1 × PCR buffer (75 mM Tris-HCl (pH = 8.8), 20 mM (NH4)2SO4, 0.01% (v/v) Tween 20), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each nucleotide, 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltic UAB, Vilnius, Lithuania), 0.5 mM of selected primers and 20 ng of genomic DNA. Fragments of DNA were amplified using C1000 and S1000 thermocyclers (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The primer sequences and temperature profiles used for the identification of genus Fusarium and individual species are given in Table 2. DNA extracted from fungal isolates obtained from the Pathogen Bank (at the Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Poznań, Poland) was used as positive and negative controls.
After amplification, the PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel in 1 × TBE buffer with ethidium bromide. The presence and length of the PCR products were assessed through observation under UV light and comparison with a size standard (GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder, Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltic UAB, Vilnius, Lithuania).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was run with Statistica 13.3. The percentage of plants infected with U. maydis was subjected to angular transformation [34]. Statistically significant differences were calculated using the ANOVA analysis of variance. The analysis of variance was performed at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
In turn, as the degree of infestation by other pathogens was determined on an ordinal scale (0–9), the statistical analysis was run with the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests showing significant differences in maize infestation between the two cultivation systems and three tested varieties, respectively. The value p ≤ 0.05 was assumed for these tests.

3. Results

3.1. Weather Conditions

The mean air temperature, total rainfall and relative air humidity during the growing seasons from 2017 to 2019 are presented in Table 3. In the vegetative season from April to August 2017, total rainfall was 400 mm, in 2018 it was 277.5 mm and in 2019 it amounted to 280.9 mm. In 2017 and 2018, the highest rainfall occurred in July (119.6 mm and 122.5 mm, respectively), while the month with the highest rainfall in 2019 was August (86.7 mm). The mean air temperature during the growing season was the following: 15.5 °C in 2017, 18.1 °C in 2018 and 16.6 °C in 2019. The weather data show that the years in question were similar in terms of thermal conditions, whilst 2017 was different from 2018 and 2019 in terms of precipitation. It is worth noting that relative air humidity in 2018 was higher (70.6%) than in other years (53.8% in 2017 and 52.12% in 2019).

3.2. The Influence of the Cultivation System on the Incidence of Fungal Disease

The rate of fungal disease incidence in the two cultivation systems is presented in Table 4. The highest number of plants with symptoms of fungal disease was recorded in 2018 for both maize management systems. In turn, in 2017 and 2019, the lowest number of plants with disease symptoms was observed for the integrated system. Overall, northern corn leaf blight and eyespot dominated in both cultivation systems. The mean degree of infection by E. turcicum in 2018 was 5.63 in maize grown in the organic system and 6.59 in the integrated system. Infection with K. zeae in 2018 was more frequent in the organic system (where the mean degree of infestation was 5.38) than in the integrated one.
The highest mean degree of corn cob infection by Fusarium species was observed in the integrated system in 2018 (1.38). The lowest number of plants infected by the Fusarium species was observed in 2017 among plants grown in the integrated system, where the mean degree of infestation was 0.30.
Common corn rust was shown to be a negligible problem in the tested fields. The severity of common corn rust was greater in the organic maize growing system, but the difference between management systems was shown to be statistically significant only in 2017. The greatest infestation was recorded in 2018 on the organic farm.
All three varieties under the organic system were more severely affected by eyespot than in integrated farming (Table 5). In addition, common corn rust was more prevalent in plants of the Ricardinio and Smolitop varieties cultivated according to organic farming. In contrast to the other varieties, the level of common rust infestation in the Ambrosini variety was low regardless of the cropping system. The rest of the fungal diseases affected the tested varieties at a similar level, and no statistical differences were reported (Table 5 and Table 6).

3.3. Northern Corn Leaf Blight

The greatest severity of the disease was observed in 2018 in both organic and integrated farming systems (Table 4). In 2019, the organic standards applied in the cultivation of maize resulted in a higher degree of infection of plants by E. turcicum than was noted in the field under integrated cultivation (5.07 and 3.84, respectively). The mean degree of plant infestation was the lowest in 2017 in the organic field and amounted to only 2.23. In both 2017 and 2018, the Ambrosini variety cultivated according to organic methods reacted with the highest degree of infestation (Figure 1). This variety, however, was also shown to be susceptible to E. turcicum in the integrated management system. Meanwhile, Smolitop was the least affected, with the exception of the 2019 organic yields.

3.4. Eyespot

The pathogen causing this disease demonstrated the highest degree of infection in 2018 in both organic and integrated systems (5.38 and 4.21, respectively). In 2019, the mean degree of plant infestation in the organic system was also high, at 2.41 (Table 4). The maize varieties used in the experiment were susceptible to infection at an almost equal degree in both growing systems. The Ricardinio variety grown in the integrated system, however, was the least affected by the fungus K. zeae in 2019 (Figure 2).

3.5. Common Corn Rust

The appearance of P. sorghi on corn plantations in 2017–2019 was not extensive. The severity of infection observed was greater in organic farming than in integrated systems. In 2018, the mean degree of plant infection by P. sorghi amounted to 0.59 in organic farming, while in integrated cultivation, it was 0.46 (Table 4). The Smolitop corn variety proved to be the most susceptible to P. sorghi infection (Figure 3).

3.6. Fusarium Ear Rot and Red Ear Rot

Fusarium ear rot and red ear rot are diseases caused by fungi of the genus Fusarium. In the years 2017 and 2019, cob fusariosis was more prominent in the corn plantation managed by the organic system than in the integrated one (Table 4). In 2018, the highest mean degree of corn cob infection was observed in the integrated system (1.38). There was no infection of maize cobs of the Ricardinio variety by any Fusarium species in the integrated system in 2019 (Figure 4).

3.7. Corn Smut

In both growing systems, U. maydis attacked individual plants. No statistically significant differences were found between cultivation methods or among years (Figure 5, Table 6). In the organic system, the percentage of plants with smut was the highest in 2018 (7.07%; Figure 5). In the organic system, Smolitop was the most affected by U. maydis among the tested maize cultivars. In 2019, however, corn smut was significantly more prevalent in the integrated system (14.28% of plants were infected), with Smolitop being the worst affected while the percentage of infected plants belonging to the varieties Ambrosini and Ricardinio was 6 and 8%, respectively.

3.8. Fungi Isolated from Infected Maize Plants

Maize plants were colonised by both pathogenic and saprotrophic fungi. A total of 172 fungal isolates were obtained in the organic cropping system (Table 7) and 147 isolates of fungi (Table 8) from plants cultivated in the integrated system between 2017 and 2019. In 2018, the highest number of fungal isolates were obtained from infected maize leaves and cobs in both farming systems (83 and 66 respectively). A. alternate and Fusarium spp. fungi were isolated from the tested samples. The predominant genus identified in organic maize was A. alternata (51.2% of isolates) followed by Fusarium (48.8%; Table 7). In contrast, the predominant genus isolated from the integrated system was Fusarium (64.7% of isolates), followed by A. alternata (35.4%). From maize cultivated in organic farming, we obtained fungi from the genus Alternaria, represented by the A. alternata (51.2% of isolates), and the genus Fusarium, represented by the following species: F. oxysporum (22.1%; Figure 6 and Figure 7), F. verticillioides (2.9%), F. graminearum (2.3%), F. poae (2.3%), F. sporotrichioides (1.2%), F. avenaceum (0.6%) and other Fusarium spp. that have not been classified (17.4%).
The dominant species, A. alternata (35.4% of isolates) and F. oxysporum (23.1%), F. poae (10.9%) and F. graminearum (6.1%), in more often colonised maize cultivated in integrated farms (Table 8).

4. Discussion

In the present study, the highest incidence of fungal diseases in maize in both cropping systems was observed in 2018, when heavy rainfall and high relative humidity were recorded, especially in the second ten-day period of July and in August. It is probable that the high air humidity and the difference in the amount of precipitation between July and August had an impact on the frequency and occurrence of fungal diseases in maize plantations. This could explain the presence of E. turcicum infections in both maize systems in 2018 because it thrives during periods of moderate (temperature between 20 and 28 °C), wet and humid weather [35]. In 2017, rainfalls were also plentiful but short in duration and limited to the second ten-day period of the month. Meanwhile, in July 2018, rainfalls were more regular, which resulted in high relative humidity persisting for a long time. Such weather conditions favoured the spread of fungal diseases. It is possible that the influence of humidity was so great that it nullified the importance of other factors. Simultaneously, in 2018, a high yield of seeds was recorded by Księżak [20], which means that fungal infestation did not reduce the yield. In our study, maize grown in 2019 in the organic system had a higher rate of fungal disease infestation. This can be related to the high amount of rainfall in August, when the samples were collected, and is also confirmed by the Księżak study [20], where it is recorded that the 2019 maize yield was lower in organic farming, perhaps as a result of the fungal infestation. According to Księżak [20], the maize varieties studied (Ambrosini, Sylvestre, Smolitop and Ricardinio), which were grown in the integrated system in 2017–2019, yielded on average 12.1% more seeds than those grown in the organic system.
The greatest differences in northern corn leaf blight and eyespot infestation emerged in 2019, when the relatively dry July and August weather was not very conducive to the development of fungal infections. In this case, the average degree of plant infection was distinctly higher in the organic cultivation system. The year 2019 was also marked by a clear difference in yields, which were lower in the case of plantations managed according to organic cultivation rules [20].
In 2017–2019, F. oxysporum, F. verticillioides, F. graminearum and F. poae were the most frequent Fusarium species isolated from maize cultivated in both organic and integrated systems. There are many reports on climate change determining Fusarium species population variability and F. verticillioides distribution in Central European countries [8,36,37]. Numerous studies confirm that moderate temperatures and a high level of moisture increase the infection rates of fungal diseases, especially the Fusarium species [8,14,38,39,40]. Red ear rot is caused by infections with F. graminearum, F. culmorum and F. avenaceum during periods of moderate temperatures and high humidity [40,41], while pink ear rot, induced by pathogens such as F. verticillioides, F. proliferatum and F. temperatum, has often been reported in southern regions of Europe where it was dry and warm [42].
Fungi of the genus Fusarium do not exist in isolation but compete with other microorganisms for niches in soil, plant debris and host plants. Their interactions and the balance between microbial communities are influenced by the prevailing environmental conditions. Temperature, water availability (aw), aeration and light are key climatic factors influencing the production of Fusarium inoculum. Marín et al. [43,44] showed that temperature and aw significantly influence the growth and interaction between F. moniliforme and F. proliferatum and among F. graminearum, F. subglutinans, F. proliferatum, Aspergillus, Penicillium and Trichoderma species. According to Fadiji et al. [45], organic farming has a direct impact on the diversity, functions and abundance of soil microbial communities and, thus, may be associated with improved yield, growth, enhanced plant resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses as well as improved soil health.
The predominant genus identified in organic maize was Alternaria, but fungi from the Fusarium genus were most commonly isolated from the integrated system. There are many reports in the literature comparing organic and conventional maize with wheat cultivation systems for the incidence of mycotoxin-producing fungi [46,47,48]. Ariño et al. [46] produced similar results to ours by obtaining more isolates of Alternaria fungi in organic cultivation. They reported that organic maize showed a higher total fungal incidence but lower contamination of kernels compared to conventional maize. It is possible that the higher number of Alternaria isolates in the organic system is related to the higher incidence of weeds, since herbicides as well as fungicides are prohibited in this type of growing. In our study, the sampling date in August coincided with the optimal period for Alternaria spores, which is July–August. Furthermore, Alternaria spores are more prevalent in manure-fertilised soils. Similarly, Lazzaro et al. [48] observed that contamination by Fusarium spp. was higher in conventional than in organic wheat. Bernhoft et al. [47] also found a significantly higher incidence of Fusarium spp. occurring in conventional Norwegian cereals, including wheat, compared to organic crops. The increased frequency of the presence of Fusarium fungi in conventional cereal crops, including wheat, may be due to the use of ineffective pesticides against Fusarium and mineral fertilisation. The intensive application of fungicides on cereals has selected for resistance in many cereal pathogens. Talas and McDonald [49] conducted studies on the fungicide resistance of F. graminearum isolates in a field population. Additionally, in the study by Yin et al., tebuconazole resistance was found in 1 isolate among 41 Chinese F. graminearum isolates collected from 14 different locations [50]. The main factors differentiating between conventional and organic farming are the use of pesticides to protect plants against pathogens and mineral fertilisation. Many studies are, thus, available on this subject [51,52,53]. Research conducted by Henriksen and Elen [52] found that large amounts of nitrogen fertiliser applied to wheat resulted in increased crop densities and a change in the canopy microclimate, which caused high moisture content and, therefore, more favourable conditions for the emergence of Fusarium infection. In addition, Szulc et al. [54] found that the highest infestation of corn plants by Fusarium fungi occurred when broadcast seeding of NP fertiliser was applied. In contrast, the lowest plant infestation was observed when in-row sowing of NP fertiliser was applied at a depth of 15 cm.
Comparing the results of the above studies, however, it should be stated that, in general, organic maize cultivation is more exposed to attacks from fungal pathogens, primarily because the use of chemical plant protection products, in particular insecticides, is prohibited in this system. Mazzoni et al. [55] demonstrated the effectiveness of insecticides in reducing the infection of maize cobs by larvae. In addition, according to numerous reports, foraging by the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) and western corn borer (Diabrotica virgifera) in corn-growing areas promotes the spread of fungal diseases and, especially, the development of cob fusariosis [56,57,58,59]. In Szulc’s study, it was shown that as damage to maize plants due to O. nubilalis increased, infestation by fungi of the genus Fusarium spp. also increased [60]. Mechanical damage caused by insect feeding allows the fungal pathogens to penetrate more easily into plant tissues. In the present study, we also observed a relationship between the occurrence of European corn borer larvae and the greater intensity of cob infestation by fungi of the genus Fusarium in organic farming. Further analyses, however, were not conducted to confirm this fact.
Out of the three studied varieties, Ambrosini seems to be the best suited to organic cultivation. Only in the case of eyespot was this variety infected to a significantly greater degree under organic conditions than in the integrated system. In terms of the rest of the diseases, Ambrosini performed comparably in both cultivation systems. The Ricardinio variety turned out to be relatively resistant to fusariosis and rust, in contrast to Smolitop. The latter variety was also characterised by low seed yield, as well as seed weight and number of grains per cob [20]. These differences, however, are rather a result of the genetic diversity and yielding abilities among the varieties. Nevertheless, the low yield of Smolitop may also be the result of its greater susceptibility to fungal diseases.
The use of appropriate agricultural practices in the cultivation of maize in either an organic or integrated manner contributes to the occurrence or reduction of fungal infections. In an organic system, tilling the soil between crops is necessary as a weed control technique because the use of herbicides is prohibited. It is clear that the most important inoculum sources for Fusarium spp. are plant debris and, especially, maize stalks. This is confirmed by many studies [38,61,62]. Vasileiadis et al. [62] showed that, after conventional ploughing, the incidence of F. graminearum, F. temperatum and F. culmorum was reduced, while the incidence of F. verticillioides and F. equiseti was enhanced by tillage. Steinkellner et al. [63], however, reported that the composition of Fusarium species is different depending on the soil layer and survival structures of the species. According to Nyvall and Kommedahl [64], F. verticillioides has the ability to survive in maize stalks at a depth of 30 cm due to higher soil moisture and poor decomposition of plant tissue. In our study, the incidence of F. vertocillioides was noted in 2018 when the abundance of rainfall and air humidity was relatively high. Therefore, conditions favourable for the survival of the pathogen in harvest residues were present.
Conversely, there are relatively few studies on the occurrence of fungal diseases in maize in both organic and integrated systems. In integrated pest management, mineral fertilisation and chemical plant protection agents are used if the threshold of financial losses by pathogens or pests is exceeded. Such a practice limits the use of chemical plant protection products to the necessary minimum, thus reducing pressure on the natural environment and protecting the biodiversity of the agricultural environment. In our study on integrated maize cultivation, fungicides and insecticides were not used because the incidence of pathogenic fungi and pests did not exceed the thresholds of harmfulness. Therefore, our study did not include one of the factors that differentiate organic and integrated systems.
Taking the above into account, it is difficult to relate the results of our research to the existing literature comparing organic systems of cultivation with conventional ones. Therefore, there is a need to continue research on the incidence of fungal diseases on maize plants grown under organic and integrated systems in conditions prevalent in Poland. Moreover, the study should be extended to include other observations, for example the presence of mycotoxins in maize seed from plantations managed according to both farming methods.

5. Conclusions

A large amount of rainfall and high air humidity, especially in the second ten-day period of July and in August 2018, created favourable conditions for the development of fungal diseases in maize. This resulted in the highest severity of fungal disease on the evaluated corn varieties, regardless of the cropping system used. The clearest differences in infestation with fungal disease in the two cultivation systems emerged in 2019, which was characterised by a relatively dry summer. At that time, corn cultivated on the organic farm showed the highest susceptibility to disease. This was probably due to the greater weed infestation in the organic system and the use of a higher rate of composted manure. High plant density caused by weed infestation created a specific microclimate and thus promoted the incidence of fungal diseases. The obtained results have shown that, in terms of the occurrence of fungal diseases in maize, the organic system does not do remarkably worse than the integrated one. Only in years with weather conditions conducive to disease the integrated system outperformed organic farming. On this basis, it can be concluded that in dry years (with an average amount of precipitation lower than the multi-year data), in order to protect plants from fungal diseases, it is advisable to apply agricultural practices characteristic of the integrated farming system.
Moreover, earliness of a variety can play a role in plant disease susceptibility. The early varieties, such as Ambrosini, better tolerate cultivation in the organic system, while later-maturing ones, such as mid-early Smolitop, seem to be less suited for these conditions.
The study showed that the most common fungal diseases were northern corn leaf blight and eyespot, which caused high infestation in both organic and integrated cropping systems, while corn rust and fusariosis were more common in the organic system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.C. and A.C.; methodology: D.C., A.C., M.A.-M. and A.T.-G.; software: D.C. and A.C.; validation: J.K. and A.T.-G.; formal analysis: D.C., A.C., A.T.-G. and J.K.; investigation: D.C., A.C., M.A.-M. and A.T.-G.; resources: J.K.; data curation: D.C., A.C. and M.A.-M.; writing—original draft preparation: D.C.; writing—review and editing: D.C. and A.C.; visualization: D.C. and A.C.; supervision: A.C. and J.K.; project administration: A.C.; funding acquisition: A.C. and J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Tomasz Jóźwicki from the Department of Agrometeorology and Applied Informatics, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation—State Research Institute, Puławy, Poland for providing the meteorological data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. GUS (Central Statistical Office of Poland). Production of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops in 2018. Warsaw. 2019. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo/uprawy-rolne-i-ogrodnicze/produkcja-upraw-rolnych-i-ogrodniczych-w-2018-roku,9,17.html (accessed on 5 October 2020).
  2. Stachowicz, T. Organically Grown Maize: Uprawa Kukurydzy Metodami Ekologicznymi; Agricultural Advisory Centre in Brwinów: Radom, Poland, 2018; ISBN 978-83-63411-78-7. Available online: https://www.cdr.gov.pl/images/Radom/2019/wydaw/5_kukurydza_int.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2021).
  3. Strunk, C.L.; Byamukama, E. Corn diseases in South Dakota and their management. Chapter 47. In iGrow Corn: Best Management Practices; Clay, D.E., Carlson, C.G., Clay, S.A., Byamukama, E., Eds.; South Dakota State University: Brookings, SD, USA, 2016; Available online: https://extension.sdstate.edu/sites/default/files/2019-09/S-0003-47-Corn.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2021).
  4. Schiwek, S.; Beule, L.; Vinas, M.; Pfordt, A.; von Tiedemann, A.; Karlovsky, P. High-resolution melting (HRM) curve assay for the identification of eight Fusarium species causing ear rot in maize. Pathogens 2020, 9, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Munkvold, G.P. Epidemiology of Fusarium diseases and their mycotoxins in maize ears. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 109, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gromadzka, K.; Górna, K.; Chełkowski, J.; Waśkiewicz, A. Mycotoxins and related Fusarium species in preharvest maize ear rot in Poland. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 62, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Czembor, E.; Stępień, Ł.; Waśkiewicz, A. Fusarium temperatum as a new species causing ear rot on maize in Poland. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Czembor, E.; Stępień, Ł.; Waśkiewicz, A. Effect of environmental factors on Fusarium species and associated mycotoxins in maize grain grown in Poland. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oldenburg, E.; Höppner, F.; Ellner, F.; Weinert, J. Fusarium diseases of maize associated with mycotoxin contamination of agricultural products intended to be used for food and feed. Mycotoxin. Res. 2017, 33, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vandicke, J.; De Visschere, K.; Croubels, S.; de Saeger, S.; Audenaert, K.; Haesaert, G. Mycotoxins in Flanders’ fields: Occurrence and correlations with Fusarium species in whole-plant harvested maize. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chełkowski, J. Mycotoxins associated with corn cob fusariosis. In Fusarium-Mycotoxins, Taxonomy and Pathogenicity; Chełkowski, J., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989; pp. 53–62. [Google Scholar]
  12. Czembor, E.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Piechota, U.; Puchta, M.; Czembor, J.H.; Stępień, Ł. Differences in ear rot resistance and Fusarium verticillioides-produced fumonisin contamination between Polish currently and historically used maize inbred lines. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pascale, M.; Visconti, A.; Chełkowski, J. Ear rot susceptibility and mycotoxin contamination of maize hybrids inoculated with Fusarium species under field conditions. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2002, 108, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Doohan, F.M.; Brennan, J.; Cooke, B.M. Influence of climatic factors on Fusarium species pathogenic to cereals. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 109, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ochodzki, P.; Warzecha, R.; Żurek, M.; Grzeszczak, I. Suitability of maize cultivars for feeding cattle under organic farm conditions. Wiadomości Zootech. R. LI 2013, 3, 55–62. Available online: https://wz.izoo.krakow.pl/files/WZ_2013_3_art06.pdf (accessed on 4 September 2021).
  16. Bereś, P.K.; Mrówczyński, M.; Korbas, M.; Paradowski, A. Integrated maize protection in Poland—Current state of research and implementation. Prog. Plant Prot. 2013, 53, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  17. Księżak, J.; Staniak, M.; Bojarszczuk, J. Evaluation of yielding of maize growing in organic farming depending on cultivation method and doses of organic fertilization. J. Res. App. Agric. Eng. 2011, 56, 227–231. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bojarszczuk, J.; Księżak, J.; Staniak, M. The economic assessment of maize production depending on manure dose and cultivation method in an organic system. Acta Sci. Pol. Agric. 2013, 12, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  19. Trajer, M.; Krzyżanowska, K. Organic farming in Poland and its development potential under the Rural Development Programme for 2014–2020. J. Tour. Reg. Dev. 2017, 8, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Księżak, J. Yield evaluation of maize varieties grown for grain in the organic and integrated system. Pol. J. Agron. 2021, 45, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bernett, H.L.; Hunter, B.B. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi; APS PRESS: St. Paul, MI, USA, 1998; pp. 2–18. [Google Scholar]
  22. Leslie, J.F.; Summerell, B.A. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual; Blackwell Publishing Professional: Ames, IA, USA, 2006; pp. 1–388. [Google Scholar]
  23. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  24. Arif, M.; Chawla, S.; Zaidi, M.W.; Rayar, J.K.; Variar, M.; Singh, U.S. Development of specific primers for genus Fusarium and F. solani using rDNA sub-unit and transcription elongation factor (TEF-1α) gene. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 444–447. [Google Scholar]
  25. Turner, A.S.; Lees, A.K.; Rezanoor, H.N.; Nicholson, P. Refinement of PCR-detection of Fusarium avenaceum and evidence from DNA marker studies for phonetic relatedness to Fusarium tricinctum. Plant Pathol. 1998, 47, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nicholson, P.; Simpson, D.R.; Weston, G.; Rezanoor, H.N.; Lees, A.K.; Parry, D.W.; Joyce, D. Detection and quantification of Fusarium culmorum and Fusarium graminearum in cereals using PCR assays. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1998, 53, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jurado, M.; Vázquez, C.; Patińo, M.; González-Jaén, M.T. PCR detection assays for the trichothecene-producing species Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium poae, Fusarium equiseti and Fusarium sporotrichioides. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 28, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schilling, A.G.; Miller, E.M.; Geiger, H.H. Polymerase chain reaction-based assays for species-specific detection of Fusarium culmorum, F. graminearum and F. avenaceum. Phytopathology 1996, 86, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, P.K.; Fox, R.T.V.; Culham, A. Development of a PCR-based assay for rapid and reliable identification of pathogenic Fusaria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 218, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mule, G.; Susca, A.; Stea, G.; Moretti, A. A species-specific PCR assay based on the calmodulin partial gene for identification of Fusarium verticillioides, F. proliferatum and F. subglutinans. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Parry, D.W.; Nicholson, P. Development of PCR assay to detect Fusarium poae in wheat. Plant Pathol. 1996, 45, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kulik, T.; Fordoński, G.; Pszczółkowska, A.; Płodzień, K.; Łapiński, M. Development of PCR assay based on ITS2 rDNA polymorphism for the detection and differentiation of Fusarium sporotrichoides. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 239, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Konstantinova, P.; Bonants, P.J.M.; van Gent-Pelzer, M.P.E.; van der Zouwen, P.; van den Bulk, R. Development of specific primers for detection and identification of Alternaria spp. in carrot material by PCR and comparison with blotter and plating assays. Mycol. Res. 2001, 106, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wójcik, A.R.; Ubysz-Borucka, L.; Zieliński, W. Tablice Statystyczne. Statistical Tables; Wydawnictwo SGGW-AR: Warszawa, Poland, 1984; Volume 255. [Google Scholar]
  35. Singh, R.; Jakhar, D.S.; Kumari, R.; Kumar, P.; Lal, I. Management of Turcicum leaf blight in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Biotechnol. Crop. Sci. 2019, 8, 12–115. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dorn, B.; Forrer, H.R.; Schurch, S.; Vogelgsang, S. Fusarium species complex on maize in Switzerland: Occurrence, prevalence, impact and mycotoxins in commercial hybrids under natural infection. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 125, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Eckard, S.; Wettstein, F.E.; Forrer, H.-R.; Vogelgsang, S. Incidence of Fusarium species and mycotoxins in silage maize. Toxins 2011, 3, 949–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Pfordt, A.; Romero, L.R.; Schiwek, S.; Karlovsky, P.; von Tiedemann, A. Impact of environmental conditions and agronomic practices on the prevalence of Fusarium species associated with ear- and stalk rot in maize. Pathogens 2020, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Giorni, P.; Bertuzzi, T.; Battilani, P. Impact of fungi co-occurrence on mycotoxin contamination in maize during the growing season. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sutton, J.C. Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize ear rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1982, 4, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bottalico, A.; Perrone, G. Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with head blight in small-grain cereals in Europe. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2002, 108, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Logrieco, A.; Mul, G.; Moretti, A.; Bottalico, A. Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with maize ear rot in Europe. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2002, 108, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Marín, S.; Companys, E.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J. Effect of water activity and temperature on competing abilities of common maize fungi. Mycol. Res. 1998, 120, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marín, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J.; Vinas, I.; Magan, N. Environmental factors, in vitro interactions, and niche overlap between F. moniliforme, F. proliferatum and F. graminearum, Aspergillus, Penicillium species from maize grain. Mycol. Res. 1998, 102, 831–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fadiji, A.E.; Ayangbenro, A.S.; Babalola, O.O. Organic farming enhances the diversity and community structure of endophytic archea and fungi in maize plant: A shotgun approach. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 20, 2587–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ariño, A.; Juan, T.; Estopañan, G.; González-Cabo, J.F. Natural occurrence of Fusarium species, fumonisin production by toxigenic strains, and concentration of fumonisins B1 and B2 in conventional and organic maize grown in Spain. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bernhoft, A.; Clasen, P.E.; Kristoffersen, A.B.; Torp, M. Less Fusarium infestation and mycotoxin contamination in organic than in conventional cereals. Food Addit. Contam. 2010, 27, 842–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lazzaro, I.; Moretti, A.; Giorni, P.; Brera, C.; Battilani, P. Organic vs conventional farming: Differences in infection by mycotoxin producing fungi on maize and wheat in Northern and Central Italy. Crop. Prot. 2015, 72, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Talas, F.; McDonald, B.A. Significant variation in sensitivity to DMI fungicide in field populations of Fusarium graminearum. Plant Pathol. 2015, 64, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yin, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, B.; Ma, Z. Characterization of sterol demethylation inhibitor resistant isolates of Fusarium asiaticum and F. graminearum collected from wheat in China. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lemmens, M.; Haim, K.; Lew, H.; Ruckenbauer, P. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on Fusarium head blight development and deoxynivaleol contamination in wheat. J. Phytopathol. 2004, 152, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Henriksen, B.; Elen, O. Natural Fusarium grain infection level in wheat, barley and oat after early application of fungicides and herbicides. J. Phytopathol. 2005, 153, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Czaban, J.; Wróblewska, B.; Sułek, A.; Podolska, G. Wpływ różnych technik produkcji pszenicy ozimej na zasiedlenie jej ziarna przez grzyby z rodzaju Fusarium (The influence of different production technologies of winter wheat on colonisation of its grain by fungi of the genus Fusarium). Pol. J. Agron. 2011, 5, 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  54. Szulc, P.; Ambroży-Deręgowska, K.; Mejza, I.; Baldys, W. Wpływ glębokości aplikacji nawozu NP na zdrowotność roślin kukurydzy (Influence of fertiliser depth on maize plant health). Tech. Rol. Ogrod. Leśna 2019, 5, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mazzoni, E.; Scandolara, A.; Giorni, P.; Pietri, A.; Battilani, P. Field control of Fusarium ear rot, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) and fumonisins in maize kernels. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sobeck, E.A.; Munkvold, G.P. European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae as vectors of Fusarium moniliforme, causing kernel rot and symptomless infection of maize kernels. J. Econ. Entomol. 1999, 9, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Saladini, M.A.; Blandino, M.; Reyneri, A.; Alma, A. Impact of insecticide treatments on Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and their influence on the mycotoxin contamination of maize kernels. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2008, 64, 1170–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kurtz, B.; Karlovsky, P.; Vidal, S. Interaction between western corn rootworm (Coleoptera chrysomelidae) larvae and root -infecting Fusarium verticillioides. Environ. Entomol. 2010, 39, 1532–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Bereś, P.K.; Konefał, T. Distribution range of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.) on maize in 2004–2008 in Poland. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2010, 50, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Szulc, P. Organic and mineral fertilization of maize affecting prevalence of fusarium diseases (Fusarium spp.) and European corn borer (Ostinia nubilalis Hbn.). Prog. Plant Prot. 2013, 53, 498–502. [Google Scholar]
  61. Steinkellner, S.; Langer, I. Impact of tillage on the incidence of Fusarium spp. in soil. Plant Soil 2004, 267, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vasileiadis, V.P.; Sattin, M.; Otto, S.; Veres, A.; Pálinkás, Z.; Ban, R.; Pons, X.; Kudsk, P.; van der Weide, R.; Czembor, E.; et al. Crop protection in European maize-based cropping systems: Current practices and recommendations for innovative Integrated Pest Management. Agric. Syst. 2011, 104, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Steinkellner, S.; Shala-Mayrhofer, V.; Langer, I. Influence of tillage on Fusarium spp. in different crop rotation systems. Mycotoxin. Res. 2002, 18, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nyvall, R.F.; Kommedahl, T. Saprophytism and survival of Fusarium moniliforme in corn stalks. Phytopathology 1970, 60, 1233–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 12 00558 g001 550
Figure 1. Plant infestation (mean ± SEM) with northern corn leaf blight of three maize varieties in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems; different letters denote significant differences among varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the same year for organic (lowercase letters) and integrated (capital letters) farming, according to the Kruskal–Wallis test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1. Plant infestation (mean ± SEM) with northern corn leaf blight of three maize varieties in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems; different letters denote significant differences among varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the same year for organic (lowercase letters) and integrated (capital letters) farming, according to the Kruskal–Wallis test at p ≤ 0.05.
Agronomy 12 00558 g001
Agronomy 12 00558 g002 550
Figure 2. Plant infestation (mean ± SEM) with eyespot of three maize varieties in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems; different letters denote significant differences among varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the same year for organic (lowercase letters) and integrated (capital letters) farming, according to the Kruskal–Wallis test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2. Plant infestation (mean ± SEM) with eyespot of three maize varieties in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems; different letters denote significant differences among varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the same year for organic (lowercase letters) and integrated (capital letters) farming, according to the Kruskal–Wallis test at p ≤ 0.05.
Agronomy 12 00558 g002
Agronomy 12 00558 g003 550
Figure 3. Plant infection (mean ± SEM) with corn rust of three maize varieties in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems; different letters denote significant differences among varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the same year for organic (lowercase letters) and integrated (capital letters) farming, according to the Kruskal–Wallis test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. Plant infection (mean ± SEM) with corn rust of three maize varieties in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems; different letters denote significant differences among varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the same year for organic (lowercase letters) and integrated (capital letters) farming, according to the Kruskal–Wallis test at p ≤ 0.05.
Agronomy 12 00558 g003
Agronomy 12 00558 g004 550
Figure 4. Infestation of maize cobs (mean ± SEM) by Fusarium species of three maize varieties in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems; different letters mean significant differences among varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the same year for organic (lowercase letters) and integrated (capital letters) farming, according to the Kruskal–Wallis test at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. Infestation of maize cobs (mean ± SEM) by Fusarium species of three maize varieties in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems; different letters mean significant differences among varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the same year for organic (lowercase letters) and integrated (capital letters) farming, according to the Kruskal–Wallis test at p ≤ 0.05.
Agronomy 12 00558 g004
Agronomy 12 00558 g005 550
Figure 5. Percentage of plants with corn smut in three maize varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems. There were no significant differences among varieties within cultivation systems, according to the ANOVA analysis of variance at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5. Percentage of plants with corn smut in three maize varieties (Ambrosini, Ricardinio, Smolitop) in the years 2017–2019 in two cultivation systems. There were no significant differences among varieties within cultivation systems, according to the ANOVA analysis of variance at p ≤ 0.05.
Agronomy 12 00558 g005
Agronomy 12 00558 g006 550
Figure 6. Electrophoretic separation of PCR products (466 bp) obtained with the use of Fusarium spp. specific primers ITS Fu1/Fu2; L—GeneRuler 100-bp DNA Ladder, 1–13—tested samples, NC—negative control, PC—positive control.
Figure 6. Electrophoretic separation of PCR products (466 bp) obtained with the use of Fusarium spp. specific primers ITS Fu1/Fu2; L—GeneRuler 100-bp DNA Ladder, 1–13—tested samples, NC—negative control, PC—positive control.
Agronomy 12 00558 g006
Agronomy 12 00558 g007 550
Figure 7. Electrophoretic separation of PCR products (340 bp) obtained with the use of Fof1/Fof2 primers specific for F. oxysporum; L—GeneRuler 100-bp DNA Ladder, 1–13—tested samples, NC—negative control, PC—positive control.
Figure 7. Electrophoretic separation of PCR products (340 bp) obtained with the use of Fof1/Fof2 primers specific for F. oxysporum; L—GeneRuler 100-bp DNA Ladder, 1–13—tested samples, NC—negative control, PC—positive control.
Agronomy 12 00558 g007
Table
Table 1. Comparison of maize varieties used in the experiment.
Table 1. Comparison of maize varieties used in the experiment.
Variety (Breeder)FAO NumberEarliness of VarietiesType of HybridKernel TypeDirection of UseDisease Tolerance
Ustilago maydisFusarium
Ambrosini (KWS)220/220earlyTCflint-likeensilage/grainhighhigh
Ricardinio (KWS)230/240mid-earlySCflint-likeensilage/grainhighvery high
Smolitop (HR Smolice)230mid-earlyTCintermediateensilage/grainhighhigh
TC—three-way cross; SC—single cross; KWS—KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, international breeding company; HR Smolice—Hodowla Roślin Smolice, Polish breeding company.
Table
Table 2. Primers used and PCR conditions for determining fungus species.
Table 2. Primers used and PCR conditions for determining fungus species.
Species SpecificityPrimerPCR ConditionsProduct Size [bp]Source
Fusarium spp.ITS-Fu1, ITS-Fu295 °C 5 min; (94 °C 50 s, 56 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min) × 35; 72 °C 7 min466[24]
Fusarium avenaceumJiAF, JiAR95 °C 3 min; (94 °C 30 s, 58 °C 30 s, 72 °C 2 min) × 40; 72 °C 5 min220[25]
Fusarium culmorumFc01F, Fc01R95 °C 5 min; (94 °C 20 s, 66 °C 1 min, 72 °C 45 s) × 5; (94 °C 20 s,
64 °C 1 min, 72 °C 45 s) × 5; (94 °C 20 s, 62 °C 1 min, 72 °C 45 s) × 25; 72 °C 5 min		570[26]
Fusarium equisetiFeq-F, Feq-R95 °C 1 min 25 s; (95 °C 35 s, 66 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s) × 30, (95 °C 35 s, 54 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s) × 20; 72 °C 5 min900[27]
Fusarium graminearumUBC85F, UBC85R94 °C 2 min; (94 °C 1 min, 55 °C 1 min, 72 °C 2 min) × 40; 72 °C 5 min332[28]
Fusarium oxysporumFof1, Fof295 °C 5 min; (94 °C 50 s, 58 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min) × 35; 72 °C 7 min340[29]
Fusarium proliferatumPro1, Pro295 °C 5 min; (94 °C 50 s, 56 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min) × 35; 72 °C 7 min585[30]
Fusarium poaeFp82F, Fp82R94 °C 2 min; (94 °C 1 min, 55 °C 1 min, 72 °C 2 min) × 40; 72 °C 5 min220[31]
Fusarium sambucinumFsF1, FsR194 °C 60 s; (94 °C 50 s, 58 °C 30 s, 72 °C 60 s) × 25; 72 °C 7 min315[29]
Neocosmospora solani (syn. F. solani)TEF-Fs4F, TEF-Fs4R95 °C 2 min; (95 °C 45 s, 58 °C 45 s, 72 °C 2 min) × 40; 72 °C 10 min658[24]
Fusarium sporotrichioidesFspIT2K, P28SL95 °C 3 min; (95 °C 30 s, 68 °C 30 s, 72 °C 40 s) × 40; 72 °C 7 min288[32]
Fusarium verticillioidesVer1, Ver295 °C 5 min; (94 °C 50 s, 56 °C 50 s, 72 °C 1 min) × 35; 72 °C 7 min578[30]
Alternaria alternataAAF2, AAR395 °C 2 min; (95 °C 45 s, 58 °C 45 s, 72 °C 2 min) × 40; 72 °C 10 min340[33]
Table
Table 3. Mean air temperature, total rainfall and relative air humidity during the growing seasons in the years 2017–2019 at the Experimental Station in Osiny.
Table 3. Mean air temperature, total rainfall and relative air humidity during the growing seasons in the years 2017–2019 at the Experimental Station in Osiny.
MonthTen-Day PeriodMean Air Temperature (°C)Total Rainfall (mm)Relative Air Humidity (%)Mean Air Temperature (°C)Total Rainfall (mm)Relative Air Humidity (%)
2017201820192017201820192017201820191961–2017
AprilⅠ10.811.18.210.716.61.749.76842.18.05069
Ⅱ5.514.77.19.67.73.254.47039.9
Ⅲ6.21513.451.45.530.664.76458.1
monthly7.513.69.671.729.835.5566747
MayⅠ1017.39.528.44.87.065.86354.513.66770
Ⅱ14.41513.70.035.465.948.67777
Ⅲ16.919.115.539.119.213.255.56869.5
monthly13.817.212.967.559.486.1576967
JuneⅠ16.719.620.25.20.91.044.56252.316.87971
Ⅱ17.520.122.916.23.92354.76953.1
Ⅲ2016.82212.233.314.753.77448
monthly20.018.821.733.638.138.7516851
JulyⅠ17.319.317.17.36.69.950.66352.918.58771
Ⅱ1819.517.1101.4644.357.48644.8
Ⅲ20.42321.710.951.919.7527443.4
monthly18.620.618.6119.6122.533.9537447
AugustⅠ22.923.419.43.112.210.544.36944.817.87172
Ⅱ19.821.219.8100.17.172.6557552.9
Ⅲ16.517.821.34.48.43.656.27748.5
monthly19.720.820.2107.627.786.7527449
Table
Table 4. Fungal disease occurrence in maize cultivated under organic and integrated systems of management in the years 2017–2019.
Table 4. Fungal disease occurrence in maize cultivated under organic and integrated systems of management in the years 2017–2019.
DiseaseCultivation SystemMean Degree of Plant Infestation
201720182019
Northern corn leaf blightOrganic2.23 bA5.63 bC5.07 aB
Integrated2.69 aA6.59 aC3.84 bB
EyespotOrganic1.21 aA5.38 aC2.41 aB
Integrated1.36 aB4.21 bC0.2 bA
Common corn rustOrganic0.52 aB0.59 aC0.03 aA
Integrated0.11 bAB0.46 aA0.01 aB
Fusarium ear rotOrganic0.54 aA0.87 bA0.80 aA
Integrated0.30 bA1.38 aC0.44 bB
Different lowercase letters denote significant statistical differences between cultivation systems in the same year (according to the Mann–Whitney test), while different capital letters denote statistical differences among years (according to the Kruskal–Wallis test) at a probability level of p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 5. The infestation of maize varieties depending on the cultivation system in the years 2017–2019.
Table 5. The infestation of maize varieties depending on the cultivation system in the years 2017–2019.
DiseaseVarietyMean Degree of Plant Infestation in Each Cultivation System in 2017–2019
OrganicIntegrated
Northern corn leaf blightAmbrosini5.39 a5.57 a
Ricardinio4.47 a4.09 a
Smolitop3.24 a4.02 a
EyespotAmbrosini3.02 a2.16 b
Ricardinio2.71 a1.85 b
Smolitop3.26 a1.77 b
Common corn rustAmbrosini0.04 a0.04 a
Ricardinio0.18 a0.04 b
Smolitop0.92 a0.49 b
Fusarium ear rotAmbrosini0.73 a0.73 a
Ricardinio0.44 a 0.58 a
Smolitop1.05 a0.8 a
Different letters in rows mean significant statistical differences according to the Mann–Whitney test at p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 6. The infestation of maize varieties with corn smut depending on the cultivation system.
Table 6. The infestation of maize varieties with corn smut depending on the cultivation system.
VarietyPercentage of Infested Plants in 2017–2019 in Each Cultivation System
OrganicIntegrated
Ambrosini1.015.70
Ricardinio3.684.33
Smolitop5.678.00
No statistically significant differences were observed between systems according to the ANOVA analysis of variance at p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 7. Fungi isolated from infected maize plants from 2017 to 2019 in the organic cropping system.
Table 7. Fungi isolated from infected maize plants from 2017 to 2019 in the organic cropping system.
SpeciesIsolates Obtained in Organic Farming
2017201820192017–2019
F[%]F[%]F[%]F[%]
n = 15n = 54n = 66n = 135
Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler1147.833845.83959.18851.2
Fusarium avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc.000011.5110.6
Fusarium culmorum (Wm. G. Sm.) Sacc.00000000
Fusarium equiseti (Corda) Sacc.00000000
Fusarium fujikuroi Nirenberg 00000000
Fusarium graminearum Schwabe28.711.211.5142.3
Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl.417.41518.11928.83822.1
Fusarium poae (Peck) Wollenw.0044.820042.3
Neocosmospora solani (Mart.) L. Lombard & Crous [syn. F. solani (Mart.) Sacc.]00000000
Fusarium sambucinum Fuckel00000000
Fusarium sporotrichioides Sherb.28.7000021.2
Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg 0056.020052.9
Other Fusarium spp.417.42024.169.13017.4
Total isolates obtained23–83–66–172100
F—frequency; n—number of collected plant samples.
Table
Table 8. Fungi isolated from infected maize plants from 2017 to 2019 in the integrated cropping system.
Table 8. Fungi isolated from infected maize plants from 2017 to 2019 in the integrated cropping system.
SpeciesIsolates Obtained in Integrated Farming
2017201820192017–2019
F[%]F[%]F[%]F[%]
n = 15n = 42n = 46n = 103
Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler411.431421.2134745235.4
Fusarium avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc.0023.030021.4
Fusarium culmorum (Wm. G. Sm.) Sacc.00000000
Fusarium equiseti (Corda) Sacc.000012.210.7
Fusarium fujikuroi Nirenberg 00000000
Fusarium graminearum Schwabe00812.1212.296.1
Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl.1851.431421.2124.353423.1
Fusarium poae (Peck) Wollenw.38.61116.724.351610.9
Neocosmospora solani (Mart.) L. Lombard & Crous [syn. F. solani (Mart.) Sacc.]000012.210.7
Fusarium sambucinum Fuckel00000000
Fusarium sporotrichioides Sherb.411.43000042.7
Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg 0023.030021.4
Other Fusarium spp.617.141522.735112617.7
Total isolates obtained35–66–46–147100
F—frequency; n—number of collected plant samples.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Czarnecka, D.; Czubacka, A.; Agacka-Mołdoch, M.; Trojak-Goluch, A.; Księżak, J. The Occurrence of Fungal Diseases in Maize in Organic Farming Versus an Integrated Management System. Agronomy 2022, 12, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030558

AMA Style

Czarnecka D, Czubacka A, Agacka-Mołdoch M, Trojak-Goluch A, Księżak J. The Occurrence of Fungal Diseases in Maize in Organic Farming Versus an Integrated Management System. Agronomy. 2022; 12(3):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030558

Chicago/Turabian Style

Czarnecka, Diana, Anna Czubacka, Monika Agacka-Mołdoch, Anna Trojak-Goluch, and Jerzy Księżak. 2022. "The Occurrence of Fungal Diseases in Maize in Organic Farming Versus an Integrated Management System" Agronomy 12, no. 3: 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030558

APA Style

Czarnecka, D., Czubacka, A., Agacka-Mołdoch, M., Trojak-Goluch, A., & Księżak, J. (2022). The Occurrence of Fungal Diseases in Maize in Organic Farming Versus an Integrated Management System. Agronomy, 12(3), 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030558

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop