Assessment of the Erosion and Outflow Intensity in the Rif Region under Different Land Use and Land Cover Scenarios
, Shuraik Kader 3,4,*, Youssef Bammou 5, Mourad Aqnouy 6, Said Courba 1, Mohamed Beroho 7, Hamza Briak 8, Velibor Spalevic 9, Alban Kuriqi 10,11,* and Artan Hysa 12Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsAll comments are provided in a PDF file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Minor editing of English language required.
Author Response
"Please see the attachment."
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsIn the manuscript, the authors applied the IntErO algorithm based on the EPM model assessed the sediment production under Moroccan environmental conditions. In my view, the author did not propose any new findings or ideas, this article is more like an engineering report. It does not reach the level of publication in the journal of LAND.
1.The manuscript should emphasize the innovation of their own research and academic contributions in the introduction. 2.The coordinates of the map in the article are not clear, and the resolution of the map is too low. 3.Abbreviations in the text need to be explained clearly，especially in abstract and introduction. 4.The manuscript lacks a discussion of the result. Comments on the Quality of English Language
The Quality of English Language is ok.
Author Response
"Please see the attachment."
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsTanger Med Port: it is not clear the sense of the paper in this field. You cite 3 times in the abstract, 1 in the key words 1 in a caption and 1 in the line 411. It seems that you wrote an abstract before the paper, or something like that.
You make a correct description of the method to analysis the erosion of the basin, ending in the dam; at that point which is the relation with the Tanger Med port?
The paper is interesting and it is well developed, talking about LULC of the basin and wathever consequent to the dam.
78-79 maybe a citation
171-172 and 174-175 you can number estimates and predicts
185 anything is not clear
565 – 566 number results
Author Response
"Please see the attachment."
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 4 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsAuthors evaluated the erosion and outflow intensity in the Rif region under different LULC scenarios, generally, this manuscript had good novelty. Minor suggestions are as follows:
Suggest authors divided the results and discussions parts as separate part, especially, discussion is an important part of one paper, so authors should consider the discussion as the single part. In addition, the dpi of each figure should improve.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageMinor editing of English language required
Author Response
"Please see the attachment."
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe authors of the work adopted the suggestions and corrected the errors in the work. Also, based on their detailed explanations, their suggestions that certain aspects of the work remain unchanged are adopted.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageMinor editing of English language required.
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authorsits a good job, the present form of the paper can publish on the Land.
Comments on the Quality of English Languageits a good job, the present form of the paper can publish on the Land.
