In the published article [1] the authors noticed an error in the ‘Percolation or Capillary Rise’ values reported in Table 4, column 4, and wish to make the following correction to their paper [1]: Table 4 should be replaced with the following:
| Actual Evapotranspiration (mm) | Irrigation (mm) | Percolation (−) or Capillary Rise (+) (mm) | WUE (%) | |
| Maize | 449 | 620 (438, 705) | −589 (−243, −732) | 50 (61, 44) |
| Irrigated poplar | 348 | 300 (300, 300) | −247 (−215, −252) | 57 (50, 58) |
| Rainfed poplar | 487 | 0 | −18 (+232, −57) | 159 (149, 159) |
| WDA rice | 537 | 1394 (964, 1620) | −1002 (−491, −1206) | 34 (43, 29) |
| WFL rice | 592 | 1852 (1508, 2210) | −1266 (−860, −1693) | 28 (32, 23) |
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.
Reference
- Mayer, A.; Rienzner, M.; Cesari de Maria, S.; Romani, M.; Lasagna, A.; Facchi, A. A Comprehensive Modelling Approach to Assess Water Use Efficiencies of Different Irrigation Management Options in Rice Irrigation Districts of Northern Italy. Water 2019, 11, 1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).