Next Article in Journal
Tropospheric Ozone: A Critical Review of the Literature on Emissions, Exposure, and Health Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Trend Analysis and Spatial Source Attribution of Surface Ozone in Chaozhou, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of CO2 Emissions in China Based on Multivariate Spatial Statistics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) in Terrestrial Ecosystem: What We Know and What We Do Not

by
Jiaxin Li
1,2,
Lidu Shen
1,
Yuan Zhang
1,
Yage Liu
1,
Jiabing Wu
1 and
Anzhi Wang
1,*
1
CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2024, 15(7), 778; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070778 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 May 2024 / Revised: 17 June 2024 / Accepted: 21 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Emission and Carbon Neutrality in China)

Abstract

Over the past six decades, carbonyl sulfide (COS) in terrestrial ecosystems has been extensively studied, with research focusing on exploring its ecological and environmental effects, estimating source–sink volume, and identifying influencing factors. The global terrestrial COS sink has been estimated to be about 1.194–1.721 Tg a−1, with the terrestrial sink induced by plants and soils 0.50–1.20 Tg a−1, accounting for 41%–69% of the total. Hence, the role of plants and soils as COS sinks has been extensively explored. Now we know that factors such as the activity of carbonic anhydrase (CA), leaf structural traits, soil microbial activity, and environmental factors play significant roles in the COS budget. Developments in observational techniques have also made important contributions to the COS budget. This paper provides an overview of the research progress made on COS based on a comprehensive review of the literature. Then, it highlights the current research hotspots and issues requiring further exploration. For instance, it has been demonstrated that there are still significant uncertainties in the estimation of COS sources and sinks, emphasizing the need for further exploration of COS measuring techniques. This review aims to provide comprehensive guidance for COS research in terrestrial ecosystems.
Keywords: carbonyl sulfide; source–sink volume; carbonic anhydrase (CA); leaf structural traits; observation method; model inversion carbonyl sulfide; source–sink volume; carbonic anhydrase (CA); leaf structural traits; observation method; model inversion

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Shen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, A. Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) in Terrestrial Ecosystem: What We Know and What We Do Not. Atmosphere 2024, 15, 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070778

AMA Style

Li J, Shen L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wu J, Wang A. Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) in Terrestrial Ecosystem: What We Know and What We Do Not. Atmosphere. 2024; 15(7):778. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070778

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jiaxin, Lidu Shen, Yuan Zhang, Yage Liu, Jiabing Wu, and Anzhi Wang. 2024. "Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) in Terrestrial Ecosystem: What We Know and What We Do Not" Atmosphere 15, no. 7: 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070778

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop