Advances in Water Distribution Networks
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Overview of the Special Issue
2.1. WDN Simulation and Optimization
- Ciaponi and Creaco [40] present the comparison of five pressure-driven formulations in the context of WDN modelling. The results of two case studies show that the formulations tend to behave similarly in terms of nodal outflows. The formulations with smooth relationship between nodal outflow and pressure head tend to guarantee faster algorithm convergence, in comparison with a relationship with derivative discontinuities. The results yielded by the formulations for low values of the nodal pressure head can be very different;
- Creaco and Pezzinga [41] present the comparison of two different algorithms for the optimal location of control valves for leakage reduction. The former is based on the sequential addition (SA) of control valves: at each step, the optimal combination of valves is searched for, while containing the optimal combination found at the previous step. Therefore, the former algorithm searches for only one new valve location at each step, among all the remaining ones. The latter algorithm consists of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA), in which valve locations are encoded inside individual genes. The results obtained on two WDNs show that SA and GA yield identical results for small number of valves. When this number grows, GA performs increasingly better than SA. However, the smaller computation time of SA may make this algorithm preferable in the case of large WDNs;
- Creaco [42] explores the benefits of water discharge prediction in the RTC of WDNs. An algorithm aimed at controlling the settings of control valves and variable speed pumps, as a function of pressure head signals from remote nodes in the network, is used. Two variants of the algorithm are considered, based on the measured water discharge in the device at the current time and on the prediction of this variable at the new time, respectively. The RTC algorithm attempts to correct the expected deviation of the controlled pressure head from the set point, rather than the currently measured deviation. The results of the applications prove that RTC benefits from the implementation of the prediction, in terms of closeness of the controlled variable to the set point;
- Pérez-Sánchez et al. [43] characterize the water hammer phenomenon in the design of PAT systems, emphasizing the transient events that can occur during a normal operation. This is based on project concerns towards a stable and efficient operation associated with the normal dynamic behaviour of flow control valve closure or by the induced overspeed effect. The analysis shows how precise evaluation of basic operating rules depends upon the system and component type, as well as upon the required safety level during each operation, with emphasis on the analysis of transients.
2.2. WDN Topology and Partitioning
- Giudicianni et al. [44] apply Complex Network Theory to characterize the behaviour of WDNs from a topological point of view. A tool of analysis is provided to help in finding solutions to several problems of WDNs. The application of the methodology to 21 existing networks and 13 literature networks highlights some topological peculiarities and the possibility to define a set of best design parameters for ex-novo WDNs. Also, the interplay between topology and some performance requirements of WDNs is discussed;
- Liu et al. [45] present a comparative analysis of three partitioning methods, including Fast Greedy, Random Walk, and Metis, which are commonly used to establish the DMAs in water distribution systems. A complex water distribution network is used for comparison considering two cases, i.e., unweighted and weighted edges, where the weights are represented by the demands. The results obtained from the case study network show that the Fast Greedy method is more effective in the weighted graph partitioning. The study provides an insight for the application of the topology-based partitioning methods to establish district metered areas in a water distribution network.
2.3. Water Quality
- Quintiliani et al. [46] propose a methodology for estimating the vulnerability with respect to users’ exposure to disinfection by-products (DPBs) in WDNs. The presented application considers total trihalomethane (TTHM) concentrations, but the methodology can be used also for other types of DPBs. Five vulnerability indexes are adopted. The results obtained on five case studies suggest that the introduced indexes identify different critical areas in terms of elevated concentrations of TTHMs. This allows identification of the higher risk nodes in terms of different kinds of exposure (short period of exposure to high TTHMs values, or chronic exposure to low concentrations);
- Peng and Mayorga [47] propose a statistical multiple objectives optimization, namely Multiple Source Waters Blending Optimization (MSWBO), to find optimal blending ratios of source waters for minimizing three heavy metals (HMR) in a WDN. Three response surface equations are applied to describe the reaction kinetics of HMR, and three dual response surface equations are used to track the standard deviations of the three response surface equations. A weighted sum method is performed for the multi-objective optimization problem to minimize three HMRs simultaneously. The experimental data of a pilot distribution system are used to demonstrate the model’s applicability, computational efficiency, and robustness.
2.4. Service Effectiveness
- Jang and Choi [48] estimate the NRW ratio, that is the ratio of losses from unbilled authorized consumption and apparent and real losses to the total water supply. NRW is an important parameter for prioritizing the improvement of a WDN. The paper shows that the accuracy of multiple regression analysis (MRA) is low compared to the measured NRW ratio, where the accuracy of estimation by an artificial neural network (ANN) with the optimal number of neurons, is higher;
- Mokssit et al. [49] propose a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of water distribution service in the context of intermittent supply, based on a comparison of joint results from literature reviews and feedback from drinking water operators who had managed these networks, with standards for defining the effectiveness of drinking water service. The results are used to structure an evaluation framework for water service and to develop improvement paths defined in intermittent networks. The resulting framework highlights the means available to water stakeholders to assess their operational and management performance in achieving the improvement objectives defined by the environmental and socio-economic contexts in which the network operates. Practical examples of intermittent system management are collected from water system operators and presented for illustration purposes.
3. Discussion
4. Conclusions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Walski, T.M.; Chase, D.V.; Savic, D.A.; Grayman, W.; Beckwith, S.; Koelle, E. Advanced Water Distribution Modeling and Management; Haestad Methods, Inc.: Waterbury, CT, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Bhave, P.R. Node flow analysis of water distribution systems. J. Transp. Eng. 1981, 107, 457–467. [Google Scholar]
- Wagner, B.J.M.; Shamir, U.; Marks, D.H. Water distribution reliability: Simulation method. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 1988, 114, 276–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujiwara, O.; Li, J. Reliability analysis of water distribution networks in consideration of equity, redistribution, and pressuredependent demand. J. Water Resour. Res. 1998, 34, 1843–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucciarelli, T.; Criminisi, A.; Termini, D. Leak Analysis in Pipeline System by Means of Optimal Value Regulation. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1999, 125, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanyimboh, T.; Templeman, A. Seamless pressure-deficient water distribution system model. J. Water Manag. 2010, 163, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ciaponi, C.; Franchioli, L.; Murari, E.; Papiri, S. Procedure for defining a pressure-outflow relationship regarding indoor demands in pressure-driven analysis of water distribution networks. Water Resour. Manag. 2015, 29, 817–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frauendorfer, R.; Liemberger, R. The Issues and Challenges of Reducing Non-Revenue Water; Asian Development Bank: Mandaluyong, Philippines, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, J.J. The Primary Factor of Management Evaluation Indicators for Local Public Water Supplies & Suggestion of Alternative Evaluation Indicators. J. Korean Policy Stud. 2012, 12, 139–159. [Google Scholar]
- Lambert, A.O.; Brown, T.G.; Takizawa, M.; Weimer, D. A Review of Performance Indicators for Real Losses from Water Supply Systems. J. Water SRT Aqua 1999, 48, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shinde, V.R.; Hirayama, N.; Mugita, A.; Itoh, S. Revising the Existing Performance Indicator System for Small Water Supply Utilities in Japan. Urban Water J. 2013, 10, 377–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jowitt, P.W.; Xu, C. Optimal Valve Control in Water-Distribution Networks. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 1990, 116, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, L.; Porto, R.; Chaudhry, F. Optimal location of control valves in pipe networks by genetic algorithm. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 1997, 123, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araujo, L.; Ramos, H.; Coelho, S. Pressure control for leakage minimisation in water distribution systems management. Water Resour. Manag. 2006, 20, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pezzinga, G.; Gueli, R. Discussion of “Optimal Location of Control Valves in Pipe Networks by Genetic Algorithm”. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 1999, 125, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creaco, E.; Pezzinga, G. Embedding Linear Programming in Multi Objective Genetic Algorithms for Reducing the Size of the Search Space with Application to Leakage Minimization in Water Distribution Networks. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 69, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Covelli, C.; Cozzolino, L.; Cimorrelli, L.; Della Morte, R.; Pianese, D. Optimal Location and Setting of PRVs in WDS for Leakage Minimization. Water Resour. Manag. 2016, 30, 1803–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campisano, A.; Creaco, E.; Modica, C. RTC of valves for leakage reduction in water supply networks. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2010, 136, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creaco, E.; Franchini, M. A new algorithm for the real time pressure control in water distribution networks. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2013, 13, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, P.R.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M.; Yoyo, S. Parameter-Less Remote Real-Time Control for the Adjustment of Pressure in Water Distribution Systems. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2017, 143, 04017050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, P.R.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M.; Mothetha, M.L. Pressure Management of Water Distribution Systems via the Remote Real-Time Control of Variable Speed Pumps. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2017, 143, 04017045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kougias, I.; Patsialis, T.; Zafirakou, A.; Theodossiou, N. Exploring the potential of energy recovery using micro hydropower systems in water supply systems. Water Util. J. 2014, 7, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Sánchez, M.; Sánchez-Romero, F.; Ramos, H.; López-Jiménez, P.A. Energy Recovery in Existing Water Networks: Towards Greater Sustainability. Water 2017, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, H.M.; Borga, A.; Simão, M. New design solutions for low-power energy production in water pipe systems. Water Sci. Eng. 2009, 2, 69–84. [Google Scholar]
- Carravetta, A.; Del Giudice, G.; Fecarotta, O.; Ramos, H.M. Energy Recovery in Water Systems by PATs: A Comparisons among the Different Installation Schemes. Procedia Eng. 2014, 70, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caxaria, G.; de Mesquita e Sousa, D.; Ramos, H.M. Small Scale Hydropower: Generator Analysis and Optimization for Water Supply Systems. 2011, p. 1386. Available online: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=57;vol=6;article=2 (accessed on 12 March 2017).
- Sinagra, M.; Sammartano, V.; Morreale, G.; Tucciarelli, T. A new device for pressure control and energy recovery in water distribution networks. Water 2017, 9, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhammetoglu, A.; Nursen, C.; Karadirek, E.; Muhammetoglu, H. Evaluation of performance and environmental benefits of a full-scale pump as turbine system in Antalya water distribution network. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2017, 18, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balacco, G.; Binetti, M.; Caporaletti, V.; Gioia, A.; Leandro, L.; Iacobellis, V.; Sanvito, C.; Piccinni, A.F. Innovative mini-hydro device for the recharge of electric vehicles in urban areas. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clauset, A.; Newman, M.E.J.; Moore, C. Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 70, 06611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Nardo, A.; Di Natale, M.; Santonastaso, G.; Tzatchkov, V.; Alcocer-Yamanaka, V. Water network sectorization based on graph theory and energy performance indices. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2013, 140, 620–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giustolisi, O.; Ridolfi, L. A novel infrastructure modularity index for the segmentation of water distribution networks. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50, 7648–7661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scarpa, F.; Lobba, A.; Becciu, G. Elementary DMA design of looped water distribution networks with multiple sources. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2016, 142, 04016011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sela Perelman, L.; Allen, M.; Preis, A.; Iqbal, M.; Whittle, A.J. Automated sub-zoning of water distribution systems. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 65, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Di Nardo, A.; Giudicianni, C.; Greco, R.; Herrera, M.; Santonastaso, G. Applications of graph spectral techniques to water distribution network management. Water 2018, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO (World Health Organization). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality—First Addendum to Third Edition, Volume I: Recommendations; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Nilsson, K.A.; Buchberger, S.G.; Clark, R.M. Simulating Exposures to Deliberate Intrusions into Water Distribution Systems. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2005, 131, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanal, N.; Buchberger, S.G.; McKenna, S.A. Distribution system contamination events: Exposure, influence, and sensitivity. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag. 2006, 132, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, M.J.; Janke, R. Importance of Exposure Model in Estimating Impacts When a Water Distribution System Is Contaminated. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2008, 134, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciaponi, C.; Creaco, E. Comparison of Pressure-Driven Formulations for WDN Simulation. Water 2018, 10, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creaco, E.; Pezzinga, G. Comparison of Algorithms for the Optimal Location of Control Valves for Leakage Reduction in WDNs. Water 2018, 10, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Creaco, E. Exploring Numerically the Benefits of Water Discharge Prediction for the Remote RTC of WDNs. Water 2018, 9, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Sánchez, M.; López-Jiménez, P.A.; Ramos, H.M. PATs Operating in Water Networks under Unsteady Flow Conditions: Control Valve Manoeuvre and Overspeed Effect. Water 2018, 10, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giudicianni, C.; Di Nardo, A.; Di Natale, M.; Greco, R.; Santonastaso, G.F.; Scala, A. Topological Taxonomy of Water Distribution Networks. Water 2018, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, C.; Fu, G. Comparing Topological Partitioning Methods for District Metered Areas in the Water Distribution Network. Water 2018, 10, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quintiliani, C.; Di Cristo, C.; Leopardi, A. Vulnerability Assessment to Trihalomethane Exposure in Water Distribution Networks. Water 2018, 10, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, W.; Mayorga, R.V. Developing a Statistical Model to Improve Drinking Water Quality for Water Distribution System by Minimizing Heavy Metal Releases. Water 2018, 10, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, D.; Choi, G. Estimation of Non-Revenue Water Ratio Using MRA and ANN in Water Distribution Networks. Water 2018, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokssit, A.; de Gouvello, B.; Chazerain, A.; Figuères, F.; Tassin, B. Building a Methodology for Assessing Service Quality under Intermittent Domestic Water Supply. Water 2018, 10, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Creaco, E.; Pezzinga, G. Advances in Water Distribution Networks. Water 2018, 10, 1546. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111546
Creaco E, Pezzinga G. Advances in Water Distribution Networks. Water. 2018; 10(11):1546. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111546
Chicago/Turabian StyleCreaco, Enrico, and Giuseppe Pezzinga. 2018. "Advances in Water Distribution Networks" Water 10, no. 11: 1546. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111546
APA StyleCreaco, E., & Pezzinga, G. (2018). Advances in Water Distribution Networks. Water, 10(11), 1546. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111546