Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Soil Moisture Management Using Waste Green Algae-Derived Polymers: Optimization of Application Rate and Mixing Depth
Previous Article in Journal
Overexpression of the Peanut AhDGAT3 Gene Increases the Oil Content in Soybean
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

A New Strategy of Cross-Protection Based on Attenuated Vaccines: RNA Viruses Are Used as Vectors to Control DNA Viruses

1
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271000, China
2
Pest Integrated Management Key Laboratory of China Tobacco, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao 266100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2023, 13(9), 2334; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092334
Submission received: 11 August 2023 / Revised: 2 September 2023 / Accepted: 5 September 2023 / Published: 7 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Pest and Disease Management)

Abstract

:
Plant viruses can infect various types of plants, including food and oil crops, and ornamental flowers, threatening agricultural production and food supply. Cross-protection is an efficient strategy against severe viral strains. Due to distinct infection mechanisms, cross-protection cases involving RNA viruses and DNA viruses often rely on the utilization of corresponding attenuated strains for control purposes. In this study, we utilized cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), a member of the RNA virus group, as the foundational framework for developing attenuated vaccines. We developed four vaccines by inserting relevant sequences from tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), a DNA virus. All vaccines demonstrated effective prevention against TYLCV infection, with relative control efficacies exceeding 80%. Subsequently, we evaluated the preventive effects of these vaccines on mixed infections of CMV and TYLCV. Our findings demonstrated that CMV (R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4), CMV (R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4), and CMV (R2-2bPTIII-TYRep) displayed significant efficacy in preventing mixed infections. Following pre-inoculation with these vaccines, the disease index of tomato plants decreased from 100 to 56. This work provides theoretical foundations and tangible resources for controlling TYLCV through cross-protection while suggesting a feasible strategy for utilizing weak RNA virus vaccines to control DNA viruses.

1. Introduction

Viral plant diseases result in annual economic losses of up to USD 60 billion worldwide. Cross-protection with a mild strain of a disease-causing virus is considered an effective control measure. Cross-protection refers to the phenomenon in which plants infected with the mild strain of a virus are protected from subsequent infection by a virulent strain of the same virus [1]. Cross-protection mechanisms widely acknowledged in the industry include “RNA-mediated gene silencing” and “superinfection exclusion (SIE)”. RNA-mediated gene silencing involves the cleavage of double-stranded RNA generated during viral replication by dicer-like enzymes. This results in small interfering RNAs that selectively target and degrade the corresponding RNA sequences, thus causing gene silencing. SIE refers to the spatial segregation observed between different strains of the same virus within dually infected plant tissues [1].
Notably, cross-protection has been used as a control measure against viral plant diseases since the mid-20th century. In Brazil, cross-protection was achieved against the extensively disseminated citrus tristeza virus (CTV). Eighty million sweet orange trees were effectively protected by employing mild CTV strains, thereby mitigating the impact of the disease [2]. Similarly, the cross-protection of zucchini plants was achieved under field conditions in France by using a mild zucchini yellow mosaic virus WK (ZYMV-WK) strain. This approach resulted in significantly higher and more marketable fruit yields than those observed in control plants subsequently infected with severe ZYMV strains [3]. Numerous studies have reported the successful use of mild RNA strains as vaccines against RNA viruses, including tomato mosaic virus (TMV) and cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) [4,5]. An illustrative case involves African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) DNA-A, which induced resistance against both ACMV and East African cassava mosaic Cameroon virus (EACMCV) in cassava plants [6]. Though remarkable outcomes have been achieved using mild strains of RNA viruses, the use of mild strains of DNA viruses for cross-protection remains relatively limited.
The use of mild strains of RNA viruses to control DNA viruses has not been reported yet. Hence, this study aims to explore the potential of utilizing mild RNA virus strains as vaccines against DNA viruses, specifically focusing on cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) as the RNA and DNA viruses, respectively. CMV has a wide host range and can infect over 1200 plant species from 100 families, including monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants [7]. TYLCV exhibits a diverse host range and has been reported in 49 plant species across 16 families. Infection in tomatoes during the seedling stage leads to stunted plant growth, leaf curling, yellowing, and severe yield loss [8]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the overlapping region within the TYLCV coding frame generates substantial siRNAs. The transgenic expression of N-terminal amino acids of the TYLCV-Rep protein strongly inhibits TYLCV replication, while the transcription of R-Rep produces anti-sense RNA sequences that can specifically target and suppress gene expression [9,10].
In this study, a feasible strategy for utilizing RNA virus vaccines to control DNA viruses through cross-protection was explored. Four mild mutant strains of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) RNA2 containing viral fragments related to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) were constructed and used in combination to prevent infections of TYLCV and CMV in tomato plants. This strategy offers valuable insights into the use of attenuated RNA virus vaccines for the control of DNA viruses or simultaneous management of RNA and DNA viruses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The infectious clone plasmids containing CMVFny RNA1(D00356), RNA2(D00355), and RNA3(D10538) were donated by Professor Tao of Nanjing Agricultural University. The Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying the infectious clone of TYLCV (MN432609) was generously provided by researcher Li Fangfang from the Plant Protection Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The attenuated infectious clone mutant plasmids pCCFR2-2bPTI (constructed by inserting multiple cloning sites (BamHI, SpeI, and SmaI), as well as the TAATA sequence, immediately after the stop codon of the 2a protein at position 2662 G in the full-length RNA2 sequence of CMVFny), pCCFR2-2bPTII (constructed by inserting a fragment containing the TAATAG sequence and multiple cloning sites (BamHI, SpeI, and SmaI) at position 2662 G), and pCCFR2-2bPTIII (constructed by deleting a 90 nt fragment from position 2662 G to 2751 A and inserting the TAATAG sequence and BamHI, SpeI, and SmaI cloning sites) were preserved at the Plant Virus Laboratory, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University [11]. The mutants of pCCFR2-2bPTII and pCCFR2-2bPTIII used as basic vectors have been shown to have weak pathogenicity. However, the mutant pCCFR2-2bPTI used as a basic vector has been shown to have strong pathogenicity (Figure S1). Tomato plants of the commercially available “Yellow Saint Maiden” variety were selected.

2.2. Plasmid Construction

To evaluate the cross-protective efficacy of recombinant mutants, which were inserted into the identical TYLCV fragment but utilized different CMV vectors, we established CMV-R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4 and CMV-R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4. Furthermore, to assess the potential cross-protection of various TYLCV fragments within a consistent CMV vector context, targeting the potent toxicity of TYLCV, we developed CMV-R2-2bPTIII-TYRep and CMV-R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep for comparative analysis. Using Agrobacterium containing the infectious cloning plasmid of TYLCV as a template, fragments of overlapping regions of different coding frames of TYLCV, including TYLCV-C1C4, TYLCV-Rep, and TYLCV-R-Rep (Supplementary Materials), were cloned. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using TYBJ-C1C4-F/TYBJ-C1C4-R, TYBJRep-F/TYBJRep-R, and TYBJR-Rep-F/TYBJR-Rep-R primers (Table 1).
After enzymatic digestion, fragments were individually ligated into the pCCFR2-2bPTI, pCCFR2-2bPTII, and pCCFR2-2bPTIII vectors, resulting in the plasmids pCCFR2-2bPTI-TYC1C4, pCCFR2-2bPTII-TYC1C4, pCCFR2-2bPTIII-TYRep, and pCCFR2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep.

2.3. Preparation and Inoculation of Agrobacterium Solution

Plasmids containing wild-type CMVFny RNA1, wild-type CMVFny RNA2, or mutant CMVFny RNA2 and wild-type CMVFny RNA3 were used to transform competent cells of Agrobacterium GV3101 by the freeze–thaw method [12]. Positive clones were screened to obtain successfully transferred Agrobacterium, and resuspended in an agro-infiltration buffer (10 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L MES, 150 μmol/L AS) to adjust the OD600 value to 1.2. The suspension containing equal amounts of wild-type CMVFny RNA1, CMVFny RNA2, and CMVFny RNA3 was used as a positive control, while the mutant vaccine group comprised a suspension containing equal amounts of wild-type CMVFny RNA1, CMVFny RNA2 with inserted heterologous fragments, and wild-type CMVFny RNA3. The solution containing Agrobacterium without the vector was used as the healthy control. A disposable needleless syringe was used for inoculating tomatoes at the four-leaf stage. Plants were grown at 25 °C under 16 h light/8 h dark conditions.

2.4. Analysis of Pathogenicity and Stability of Mutants

On the third day after inoculation with the mutants, RNA was extracted from the systemic leaves of tomato plants. cDNA was synthesized with Reverse Transcriptase M-MLV (Takara) at 42 °C for 0.5–1 h using 1 μg RNA. A PCR procedure was performed as follows: 3 min at 95 °C; 15 s at 95 °C, 15 s at 52 °C, 60 s at 72 °C for 30 cycles; 5 min at 72 °C. RT-PCR analysis was performed using the primers CMV-Fny2-2510-F and CMV-Fny2-3050-R (Table 1) for amplifying 690 bp and 750 bp bands, respectively. Our findings proved the existence of stably inserted exogenous TYLCV fragments in the four mutants. On the 31st day after inoculation, symptoms were observed in tomato plants with diseases to assess the grade of symptom severity. The disease severity was graded according to plant height based on the methods of Wang et al. [13]. The disease index was calculated to display pathogenicity.
Level 0: The entire plant is disease-free.
Level 1: The disease-affected plant does not show obvious dwarfing and has a standard plant height.
Level 3: Dwarfing of disease-affected plants to over three-quarters of the standard plant height.
Level 5: Dwarfing of disease-affected plants to two-thirds to three-quarters of the standard plant height.
Level 7: Dwarfing of disease-affected plants to half to two-thirds of the standard plant height.
Level 9: Dwarfing of disease-affected plants to more than half the standard plant height.
Disease index: 100 × ∑ (Number of diseased plants at each level) × (Disease level)/(Total number of plants × Highest disease level).
Relative control efficacy (%): 100% × (Disease index of control group − Disease index of treatment group)/Disease index of control group.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Construction and Virulence Analysis of Attenuated CMV Mutants Containing TYLCV Specific Fragments

Mutant variants of CMV RNA2, namely R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4, R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4, R2-2bPTIII-TYRep, and R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep, containing the C1C4 overlapping regions and the Rep coding sequence, were constructed (Figure 1A). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was performed, the various RNA2 mutants mixed with wild-type RNA1 and RNA3 were inoculated into “Yellow Saint Maiden” cultivars of tomato plants. After 31 days post-inoculation, the height of the tomato plants was comparable to that of the healthy control, with flat-leaf morphology and an absence of viral disease symptoms. In contrast, tomato plants inoculated with CMVFny exhibited severe leaf wrinkling, curling, and conspicuous stunting, indicating that all four mutants displayed attenuated virulence (Figure 1B). RT-PCR analysis confirmed the presence of stably inserted fragments in each mutant variant (Figure 1C).
The 2b protein of CMV is a suppressor of viral gene silencing that is closely related to viral pathogenicity in plants [14,15]. In this study, the 2b protein was mutated to construct protein translation premature termination mutants R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4, R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4, R2-2bPTIII-TYRep, and R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep were constructed under the premise of maintaining the integrity of the 2b gene nucleic acid sequence in CMV RNA2. This was the reason why the mutant had both weak virulence and stability.

3.2. Analysis of the Cross-Protection Effect of Tomato Plants Pre-Inoculated with Attenuated Mutants against TYLCV Infection

After pre-inoculation with mild mutants for five days, the tomato plants were challenged with TYLCV (OD600 = 0.006). Plant phenotypes, disease indexes, and relative control efficacies were assessed after 34 days.
The effects of varied basic vectors containing a 150 bp fragment of the target virus were initially analyzed. Tomato plants not pre-inoculated with mild mutants exhibited significant stunting, yellowing, and leaf wrinkling after inoculation with TYLCV. Disease indexes of 11 and 19 were observed along with relative control efficacies of 89% and 81% for tomato plants that were pre-inoculated with R1/R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4/R3 and R1/R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4/R3, respectively, and then inoculated with TYLCV (Table 2). Both mutants demonstrated commendable protective effects (Figure 2A). RT-PCR analysis confirmed the presence of stably inserted fragments in each mutant variant and these results were verified by sequencing (Figure 2B, Figures S6 and S7). Notably, R1/R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4/R3 exhibited superior cross-protection in tomatoes compared to R1/R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4/R3. This was possibly attributable to the translated amino acids derived from the inserted overlapping region (C1C4) eliciting a discernible “SIE” response. The occurrence of “SIE” may be attributed to the partial TYLCV sequence fragment (TYC1C4) located before the double-stop codon TAATAG in the mutant CMV-R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4 constructed with CMV-R2-2bPTI as the skeleton, where exogenous fragments could express amino acids. Conversely, in the mutant CMV-R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4 constructed with CMV-R2-2bPTII as the skeleton, the partial TYLCV sequence fragment (TYC1C4) was located after TAATAG and could not be translated into amino acids normally, resulting in a failure to induce “SIE”.
Furthermore, the effects of using the same foundational vector carrying a 300 bp fragment of the target virus were analyzed. Disease severity indexes of 26 and 33 and relative control efficacies of 74% and 67% were observed with the pre-inoculation of tomato plants with R1/R2-2bPTIII-TYRep/R3 and R1/R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep/R3, respectively, followed by inoculation with TYLCV (Table 2). Remarkably, after adjusting the concentration of CMV-R2-2bPTIII-TYRep and CMV-R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep vaccines to be consistent, tomatoes were inoculated with the mixture at a ratio of 1:1, resulting in a significantly reduced disease index of 11, and a remarkable relative control efficacy of 89% (Table 2, Figure 2C). The presence of stably inserted fragments in each mutant variant was confirmed via RT-PCR analysis and these results were verified by sequencing (Figure 2D, Figures S8 and S9). The stability of two mutants in tomato plants inoculated with CMV-R2-2bPTIII-TYRep and CMV-R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep was specifically detected using two pairs of primers, namely TYBJRep-F and CMV-Fny2-3050-R, as well as TYBJR-Rep-F and CMV-Fny2-3050-R. Amplification of a 600 bp fragment confirmed the expected results, indicating the stable presence of both mutant loci in the mixed inoculation. In summary, TYLCV vaccines carrying both forward- and reverse-inserted segments demonstrated comparable levels of protection, when individually administered to tomato plants. However, co-inoculation with both variants resulted in more substantial and synergistic cross-protective effects.

3.3. Analysis of the Cross-Protection Effect of Tomato Plants Pre-Inoculated with Attenuated Mutants against Co-Infection of TYLCV and CMV

Several attenuated CMV mutants have demonstrated the ability to confer cross-protection against TYLCV. Further investigations were undertaken to determine whether these attenuated mutants could effectively combat mixed infections of CMV and TYLCV simultaneously. Tomato plants were pre-inoculated with the attenuated mutants and subsequently co-inoculated with TYLCV (OD600 = 0.006) and CMV (OD600 = 1.2) after a 5-day interval. Plant phenotypes were carefully monitored for 53 days, and disease indexes and relative control efficacies were calculated. The results revealed substantial stunting and severe leaf curling and wrinkling in tomato plants following co-inoculation with TYLCV and CMV. Notably, in tomato plants pre-inoculated with R1/R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4/R3, R1/R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4/R3, and R1/R2-2bPTIII-TYRep/R3, the disease indexes and relative control efficacies were determined to be 56, 56, and 63, and 44%, 44%, and 37%, respectively (Table 3). These plants were subsequently challenged with both CMV and TYLCV (Figure 3A). RT-PCR analysis confirmed the presence of stably inserted fragments in each mutant variant (Figure 3B).
Cross-protection is an environmentally safe method to control viral plant diseases [16] and has been used to control multiple plant viruses in the laboratory or field [4,17,18,19]. However, isolating and screening mild strains in nature for cross-protection is a time-consuming task. In addition, plants are usually infected not only by one virus, but by multiple viruses [16]. Therefore, the construction of stable multivalent attenuated vaccines is an effective measure to prevent and control complex infectious viral diseases.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we explored the potential of utilizing mild RNA virus strains as vaccines against DNA viruses. Four mild mutant strains of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) RNA2 containing viral fragments related to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) were constructed. The aforementioned attenuated CMV vaccines demonstrated efficacy in both the independent TYLCV control and control co-inoculated with TYLCV and CMV. Thus, it is feasible to employ attenuated RNA virus vaccines as a strategic approach to combat DNA virus targets. This strategy offers valuable insights into the use of attenuated RNA virus vaccines for the control of DNA viruses or the simultaneous management of RNA and DNA viruses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy13092334/s1, Figure S1: Pathogenicity analysis of basic vectors; Figures S2–S5: Uncropped image for gel electrophoresis; Figures S6–S9: Comparison of sequencing results of RT-PCR products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y.; Methodology and Validation, M.Z. and S.L.; Formal Analysis, M.Z. and Z.W.; Investigation, M.Z.; Resources, X.Y., C.Y. and S.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.Z.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.L. and X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32072382, 31872638; National Natural Youth Fund, grant number 32201570; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, grant number 2022M723467 and Weifang Tobacco Co., LTD. Science and technology plan project (2020-26).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ziebell, H.; Carr, J.P. Cross-protection: A century of mystery. Adv. Virus Res. 2010, 76, 211–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Grant, T.J. Evidence of tristeza, or quick decline, virus in Florida. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1952, 65, 28–31. Available online: https://eurekamagcom/research/013/704/013704162php (accessed on 4 September 2023).
  3. Lecoq, H.; Lemaire, J.M.; Wipf-Scheibel, C. Control of zucchini yellow mosaic virus in squash by cross-protection. Plant Dis. 1991, 75, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rast, A.T.B. M II-16, an artificial symptomless mutant of tobacco mosaic virus for seedling inoculation of tomato crops. J. Plant Pathol. 1972, 78, 110–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tomlinson, J.A.; Shepherd, R.J. Studies on mutagenesis and cross-protection of cauliflower mosaic virus. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1978, 90, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fondong, V.N.; Pita, J.S.; Rey, M.E.; Kochko, A.; Beachy, R.N.; Fauquet, C.M. Evidence of synergism between African cassava mosaic virus and a new double-recombinant geminivirus infecting cassava in Cameroon. J. Gen. Virol. 2000, 81, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Scholthof, K.B.; Adkins, S.; Czosnek, H.; Palukaitis, P.; Jacquot, E.; Hohn, T.; Hohn, B.; Saunders, K.; Candresse, T.; Ahlquist, P.; et al. Top10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 12, 938–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Prasad, A.; Sharma, N.; Hari-Gowthem, G.; Muthamilarasan, M.; Prasad, M. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus: Impact, challenges, and management. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 897–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Navas-Castillo, J.; Sánchez-Campos, S.; Díaz, J.A.; Sáez-Alonso, E.; Moriones, E. First report of tomato yellow leaf curl virus in Spain: Coexistence of two different geminiviruses in the same epidemic outbreak. Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhao, J.H.; Guo, H.S. RNA silencing: From discovery and elucidation to application and perspectives. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 476–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Liu, S. Construction of the Attenuated Vaccine Vector from Cucumber Mosaic Virus and Research on the Mechanism of Mutation Repair. Ph.D. Dissertation, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Weigel, D.; Glazebrook, J. Transformation of agrobacterium using the freeze-thaw method. CSH Protoc 2006, 2006, pdb.prot4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, J.; Hao, K.; Yu, F.; Shen, L.; Wang, F.; Yang, J.; Su, C. Field application of nanoliposomes delivered quercetin by inhibiting specific hsp70 gene expression against plant virus disease. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lewsey, M.; Surette, M.; Robertson, F.C.; Ziebell, H.; Choi, S.H.; Ryu, K.H.; Canto, T.; Palukaitis, P.; Payne, T.; Walsh, J.A.; et al. The role of the cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein in viral movement and symptom induction. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009, 22, 642–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lewsey, M.G.; González, I.; Kalinina, N.O.; Palukaitis, P.; Canto, T.; Carr, J.P. Symptom induction and RNA silencing suppression by the cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein. Plant Signal Behav. 2010, 5, 705–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pechinger, K.; Chooi, K.M.; MacDiarmid, R.M.; Harper, S.J.; Ziebell, H. A new era for mild strain cross-protection. Viruses 2019, 11, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Krstic, B.; Ford, R.E.; Shukla, D.D.; Tosic, M. Cross-protection studies between strains of sugarcane mosaic, maize dwarf mosaic, Johnsongrass mosaic, and sorghum mosaic potyviruses. Plant Dis. 1995, 79, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cong, Q.Q.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Lan, Y.F.; Guo, Z.K.; Yang, J.G.; Li, X.D.; Tian, Y.P. Evaluation of Potato virus X mild mutants for cross protection against severe infection in China. Virol. J. 2019, 16, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cheng, D.; Tian, Y.; Geng, C.; Guo, Y.; Jia, M.; Li, X. Development and application of a full-length infectious clone of potato virus Y isolate belonging to SYR-I strain. Virus Res. 2020, 276, 197827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Construction and virulence analysis of attenuated CMV mutants containing TYLCV-specific fragments. (A) Schematic representation of the CMV genome and mutant RNA2. (B,C) Pathogenicity analysis and RT-PCR-based detection of tomato plants inoculated with different TYLCV-inserted mutants. DI: disease index, M: DL2000 DNA marker. Red, blue, and green represent the three types of mutants, R2-2bPTI, R2-2bPTII, and R2-2bPTIII, respectively.
Figure 1. Construction and virulence analysis of attenuated CMV mutants containing TYLCV-specific fragments. (A) Schematic representation of the CMV genome and mutant RNA2. (B,C) Pathogenicity analysis and RT-PCR-based detection of tomato plants inoculated with different TYLCV-inserted mutants. DI: disease index, M: DL2000 DNA marker. Red, blue, and green represent the three types of mutants, R2-2bPTI, R2-2bPTII, and R2-2bPTIII, respectively.
Agronomy 13 02334 g001
Figure 2. Analysis of the cross-protection effect of tomato plants pre-inoculated with attenuated mutants against TYLCV infection. (A,B) Cross-protection analysis and RT-PCR-based detection of attenuated R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4 and R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4 mutants used against TYLCV-infected tomato plants. (C,D) Cross-protection analysis and RT-PCR-based detection of attenuated R2-2bPTIII-TYRep, R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep, and R2-2bPTIII-TYRep + R-Rep mutants used against TYLCV-infected tomato plants. M: DL2000 DNA marker. Red, blue, and green represent the three types of mutants, R2-2bPTI, R2-2bPTII, and R2-2bPTIII, respectively.
Figure 2. Analysis of the cross-protection effect of tomato plants pre-inoculated with attenuated mutants against TYLCV infection. (A,B) Cross-protection analysis and RT-PCR-based detection of attenuated R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4 and R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4 mutants used against TYLCV-infected tomato plants. (C,D) Cross-protection analysis and RT-PCR-based detection of attenuated R2-2bPTIII-TYRep, R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep, and R2-2bPTIII-TYRep + R-Rep mutants used against TYLCV-infected tomato plants. M: DL2000 DNA marker. Red, blue, and green represent the three types of mutants, R2-2bPTI, R2-2bPTII, and R2-2bPTIII, respectively.
Agronomy 13 02334 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of the cross-protection effect of tomato plants pre-inoculated with attenuated mutants against co-infection of TYLCV and CMV. (A,B) Cross-protection analysis and RT-PCR-based detection of attenuated R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4, R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4, and R2-2bPTIII-TYRep mutants used against simultaneous CMV and TYLCV co-infected tomato plants. M: DL2000 DNA marker. Red, blue, and green represent the three types of mutants, R2-2bPTI, R2-2bPTII, and R2-2bPTIII, respectively.
Figure 3. Analysis of the cross-protection effect of tomato plants pre-inoculated with attenuated mutants against co-infection of TYLCV and CMV. (A,B) Cross-protection analysis and RT-PCR-based detection of attenuated R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4, R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4, and R2-2bPTIII-TYRep mutants used against simultaneous CMV and TYLCV co-infected tomato plants. M: DL2000 DNA marker. Red, blue, and green represent the three types of mutants, R2-2bPTI, R2-2bPTII, and R2-2bPTIII, respectively.
Agronomy 13 02334 g003
Table 1. Primer sequences in this study.
Table 1. Primer sequences in this study.
Primer NamePrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Product SizePurpose
TYBJ-C1C4-FATGGATCCTGACATCTGTTGAGCTCTTAGCT150 bpAmplification of TYLCV-C1C4
TYBJ-C1C4-RATCCCGGGACGAGAATGGGGAACCACATCT
TYBJRep-FATGGATCCTTACGCCTTATTGGTTTCTTCTTGG150 bpAmplification of TYLCV-Rep
TYBJRep-RATCCCGGGGATGACGTAGACCCGCATTATTTAA
TYBJR-Rep-FATCCCGGGTTACGCCTTATTGGTTTCTTCTTGG150 bpAmplification of TYLCV-R-Rep
TYBJR-Rep-RATGGATCCGATGACGTAGACCCGCATTATTTAA
CMV-Fny2-2510-FAGAATCGACGGGAACGAGGT540 + 150 bp or 540 + 210 bpDetection of mutant stability
CMV-Fny2-3050-RTGGTCTCCTTTTGGAGGCC
Remarks: The protective bases are displayed in a bold font. The enzyme digestion sites are underlined.
Table 2. The relative control efficacy of attenuated vaccines against TYLCV.
Table 2. The relative control efficacy of attenuated vaccines against TYLCV.
Vaccine NameDisease IndexRelative Control Efficacy
TYLCV1000%
R1/R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4/R31189%
R1/R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4/R31981%
R1/R2-2bPTIII-TYRep/R32674%
R1/R2-2bPTIII-TYR-Rep/R33367%
R1/R2-2bPTIII-TYRep + R-Rep/R31189%
Table 3. The relative control efficacy of attenuated vaccines against TYLCV and CMV.
Table 3. The relative control efficacy of attenuated vaccines against TYLCV and CMV.
Vaccine NameDisease IndexRelative Control Efficacy
TYLCV + CMV1000%
R1/R2-2bPTI-TYC1C4/R35644%
R1/R2-2bPTII-TYC1C4/R35644%
R1/R2-2bPTIII-TYRep/R36337%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, M.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Yu, C.; Yuan, X. A New Strategy of Cross-Protection Based on Attenuated Vaccines: RNA Viruses Are Used as Vectors to Control DNA Viruses. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2334. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092334

AMA Style

Zhu M, Liu S, Wang Z, Yu C, Yuan X. A New Strategy of Cross-Protection Based on Attenuated Vaccines: RNA Viruses Are Used as Vectors to Control DNA Viruses. Agronomy. 2023; 13(9):2334. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Mingjing, Shanshan Liu, Zhao Wang, Chengming Yu, and Xuefeng Yuan. 2023. "A New Strategy of Cross-Protection Based on Attenuated Vaccines: RNA Viruses Are Used as Vectors to Control DNA Viruses" Agronomy 13, no. 9: 2334. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop