Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Dissection of Metabolites in Response to Low Phosphorus Stress in Different Root-Type Alfalfa at Seedling Stage
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of QTLs and Candidate Genes for Red Crown Rot Resistance in Two Recombinant Inbred Line Populations of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/agronomy14081696
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Heat Shock Protein 20 (HSP20) Gene Family in Response to High-Temperature Stress in Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)

by
Sushuang Liu
1,
Yizhou Wu
1,
Yang Li
2,
Zaibao Zhang
1,
Dandan He
1,
Jianguo Yan
3,
Huasong Zou
1 and
Yanmin Liu
1,*
1
Department of Life Sciences and Health, Huzhou College, Huzhou 313000, China
2
College of Life Science, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China
3
Huzhou Lvteng Ecological Agriculture Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(8), 1696; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081696
Submission received: 3 July 2024 / Revised: 25 July 2024 / Accepted: 30 July 2024 / Published: 1 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Legume Genetics and Genomics from Mendelian to NGS Era)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) are an important legume crop known for their rich nutrient content, including proteins, carbohydrates, and minerals. Thus, they are enjoyed by people worldwide. In recent years, the production scale of chickpeas has been growing gradually. The planting area of chickpeas represents roughly 35–36% of the total planting area, and the output of the beans is roughly 47–48%. However, the growth and development process of chickpeas is limited by a number of factors, including high temperature, drought, salt stress, and so forth. In particular, high temperatures can reduce the germination rate, photosynthesis, seed setting rate, and filling rate of chickpeas, restricting seed germination, plant growth, and reproductive growth. These changes lead to a decrease in the yield and quality of the crop. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are small proteins that play an important role in plant defense against abiotic stress. Therefore, in the present study, HSP20 gene family members were identified based on the whole-genome data of chickpeas, and their chromosomal positions, evolutionary relationships, promoter cis-acting elements, and tissue-specific expression patterns were predicted. Subsequently, qRT-PCR was used to detect and analyze the expression characteristics of HSP20 genes under different temperature stress conditions. Ultimately, we identified twenty-one HSP20 genes distributed on seven chromosomes, and their gene family members were found to be relatively conserved, belonging to ten subfamilies. We also found that CaHSP20 promoter regions have many cis-acting elements related to growth and development, hormones, and stress responses. In addition, under high-temperature stress, the relative expression of CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-3, and CaHSP20-12 increased hundreds or even thousands of times as the temperature increased from 25 °C to 42 °C. Among them, excluding CaHSP20-5, the other five genes all contain 1-2 ABA cis-regulatory elements. This finding indicates that CaHSP20s are involved in the growth and development of chickpeas under heat stress, and the mechanisms of their responses to high-temperature stress may be related to hormone regulation. The results of the present study lay the foundation for exploring HSP20 gene family resources and the molecular mechanisms of heat resistance in chickpeas. Our results can also provide a theoretical basis for breeding high-temperature-resistant chickpea varieties and provide valuable information for the sustainable development of the global chickpea industry.

1. Introduction

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are evolutionarily ancient, highly conserved, and ubiquitously present across various organisms, including archaea, prokaryotes, and eukaryotes [1]. These proteins enhance stress tolerance under adverse environmental conditions such as salinity, elevated temperatures, heavy metal exposure, and drought. HSPs achieve this by stabilizing cellular structures, facilitating the transport and proper folding of proteins, and maintaining essential cellular functions [2,3,4,5].
HSPs are categorized into six classes based on their molecular weights: HSP110, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, HSP40, and HSP20 [6]. Among these, HSP20, also called small heat shock proteins (sHSPs), have a molecular weight predominantly ranging from 15 to 25 kDa [7]. Subcellular localization studies have further classified HSP20 into five subfamilies. The cytoplasmic subfamily (CI-CVI) is found in the cytoplasm or nucleus, while the mitochondrial subfamily (MTI and MTII) resides in the mitochondria. Additionally, the ER, CP, and PX subfamilies are localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplasts, and peroxisomes, respectively [8]. All members of the HSP20 family have a highly conserved α-crystallin structural domain (ACD) located in the C-terminal region, which is encoded by approximately ninety amino acids and contains multiple β-strand structures, an opposite sequence of 80–100 amino acids and two conserved regions: the CRI (N-terminal consensus region I) and the CRII (C-terminal consensus region II) [9,10]. In recent years, with the improvement and development of genome-sequencing technology, the HSP20 gene family has gradually been comprehensively identified and analyzed in different species, such as grapes [11], tomato [12], watermelon [13], African bermudagrass [14], and Prunus mume [15]. HSP20, abundant in plants, is the most commonly produced protein under heat stress and is widely involved in plants’ response to biotic and abiotic stresses [16]. Overexpression of the small heat shock protein gene (OSHSP18.6) in rice results in reduced malondialdehyde levels and increased catalase and superoxide dismutase activity [17]. Overexpression of sHSP in cucurbit crops inhibits viral RNA accumulation and delays disease progression [18]. Overexpression of a small heat shock protein gene (RcHSP17.8) from the rose of China in tobacco increased the tolerance of recombinant strains and transgenic tobacco to abiotic stresses [19]. In Arabidopsis, overexpression of AtHSP17.6A and AtHSP17.6C resulted in rapid accumulation under high-temperature stress and showed enhanced heat tolerance [20]. Furthermore, transgenic plants (MsHSP16.9 and TaHSP23.9) demonstrated robust growth at elevated temperatures and conferred a protective effect on Arabidopsis [21,22]. Thus, HSP20 plays an important positive role in ameliorating abiotic stress in plants.
Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.), the world’s third most-produced legume, are cultivated in over fifty countries worldwide and are renowned for their high nutritional value, including proteins, carbohydrates, and minerals [23]. In recent years, the effects of high temperatures on chickpea growth and development have become increasingly evident as a consequence of global warming [24,25,26]. High temperatures reduce chickpea yields by reducing pollen viability [27] and stigma receptivity [28] during flowering and pod development, leading to fertilization failure. High temperatures also affect the grain filling period, leading to reduced yield and quality [28]. During the reproductive growth stage, high temperatures may affect the development of floral organs and the viability of pollen, which can lead to poor pollination and fertilization and subsequently reduce the rate of fructification. However, although the HSP20 gene family has been reported in many plants, the mechanism of action of the HSP20 gene family under heat stress in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) is unclear. Therefore, an in-depth study on the whole-genome identification of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas under high-temperature stress has important theoretical and practical significance for revealing the response mechanism of chickpeas under heat stress and breeding varieties with high-temperature tolerance. In this study, we identified chickpea HSP20 family genes and systematically analyzed the phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, structural domains, chromosomal locations, and cis-acting elements, which are expected to provide a reference for unraveling the functions of the HSP20 family members in the regulation of chickpea development and stress response.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of the HSP20 Gene Family Members in Chickpeas

Chickpea genome and protein sequences were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile of Hsp20 (PF00011) downloaded from the Pfam protein family database (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 28 September 2023) was used to identify putative chickpea Hsp20 genes in the chickpea genome using HMMER 3.0 (E-value < 1 × 10−3). Additionally, Phytozome (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/, accessed on 28 September 2023) was used to search for candidate genes using the terms “Hsp20” and “small heat shock protein” as a complementary approach [29]. After removing all of the repeating and redundant sequences, the output putative Hsp20 protein sequences were submitted to Pfam, SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 28 September 2023), and CDD (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi, accessed on 28 September 2023) to identify whether the candidate sequence contained the Hsp20 (PF00011) domain. The candidates, HSP20 genes, identified from chickpeas, were named according to their corresponding physical map locations. The isoelectric point (PI) and molecular weight (MW) of HSP20 proteins were analyzed using the Compute pI/Mw tool (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/, accessed on 28 September 2023) [30]. The ProtParam tool 2 was used to predict the number of amino acids, the total average hydrophilicity stability index, the fat coefficient, and the instability index [31].

2.2. Chromosomal Distribution, Gene Duplication Event, Synteny Analyses, Gene Structure, and the Conserved Domain of CaHSP20s

Chromosome information was obtained from Phytozome, and a chromosomal location map of the genes was generated using TBtools (v.1.120) [32]. The gene structures of CaHSP20 were created using the website Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS 2.0, https://gsds.gao-lab.org/Gsds_help.php, accessed on 27 October 2023) [33]. The conserved motifs of the CaHSP20s were identified using the online MEME database (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 27 October 2023) [34], and local software, TBtools (v.1.120), was used for visualization [32]. Using the BLASTN results, gene duplications were identified with MCScanX. The repeated events of these genes were visualized using Circos (v.1.121) [35]. MCScanX (cscore ≥ 0.7) was used to detect and show common blocks between chickpeas and other plant genomes. Finally, TBtools (v.1.120) was used for visualization [32].

2.3. Protein–Protein Interaction Network of CaHSP20s

Based on the protein sequences of the twenty-one identified CaHSP20 genes, the complete set of corresponding representative transcript protein sequences was searched on the STRING database (https://cn.string-db.org/, accessed on 20 July 2024). Representative protein sequence sets and protein interaction network relationships of Arabidopsis thaliana were downloaded from the STRING database. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of CaHSP20s was analyzed using TBtools (v.1.120) [32]. The analysis results were subsequently imported into Cytoscape (v3.9.1) software for visualization.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis of HSP20s

The HSP20 amino acid sequences of Arabidopsis [36,37], soybeans [38], and peanuts [39] were downloaded and combined with the identified CaHSP20 protein sequences for multiple alignments, which were performed using ClustalW (v.2.0.11). First, all protein sequences were aligned using MAFFT (version 7). Second, a rootless neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 11 with default parameters and 1000 bootstrap tests. Finally, CaHSP20 genes were divided into subgroups based on the classification of HSP20 in other species and the topology of the phylogenetic tree. The tree was later colored using iTOL (http://itol.embl.de/, accessed 25 October 2023).

2.5. Prediction of Promoter Cis-Elements of CaHSP20s

The promoter sequence upstream of the transcription start site of each CaHSP20s gene, which is 1.5 kb in length, was extracted from the chickpea genome database and analyzed using PlantCARE online software (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 27 October 2023) [40] to predict the putative cis-acting regulatory elements. The related phytohormone and/or stress responses were further analyzed, as described previously [30]. The results of the promoter analysis were visualized using TBtools (v.1.120) [32].

2.6. The Analysis of Tissue Expression Profile for CaHSP20s Genes

To determine the expression profiles of CaHSP20s in the different tissues of chickpeas, a comparative analysis of published RNA-sequencing data (series accession number GSE147831) [41] was conducted (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36261617/, accessed on 5 May 2024). First, the downloaded RNA sequencing data were converted to fastq format via FASTq-dump within SRA toolkit 3.0.0. The sequenced clean reads were then compared with the chickpeas’ genome data. Sequence assembly was performed using HISAT2 (v.2.1.0), and the FPKM values were calculated using StringTie2 (v.2.1.5) [42,43]. Different tissues in the chickpeas were selected, including the root, mature leaf, young leaf, flower, seed, SAM, embryo, and endosperm. TBtools (v.1.120) [32] was used to draw heat maps to observe the expression level of CaHSP20s.

2.7. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The chickpea seeds were sterilized in 3% sodium hypochlorite and then washed five times using distilled water. Seeds were pre-germinated on moist filter paper in a Petri dish for 48 h at 25 °C in the dark, and pre-germinated seeds were planted into each pot containing soil and vermiculite (2:1 ratio). The plants were grown at 25 ± 1 °C with a 16 h/8 h (light/dark), as described by Pandey et al. [44]. The chickpea seedlings at twenty-one days old were used for the high-temperature stress experiments. The chickpea seedlings were treated with heat at temperatures of 28 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C. Samples of leaves and stems were collected immediately before heat treatments (0 h), as well as at 24 and 48 h after the high-temperature stress, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored frozen at −80 °C until use.

2.8. RNA Isolation and Real-Time PCR Analysis

The total RNA was extracted from leaves and stems of chickpeas using a HiPure Universal RNA Mini Kit (MGBio, Shanghai, China), and reverse transcription was performed using the MonScript™ RTIII Super Mix with dsDNase (Monad Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The quantitative PCR of the target genes was carried out on a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) using MonAmp™ ChemoHS qPCR Mix (Monad Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The relative mRNA expression levels were determined using a comparative threshold cycle (CT) method [45], and the data were from three independent biological replicates. The primers for quantitative real-time PCR assays are listed in Supplementary File S3.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All of the experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results are presented as the means ± standard deviations (SDs). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Characterization of CaHSP20s Gene Family

In this study, the HSP20 gene family of chickpeas was identified using the HSP20 protein sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana and rice (Supplementary File S1) to construct a hidden Markov model (HMM). As a result, twenty-one HSP20 genes were identified in chickpeas and named CaHSP20-1 to CaHSP20-21 according to their positions in the genome (Table 1). The genomic mRNA of the identified HSP20S ranged from 396 to 1191 bp. The amino acid residue numbers of the putative HSP20 proteins varied from 131 to 242, the coding sequence of the CaHSP20 proteins varied from 396 to 729 bp, and their isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (MW) ranged from 5.24 to 9.35 and 15.15 to 27.46 kDa, respectively (Table 1). The instability index and hydropathy index of the CaHSP20 proteins varied from 30.45 (CaHSP20-5) to 63.28 (CaHSP20-16) and from −0.84 (CaHSP20-11) to −0.25 (CaHSP20-13), respectively (Table 1).

3.2. Chromosome Location, Gene Duplication Event, and Synteny Analyses of CaHSP20s Family

The CaHSP20 genes were found to be unevenly distributed across seven chickpea chromosomes (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Chromosome 2 contained four CaHSP20s, chromosome 5 contained five CaHSP20s, and chromosome 6 contained eight CaHSP20s. The remaining four chromosomes each harbored only one CaHSP20 gene (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The locations of the CaHSP20 repeat sequences in the chickpea genome were analyzed, revealing that five (23.8%) of the CaHSP20 genes exhibited tandem repeats. As shown in Figure 1, four pairs of segmental duplications were identified on chromosomes 5 and 6: CaHSP20-10/CaHSP20-11, CaHSP20-17/CaHSP20-18, CaHSP20-17/CaHSP20-19, and CaHSP20-18/CaHSP20-19 (Figure 1 and Figure 2). There are no segmental duplicate gene pairs on the same and different chromosomes of CaHSP20, as shown in Figure 2. We also compared homologous blocks of the chickpea, soybean, peanut, and Arabidopsis genomes and found that many HSP20 genes are homologous (Figure 3). Twenty-seven CaHSP20 genes were homologous to soybean genes, twenty-three were homologous to peanut genes, and seven were homologous to Arabidopsis genes (Figure 3). The number of collinear gene pairs between chickpeas and other members of the legume family (soybeans or peanuts) was found to be greater than that between distantly related Arabidopsis thaliana, with the HSP20 gene family of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and soybeans (Glycine max) having the most homologous gene pairs. This finding suggests that chickpeas and soybeans are more closely related, which is consistent with the phylogenetic analysis results. The divergence times of these repeats were determined by calculating the Ka/Ks ratios. Tandem repeat events were found to have occurred within the last fifty-three million years (MYA), with all CaHSP20 paralogs undergoing purifying selection (Ka/Ks < 1) (Table 2). These results indicate that tandem duplication events have played a significant role in the expansion of the CaHSP20 gene family in chickpeas. The observation of purifying selection suggests that these genes have conserved their functions over time, likely contributing to the plant’s adaptation to various environmental stresses.

3.3. Construction of the Protein Interaction Networks of the CaHSP20s Family

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis is an important method for studying the relationship between proteins. It can help us to understand the interactions between proteins and their role in cellular processes. By analyzing the connections in the network, interactions between different proteins can be revealed [46,47]. In the present study, the STRING database was used to construct the PPI network of the chickpea CaHSP20 family, with a total of 13 members participating in network construction (Figure 4). It is clear from the network that CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-8, CaHSP20-15, and CaHSP20-12 interact most closely with other members, indicating that they may be key members involved in responding to heat stress and maintaining cell homeostasis. In particular, CaHSP20-8, which is in the core region, interacts with multiple genes (CaHSP20-1, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-9, CaHSP20-10, CaHSP20-5, CaHSP20-12, CaHSP20-15, CaHSP20-11, CaHSP20-13). These interacting proteins are of great significance for further study of the role of CaHSP20s in chickpeas under various stress conditions.

3.4. Phylogenetic Analysis of the CaHSP20s Gene Family in Chickpeas

To investigate the evolutionary relationships and classification of HSP20 family genes, a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed with full-length protein sequences of twenty-one CaHSP20 proteins, nineteen AtHSP20 proteins, thirty-three GmHSP20, and twenty-seven AdHSP20 proteins (Figure 5). The CaHSP20 proteins were divided into ten subgroups, including nine CI, three P, two CII, and one each of PO, CVI, MI, ER, CV, CIV, and CIII based on previously reported results and phylogeny analysis [48] (Figure 5). The concentration of HSP20s was evident in chickpeas, Arabidopsis, soybeans, and peanuts. From an evolutionary perspective, chickpeas and soybeans are the most closely genetically related, followed by peanuts and Arabidopsis. Roughly half of the CaHSP20s were localized in the cytoplasm or nucleus, meaning that they mainly play roles in the cytosol.

3.5. Gene Structure, Conserved Motifs, and Sequence Analysis of CaHSP20s Family

To fully understand the diverse functions of these CaHSP20 proteins, their conserved motifs were analyzed using the Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) suite (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 28 September 2023). As shown in Figure 6, a total of 10 conserved motifs (Motifs 1–10) were detected in the protein sequences of CaHSP20s. The MEME analysis, combined with phylogenetic tree data, indicated significant variability in motif structures between different phylogenetic groups, whereas members within the same group displayed similar motif compositions and arrangements. Specifically, each CaHSP20 protein consistently featured Motifs 1 and 2. Motif 7 was uniquely associated with subgroups P and MI, while Motifs 4 and 6, as well as Motif 10, were specific to subgroups CI and CVI. This pattern suggests that CaHSP20 proteins within the same subgroup likely share similar functional roles due to their conserved domain structures. Conversely, differences in motif composition among subgroups imply functional diversification among these proteins. An analysis of the exon–intron structure of CaHSP20s showed that all members of the CaHSP20 genes contained only one or two exons. Different CaHSP20 genes in each subgroup exhibit similar exon–intron structures, suggesting they are highly conserved and have close evolutionary relationships (Figure 7).

3.6. Promoter Analysis of CaHSP20s Genes

To explore the potential function and regulatory mechanisms of the CaHSP20 genes, the cis-acting elements within the 2000 bp promoter sequences of CaHSP20s were analyzed using the PlantCARE database. The analysis revealed several phytohormone and stress response-related cis-acting elements, including the MeJA Response Element (MeJARE), Anaerobic Response Element (ARE), ABA Response Element (ABRE), Drought Response Element (DRE), Low-Temperature Responsive Element (LTRE), Gibberellin Response Element (GARE), Defense and Stress Response Element (DSRE), SA Response Element (SARE), and Auxin Response Element (AuxRE) (Figure 8). Among the twenty-one CaHSP20, fourteen contain ARE elements, nine contain DRE elements, seventeen contain ABA elements, twelve contain MeJA elements, eight contain GARE and LTRE elements, five contain SA elements, ten contain AuxRE elements, and seven contain DSRE elements (Figure 8). These results suggest that the CaHSP20 genes may play roles in various plant hormone signaling pathways and stress responses, indicating their potential involvement in the plant’s mechanisms of adaptation to environmental stimuli.

3.7. Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns of CaHSP20s Genes

To further investigate the expression patterns of CaHSP20s in chickpeas, their expression profiles across various tissues, including the roots, stems, leaves, buds, capsules, apices, calli, and seedlings, were analyzed using publicly available RNA sequencing data (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36261617/, accessed on 5 May 2024). The results of tissue-specific expression analysis showed significant differences in the constitutive-specific expression of CaHSP20 gene family members in different tissues (Figure 9). The heat map shows the expression patterns of twenty-one CaHSP20 genes in different organs divided into eight groups. Sixteen out of twenty-one CaHSP20s were expressed in at least one tissue tested (Figure 9). Notably, five genes (CaHSP20-2, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-12, CaHSP20-13, and CaHSP20-17) were detected in all examined tissues with ≥1.0 mapped reads per million (FPKM) per kilobase transcript fragment (Figure 9 and Supplementary File S2). Additionally, four genes (CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-13, CaHSP20-2, and CaHSP20-7) exhibited high expression levels in chickpea leaves (FPKM ≥ 3.0), with CaHSP20-17 and CaHSP20-13 showing particularly high expression levels at FPKM ≥ 256.0 and FPKM ≥ 165.2, respectively (Figure 9 and Supplementary File S2). In the flowering tissues of the chickpeas, five genes (CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-13, CaHSP20-2, CaHSP20-7, and CaHSP20-12) demonstrated high expression levels (FPKM ≥ 3.0), including CaHSP20-13 at FPKM ≥ 338.8 and CaHSP20-17 at FPKM ≥ 248.4 (Figure 9 and Supplementary File S2). These data suggest that each CaHSP20 gene has a tissue-specific expression pattern, which may be related to their function in regulating plant growth and development and the stress response.

3.8. Expression Profiling of CaHSP20s Genes under Heat Stress Treatment

To explore the potential function of CaHSP20s in response to heat stress, the expression of CaHSP20s in the leaves and stems of heat-treated chickpeas was analyzed using qRT-PCR. The observations revealed that the expression levels of 10 CaHSP20 genes (CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-13, CaHSP20-9, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-11, CaHSP20-2, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-12, and CaHSP20-5) were sensitive to heat stress, with their relative expression levels gradually increasing as the temperature rose from 25 °C to 42 °C. In the leaves, the expression levels of most CaHSP20s were highest within a short period (Figure 10A). Among these genes, CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-3, and CaHSP20-5 from the CI group exhibited the greatest increases in expression. This suggests that CI group genes play a significant role in responding to heat stress (Figure 10A). In addition, the relative expression heat maps of these 10 CaHSP20 genes were constructed using relative expression values to assess their expression levels under heat stress (Figure 10B,D). Compared with the 0 h treatment, all CaHSP20s were upregulated to varying degrees after the 42 °C heat stress treatment. As shown in Figure 10C, the relative expression levels of CaHSP20-9, CaHSP20-13, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-12, and CaHSP20-5 genes in the stems reached their peak after the time increased to 24 h under the condition of 37 °C. When the temperature was 42 °C, the relative expression levels of CaHSP20-3 and CaHSP20-5 showed an increasing trend with the increase in time, differing from the trend that the expression levels of other genes first increased and then slowly decreased. The relative expression level of CaHSP20-3 increased by about 10,000 times at 24 h and 48 h (compared with 0 h), and the relative expression level of CaHSP20-5 increased by about 8000 times at 24 h and 9000 times at 48 h. In the leaves (Figure 10A,B), the relative expression content of most genes did not change much when treated at 25 °C for 24 h and 48 h compared with 0 h, while the relative expression content of CaHSP20-9 increased significantly when treated at 25 °C for 48 h. The expression levels of CaHSP20-13, CaHSP20-11, CaHSP20-2, and CaHSP20-7 peaked after treatment at 48 °C for 24 h. In the entire process of heat stress, the expression levels of six genes, including CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-12, and CaHSP20-5, were always high in the leaves and stems. CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-5, CaHSP20-17, and CaHSP20-20 were clustered into the CI group; in comparison, the other three genes were scattered in the ER and P groups, indicating that these genes may have great significance in the response of chickpeas to heat stress. Overall, our findings indicate that most CaHSP20 genes are responsive to heat stress, highlighting their potential importance in heat stress tolerance in chickpeas.

4. Discussion

HSP20, as a class of molecular chaperones, is ubiquitous and simultaneously plays a central role in biotic and abiotic stress resistance [49,50]. Recent studies have reported the genome-wide identification and systemic functional analysis of the HSP20 gene family in various plant species, including grapes [11], tomatoes [12], watermelons [13], African bermudagrass [14], apples [48], and other species [50,51]. In this study, we systematically identified twenty-one HSP20 genes in chickpeas and grouped them into 10 subfamilies based on their phylogenetic clades and amino acid sequences (Figure 2). This classification is consistent with previous reports on HSP20 in other plant species, confirming the conserved nature of these genes across different species [11,15,16,50,51]. Instability is considered to be the common feature of stress protein [52], which may be associated with the CaHSP20 gene and can be found quickly during induction.
Furthermore, this classification of CaHSP20s was also supported by conserved domain, motif, and gene structure analyses showing that each subfamily shares similar domains, motifs, and exon–intron structures (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Conserved domain and motif analyses showed that all the identified CaHSP20s had a typical ACD domain, and most CaHSP20 family members in the same category had similar motif types and numbers (Figure 6); previous research has shown that the HSP20 genes may exhibit different biological functions, which could be dependent on the types and numbers of motifs [12,51]. When plants respond to various stresses, genes with few or no introns are rapidly activated to respond to external stimuli promptly [53]. Analysis of the exon–intron structure of CaHSP20s revealed that all members of the CaHSP20 gene family contain only one or two exons. Among them, thirteen genes were found to contain only one exon, eight genes contained two exons and different CaHSP20 genes in each subgroup showed similar exon–intron structures. In soybean species, most GmHsp20 gene members contain one or two exons (sixteen genes contain one exon, sixteen genes contain two exons, and one gene contains three exons). Different GmHsp20 genes in each subfamily exhibit similar exon–intron structures. In peanuts, six members of the AdHSP20 gene contain one exon, fifteen members of the AdHSP20 gene contain two exons, and six members of the AdHSP20 gene possess between 3 and 11 exons. Through analysis, the exon–intron structures of chickpeas, soybeans, and peanuts showed similarities and close evolutionary relationships (Figure 7). This finding suggests the conservation of the gene structures of the HSP20 family in plants. Transcription factors (TFs) play a crucial role in regulating plant growth, development, and stress resistance through the control of gene expression [54]. To obtain additional information about the regulation of CaHSP20s, we explored the cis-acting elements in their 2.0 kb promoter regions. Several cis-acting elements with phytohormone and/or stress response were identified, namely, MeJARE, ARE, ABRE, DRE, LTRE, GARE, DSRE, SARE, and AuxRE, which indicates that the CaHSP20 family members may widely be involved in responses to various phytohormone and/or stress in plants to exert their biological function (Figure 8). This wide range of cis-acting elements is consistent with the range in previous studies on the stress-responsive functions of HSP20 genes in plants [10,52]. Among the nine common plant hormones in plants, five of them, including ABA, auxin, BR, GA, and MeJA, play significant roles in the response to heat stress [55]. Among them, MeJA represents the highest number, with forty-four in total. MeJA transcription factors, as one of the most widely distributed transcription factor families in plants, have been proven to play a key role in plant stress responses, especially under abiotic stresses such as high temperatures [56]. When plants are subjected to high-temperature stress, MeJA can protect the cell membrane by enhancing the activity of some antioxidant enzymes and enhancing the osmotic regulation ability of cells. MeJA may increase the expression of genes responding to high-temperature stress, and it is speculated that the CaHsp20 gene family is involved in the response to high-temperature stress by regulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes in cells. Therefore, we suggest that CaHsp20 plays an important role in chickpeas’ response to heat stress.
It has been shown that gene duplication events, which include segmental and tandem duplications, are essential in genomic rearrangement and frequently cause the expansion of a gene family [57,58]. In this study, four tandem duplication pairs were involved in gene duplications (Table 2), indicating that segmental duplication may be the predominant gene-duplication event in the expansion of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas. This finding is also consistent with a previous study showing that tandem duplication contributes to HSP20 gene family expansion during evolution [57]. In our study, Ka/Ks ratios of both segmentally and tandemly duplicated gene pairs were significantly less than 1, suggesting that purifying selection plays a predominant role in the evolution of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas.
Gene expression patterns frequently provide crucial information regarding gene functions [59,60]. Tissue expression of the Hsp20 gene in plants has been detected and analyzed in several species, including soybeans, peanuts, apples, and pumpkins [3,38,39,48]. Therefore, the expression levels of CaHSP20 in the root, stem, leaf, bud, capsule, apice, calli, and seedling tissues were determined using public RNA-Seq data [41]. The results indicated that most CaHSP20 genes were expressed in various tissues and are involved in the development of various plant tissues (Figure 10), suggesting their essential roles in chickpea growth and development. This result corroborates previous studies in which HSP20 was shown to have important role functions in plant growth and development [11,12,13,48,50,51]. However, most CaHsp20 genes are underexpressed at all stages of development, and only a few genes are highly expressed in specific organs or during development. The same results have also been reported in cotton, and it is speculated that the CaHsp20 gene in chickpeas has a similar function to GhHsp20 in cotton and is part of a complex transcriptional network that regulates stamen development [61]. Five genes (CaHSP20-2, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-12, CaHSP20-13, and CaHSP20-17) were found to be highly expressed in all tissues. This finding is similar to the results for SlHsp17.7A, SlHsp17.6B, SlHsp17.6C, and SlHsp24.54 genes in tomatoes, meaning that these five genes may have specific housekeeping functions in chickpea cells under normal growth conditions [30]. However, the expression of some CaHsp20 genes in different tissues varies. For example, the expression levels of CaHSP20-4 and CaHSP20-6 were found to be relatively high in seeds but low in leaves, at almost 0, indicating that these CaHsp20 genes are mainly involved in the growth and development of chickpea seeds. As an important reproductive organ of chickpeas, these CaHsp20 genes still accumulate specifically in seeds without stress, thus further indicating that CaHSP20 plays a crucial role in maintaining cell homeostasis during meiosis, fertilization, and seed formation [62]. There is no uniform expression pattern of the CaHSP20 gene in chickpeas, indicating that different CaHSP20 proteins in chickpeas may have diversified functions in plant growth, development, and stress response. This finding supports the idea that there is no uniform expression pattern for all HSP20 genes in plants, consistent with results obtained in Arabidopsis, rice, and capsicum [49].
The results of a study on the potato HSP20 gene showed that the relative expression levels of fourteen StHsp20 genes were significantly upregulated by more than a hundred-fold in response to heat stress [50]. Analysis of soybean HSP20 gene expression also indicated that most CmHsp20 genes are highly induced in roots and leaves, and the expression level was found to be much higher than that of the control group [38]. Similarly, the gene expression analysis conducted in the present study showed that six genes, including CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-12, and CaHSP20-5, possessed higher expression levels in the leaves and stems under high-temperature stress. Compared with the 0 h control group, their content increased by a hundred or even a thousand times. The expression levels of most of the above genes were significantly upregulated between 25 °C and 42 °C with the increase in temperature and treatment time, indicating that these six genes play an important role in the heat stress response of chickpeas. Studies on the HSP20 gene in pumpkin showed that the relative expression levels of six Hsp20 genes (CmoHsp20-7, CmoHsp20-13, CmoHsp20-18, CmoHsp20-22, CmoHsp20-26, and CmoHsp20-32) were extremely upregulated after 3 h of heat stress [3]. In the present study, CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-5, CaHSP20-7, and CaHSP20-20 genes that significantly responded to high-temperature stress were clustered into the CI group; in comparison, CaHSP20-3 and CaHSP20-12 were distributed in the ER and P groups.
Moreover, certain CaHSP20 genes, such as CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-13, CaHSP20-2, and CaHSP20-7, exhibited significantly higher expression levels in leaves; similarly, CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-13, CaHSP20-2, CaHSP20-7, and CaHSP20-12 showed elevated expression in flowering tissues (Figure 9). These tissue-specific expression patterns suggest potential functional specializations of these genes, indicating their significant roles in these particular tissues. In the results of the analysis of relative gene expression levels, these ten CaHSP20 genes were found to contain ABA, DRE, LTRE, and other abiotic stress response elements, and most of the genes were found to contain cis-regulatory elements related to abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellin (GARE), AuxRE, and other hormones. Among them, CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-12, and CaHSP20-5 genes from CI, ER, and P families possessed high expression levels in the leaves and stems in response to high-temperature stress. Moreover, almost all contain plant hormones, such as abscisic acid (ABA). Plant hormones are key signaling compounds that regulate plant growth, development, and stress responses. The expression levels of these genes were significantly upregulated when the leaves and stems were subjected to high temperatures, indicating that the response to high-temperature stress may be related to the regulation of hormones. This finding is consistent with the conclusion of previous studies in that auxin, abscisic acid, gibberellin, brassinosterol, and jasmonic acid play important roles in plant heat stress response [55]. CaHSP20-3 also contains DSRE elements related to defense and stress. When treated at 42 °C, the expression level of CaHSP20-3 is upregulated with the increase in treatment time. It is speculated that CaHSP20-3’s positive response to high-temperature stress may be related to DSRE and other elements.
Recent projections indicate that the Earth’s global average temperature will rise by 1.5 °C within two decades. Studies have demonstrated that for each 1 °C increase in the average annual temperature, yields of key crops such as rice, wheat, and maize decrease by 3–8 percent [63]. Consequently, investigating plants’ response mechanisms to high-temperature stress and enhancing heat tolerance in crops is imperative for ensuring global food security and fostering human development. Heat shock proteins, particularly HSP20, play a vital role in coping with extreme temperatures [59,64,65]. To determine whether CaHSP20 genes are involved in chickpea heat tolerance, we analyzed their expression profiles in leaves using RNA-Seq data with FPKM values of ≥0.3. The qRT-PCR results indicated that the expression of CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-13, CaHSP20-9, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-11, CaHSP20-2, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-12, and CaHSP20-5 was significantly upregulated under high-temperature stress in chickpeas. Additionally, their relative expression levels increased progressively with rising temperatures (25–42 °C), showing a consistent trend in both leaf and stem tissues (Figure 10). These findings suggest a role for these CaHSP20 genes in responding to high-temperature stress. The rapid upregulation observed in these CaHSP20 genes may be attributed to their compact gene structures, which have fewer introns. Previous research has shown that genes with such compact structures can facilitate rapid and timely responses to various plant stresses [66]. Remarkably, the relative expression levels of CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-7, CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-12, and CaHSP20-5 increased by hundreds or even thousands of times as temperatures rose from 25 °C to 42 °C. These six CsHSP20 genes appear primarily involved in the heat stress response pathway and represent potential candidate genes for breeding heat-tolerant chickpea varieties. CaHSP20s contribute not only to the formation of heat tolerance but also play significant roles in the broader process of plant adaptations to environmental changes.
In the present study, the expression pattern of the CaHSP20 gene family provides genetic options for solving the issue of poor growth due to high-temperature stress in chickpeas using molecular breeding methods. For example, CaHSP20-17, CaHSP20-20, CaHSP20-3, CaHSP20-12, and CaHSP20-5 showed consistently high expression levels throughout the heat stress process, suggesting that these five genes may be important in the response of chickpeas to heat stress. The analysis of cis-acting elements in the promoter region provides a theoretical basis for further analysis of the regulatory mechanisms of other factors on CaHSP20s; anaerobic-induced cis-acting elements, drought-induced elements, and other stress-related cis-acting elements may be transcription factor binding sites. The presence of many hormone-related cis-acting elements suggests that CaHSP20s may be closely related to hormone regulation or signal transduction. However, these speculations require further investigation.

5. Conclusions

In the study presented herein, a comprehensive analysis of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas was conducted at a genome-wide level, with a total of twenty-one CaHSP20 genes being identified. These genes were found to be distributed unevenly across seven chromosomes and were categorized into ten subfamilies based on their evolutionary relationships. To further investigate the evolutionary connections among HSP20 gene family members, the structure, conserved motifs, cis-acting elements, protein interaction networks, and homology of these genes were investigated. Additionally, the expression patterns of CaHSP20s in various organs and under different stress conditions were studied using qRT-PCR, offering insights for future research on the roles of HSP20 genes. The results of the present study provide a theoretical basis for analyzing the molecular regulatory mechanisms under heat stress and provide a basis for identifying important candidate HSP20 genes involved in chickpeas’ response to heat stress.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy14081696/s1. Supplementary File S1: The HSP20 protein sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana and rice; Supplementary File S2: Tissue expression profiles of CaHSP20; Supplementary File S3: The primers used for quantitative real-time PCR assays.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and data analyses were performed by S.L., Y.W., Y.L. (Yang Li), J.Y., Z.Z., H.Z., D.H., and Y.L. (Yanmin Liu) The first draft of the manuscript was written by S.L., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Huzhou public welfare application research project (Grant No. 2021GZ26), the 2024 Higher Education Research Program by the Zhejiang Province Association of Higher Education (Grant No. KT2024035), the Scientific Research Fund of the Zhejiang Provincial Education Department (Grant No. Y202248468), the National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates (Grant No. 202313287004; 202313287010), and Zhejiang students’ technology and innovation program (Xin Miao talents program) (Grant No. 2024R438A003).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the experimental materials provided by bread of life farm.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Jianguo Yan was employed by the company Huzhou Lvteng Ecological Agriculture Company Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Richter, K.; Haslbeck, M.; Buchner, J. The heat shock response: Life on the verge of death. Mol. Cell. 2010, 40, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ding, X.; Guo, Q.; Li, Q.; Liu, P.; Liang, G.; Lu, W.; Liu, Z.; Wu, H.; Lin, J.; Gu, C.; et al. Comparative transcriptomics analysis and functional study reveal important role of high-temperature stress response gene GmHSFA2 during flower bud development of CMS-based F1 in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 600217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Celik, E.N.Y.; Baloglu, M.C.; Ayan, S. Gene expression profiles of Hsp family members in different poplar taxa under cadmium stress. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2021, 45, 102–110. [Google Scholar]
  4. Xiang, J.; Chen, X.; Hu, W.; Xiang, Y.; Yan, W.; Zhang, S.; Guo, Z. Overexpressing heat-shock protein OsHSP50.2 improves drought tolerance in rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1585–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Lu, Q.; Wen, X.; Lu, C. The combined effect of salt stress and heat shock on proteome profiling in Suaeda salsa. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 1743–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tran, N.H.T.; Oguchi, T.; Matsunaga, E.; Tanaka, S.; Shimizu, S.; Ueda, M.; Kawamoto, H.; Sato, H.; Sano, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Transcriptional enhancement of a bacterial choline oxidase A gene by an HSP terminator improves the glycine betaine production and salinity stress tolerance of Eucalyptus camaldulensis trees. Plant Biotechnol. 2018, 35, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Waters, E.R.; Vierling, E. Plant small heat shock proteins–evolutionary and functional diversity. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mahmood, T.; Safdar, W.; Abbasi, B.H.; Ahmad, T.; Abbasi, R. An overview on the small heat shock proteins. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 927–939. [Google Scholar]
  9. Carra, S.; Alberti, S.; Benesch, J.L.P.; Boelens, W.; Buchner, J.; Carver, J.A.; Ecroyd, H.; Gusev, N.; Hohfeld, J.; Kampinga, H.H.; et al. Small heat shock proteins: Multifaceted proteins with important implications for life. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2019, 24, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pandey, B.; Kaur, A.; Gupta, O.P.; Shukla, R.; Sharma, I. Identification of HSP20 gene family in wheat and barley and their differential expression profiling under heat stress. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 175, 2427–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ji, X.R.; Yu, Y.H.; Ni, P.Y.; Zhang, G.H.; Xu, G.H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.F.; He, L.L.; Li, X.G. Genome-wide identification of small heat-shock protein (Hsp20) gene family in grape and expression profile during berry development. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. González-Gordo, S.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Small Heat Shock Protein (sHSP) Gene Family from Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Fruits: Involvement in Ripening and Modulation by Nitric Oxide (NO). Plants 2023, 12, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ramakrishna, G.; Singh, A.; Kaur, P.; Pareek, A.; Singh, P.; Sharma, S.; Yadav, G.; Sharma, N.K.; Pareek, A. Genome wide identification and characterization of small heat shock protein gene family in pigeonpea and their expression profiling during abiotic stress conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 197, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tao, P.; Guo, W.L.; Li, B.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.J.; Guo, J.K.; Huang, J.Z.; Zhang, X.L. Genome-wide identification, classification, and expression analysis of sHSP genes in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp pekinensis). Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 11975–11993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Guo, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y. Genome-wide identification and classification of the Hsf and sHsp gene families in Prunus mume, and transcriptional analysis under heat stress. Peer J. 2019, 7, e7312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, X.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, L.; Qian, Y.; Xue, Y. Isolation of the Chinese rose sHSP gene promoter and its differential regulation analysis in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 1145–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khaskheli, G.B.; Zuo, F.; Yu, R.; Chen, S. Overexpression of small heat shock protein enhances heat-and salt-stress tolerance of bifidobacterium longum NCC2705. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 71, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, S.; Liu, L.; Aranda, M.A.; Peng, B.; Gu, Q. Expression and localization patterns of a small heat shock protein that interacts with the helicase domain of cucumber green mottle mosaic virus. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 1648–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, C.; Bi, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, R.; Feng, S.; Ming, F. A small heat shock protein gene (RcHSP17.8) from Chinese rose confers resistance to various abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 141, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kotak, S.; Larkindale, J.; Lee, U.; von Koskull-Döring, P.; Vierling, E.; Scharf, K.D. Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Wei, T.; Che, S.; Zhang, L.; Hu, B.; Long, H.; Song, W.; et al. Identification of MsHsp20 gene family in Malus sieversii and functional characterization of MsHsp16.9 in heat tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, J.; Gao, X.; Dong, J.; Tian, X.; Wang, J.; Palta, J.A.; Xu, S.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Z. Over-expression of the heat-responsive wheat gene TaHSP23.9 in transgenic Arabidopsis conferred tolerance to heat and salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sari, H.; Uhdre, R.; Wallace, L.; Abraham, R.; Nguyen, T.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, A.; Bansal, S.; Singh, R.; Gupta, A. Genome-wide association study in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for yield and nutritional components. Euphytica 2024, 220, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saget, S.; Costa, M.; Barilli, E.; Barros, A.; Benn, T.; Amaral, L.; Ulbricht, C.; Coussa, E.; MacDonald, B. Substituting wheat with chickpea flour in pasta production delivers more nutrition at a lower environmental cost. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020, 24, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bampidis, V.A.; Christodoulou, V. Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) in animal nutrition: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 168, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Merga, B.; Haji, J. Economic importance of chickpea: Production, value, and world trade. Cogent Food Agric. 2019, 5, 1615718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Devasirvatham, V.; Gaur, P.M.; Mallikarjuna, N.; Tokachichu, R.N.; Trethowan, R.M.; Tan, D.K.Y. Effect of high temperature on the reproductive development of chickpea genotypes under controlled environments. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kumar, P.; Yadav, S.; Singh, M.P. Bioregulators application improved heat tolerance and yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by modulating zeaxanthin cycle. Plant Physiol. Rep. 2020, 25, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dattilo, S.; Mancuso, C.; Koverech, G.; Di Mauro, P.; Ontario, M.L.; Petralia, C.C.; Petralia, A.; Maiolino, L.; Serra, A.; Calabrese, E.J.; et al. Heat shock proteins and hormesis in the diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Immun. Ageing 2015, 12, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Feng, K.; Ruan, M.; Ye, Q.; Wang, R.; Li, Z.; Zhou, G.; Yao, Z.; Yang, Y.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling of Tomato Hsp20 Gene Family in Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant. 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W39–W49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Siddique, M.; Gernhard, S.; von Koskull-Döring, P.; Vierling, E.; Scharf, K.D. The plant sHSP superfamily: Five new members in Arabidopsis thaliana with unexpected properties. Cell Stress Chaperones 2008, 13, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Scharf, K.D.; Siddique, M.; Vierling, E. The expanding family of Arabidopsis thaliana small heat stress proteins and a new family of proteins containing α-crystallin domains (Acd proteins). Cell Stress Chaperones 2001, 6, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xu, L.; He, H.T.; Liu, H.R.; Lin, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.M.; Wang, Z.B.; Liu, S.S. Bioinformatics analysis of soybean Hsp20 gene family and analysis of response to high temperature and high humidity stress. Soybean Sci. 2023, 5, 565–578. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  39. Jiang, H.H.; Zhang, J.M.; He, H.H.; Li, L.M.; Wu, Q.Y.; Huang, X.; Wang, T. Identification and expression characteristics analysis of HSP 20 gene family in peanut. J. Zhaoqing Univ. 2022, 5, 6–14. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  40. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jain, M.; Bansal, J.; Rajkumar, M.S.; Garg, R. An integrated transcriptome mapping the regulatory network of coding and long non-coding RNAs provides a genomics resource in chickpea. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, D.; Paggi, J.M.; Park, C.; Bennett, C.; Salzberg, S.L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kovaka, S.; Zimin, A.V.; Pertea, G.M.; Razaghi, R.; Salzberg, S.L.; Pertea, M. Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pandey, A.; Sharma, P.; Mishra, D.; Dey, S.; Malviya, R.; Gayen, D. Genome-wide identification of the fibrillin gene family in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its response to drought stress. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhou, J.; Xiong, W.; Wang, Y.; Guan, J. Protein Function Prediction Based on PPI Networks: Network Reconstruction vs Edge Enrichment. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 758131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yao, F.; Song, C.; Wang, H.; Song, S.; Jiao, J.; Wang, M.; Zheng, X.; Bai, T. Genome-wide characterization of the HSP20 gene family identifies potential members involved in temperature stress response in Apple. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 609184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Waters, E.R. The evolution, function, structure, and expression of the plant sHSPs. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, P.; Wang, D.; Wang, R.; Kong, N.; Zhang, C.; Yang, C.; Wu, W.; Ma, H.; Chen, Q. Genome-wide analysis of the potato Hsp20 gene family: Identification, genomic organization and expression profiles in response to heat stress. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gao, T.; Mo, Z.; Tang, L.; Yu, X.; Du, G.; Mao, Y. Heat Shock Protein 20 Gene Superfamilies in Red Algae: Evolutionary and Functional Diversities. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 817852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lopes-Caitar, V.S.; de Carvalho, M.C.; Darben, L.M.; Kuwahara, M.K.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Dias, W.P.; Abdelnoor, R.V.; Marcelino-Guimarães, F.C. Genome-wide analysis of the Hsp20 gene family in soybean: Comprehensive sequence, genomic organization and expression profile analysis under abiotic and biotic stresses. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jeffares, D.C.; Penkett, C.J.; Bähler, J. Rapidly regulated genes are intron poor. Trends Genet. 2008, 24, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Su, L.; Wan, S.; Zhou, J.; Shao, Q.S.; Xing, B. Transcriptional regulation of plant seed development. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 2013–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Waadt, R.; Seller, C.A.; Hsu, P.K.; Takahashi, Y.; Munemasa, S.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 680–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhu, Y.H.; Zhang, M.J.; Dong, C.M. Effects of exogenous MeJA on the antioxidant system and stress genes of Pinellia ternata under high temperature stress. Bull. Bot. Res. 2021, 1, 67–73. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, R.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, C.; Zhao, H.; Wu, Y.; Yang, G.; He, G. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of glutathione transferase gene family under multiple stresses and hormone treatments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ri, H.C.; An, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhou, J.N.; Zheng, D.; Wu, H.; Wang, P.; Yang, J.; et al. Deletion and tandem duplications of biosynthetic genes drive the diversity of triterpenoids in Aralia elata. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Guo, M.; Liu, J.H.; Liu, J.P.; Zhai, Y.F.; Wang, H.; Gong, Z.H.; Wang, S.B.; Lu, M.H. Genome-wide analysis of the CaHsp20 gene family in pepper: Comprehensive sequence and expression profile analysis under heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, H.X.; Zhu, W.C.; Feng, X.H.; Jin, J.H.; Wei, A.M.; Gong, Z.H. Transcription Factor CaSBP12 Negatively Regulates Salt Stress Tolerance in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ma, W.; Zhao, T.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Fang, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, T. Identification and characterization of the GhHsp20 gene family in Gossypium hirsutum. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Deng, Y.; Zheng, H.; Yan, Z.; Liao, D.; Li, C.; Zhou, J.; Liao, H. Full-length transcriptome survey and expression analysis of Cassia obtusifolia to discover putative genes related to aurantio-obtusin biosynthesis, seed formation and development, and stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Masson-Delmotte, V.; Zhai, P.; Pirani, A.; Connors, S.L.; Péan, C.; Berger, S.; Caud, N.; Chen, Y.; Goldfarb, L.; Gomis, M.I.; et al. Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. In Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, F.; Song, C.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yi, M.; Ma, N.; Zhou, X.; He, J. Small HSPs play an important role in crosstalk between HSF-HSP and ROS pathways in heat stress response through transcriptomic analysis in lilies (Lilium longiflorum). BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sun, Y.; Hu, D.; Xue, P.; Wan, X. Identification of the DcHsp20 gene family in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) and functional characterization of DcHsp17.8 in heat tolerance. Planta 2022, 256, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ren, X.Y.; Vorst, O.; Fiers, M.W.; Stiekema, W.J.; Nap, J.P. In plants, highly expressed genes are the least compact. Trends Genet. 2006, 22, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Agronomy 14 01696 g001
Figure 1. Chromosomal locations of CaHSP20 genes. Tandemly duplicated genes are indicated in red. Chromosome numbers are shown at the top of each bar. The scale presented on the left indicates chromosome sizes in megabases (Mb).
Figure 1. Chromosomal locations of CaHSP20 genes. Tandemly duplicated genes are indicated in red. Chromosome numbers are shown at the top of each bar. The scale presented on the left indicates chromosome sizes in megabases (Mb).
Agronomy 14 01696 g001
Agronomy 14 01696 g002
Figure 2. Homology of the CaHSP20 gene. Gray lines indicate all homology blocks in the chickpea genome.
Figure 2. Homology of the CaHSP20 gene. Gray lines indicate all homology blocks in the chickpea genome.
Agronomy 14 01696 g002
Agronomy 14 01696 g003
Figure 3. Synchronization analysis of the HSP20 gene in chickpeas with three other representative plants (soybean, peanut, and Arabidopsis). (A) Chickpeas and soybeans. (B) Chickpeas and peanuts. (C) Chickpeas and Arabidopsis. Gray lines indicate significant blocks of co-linearity within and between plant genomes; red lines indicate homologous HSP20 gene pairs. Chromosome numbers are indicated at the top of each chromosome.
Figure 3. Synchronization analysis of the HSP20 gene in chickpeas with three other representative plants (soybean, peanut, and Arabidopsis). (A) Chickpeas and soybeans. (B) Chickpeas and peanuts. (C) Chickpeas and Arabidopsis. Gray lines indicate significant blocks of co-linearity within and between plant genomes; red lines indicate homologous HSP20 gene pairs. Chromosome numbers are indicated at the top of each chromosome.
Agronomy 14 01696 g003
Agronomy 14 01696 g004
Figure 4. Schematic depicting the protein interaction network of caHSP20s. Each node represents a protein, and each edge represents an interaction. Purple lines represent experimentally validated protein interactions, green lines represent protein interactions predicted based on gene neighborhoods, blue lines represent protein interactions predicted based on gene co-occurrence, and black lines represent protein co-expression.
Figure 4. Schematic depicting the protein interaction network of caHSP20s. Each node represents a protein, and each edge represents an interaction. Purple lines represent experimentally validated protein interactions, green lines represent protein interactions predicted based on gene neighborhoods, blue lines represent protein interactions predicted based on gene co-occurrence, and black lines represent protein co-expression.
Agronomy 14 01696 g004
Agronomy 14 01696 g005
Figure 5. Phylogenetic analysis of HSP20 proteins from chickpeas, Arabidopsis, soybeans, and peanuts. The full length of the amino acid sequences of twenty-one CaHSP20 proteins, nineteen AtHSP20 proteins, thirty-three GmHSP20 proteins, and twenty-seven AdHSP20 proteins were aligned using the MUSCLE program in MEGA 11.0, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 11.0 using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic analysis of HSP20 proteins from chickpeas, Arabidopsis, soybeans, and peanuts. The full length of the amino acid sequences of twenty-one CaHSP20 proteins, nineteen AtHSP20 proteins, thirty-three GmHSP20 proteins, and twenty-seven AdHSP20 proteins were aligned using the MUSCLE program in MEGA 11.0, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 11.0 using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Agronomy 14 01696 g005
Agronomy 14 01696 g006
Figure 6. A schematic diagram of phylogenetic relationships and conserved motifs of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates for each branch using MEGA 11.0. Conserved motifs were identified using Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME). A model exhibition of 10 motif compositions in CaHSP20 complete amino acid sequences was prepared using MEME.XML (v.5.5.5) through TBtools (v.1.120). Each conserved motif is represented by a specific color box and corresponds one-to-one in the structural diagram. The locations of different motifs are proportional to their sequence lengths.
Figure 6. A schematic diagram of phylogenetic relationships and conserved motifs of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates for each branch using MEGA 11.0. Conserved motifs were identified using Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME). A model exhibition of 10 motif compositions in CaHSP20 complete amino acid sequences was prepared using MEME.XML (v.5.5.5) through TBtools (v.1.120). Each conserved motif is represented by a specific color box and corresponds one-to-one in the structural diagram. The locations of different motifs are proportional to their sequence lengths.
Agronomy 14 01696 g006
Agronomy 14 01696 g007
Figure 7. A schematic diagram of phylogenetic relationships and gene structure of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates for each branch using MEGA 11.0. The gene structure of the CaHSP20s diagrammatic was produced using TBtools (v.1.120), with the coding sequence (CDS) represented by a green box and the intron shown as a black line.
Figure 7. A schematic diagram of phylogenetic relationships and gene structure of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates for each branch using MEGA 11.0. The gene structure of the CaHSP20s diagrammatic was produced using TBtools (v.1.120), with the coding sequence (CDS) represented by a green box and the intron shown as a black line.
Agronomy 14 01696 g007
Agronomy 14 01696 g008
Figure 8. A schematic representation of molecular phylogenetic relationships and 2000 bp promoters of HSP20 in chickpeas. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates for each branch using MEGA 11.0. The 2000 bp promoter sequences of CaHSP20s were analyzed using PlantCARE and visualized using TBtools (v.1.098661). Differently colored boxes represent different cis-acting elements.
Figure 8. A schematic representation of molecular phylogenetic relationships and 2000 bp promoters of HSP20 in chickpeas. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates for each branch using MEGA 11.0. The 2000 bp promoter sequences of CaHSP20s were analyzed using PlantCARE and visualized using TBtools (v.1.098661). Differently colored boxes represent different cis-acting elements.
Agronomy 14 01696 g008
Agronomy 14 01696 g009
Figure 9. Expression profile of CaHSP20 genes in eight different tissues: roots, stems, leaves, buds, capsules, apices, calli, and seedlings of chickpeas. Transcriptome data for CaHSP20s gene tissue expression analysis were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/, accessed on 5 May 2024) under the accession number GSE147831. The heatmap was constructed using each gene Log2 (FPKM + 1) values via TBtools (v.1.120), ranging from a low expression level (blue) to a high expression level (red).
Figure 9. Expression profile of CaHSP20 genes in eight different tissues: roots, stems, leaves, buds, capsules, apices, calli, and seedlings of chickpeas. Transcriptome data for CaHSP20s gene tissue expression analysis were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/, accessed on 5 May 2024) under the accession number GSE147831. The heatmap was constructed using each gene Log2 (FPKM + 1) values via TBtools (v.1.120), ranging from a low expression level (blue) to a high expression level (red).
Agronomy 14 01696 g009
Agronomy 14 01696 g010
Figure 10. The relative expression levels of chickpea HSP20 genes. (A) The relative expression level of the HSP20 gene in the leaves at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C, and (C) The relative expression level of the HSP20 gene in the stems at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C. All data shown are the means and SDs of three biological replicates. The asterisks indicate the significance level (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001) based on Duncan’s multiple range test. (B,D) Heat maps of CaHSP20 gene expression in the leaves and stems at different times under heat stress (25 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C), respectively. The graph size and color represent the expression level of each gene in each sample.
Figure 10. The relative expression levels of chickpea HSP20 genes. (A) The relative expression level of the HSP20 gene in the leaves at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C, and (C) The relative expression level of the HSP20 gene in the stems at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C. All data shown are the means and SDs of three biological replicates. The asterisks indicate the significance level (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001) based on Duncan’s multiple range test. (B,D) Heat maps of CaHSP20 gene expression in the leaves and stems at different times under heat stress (25 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C), respectively. The graph size and color represent the expression level of each gene in each sample.
Agronomy 14 01696 g010
Table 1. Structural and biochemical features of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas.
Table 1. Structural and biochemical features of the HSP20 gene family in chickpeas.
NameGene IDChrGene StartGene EndStrandmRNA
(bp)		CDS
(bp)		Protein
(aa)		pIMW
(kDa)		Instability IndexHydropathy Index
CaHSP20-1Ca_06952Chr011599941716000315reverse8995821935.7322.4334.09−0.69
CaHSP20-2Ca_10257Chr023264198232642736forward7556332109.1624.4437.68−0.83
CaHSP20-3Ca_12525Chr023024208030242541reverse4624621536.8517.4441.85−0.66
CaHSP20-4Ca_14336Chr022902341329024198reverse7864201397.0315.4846.12−0.34
CaHSP20-5Ca_14692Chr0251920055192424forward4204201395.9615.8630.45−0.55
CaHSP20-6Ca_19633Chr031851554918516052reverse5045041677.2719.4448.30−0.81
CaHSP20-7Ca_12168Chr0437021223702712reverse5915911966.4522.7141.12−0.57
CaHSP20-8Ca_04038Chr054593102945931899forward8716902297.6726.0339.09−0.66
CaHSP20-9Ca_11311Chr054296908542970157forward10737292429.3527.4657.14−0.72
CaHSP20-10Ca_01653Chr053574049135740964forward4744741575.7917.6342.36−0.45
CaHSP20-11Ca_01654Chr053573808335738649forward5675671885.4621.3740.02−0.84
CaHSP20-12Ca_20062Chr052277708322778273forward11915761916.3222.0843.37−0.77
CaHSP20-13Ca_16264Chr065410415254104622forward4714711565.9017.6243.35−0.25
CaHSP20-14Ca_13815Chr064506257745062972forward3963961315.4915.1541.72−0.75
CaHSP20-15Ca_15814Chr063462237134623153forward7836242075.6723.3061.30−0.60
CaHSP20-16Ca_14594Chr062763584527636312forward4684681555.5617.8763.28−0.73
CaHSP20-17Ca_06336Chr061717249917172921forward4234231405.2415.6942.04−0.73
CaHSP20-18Ca_06335Chr061717163417172116forward4834831605.5718.4162.45−0.71
CaHSP20-19Ca_06334Chr061716390717164389reverse4834831605.8218.3858.18−0.68
CaHSP20-20Ca_05301Chr061518899315189463reverse4714711566.1917.8652.39−0.71
CaHSP20-21Ca_16176Chr073356596333566633forward6714501497.7916.9747.51−0.62
Bp: base pair. aa: amino acid. CDS: coding sequence. pI: isoelectric point. MW: molecular weight.
Table 2. Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks values for the duplication gene pairs from.
Table 2. Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks values for the duplication gene pairs from.
Seq1Seq2KaKsKa/Ks RatioDate (MY)Duplication Type
CaHSP10CaHSP110.3271.0050.32533.500Tandem
CaHSP19CaHSP180.0080.1170.0683.898Tandem
CaHSP19CaHSP170.2531.2300.20640.985Tandem
CaHSP18CaHSP170.2471.5760.15752.539Tandem
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; He, D.; Yan, J.; Zou, H.; Liu, Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Heat Shock Protein 20 (HSP20) Gene Family in Response to High-Temperature Stress in Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Agronomy 2024, 14, 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081696

AMA Style

Liu S, Wu Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, He D, Yan J, Zou H, Liu Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Heat Shock Protein 20 (HSP20) Gene Family in Response to High-Temperature Stress in Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Agronomy. 2024; 14(8):1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Sushuang, Yizhou Wu, Yang Li, Zaibao Zhang, Dandan He, Jianguo Yan, Huasong Zou, and Yanmin Liu. 2024. "Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Heat Shock Protein 20 (HSP20) Gene Family in Response to High-Temperature Stress in Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)" Agronomy 14, no. 8: 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081696

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop