Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Profiling and Transcriptome Analysis Provide Insights into the Anthocyanin Types and Biosynthesis in Zingiber striolatum Diels Flower Buds in Three Planting Modes
Previous Article in Journal
The TIR1/AFB Family in Solanum melongena: Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling under Stresses and Picloram Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Drip-Irrigated Sugar Beet in Arid Areas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Revisiting the Potential of Seed Nutri-Priming to Improve Stress Resilience and Nutritive Value of Cereals in the Context of Current Global Challenges

1
Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria, BP 901, Hammam-Lif 2050, Tunisia
2
Laboratory of Bioactive Substances, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria, BP 901, Hammam-Lif 2050, Tunisia
3
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Yasar University, 35100 Bornova, İzmir, Türkiye
4
International Center for Biosaline Agriculture (ICBA), Dubai P.O. Box 14660, United Arab Emirates
5
Institute of Plant Ecology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(7), 1415; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071415
Submission received: 9 May 2024 / Revised: 11 June 2024 / Accepted: 13 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Yield and Quality Response to Cultivation Practices - Series II)

Abstract

:
Most crop species are cultivated in nutrient-deficient soils, in combination with other challenging constraints that are exacerbated by the current climate changes. The significance of micronutrient shortage in stress management is often underappreciated, although their deficiency restricts both plant growth and resistance to abiotic stresses and diseases. While the application of nutrients to growing plants is a potential strategy to improve plant resistance to abiotic stresses, seed nutrient status may also play a role in crop stress tolerance as a storage and accumulation site of nutrients. To avoid hidden hunger problems, developing countries need to increase domestic cereal production, enhance their resilience to extreme weather events, and improve their nutritional status and quality. Here, we analyze the accumulated knowledge about the effects of nutri-priming in cereal crop species with a focus on mechanisms of application and stress tolerance, keeping in mind the risk of crop damage mostly caused by global climate change, which is driving an alarming increase in the frequency and intensity of abiotic stresses. We also propose new approaches to food production, which may be promising solutions for global warming, emerging diseases, and geopolitical conflicts recognized as major drivers of food insecurity.

1. Introduction

The early 21st century has been associated with climate fluctuations and food insecurity [1,2,3], which are intensified by a growing global population, anthropogenic pollution, and, more recently, pandemics and armed conflicts [4]. Despite continued efforts of scientists to tackle ongoing environmental issues by developing new strategies and practices, human behaviors and ameliorated agricultural practices are the main categories at present to cope with encroaching environmental stresses that limit plant production in agricultural and natural ecosystems. As a result of micronutrient deficiencies, malnutrition and hidden hunger are of growing concern worldwide. These issues are likely to be aggravated by global climate change. Presently, every third person in the world is suffering from malnutrition, mainly caused by micronutrient deficiency in the crops. Hence, the production of biofortified crops with increased micronutrient contents as an innovative and sustainable agricultural practice might contribute to meeting the increasing needs of a world population expected to surpass 10 billion by 2050 [5,6].
Micronutrients include boron (B), chloride (Cl), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), zinc (Zn), cobalt (Co), iodine (I), and selenium (Se). Not only their availability but also their proper balance in the soils is essential for normal growth, development, and optimum yield of plants [7]. Micronutrients are also essential dietary components since their supply is critical for human health. Consequently, their deficiencies can cause severe and even life-threatening symptoms in humans, notably in developing countries [8]. For example, a deficiency in Fe or Zn results in anemia and immunodeficiency. This is partly because humans are unable to produce microelements endogenously and therefore need adequate and safe micronutrients in their daily diet. Plant food is the main source of dietary intake for humans and represents a major source of micronutrients. However, most crops are grown in soils challenged by low nutrient bioavailability [9,10]. The ongoing global climate changes aggravate this issue, besides impacting water resource quality and/or availability and increasing the prevalence of soil salinization [11].
The need to enhance micronutrient availability to crop plants has led to the development of several strategies to avert negative impacts on food quality. Prominent among these strategies is breeding for stress tolerance, yet this process is costly, time-consuming, and could be stymied by public rejection of genetically modified crops [12]. Another strategy consists of further augmenting fertilizer input, but the latter is clearly at odds with sustainability [13]. Considering these challenges, alternative approaches that would be affordable and economically feasible clearly need to be implemented.
Priming, or hardening, consists of pre-soaking seeds or exposing plants to a given level of stress, triggering a stress memory response and allowing plants to better cope when later exposed to environmental stresses [14]. Nutrient priming of whole plants and seeds is a well-established, cost-effective method to enhance endogenous nutrients in crop plants, thus improving their nutrient status and enabling them to acquire stress resistance [15,16,17,18]. Osmotic seed priming (e.g., hydropriming) consists on soaking seeds in low osmotic potential solution [19], while nutri-priming involves pretreating (priming) seeds in nutrient-rich solutions [20]. Nutri-priming is an innovative, simple, efficient, environment friendly, and economically affordable method. The aim of this review is to evaluate the potential of nutri-priming in the mitigation of the negative impact of abiotic and biotic stresses on food security.

2. The 21st Century, an Era of Global Climate Change Threatening Plant Productivity and Consequently Food Security

“Food security is achieved when every human being has regular access to a sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food enabling an active and healthy life” [21]. Based on this definition, there is a strong connection between food security and agriculture. However, the dynamics of ecosystems and global agricultural production are presently facing tremendous challenges due to global climatic changes, alterations in the global water and carbon cycles, and extreme weather phenomena (such as unpleasant temperatures). Climate change enhances the intensity of multifactorial stress combination [22,23], leading, for example, to the mutual influence of high temperature, drought, and salinity [24]. The related changes of the physico-chemical soil characteristics and soil composition result in soil degradation, thus posing a serious threat to crop yield and food supply [25]. According to Soares et al. [26], climate change may significantly impact the accumulation of minerals, proteins, carbohydrates, and antioxidant components in almost all crop species.
The bioavailability of nutrients in soils highly depends on water supply because water is the main driver of macro- and micronutrients, facilitating their intake and transport in plants [27]. Severe drought was shown to disturb nutrient accumulation in food crops [27]. A similar effect is triggered by the accumulation of Na+ and Cl, leading to a restriction in plant uptake of essential nutrients (notably Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu) and consequently to a nutritional imbalance, as documented in wheat and rice cultivars [28,29]. The atmospheric CO2 concentration has also been reported to impact macro and micronutrient (e.g., Fe, Zn, and Cu) contents in several crop species such as Lactuca sativa, Spinacia oleracea, Oryza sativa and Triticum aestivum [30,31,32]. The analysis of several minerals in C3 crops reveals that free-air enrichment and open-top chamber studies aimed at enhancing atmospheric CO2 concentrations result in a decrease (up to −17%) in the concentration of some micronutrients, notably Zn and Fe [33] together with an increased sensitivity of major crops to diseases [34]. Similarly, elevated ozone (O3) negatively affects the quality of fruits and vegetable crops [35]. High temperature induces alteration in the composition of carbohydrates, mainly glucose and sucrose, inside the seed [36] and reduces vitamin contents in several crop species [37].
In summary, extreme global climatic changes weaken plant performance and increase the frequency/severity of pests and pathogen attacks, leading to a significant loss of crop yield and quality [38]. The decrease in the concentration of essential micronutrients in cereals is of major concern for human health and populations in developing countries, which rely on cereals in their daily diet.

3. Significance of Micronutrients in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

3.1. What Is the Difference between Micronutrients and Heavy Metal Polluants?

Micronutrients are required by plants, animals, and humans in small quantities [5,39]. In plants, these essential elements are involved in all vital metabolic and cellular functions and, thus, cannot be substituted by other elements in their specific functions. A deficiency in one or more microelements results in an alteration of many cellular metabolic pathways.
Micronutrients are distinct from heavy metals in many ways. The term heavy metals refers to elements that are widespread in nature and generally present in soils or derived from magmatic, sedimentary, or metamorphic rocks [40]. Some heavy metals are crucial for living organisms, while others like cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), silver (Ag), lead (Pb), and chromium (Cr) are biologically non-essential and are toxic even at low concentrations. Even if essential, trace elements such as Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, and Zn can be toxic when exceeding a certain threshold and, hence, are termed heavy metals [41]. Given the similarity between non-essential and essential metals, competition between both elements can occur, leading to an alteration of many biological functions. Another difference between micronutrients and heavy metals is that the former improves the productivity and nutritional value of crops and, therefore, human health, while the latter has many side effects on living organisms, notably toxicity [40,41].

3.2. Specific Roles of Micronutrients in Plant Metabolism

Although present in very small quantities, micronutrients play big roles in plant growth and development. They are also key elements in a wide range of cellular functions, including control of gene expression, cell elongation, signal perception and transduction, energy metabolism, and primary and secondary metabolism [42]. In this way, some micronutrients act as catalytically active cofactors of many enzymes or as activators of several enzymes, while others are involved in protein stabilization [43]. Some micronutrients (i.e., Mn, Fe, and Cu) operate in mitochondria and chloroplasts as integral components of the electron transport chain [44]. Cl, Cu, Fe, and Mn are essential for several steps of photosynthesis, whereas Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn are especially associated with diverse enzymatic activities. Still, micronutrients play a big role in oxidative stress responses and redox reactions in plant cells [45]. For example, Se takes part in glutathione peroxidases and thioredoxin reductase, while Fe, Zn, and Cu are cofactors of different superoxide dismutase isoforms. Zn has both structural and catalytic functions as it is a cofactor of more than 80 proteins, as well as its involvement in protein synthesis. This was confirmed since protein contents are severely restricted in plants enduring Zn shortage. Zn deficiency results in a decrease in starch, proteins, and mineral contents and an inhibition of some crucial biochemical processes during the germination phase [46]. Moreover, in the field, plant sensitivity to biotic and abiotic stresses is partly explained by low Zn seed contents, resulting in low biomass production and productivity [47]. Mn is a structural element of several photosynthetic proteins and enzymes [48], while B is involved in various processes (i.e., the synthesis of proteins, cell respiration, transport of assimilates, carbohydrate and hormones metabolism, cell wall structure and synthesis) and is associated with carbohydrate metabolism and reproductive phase of the plants along with photosynthesis or enzymatic activities [49]. The specific function of I is the regulation of gene expression involved in the plant defense against biotic or abiotic stress [50]. I fulfills a functional role, notably as a part of proteins present in chloroplasts, ensuring an adequate function of photosynthesis [48]. Fe and Cu are associated with the photosynthetic electron transport chain since 80% and 50% of Fe and Cu were found in chloroplasts [51,52]. Fe is a cofactor of several enzymes, including those involved in N metabolism (i.e., nitrogenase and nitrate reductase), antioxidative defense system (i.e., catalases, peroxidases, and SODs), and TCA cycle. Fe is also a key element of respiration and is involved in both chlorophyll and DNA synthesis [44]. Mn is required by the photosystem II water oxidizing system under the photosynthetic process functioning [53]. Mn, as a cofactor of antioxidative enzymes, is crucial for mitigating oxidative damage induced by abiotic stressors. As shown recently by Bhat et al. [42], micronutrients influence secondary metabolism by affecting their functions, as in the case of Se, which boosts the accumulation of secondary metabolites in higher plants [54]. Recent studies suggest the involvement of several micronutrients in conferring stress tolerance because they activate several metabolic pathways, regulate the whole plant perception, and induce the adaptive response to stress conditions [55]. For example, during abiotic stress exposure, Se modulates gene expression and secondary metabolite biosynthesis and accumulation [56]. Overall, given their abovementioned versatile roles, an adequate supply of micronutrients is crucial for maintaining optimal rates of photosynthesis and respiration, both ensuring basic plant growth processes and optimal plant yield [51].

4. Factors Affecting Crop Nutritional Characteristics with Special Consideration on Cereals with Importance in Human Diet

Widely cultivated worldwide (covering 40% of all arable land), cereals represent a major source of human food and animal feed [57,58]. The world’s most important cereals are Zea mays, T. aestivum, O. sativa, Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor, Avena sativa, and Secale cereale, with a global production estimated at ca. 2626 million metric tons in 2020, representing over 60% of the world food consumption [59]. Agricultural areas dedicated to these staple crops amount to ca. 728 million hectares of the 1.5 billion ha of agricultural area [60].
The significance of cereals and their derived products is generally assessed in terms of consumption and nutritional value [58]. Staple cereals and their products have remained the most essential dietary component of human food over the past several decades [61]. Interestingly, cereal grains have been the principal component and primary source of the human diet for thousands of years since they provide humans with energy (more than 50% of their daily caloric intake) [57,62]. Furthermore, cereals and their derived products are precious sources of vitamins, proteins, carbohydrates, phospholipids, fibers, antioxidants, and minerals [57,63]. Recently, Laskowski et al. [64] documented that cereals represent an excellent source of macroelements, notably phosphorus (P) and potassium (K), and certain micronutrients like Mn (64%), Fe (34%), and Cu (31%). Cereals also have a high proportion of thiamin, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and vitamins, particularly vitamin B6 (Vit B6).
Several cereal grain processing methods, such as fermentation and the use of yeast in derived cereal products, were shown to improve cereal nutritional value [65,66]. This is particularly true for the increased vitamin and mineral intake, notably Zn and Fe [67]. Cereal-based products are generally rich in several minerals, notably Fe, Zn, and Mn [57,58]. Since they are rich in proteins, vitamins, minerals, carbohydrates, and other components, several healthy benefits for humans were ascribed to cereals. Nevertheless, cereals show limitations in the amounts of some essential amino acids such as lysine, threonine, and tryptophan. Thus, an over-reliance on cereals is directly linked to a number of disease-related risk factors, justifying the importance of improving the amino acid composition of such staple crops.
According to Brouns et al. [66], cereal grain consumption reduces the risk of many emerging diseases, such as cancers, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. A diet based on carbohydrate-rich foods with high fiber content, particularly whole-grain products, may contribute to preventing and lowering the metabolic syndrome “type 2” of diabetes and several cardiovascular diseases [66,68,69,70]. Recent studies [71,72] point out that dietary fiber plays a pivotal role in modulating tissue immune responses and inflammation, notably in the intestine. Grains of some cereal varieties are anthocyanin-rich products, and their health benefits include anti-oxidation, anti-cancer, glycemic and bodyweight regulation, neuroprotection, retinal protection, hypolipidaemia, hepatoprotection, and anti-aging effects [73]. Hence, they greatly contribute to the human diet and are considered as “dietary staple”. Cereals such as wheat, oats, and barley are also precious sources of antioxidants. Their whole grains are rich in many bioactive phytochemical compounds with high antioxidant activity, notably flavonoids, carotenoids, phenols, and tocopherols [74,75,76]. The health benefits of such antioxidant compounds were recently reviewed by Polonkiy et al. [72]. Cereal lipids are rich in essential fatty acids that cannot be synthesized by the human body itself [77]. This was evidenced by Slama et al. [78], who found that cereal oils are characterized by their high essential fatty acid contents playing definite functions in the human body, such as cellular activities, structural integrity and fluidity of the cell membrane, and regulation of blood pressure and the nervous system, among other purposes [79].
The composition and nutritional characteristics of cereals can be suboptimal, especially in arid and semi-arid areas, if plants are cultivated in soils with low micronutrient content or with low nutrient availability (notably Fe, Se, Cu, and Zn). For instance, cereals grown in arid regions characterized by high pH (especially calcareous soils) show symptoms of Fe or Zn deficiency [80], and their grains are generally poor in micronutrients, notably Zn [81]. According to Cakmak and Kutman [82], the major cause of Zn deficiency in humans is the intensive use of cereal-based foods, knowing that cereals have the lowest Zn concentration and thus do not meet human biological requirements.
The intensive application of macronutrient fertilizers such as nitrogen (N), P, and K and the related enhancement of growth may even aggravate the problem of grains with low micronutrients (especially Fe and Zn) at least in H. vulgare plants [83,84]. According to Prom-u-thai et al. [85], one-third of the world’s population is suffering from micronutrient deficiency, especially in developing countries, partly because of the undiversified diet principally based on cereals. Considering these concerning data, it is essential to improve cereal nutritional content and quality using new sustainable and cost-effective methods.

5. Main Biofortification Strategies Employed to Counteract Nutrient Deficiencies in Plants Including Cereals

In developing countries, cereals are the main source of micronutrients in human food. It is a major challenge to develop solutions to produce more crops with better micronutrient content in grains without affecting their nutritional quality, especially for plants grown on micronutrient-poor soils [26]. The fortification of staple foods can be achieved through genetic fortification (conventional and molecular breeding and genetic engineering methods), preharvest (i.e., fertilization and foliar spray), and postharvest methods (i.e., soaking, coating, dusting, sonication, and extrusion). Biofortification refers to the process by which the nutritional value of staple foods is improved by increasing their contents of one or more essential micronutrients [86,87]. Food fortification and biofortification, targeted agronomic enrichment of micronutrients, is a promising and sustainable approach ensuring both higher yield and optimal grain quality (especially Zn and Fe) [88]. Biofortification is currently the main agricultural technique to address hunger and malnutrition in developing countries [89]. This technique, used to fortify cereals in particular [86], is based on the application of exogenous organic/inorganic fertilizers or biofertilizers, either directly in the soil or via foliar pulverization (foliar spray) or pretreatment (soaking) of seeds with nutrients, a practice better known as nutri-priming [90]. The different methods used in agronomic biofortification are presented in Figure 1.
As shown in Figure 1A, micronutrients can be directly applied to soils to correct micronutrient deficiency in both soils and plants. Yet, it presents some risks since, generally, the elements are immediately fixed by different components present in the soil into insoluble forms, hence not being translocated to the consumable parts of the plant.
Unlike fortification via fertilization, nutri-priming is an easy and cost-effective method without side effects on both humans and the environment (Figure 1B). This approach is of major environmental and socio-economic significance because it ensures the production of crops with high micronutrient content but also with high tolerance to several environmental stresses [15]. Nutri-priming might contribute to efficiently attenuating climate change impact, too. Micronutri-priming of seeds led to faster and more synchronized germination and higher resistance to abiotic stresses at advanced developmental stages [91]. Given that plants suffering micronutrient deficiencies are more sensitive to the severity of abiotic stressors [92], maintaining nutrient homeostasis via nutri-priming is crucial for plant survival under the ongoing climate change [93].
Foliar fortification with micronutrients is another technique used to supply trace elements to plants (Figure 1C). It improves the micronutrient content of the different plant organs, notably seeds and grains. When sprayed, micronutrients enter leaves through stomata and are then transported to different plant organs via both apoplastic and symplastic pathways. The efficiency of micronutrient pulverization is affected by the leaf’s aptitude to absorb the supplied micronutrient, which in turn depends on several factors, such as light, leaf age, and transpiration. These factors generally result in a loss of the element itself since the mobility of the foliar-applied nutrient interrupts its translocation to the different plant organs. Furthermore, an excess of foliar application leads to abnormalities in crop growth.
Other techniques are used to enhance the micronutrient content of edible crops and are called food postharvest fortification, such as coating and extrusion [94]. Extrusion refers to the use of cereal grain coproducts like flour or bran to make derived products with high micronutrient contents. Since this technique can inactivate several antinutritional factors, it was used to enhance the bioavailability of some nutrients, notably Fe and Zn, to customers. However, it represents some inconveniences, such as low-moisture and high-shear conditions that can destroy substantial amounts of heat-labile nutrients [95] in addition to being costly. Seed coating consists of covering seeds with adhesive micronutrients to enhance seed performance and plant establishment under both non-stressful and stressful conditions [96]. Since seeds are directly intended for human consumption, a coating process using high amounts of micronutrients was added to seeds, followed by other processes, including drying seeds at ambient temperatures to restore their original moisture content. The main disadvantage of seed coating is the cost.

5.1. Seed Nutri-Priming Methodology

Nutri-priming implies soaking seeds in an adequate nutrient solution for an optimized duration before rinsing seeds several times with distilled water and drying them until their weight gets closer to the initial one [97]. Different priming agents and methods (Figure 2 and Table 1) were used to increase cereal micronutrient content depending on the plant species. Since these micronutrients are needed in very small quantities, the choice of the concentration of the priming agent should be thoroughly tested to avoid possible nutrient toxicity that can hamper germination (Table 1). According to the literature, organic or inorganic forms, chelated micronutrient sources, and nanoparticles are the most sources commonly used as priming agents (Figure 2).

5.1.1. Inorganic Agents

Inorganic agents such as zinc sulfate, manganese sulfate or ferrous iron, zinc or iron sulfate heptahydrate, and other forms are widely used for the nutri-priming process (Figure 2). This method is advantageous as it stimulates both plant growth and nutrient uptake [110]. Yet, understanding absorption mechanisms, translocation, and utilization of the micronutrient in plants prior to the selection of its suitable sources are determinant factors for nutri-priming [111]. As shown in Table 1, several micronutrients were used in their inorganic forms for optimal priming duration and at adequate concentrations, and they were efficient in improving several plant physiological processes and micronutrient uptake. Based on the literature, we found that Zn might be applied via its inorganic form as zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO4, 7H2O), zinc chloride (ZnCl2) zinc nitrate (ZnNO3), zinc carbonate (ZnCO3) and zinc oxide (ZnO) (Figure 2). However, the two major forms of Zn commonly used in nutri-priming are ZnSO4 and ZnSO4 7H2O because of their high solubility and their low soil reactivity. For example, soaking sugar beet seeds in ZnSO4 and ZnCl2 solutions enhances Zn concentration in plant tissues and was correlated with an increase in photosynthetic rate, transpiration, and stomatal conductance [112].
Figure 2 and Table 1 depict that other inorganic forms can be used as nutri-priming agents and include sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4), cobalt sulfate (CuSO₄, 7H₂O), and cobalt nitrite (CoN2O4), ferrous iron (FeSO4, 7H2O), and manganese sulfate (MnSO4). In common wheat, nutri-priming with ZnSO4, 7H2O improves grain zinc concentration [100]. Similarly, seed pretreatment with FeSO₄, 7H₂O increases seed Fe concentration in rice [113]. Seed priming with (NH4)6Mo7O24, 4H2O for 10 h enhances the net CO2 assimilation rate, chlorophyll content, biological N fixation, and grain yield [114].

5.1.2. Organic Micronutrient Chelators

Micronutrients can be provided to seeds as organic compounds, mainly in their chelated forms (Figure 2). Such organic complexing products (i.e., amino acids and polysaccharides) boost the content of micronutrients in the plant’s edible parts [115]. For instance, synthetic Zn–amino acid chelates are widely used as natural and important sources of Zn in seed priming [103]. In this case, Zn is associated with diverse chelators, such as amino acids, forming complexes such as Zn(His)2, Zn(Met)2, Zn(Gln)2, Zn(Gly)2, and Zn(Arg)2 (Table 1), which are widely used in the priming process [116]. The potential of some Zn–amino acid chelates in improving plant growth performance was investigated, and the main results show that Zn-Ala and Zn-Gly increase the plant dry weight and shoot length and promote Zn uptake by common wheat grown in calcareous soil [115]. More recently, Hussaan et al. [117] demonstrated that Zn-Lys seed priming mitigates the negative impact of Cd stress by improving several attributes, including nutrient uptake, chlorophyll synthesis, biomass accumulation, and antioxidant defense system and reducing Cd uptake by roots. Likewise, Zn(His)2 and Zn(Arg)2 seed priming increases grain Zn content in wheat [103]. Synthetic Fe–amino acid chelates are also used in the priming process as Fe (Gly)2 and Fe (Met)2 amino chelates with beneficial effects on the nutritional quality of crops grown in Fe-deficient soils [118].

5.1.3. Synthetic Microelements Chelators

As shown in Figure 2, in such a kind of nutri-priming, the metal ion is coordinated with the chelating agent [119]. Among the chelates widely used to produce synthetic microelements chelators, EDTA and DTPA are shown to increase plant metal uptake by entrapping ions such as Zn or Fe and releasing them slowly to be available for plants in a timely manner [120]. Several criteria should be taken into consideration when producing a synthetic microelement chelator, such as the uptake, translocation, and utilization of nutrients in plants [110,121]. This method has many risks because of the slow biodegradability of synthetic chelators, resulting in their persistence in the environment [122]. For example, Zn-EDTA, which is the most synthetic chelated form frequently used in nutri-priming, presents some environmental risks given its low biodegradability and the release of toxic compounds through a process called photodegradability. Other chelated micronutrient sources are also used in nutri-priming, including FeEDTA and CuEDTA. Recently, Hadia et al. [109] used Fe-EDTA (50 µmol/L) for priming seeds of common wheat and found that Fe improved several physiological attributes, including the germination rate, root weight, length and number, and coleoptile length under salt stress (Table 1). In maize, seed priming with Zn-EDTA results in a maximum concentration of Zn in grains as compared to ZnSO4 [123].

5.1.4. Nanoparticles (NPs)

Nano-priming or seed nutri-priming via nanoparticles is another method used in nutri-priming (Figure 2) and has emerged as a promising approach for increasing crop productivity and ensuring global food security [124]. Increasing attention is given to the use of nanoparticles in nutri-priming because this technique is more advantageous, notably with respect to the high stability and adsorption of NPs and the improvement in seed performance and crop productivity either under optimal or adverse environmental cues [125]. The benefits of seed nutri-priming via NPs have been reviewed recently by Gupta et al. [126]. Nano-priming facilitates the uptake of water and nutrients during the germination process through the formation of nanopores and the induction of aquaporin gene expression. Moreover, NPs, as potential carriers for plant growth regulators, can act as stimulators during germination and early seedling growth phases by mediating ROS production and enhancing the activity of several hydrolyzing enzymes, such as proteases and amylases.
Zn nanoparticles (ZnNP) are, for example, widely used to improve seed quality and seedling establishment. Similarly, particles of nano-Scale Zero Valent Iron (nZVI) are utilized for priming applications (synthesized by sodium borohydride method using ferrous sulfate, FeSO4, 7H2O) and EDTA (C10H14N2Na2O8, 2H2O). Cu nanoparticles (CuNP) are also applied as nutri-priming agents in maize [127]. Synthesizing chitosan nanoparticles containing Cu ions is performed by the ionotropic gelation process. Fe-NP seed priming triggers Fe uptake and increases starch metabolism [128]. In watermelon, the same technique increases non-enzymatic antioxidant system defense and induces jasmonate-dependent defense responses at the early stages of seedling development [129]. As demonstrated by Rizwan et al. [104], the application of ZnO NPs and Fe NPs increases Zn and Fe concentrations in grains (Table 1).

6. Key Mechanisms of Seed Nutri-Priming for Multiple Environmental Stress Mitigation

The mechanisms underlying nutri-priming could be addressed at different developmental stages of the life cycle of any plant species: (i) germination, (ii) vegetative stage, and (iii) fructification stage (Figure 3). During germination (Figure 3A), seed nutri-priming reduces the time period of the germination process and improves both germination rate and seedlings uniformity [130]. In this way, seed priming with B triggers various metabolic activities, leading to the activation of enzymes involved in starch metabolism, notably α-amylase and starch phosphorylase [131]. The activity of both enzymes generates sufficient sugar amounts necessary for protein synthesis and results in faster germination and uniform seedling emergence [108]. According to Alejandro et al. [132], Mn seed priming hastens seed germination via the activation of DNA polymerase (a DNA repair enzyme functioning in plant meristematic and meiotic tissues) and results in an increase in germination speed and rate [133].
As germination is a complex process that includes imbibition, activation of metabolic processes, and intensive embryo growth and radicle growth, the effect of the priming agent is phase-dependent. During imbibition, priming induces DNA repair, respiration, cell cycle initiation, gene transcription, signaling pathways (ROS and phytohormones), and eventually stress-responsive genes such as the Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) proteins [134]. In the second phase, priming triggers significant changes in nucleic acid methylation as well as chromatins and leads to the accumulation of several transcription factors regulating a wide range of metabolic pathways [135]. Simultaneously, other physiological and biochemical modifications occur, such as the enhanced synthesis and accumulation of osmolytes (i.e., proline) and carbohydrates. In addition, enzymes involved either in N metabolism (i.e., nitrate reductase) or the removal of produced reactive oxygen species (i.e., superoxide dismutase and peroxidases) are activated [136]. The third post-germination phase is characterized by the mobilization of stored reserve, including micronutrients, and hence represents a major step in the nutri-priming process, which is followed by several events, notably radical elongation. As documented by Reis et al. [137], Fe and Zn seed priming significantly affects the mitotic index and the regular and irregular division phases of wheat root cells and increases seed Zn and Fe contents, which are later translocated to growing tissues for better seedling development and establishment via the activation of several nutrient transporters (Figure 3A).
At subsequent stages of plant ontogeny, a beneficial effect of priming with several micronutrients, including Fe and Zn, on early seedling growth was observed in different plant species (Figure 3B). Such a positive effect could be due to the effectiveness of both elements in increasing cell division, expansion, and meristematic activities of plant tissues [138] via the stimulation of phytohormone biosynthesis, notably auxins, which are involved in cell elongation and cell differentiation of meristematic tissues [139,140]. B-nutri-priming promotes several physiological attributes related to plant growth [39] (i.e., root and shoot lengths and seedling fresh and dry weights), given the implication of B in cell elongation, mitosis, and meristem growth. Moreover, the use of B in nutri-priming improves water uptake by increasing the number of root tips and mycorrhizae [141]. Photosynthesis, the major process involved in plant biomass accumulation, is also enhanced by nutri-priming, as revealed by El-Shintinawy et al. [142], who found an improvement of leaf chlorophyll synthesis and stabilization in sunflower following seed treatment with B. Likewise, the use of Mn as a biostimulant induces changes in photosynthetic processes through its positive effect on ATP generation and Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate (RuBP) enzyme regeneration [143]. Seed priming with Co enhances ethylene production and triggers several physiological processes involved in seedling establishment and flower initiation [144]. Nutri-priming also affects plant secondary metabolism as some micronutrients such as Mn induce changes in phenolic compounds as this element is a cofactor of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, a key enzyme of the phenylpropanoid metabolism [143]. Likewise, Zn seed priming improves plant mineral status by promoting nutrient uptake and water use efficiency [144]. This is due to an enhancement of the expression levels and activities of several transporters involved in micronutrient uptake, translocation, and storage. In wheat, seed priming with iron oxide nanoparticles enhances Fe absorption and deposition as well as its translocation within the different plant organs including grains [145]. The use of nanoparticles (NPs) such as Fe2O3 NPs16 and AgNPs13 to improve cereal seed development is a successful method since both metal-based nanoparticles trigger Fe acquisition and increase starch metabolism [128].
At the reproductive stage, seeds yielded by plants primed with micronutrients are generally rich in many trace elements and are thus called biofortified seeds (Figure 3C). Recent reports pointed out that nutri-priming improves the nutrient contents of seeds, notably cereals [146]. Seed priming with Zn has received attention due to its role in antiviral immunity. Thus, its use as a supplement for COVID-19 patient treatment [147] made this element a suitable candidate for the nutri-priming process. Several investigations on cereal species documented the importance of seed micronutrient pre-soaking in enhancing seed nutrient reserves [148,149,150]. Interestingly, it was found that seed priming with 4 mM ZnSO4 results in a 7-fold increase in Zn content in maize grains [149,150]. This could be due to the stimulation of several transporters responsible for Zn uptake and storage. According to Suandria et al. [145], priming wheat grains with Fe significantly improves their Fe content with a noticeable over-accumulation of Fe in the different sections of the seed, which was concomitant to the stimulation of Fe transport. The main transporters involved in Fe uptake, translocation, and storage in relation to Fe biofortification have recently been reviewed by Rehman et al. [151]. Similarly, nutri-priming via B improves its availability and translocation to seeds due to an upregulation of several mechanisms underlying B transport, especially the putative B transporters for xylem loading, which further enhances B supply to wheat grains [152].
Under harsh environmental conditions, seed nutri-priming improves plants’ resilience when challenged with abiotic stresses (Table 2). Pretreatment of seeds with micronutrients boosts several metabolic pathways, leading to a modulation of plant primary (such as amino acid) and secondary (such as phenols and flavonoids) metabolism in response to different stressors [153]. Several molecular mechanisms have been shown to be regulated under priming processes, including an increase in the expression of various stress-related genes and proteins, and generate a stress imprint enabling plants to withstand several environmental cues. According to Bhatia and Gupta [154], nutri-priming is an efficient strategy for boosting the defensive capacity of plants by inducing active or inactive signaling protein accumulation. This assumption was confirmed given that several protein precursors switch from inactive to active forms when plants encounter adverse environmental conditions. Under salinity stress, the expression of several sodium transporters, notably SOS and NHX, was upregulated by seed priming, leading to a restriction of Na+ uptake and accumulation in shoots [135]
At the molecular level, seed nutri-priming induces changes in the plant genome, including activation or repression of either transcription factors or RNA polymerase, allowing the plant species to acquire a stress memory [135]. In his regard, several micronutrients were shown to regulate the activity of several Na+ and K+ transporters, resulting in better tolerance to salt stress. In rice treated with Na2SeO4 and subjected to salt stress, an increase in OsNHX1 transcript levels is noted, resulting in a higher K+/Na+ ratio and better performance under hyper-osmotic salinity stress [155]. ZnSO4 triggers the accumulation of soluble sugar and proline, leading to an improvement in the mineral status of crops exposed to salinity [156]. The adverse impact of nutrient deficiency can be mitigated via Zn seed nutri-priming, as Zn promotes the translocation of nutrients from seeds to the different plant organs, resulting in an improvement in Zn and K uptake [18]. In maize, Zn seed priming improves the whole plant growth and the grain yield as well as Zn grain contents when plants grow in Zn-deficient soils [17] or at low temperatures [150].
To decipher the role of seed nutri-priming under limiting N conditions, it is worth revisiting N metabolism in plants, which is known to involve three major steps: N uptake by plant roots, its translocation and assimilation, and finally, its remobilization within the different plant organs [157]. In the rhizosphere, nitrate is taken up by roots and reduced to nitrite before its reduction to ammonium or storage in shoot or root vacuoles. These two steps are catalyzed by nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase. The abovementioned mechanisms were shown to be stimulated by seed nutri-priming under low N availability and resulted in a better response to N shortage. Recently, seed priming combining N and Zn was effective in mitigating the impact of N deficiency in rice [158]. This effect is due to the key role of Zn in (i) promoting N translocation and distribution from roots to shoots, (ii) the induction of the expression of N transporter genes, and (iii) the increase in N assimilation in leaves [159]. Furthermore, the combined effect of Zn-N seed priming results in the activation of protein synthesis and root activity for efficient nutrient uptake and translocation during the germination process, favorizing root and coleoptile development and hence seedling growth under limiting Zn and N conditions [158]. In rice grown under N deficiency, seed priming with Se improves the uptake of primary macro-nutrients, reduces lipid peroxidation and free radical (hydrogen peroxide, superoxide anion, and hydroxyl free radicals) accumulation and enhances both enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase) and non-enzymatic antioxidants (reduced glutathione and vitamin C) [160]. Still in rice, short and long-term arsenic-induced N deficiency stress effects have been mitigated via silicon seed priming with beneficial impacts on the expression of genes encoding several enzymes and transporters involved in the absorption and utilization of N [161]. Indeed, the expression of N absorption and assimilation-related genes, notably those encoding enzymes involved in N metabolism (nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, glutamine synthetase, glutamate synthase) and transport (NRT2 and AMT1, respectively, a high-affinity nitrate transporter and a high-affinity ammonium transporter protein) are upregulated in shoots and roots following plant exposure for 7 and 15 days to arsenic-induced N shortage stress. Seed priming combining selenium and other agents, including salicylic acid, also significantly increases root fresh and dry weights of rice grown under N shortage [162]. Interestingly, the same pretreatment of seeds lowers ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation, stimulates both enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase) and non-enzymatic (glutathione) components of the antioxidative defense machinery in shoots and enhances nutrient uptake under the interactive effect of N deprivation and Pb stress [162]. Recently, Pereira et al. [163] found that nutri-priming with 2 mM NH4NO3 promotes rice root length, root ammonium content, and total N content in shoots, which were concomitant to an increase in glutamine synthetase activity in the same organs. Moreover, root architecture, which generally displays an array of modifications to enhance N uptake and absorption under limiting N conditions, has been shown to be positively affected by low and high N priming (2 and 6 mM NH4NO3).
Abiotic stressors negatively affect photosynthesis. Seed nutri-priming, especially with Zn, Mg, and Mn promotes chlorophyll synthesis and mitigates such negative impacts [143,164]. Water shortage generally reduces the uptake of nutrients, including Mg, which is the core element of chlorophyll molecules and hinders the activity of enzymes involved in its biosynthetic paths. Zn or Mg seed soaking stimulates the synthesis of chlorophyll by affecting the abovementioned attributes [164,165] and enhances the production of osmolytes, involved in osmotic adjustment and, thereby, the maintenance of adequate photosynthetic functioning and plant growth rate [166].
Abiotic stress-induced oxidative damage is a common disorder in plants. Nutri-priming reduces the effects of oxidative stress by improving the antioxidative defense system [135] via gene expression reprogramming [167]. In common wheat and common mustard, Zn or Se seed priming increases the activities of several antioxidative enzymes as well as the expression levels of their stress-responsive genes [98,168]. Recent investigations [168] point out that seed priming with Se promotes the expression of stress-responsive genes, notably those encoding SOD, CAT, APX, and POD, resulting in the alleviation of salt stress in common mustard. In sweet peppers, seed priming with 0.5 mg/L Mn2+ increases the activity of MnSOD in seedlings grown under salt stress by 5.51-fold [169]. According to Salehi et al. [143], the general mechanism underlying Mn seed priming in sweet annie is the stimulation of SOD activity and the adjustment of proline and phenolic compound production. The stimulation of antioxidative defense by seed priming attenuates oxidative damage by lowering the degree of lipid peroxidation, as shown for common wheat primed with Mg and Zn [164]. In Table 2, we provide a list of references about the use of nutri-priming at diverse abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, nutrient deficiency, and low temperature.
Table 2. Examples of agents used as part of the nutri-priming approach for improving crop the responses of cereals and other plant species to osmotic (drought, salinity), thermal, and nutrient (Fe, Zn, and Mn) deficiency stresses.
Table 2. Examples of agents used as part of the nutri-priming approach for improving crop the responses of cereals and other plant species to osmotic (drought, salinity), thermal, and nutrient (Fe, Zn, and Mn) deficiency stresses.
Priming AgentPlant SpeciesStressReference
FeSO4Beta vulgaris
Vigna Radiata
Glycine max
Stevia rebaudiana
Salinity
Salinity
Iron deficiency
Drought
[170]
[171]
[172]
[173,174]
ZnSO4Zea mays
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max
Green bean
Avena sativa
Salinity[149]
[98]
[156]
[175]
[176]
Zea mays
Hordeum vulgare
Glycine max
Cicer arietinum
Zn deficiency[17]
[148]
[172]
[177]
Zea mays
Spinacia oleracea
Low temperature[150]
[178]
Zea mays
Triticum durum
Stevia rebaudiana
Nigella sativa
Vicia faba
Drought[179]
[180]
[173,174]
[181]
[182]
MnSO4Glycine maxZn and Mn deficiency[183]
Na2SeO4Oryza sativa
Zea mays, Triticum durum
Oryza sativa
Drought
Drought
Salinity
[184]
[179,185,186]
[155]
CuSO4Brassica rapa
Avena sativa
Salinity[187]
[176]

7. Conclusions

The intensity and rapidity of changes currently affecting climate, natural resources availability, and associated risks (including health) provide strong evidence that the current century will be challenging for humanity. Among the lessons learned from recent global crises (geopolitical and COVID-19 issues), ensuring food security by enhancing cereal production and quality must be included in the future management programs of governments worldwide, especially in developing countries where the diet is principally based on cereals. It is therefore urged to reflect on how to develop or promote sustainable and affordable alternatives to mitigate these environmental issues. This notably includes developing innovative and environmentally friendly methods like nutri-priming that could improve crop micronutrient content and make humans ready for fighting future pandemics. Nutri-priming, a new, easy, and cost-effective approach, should be introduced in agricultural practices with promising applications in mitigating the ongoing crisis, including climate change, the effects of conflicts, and pandemic emergence. This approach is not the only alternative to deal with the abovementioned issues, but it proved to be efficient in increasing mineral reserves and their translocation during plant development, and also improving crop resistance to stress combination and crop micronutrient content, which benefits the human immune system (and hence, health), not only in food-insecure regions. As key actors of such an approach, farmers need to be convinced by the importance of nutri-priming. Therefore, increasing awareness about the multidimensional benefits of biofortification in general and nutri-priming in particular outside the scientific community has to be achieved. Finally, it has to be stated that the acceptance of such crops might only happen if the seeds of these crops are available and affordable.

Author Contributions

H.H., I.B.S.D. and A.D.: conceptualization, data collection, and draft writing. H.H. and H.M.: Funding. H.M., I.T., H.-W.K. and C.A.: manuscript reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The support provided by the Arab German Young Academy of Sciences and Humanities (AGYA) to Dr. Henda Mahmoudi as part of the research mobility program (RMP) is gratefully acknowledged. Dr. Hayet Houmani was supported by the MOBIDOC POST-DOC program, funded by the Tunisian Agency for the Promotion of Scientific Research (ANPR).

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the support of the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (LR15CBBC02).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Khanal, S.; Lutz, A.F.; Kraaijenbrink, P.D.A.; Van Den Hurk, B.; Yao, T.; Immerzeel, W.W. Variable 21st Century Climate Change Response for Rivers in High Mountain Asia at Seasonal to Decadal Time Scales. Water Resour. Res. 2021, 57, e2020WR029266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fan, Y.; Tjiputra, J.; Muri, H.; Lombardozzi, D.; Park, C.-E.; Wu, S.; Keith, D. Solar Geoengineering Can Alleviate Climate Change Pressures on Crop Yields. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gao, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ibarra, D.E.; Du, X.; Dong, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, C. Clay Mineralogical Evidence for Mid-Latitude Terrestrial Climate Change from the Latest Cretaceous through the Earliest Paleogene in the Songliao Basin, NE China. Cretac. Res. 2021, 124, 104827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mbah, R.E.; Wasum, D. Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: A Review of the Economic Impact of Russian-Ukraine Crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe. Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J. 2022, 9, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Koç, E.; Karayiğit, B. Assessment of biofortification approaches used to improve micronutrient-dense plants that are a sustainable solution to combat hidden hunger. J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 475–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Raza, Q.; Azhar, M.T.; Rana, I.A.; Ahmad, M.Q.; Atif, R.M. Biofortification of crops to achieve food and nutritional security. In Biofortification of Grain and Vegetable Crops; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zaib, M.; Hussain, M.; Mumtaz, S.; Khalid, M.; Raza, I.; Abbas, S.; Danish, M.; Abbas, R.; Muhammad, N.; Bano, S. Micronutrients and Their significance in Agriculture: A Mini Review with Future Prospects. Int. Res. J. Edu. Technol. 2023, 5, 234–252. [Google Scholar]
  8. Myers, S.S.; Zanobetti, A.; Kloog, I.; Huybers, P.; Leakey, A.D.B.; Bloom, A.J.; Carlisle, E.; Dietterich, L.H.; Fitzgerald, G.; Hasegawa, T.; et al. Increasing CO2 Threatens Human Nutrition. Nature 2014, 510, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kihara, J.; Bolo, P.; Kinyua, M.; Rurinda, J.; Pikki, K. Micronutrient Deficiencies in African Soils and the Human Nutritional Nexus: Opportunities with Staple Crops. Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 3015–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Houmani, H.; Debez, A.; Slatni, T.; Yousfi, S.; Jellali, N.; M’sehli, W.; Abdelly, C.; Gharsalli, M. Insights into Physiological Responses of the Halophyte Suaeda fruticosa to Simultaneous Salinity and Iron Deficiency. Clean–Soil Air Water 2015, 43, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Calleja-Cabrera, J.; Boter, M.; Oñate-Sánchez, L.; Pernas, M. Root Growth Adaptation to Climate Change in Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lei, C.; Bagavathiannan, M.; Wang, H.; Sharpe, S.M.; Meng, W.; Yu, J. Osmopriming with Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Germinating Crop Seeds: A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Krasilnikov, P.; Taboada, M.A. Amanullah Fertilizer Use, Soil Health and Agricultural Sustainability. Agriculture 2022, 12, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ellouzi, H.; Zorrig, W.; Amraoui, S.; Oueslati, S.; Abdelly, C.; Rabhi, M.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Hessini, K. Seed Priming with Salicylic Acid Alleviates Salt Stress Toxicity in Barley by Suppressing ROS Accumulation and Improving Antioxidant Defense Systems, Compared to Halo- and Gibberellin Priming. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kumar, V.; Singhal, R.K.; Kumar, N.; Bose, B. Micro-Nutrient Seed Priming: A Pragmatic Approach Towards Abiotic Stress Management. In New Frontiers in Stress Management for Durable Agriculture; Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B., Singh, A.K., Singh, U.S., Fraceto, L., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 231–255. ISBN 9789811513213. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, X.; Quan, W.; Bartels, D. Stress Memory Responses and Seed Priming Correlate with Drought Tolerance in Plants: An Overview. Planta 2022, 255, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tamindžić, G.; Ignjatov, M.; Milošević, D.; Nikolić, Z.; Kostić Kravljanac, L.; Jovičić, D.; Dolijanović, Ž.; Savić, J. Seed Priming with Zinc Improves Field Performance of Maize Hybrids Grown on Calcareous Chernozem. Ital. J. Agron. 2021, 16, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zafar, S.; Hussain, Z.; Perveen, S.; Iqbal, N.; Zafar, M.A. Deciphering Physio-Biochemical Characteristics of ZnSO4 Primed Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plants Grown under Salt Stress. Pak. J. Bot. 2021, 53, 1943–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ma, L.; Wei, J.; Han, G.; Sun, X.; Yang, X. Seed Osmopriming with Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Enhances Seed Germination and Seedling Physiological Traits of Coronilla varia L. Under Water Stress. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0303145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. George, N.M.; Mohammed, E.A.; Muhammad, G.; Bolbol, A.A. Drought Stress Impacts and the Role of Endophytic Fungi Combating Abiotic Stress on Wheat. Bull. Fac. Sci. Zagazig Univ. 2024, 2023, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kidane, W.; Maetz, M.; Dardel, P. Food Security and Agricultural Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Building a Case for More Public Support; Main Report; Policy Assistance Series; FAO [u.a.]: Rome, Italy, 2006; ISBN 978-92-5-105544-1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zandalinas, S.I.; Fritschi, F.B.; Mittler, R. Global Warming, Climate Change, and Environmental Pollution: Recipe for a Multifactorial Stress Combination Disaster. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zandalinas, S.I.; Sengupta, S.; Fritschi, F.B.; Azad, R.K.; Nechushtai, R.; Mittler, R. The Impact of Multifactorial Stress Combination on Plant Growth and Survival. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1034–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jain, S.K.; Wettberg, E.J.V.; Punia, S.S.; Parihar, A.K.; Lamichaney, A.; Kumar, J.; Gupta, D.S.; Ahmad, S.; Pant, N.C.; Dixit, G.P.; et al. Genomic-mediated breeding strategies for global warming in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Agriculture 2023, 13, 1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zandalinas, S.I.; Balfagón, D.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Mittler, R. Plant Responses to Climate Change: Metabolic Changes under Combined Abiotic Stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 3339–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Soares, J.C.; Santos, C.S.; Carvalho, S.M.P.; Pintado, M.M.; Vasconcelos, M.W. Preserving the Nutritional Quality of Crop Plants under a Changing Climate: Importance and Strategies. Plant Soil 2019, 443, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fischer, S.; Hilger, T.; Piepho, H.-P.; Jordan, I.; Cadisch, G. Do We Need More Drought for Better Nutrition? The Effect of Precipitation on Nutrient Concentration in East African Food Crops. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 658, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Abbas, G.; Saqib, M.; Akhtar, J.; Haq, M.A.U. Interactive Effects of Salinity and Iron Deficiency on Different Rice Genotypes. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 2015, 178, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El-Fouly, M.M.; Salama, Z. Micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn) Foliar Spray for Increasing Salinity Tolerance in Wheat Triticum aestivum L. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 5, 314–322. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bisbis, M.B.; Gruda, N.; Blanke, M. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Vegetable Production and Product Quality—A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 170, 1602–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chaturvedi, A.K.; Bahuguna, R.N.; Pal, M.; Shah, D.; Maurya, S.; Jagadish, K.S.V. Elevated CO2 and Heat Stress Interactions Affect Grain Yield, Quality and Mineral Nutrient Composition in Rice under Field Conditions. Field Crops Res. 2017, 206, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fernando, N.; Panozzo, J.; Tausz, M.; Norton, R.M.; Neumann, N.; Fitzgerald, G.J.; Seneweera, S. Elevated CO2 Alters Grain Quality of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars Grown under Different Environmental Conditions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 185, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Medek, D.E.; Schwartz, J.; Myers, S.S. Estimated Effects of Future Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations on Protein Intake and the Risk of Protein Deficiency by Country and Region. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 087002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Leisner, C.P. Review: Climate Change Impacts on Food Security- Focus on Perennial Cropping Systems and Nutritional Value. Plant Sci. 2020, 293, 110412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dong, J.; Gruda, N.; Lam, S.K.; Li, X.; Duan, Z. Effects of Elevated CO2 on Nutritional Quality of Vegetables: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. DaMatta, F.M.; Grandis, A.; Arenque, B.C.; Buckeridge, M.S. Impacts of Climate Changes on Crop Physiology and Food Quality. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1814–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moretti, C.L.; Mattos, L.M.; Calbo, A.G.; Sargent, S.A. Climate Changes and Potential Impacts on Postharvest Quality of Fruit and Vegetable Crops: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1824–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dhankher, O.P.; Foyer, C.H. Climate Resilient Crops for Improving Global Food Security and Safety. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tamindžić, G.; Azizbekian, S.; Miljaković, D.; Ignjatov, M.; Nikolić, Z.; Budakov, D.; Vasiljević, S.; Grahovac, M. Assessment of Various Nanoprimings for Boosting Pea Germination and Early Growth in Both Optimal and Drought-Stressed Environments. Plants 2024, 13, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. DalCorso, G.; Fasani, E.; Manara, A.; Visioli, G.; Furini, A. Heavy Metal Pollutions: State of the Art and Innovation in Phytoremediation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Appenroth, K.-J. What Are “Heavy Metals” in Plant Sciences? Acta Physiol. Plant. 2010, 32, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bhat, B.A.; Islam, S.T.; Ali, A.; Sheikh, B.A.; Tariq, L.; Islam, S.U.; Hassan Dar, T.U. Role of Micronutrients in Secondary Metabolism of Plants. In Plant Micronutrients; Aftab, T., Hakeem, K.R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 311–329. ISBN 978-3-030-49855-9. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hänsch, R.; Mendel, R.R. Physiological Functions of Mineral Micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kaur, H.; Kaur, H.; Kaur, H.; Srivastava, S. The Beneficial Roles of Trace and Ultratrace Elements in Plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 100, 219–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Blasco, B.; Navarro-León, E.; Ruiz, J.M. Oxidative Stress in Relation With Micronutrient Deficiency or Toxicity. In Plant Micronutrient Use Efficiency; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 181–194. ISBN 978-0-12-812104-7. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ozturk, L.; Yazici, M.A.; Yucel, C.; Torun, A.; Cekic, C.; Bagci, A.; Ozkan, H.; Braun, H.; Sayers, Z.; Cakmak, I. Concentration and Localization of Zinc during Seed Development and Germination in Wheat. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 128, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cakmak, I. Zinc Deficiency in Wheat in Turkey. In Micronutrient Deficiencies in Global Crop Production; Alloway, B.J., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 181–200. ISBN 978-1-4020-6859-1. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chrysargyris, A.; Höfte, M.; Tzortzakis, N.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Di Gioia, F. Editorial: Micronutrients: The Borderline Between Their Beneficial Role and Toxicity in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 840624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zewide, I.; Sherefu, A. Review Paper on Effect of Micronutrients for Crop Production. Nutr. Food Process 2021, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kiferle, C.; Martinelli, M.; Salzano, A.M.; Gonzali, S.; Beltrami, S.; Salvadori, P.A.; Hora, K.; Holwerda, H.T.; Scaloni, A.; Perata, P. Evidences for a Nutritional Role of Iodine in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 616868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Assunção, A.G.L.; Cakmak, I.; Clemens, S.; González-Guerrero, M.; Nawrocki, A.; Thomine, S. Micronutrient Homeostasis in Plants for More Sustainable Agriculture and Healthier Human Nutrition. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 1789–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schmidt, S.B.; Eisenhut, M.; Schneider, A. Chloroplast Transition Metal Regulation for Efficient Photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Andresen, E.; Peiter, E.; Küpper, H. Trace Metal Metabolism in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 909–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Skrypnik, L.; Feduraev, P.; Golovin, A.; Maslennikov, P.; Styran, T.; Antipina, M.; Riabova, A.; Katserov, D. The Integral Boosting Effect of Selenium on the Secondary Metabolism of Higher Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jan, A.U.; Hadi, F.; Ditta, A.; Suleman, M.; Ullah, M. Zinc-Induced Anti-Oxidative Defense and Osmotic Adjustments to Enhance Drought Stress Tolerance in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 193, 104682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bandehagh, A.; Dehghanian, Z.; Gougerdchi, V.; Anwar Hossain, M. Selenium: A Game Changer in Plant Development, Growth, and Stress Tolerance, via the Modulation in Gene Expression and Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis. Phyton 2023, 92, 2301–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Biel, W.; Kazimierska, K.; Bashutska, U. Nutritional Value of Wheat, Triticale, Barley and Oat Grains. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech. 2020, 19, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Papanikolaou, Y.; Fulgoni, V. Certain Grain Foods Can Be Meaningful Contributors to Nutrient Density in the Diets of U.S. Children and Adolescents: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009–2012. Nutrients 2017, 9, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Olugbire, O.O.; Olorunfemi, S.; Oke, D.O. Global Utilisation of Cereals: Sustainability and Environmental Issues. Agro-Sci. 2021, 20, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Uçar, Ö. Chapter 15—The Situation of Cereals Cultivation in the World and Turkey. In New Approaches and Applications in Agriculture; Baran, M.F., Ed.; Iksad Publishing House: Ankara, Turkey, 2020; pp. 328–344. [Google Scholar]
  61. Erenstein, O.; Poole, N.; Donovan, J. Role of Staple Cereals in Human Nutrition: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff in the Infodemics Age. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sarwar, H. The Importance of Cereals (Poaceae: Gramineae) Nutrition in Human Health: A Review. J. Cereals Oilseeds 2013, 4, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Poole, N.; Donovan, J.; Erenstein, O. Viewpoint: Agri-Nutrition Research: Revisiting the Contribution of Maize and Wheat to Human Nutrition and Health. Food Policy 2021, 100, 101976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Laskowski, W.; Górska-Warsewicz, H.; Rejman, K.; Czeczotko, M.; Zwolińska, J. How Important Are Cereals and Cereal Products in the Average Polish Diet? Nutrients 2019, 11, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Apaliya, M.T.; Osae, R.; Kwaw, E.; Mahunu, G.K.; Osei-Kwarteng, M.; Ahima, J.K. Fermented African Cereal Products. In African Fermented Food Products—New Trends; Elhadi Sulieman, A.M., Adam Mariod, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 459–472. ISBN 978-3-030-82901-8. [Google Scholar]
  66. Brouns, F.; Van Rooy, G.; Shewry, P.; Rustgi, S.; Jonkers, D. Adverse Reactions to Wheat or Wheat Components. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1437–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Verni, M.; Rizzello, C.G.; Coda, R. Fermentation Biotechnology Applied to Cereal Industry By-Products: Nutritional and Functional Insights. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Janda, K.; Orłowska, A.; Watychowicz, K.; Jakubczyk, K. The Role of Oat Products in the Prevention and Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes, Hypercholesterolemia and Obesity. Pomeranian J. Life Sci. 2019, 64, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Temple, N. Fat, Sugar, Whole Grains and Heart Disease: 50 Years of Confusion. Nutrients 2018, 10, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Weickert, M.O.; Pfeiffer, A.F. Impact of Dietary Fiber Consumption on Insulin Resistance and the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes. J. Nutr. 2018, 148, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Iddir, M.; Brito, A.; Dingeo, G.; Fernandez Del Campo, S.S.; Samouda, H.; La Frano, M.R.; Bohn, T. Strengthening the Immune System and Reducing Inflammation and Oxidative Stress through Diet and Nutrition: Considerations during the COVID-19 Crisis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Polonskiy, V.; Loskutov, I.; Sumina, A. Biological Role and Health Benefits of Antioxidant Compounds in Cereals. Biol. Commun. 2020, 65, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhu, F. Anthocyanins in Cereals: Composition and Health Effects. Food Res. Int. 2018, 109, 232–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nguyen, S.N.; Drawbridge, P.; Beta, T. Distribution of Cereal Phytochemicals and Micronutrients in Whole Grains: A Review of Nutraceutical, Industrial, and Agricultural Implications. Cereal Chem. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Loskutov, I.G.; Khlestkina, E.K. Wheat, Barley, and Oat Breeding for Health Benefit Components in Grain. Plants 2021, 10, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Luthria, D.L.; Lu, Y.; John, K.M.M. Bioactive Phytochemicals in Wheat: Extraction, Analysis, Processing, and Functional Properties. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 910–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.-S. Omega-3 and Omega-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids: Dietary Sources, Metabolism, and Significance—A Review. Life Sci. 2018, 203, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Slama, A.; Cherif, A.; Boukhchina, S. Importance of New Edible Oil Extracted from Seeds of Seven Cereals Species. J. Food Qual. 2021, 2021, 5531414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kapoor, B.; Kapoor, D.; Gautam, S.; Singh, R.; Bhardwaj, S. Dietary Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs): Uses and Potential Health Benefits. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2021, 10, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kumar, A.; Choudhary, A.K.; Pooniya, V.; Suri, V.K.; Singh, U. Soil Factors Associated with Micronutrient Acquisition in Crops- Biofortification Perspective. In Biofortification of Food Crops; Singh, U., Praharaj, C.S., Singh, S.S., Singh, N.P., Eds.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 159–176. ISBN 978-81-322-2714-4. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hussain, S.; Maqsood, M.A.; Rengel4, Z.; Aziz, T.; Abid, M. Estimated Zinc Bioavailability in Milling Fractions of Biofortified Wheat Grains and in Flours of Different Extraction Rates. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2013, 15, 383–388. [Google Scholar]
  82. Cakmak, I.; Kutman, U.B. Agronomic Biofortification of Cereals with Zinc: A Review. Eur. J. Soil. Sci. 2018, 69, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cakmak, I.; Pfeiffer, W.H.; McClafferty, B. REVIEW: Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron. Cereal Chem. 2010, 87, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shahzad, Z.; Rouached, H.; Rakha, A. Combating Mineral Malnutrition through Iron and Zinc Biofortification of Cereals. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 329–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Prom-u-thai, C.; Rashid, A.; Ram, H.; Zou, C.; Guilherme, L.R.G.; Corguinha, A.P.B.; Guo, S.; Kaur, C.; Naeem, A.; Yamuangmorn, S.; et al. Simultaneous Biofortification of Rice With Zinc, Iodine, Iron and Selenium Through Foliar Treatment of a Micronutrient Cocktail in Five Countries. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 589835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ramzani, P.M.A.; Khalid, M.; Naveed, M.; Ahmad, R.; Shahid, M. Iron Biofortification of Wheat Grains through Integrated Use of Organic and Chemical Fertilizers in pH Affected Calcareous Soil. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 104, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vasconcelos, M.W.; Gruissem, W.; Bhullar, N.K. Iron Biofortification in the 21st Century: Setting Realistic Targets, Overcoming Obstacles, and New Strategies for Healthy Nutrition. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Blancquaert, D.; De Steur, H.; Gellynck, X.; Van Der Straeten, D. Metabolic Engineering of Micronutrients in Crop Plants. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1390, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ngozi, U.F. The Role of Biofortification in the Reduction of Micronutrient Food Insecurity in Developing Countries. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 5559–5566. [Google Scholar]
  90. Marques, E.; Darby, H.M.; Kraft, J. Benefits and Limitations of Non-Transgenic Micronutrient Biofortification Approaches. Agronomy 2021, 11, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tounekti, T.; Mahdhi, M.; Al-Faifi, Z.; Khemira, H. Priming Improves Germination and Seed Reserve Utilization, Growth, Antioxidant Responses and Membrane Stability at Early Seedling Stage of Saudi Sorghum Varieties under Drought Stress. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2020, 48, 938–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hajiboland, R. Effect of Micronutrient Deficiencies on Plants Stress Responses. In Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants; Ahmad, P., Prasad, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 283–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nakandalage, N.; Seneweera, S. Micronutrients Use Efficiency of Crop-Plants Under Changing Climate. In Plant Micronutrient Use Efficiency; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 209–224. ISBN 978-0-12-812104-7. [Google Scholar]
  94. Tiozon, R.J.N.; Fernie, A.R.; Sreenivasulu, N. Meeting Human Dietary Vitamin Requirements in the Staple Rice via Strategies of Biofortification and Post-Harvest Fortification. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Paraman, I.; Wagner, M.E.; Rizvi, S.S.H. Micronutrient and Protein-Fortified Whole Grain Puffed Rice Made by Supercritical Fluid Extrusion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11188–11194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Afzal, I.; Javed, T.; Amirkhani, M.; Taylor, A.G. Modern Seed Technology: Seed Coating Delivery Systems for Enhancing Seed and Crop Performance. Agriculture 2020, 10, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Farooq, M.; Usman, M.; Nadeem, F.; Rehman, H.U.; Wahid, A.; Basra, S.M.A.; Siddique, K.H.M. Seed Priming in Field Crops: Potential Benefits, Adoption and Challenges. Crop Pasture Sci. 2019, 70, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Khan, R.A. Response of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Zinc Sulphate and Copper Sulphate under Salt Stress. Pure Appl. Biol. 2020, 9, 2648–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Atar, B.; Uygur, V.; Sukuşu, E. Effects of Priming with Copper, Zinc and Phosphorus on Seed and Seedling Composition in Wheat and Barley. Türk Tarım Ve Doğa Bilim. Derg. 2020, 7, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Praharaj, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, V.K.; Chandra, R.; Guru, S.K.; Chaturvedi, S. Yield and Grain Zinc Concentration of Wheat as Affected by Nutri Priming and Foliar Application of Zinc. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 503–505. [Google Scholar]
  101. Rehman, A.; Farooq, M.; Ahmad, R.; Basra, S.M.A. Seed Priming with Zinc Improves the Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Wheat. Seed Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Basit, A.; Hussain, S.; Abid, M.; Zafar-ul-Hye, M.; Ahmed, N. Zinc and Potassium Priming of Maize (Zea mays L.) Seeds for Salt-Affected Soils. J. Plant Nutr. 2021, 44, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Seddigh, M.; Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H.; Ghasemi, S. The Effectiveness of Seed Priming with Synthetic Zinc-Amino Acid Chelates in Comparison with Soil-Applied ZnSO4 in Improving Yield and Zinc Availability of Wheat Grain. J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 39, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Ali, B.; Adrees, M.; Arshad, M.; Hussain, A.; Zia Ur Rehman, M.; Waris, A.A. Zinc and Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Improved the Plant Growth and Reduced the Oxidative Stress and Cadmium Concentration in Wheat. Chemosphere 2019, 214, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Van Nguyen, D.; Nguyen, H.M.; Le, N.T.; Nguyen, K.H.; Nguyen, H.T.; Le, H.M.; Nguyen, A.T.; Dinh, N.T.T.; Hoang, S.A.; Van Ha, C. Copper Nanoparticle Application Enhances Plant Growth and Grain Yield in Maize Under Drought Stress Conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 364–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Feng, X.; Ma, Q. Transcriptome and Proteome Profiling Revealed Molecular Mechanism of Selenium Responses in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Karimi, N.; Goltapeh, E.M.; Amini, J.; Mehnaz, S.; Zarea, M.J. Effect of Azospirillum zeae and Seed Priming with Zinc, Manganese and Auxin on Growth and Yield Parameters of Wheat, under Dryland Farming. Agric. Res. 2021, 10, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rasool, T.; Ahmad, R.; Farooq, M. Seed Priming with Micronutrients for Improving the Quality and Yield of Hybrid Maize. Gesunde Pflanz. 2019, 71, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hadia, E.; Slama, A.; Romdhane, L.; Cheikh M’Hamed, H.; Fahej, M.A.S.; Radhouane, L. Seed Priming of Bread Wheat Varieties with Growth Regulators and Nutrients Improves Salt Stress Tolerance Particularly for the Local Genotype. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 304–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Poudel, P.; Di Gioia, F.; Lambert, J.D.; Connolly, E.L. Zinc Biofortification through Seed Nutri-priming using Alternative Zinc Sources and Concentration Levels in Pea and Sunflower Microgreens. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1177844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gupta, N.; Ram, H.; Kumar, B. Mechanism of Zinc absorption in plants: Uptake, transport, translocation and accumulation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biol. Technol. 2016, 15, 89–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Carmona, V.M.V.; Filho, A.B.C.; de Almeida, H.J.; Silva, G.C.; dos Reis, A.R. Agronomic biofortification of beet plants with zinc via seed priming. Revista Caatinga. 2020, 33, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sharma, V.; Kharb, V.; Verma, V.; Dhaliwal, S.S.; Kalia, A.; Behera, S.K.; Singh, P. Comparative Potential of Different Fe Sources for Seed Priming to Enhance Yield and Iron Content in Direct Seeded Aerobic Rice. Cereal Res. Commun. 2024, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Majda, C.; Khalid, D.; Aziz, A.; Rachid, B.; Badr, A.-S.; Lotfi, A.; Mohamed, B. Nutri-Priming as an Efficient Means to Improve the Agronomic Performance of Molybdenum in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 661, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mirbolook, A.; Lakzian, A.; Sadaghiani, M.R. Fortification of Bread Wheat Using Synthesized Zn- Glycine and Zn-Alanine Chelates in Comparison with ZnSO4 in a Calcareous Soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2020, 51, 1048–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mirbolook, A.; Rasouli-Sadaghiani, M.; Sepehr, E.; Lakzian, A.; Hakimi, M. Synthesized Zn(II)-Amino Acid and -Chitosan Chelates to Increase Zn Uptake by Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 831–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hussaan, M.; Abbas, S.; Ali, Q.; Akram, M.S.; Tanwir, K.; Raza, A.; Hashmat, S.; Aqeel, M.; Chaudhary, H.J.; Javed, M.T. Elucidating the mechanistic role of Zinc-Lysine to enhance cd tolerance in diverse wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars through distinct morpho-physio-biochemical improvements under cd stress. J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 2023, 23, 5419–5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Babadi, M.A.; Masir, M.N.; Moezzi, A.A.; Taghavi, M.; Rahnama, A.; Razavi, B.S. Evaluation the efficiency of different application method of Fe aminochelates compared to FeSO4 on yield and quality traits of oleic Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in a calcareous soil. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 April 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Veena, M.; Puthur, J.T. Seed Nutripriming with Zinc Is an Apt Tool to Alleviate Malnutrition. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 44, 2355–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhao, A.; Mei, S.Y.; Wang, B.; Tian, X. Effects of ZnSO4 and Zn-EDTA applied by broadcasting or by banding on soil zn fractions and zn uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under greenhouse conditions. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 2019, 182, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dhaliwal, S.S.; Sharma, V.; Shukla, A.K.; Verma, V.; Kaur, M.; Shivay, Y.S.; Nisar, S.; Gaber, A.; Brestic, M.; Barek, V. Biofortification—A frontier novel approach to enrich micronutrients in field crops to encounter the nutritional security. Molecules 2022, 27, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zuluaga, M.Y.A.; Cardarelli, M.; Rouphael, Y.; Cesco, S.; Pii, Y.; Colla, G. Iron Nutrition in Agriculture: From Synthetic Chelates to Biochelates. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 312, 111833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Raza, A.; Tahir, M.A.; Sabah, N.-U.; Shah, S.H.; Sarwar, G.; Manzoor, M.Z. Seed Priming with Zinc Ion on Growth Performance and Nutrient Acquisition of Maize in Aridisols. Pak. J. Bot. 2023, 55, 1365–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Singh, N.K.; Rai, A.K. Enhancing Crop Productivity through Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies and Results. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2024, 46, 435–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Lee, J.H.; Kasote, D.M. Nano-Priming for Inducing Salinity Tolerance, Disease Resistance, Yield Attributes, and Alleviating Heavy Metal Toxicity in Plants. Plants 2024, 13, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gupta, N.; Rai, S.K.; Kumar, R.; Singh, P.M.; Chaubey, T.; Singh, V.; Behera, T.K. Seed priming with engineered nanomaterials for mitigating abiotic stress in plants. In Nanotechnology for Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Management in Crop Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 229–247. [Google Scholar]
  127. Gomes, D.G.; Pelegrino, M.T.; Ferreira, A.S.; Bazzo, J.H.; Zucareli, C.; Seabra, A.B.; Oliveira, H.C. Seed Priming with Copper-loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles Promotes Early Growth and Enzymatic Antioxidant Defense of Maize (Zea mays L.) Seedlings. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 2176–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Guha, T.; Gopal, G.; Das, H.; Mukherjee, A.; Kundu, R. Nanopriming with Zero-valent Iron Synthesized using Pomegranate peel Waste: A “green” Approach for Yield Enhancement in Oryza sativa L. cv. Gonindobhog. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 163, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Kasote, D.M.; Lee, J.H.J.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Patil, B.S. Seed Priming with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Modulate Antioxidant Potential and Defense-Linked Hormones in Watermelon Seedlings. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 5142–5151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Shahverdi, M.A.; Omidi, H.; Tabatabaei, S.J. Effect of Nutri-priming on Germination Indices and Physiological Characteristics of Stevia Seedling under Salinity Stress. J. Seed Sci. 2017, 39, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Pawar, V.A.; Laware, S.L. Seed Priming a Critical Review. Int. J. Sci. Res. Biol. Sci. 2018, 5, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Alejandro, S.; Höller, S.; Meier, B.; Peiter, E. Manganese in Plants: From Acquisition to Subcellular Allocation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kirby, T.W.; DeRose, E.F.; Cavanaugh, N.A.; Beard, W.A.; Shock, D.D.; Mueller, G.A.; Wilson, S.H.; London, R.E. Metal-Induced DNA Translocation Leads to DNA Polymerase Conformational Activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 2974–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bose, B.; Kumar, M.; Singhal, R.K.; Mondal, S. Impact of Seed Priming on the Modulation of Physico-Chemical and Molecular Processes During Germination, Growth, and Development of Crops. In Advances in Seed Priming; Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 23–40. ISBN 9789811300318. [Google Scholar]
  135. Johnson, R.; Puthur, J.T. Seed Priming as a Cost Effective Technique for Developing Plants with Cross Tolerance to Salinity Stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jisha, K.C.; Puthur, J.T. Seed Priming with BABA (β-Amino Butyric Acid): A Cost-Effective Method of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Reis, S.; Pavia, I.; Carvalho, A.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Correia, C.; Lima-Brito, J. Seed Priming with Iron and Zinc in Bread Wheat: Effects in Germination, Mitosis and Grain Yield. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 1179–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Carvalho, A.; Lino, A.; Alves, C.; Lino, C.; Vareiro, D.; Lucas, D.; Alfonso, G.; Costa, G.; Esteves, M.; Bezerra, M.; et al. Combination of Iron and Zinc Enhanced the Root Cell Division, Mitotic Regularity and Nucleolar Activity of Hexaploid Triticale. Plants 2023, 12, 2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Hera, M.H.R.; Hossain, M.; Paul, A.K. Effect of Foliar Zinc Spray on Growth and Yield of Heat Tolerant Wheat under Water Stress. Int. J. Biol. Environ. Eng. 2018, 1, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
  140. Hilo, A.; Shahinnia, F.; Druege, U.; Franken, P.; Melzer, M.; Rutten, T.; von Wirén, N.; Hajirezaei, M.R. A Specific Role of Iron in Promoting Meristematic Cell Division during Adventitious Root Formation. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4233–4247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mottonen, M.; Aphalo, P.J.; Lehto, T. Role of Boron in Drought Resistance in Norway Spruce (Picea abies) Seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2001, 21, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. El-Shintinawy, F. Structural and Functional Damage Caused by Boron Deficiency in Sunflower Leaves. Photosynthetica 1999, 36, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Salehi, H.; Cheheregani Rad, A.; Raza, A.; Djalovic, I.; Prasad, P.V.V. The Comparative Effects of Manganese Nanoparticles and Their Counterparts (Bulk and Ionic) in Artemisia annua Plants via Seed Priming and Foliar Application. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1098772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mondal, S.; Bose, B. Impact of Micronutrient Seed Priming on Germination, Growth, Development, Nutritional Status and Yield Aspects of Plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 2577–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Sundaria, N.; Singh, M.; Upreti, P.; Chauhan, R.P.; Jaiswal, J.P.; Kumar, A. Seed Priming with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Triggers Iron Acquisition and Biofortification in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Grains. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Choukri, M.; Abouabdillah, A.; Bouabid, R.; Abd-Elkader, O.H.; Pacioglu, O.; Boufahja, F.; Bourioug, M. Zn Application through Seed Priming Improves Productivity and Grain Nutritional Quality of Silage Corn. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 103456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rahman, M.T.; Idid, S.Z. Can Zn Be a Critical Element in COVID-19 Treatment? Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ajouri, A.; Asgedom, H.; Becker, M. Seed Priming Enhances Germination and Seedling Growth of Barley under Conditions of P and Zn Deficiency. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 2004, 167, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Imran, M.; Boelt, B.; Mühling, K.-H. Zinc Seed Priming Improves Salt Resistance in Maize. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2018, 204, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Imran, M.; Mahmood, A.; Römheld, V.; Neumann, G. Nutrient Seed Priming Improves Seedling Development of Maize Exposed to Low Root Zone Temperatures during Early Growth. Eur. J. Agron. 2013, 49, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Rehman, A.U.; Masood, S.; Khan, N.U.; Abbasi, M.E.; Hussain, Z.; Ali, I. Molecular Basis of Iron Biofortification in Crop Plants; A Step Towards Sustainability. Plant Breed. 2021, 140, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Iqbal, S.; Farooq, M.; Cheema, S.A.; Afzal, I. Boron Seed Priming Improves the Seedling Emergence, Growth, Grain Yield and Grain Biofortification of Bread Wheat. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2017, 19, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Hafeez, K.; Atif, M.; Perveen, S.; Parveen, A.; Akhtar, F.; Yasmeen, N. Unraveling the Contribution of Copper Seed Priming in Enhancing Chromium Tolerance in Wheat by Improving Germination, Growth, and Grain Yield. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Bhatia, P.; Gupta, M. Micronutrient Seed Priming: New Insights in Ameliorating Heavy Metal Stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 58590–58606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Subramanyam, K.; Du Laing, G.; Van Damme, E.J.M. Sodium Selenate Treatment Using a Combination of Seed Priming and Foliar Spray Alleviates Salinity Stress in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Dai, L.-Y.; Zhu, H.-D.; Yin, K.-D.; Du, J.-D.; Zhang, Y.-X. Seed Priming Mitigates the Effects of Saline-Alkali Stress in Soybean Seedlings. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 77, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Padhan, B.K.; Sathee, L.; Jain, V. Nitrogen Remobilization and Its Importance in Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) of Crops. Indian. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 90, 2251–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tuiwong, P.; Lordkaew, S.; Veeradittakit, J.; Jamjod, S.; Prom-u-thai, C. Seed Priming and Foliar Application with Nitrogen and Zinc Improve Seedling Growth, Yield, and Zinc Accumulation in Rice. Agriculture 2022, 12, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ji, C.; Li, J.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, L.; Shi, L.; Xu, F.; Cai, H. Zinc and Nitrogen Synergistic Act on Root-to-Shoot Translocation and Preferential Distribution in Rice. J. Adv. Res. 2022, 35, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Khan, F.; Hussain, S.; Khan, S.; Geng, M. Seed Priming Improved Antioxidant Defense System and Alleviated Ni-Induced Adversities in Rice Seedlings Under N, P, or K Deprivation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 565647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Khan, E.; Gupta, M. Arsenic–Silicon Priming of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seeds Influence Mineral Nutrient Uptake and Biochemical Responses through Modulation of Lsi-1, Lsi-2, Lsi-6 and Nutrient Transporter Genes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Khan, F.; Hussain, S.; Tanveer, M.; Khan, S.; Hussain, H.A.; Iqbal, B.; Geng, M. Coordinated Effects of Lead Toxicity and Nutrient Deprivation on Growth, Oxidative Status, and Elemental Composition of Primed and Non-Primed Rice Seedlings. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 21185–21194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Pereira, E.G.; Ribeiro De Lima, B.; Alves Medeiros, L.R.; Ribeiro, S.A.; Bucher, C.A.; Santos, L.A.; Fernandes, M.S.; Vieira Rossetto, C.A. Nutripriming with Ammonium Nitrate Improves Emergence and Root Architecture and Promotes an Increase in Nitrogen Content in Upland Rice Seedlings. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 102331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Singhal, R.K.; Pandey, S.; Bose, B. Seed Priming with Mg(NO3)2 and ZnSO4 Salts Triggers Physio-Biochemical and Antioxidant Defense to Induce Water Stress Adaptation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Stress 2021, 2, 100037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Umair Hassan, M.; Aamer, M.; Umer Chattha, M.; Haiying, T.; Shahzad, B.; Barbanti, L.; Nawaz, M.; Rasheed, A.; Afzal, A.; Liu, Y.; et al. The Critical Role of Zinc in Plants Facing the Drought Stress. Agriculture 2020, 10, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Afshari, F.; Nakhaei, F.; Mosavi, S.; Seghatoleslami, M. Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni to Nutri-Priming and Foliar Nutrition under Water Supply Restrictions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 176, 114399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Thomas, D.T.; Puthur, J.T. Amplification of Abiotic Stress Tolerance Potential in Rice Seedlings with a Low Dose of UV-B Seed Priming. Funct. Plant Biol. 2019, 46, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Hussain, S.; Ahmed, S.; Akram, W.; Li, G.; Yasin, N.A. Selenium Seed Priming Enhanced the Growth of Salt-Stressed Brassica rapa L. through Improving Plant Nutrition and the Antioxidant System. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1050359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Ye, Y.; Cota-Ruiz, K.; Hernández-Viezcas, J.A.; Valdés, C.; Medina-Velo, I.A.; Turley, R.S.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Manganese Nanoparticles Control Salinity-Modulated Molecular Responses in Capsicum annuum L. through Priming: A Sustainable Approach for Agriculture. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 1427–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Moatter, K. Effects of Seed Priming with PbSO4 and FeSO4 on Germination and Growth of Seedlings of Beta vulgaris L. under NaCl Stress. Pure Appl. Biol. 2020, 9, 1405–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Khan, R.A.; Khan, A.; Qadri, T.A. Influence of Seed Priming with FeSO4 on Germination, Growth and Biochemical Aspects of Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) Grown under NaCl Stress. J. Biosci. Appl. Res. 2019, 5, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Goiba, P.K.; Durgude, A.; Pharande, A.; Kadlag, A.; Chauhan, M.; Nimbalkar, C. Effect of Seed Priming with Iron and Zinc on Yield Contributing Parameters as Well as the Nutrient Uptake of the Soybean (Glycine max) in Calcareous Soil. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2018, 6, 758–760. [Google Scholar]
  173. Gorzi, A.; Omidi, H.; Bostani, A.B. Morpho-Physiological Responses of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) to Various Priming Treatments Under Drought Stress. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2018, 16, 4753–4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Gorzi, A.; Omidi, H.; Bostani, A. Effect of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) Seed Priming Treatments with Salicylic Acid, Iron, and Zinc on Some Germination Traits and Photosynthetic Pigments under Drought Stress. Iran. J. Seed Res. 2020, 6, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Gulmezoglu, N.; Aydogan, C.; Turhan, E. Physiological, Biochemical and Mineral Dimensions of Green Bean genotypes Depending on Zn Priming and Salinity. Legume Res. 2016, 39, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Iqbal, S. Influence of Seed Priming with CuSO4 and ZnSO4 on Germination and Seedling Growth of Oat under NaCl Stress. Pure Appl. Biol. 2020, 9, 897–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Nautiyal, N.; Shukla, K. Evaluation of Seed Priming Zinc Treatments in Chickpeas for Seedling Establishment Under Zinc Deficient Conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2013, 36, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Imran, M.; Mahmood, A.; Neumann, G.; Boelt, B. Zinc Seed Priming Improves Spinach Germination at Low Temperature. Agriculture 2021, 11, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Nawaz, F.; Zulfiqar, B.; Ahmad, K.S.; Majeed, S.; Shehzad, M.A.; Javeed, H.M.R.; Tahir, M.N.; Ahsan, M. Pretreatment with Selenium and Zinc Modulates Physiological Indices and Antioxidant Machinery to Improve Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 138, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Candan, N.; Cakmak, I.; Ozturk, L. Zinc-biofortified Seeds Improved Seedling Growth under Zinc Deficiency and Drought Stress in Durum Wheat. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 2018, 181, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Fallah, S.; Malekzadeh, S.; Pessarakli, M. Seed Priming Improves Seedling Emergence and Reduces Oxidative Stress in Nigella sativa under Soil Moisture Stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2018, 41, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Farooq, M.; Almamari, S.A.D.; Rehman, A.; Al-Busaidi, W.M.; Wahid, A.; Al-Ghamdi, S.S. Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Aspects of Zinc Seed Priming-Induced Drought Tolerance in Faba Bean. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 281, 109894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Muhammad, I.; Volker, R.; Günter, N. Accumulation and Distribution of Zn and Mn in Soybean Seeds after Nutrient Seed Priming and Its Contribution to Plant Growth under Zn- and Mn-Deficient Conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 695–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Emam, M.M.; Khattab, H.E.; Helal, N.M. Effect of Selenium and Silicon on Yield Quality of Rice Plant Grown under Drought Stress. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2014, 8, 596–605. [Google Scholar]
  185. Nawaz, F.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Ahmad, R.; Waraich, E.A.; Shabbir, R.N.; Bukhari, M.A. Supplemental Selenium Improves Wheat Grain Yield and Quality through Alterations in Biochemical Processes under Normal and Water Deficit Conditions. Food Chem. 2015, 175, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Nawaz, F.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Ahmad, R.; Waraich, E.A. Selenium (Se) Seed Priming Induced Growth and Biochemical Changes in Wheat Under Water Deficit Conditions. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2013, 151, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Begum, N.; Hamayun, M.; Rahman, I.U.; Ijaz, F.; Sohail, Z.I.; Afzal, M.; Ullah, A.; Karim, S. Influence of Seed Priming with ZnSO4 and CuSO4 on Germination and Seedling Growth of Brassica rapa under Nacl Stress. Middle East. J. Sci. Res. 2014, 22, 879–885. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Different methods used in agronomic biofortification. (A) Application of exogenous organic/inorganic fertilizers or biofertilizers directly to soils (soil fertilization), (B) seed soaking in micronutrient solutions (seed priming), and (C) foliar pulverization (foliar feeding).
Figure 1. Different methods used in agronomic biofortification. (A) Application of exogenous organic/inorganic fertilizers or biofertilizers directly to soils (soil fertilization), (B) seed soaking in micronutrient solutions (seed priming), and (C) foliar pulverization (foliar feeding).
Agronomy 14 01415 g001
Figure 2. Different methods used in nutri-priming.
Figure 2. Different methods used in nutri-priming.
Agronomy 14 01415 g002
Figure 3. Mechanisms underlying seed nutri-priming at germination phase (A), vegetative (B), and reproductive (C) stages.
Figure 3. Mechanisms underlying seed nutri-priming at germination phase (A), vegetative (B), and reproductive (C) stages.
Agronomy 14 01415 g003
Table 1. Diversity of the nutri-priming agents used for biofortification. For the same agent, concentration and exposure time depend on the species and the experimental context.
Table 1. Diversity of the nutri-priming agents used for biofortification. For the same agent, concentration and exposure time depend on the species and the experimental context.
Priming Agent FormConcentrationDurationReference
ZnSO4100–200 ppm
0.3 and 0.5%
0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7%
0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 M
4 mM
 
1 h
10 h
6 h
12 h
24 h
 
 
[98]
[99]
[100]
[101]
[102]
 
ZnCl20.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 M12 h[101]
Zn(Gln), Zn(Arg), Zn(His)40 mg Zn kg−1 soil12 h[103]
ZnO NPs0, 25, 50, 75, 100 mg/L24 h[104]
CuSO4100–200 ppm
0.03 and 0.06%
1 h
10 h
[98]
[99]
CUO-NPs3.33, 44.4, 5.55 mg/L8 h[105]
Na2SeO410 μM30 mn, 24 h[106]
MnSO40.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4%6 h[107]
H3BO30.01%8 h[108]
FeEDTA50 µmol/L12 h[109]
Fe NPs0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mg/L24 h[104]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Houmani, H.; Ben Slimene Debez, I.; Turkan, I.; Mahmoudi, H.; Abdelly, C.; Koyro, H.-W.; Debez, A. Revisiting the Potential of Seed Nutri-Priming to Improve Stress Resilience and Nutritive Value of Cereals in the Context of Current Global Challenges. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071415

AMA Style

Houmani H, Ben Slimene Debez I, Turkan I, Mahmoudi H, Abdelly C, Koyro H-W, Debez A. Revisiting the Potential of Seed Nutri-Priming to Improve Stress Resilience and Nutritive Value of Cereals in the Context of Current Global Challenges. Agronomy. 2024; 14(7):1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071415

Chicago/Turabian Style

Houmani, Hayet, Imen Ben Slimene Debez, Ismail Turkan, Henda Mahmoudi, Chedly Abdelly, Hans-Werner Koyro, and Ahmed Debez. 2024. "Revisiting the Potential of Seed Nutri-Priming to Improve Stress Resilience and Nutritive Value of Cereals in the Context of Current Global Challenges" Agronomy 14, no. 7: 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071415

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop