Next Article in Journal
Germline CNV Detection through Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) Data Analysis Enhances Resolution of Rare Genetic Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Tumor Necrosis Factor-α G-308A Polymorphism and Sporadic IgA Nephropathy: A Meta-Analysis Using a Genetic Model-Free Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 7
10.3390/genes14071489
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of DNA Methylation in the Development and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in the General Population: An Epigenome-Wide Association Study Using the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Database

by
Ji-Eun Kim
1,†,
Min-Jee Jo
1,†,
Eunjung Cho
1,
Shin-Young Ahn
1,
Young-Joo Kwon
1,
Jeong-An Gim
2,* and
Gang-Jee Ko
1,*
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea
2
Medical Science Research Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2023, 14(7), 1489; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071489
Submission received: 14 June 2023 / Revised: 13 July 2023 / Accepted: 19 July 2023 / Published: 21 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epigenetics: Mechanisms in Toxicology and Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Although knowledge of the genetic factors influencing kidney disease is increasing, epigenetic profiles, which are associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), have not been fully elucidated. We sought to identify the DNA methylation status of CpG sites associated with reduced kidney function and examine whether the identified CpG sites are associated with CKD development. Method: We analyzed DNA methylation patterns of 440 participants in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) with estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline. CKD development was defined as a decrease in the eGFR of <60 at any time during an 8-year follow-up period (“CKD prediction” analysis). In addition, among the 440 participants, 49 participants who underwent a second methylation profiling were assessed for an association between a decline in kidney function and changes in the degree of methylation of CpG sites during the 8 years (“kidney function slope” analysis). Results: In the CKD prediction analysis, methylation profiles of a total of 403,129 CpG sites were evaluated at baseline in 440 participants, and increased and decreased methylation of 268 and 189 CpG sites, respectively, were significantly correlated with the development of CKD in multivariable logistic regression. During kidney function slope analysis using follow-up methylation profiles of 49 participants, the percent methylation changes in 913 CpG sites showed a linear relationship with the percent change in eGFR during 8 years. During functional enrichment analyses for significant CpG sites found in the CKD prediction and kidney function slope analyses, we found that those CpG sites represented MAPK, PI3K/Akt, and Rap1 pathways. In addition, three CpG sites from three genes, NPHS2, CHCHD4, and AHR, were found to be significant in the CKD prediction analysis and related to a decline in kidney function. Conclusion: It is suggested that DNA methylation on specific genes is associated with the development of CKD and the deterioration of kidney function.

1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global public health problem. CKD affects 10–15% of the population worldwide and is now recognized as the most rapidly increasing contributor to the global burden of disease [1,2]. CKD can be defined as the sustained presence of a reduced glomerular filtration rate [3]. It is widely recognized that CKD plays a significant role in the development of cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, hospitalization, and mortality [4,5,6]. However, despite the clinical significance of CKD, our understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying CKD and its progression remains incomplete. Traditional biomarkers of CKD, including creatinine and proteinuria, are reliable and easily measured with non-invasive methods. However, their ability to detect kidney injury in early stages and identify populations at high risk of CKD progression is limited [7]. Identifying CKD at earlier stages and recognizing the risk of progression are the key ways to manage and prevent CKD. A lot of studies revealing novel biomarkers for kidney disease have been conducted [8,9].
CKD is a multifactorial disease associated with various genetic and environmental risk factors [10]. Recent large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered hundreds of common variants associated with CKD risk and kidney function [11,12]. While these GWAS provide insights into the genetic background associated with the pathophysiology of CKD, they cannot detect longitudinal changes or the environmental effect. Instead, epigenomic and transcriptomic profiling are required to obtain the complete picture of CKD regarding the environmental effect.
DNA methylation is one of the main epigenetic mechanisms for the regulation of gene expression [13,14]. Most CpG islands are found in promoter regions and closely linked to gene expression. Generally, when CpG islands undergo methylation, they block the access of several transcription factors involved in gene activation, resulting in the suppression of gene expression [15].
Previous studies on methylation in association with CKD have been limited by factors such as small sample sizes, cross-sectional designs, or inclusion of individuals with specific comorbidities [16,17,18,19]. In 2011, a large cohort was analyzed in an epigenetics study of CKD [17]. However, the definition of CKD in this study was based solely on estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 measured at a single time point, which poses challenges in accurately distinguishing it as “chronic” kidney injury. Additionally, no previous methylation studies focused on examining temporal changes in methylation patterns specifically related to renal function.
This study addresses the limitations of previous research by introducing a novel approach to defining renal dysfunction. We consider both the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels at a single time point and the rate of change in renal function during long-term follow-up. Additionally, we analyze the associated changes in methylation patterns. Our goal is to identify methylation sites that substantially correlate with renal function decline, as well as the development of CKD. Consequently, our study aims to identify specific genes that can be targeted for future epigenetic biomarker analysis, thereby providing valuable insights into the field of kidney research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The present study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Korea University Guro Hospital (IRB no. 2020-0191-01). All participants were recruited from the Korean Genome Epidemiology Study (KoGES), a longitudinal community-based prospective study initiated in 2001–2002 with follow-up performed every 2 years until the eighth follow-up at 16 years. DNA methylation profiling was performed in the baseline study and reanalyzed at the fifth follow-up point after 8 years. The KoGES cohort consists of Korean middle-aged general population participants aged between 40 and 69 years. The details of the study protocol concerning the enrollment and follow-up of participants were presented previously [20].

2.2. DNA Methylation Profiling

For DNA methylation profiling, genomic DNA was extracted from the buffy coats of participants isolated within 2 h of blood collection. The sample collection time consisted of two times: at the time of enrollment in the KoGES study (n = 446) and follow-up after 8 years (n = 50). DNA methylation was measured with the Illumina Infinium Human Methylation 450 BeadChip system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), which interrogates >485,000 CpGs covering 99% of RefSeq genes. The DNA methylation assessment procedure has been described previously [21,22]. In brief, genomic DNA (500-ng for each sample) was modified by sodium bisulfite, using an EZ DNA methylation kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Additionally, the extraction of the intensity values of each site, along with background correction, was carried out using the GenomeStudio V2011 (Methylation Module, R 2.11) software after passing quality-control steps. Each methylation datapoint was identified by fluorescent signals, and the β-value was calculated to signify percent methylation, from 0 to 100%, by the ratio of signals from methylated and unmethylated alleles. CpGs with more than 1% missing data across all samples were discarded.

2.3. Analysis Regarding Incidence and Progression of CKD

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants, including age, sex, height, weight, and history of hypertension and diabetes were collected. Laboratory parameters such as serum blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and albumin were also measured at baseline and follow-up visits. The kidney function of participants was evaluated using eGFR, which was calculated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [23]. It takes into account variables such as age, gender, race, and serum creatinine levels to predict eGFR. The CKD-EPI equation, expressed as a single equation, is eGFR = 141 × min(Scr/κ, 1)α × max(Scr/κ, 1)−1.209 × 0.993Age × 1.018 [if female] × 1.159 [if black], where Scr is serum creatinine, κ is 0.7 for women and 0.9 for men, α is −0.329 for women and −0.411 for men, min indicates the minimum of Scr/κ or 1, and max indicates the maximum of Scr/κ or 1. The development of CKD was defined as a decline of eGFR to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at any time point in 8 years.
We performed an assessment of the association between methylation profiles and the decline in kidney function using two separated analyses. First, the logistic regression analysis for the risk of CKD development in 8 years was performed with baseline methylation profiles (“CKD prediction” analysis). The logistic regression model estimates the probability of the dependent variable belonging to a particular category or group based on the values of the independent variables. This model can provide insights into the factors associated with the likelihood of CKD occurrence. Then, the analysis was performed with the linear regression analysis between the percent decline in eGFR and the percent change in β-value in the methylation profile between baseline and follow-up methylation profiles (“kidney function slope” analysis). The relationship between the longitudinal changes in eGFR and methylation status was assessed using linear regression. A flow diagram of the study design is represented in Figure 1. To clarify the progression of kidney dysfunction, we excluded participants with a eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline.

2.4. Statistical Analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway Analysis

In baseline characteristics, categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages and continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) values. To predict the risk of CKD development in 8 years, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. The relationship between changes in eGFR and changes in methylation profiles was also examined by univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses. In the multivariable regression analysis, age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and eGFR were used as adjustment variables. All significant CpGs found in logistic regression (CKD prediction analysis) and linear regression (kidney function slope analysis) were represented with genomic information by annotating with the “IlluminaHumanMethylation450-kanno.ilmn12.hg19” R package, “getAnnotation” function.
We performed KEGG pathway analyses of the differentially methylated genes with clusterProfiler version 4.0.5 and the pathview R package. KEGG is an encyclopedia of genes and genomes [24]. Molecular functions are represented by networks of interactions and reactions mainly in the form of KEGG pathways and modules. The clusterProfiler package provides a function, enrichKEGG, to calculate enrichment values for KEGG pathways based on hypergeometric distribution [25]. In dotplots for KEGG pathways, the gene ratio (i.e., ratio of input genes that are annotated in a term) was indicated for top features in the enrichment test. The “circlize” R package (version 0.4.14) was used for the circos plot representing the genetic mapping of significant CpGs found in analyses.
p < 0.001 and false-discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p (q-value) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant in the univariable and multivariable analyses, respectively [26,27,28,29]. All statistical analyses were performed using the R software program (version 4.0.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

Of the 446 participants with baseline methylation profiles, 6 participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline were excluded. The baseline characteristics of the remaining 440 participants are shown in Table 1. The mean age of participants was 52.1 ± 8.4 years, and 48.9% were female. The baseline creatinine and eGFR values were 0.85 ± 0.17 mg/dL and 91.8 ± 12.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively.

3.2. Baseline Methylation Profiles Associated with CKD Development in 8 Years (CKD Prediction Analysis)

During the 8-year follow-up period, CKD developed in 67 (15.2%) patients. We obtained and assessed methylation profiles, including 403,129 CpGs of 440 participants, to find the genes associated with CKD development. In the univariable logistic regression analysis, 2187 CpGs were associated with the risk of CKD development, and 457 CpGs remained significant in the multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted with age, sex, baseline eGFR, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and serum albumin level. Blue and red dots in the volcano plot in Figure 2 represent decreased and increased odds for CKD development with increasing methylation at each site found in the multivariable analysis. Among the 457 significant CpGs, increased methylation in 268 CpGs was associated with a greater risk of CKD, while increased methylation in the other 189 CpGs correlated with a decreased risk of CKD. Among the significant CpG sites in the CKD prediction analysis, CpGs included in specific genomes are shown in Table S1.

3.3. Relationship between Methylation and eGFR Changes over Time (Kidney Function Slope Analysis)

Among the 440 participants, second follow-up methylation profiles were examined in 49 participants after 8 years. To find the association between changes in eGFR and methylation status, we calculated the percent change in eGFR as well as percent changes in methylation levels from baseline to follow-up. Among the 431,651 CpGs that remained after filtering for quality control, the change in methylation levels in 1181 CpGs was associated with the change in eGFR in the univariable linear regression analysis. In the multivariable linear regression analysis adjusted with age, sex, baseline eGFR, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and serum albumin level, 913 CpGs still continued to have a significant relationship with eGFR changes. Increased and decreased methylation levels in 298 and 615 CpGs from baseline to 8 years of follow-up were associated with a rapid decline in eGFR over time, respectively. Among the significant CpG sites in kidney function slope analysis, CpGs included in specific genomes are shown in Table S2.

3.4. Functional Enrichment Features and Common Significant CpG Sites in CKD Prediction and Kidney Function Slope Analyses

We further performed a functional enrichment profile analysis with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways related to significant CpGs found in the CKD prediction and kidney function slope analyses, respectively (Figure 3). In the top 20 significant KEGG pathways, multiple pathways related to signal transduction, such as MAPK signaling, PI3K/Akt signaling, and Rap1 signaling pathways, were commonly included in both analyses.
We combined the results from CKD prediction and kidney function slope analyses to find common CpG sites for both analyses. Three CpGs (cg13931925, cg16463573, and cg16535332) were consistently significant in both analyses (cg13931925: multivariable logistic q = 0.043 and multivariable linear regression q = 0.019; cg16463573: multivariable logistic q = 0.017 and multivariable linear regression q = 0.04; cg16535332: multivariable logistic q = 0.027 and multivariable linear regression q = 0.026). We found three genes, NPHS2, CHCHD4 and AHR, associated with these CpG sites, which were significantly associated with the decline in kidney function. Greater methylation of CpG sites in NPHS2 at baseline was associated with a higher risk of CKD development during follow-up, and the increased methylation level of CpG sites in NPHS2 for 8 years correlated with a more rapid decline in eGFR. On the other hand, the methylation of CpGs in CHCHD4 and AHR showed an opposite relationship with NPHS2 in CKD development and the degree of eGFR decline (Figure 4). That is, hypermethylation of CHCH4 and AHR was not only associated with a lower risk of developing CKD, but was also associated with slower eGFR decline. In addition, combined results for each significant CpG site were plotted on a Circos genomic map (Figure S1).

4. Discussion

In this study, using two different methods we demonstrated that DNA methylation profiles were significantly associated with CKD. Methylation sites associated with MAPK, PI3K, and Rap1 signaling pathways were commonly found in both analyses. We discovered that the degree of methylation and changes over time of three genes, NPHS2, CHCHD4, and AHR were associated with both the development and progression of CKD.
DNA methylation, in concert with other regulators, is a major epigenetic factor influencing gene activities [30,31]. Methylation of CpG motifs in promotor regions is generally associated with transcription repression. Previous epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have identified compound correlations between DNA methylation levels at individual CpG sites and diseases such as cancer [32,33], type II diabetes [34], and Alzheimer’s disease [31,35].
In the area of kidney disease, EWAS have also been conducted, but their sample sizes and longitudinal study design are limited. In a Swedish study of global methylation in 155 CKD patients compared to 36 healthy controls, no association was found between the total DNA methylation ratio and eGFR [36]. In another cross-sectional study comparing 255 CKD and 152 controls using the Infinium® HumanMethylation450 BeadChip system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), 23 differentially methylated CpG sites were identified in blood samples of 255 CKD participants compared to controls [37]. Another study compared baseline methylation status between participants with rapid disease progression and stable kidney function but involved only a small number of participants (20 participants in each group) [16]. Furthermore, the majority of participants in that study already had eGFR values below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline, suggesting that they were predominantly individuals with CKD. Therefore, direct comparison of their results with our study would not be appropriate. To overcome the weakness of previous studies, we adopted a longitudinal design study that could estimate the causal relationship between methylation and kidney function more specifically, as well as evaluated two consecutive methylation statuses in the same participants to ensure consistency and reliability of the results.
In the present study, we demonstrated significant CpG sites of three genes. The first gene, NPHS2, is located on chromosome 1q25-q31 and was initially mapped through linkage analysis in families affected by autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome [38]. This gene is responsible for encoding the 42 kD integral membrane protein known as podocin, which is expressed in both fetal and mature kidneys. Podocin is situated at the foot process of podocytes within the slit diaphragm, a critical site governing the filtration’s size and charge selectivity [39]. Podocin-deficient NPHS2 knockout mice present with massive proteinuria at birth [40]. In humans, it was reported that autosomal-recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome is associated with NPHS2 mutations, and podocin mutations result in changes in the distribution of nephrin and other proteins in podocytes [38,41]. In this study, we showed that NPHS2 is associated with podocin dysfunction not only by mutation but also by abnormal hypermethylation.
AHR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) is another gene that has been implicated in kidney disease, although its role is not as extensively studied yet. AHR is a ligand-activated transcription factor that plays a crucial role in xenobiotic metabolism and the regulation of various biological processes, including immune responses and cellular differentiation [42]. Studies have shown that AHR activation is involved in the pathogenesis of several renal diseases, including renal fibrosis and glomerular injury.
Studies using animal models have demonstrated the involvement of AHR in kidney injury and disease progression. For example, in a mouse model of unilateral ureteral obstruction, AHR activation was shown to exacerbate renal inflammation and fibrosis, whereas AHR deficiency attenuated these pathological changes [43]. Furthermore, in a murine model of diabetic nephropathy, AHR activation contributed to macrophage infiltration, extracellular matrix accumulation and mesangial cell activation [44]. In human studies, AHR has been associated with kidney-related outcomes. In a cohort of patients with diabetic nephropathy, higher AHR expression levels were found to be associated with more severe renal pathology and worse renal function [45]. These findings suggest that AHR may play a role in the pathogenesis of kidney disease by contributing to inflammation, oxidative stress, and fibrosis.
Contrary to NPHS2 and AHR, which is a well-known gene involved in kidney function, the role of CHCHD4 in kidney disease has not been studied as much. CHCHD4, a redox-sensitive mitochondrial protein, has been shown to regulate aspects of the basal cellular oxygen consumption rate, including hypoxia signaling and HIF-1α stability [46,47,48]. Stabilization of HIF-1α, a key regulator of tissue response to hypoxia in the kidneys, has been shown to ameliorate tubulointerstitial injury [49]. It was suggested to assume that methylation of CHCHD4 might be related to a reduction in kidney function through regulating HIF-1a after hypoxic injury [50].
In pathway analyses, we found common associations with PI3K/Akt, MAPK, and Rap1 pathways in both analyses. Evidence for the role of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in renal damage has been offered by recent studies. One study reported that down-regulation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway reduces profibrotic interstitial cells and the potential number of tubular cells, which is associated with excessive interstitial matrix production [51]. Another study revealed that pharmacologic inhibition of PI3K reduced proliferation in fibroblasts in rat unilateral ureteral obstruction models [52]. In addition, alteration of MAPK signaling with activation by Ras or Rap1 has been reported in various kidney diseases [53,54,55]. In a unilateral ureteral obstruction model, NF-kB and MAPK signal pathways are activated to switch on the inflammatory response to aggravate kidney fibrosis [55]. One study demonstrated in vivo and in vitro ischemic–reperfusion injury induced an increase in phospho-MAPK, and fibrosis markers were decreased following the addition of MAPK inhibitor [54]. Consistent with these previous studies, the present study suggested that epigenetic changes in genes related to these pathways may be associated with renal dysfunction in the general population.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the association between specific-site DNA methylation and CKD with serially obtained methylation datasets. Previous studies on DNA methylation have made efforts to identify biomarkers for chronic kidney disease. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the association between methylation changes in both the initial assessment and follow-up examinations and changes in renal function, as our study did. In our research, we first identified methylation sites associated with the occurrence of CKD in a general population. Among these sites, we selected those that exhibited concurrent changes in methylation levels along with changes in renal function over time. Essentially, by employing two distinct approaches—CKD occurrence and progression—we were able to pinpoint common methylated sites. This enabled us to uncover more reliable indicators of the association between methylation and renal function.
Although our study provided novel evidence of potential epigenomic biomarkers for CKD, it is important to acknowledge several limitations. In our study, we utilized a less conservative approach in the initial screening stage, known as univariable analysis, by setting a threshold of p < 0.001, which is higher than the typical significance level in epigenetic studies. This decision was made to validate genes that were consistently identified across two different designs and were concomitant. However, this less conservative approach may raise concerns regarding the statistical robustness of the findings. Furthermore, it is important to note that the DNA methylation analysis conducted in our study was performed on whole blood samples rather than kidney tissue. However, emerging research suggests that differentially methylated regions relevant to specific traits in blood may exhibit similar associations in the target tissues, as supported by recent publications [56,57]. A previous study has reported associations between DNA methylation of certain CpG sites related to eGFR in blood cells and renal fibrosis when DNA methylation was measured in renal tissue [58]. This suggests a potential translation of DNA methylation patterns observed in blood to kidney tissue. This assumption finds support in the physiological role of the kidneys, which involves the filtration of waste products from the blood, as well as the involvement of immune cell-related pathophysiology in certain kidney diseases. Another limitation of our study is the potential for unadjusted variables in the multivariable adjustment analysis, which could introduce residual confounding and impact the observed associations. In addition, DNA methylation was quantified in whole blood, which represents a mixture of various cell types. It is important to acknowledge that DNA methylation patterns can vary across different cell types [59], and studying methylation in whole blood may not capture cell type-specific differences. Further investigations are warranted to address these limitations and explore the cell type-specific DNA methylation patterns associated with kidney disease in future studies. Since this study was conducted only in Korea, its application in other ethnic groups may not be suitable. Further investigations using a larger number of CpG sites and various ethnicities in larger populations are needed to allow specific epigenetic biomarkers to be established.

5. Conclusions

Epigenomic and transcriptomic profiling, coupled with protein and metabolite analysis, may give a more complete picture of CKD. Genomic and epigenomic biomarkers may not only provide information on the etiology and mechanisms underlying CKD progression but may also be used for early diagnosis and appropriate treatment selection, enabling therapy to be personalized. Through this effort to move daily practice toward a precision-medicine approach, early identification of high-risk populations for CKD could ultimately guide the clinician towards a better assessment of manageable kidney risk factors and to improve patient outcomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14071489/s1, Figure S1: Genomic information mapping of CpG sites for 457 in logistic regression results and 913 in linear regression results was presented as circos plot; Table S1: Significant CpGs in CKD prediction analysis; Table S2: Significant CpGs in kidney function slope analysis.

Author Contributions

J.-E.K. and M.-J.J. are joint first authors, with both contributing equally to study design and man-uscript writing; E.C., S.-Y.A. and Y.-J.K. contributed to data collection; J.-E.K., J.-A.G. and G.-J.K. involved in data analysis; J.-A.G. and G.-J.K. involved in study supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF-2020M3E5D7085175) funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Ministry of Science and ICT, Ministry of Trade Industry and Energy, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (The National Project of Bio Big Data) and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1A6A3A01087658).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of Korea University Guro Hospital (IRB no. 2020-0191-01).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board of Korea University Guro Hospital due to de-identified public data usage.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Levin, A.; Tonelli, M.; Bonventre, J.; Coresh, J.; Donner, J.A.; Fogo, A.B.; Fox, C.S.; Gansevoort, R.T.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Jardine, M.; et al. Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: A roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy. Lancet 2017, 390, 1888–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jha, V.; Garcia-Garcia, G.; Iseki, K.; Li, Z.; Naicker, S.; Plattner, B.; Saran, R.; Wang, A.Y.; Yang, C.W. Chronic kidney disease: Global dimension and perspectives. Lancet 2013, 382, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stevens, P.E.; Levin, A. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: Synopsis of the kidney disease: Improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013, 158, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. van der Velde, M.; Matsushita, K.; Coresh, J.; Astor, B.C.; Woodward, M.; Levey, A.; de Jong, P.; Gansevoort, R.T.; Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium; van der Velde, M.; et al. Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher albuminuria are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. A collaborative meta-analysis of high-risk population cohorts. Kidney Int. 2011, 79, 1341–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Slee, A.D. Exploring metabolic dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 9, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Nitsch, D.; Lawlor, D.A.; Patel, R.; Carson, C.; Ebrahim, S. The association of renal impairment with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Urbschat, A.; Obermuller, N.; Haferkamp, A. Biomarkers of kidney injury. Biomarkers 2011, 16 (Suppl. S1), S22–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Breit, M.; Weinberger, K.M. Metabolic biomarkers for chronic kidney disease. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 589, 62–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hocher, B.; Adamski, J. Metabolomics for clinical use and research in chronic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017, 13, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Canadas-Garre, M.; Anderson, K.; McGoldrick, J.; Maxwell, A.P.; McKnight, A.J. Genomic approaches in the search for molecular biomarkers in chronic kidney disease. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wuttke, M.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Sieber, K.B.; Feitosa, M.F.; Gorski, M.; Tin, A.; Wang, L.; Chu, A.Y.; Hoppmann, A.; et al. A catalog of genetic loci associated with kidney function from analyses of a million individuals. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 957–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Teumer, A.; Li, Y.; Ghasemi, S.; Prins, B.P.; Wuttke, M.; Hermle, T.; Giri, A.; Sieber, K.B.; Qiu, C.; Kirsten, H.; et al. Genome-wide association meta-analyses and fine-mapping elucidate pathways influencing albuminuria. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Moore, L.D.; Le, T.; Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Anastasiadi, D.; Esteve-Codina, A.; Piferrer, F. Consistent inverse correlation between DNA methylation of the first intron and gene expression across tissues and species. Epigenetics Chromatin 2018, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rakyan, V.K.; Down, T.A.; Balding, D.J.; Beck, S. Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wing, M.R.; Devaney, J.M.; Joffe, M.M.; Xie, D.; Feldman, H.I.; Dominic, E.A.; Guzman, N.J.; Ramezani, A.; Susztak, K.; Herman, J.G.; et al. DNA methylation profile associated with rapid decline in kidney function: Findings from the CRIC study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2014, 29, 864–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sapienza, C.; Lee, J.; Powell, J.; Erinle, O.; Yafai, F.; Reichert, J.; Siraj, E.S.; Madaio, M. DNA methylation profiling identifies epigenetic differences between diabetes patients with ESRD and diabetes patients without nephropathy. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ingrosso, D.; Perna, A.F. DNA Methylation Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease. Genes 2020, 11, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hill, C.; Duffy, S.; Kettyle, L.M.; McGlynn, L.; Sandholm, N.; Salem, R.M.; Thompson, A.; Swan, E.J.; Kilner, J.; Rossing, P.; et al. Differential Methylation of Telomere-Related Genes Is Associated with Kidney Disease in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes. Genes 2023, 14, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, Y.; Han, B.G.; KoGES Group. Cohort Profile: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Consortium. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jeon, J.P.; Koh, I.U.; Choi, N.H.; Kim, B.J.; Han, B.G.; Lee, S. Differential DNA methylation of MSI2 and its correlation with diabetic traits. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Shim, S.M.; Cho, Y.K.; Hong, E.J.; Han, B.G.; Jeon, J.P. An epigenomic signature of postprandial hyperglycemia in peripheral blood leukocytes. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 61, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Levey, A.S.; Stevens, L.A.; Schmid, C.H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Castro, A.F., 3rd; Feldman, H.I.; Kusek, J.W.; Eggers, P.; Van Lente, F.; Greene, T.; et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 150, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D353–D361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yu, G.; Wang, L.G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 2012, 16, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, Z.; Liu, B.; Yi, M.; Qiu, H.; Yuan, X. A Prognostic Nomogram Model Based on mRNA Expression of DNA Methylation-Driven Genes for Gastric Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 584733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, R.; Li, Y.; Yu, H.; Liu, L.; Zhu, C.; Zuo, S.; Chen, Z. An aberrant DNA methylation signature for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, E.; Hou, X.; Hou, B.; Zhang, M.; Song, Y. A risk prediction model of DNA methylation improves prognosis evaluation and indicates gene targets in prostate cancer. Epigenomics 2020, 12, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Guastafierro, T.; Bacalini, M.G.; Marcoccia, A.; Gentilini, D.; Pisoni, S.; Di Blasio, A.M.; Corsi, A.; Franceschi, C.; Raimondo, D.; Spano, A.; et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in blood cells from patients with Werner syndrome. Clin. Epigenetics 2017, 9, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Lowdon, R.F.; Jang, H.S.; Wang, T. Evolution of Epigenetic Regulation in Vertebrate Genomes. Trends Genet. 2016, 32, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lea, A.J.; Vockley, C.M.; Johnston, R.A.; Del Carpio, C.A.; Barreiro, L.B.; Reddy, T.E.; Tung, J. Genome-wide quantification of the effects of DNA methylation on human gene regulation. Elife 2018, 7, e37513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kulis, M.; Esteller, M. DNA methylation and cancer. Adv. Genet. 2010, 70, 27–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aran, D.; Sabato, S.; Hellman, A. DNA methylation of distal regulatory sites characterizes dysregulation of cancer genes. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Dayeh, T.; Volkov, P.; Salo, S.; Hall, E.; Nilsson, E.; Olsson, A.H.; Kirkpatrick, C.L.; Wollheim, C.B.; Eliasson, L.; Ronn, T.; et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of human pancreatic islets from type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic donors identifies candidate genes that influence insulin secretion. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bakulski, K.M.; Dolinoy, D.C.; Sartor, M.A.; Paulson, H.L.; Konen, J.R.; Lieberman, A.P.; Albin, R.L.; Hu, H.; Rozek, L.S. Genome-wide DNA methylation differences between late-onset Alzheimer’s disease and cognitively normal controls in human frontal cortex. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2012, 29, 571–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stenvinkel, P.; Karimi, M.; Johansson, S.; Axelsson, J.; Suliman, M.; Lindholm, B.; Heimburger, O.; Barany, P.; Alvestrand, A.; Nordfors, L.; et al. Impact of inflammation on epigenetic DNA methylation—A novel risk factor for cardiovascular disease? J. Intern. Med. 2007, 261, 488–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smyth, L.J.; McKay, G.J.; Maxwell, A.P.; McKnight, A.J. DNA hypermethylation and DNA hypomethylation is present at different loci in chronic kidney disease. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fuchshuber, A.; Jean, G.; Gribouval, O.; Gubler, M.C.; Broyer, M.; Beckmann, J.S.; Niaudet, P.; Antignac, C. Mapping a gene (SRN1) to chromosome 1q25-q31 in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome confirms a distinct entity of autosomal recessive nephrosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1995, 4, 2155–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Caridi, G.; Perfumo, F.; Ghiggeri, G.M. NPHS2 (Podocin) mutations in nephrotic syndrome. Clinical spectrum and fine mechanisms. Pediatr. Res. 2005, 57, 54R–61R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Roselli, S.; Heidet, L.; Sich, M.; Henger, A.; Kretzler, M.; Gubler, M.C.; Antignac, C. Early glomerular filtration defect and severe renal disease in podocin-deficient mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, S.Y.; Marlier, A.; Gribouval, O.; Gilbert, T.; Heidet, L.; Antignac, C.; Gubler, M.C. In vivo expression of podocyte slit diaphragm-associated proteins in nephrotic patients with NPHS2 mutation. Kidney Int. 2004, 66, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Denison, M.S.; Nagy, S.R. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and endogenous chemicals. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2003, 43, 309–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cao, G.; Miao, H.; Wang, Y.N.; Chen, D.Q.; Wu, X.Q.; Chen, L.; Guo, Y.; Zou, L.; Vaziri, N.D.; Li, P.; et al. Intrarenal 1-methoxypyrene, an aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist, mediates progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis in mice. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2022, 43, 2929–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, W.J.; Liu, S.H.; Chiang, C.K.; Lin, S.Y.; Liang, K.W.; Chen, C.H.; Tien, H.R.; Chen, P.H.; Wu, J.P.; Tsai, Y.C.; et al. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Deficiency Attenuates Oxidative Stress-Related Mesangial Cell Activation and Macrophage Infiltration and Extracellular Matrix Accumulation in Diabetic Nephropathy. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016, 24, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kim, J.T.; Kim, S.S.; Jun, D.W.; Hwang, Y.H.; Park, W.H.; Pak, Y.K.; Lee, H.K. Serum arylhydrocarbon receptor transactivating activity is elevated in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. J. Diabetes Investig. 2013, 4, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sokol, A.M.; Uszczynska-Ratajczak, B.; Collins, M.M.; Bazala, M.; Topf, U.; Lundegaard, P.R.; Sugunan, S.; Guenther, S.; Kuenne, C.; Graumann, J.; et al. Loss of the Mia40a oxidoreductase leads to hepato-pancreatic insufficiency in zebrafish. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yang, J.; Staples, O.; Thomas, L.W.; Briston, T.; Robson, M.; Poon, E.; Simoes, M.L.; El-Emir, E.; Buffa, F.M.; Ahmed, A.; et al. Human CHCHD4 mitochondrial proteins regulate cellular oxygen consumption rate and metabolism and provide a critical role in hypoxia signaling and tumor progression. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thomas, L.W.; Staples, O.; Turmaine, M.; Ashcroft, M. CHCHD4 Regulates Intracellular Oxygenation and Perinuclear Distribution of Mitochondria. Front. Oncol. 2017, 7, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zou, J.; Yang, J.; Zhu, X.; Zhong, J.; Elshaer, A.; Matsusaka, T.; Pastan, I.; Haase, V.H.; Yang, H.C.; Fogo, A.B. Stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor ameliorates glomerular injury sensitization after tubulointerstitial injury. Kidney Int. 2021, 99, 620–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Al-Habib, H.; Ashcroft, M. CHCHD4 (MIA40) and the mitochondrial disulfide relay system. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2021, 49, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in renal fibrogenesis: Pathologic significance, molecular mechanism, and therapeutic intervention. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Winbanks, C.E.; Grimwood, L.; Gasser, A.; Darby, I.A.; Hewitson, T.D.; Becker, G.J. Role of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mTOR pathways in the regulation of renal fibroblast function and differentiation. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cheng, X.; Gao, W.; Dang, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Peng, X.; Ye, X. Both ERK/MAPK and TGF-Beta/Smad signaling pathways play a role in the kidney fibrosis of diabetic mice accelerated by blood glucose fluctuation. J. Diabetes Res. 2013, 2013, 463740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. An, J.N.; Yang, S.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Hwang, J.H.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, D.K.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, D.W.; Hur, D.G.; Oh, Y.K.; et al. Periostin induces kidney fibrosis after acute kidney injury via the p38 MAPK pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2019, 316, F426–F437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, W.; Zhou, P.H.; Xu, C.G.; Zhou, X.J.; Hu, W.; Zhang, J. Baicalein attenuates renal fibrosis by inhibiting inflammation via down-regulating NF-kappaB and MAPK signal pathways. J. Mol. Histol. 2015, 46, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wahl, S.; Drong, A.; Lehne, B.; Loh, M.; Scott, W.R.; Kunze, S.; Tsai, P.C.; Ried, J.S.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Y.; et al. Epigenome-wide association study of body mass index, and the adverse outcomes of adiposity. Nature 2017, 541, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Shi, J.; Marconett, C.N.; Duan, J.; Hyland, P.L.; Li, P.; Wang, Z.; Wheeler, W.; Zhou, B.; Campan, M.; Lee, D.S.; et al. Characterizing the genetic basis of methylome diversity in histologically normal human lung tissue. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Schlosser, P.; Tin, A.; Matias-Garcia, P.R.; Thio, C.H.L.; Joehanes, R.; Liu, H.; Weihs, A.; Yu, Z.; Hoppmann, A.; Grundner-Culemann, F.; et al. Meta-analyses identify DNA methylation associated with kidney function and damage. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Loyfer, N.; Magenheim, J.; Peretz, A.; Cann, G.; Bredno, J.; Klochendler, A.; Fox-Fisher, I.; Shabi-Porat, S.; Hecht, M.; Pelet, T.; et al. A DNA methylation atlas of normal human cell types. Nature 2023, 613, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 14 01489 g001 550
Figure 1. Study design. This study consisted of 2 analysis models; “CKD prediction” was the logistic regression analysis for CKD development in 8 years and “kidney function slope” was the linear regression analysis between changes in methylation scores and changes in eGFR for 8 years. Both analyses were performed with multivariable adjustment, including age, sex, baseline eGFR, hypertension, diabetes, and serum albumin level. The final aim of this study was to find the common CpGs and related genes in both analyses. 10Y, 10 years; f/u, follow-up.
Figure 1. Study design. This study consisted of 2 analysis models; “CKD prediction” was the logistic regression analysis for CKD development in 8 years and “kidney function slope” was the linear regression analysis between changes in methylation scores and changes in eGFR for 8 years. Both analyses were performed with multivariable adjustment, including age, sex, baseline eGFR, hypertension, diabetes, and serum albumin level. The final aim of this study was to find the common CpGs and related genes in both analyses. 10Y, 10 years; f/u, follow-up.
Genes 14 01489 g001
Genes 14 01489 g002 550
Figure 2. Volcano plots for the odds of CKD development found in the CKD prediction analysis. The X-axis and Y-axis represent natural log-transformed odds ratios and log-transformed p values, respectively. Black dots represent the results from unadjusted logistic regression and the dots plotted above than horizontal dashed line represent statistically significant values (p < 0.001). Blue and red dots represent significant CpGs in the multivariable-adjusted analysis, and they indicate decreased and increased odds for CKD development according to elevated methylation at each site, respectively.
Figure 2. Volcano plots for the odds of CKD development found in the CKD prediction analysis. The X-axis and Y-axis represent natural log-transformed odds ratios and log-transformed p values, respectively. Black dots represent the results from unadjusted logistic regression and the dots plotted above than horizontal dashed line represent statistically significant values (p < 0.001). Blue and red dots represent significant CpGs in the multivariable-adjusted analysis, and they indicate decreased and increased odds for CKD development according to elevated methylation at each site, respectively.
Genes 14 01489 g002
Genes 14 01489 g003 550
Figure 3. KEGG cluster profiles in CKD prediction and kidney function slope analyses. From the top, the top 20 KEGG pathways correlated with CKD prediction (left) and kidney function slope (right) results were listed. Dot size represents the gene count related to specific pathways and dot color represents adjusted p values. X-axis indicates the gene ratio, which was calculated by the count of the selected genes in this analysis/count of pathway genes.
Figure 3. KEGG cluster profiles in CKD prediction and kidney function slope analyses. From the top, the top 20 KEGG pathways correlated with CKD prediction (left) and kidney function slope (right) results were listed. Dot size represents the gene count related to specific pathways and dot color represents adjusted p values. X-axis indicates the gene ratio, which was calculated by the count of the selected genes in this analysis/count of pathway genes.
Genes 14 01489 g003
Genes 14 01489 g004 550
Figure 4. Scatter plots and linear regression lines illustrate the methylation changes at three CpG sites of three genes (NPHS2, CHCHD4, and ARH from left to right) associated with the progression of renal dysfunction and the development of CKD. The solid black lines represent the fitted linear regression lines, and the gray areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals. The x-axis represents the percentage change in methylation from baseline to follow-up measurements: (follow-up methylation—baseline methylation)/baseline methylation × 100. The y-axis represents the percentage decline in eGFR from baseline to follow-up measurements: (baseline eGFR—follow-up measurement eGFR)/baseline eGFR × 100.
Figure 4. Scatter plots and linear regression lines illustrate the methylation changes at three CpG sites of three genes (NPHS2, CHCHD4, and ARH from left to right) associated with the progression of renal dysfunction and the development of CKD. The solid black lines represent the fitted linear regression lines, and the gray areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals. The x-axis represents the percentage change in methylation from baseline to follow-up measurements: (follow-up methylation—baseline methylation)/baseline methylation × 100. The y-axis represents the percentage decline in eGFR from baseline to follow-up measurements: (baseline eGFR—follow-up measurement eGFR)/baseline eGFR × 100.
Genes 14 01489 g004
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants (n = 440).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants (n = 440).
Baseline VariablesValues
Age, years [M ± SE]52.1 ± 8.4
Female sex, [abs (%)]215 (48.9)
Body mass index, kg/m2 [M ± SE]24.6 ± 3.4
Smoking tobacco, [abs (%)]
    Current121 (27.5)
    Ex65 (14.8)
    Never245 (55.7)
    No response9 (2.1)
Alcohol consumption, [abs (%)]
    Current218 (49.6)
    Ex30 (6.8)
    Never186 (42.3)
    No response6 (1.4)
Hypertension, [abs (%)]63 (14.3)
Diabetes mellitus, [abs (%)]43 (9.8)
Dyslipidemia, [abs (%)]7 (1.6)
Myocardial infarction, [abs (%)]1 (0.2)
Congestive heart failure, [abs (%)]1 (0.2)
Cerebrovascular disease, [abs (%)]4 (0.9)
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg [M ± SE]121.9 ± 17.8
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg [M ± SE]81.2 ± 11.2
eGFR CKD-EPI, mL/min/1.73 m2 [M ± SE]91.8 ± 12.8
Serum blood urea nitrogen, mg/dL [M ± SE]14.4 ± 3.4
Serum creatinine, mg/dL [M ± SE]0.85 ± 0.17
Serum total cholesterol, mg/dL [M ± SE]193.3 ± 35.0
Blood hemoglobin, g/dL [M ± SE]13.7 ± 1.6
Serum albumin, g/dL [M ± SE]4.3 ± 0.4
Abbreviation: eGFR CKD-EPI, estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.-E.; Jo, M.-J.; Cho, E.; Ahn, S.-Y.; Kwon, Y.-J.; Gim, J.-A.; Ko, G.-J. The Effect of DNA Methylation in the Development and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in the General Population: An Epigenome-Wide Association Study Using the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Database. Genes 2023, 14, 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071489

AMA Style

Kim J-E, Jo M-J, Cho E, Ahn S-Y, Kwon Y-J, Gim J-A, Ko G-J. The Effect of DNA Methylation in the Development and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in the General Population: An Epigenome-Wide Association Study Using the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Database. Genes. 2023; 14(7):1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071489

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Ji-Eun, Min-Jee Jo, Eunjung Cho, Shin-Young Ahn, Young-Joo Kwon, Jeong-An Gim, and Gang-Jee Ko. 2023. "The Effect of DNA Methylation in the Development and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in the General Population: An Epigenome-Wide Association Study Using the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Database" Genes 14, no. 7: 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071489

APA Style

Kim, J. -E., Jo, M. -J., Cho, E., Ahn, S. -Y., Kwon, Y. -J., Gim, J. -A., & Ko, G. -J. (2023). The Effect of DNA Methylation in the Development and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in the General Population: An Epigenome-Wide Association Study Using the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Database. Genes, 14(7), 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071489

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop