Next Article in Journal
Construction of Ecological Security Patterns and Evaluation of Ecological Network Stability under Multi-Scenario Simulation: A Case Study in Desert–Oasis Area of the Yellow River Basin, China
Previous Article in Journal
How Does Density Impact Carbon Emission Intensity: Insights from the Block Scale and an Optimal Parameters-Based Geographical Detector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Urban Landscapes in Hot–Dry Regions: Climate-Adaptive Courtyards

Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2024, 13(7), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071035
Submission received: 30 May 2024 / Revised: 2 July 2024 / Accepted: 4 July 2024 / Published: 10 July 2024

Abstract

:
In hot and arid environments, courtyards are essential architectural elements that significantly contribute to microclimate regulation and enhanced thermal comfort. Beyond providing protection against environmental severities, these spaces elevate the standards of livability and sustainability in urban design. The traditional landscape of Mardin, Turkey, exemplifying such challenges, takes center stage in this study, where courtyards hold a prominent role in architectural composition. Facilitated by the ENVI-met software, the evaluation process herein comprehensively analyzes four representative courtyard case studies in Mardin. Key parameters, including air temperature, humidity, predicted mean vote (PMV), and wind speed, are considered to gain a nuanced understanding of their thermal dynamics. The initial evaluation of existing conditions reveals varying thermal comfort levels, with higher PMV values indicating discomfort in the courtyards, underscoring the need for interventions to enhance their microclimate regulation and resilience to climate change challenges. This study aims to enhance our comprehension of the relationship between courtyards and microclimate regulation, particularly in hot–dry regions. By examining the design principles and passive strategies of courtyards, this research identifies effective approaches for optimizing courtyard design, aiming to create sustainable and comfortable living environments.

1. Introduction

A courtyard, defined as ‘an enclosed area surrounded by a building or wall and exposed to the sky’, is a common architectural element used to create open spaces between the outdoors and indoors, often located in the center of a building or surrounded by walls or groups of buildings [1]. The design and structure of buildings featuring courtyards have historically been influenced by a blend of social norms, environmental considerations, and cultural preferences, including the need for privacy or the pursuit of social interaction [2,3,4]. The consistent use of courtyards across different cultures highlights their role as an effective strategy for coping with various climatic conditions, demonstrating their widespread functionality and appeal. By utilizing this specific form as part of a passive design strategy, it becomes possible to create a microclimate that can effectively regulate and optimize critical environmental variables such as air circulation, solar heat gain, thermal comfort, and moisture levels, all of which play a vital role in enhancing the overall environmental performance and sustainability of a building [5,6,7]. In this regard, climate-responsive courtyards serve as highly functional open spaces that address environmental requirements by responding to local climatic conditions and providing comfortable living environments throughout the year [8].
For centuries, inhabitants of hot–dry regions have developed a deep understanding of the land and its resources [9]. Hence, they have learned to adapt by developing specialized skills and knowledge that allow them to cope with such challenging environments. This traditional approach has thus become a cornerstone of passive architectural strategies [10], with the use of vegetation in courtyards emphasized to regulate indoor temperature and sunlight exposure efficiently.
Courtyards are designed to partially control natural forces, contributing significantly to the aesthetics and functionality of living environments [11,12]. As illustrated in Figure 1, during the summer season, courtyards can provide shading to the facades of surrounding buildings, in turn protecting the courtyard from intense solar radiation. This not only keeps the buildings cooler, but also reduces the need for air conditioning and other cooling measures, thereby lowering energy consumption and costs. Similarly, during the winter season, courtyards can admit the winter sun and provide a degree of protection from harsh weather and climate events.
Courtyards can be seen any part of the world; however, their effectiveness is related to how far environmental conditions are considered in the design process, in addition to architectural design, building function, and users’ needs, as well as maintenance and management. In the utilization of courtyards, the building form, openings, materials, and the selection of natural elements collectively play a significant role in creating comfortable and sustainable built environments. A well-designed courtyard can provide natural ventilation, daylight, and thermal mass through the strategic use of sunlight, wind, and shade. This reduces reliance on energy-intensive mechanical systems such as air conditioning and artificial lighting, while also enhancing the health and well-being of building occupants. In arid and semi-arid regions, the strategic incorporation of certain plant species and natural materials into courtyards plays a crucial role in preserving environmental balance and fostering sustainable development. However, in other climates, the humidity and cooling effects of these natural components are not required [13]. In this regard, courtyards can be varied in their interpretation to fulfill the demands of a region and its residents, as well as to provide preferable thermal conditions.
The courtyard design is considered appropriate for all climate regions; however, it is particularly well-suited for hot climatic regions, whereas its benefits may be restricted in moderate or cold regions [14]. These outdoor spaces have been used to alter environmental conditions by providing shaded areas to residents that protect them from the harsh effects of the sun, wind, and dust, while also allowing them to engage in various outdoor activities [15]. This study investigates how courtyards influence microclimate regulation in hot–dry regions, focusing on Mardin in southeastern Turkey. It identifies design strategies to enhance thermal comfort and energy efficiency, and address climate change challenges effectively. By doing so, it aspires to contribute to the creation of more resilient and sustainable built environments that prioritize human comfort and well-being. The research question that guides this study is as follows: What is the potential impact of passive design strategies on improving the microclimate conditions of courtyards in hot–dry climates?

2. Materials and Methods

This study’s methodology encompasses several stages, as summarized in Figure 2. The study begins with a comprehensive literature review, followed by a description of on-site data collection. Following this, passive design strategies are developed for specifically chosen courtyards in the case study of Mardin, Turkey. These strategies are tailored to address the unique social functions, distributions, architectural features, and natural factors of the courtyards, considering the constraints of heritage conservation. The approach emphasizes minimal intervention, using Nature-based Solutions (NBS) and passive design to adapt urban areas to climate change scenarios, particularly focusing on heat peaks in hot, dry climates. The effectiveness of these strategies is then evaluated through simulations using the ENVI-met software (version 5.5), allowing for a detailed assessment of environmental improvements and a comparison with comfort thresholds. This multifaceted methodology aims to enhance the environmental performance and livability of urban spaces, particularly within the selected courtyards.

2.1. Microclimate Regulation of Courtyards

Central to this research is the exploration of parameters that influence the microclimate regulation potential of courtyards. This includes an in-depth analysis of morphological factors, such as form, orientation, and surface-to-volume ratio [16,17]; architectural considerations, like material selection, window placement, and shading mechanisms [18,19,20]; and environmental aspects encompassing vegetation, water features, and spatial relation to surrounding buildings [21,22,23]. These parameters, summarized in Table 1, are crucial for devising strategies to optimize courtyard designs to improve microclimatic conditions and enhance the well-being of users [13,24].

2.2. Case Study: Mardin, Turkey

Mardin is one of the cities in the Southeast Anatolian Region of Turkey, and is located in the historical region of Mesopotamia, between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, just north of the border with Syria and just west of the border with Iraq. Mardin, like many other settlements in Upper Mesopotamia, has hosted various cultures for thousands of years due to its historical significance as a hub for trade relationships and transitions, which has led to a diverse ethnic and cultural presence [25]. It stands out as a remarkable city exhibiting a rich cultural heritage, as well as preserving various cultures, religions, and traditional harmony over the years due to its strategic location between Mesopotamia and Anatolia, where the first civilizations emerged [26].
The city has a characteristic architectural and urban morphology. This spatial configuration not only showcases the city’s layered and consolidated experience in overcoming climatic challenges, but also contributed to the recognition of Mardin on the UNESCO World Heritage Tentative List in 2000, under the name “Mardin Cultural Landscape” [27]. The preservation of Mardin’s architectural and urban fabric, amidst its role as an active cultural and commercial nucleus, highlights its pivotal role in the discourse on sustainable urbanism and climate-adaptive design within arid regions.
The urban area of Mardin, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, is located on the southern slope of a mountain. This means that it is open to both the sun and the hot desert wind, while the high mountains in the north prevent cold air masses from entering the region [25]. When it comes to the winter season, the air gets extremely cold in Mardin, which is a high-pressure area due to the mountains, and strong winds are encountered.
The houses feature enclosed, open, and semi-open spaces that are characteristic of spatial design, with each unit supported by a structural system of walls, columns, and arches that connect to each other through vaults [29,30]. As shown in Figure 5, the dwellings are built in a stepped arrangement, with each house higher up the hill than the one in front of it, ensuring that each house receives adequate sunlight and ventilation. The primary facades of Mardin houses face south and receive direct sunlight throughout the day. While the southern orientations of buildings can potentially introduce challenges related to heat gain, this can still be effectively managed through proper design strategies. The south-facing slope provides the benefit of protecting the housing from winter winds, and ensures that refreshing night breezes can reach all homes on the sloped terrain during summer, as opposed to flat terrain, where buildings can block each other and hinder the sensation of a breeze [31].
Turkey’s Southeast Anatolia Region, encompassing Mardin and its neighboring provinces, is among the areas most severely impacted by drought resulting from climate change [32]. The area is renowned for its semi-arid climate, characterized by minimal annual rainfall, substantial variations in temperature throughout the day, low humidity, and cold winters. However, because of climate change, the region’s rainfall and snowfall have decreased even further. This drop in precipitation has resulted in a severe drought in the area. In addition, annual temperature increase will be higher in Mardin compared to other cities in Turkey, and seasonal projections clearly indicate that the temperature increase in summer will be higher than in winter [32]. In other words, the region is currently experiencing the impacts of aridity and high temperatures, especially during the summer season, and this will intensify due to climate change, as shown in Figure 6. Furthermore, increasing temperatures and decreasing rainfall will result in excessive evaporation and water scarcity, and ultimately lead to desert-like conditions [33].
This in-depth study and understanding of the case study of Mardin provides grounds to further investigate the architectural and environmental effectiveness of courtyards, and explore design strategies to maximize their role in microclimate regulation. By enhancing thermal comfort and minimizing energy consumption, this study underscores the importance of courtyard design in promoting sustainable living. It posits that optimizing courtyard layouts is crucial not only for enhancing environmental sustainability, but also for safeguarding and adapting rich architectural and urban legacies against the backdrop of climate change.

2.3. Data Collection

The knowledge derived from the literature review on courtyard design and on the specific context of Mardin was further complemented with field visits to empirically observe the multitude of parameters that significantly influence microclimate regulation within courtyards. For the purpose of this study, the aspects reported in Table 2 were considered and recorded during the site visit.
The morphological aspects assessed include courtyard form, which predominantly manifests as a square, rectangular, ‘L’, or ‘U’ shape, alongside a range of building heights from one to four floors. The aspect ratio (see Equation (1)) in architecture describes the proportion between a structure or architectural space’s contained volume and its outer surface area. This ratio affects the amount of heat gain or loss, ventilation needs, and insulation requirements, making it an important consideration when designing energy-efficient buildings. The Solar Shadow Index (see Equation (2)) is another critical factor impacting a building’s exposure to sunlight and shade, which in turn influence thermal performance and energy efficiency [11].
A s p e c t   r a t i o = A r e a   o f   c o u r t y a r d   f l o o r ( A v e r a g e   h e i g h t   o f   s u r r o u n d i n g   w a l l s ) 2
S o l a r   S h a d o w   I n d e x = S o u t h   w a l l   h e i g h t N o r t h s o u t h   f l o o r   w i d t h
The use of limestone is noted for its thermal properties, coupled with the strategic placement of small window openings and the occasional presence of canopies as shading devices. These all contribute to the passive cooling strategies employed in Mardin’s courtyards. Environmental factors further influence the microclimate, with moderate vegetation presence, a rare incorporation of water elements, and a high proximity to surrounding buildings characterizing the local courtyard settings. This detailed examination underscores the intrinsic relationship between courtyard design and microclimate adaptation in Mardin, illustrating how traditional architectural practices are aligned with environmental sustainability and comfort.
As reported in Figure 7, during the site visit conducted on May 2023, 14 traditional houses were examined. These houses exhibited diverse characteristics, allowing for a preliminary comparison and the selection of 4 cases to proceed with further analysis. The choice of 4 courtyards out of 14 based on their attributes was undertaken to maximize the comparability between them. We selected only U-shaped spaces with variations in floor height, different vegetation types, and incorporated water elements. This selection enables a comprehensive examination of different design elements and their respective impacts on microclimate regulation within courtyards in Mardin, as reported in Table 3.
The investigation on the thermal efficacy of the courtyards primarily integrated climatic data, utilizing meteorological measurements obtained from stations in Mardin. This approach provided comprehensive insights into critical climatic variables, i.e., temperature, humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation, which are fundamental for delineating microclimate conditions and their seasonal shifts. Specifically, analytical emphasis on the dates of 21 June and 14 August was chosen due to their distinct meteorological characteristics, as 21 June corresponds to the summer solstice, characterized by the year’s longest daylight duration and the zenith of solar exposure, while August 14th is historically recognized for recording Mardin’s peak temperature, symbolizing extreme thermal conditions. The aim of this methodological approach was to enable a nuanced exploration of courtyard design’s thermal comfort under diverse and challenging climatic conditions, offering insights into the architectural adaptations necessary for mitigating the impacts of thermal extremes.

2.4. Microclimate Simulations

Considering courtyards’ efficacy in microclimate regulation, the adoption of further strategies could boost their thermal performance, especially in the face of climate change. Our objective was to investigate the influence of various design strategies on the thermal performance of the courtyards. The four selected courtyards were subjected to different design interventions and strategies to assess their effectiveness using the ENVI-met software. By simulating these interventions, the thermal performance of the courtyards was thoroughly examined [34,35]. Our aim was to identify design strategies that can optimize microclimate regulation within courtyards and hence improve thermal comfort for occupants.
ENVI-met, which is widely used in the study of urban microclimates, is designed to analyze microclimates by simulating interactions between buildings, soil, vegetation, and air through the fundamental laws of fluids and thermodynamics [36]. This software utilizes climatic data and some building information to simulate microclimates, providing valuable data on temperature, humidity, airflow, and other relevant parameters. It enables the analysis of various spatial scales, ranging from small areas like courtyards to entire cities, to establish sustainable and resilient living conditions. In the study, simulations were carried out using the ENVI-met 5.5 software. ENVI-met stands out due to its comprehensive consideration of factors like longwave radiation fluxes, local wind profiles, reciprocity between buildings, and environmental effects, making it a preferred choice in environmental modeling among software such as CitySim Pro, RayMan, and Grasshopper plug-ins Ladybug Tools [37,38]. The main reasons for choosing this program were its user-friendly interface, low input demands, and minimal time requirements.
The simulations incorporated various parameters, i.e., PMV (predicted mean vote), relative humidity, potential air temperature, mean radiant temperature, and wind speed. By evaluating these factors, we aimed to assess the occupants’ perceived comfort levels and identify potential areas for improvement in the microclimate regulation of the courtyards in Mardin. As reported in Table 4, PMV and PET (physiologically equivalent temperature) serve as critical indices in the realm of microclimate analysis, offering insights into human thermal comfort by accounting for a range of factors such as air temperature, humidity, air velocity, and personal characteristics, including clothing insulation and metabolic rate.
These indices, utilized within the ENVI-met simulation framework for evaluating thermal comfort in Mardin’s courtyards, facilitate a comprehensive assessment of environmental conditions and their impact on human comfort. While the PMV index predicts the normalized thermal comfort of a large group of people exposed to similar environmental conditions, the PET index takes into account the detailed thermo-physiological aspects and energy balance of the human body in relation to climatic conditions [39]. Through the application of these simulations, this study endeavors not only to quantify the perceived comfort levels of courtyard occupants in Mardin, but also to pinpoint strategies for optimizing microclimate control, thereby enhancing the overall comfort and livability of these traditional architectural spaces.
During the utilization of the ENVI-met software, several assumptions were made to overcome limitations and ensure a feasible simulation process. These assumptions influenced the methodology and outcomes of the study:
  • The simulation area was limited to a smaller section of the actual environment by defining a frame of 50 × 50 × 40 units around each courtyard, with grid dimensions of 1.5 × 1.5 × 3 m. This modeling approach constrained the integration of surrounding built environments in the simulation.
  • The simulations focused solely on the relationship between building density and voids within the urban fabric.
  • Semi-open spaces, arches, and building apertures were excluded from the modeling process due to constraints in the simulation framework.
  • The absence of some existing plants in the program led to the selection of plants with similar characteristics and sizes instead.
  • An individual’s perception of comfort in a courtyard environment can be considerably influenced by variables including age, gender, dress preferences, and personal thermal sensitivity. A 35-year-old male with average clothing was chosen as the representative occupant for the PMV calculations. While this selection provides a basis for assessing thermal comfort, it may not fully encompass the diverse range of occupants and their preferences.

3. Passive Design Strategies in Mardin

While there are various passive design strategies available to improve the microclimate of courtyards [14,40,41,42], this study specifically focuses on the integration of a range of vegetation and water elements, such as pools and fountains. With a concerted focus on maintaining congruence with the established traditional elements endemic to the urban milieu and the cultural heritage protected by UNESCO recognition [43], this research endeavors to cultivate a seamless continuum, thereby enriching the architectural landscape. Potential design interventions include the selection of appropriate plant species that are well-adapted to the local climate, requiring minimal maintenance. The dimensions of a courtyard critically impact the formulation of design strategies. Larger courtyards afford sufficient space to integrate a combination of water features and vegetation, thereby harnessing the synergistic benefits of evaporative cooling and shading. In contrast, smaller courtyards necessitate a more focused and deliberate approach due to spatial limitations. In such instances, designers must prioritize either the implementation of water features, such as water-spraying pools or fountains, or the incorporation of vegetation, such as tall trees with broad leaves, to optimize thermal comfort. In conclusion, developing a comfortable and sustainable microclimate can be achieved while taking into consideration courtyard-specific qualities and restrictions by customizing design interventions. This customized approach was applied to the four selected courtyards, introducing appropriate interventions for each of them. These interventions are summarized in Table 5 below.
Despite its limitations, this study utilized ENVI-met to conduct thermal simulations and evaluate the microclimate regulation within Mardin’s courtyards. First, each case study was modelled through the software, taking into account the topography, as shown in Figure 8. The evaluation process prioritized the two hottest days in Mardin, specifically 14 August and 21 June. The former represents the hottest day recorded in recent years based on meteorological data, while the latter is the longest day of the year. Simulations were executed at noon when the sun was at its highest in the sky, ensuring maximum solar exposure.
The analysis of these two days revealed that, on 14 August, the courtyards experienced significantly higher levels of thermal discomfort than on 21 June. Consequently, the assessment was focused on 14 August, comparing current conditions with the proposed passive design strategies to mitigate thermal discomfort.
In addition to the meteorological data of the selected dates for simulation, ENVI-met needs other input variables that require accuracy for precise simulation results. The location and coordinates of a selected site can be chosen on the software directly; in this study, Mardin (37.31° N, 40.74° E) was selected. A grid size of 1.5 m was used in the modeling process to ensure a high level of precision for each grid. While the soil type and pavement material were chosen from the material library available in the software, special attention was given to customizing the building material selection (i.e., limestone), considering its crucial role as an effective passive design strategy within each site. Lastly, simulations started at 5 a.m. and extended until 5 p.m. (12 h in total) to evaluate the effect of sunlight. This time frame allowed to analyze the changing microclimatic conditions throughout daytime hours. All the input variables used for the simulations are reported in Table 6.

4. Results

The investigation of four different courtyards via ENVI-met simulations produced results on existing and proposed conditions based on the microclimate. In the initial phases, case 1, characterized by a larger aspect ratio, exhibited inferior thermal conditions, potentially attributed to its increased exposure to sunlight compared to the other cases. Case 4 demonstrated the highest level of thermal comfort compared to the others. This could potentially be attributed to a combination of factors, such as the use of vegetation and water elements, as well as a smaller aspect ratio. As shown in Table 7, after implementing minor passive design strategies, improvements were observed in thermal comfort and microclimate regulation for all case studies, although they remained relatively minor. The implementation of design strategies in the case studies resulted in lowered potential air temperature, mean radiant temperature, and PMV, coupled with heightened relative humidity and wind speed values. In other words, the courtyard’s lush vegetation and water features facilitated shade, improved evaporative cooling, and reduced temperature overall. The numerical results are reported in Table 8. The complete summary of the simulated results before and after the proposed interventions is reported as Appendix A.
The main considerations on the results reported in Table 7 and Table 8 can be summarized as follows:
  • In the 12 h simulation conducted, the analysis was primarily focused on the results at 12:00 p.m., as this is when sunlight reaches its peak intensity with the steepest angle of incidence.
  • The research mainly focuses on PMV because the initial investigation into the existing conditions revealed varying thermal comfort levels, with high PMV values indicating discomfort in the courtyards. Although the table includes parameters such as humidity, wind speed, temperature, and PMV, PMV is highlighted in bold because it is a comprehensive parameter that addresses the thermal comfort of users. Essentially, PMV is a combination of these other parameters, and thus serves as a key indicator of overall thermal comfort. The initial investigation into the existing conditions revealed varying thermal comfort levels, with high PMV values indicating discomfort in the courtyards.
  • Along with the incorporation of passive design strategies, significant improvements in the thermal comfort and microclimate regulation of the courtyards were obtained, as evidenced by the selected case studies, and visible in Table 7 and Table 8.
  • Passive design strategies can significantly reduce PMV values and provide better thermal conditions for all case studies, as shown in Table 8. However, the simulation results indicate that excessive heat stress may still be observed, and it may be necessary to incorporate additional strategies.
  • The proposed interventions produce an improvement in the outdoor microclimate conditions. However, the simulated outdoor conditions do not adequately achieve desired comfort levels. The adoption of a minimally invasive approach to intervention due to the historical context and the heritage preservation constraints may explain the limited visibility of benefits. This highlights a significant challenge in adapting historical areas: the current scope of allowable interventions is insufficient.

5. Conclusions

This study addresses the microclimate regulation potential of courtyards in hot–dry regions, specifically focusing on the city of Mardin, Turkey. While the existing literature underscores the effectiveness of courtyards as passive design elements, there remains a paucity of research on optimizing their performance under evolving climatic conditions and utilizing advanced simulation tools like ENVI-met.
Despite certain interventions providing improvements, the necessity of minimal interventions to preserve the historical context limited the extent of these improvements. As a result, the ideal PMV values indicated in Table 4 could not be achieved according to the simulation results, indicating that these improvements did not meet anticipated levels. This underscores a fundamental tension between the imperatives of conservation and the urgency of adaptation within the broader context of recognizing the intrinsic value of cultural heritage in enhancing urban resilience and community preparedness. Urban environments must navigate the dual pressures of conserving historical integrity and adapting to climate change, necessitating a delicate balance between these occasionally conflicting goals. The preservation of cultural heritage not only enhances urban resilience and community preparedness, but also serves as a crucial asset for future adaptation strategies.
This study demonstrates that courtyards enhance thermal comfort and mitigate the adverse effects (e.g., excessive solar radiation, high temperatures, wind exposure) of harsh climates. Thermal simulations using ENVI-met revealed that the incorporation of vegetation and water elements improved thermal conditions within the selected courtyards. However, while ENVI-met is effective for measuring outdoor microclimates, its limitations in small-scale areas may have affected the accuracy of the results. The outcomes were likely influenced by modeling only a limited portion of the context, using similar rather than precise plant species, and omitting critical details such as building openings and semi-open spaces. This conclusion is fully consistent with the results provided by other scholars [36].
Given the software’s limitations in delivering precise results, it is crucial to incorporate additional verification methods, such as field measurements, to validate the effectiveness of implemented strategies and enhance the reliability of research findings. These findings provide critical insights for architects and designers aiming to create sustainable and comfortable living environments in hot–dry regions. By adopting the design principles and strategies outlined in this study, the performance and adaptability of courtyards can be significantly improved, thus contributing to the resilience of buildings in response to climate change. Future research should explore additional passive design strategies, such as integrating shade structures like pergolas, to further enhance thermal performance. Additionally, comparative studies evaluating the accuracy and reliability of various simulation tools, including EnergyPlus and IESVE, are recommended to advance the field of courtyard microclimate analysis. Addressing these research directions will enhance our understanding of courtyard design and simulation, ultimately leading to the development of more effective and sustainable architectural solutions.
Furthermore, while this study primarily addresses the thermal comfort within courtyards, it opens the door for future research to investigate the impact on indoor thermal comfort. Understanding how courtyards influence the internal environments of adjacent buildings can offer a more holistic approach to passive cooling strategies, ultimately contributing to the overall energy efficiency and comfort of the entire building complex.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.N.T., H.B.U. and M.S.L.; methodology, J.N.T., H.B.U. and M.S.L.; software, H.B.U.; validation, J.N.T., M.S.L. and O.O.; formal analysis, H.B.U.; investigation, H.B.U.; resources, H.B.U.; data curation, H.B.U.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B.U.; writing—review and editing, J.N.T., M.S.L. and O.O.; visualization, H.B.U.; supervision, J.N.T.; project administration, J.N.T.; funding acquisition, J.N.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by European Union’s Horizon Europe programme (Grant Agreement Number 101138449—MI-TRAP—MItigating TRansport-related Air Pollution in Europe).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The simulations focused on evaluating essential variables such as air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, PMV, and MRT. For each case study, twenty maps were generated to visually represent different variables. These maps included the existing conditions on 21 June, the existing conditions on 14 August, as well as proposal and comparison maps for August 14th. In the final step, comparison maps were generated for analysis and to evaluate the difference between the existing and proposed conditions.
Table A1. Process of simulating Şahtana Mansion through ENVI-met.
Table A1. Process of simulating Şahtana Mansion through ENVI-met.
Case 1
Şahtana Mansion
Potential Air TemperatureMean Radiant TemperaturePmvRelative HumidityWind Speed
21 June 2022 at 12 p.m.
Existing
Land 13 01035 i028Land 13 01035 i029Land 13 01035 i030Land 13 01035 i031Land 13 01035 i032
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Existing
Land 13 01035 i033Land 13 01035 i034Land 13 01035 i035Land 13 01035 i036Land 13 01035 i037
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Proposal
Land 13 01035 i038Land 13 01035 i039Land 13 01035 i040Land 13 01035 i041Land 13 01035 i042
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Comparision
Land 13 01035 i043Land 13 01035 i044Land 13 01035 i045Land 13 01035 i046Land 13 01035 i047
Table A2. Process of simulating Tatlıdede Mansion through ENVI-met.
Table A2. Process of simulating Tatlıdede Mansion through ENVI-met.
Case 2
Tatlideede Mansion
Potential Air TemperatureMean Radiant TemperaturePmv
(Predicted Mean Vote)
Relative HumidityWind Speed
21 June 2022 at 12 p.m.
Existing
Land 13 01035 i048Land 13 01035 i049Land 13 01035 i050Land 13 01035 i051Land 13 01035 i052
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Existing
Land 13 01035 i053Land 13 01035 i054Land 13 01035 i055Land 13 01035 i056Land 13 01035 i057
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Proposal
Land 13 01035 i058Land 13 01035 i059Land 13 01035 i060Land 13 01035 i061Land 13 01035 i062
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Comparision
Land 13 01035 i063Land 13 01035 i064Land 13 01035 i065Land 13 01035 i066Land 13 01035 i067
Table A3. Process of simulating Ensari Mansion through ENVI-met.
Table A3. Process of simulating Ensari Mansion through ENVI-met.
Case 3
Ensari Mansion
Potential Air TemperatureMean Radiant TemperaturePmv
(Predicted Mean Vote)
Relative HumidityWind Speed
21 June 2022 at 12 p.m.
Existing
Land 13 01035 i068Land 13 01035 i069Land 13 01035 i070Land 13 01035 i071Land 13 01035 i072
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Existing
Land 13 01035 i073Land 13 01035 i074Land 13 01035 i075Land 13 01035 i076Land 13 01035 i077
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Proposal
Land 13 01035 i078Land 13 01035 i079Land 13 01035 i080Land 13 01035 i081Land 13 01035 i082
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Comparision
Land 13 01035 i083Land 13 01035 i084Land 13 01035 i085Land 13 01035 i086Land 13 01035 i087
Table A4. Process of simulating Mansion at Tekeli district through ENVI-met.
Table A4. Process of simulating Mansion at Tekeli district through ENVI-met.
Case 4
Mansion
at Tekeli District
Potential Air TemperatureMean Radiant TemperaturePmv
(Predicted Mean Vote)
Relative HumidityWind Speed
21 June 2022 at 12 p.m.
Existing
Land 13 01035 i088Land 13 01035 i089Land 13 01035 i090Land 13 01035 i091Land 13 01035 i092
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Existing
Land 13 01035 i093Land 13 01035 i094Land 13 01035 i095Land 13 01035 i096Land 13 01035 i097
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Proposal
Land 13 01035 i098Land 13 01035 i099Land 13 01035 i100Land 13 01035 i101Land 13 01035 i102
14 August 2022 at 12 p.m.
Comparision
Land 13 01035 i103Land 13 01035 i104Land 13 01035 i105Land 13 01035 i106Land 13 01035 i107

References

  1. Almhafdy, A.; Ibrahim, N.; Ahmad, S.S.; Yahya, J. Courtyard Design Variants and Microclimate Performance. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 101, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baiz, W.H.; Fathulla, S.J. Urban Courtyard Housing Form as a Response to Human Need, Culture and Environment in Hot Climate Regions: Baghdad as a Case Study. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2017, 6, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nelson, R. The Courtyard Inside and Out: A Brief History of an Architectural Ambiguity. Enq. ARCC J. Archit. Res. 2014, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abass, F.; Ismail, L.H.; Solla, M. A Review of Courtyard House: History Evolution Forms, and Functions. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2016, 11, 2557–2563. [Google Scholar]
  5. Toris-Guitron, M.G.; Esparza-López, C.J.; Luna-León, A.; Pozo, C.E. del Evaluation of the Thermal Performance of Traditional Courtyard Houses in a Warm Humid Climate: Colima, Mexico. Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zamani, Z.; Heidari, S.; Hanachi, P. Reviewing the Thermal and Microclimatic Function of Courtyards. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 580–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haseh, R.H.; Khakzand, M.; Ojaghlou, M. Optimal Thermal Characteristics of the Courtyard in the Hot and Arid Climate of Isfahan. Buildings 2018, 8, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdulkareem, H.A. Thermal Comfort through the Microclimates of the Courtyard. A Critical Review of the Middle-Eastern Courtyard House as a Climatic Response. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 216, 662–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hyde, R. Climate Responsive Design: A Study of Buildings in Moderate and Hot Humid Climates; Taylor & Francis: Oxford, UK, 2013; ISBN 9781315024905. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bulus, M.; Hamid, M.; Lim, Y.W. Courtyard as a Passive Cooling Strategy in Buildings. Int. J. Built Environ. Sustain. 2017, 4, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reynolds, J.S. Courtyards: Aesthetic, Social, and Thermal Delight. In Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2002; Volume 13, pp. 71–72. [Google Scholar]
  12. Al-Masri, N.; Abu-Hijleh, B. Courtyard Housing in Midrise Buildings: An Environmental Assessment in Hot-Arid Climate. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1892–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Taleghani, M. Dwelling on Courtyards Exploring the Energy Efficiency and Comfort Potential of Courtyards for Dwellings in the Netherlands. AB Archit. Built Environ. 2014, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aldawoud, A. Thermal Performance of Courtyard Buildings. Energy Build. 2008, 40, 906–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Edwards, B.; Sibley, M.; Hakmi, M.; Land, P. (Eds.) Courtyard Housing. Past, Present and Future; Taylor & Francis: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodríguez-Algeciras, J.; Tablada, A.; Chaos-Yeras, M.; De la Paz, G.; Matzarakis, A. Influence of Aspect Ratio and Orientation on Large Courtyard Thermal Conditions in the Historical Centre of Camagüey-Cuba. Renew. Energy 2018, 125, 840–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Muhaisen, A.S.; Gadi, M.B. Effect of Courtyard Proportions on Solar Heat Gain and Energy Requirement in the Temperate Climate of Rome. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Muhaisen, A.S. Solar Performance of Courtyard Buildings: In Different Climatic Regions, Using a New Computer Model. In Solar Performance of Courtyard Buildings; VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG: Riga, Latvia, 2010; p. 278. ISBN 978-3-639-27015-0. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ernest, R.; Ford, B. The Role of Multiple-Courtyards in the Promotion of Convective Cooling. Archit. Sci. Rev. 2012, 55, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shashua-Bar, L.; Hoffman, M.E. Quantitative Evaluation of Passive Cooling of the UCL Microclimate in Hot Regions in Summer, Case Study: Urban Streets and Courtyards with Trees. Build. Environ. 2004, 39, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pelorosso, R.; Gobattoni, F.; Leone, A. Green Courtyards as Urban Cool Islands: Towards Nature-Based Climate Adaptation Plans of Compact Cities. City Saf. Energy 2016, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bandurski, K.; Bandurska, H.; Kazimierczak-Grygiel, E.; Koczyk, H. The Green Structure for Outdoor Places in Dry, Hot Regions and Seasons-Providing Human Thermal Comfort in Sustainable Cities. Energies 2020, 13, 2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Clemente, C.; Palme, M.; Mangiatordi, A.; La Rosa, D.; Privitera, R. Urban Green Areas in the Reduction of Cooling Loads. Simulations in the Mediterranean Climate. AGATHÓN Int. J. Archit. Art Des. 2022, 11, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Al-Zamil, F.A. Interior Courtyard and Its Impact on the Well-Being of Inhabitants. Int. Des. J. 2018, 8, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Çağlayan, M. A Methodological Research on the Architectural Features and Conservation of Traditional Mardin Pavilions. Master’s Thesis, Dicle Üniversitesi, Diyarbakır, Turkey, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ozorhon, G.; Ozorhon, I. Learning from Mardin and Cumalıkızık: Turkish Vernacular Architecture in the Context of Sustainability. Arts 2014, 3, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Çağlayan, M. Mardin’in UNESCO Dünya Mirası Listesi’ne Alınma Süreci [The Process of Inclusion of Mardin on the UNESCO World Heritage List]. Int. J. Mardin Stud. 2021, 2, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gabriel, A. Voyages Archéologiques Dans La Turquie Orientale. In Voyages Archéologiques Dans la Turquie Orientale: Planches; E. de Boccard: Paris, France, 1940; p. 374. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bayram Kaya, K. Geleneksel Mardin Evlerinin Tasarım ve Ergonomi Ilişkisi Bağlamında Incelenmesi/Studying Traditional Mardin Houses with in the Context of Design and Ergonomic. Master’s Thesis, Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ, Turkey, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. Özbek, H. Gelenekselden Türeyen Çağdaş Mardin Konut Yerleşimi [Contemporary Mardin Residential Settlement Derived from the Traditional Ones]. Master’s Thesis, Üniversitesi Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Istambul, Turkey, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  31. Karagülle, C.; Demir, Y. Yerel Verilerin Konut Tasarım Sürecinde Değerlendirilmesi: Mardin Örneği [Evaluation of Local Data in Housing Design Process: The Case of Mardin]. İtü Derg. A Mimar. Plan. Tasarım 2010, 9, 83–94. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sen, O.; Bozkurt, D.; Göktürk, O.M.; Dündar, B.; Altürk, B. Türkiye’de İklim Değişikliği ve Olası Etkileri [Climate Change in Turkey and Its Possible Effects]. In Proceedings of the 3rd Taşkın Sempozyumu, Istanbul, Turkey, 29–30 April 2013. [Google Scholar]
  33. Altın, T.B. Mardin ve Nusaybin’de Uzun Yıllık Yağış ve Sıcaklık Gidişlerinin Kuraklık Açısından Değerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of Long Period Precipitation and Temperature Trendlines at Mardin and Nusaybin in Terms of Drought). In İlk Çağlardan Modern Döneme Tarihten İzler II [Traces of History from the Early Ages to the Modern Period II]; Karacoşkun, D., Köse, O., Eds.; Berikan: Ankara, Turkey, 2018; pp. 293–320. ISBN 978-605-7501-36-3. [Google Scholar]
  34. Soflaei, F.; Shokouhian, M.; Tabadkani, A.; Moslehi, H.; Berardi, U. A Simulation-Based Model for Courtyard Housing Design Based on Adaptive Thermal Comfort. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Muhaisen, A.S. Shading Simulation of the Courtyard Form in Different Climatic Regions. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 1731–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. López-Cabeza, V.P.; Galán-Marín, C.; Rivera-Gómez, C.; Roa-Fernández, J. Courtyard Microclimate ENVI-Met Outputs Deviation from the Experimental Data. Build. Environ. 2018, 144, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Naboni, E.; Meloni, M.; MacKey, C.; Kaempf, J. The Simulation of Mean Radiant Temperature in Outdoor Conditions: A Review of Software Tools Capabilities. Build. Simul. Conf. Proc. 2019, 16, 3234–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Naboni, E.; Meloni, M.; Coccolo, S.; Kaempf, J.; Scartezzini, J.L. An Overview of Simulation Tools for Predicting the Mean Radiant Temperature in an Outdoor Space. Energy Procedia 2017, 122, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pezzoli, A.; Bellasio, R. Analysis of Thermal Comfort for Cycling Sport: A Case Study for Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support—Volume 1: WPPDSports, (icSPORTS 2015); SciTePress: Setúbal, Portugal, 2015; pp. 281–289. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ziemeļniece, A.; Īle, U. Criteria of Architectural Composition Design in Residential Courtyards. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 245, 042082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jing, L.; Liang, Y. The Impact of Tree Clusters on Air Circulation and Pollutant Diffusion-Urban Micro Scale Environmental Simulation Based on ENVI-Met. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 657, p. 012008. [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, J.; Liu, J.; Srebric, J.; Hu, Y.; Liu, M.; Su, L.; Wang, S. The Effect of Tree-Planting Patterns on the Microclimate within a Courtyard. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Keshtkaran, P. Harmonization Between Climate and Architecture in Vernacular Heritage: A Case Study in Yazd, Iran. Procedia Eng. 2011, 21, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The distribution of temperature in the street, courtyard, and surrounding areas in hot weather. Drawing by author after Reynolds, 2002 [11].
Figure 1. The distribution of temperature in the street, courtyard, and surrounding areas in hot weather. Drawing by author after Reynolds, 2002 [11].
Land 13 01035 g001
Figure 2. Workflow diagram of the research methodology.
Figure 2. Workflow diagram of the research methodology.
Land 13 01035 g002
Figure 3. General view of historic Mardin, Turkey (by authors).
Figure 3. General view of historic Mardin, Turkey (by authors).
Land 13 01035 g003
Figure 4. Mardin city sections, drawn by Albert Gabriel in the 1930s [28].
Figure 4. Mardin city sections, drawn by Albert Gabriel in the 1930s [28].
Land 13 01035 g004
Figure 5. Relationship between daylight and shade under different sun positions (above), and wind flow scheme (below) in Mardin’s traditional houses [31].
Figure 5. Relationship between daylight and shade under different sun positions (above), and wind flow scheme (below) in Mardin’s traditional houses [31].
Land 13 01035 g005
Figure 6. Precipitation (top) and temperature (bottom) change maps for Turkey with the ECHAM5 global climate model A2 scenario simulation. These changes reflect the differences in the 2070–2099 period from the 1961–1990 period [32].
Figure 6. Precipitation (top) and temperature (bottom) change maps for Turkey with the ECHAM5 global climate model A2 scenario simulation. These changes reflect the differences in the 2070–2099 period from the 1961–1990 period [32].
Land 13 01035 g006
Figure 7. Locations of 14 examined courtyards (represented with lighter red) in Mardin old town, with the focus on 4 courtyards (represented with darker red) selected during the site visit conducted on 30 May 2023 by authors.
Figure 7. Locations of 14 examined courtyards (represented with lighter red) in Mardin old town, with the focus on 4 courtyards (represented with darker red) selected during the site visit conducted on 30 May 2023 by authors.
Land 13 01035 g007
Figure 8. Modelling of selected courtyards using ENVI-met.
Figure 8. Modelling of selected courtyards using ENVI-met.
Land 13 01035 g008
Table 1. Factors affecting microclimate regulation.
Table 1. Factors affecting microclimate regulation.
Anthropic FactorsMorphological
  • Courtyard form
  • Orientation
  • Building height
  • Aspect ratio and Solar Shadow Index
Architectural
  • Materials
  • Window placement
  • Shading devices
Environmental
  • Materials
  • Vegetation
  • Water elements
Natural FactorsEnvironmental
  • Air temperature
  • Humidity
  • Natural ventilation
  • Solar radiation
Table 2. An evaluation of microclimate parameters in the courtyards of Mardin houses based on data collected from 14 visited courtyards.
Table 2. An evaluation of microclimate parameters in the courtyards of Mardin houses based on data collected from 14 visited courtyards.
Morphological FactorsCourtyard form
Building height
Orientation
Aspect ratio and Solar Shadow Index
  • Square, rectangular, ‘L’, and ‘U’
  • 1-2-3-4 floors
  • South orientation
  • It varies depending on the house
Architectural FactorsMaterials
Building openings
Shading devices
  • Limestone
  • Small openings
  • Presence of canopy in some cases
Environmental FactorsNeighborhood buildings
Vegetation
Water elements
  • High proximity
  • Moderately
  • Moderately
Table 3. Observations on the physical and environmental characteristics of the selected courtyards.
Table 3. Observations on the physical and environmental characteristics of the selected courtyards.
HouseBuilding FormOrientationAspect RatioSolar Shadow IndexFloor N.WaterVegetation
Land 13 01035 i001Case 1
Şahtana
Mansion
U formSouth–north7.310.312No-Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia)
-Tea rose (Rosa hybrida)
-Taiwanese photinia (Photinia serratifolia)
-Oriental Arborvitae tree (Platycladus orientalis)
-Japanese pieris (Pieris japonica)
Land 13 01035 i002Case 2
Tatlıdede
Mansion
U formSouth–north2.780.673No-China rose (Rosa Chinensis)
Land 13 01035 i003Case 3
Ensari
Mansion
U formSouth–north1.680.583Fountain-Oriental Arborvitae tree (Platycladus orientalis)
-Johnny jump up plant (Viola tricolor)
-Peppermint (Mentha piperita)
Land 13 01035 i004Case 4
Mansion at
Tekeli District
U formSouth–north3.950.342No-Mulberry tree (Morus)
-Common hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna)
Table 4. Thermal sensations according to PMV and PET values [39].
Table 4. Thermal sensations according to PMV and PET values [39].
PMVPET (°C)Thermal
Perception
Grade of
Physiological Stress
<−3.5<4Very coldExtreme cold stress
−3.5–−2.54–8ColdStrong cold stress
−2.5–−1.58–13CoolModerate cold stress
−1.5–−0.513–18Slightly coolSlight cold stress
−0.5–0.518–23ComfortableNo thermal stress
0.5–1.523–29Slightly warmSlight heat stress
1.5–2.529–35WarmModerate heat stress
2.5–3.535–41HotStrong heat stress
>3.5>41Very hotExtreme heat stress
Table 5. Implementing passive design strategies on the selected courtyards.
Table 5. Implementing passive design strategies on the selected courtyards.
Existing
Plan
Proposal PlanInterventions
Case 1
Şahtana
Mansion
Land 13 01035 i005Land 13 01035 i006Additional water elements
Additional field maple
Case 2
Tatlidede
Mansion
Land 13 01035 i007Land 13 01035 i008Additional wild cherry
Case 3
Ensari
Mansion
Land 13 01035 i009Land 13 01035 i010Additional wild cherry
Case 4
Mansion at
Tekeli District
Land 13 01035 i011Land 13 01035 i012Additional water elements
Table 6. Input variables on ENVI-met for selected case studies.
Table 6. Input variables on ENVI-met for selected case studies.
VariableInput
Location
Model geometry (number of cells of grid)
Cell dimensions
Mardin (37.31° N, 40.74° E)
50 × 50 × 40
1.5 × 1.5 × 3 m
Wall/roof material
Soil type
Pavement material
Limestone
Loamy soil
Concrete pavement light
Simulation days
Simulation starting time
Total simulation time
21 June 2022, 14 August 2022
05:00:00
12 h
Table 7. Predicted mean vote (PMV) of selected courtyards based on simulations on 14 August 2022 at 12 p.m. (with extreme temperature that year). The initial PMV is depicted in the first row, the PMV after the interventions is in the middle, and the comparison between the initial and proposed conditions is in the last row.
Table 7. Predicted mean vote (PMV) of selected courtyards based on simulations on 14 August 2022 at 12 p.m. (with extreme temperature that year). The initial PMV is depicted in the first row, the PMV after the interventions is in the middle, and the comparison between the initial and proposed conditions is in the last row.
Case 1
Şahtana Mansion
Case 2
Tatlıdede Mansion
Case 3
Ensari Mansion
Case 4
Mansion—Teker District
14 August 2022
12 p.m.
PMV Existing
Land 13 01035 i013
Land 13 01035 i014Land 13 01035 i015Land 13 01035 i016Land 13 01035 i017
14 August 2022
12 p.m.
PMV Proposal
Land 13 01035 i018
Land 13 01035 i019Land 13 01035 i020Land 13 01035 i021Land 13 01035 i022
14 August 2022
12 p.m.
PMV Comparison
Land 13 01035 i023
Land 13 01035 i024Land 13 01035 i025Land 13 01035 i026Land 13 01035 i027
Table 8. Maximum difference results of the selected courtyard simulations considering potential air temperature (ΔTPA), mean radiant temperature (ΔTMR), relative humidity (ΔRH), and wind speed (ΔWs), with a focus on predicted mean vote (ΔPMV).
Table 8. Maximum difference results of the selected courtyard simulations considering potential air temperature (ΔTPA), mean radiant temperature (ΔTMR), relative humidity (ΔRH), and wind speed (ΔWs), with a focus on predicted mean vote (ΔPMV).
CourtyardΔTPA (°C)ΔTMR (°C)ΔRH (%)ΔWs (m/s)ΔPMV
Case 1
Şahtana Mansion
−0.09−15.31%0.12%0.01−0.77
Case 2
Tatlıdede
Mansion
−0.10−20.08%0.17%0.01−1.02
Case 3
Ensari Mansion
−0.07−16.34%0.14%0.01−0.88
Case 4
Mansion at
Teker district
−0.15−24.50%0.33%0.01−1.66
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ucer, H.B.; Tzortzi, J.N.; Lux, M.S.; Ogut, O. Sustainable Urban Landscapes in Hot–Dry Regions: Climate-Adaptive Courtyards. Land 2024, 13, 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071035

AMA Style

Ucer HB, Tzortzi JN, Lux MS, Ogut O. Sustainable Urban Landscapes in Hot–Dry Regions: Climate-Adaptive Courtyards. Land. 2024; 13(7):1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ucer, Hatice Busra, Julia Nerantzia Tzortzi, Maria Stella Lux, and Ozge Ogut. 2024. "Sustainable Urban Landscapes in Hot–Dry Regions: Climate-Adaptive Courtyards" Land 13, no. 7: 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13071035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop