Unveiling the Trajectories and Trends in Women-Inclusive City Related Studies: Insights from a Bibliometric Exploration

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper "Unveiling the Trajectories and Trends in Women-Inclusive City-Related Studies: Insights from a Bibliometric Exploration" covers a very important topic that has been neglected in many urban studies. The overall quality and novelty of the work are excellent. More so, the study covers global perspectives with studies from all over the world.

Therefore, after careful review and consideration, I recommend that it be accepted for publication.

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor correction may be done

Author Response

Thank you for your encouraging remarks and suggestions for publication. We are glad to hear that you value the topic and appreciate the quality and freshness of our work. We appreciate your recognition of the global viewpoints presented in our study. Your support and suggestions are extremely valuable to us. We hope this paper can be a solid foundation in women-inclusive cities studies, direct future research to accelerate efforts to address gender inequities, and assist decision-makers in translating academic insight into best practices and practical recommendations to inform future gender-responsive urban policies and initiatives. Additionally, to improve the quality of our paper's English, we have tried our best to polish the language in the revised manuscript. We have also reviewed and corrected any typos in the revised manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. We hope you find the revised version of our manuscript satisfactory.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I think the paper has its important purpose of providing a comprehensive reservoir on the study of women-inclusive cities. The methodology is meticulous and well-designed. However, I think the writer(s) need(s) to make clear about the significance of such reservoir in contributing the discussion of this increasingly important topic. What would such reservoir apart from knowing the trends. What would be the paper's conclusion in such endeavors?

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

N/A

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for the opportunity to read this manuscript. This study is a systematic review of literature on women-inclusive cities. It is a very well structured and written piece of research that significantly contributes to knowledge in the area of urban gender studies. My suggestions for the paper are minor as I believe the paper is already very strong. 

* Page 4 line 162 I suggest replacing the word "roused" with "increased" for readability

* The labels on Figure 5 could be edited to numbers to correspond with the numbered references cited in Table 5. This would enable the reader to identify the matching cluster nodes more clearly. 

* There are many figures and tables included in the manuscript. If you needed to reduce the volume of Figures, Figure 6 did not add anything particularly useful to the manuscript. 

* The font in the title of Figure 7, Figure 8 is incorrect

* The labels in Figure 8 are exceptionally small and too small to be read. This might be ok in an online version of the paper but when I printed a copy it was impossible to read.

* The conclusion is well written and insightful. I congratulate the authors on a great contribution.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf