Next Article in Journal
Variation in Water Deficit and Its Association with Climate Indices in Weihe River Basin, China
Next Article in Special Issue
A Statistical Forecasting Model for Extremes of the Fire Behaviour Index in Australia
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Dust Storm and Wildfire Events on Phytoplankton Growth and Carbon Sequestration in the Tasman Sea, Southeast Australia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Effects of Urban Canopy on Extreme Rainfall over the Lake Victoria Basin in East Africa Using the WRF Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Annual and Seasonal Characteristics of Rainfall Erosivity in the Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria)

1
Faculty of Geology and Exploration, University of Mining and Geology “St. Ivan Rilski”, Sofia 1700, Bulgaria
2
Faculty of Geology and Geography, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2024, 15(3), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030338
Submission received: 18 January 2024 / Revised: 2 March 2024 / Accepted: 6 March 2024 / Published: 9 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Weather and Climate Extremes: Observations, Modeling, and Impacts)

Abstract

:
Rainfall, with its intensity, duration, and seasonal distribution, is among the main factors causing soil erosion, which is a widespread environmental problem in Bulgaria. Rainfall erosivity shows the potential of precipitation to generate erosion processes and is an essential indicator of the climate vulnerability of a region. This paper aims to evaluate rainfall erosivity in a part of the Eastern Rhodopes Mountains, an area that is characterised by high-intensity erosion processes and high erosion risk. Local peculiarities of rainfall erosivity were revealed by the calculation of some precipitation indices based on the monthly precipitation for the period 2000–2021, such as the precipitation concentration index (PCI), Angot precipitation index, Fournier index (FI), and modified Fournier index (MFI). The analysis of the extremely wet and extremely dry months at the annual and seasonal (October–March and April–September) levels was performed to evaluate the susceptibility to erosion. The results from the study show that rainfall erosivity in the studied area varies from low to moderate in the northern part of the study area and from high to very high in the south. According to the MFI, high and very high erosivities have been observed mainly since 2012. The erosivity increases from north to south, to the area with a complex relief, where the combination of orography and atmospheric circulation make favourable conditions for the occurrence of extreme precipitation. The analyses of the calculated indices show that the precipitations in most of the studied area generally have from a low to a moderate erosivity, but this does not exclude the occurrence of cases with high and very high erosivities, which are characteristic of recent years and are related to the increase in annual precipitations and extreme precipitation months. The results of this study can contribute to the development and implementation of measures and preventive activities for the reduction and possible elimination of the negative impacts of extreme precipitation.

1. Introduction

Despite the general trend towards a decrease in soil erosion in Europe [1], soil erosion by water is still one of the most widespread causes of soil degradation in many countries, including Bulgaria [2,3,4,5,6]. The mean soil loss in the European Union is about 2.46 t/ha annually, but 12.7% of European arable lands have a soil loss of more than 5 t/ha annually. The average soil loss rate in Bulgaria is 2.21% of the total soil loss in the EU [7]. In 2016, agricultural areas and natural pastures affected by moderate to severe soil erosion represented more than 80% of the affected areas in EU-27 countries [1]. The research work of Panagos et al. [8] shows that the mean rainfall erosivity for the European Union and Switzerland in 2050 is expected to increase by 18% in comparison to the one in 2010, and for Bulgaria, the change will be 20.6%. Future projections show that by 2070, at the global level, soil erosion will increase by 30–66% in comparison to 2020, and the main driver for this is the increase in the rainfall erosivity because of climate change [9]. Agriculture is the sector that is the most negatively affected by soil erosion. On the other hand, land use and tillage practices can significantly contribute to exacerbating soil erosion.
The development of soil erosion is determined by the soil type, topography, climate, land use, and land management. The type of soil and the quantity of unconsolidated deposits influence the duration of the process and its evolution (e.g., the transition from areal to linear) erosion. Among the features of the relief with the greatest influence are the slopes, aspect, exposure, and the location of the flat surfaces. Regarding climatic factors, precipitation (intensity, seasonal distribution, and extreme precipitation) has the greatest importance for soil erosion by water [5,10]. The impact of raindrops breaks the bonds holding soil particles together, allowing the particles to be entrained in flowing water from surface runoff. For the occurrence of soil erosion by water, intense rainfall has the greatest influence, as well as the alternation of dry and rainy periods. On the other hand, research shows that rainfall events of low intensity, long duration, and fewer return periods can significantly contribute to the overall soil erosion [11].
The results from scientific works prove that an increase in the frequency of the occurrence of extreme climate and weather events (heat waves, drought, and heavy rainfalls) was due to the increase in the global air temperature [12,13]. Erosion can be considered as one of the important indicators of the effects of climate change, as it depends on changes in the distribution and regime of precipitation. Analysing rainfall erosivity in a given area provides information on the potential of rainfall to generate erosion processes and contributes to clarifying the vulnerability to climate change in each region [10,14].
The severity of the problems related to the impact of precipitation on soil erosion has caused the strengthening of scientific research in this area in many regions and countries in the world, including Serbia [10,15], the Republic of North Macedonia [16], Romania [17,18], Greece [19,20], Turkey [21], Spain [22], Portugal [23], the Netherlands [24], South America [14,25,26], and China [27,28]. In existing publications, authors analyse the potential of precipitation to generate erosion processes by calculating several indices, among which, the most used are the Fournier index (FI) and the modified Fournier index (MFI). Previous publications on soil erosion in Bulgaria clarify the problem the most often from the point of view of agroecological measures and indicate in which parts of the country erosion is the most active, which types of soil are the most endangered, where the greatest losses of humus horizons are located, and what measures are recommended for strengthening the grounds [3,29,30,31]. The emphasis of most of the previous publications on erosion in Bulgaria is mainly on the influences of land use/land cover (LULC) changes and anthropogenic activities on the development of erosion processes [6,31]. Despite the role of precipitation in soil erosion processes, the influences of precipitation characteristics on the development of soil erosion at regional and local scales have not yet been sufficiently studied in Bulgaria. This motivated the authors of the present paper to investigate the potential of rainfall to generate erosion processes, for which knowledge is of particular importance in the context of vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. The applied nature of the study is determined by the fact that it analyses local features in the precipitation regime and their erosivities.
The present study aims to enhance the knowledge about the impact of precipitation on soil erosion in the Eastern Rhodopes, Bulgaria—a territory with a high intensity of erosion processes and a high erosion risk according to data from the Ministry of the Environment and Water [32]. Because it is not always possible to have daily precipitation data, especially in the mountainous regions of Bulgaria, a specific goal for the authors of the present study was to demonstrate the use of monthly rainfall data in the analyses of the propagation of erosion processes. To achieve this aim, the following tasks were performed: (1) the precipitation concentrations at annual and seasonal levels were analysed, (2) the rainfall erosivity was evaluated, and (3) the occurrences of extreme precipitation months were determined, and their relationship with the rainfall erosivity was analysed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The area of interest is the Eastern Rhodopes Mountains, located in the southern part of Bulgaria (Figure 1). The relief is from low mountainous to hilly with a high horizontal dissection. The territory is included in the Continental–Mediterranean climate zone, where precipitation is mainly concentrated in the cold season and is characterised by high monthly precipitation totals and great intensity. The summer is hot (The mean monthly temperatures for July are between 23 and 25 °C.), with frequent and severe droughts continuing into early autumn [33,34]. In the northern part of the study area, the annual precipitation is about 700 mm, and it reaches 1200 mm in the southern part. Winter (December–February) precipitation totals represent about 28–32% of the annual precipitation, while summer (June–August) precipitation totals are 17–22% of the annual values. The maximum winter precipitation is determined mainly by Mediterranean cyclones passing near the country. Regional differences are exacerbated by the complex topography and the influence of the slope exposure on precipitating cloudiness along frontal systems. In the cold half-year, precipitation often falls from the warm fronts of cyclones. Thunderstorms develop, with heavy precipitation and sometimes hail, even in winter [35]. Some of the highest maximum daily precipitations in Bulgaria have been measured in this area. In Zlatograd, a rainfall of 234 mm/24 h was recorded in October 1970 and 261 mm/24 h in February 1963 [33].
During the summer season, precipitation is of low frequency and, in most cases, is associated with the cold fronts of Atlantic cyclones or the fronts of Azores anticyclones carrying cool oceanic air over the Balkans [35]. Under such conditions, owing to the orography, it is possible for more powerful thunderstorms to develop, with intense precipitation. Intense sunlight and high temperatures in summertime dry out Earth’s surface, and the soil or rocks easily break down into small particles, which, in a summer storm or in the normal increase in the autumn precipitation, are carried away by the water, and even debris flows can be observed. A high and long-lasting snow cover has not formed in the region of the Eastern Rhodopes. Owing to the relatively high winter temperatures, only 5–8% of the annual precipitation is in the form of snow [34]. Days with snow cover are no more than 15–25 on average per year. Often, the snow cover melts quickly under the influence of the southern warming winds, accompanied by intense rainfall. Rapid snowmelt and sparse vegetation are prerequisites for intensive areal erosion.
In the present study, data on monthly and annual precipitation from 7 meteorological stations for the period 2000–2021 were used. These stations are included in the national monitoring system of the National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology (NIMH), Figure 1. The precipitation data were provided to us for scientific purposes by NIMH.

2.2. Data and Methods

Local analyses of erosion account for the rainfall variability in space and time and can be achieved using a dense network of measurements and spatial information, which are, in many cases, difficult to achieve. On the other hand, scientific research proves that analyses of rainfall erosivity through indices based on monthly and annual sums of precipitation (precipitation concentration index—PCI, Fournier index—FI, and modified Fournier index—MFI) give reliable results that reflect climatic features of specific areas and correspond very well to the erosivity R-factor for rainfall erosivity assessment by the USLE model [36,37,38].
In the present paper, the impact of rainfall on soil erosion by water was determined by the calculation and analyses of precipitation indices, which give information about the precipitation distribution and evaluate the rainfall’s potential for triggering soil erosion. These indices are the FI, MFI, Angot index, and PCI. Soil erosion by water depends on not only the intensity and duration of the rainfall but also the occurrence and duration of extremely dry and extremely wet periods. Because of this, we analysed the multiannual changes in the occurrence of extremely dry and wet months in the investigated area.
Precipitation is a highly variable element of the climate that depends on many factors and varies significantly over the years, which greatly complicates its prediction [39]. Therefore, when studying soil erosion by water, the distributions of precipitation by month and season should be analysed. An indicator of the intra-annual and seasonal distributions of precipitation is the precipitation concentration index—PCI [40,41,42]. In the present study, the annual (PCIann) and seasonal (PCIseasonal) precipitation concentration indices were respectively calculated as follows:
P C I a n n = i = 1 12 p i 2 i = 1 12 p i 2 × 100
and
P C I s e a s o n a l = i = 1 6 p i 2 i = 1 6 p i 2 × 50 ,
where p i is the monthly precipitation.
The seasonal PCIs were calculated for the cold half of the year (October–March) and for the warm half (April–September), which correspond to the wet and dry periods, respectively, in the investigated area. Depending on the PCI values, the categories for the distribution of the precipitation are determined [24], as shown in Table 1. Greater unevenness of precipitation is a prerequisite for stronger erosivity.
To analyse the precipitation’s impact on triggering soil erosion, the Angot precipitation index was calculated, and the susceptibility classes of the precipitation for each month in the years of the investigated period were determined according to [18,43]. The advantages for using the Angot index are that it is based on monthly and annual rainfall values, and the resulting values are easily grouped into established rainfall erosivity classes. For the calculation of the Angot index (K), the following formula was used [17]:
K = p P ,
where p = q n , q is the monthly precipitation, n is the number of days per month, and
P = Q 365 , where Q is the total annual precipitation.
According to the Angot index, precipitation is classified into five classes, depending on the possibility for triggering soil erosion (Table 2).
The average rainfall erosivity was analysed based on the FI and MFI, which were calculated using the following formulas:
F I = p m a x 2 P ,
where p m a x 2 is the monthly precipitation of the rainiest month (mm), and P is the annual sum of the precipitation.
The FI shows the impact of the extreme precipitation on the soil’s erosion. With higher values of the FI, precipitation is concentrated in a relatively short period of the year. This means that during the rest of the year, the rainfall is of a limited amount, which indirectly affects the strengthening of erosion processes through unfavourable conditions for the development of vegetation. The Fournier index emphasises the uneven distribution of the precipitation, but by considering only the wettest month, the precipitation, which is important for erosion, that occurs in other months of the year may be missed. Given this, the modified Fournier index [44] was used to assess the erosivity of the rainfall in the present study and is calculated using the following formula:
M F I = 1 12 p i 2 P ,
where p i is the monthly precipitation, and P is the annual precipitation.
The utilisation of the MFI has been recommended by several authors as a reliable index for the assessment of the potential of the precipitation to generate erosion. The authors in [38,45] found a significant correlation between the MFI and the rainfall erosivity factor (R) in the universal soil loss equation (USLE).
The FI and MFI were calculated for each year, and their averages were calculated for the period 2001–2021. Six classes of rainfall erosivity can be determined based on the values of the FI, and five classes can be determined according to the MFI (Table 3).
The trend in the rainfall erosivity during the period 2001–2021 was analysed based on the linear regressions of the FI and MFI, and the significance of the regression coefficients was determined by t-tests and a level of 0.05.
The occurrences of extremely dry and extremely wet months are determined according to the 10th and 90th percentiles of the distribution of the precipitation data for each month. The months with a total precipitation of equal to or less than that in the 10th percentile are considered as extremely dry months, while the extremely wet months are the months with monthly values of equal to or above that in the 90th percentile. Extreme precipitation months were analysed at annual and seasonal levels for the cold (October–March) and warm (April–September) half-years.
The impacts of extremely dry and extremely wet months on the rainfall erosivity were studied based on the correlations between the MFI and the numbers of extremely dry and wet months, respectively—the Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated, and the T-statistics were used to determine the statistical significance of the correlations at a level of 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Annual Cycle of Precipitation and Precipitation Concentration Index (PCI)

For the period 2000–2021, the average annual precipitation at the investigated stations was between 706 mm (at the station in Kardzhali) and 1213 mm (at the station in Kirkovo), as shown in Table 4. The annual precipitation totals increase from north to south. The increase in the altitude of the studied territory from north to south is not the main reason for the increase in precipitation amounts. The increase in the precipitation is mainly related to the exposure of the slope and the location relative to the mountain ridges on the one hand and the trajectories of Mediterranean cyclones on the other [35].
The average monthly maximum is observed in the cold part of the year (December or January) and has values of 76 and 86 mm in the north part of the study area (at stations in Haskovo and Kardzhali, respectively), 159 mm in January at the station in Tokachka, and 198 mm in December at the station in Kirkovo (in the south part of the region). The average monthly minimum varies between 23 and 36 mm and was observed in August (Figure 2). The uneven monthly distribution of the rainfall has a negative impact and is a prerequisite for erosion.
The disintegration of soil particles is facilitated during a dry period, and the manifestation of intense precipitation after a relatively long dry period is a prerequisite for more intense erosion.
The PCI was calculated at the annual and seasonal levels (for the cold and warm halves of the year). At most of the studied stations, monthly precipitation amounts were moderately distributed during the year—for between 80 and 95% of the years, at separate stations, PCIann showed moderate precipitation concentrations. Different results were obtained for stations in Kirkovo and Tokachka (in the southernmost part of the investigated territory), where PCIann shows irregular distributions, respectively, in 59 and 36% of the years in the period 2000–2021. The years 2016, 2012, and 2020 make an impression, with the highest values of PCIann, which indicate strongly irregular precipitation concentrations at two stations and irregular concentrations at the other stations. The high PCI values in these years are due to a wet spring followed by a very dry summer. In May 2012, the monthly precipitation was over 200 mm at all the studied stations, with the highest monthly precipitation observed at the Kirkovo station—269 mm. The years 2006 and 2009 stand out, with the lowest values of PCIann (between 9 and 12).
The analysis of the distribution of the precipitation in the cold (October–March) and warm (April–September) half-years shows greater variations in PCIseasonal after 2010, as well as in years with irregular precipitation concentrations (15 > PCI ≤ 20) and even strongly irregular concentrations (PCI > 20) during the warm half-year, which leads to a greater probability of erosion in summertime (Figure 3).
Summer is usually a dry period in the studied territory, which does not favour the occurrence of erosion processes by water, but, on the other hand, such processes can be activated in the event of single, intense rainfall, which is not an exception in this area. By infiltrating soil, water compresses the air in and destabilises dry soil aggregates, and the particles are easily carried away by the surface runoff [46].
The strongly irregular precipitation concentration for April–September 2012 (PCI > 20), Figure 3, is due to the high monthly precipitation for May, with values between 177 mm (at the station in Dzhebel) and 269 mm (at the station in Kirkovo). In May 2012, the monthly precipitation was over 50% and, at some stations, 70% of the precipitation amount for the period April–September 2012. The high monthly precipitation totals in May 2012 were related to intense precipitation on 18 May 2012, when a 24-h rainfall of 101.8 mm from rain and hail was recorded at the station in Kirkovo [47]. The cause of the high rainfall on 18 May 2012 was a Mediterranean cyclone centred over the Aegean Sea, which moved north and northeast over Bulgaria. A second-degree hazard (code “orange”) due to intense rainfall was declared in this area.

3.2. Angot Precipitation Index

Most of the studied territory is characterised by winter maxima of precipitation, caused by the influence of Mediterranean cyclones. According to the Angot precipitation index, most of the months in the analysed period have from very low to low erosivities of precipitation, and in summer, this is characteristic of almost all the months. In connection with the precipitation regime and the winter maximum, months with high and very high rainfall erosivities are observed in the period November–February. For the southern part of the studied region, in November–February, about 20–30% of the months in the period 2001–2021 have high or very high erosivities, and in the regions of the Tokachka and Kirkovo stations in December, this indicator is 40 and 50%, respectively (Figure 4).
In winter, especially in recent years, in the studied territory, precipitation is often rain and less often snow, which favours soil erosion by water. Investigating monthly and annual variations in hail events in Bulgaria for the period 1991–2020, Bocheva and Pophristov [35] established a significant increase in hail days in South Bulgaria in the cold half of the year (October–March). The higher precipitation amounts during the cold part of the year and the associated higher erosivity of the precipitation can be explained by the more northerly positions of the frontal zones of passing Mediterranean cyclones. This leads to more intense precipitation in the Eastern Rhodopes, a more frequent occurrence of thunderstorms in the region, and an increase in the number of days with intense precipitation, including hail, especially in the cold part of the year [35].
The increase in convective storms and hail events is among the main factors triggering soil erosion by water. During snowfalls, owing to the higher air temperatures in the southern part of Bulgaria and when warm air blows in from the south, the snow cover is ephemeral and often melts very quickly, which causes floods and can lead to soil erosion.

3.3. Fournier Index and Modified Fournier Index

According to the FI, in most cases, the rainfall erosivity in the investigated area was from low to moderate. In the southeast, the average rainfall erosivity for the period 2000–2021 increases and reaches high and very high classes. The trend in the FI for the period 2000–2021 is positive, but it is not statistically significant. Bearing in mind the fact that the FI is based on the highest monthly rainfall and does not take into account the annual rainfall cycle, the values of the MFI have been calculated and analysed, giving more detailed information on the erosivity of the rainfall.
The MFI shows that the rainfall erosivity in the studied area varied during the individual years in the period 2000–2021 from low to very high. Above 70% of the years in the period 2000–2021, the stations in Dzhebel, Kardzhali, and Haskovo have moderate rainfall erosivities, and in the southern part of the investigated territory (at stations in Kirkovo and Tokachka), most of the years have very high erosivities (Table 5).
The lowest values of the MFI were obtained for the first decade of the investigated period, while the highest values were in the second decade (Table 6). For the period 2000–2011, at 43% of the investigated stations, the average rainfall erosivity is moderate, and only one station indicates a very high erosivity. In the second half of the studied period, 43% of the stations have a very high rainfall erosivity. Despite the trend in the MFI not being statistically significant for all the investigated stations, the results show a positive trend and an increase in the rainfall erosivity (Table 6).
The spatiotemporal distribution of the MFI shows an increase in the rainfall erosivity from the north (at stations in Haskovo and Kardzhali) to the south (at stations in Momchilgrad, Kirkovo, and Tokachka) towards recent years (Figure 5). These characteristics of the rainfall erosivity follow the physical and geographical features of the territory and the manifestation of extremely wet and dry months during the studied period.
The results of the present study show that the MFI gives more detailed information about and is more reliable for rainfall erosivity analyses than the FI. Similar results regarding the applicability of the MFI were found by other authors [10,48].
Rainfall erosivity is more severe in areas with a high annual rainfall or a strong rainfall concentration (high PCI) [49]. The average multiannual precipitation totals for the period 2000–2021 are 1165 mm at the station in Tokachka and 1213 mm at the station in Kirkovo, while at the station in Haskovo, the annual precipitation is 710 mm. The high and very high rainfall erosivities in 2012 are due to high monthly precipitations in the cold months (November–February) and heavy precipitation caused by the combination of Mediterranean cyclones, which are typical for this part of the year, and the orography [50].

3.4. Extremely Wet and Extremely Dry Months

An increase in extreme precipitation months (dry and wet) was observed for all the investigated stations. Similar results were obtained by Nikolova et al. [51] and Svetozarevic and Nikolova [52] for the north and northwest parts of Bulgaria. This is also in line with the conclusions of the IPCC [53] about an increase in extreme events of a different nature at the same places. Comparing the two periods (2000–2010 and 2011–2021), a greater increase in the second period is observed in terms of extremely wet months (Figure 6). During the period 2011–2021, the extremely wet months were 59% of all the extremely wet months for the period 2000–2021.
A statistically significant positive trend in the annual number of extreme precipitations in southeastern Bulgaria was also found by Bocheva et al. [54] for the period 1951–2010. An increase in the number of extremely wet months and their alternation with extremely dry periods are prerequisites for higher erosivities of precipitation—during dry periods, the cohesiveness of soil particles is reduced, and the particles are easily carried away in the event of heavy precipitation.
The analysis of the distribution of the number of extreme precipitation months during the cold and warm parts of the year for two 10-year periods (Figure 7) shows an increase in extreme months during the second decade, and the highest value of the increase was observed for extremely wet months during the cold period (October–March) in 2022–2020. According to the data for heavy precipitation events in Bulgaria for the period 1991–2017, Bocheva and Pophristov [50] point out that the increase in the precipitation amounts is related to the increase in the number of days with heavy precipitation. The authors indicate that especially in winter, this is due to southern cyclones (Mediterranean cyclones). The activity of Mediterranean cyclones over the Balkans was also indicated by Bocheva et al. [54] as the reason for the increase in the frequency of the extreme precipitation in Bulgaria, especially in Eastern Bulgaria. Other authors [55] have associated the increase in heavy precipitation events with increasing air temperatures and longer warm periods, resulting in conditions for convective precipitation. According to [56], for every 1 °C of warming, the water-holding capacity of the air increases by about 7%; because of this, the water vapor in the atmosphere increases, and the occurrence of intense precipitation becomes more frequent. Despite some uncertainties related to regional climate models, e.g., CP_RegCM_3km overestimates extreme precipitation (99p), especially in mountainous areas during summer [57,58], and RegCM_15km underestimates extreme precipitation (99p) [58], the existing publications prove, for the territory of Bulgaria, increases in extreme precipitation in winter and spring and a decrease in summer.
The correlation between the MFI and the number of extremely dry months is weak, negative, and statistically insignificant. The lowest values of the correlation coefficients were obtained for the stations in Kirkovo (−0.23) and Dzhebel (−0.30). On the other hand, the MFI correlates very well with the number of extremely wet months—in most cases, the correlation coefficients are above 0.63, and for the stations in Dzhebel and Haskovo, above 0.80 (Table 7).
The correlation analysis shows strong statistically significant correlations between the MFI and both the number of extremely wet months as well as the annual precipitation. At the seasonal level, these correlations are weak and not statistically significant, except for the number of extremely wet months at some separate stations. It is noteworthy that the stations with the highest frequency of very high rainfall erosivity years according to the MFI (Kirkovo and Tokachka) show the lowest values of the correlation coefficient between the MFI and the number of extreme precipitation months, while the correlation with the annual precipitation is high and statistically significant.

4. Conclusions

The rainfall erosivity in the Eastern Rhodopes, one of the most erosion-prone areas of Bulgaria, was evaluated for the period 2000–2001. The aim of the study was achieved by calculating and analysing some indices, such as the PCI, Angot precipitation index, FI, and MFI. The 10th and 90th percentiles were used as thresholds for the determination of extremely dry and extremely wet months, respectively. This paper emphasises the applicability of monthly precipitation data in studying the average rainfall erosivity, thereby providing important information for areas for which pluviographic records are not available.
According to the PCI, this region has a mainly uniform precipitation distribution over the year, but some years (e.g., 2012, 2016, and 2020) make an impression, with irregular and even strongly irregular precipitation concentrations, which are a consequence of high precipitation amounts observed mainly in April and May in these years. On the other hand, on average, for the period 2000–2021, the Angot index shows a greater share of winter months with severe or very severe erosivity because of the higher monthly precipitation amounts for the winter period.
The analyses based on the FI and MFI show that the MFI gives more detailed information about the changes in the rainfall erosivity over the investigated period. In general, the investigated territory is characterised by a moderate rainfall erosivity, but in the second half of the study period (2000–2021), cases with high and very high erosivities increased, which coincided with the occurrence of extremely dry and extremely wet months. Increases in the numbers of dry and wet months have been found, and the highest increase has been observed in the wet months in the cold half-year. Strong and statistically significant correlations were established between the values of the MFI and the number of wet months during the years of the study period and with the annual precipitation.
The increasing winter precipitation, the number of extreme precipitation months (dry and wet), and the higher rainfall erosivity in recent years show that the development and implementation of measures for sustainable land use and management in agriculture are needed for the investigated territory of the Eastern Rhodopes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, V.N. and N.N.; methodology, N.N.; data processing, V.N., M.S. and S.M.; analysis, V.N., N.N. and S.M.; paper writing, V.N. and N.N.; visualisation, V.N., N.N. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and APC were funded by the National Science Fund, Ministry of Education and Science (Bulgaria); Competition for financial support for basic research projects—2019 (Contract No. KП-06-H34/3, signed on 5.12.2019), projects: “Application of geoinformation technologies in erosion research in mountain areas—Case studies of Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria)”; and National Science Program "Environmental Protection and Reduction of Risks of Adverse Events and Natural Disasters", approved by the Resolution of the Council of Ministers No. 577/17.08.2018 and supported by the Ministry of Education and Science (MES) of Bulgaria (Agreement No. Д01-271/09.12.2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their time and comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Eurostat. Agri-Environmental Indicator—Soil Erosion. 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agri-environmental_indicator_-_soil_erosion (accessed on 15 January 2024).
  2. Borrelli, P.; Alewell, C.; Alvarez, P.; Anache, J.A.A.; Baartman, J.; Ballabio, C.; Bezak, N.; Biddoccu, M.; Cerdà, A.; Chalise, D.; et al. Soil erosion modelling: A global review and statistical analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 780, 14649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rousseva, S. Factors and rates of soil erosion in the Balkan Peninsula. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Ecology Interdisciplinary Science and Practice (Part One), Sofia, Bulgaria, 25–26 October 2012; pp. 43–47. [Google Scholar]
  4. Panagos, P.; Ballabio, C.; Borrelli, P.; Meusburger, K.; Klik, A.; Rousseva, S.; Tadić, M.P.; Michaelides, S.; Hrabalíková, M.; Olsen, P.; et al. Rainfall erosivity in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 511, 801–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ballabio, C.; Borrelli, P.; Spinoni, J.; Meusburger, K.; Michaelides, S.; Beguería, S.; Klik, A.; Petan, S.; Janeček, M.; Olsen, P.; et al. Mapping monthly rainfall erosivity in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1298–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Özşahin, E.; Duru, Ü.; Eroğlu, İ. Land Use and Land Cover Changes (LULCC), a Key to Understand Soil Erosion Intensities in the Maritsa Basin. Water 2018, 10, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Panagos, P.; Borrelli, P.; Poesen, J.; Ballabio, C.; Lugato, E.; Meusburger, K.; Montanarella, L.; Alewell, C. The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 54, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Panagos, P.; Ballabio, C.; Meusburger, K.; Spinoni, J.; Alewell, C.; Borrelli, P. Towards estimates of future rainfall erosivity in Europe based on REDES and WorldClim datasets. J. Hydrol. 2017, 548, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Panagos, P.; Borrelli, P.; Matthews, F.; Liakos, L.; Bezak, N.; Diodato, N.; Ballabio, C. Global rainfall erosivity projections for 2050 and 2070. J. Hydrol. 2022, 610, 127865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lukić, T.; Lukić, A.; Basarin, B.; Ponjiger, T.M.; Blagojević, D.; Mesaroš, M.; Milanović, M.; Gavrilov, M.; Pavić, D.; Zorn, M.; et al. Rainfall erosivity and extreme precipitation in the Pannonian basin. Open Geosci. 2019, 11, 664–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baartman, J.E.M.; Temme, A.J.A.M.; Veldkamp, T.; Jetten, V.G.; Schoorl, J.M. Exploring the role of rainfall variability and extreme events in long-term landscape development. Catena 2013, 109, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zscheischler, J.; Seneviratne, S. Dependence of drivers affects risks associated with compound events. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vogel, M.; Hauser, M.; Seneviratne, S. Projected changes in hot, dry and wet extreme events’ clusters in CMIP6 multi-model ensemble. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 1748–9326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mello, C.R.; Viola, M.R.; Beskow, S.; Norton, L.D. Multivariate models for annual rainfall erosivity in Brazil. Geoderma 2013, 202–203, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lukić, T.; Leščešen, I.; Sakulski, D.; Basarin, B.; Jordaan, A. Rainfall erosivity as an indicator of sliding occurrence along the southern slopes of the Bačka loess plateau: A case study of the Kula settlement, Vojvodina (North Serbia). Carpathian J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2016, 11, 303–318. [Google Scholar]
  16. Alili, I. Rainfall erosivity in the Republic of North Macedonia: Fournier index approach. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 2023, 37, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dragotă, C.S.; Grigorescu, I.; Dumitraşcu, M.; Kucsicsa, G. Pluvial hazards assessment in the Danube floodplain. The Calafat–Turnu MĂagurele sector. Probl. Geogr. 2014, 1–2, 100–114. Available online: https://geoproblems.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2014_12/9_dragota_2014_12.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2024).
  18. Dumitraşcu, M.; Dragotă, C.S.; Grigorescu, I.; Dumitraşcu, C.; Vlădut, A. Key pluvial parameters in assessing rainfall erosivity in the south-west development region, Romania. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 126, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Panagos, P.; Ballabio, C.; Borrelli, P.; Meusburger, K. Spatio-temporal analysis of rainfall erosivity and erosivity density in Greece. Catena 2016, 137, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Efthimiou, N. Evaluating the performance of different empirical rainfall erosivity (R) factor formulas using sediment yield measurements. Catena 2018, 169, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oğuz, I. Rainfall erosivity in North-Central Anatolia in Turkey. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 2719–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hernando, D.; Romana, M.G. Estimating the rainfall erosivity factor from monthly precipitation data in the Madrid Region (Spain). J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 2015, 63, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nunes, A.N.; Lourenço, L.; Vieira, A.; Bento-Gonçalves, A. Precipitation and Erosivity in Southern Portugal: Seasonal Variability and Trends (1950–2008). Land Degrad. Dev. 2016, 27, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lukić, T.; Basarin, B.; Micić, T.; Bjelajac, D.; Maris, T.; Marković, S.B.; Pavić, D.; Gavrilov, M.B.; Mesaroš, M. Rainfall erosivity and extreme precipitation in the Netherlands. Q. J. Hung. Meteorol. Serv. 2018, 122, 409–432. [Google Scholar]
  25. Riquetti, N.V.; Mello, C.R.; Beskow, S.; Viola, M.R. Rainfall erosivity in South America: Current patterns and future perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 724, 138315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Colman, C.B.; Oliveira, P.T.S.; Almagro, A.; Soares-Filho, B.S.; Rodrigues, D.B.B. Effects of Climate and Land-Cover Changes on Soil Erosion in Brazilian Pantanal. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yue, B.J.; Shi, Z.H.; Fang, N.F. Evaluation of rainfall erosivity and its temporal variation in the Yanhe River catchment of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Nat. Hazards 2014, 74, 585–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yue, T.; Yin, S.; Xie, Y.; Yu, B.; Liu, B. Rainfall erosivity mapping over mainland China based on high-density hourly rainfall records. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 665–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rousseva, S.; Malinov, I.; Stefanova, V. Soil Erosion Risk Assessments Using GIS Technologies—Bulgarian Experience. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 22, 205–208. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pavlova-Traykova, E.; Nedkov, S.; Zhiyanski, M. Integral approach to the flood protection effect of forests with special consideration of erosion control in Bulgaria: Review. In Proceedings of the 11th Scientific Seminar, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1 December 2021; pp. 77–87. [Google Scholar]
  31. Özşahin, E.; Eroğlu, I. Soil Erosion Risk Assessment due to Land Use/Land Cover Changes (LULCC) in Bulgaria from 1990 to 2015. Alinteri J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ministry of Environment and Water. National Report on the Environment and the Protection of the Environment; Ministry of Environment and Water: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2020. (In Bulgarian) [Google Scholar]
  33. Topliiski, D. Climate of Bulgaria; Amstels Foundation: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2006; p. 360. (In Bulgarian) [Google Scholar]
  34. Velev, S. Climate of Bulgaria; Heron Press: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2010; p. 189. (In Bulgarian) [Google Scholar]
  35. Bocheva, L.; Pophristov, V. Recent Trends in Hail Precipitation for Administrative Districts of Bulgaria. In Environmental Protection and Disaster Risks. EnviroRISKs 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Dobrinkova, N., Nikolov, O., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Diodato, N.; Bellocchi, G. Estimating monthly (R) USLE climate input in a Mediterranean region using limited data. J. Hydrol. 2007, 345, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Patriche, C.V.; Roșca, B.; Pîrnău, R.G.; Vasiliniuc, I.; Irimia, L.M. Simulation of Rainfall Erosivity Dynamics in Romania under Climate Change Scenarios. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mezősi, G.; Bata, T. Estimation of the changes in the rainfall erosivity in Hungary. J. Environ. Geogr. 2016, 9, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Apaydin, H.; Erpul, G.; Bayramin, I.; Gabriels, D. Evaluation of indices for characterizing the distribution and concentration of precipitation: A case for the region of Southeastern Anatolia Project, Turkey. J. Hydrol. 2006, 328, 726–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. de Luis, M.; Gonzales-Hidalgo, J.C.; Bruneti, M.; Longares, L.A. Precipitation concentration changes in Spain 1946–2005. Nat. Haz. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 11, 1259–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, Y.; Jiang, S.; Ren, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, M.; Liu, R.; Wei, L. Spatial and Temporal Variability in Precipitation Concentration over Mainland China, 1961–2017. Water 2019, 11, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Amiri, M.A.; Gocić, M. Analyzing the applicability of some precipitation concentration indices over Serbia. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2021, 146, 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lukić, T.; Ponjiger, T.M.; Basarin, B.; Sakulski, D.; Gavrilov, M.; Marković, S.; Zorn, M.; Komac, B.; Milanović, M.; Pavić, D.; et al. Application of Angot precipitation index in the assessment of rainfall erosivity: Vojvodina Region case study (North Serbia). Acta Geogr. Slov. 2021, 61–62, 123–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Arnoldus, H.M. An approximation of the rainfall factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. In Assessments of Erosion; De Boodts, M., Gabriels, D., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 1980; pp. 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ma, X.; Zheng, M. Statistical evaluation of proxies for estimating the rainfall erosivity factor. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 12092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mohtar, Z.A.; Yahaya, A.S.; Ahmad, F. Rainfall Erosivity Estimation for Northern and Southern Peninsular Malaysia using Fourneir Indexes. Procedia Eng. 2015, 125, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. May 2012. In Bulgarian. Available online: https://bulletins.cfd.meteo.bg/bull/Buletin_NIMH_201205.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2024).
  48. Nikolova, N.; Matev, S.; Alili, I. Assessment of rainfall erosivity in Southwest Bulgaria using the Fournier index. Rev. Bulg. Geol. Soc. 2022, 83, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. de Luis, M.; González-Hidalgo, J.C.; Longares, L.A. Is rainfall erosivity increasing in the Mediterranean Iberian Peninsula? Land Degrad. Dev. 2010, 21, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bocheva, L.; Pophristov, V. Seasonal Analysis of Large-Scale Heavy Precipitation Events in Bulgaria. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2075, 200017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nikolova, N.; Matev, S.; Pophristov, V. Rainfall Erosivity and Extreme Precipitation Months—A Comparison between the Regions of Lovech and Kardzhali (Bulgaria). In Proceedings of the 21st International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 16–22 August 2021; Volume 21, pp. 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Svetozarevic, J.; Nikolova, N. Seasonal distribution of extreme precipitation months in Northwest Bulgaria. In Proceedings of the Third Conference Climate, Atmosphere and Water Resources in the Face of Climate Change, Sofia, Bulgaria, 14–15 October 2021; pp. 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  53. Core Writing Team; Lee, H.; Romero, J. (Eds.) IPCC: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; 184p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bocheva, L.; Marinova, T.; Nikolova, T. Comparative analysis of severe storms, connected with extreme precipitation in Bulgaria (1951–2010). J. Int. Sci. Publ. Ecol. Saf. 2014, 8, 461–468. Available online: https://www.scientific-publications.net/en/article/1000118/ (accessed on 15 December 2023).
  55. Spiridonov, V.; Balabanova, S. The impact of climate change on intensive precipitation and flood types in Bulgaria. In Climate and Land Use Impacts on Natural and Artificial Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 153–169. ISBN 978-0-12-822184-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kevin, E.T. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 2011, 47, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gadzhev, G.; Ivanov, V.; Valcheva, R.; Ganev, K.; Chervenkov, H. HPC Simulations of the Present and Projected Future Climate of the Balkan Region. In Advances in High Performance Computing. HPC 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence; Dimov, I., Fidanova, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Valcheva, R.; Popov, I.; Gerganov, N. Convection-Permitting Regional Climate Simulation over Bulgaria: Assessment of Precipitation Statistics. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study area with the locations of the meteorological stations.
Figure 1. Study area with the locations of the meteorological stations.
Atmosphere 15 00338 g001
Figure 2. Annual cycle of precipitation for the period 2000–2021.
Figure 2. Annual cycle of precipitation for the period 2000–2021.
Atmosphere 15 00338 g002
Figure 3. Time sequences of PCI for the cold (October–March) and warm (April–September) half-years.
Figure 3. Time sequences of PCI for the cold (October–March) and warm (April–September) half-years.
Atmosphere 15 00338 g003
Figure 4. Percentage of months with different classes of precipitation erosivity according to Angot precipitation index (VL—very low; L—low; M—moderate; S—severe; VS—very severe).
Figure 4. Percentage of months with different classes of precipitation erosivity according to Angot precipitation index (VL—very low; L—low; M—moderate; S—severe; VS—very severe).
Atmosphere 15 00338 g004
Figure 5. Rainfall erosivity according to the MFI for the period 2000–2021.
Figure 5. Rainfall erosivity according to the MFI for the period 2000–2021.
Atmosphere 15 00338 g005
Figure 6. Distributions of extreme precipitation months: (a) extremely wet months during two periods (as percentage of extremely wet months for the period 2000–2021; (b) extremely dry months during two periods (as percentage of extremely dry months for the period 2000–2021.
Figure 6. Distributions of extreme precipitation months: (a) extremely wet months during two periods (as percentage of extremely wet months for the period 2000–2021; (b) extremely dry months during two periods (as percentage of extremely dry months for the period 2000–2021.
Atmosphere 15 00338 g006
Figure 7. Distributions of extremely dry and wet months during the cold (October–March) and warm (April–September) half-years for two 10-year periods.
Figure 7. Distributions of extremely dry and wet months during the cold (October–March) and warm (April–September) half-years for two 10-year periods.
Atmosphere 15 00338 g007
Table 1. Precipitation distribution based on PCIs according to Lukic et al. [24].
Table 1. Precipitation distribution based on PCIs according to Lukic et al. [24].
Precipitation DistributionPCI
Uniform≤10
Moderate>10 ≤ 15
Irregular>15 ≤ 20
Strongly irregular>20
Table 2. Susceptibility classes for precipitation triggering soil erosion according to Angot precipitation index (K) (after [18]).
Table 2. Susceptibility classes for precipitation triggering soil erosion according to Angot precipitation index (K) (after [18]).
Pluviometric attributeVery dryDryNormalRainyVery rainy
Pluvial erodibility classVery lowLowModerateSevereVery severe
Angot index values (K)<0.991.00–1.491.50–1.992.00–2.49>2.50
Table 3. The rainfall erosivity classes (based on Fournier index—FI and modified Fournier index—MFI) according to Lukic et al. [10].
Table 3. The rainfall erosivity classes (based on Fournier index—FI and modified Fournier index—MFI) according to Lukic et al. [10].
Erosivity ClassFI; MFI
Very low0 < FI ≤ 20; 0 < MFI ≤ 60
Low20 < FI ≤ 40; 60 < MFI ≤ 90
Moderate40 < FI ≤ 60; 90 < MFI ≤ 120
Severe60 < FI ≤ 80; 120 < MFI ≤ 160
Very severe80 < FI ≤ 100; 160 < MFI
Extremely severe100 < FI
Table 4. Multiannual precipitation (mm) for the period 2000–2021 (The stations are arranged from north (left) to south (right).).
Table 4. Multiannual precipitation (mm) for the period 2000–2021 (The stations are arranged from north (left) to south (right).).
HaskovoKardzhaliDzhebelMomchilgradZlatogradKirkovoTokachka
P (mm)710706881876111312131165
Table 5. Percentages of the years during the period 2000–2021 with different classes of rainfall erosivity according to the MFI (as percentages of the total number of years in the period 2000–2001).
Table 5. Percentages of the years during the period 2000–2021 with different classes of rainfall erosivity according to the MFI (as percentages of the total number of years in the period 2000–2001).
StationModerateHighVery High
Haskovo8911
Kardzhali8317
Dzhebel7327
Zlatograd234532
Momchilgrad503614
Kirkovo42373
Tokachka183745
Table 6. Trend, minimum and maximum MFI values, and years of occurrence for the period 2000–2021 (bold values of trend are statistically significant at a level of 0.05).
Table 6. Trend, minimum and maximum MFI values, and years of occurrence for the period 2000–2021 (bold values of trend are statistically significant at a level of 0.05).
StationMin MFI/YearMax MFI/YearMFI Trend/10 Years
Haskovo43.0 (2000)141.0 (2012)13.975
Dzhebel61.0 (2011)144.0 (2021)17.561
Zlatograd71.0 (2000)263.0 (2013)47.544
Momchilgrad71.0 (2000)263.0 (2013)19.029
Kirkovo83.0 (2011)250.0 (2017, 2021)27.583
Tokachka72.0 (2008)271.0 (2012)13.653
Table 7. Correlation coefficients between the MFI and the precipitation characteristics for the period 2000–2021. Values in bold are statistically significant at p = 0.05.
Table 7. Correlation coefficients between the MFI and the precipitation characteristics for the period 2000–2021. Values in bold are statistically significant at p = 0.05.
StationDry MonthsWet MonthsAnnual PrecipitationOctober–MarchApril–September
Dry MonthsWet MonthsDry MonthsWet Months
Haskovo−0.160.830.860.230.61−0.160.50
Kardzhali0.100.370.48−0.180.200.350.04
Dzhebel−0.300.800.85−0.210.44−0.170.49
Zlatograd−0.040.550.82−0.090.640.090.05
Momchilgrad0.140.470.75−0.150.440.260.14
Kirkovo−0.230.500.84−0.030.320.12−0.08
Tokachka0.130.630.790.090.190.380.07
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikolova, V.; Nikolova, N.; Stefanova, M.; Matev, S. Annual and Seasonal Characteristics of Rainfall Erosivity in the Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria). Atmosphere 2024, 15, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030338

AMA Style

Nikolova V, Nikolova N, Stefanova M, Matev S. Annual and Seasonal Characteristics of Rainfall Erosivity in the Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria). Atmosphere. 2024; 15(3):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikolova, Valentina, Nina Nikolova, Miloslava Stefanova, and Simeon Matev. 2024. "Annual and Seasonal Characteristics of Rainfall Erosivity in the Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria)" Atmosphere 15, no. 3: 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop