Next Article in Journal
Research on the Strength Damage and Permeability Characteristics of Cemented Paste Backfill under Chlorine Salt Erosion and Dry–Wet Cycles
Next Article in Special Issue
Eddavidite, Cu12Pb2O15Br2, a New Mineral Species, and Its Solid Solution with Murdochite, Cu12Pb2O15Cl2
Previous Article in Journal
Genesis of Pb–Zn Mineralization in the Pulang Cu Polymetallic Deposit in Yunnan Province, China: Insights from Analyses of Geology, Fluid Inclusions and C–H–O–S Isotopes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Discovery of “Meteoritic” Layered Disulphides ACrS2 (A = Na, Cu, Ag) in Terrestrial Rock
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Désorite, Pb2(Fe3+6Zn)O2(PO4)4(OH)8, a New Phosphate Mineral Isotypic with Jamesite

1
Mineral Sciences Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
2
Independent Researcher, Dr.-J.-Wittemannstrasse 5, 65527 Niedernhausen, Germany
3
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(2), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020175
Submission received: 21 January 2024 / Revised: 2 February 2024 / Accepted: 3 February 2024 / Published: 6 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection New Minerals)

Abstract

:
The new mineral désorite, Pb2(Fe3+6Zn)O2(PO4)4(OH)8, is a secondary oxidation-zone mineral discovered on the dumps of the Schöne Aussicht mine, Dernbach, Westerwaldkreis, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. The crystals are irregular blades up to about 0.25 mm long, occurring in subparallel and radial aggregates. Désorite is brownish red. It has an orange streak, adamantine luster, brittle tenacity, splintery and curved fracture and two cleavages: {02 1 ¯ } perfect and {001} good. It has a hardness (Mohs) of about 3 and is nonfluorescent in both long- and short-wave ultraviolet illumination. The calculated density is 4.633 g/cm3. Optically, crystals are biaxial (+) with α = 2.00(1), β = 2.02(calc) and γ = 2.10(calc) (white light). The 2V is 54(2)° and the optical orientation is Y ~⊥{02 1 ¯ }, Xa ≈ 13°. The mineral is pleochroic: X yellow brown, Y red brown, Z red brown; X < YZ. The empirical formula from electron microprobe analysis is Pb1.93(Zn0.50Fe3+6.290.21)Σ7.00(P3.90As0.10)Σ4.00O26H8.28. Désorite is triclinic, space group P 1 ¯ ; the unit-cell parameters are a = 5.4389(7), b = 9.3242(13), c = 10.0927(12) Å, α = 109.024(8), β = 90.521(6), γ = 97.588(7)°, V = 478.90(11) Å3 and Z = 1. Désorite has a framework structure (R1 = 0.0487 for 937 I > 2σI reflections) assembled from Fe3+O6 octahedra and PO4 tetrahedra, with Pb occupying cavities in the framework. The Fe3+O6 octahedra in the framework occur in edge-sharing chains, edge-sharing trimers and individual octahedra, all sharing corners with each other and with PO4 tetrahedra. Désorite is isostructural with jamesite and lulzacite.

1. Introduction

More than a century after its most active mining period, there is little evidence of the existence of the Schöne Aussicht mine near Dernbach, Germany. All that remains are overgrown dumps in a wooded area just west of the town. This certainly does not appear to be a very good spot to search for interesting minerals. Nevertheless, mineral collectors have scoured the area, often digging deep pits in hopes of turning up fresher dump material from the deposit’s oxidation zone. One recent find netted the holotype specimen of the new mineral hanauerite, AgHgSI [1]. Herein, we report a second new mineral discovered at the locality—désorite.
The name désorite honours Joy Désor (b. 1990), for his tireless analytical work on mineral unknowns, which has led to the discovery and description of the new minerals ammoniotinsleyite, bojarite, oberwolfachite, oldsite, theuerdankite and hanauerite. Joy did the initial work that suggested that the new mineral described herein could be new. At Joy’s suggestion, the name désorite also honours his noteworthy ancestor Pierre Jean Édouard Désor (1811–1882), a Swiss geologist and professor at Neuchâtel Academy (now the University of Neuchâtel). He was a colleague of Louis Agassiz, among others. His studies on paleontology and glacial phenomena in Europe and North America are of particular note. He was a collaborator on the geological survey of the Lake Superior mineral district in the USA. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Jean_Édouard_Desor) (accessed on 2 February 2024).
The new mineral and its name have been approved by the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) with the number 2023–087 and the symbol Dso. The description is based on one holotype specimen deposited in the collections of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA, under catalogue number 76300.

2. Occurrence, Geological Setting and Mineral Association

Désorite was discovered on the dumps of the Schöne Aussicht mine, Dernbach, Westerwaldkreis, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (50°27′15″ N 07°46′25″ E). (Note that there is another Schöne Aussicht mine near Burbach, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) The mine is the northernmost mine on the Emser Gangzug [2], which stretches northeast from Braubach (Rhine river), crossing the Lahn valley near Bad Ems, to Dernbach. The deposits are hydrothermal quartz-siderite veins usually containing the principal ore minerals sphalerite and galena (Ag-bearing), with minor chalcopyrite, pyrite and gersdorffite. The area belongs to the Rhenish Massif. The main mining period at the Schöne Aussicht mine was from 1850 to 1900. Mining took place down to a depth of 140 m. Lead was mined as cerussite and pyromorphite, and Fe as mixtures of iron oxides. The mine only exploited the oxidation zone; the primary ore zone was never reached. In contrast to the more southerly mines, including the mineral-rich Friedrichssegen mine, there is very little Cu and almost no Zn found at the Schöne Aussicht mine.
Désorite occurs in a secondary, oxidation-zone mineral assemblage in vugs in a goethite-quartz gossan in association with carminite, coronadite and plumbogummite. The obviously strongly oxidized nature of the assemblage and the deep brown-red color of désorite clearly indicate that all Fe in the mineral is in the 3+ state.

3. General Appearance, Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties

Désorite occurs as irregular blades up to about 0.25 mm long in subparallel and radial aggregates (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The blades are flattened on {02 1 ¯ } and elongated and striated parallel to [100]. The observed crystal forms are {02 1 ¯ }, {011}, {01 2 ¯ }, {102} and {10 2 ¯ } (Figure 3). No twinning was observed. The color of the mineral is brownish red. It has orange streaks, adamantine luster, brittle tenacity, splintery and curved fracture and two cleavages: {02 1 ¯ } excellent and {001} good. The Mohs hardness based on scratch tests is about 3. The mineral is nonfluorescent in both long- and short-wave ultraviolet illumination. The density could not be measured because crystals exceed the density of available density fluids. The calculated density based on the empirical formula and single-crystal cell is 4.633 g/cm3. The mineral is insoluble in room-temperature concentrated HCl.
Optically, crystals are biaxial (+) with α = 2.00(1), β = 2.02(calc), γ = 2.10(calc), measured in white light. The 2V determined from extinction data using EXCALIBRW (version 5.0) [3] is 54(2)°. Note that γ was calculated from the γ–α birefringence (0.10) measured with a Berek compensator and β was then calculated from α, γ and 2V. The dispersion could not be observed. The optical orientation is Y ~⊥{02 1 ¯ }, Xa ≈ 13°. The mineral is strongly pleochroic: X yellow brown, Y red brown, Z red brown; X < YZ.
The Gladstone–Dale compatibility [4] 1 − (Kp/Kc) = −0.001 (superior) based on the empirical formula.

4. Chemical Composition

Analyses (12 points on 2 crystals) were performed at Caltech on a JEOL JXA-iHP200F field-emission electron microprobe (EPMA) in WDS mode. Analytical conditions were 15 kV accelerating voltage, 10 nA beam current and 5 μm beam diameter. Insufficient material was available for the determination of H2O, so it was calculated based on the structure (O = 26 and P + As = 4). The crystals did not take a good polish, resulting in a relatively low analytical total. Analytical data are given in Table 1. Note that attempts to record Raman spectra using 532 and 785 nm lasers failed because of the sensitivity of désorite to the lasers even at low power.
The empirical formula (based on 26 O apfu) is Pb1.93(Zn0.50Fe3+6.290.21)Σ7.00(P3.90As0.10)Σ4.00O26H8.28. The simplified formula is Pb2(Fe3+,Zn,☐)7O2[(P,As)O4]4(OH)8. The ideal formula is Pb2(Fe3+6Zn)O2(PO4)4(OH)8 which requires PbO 32.76, ZnO 5.97, Fe2O3 35.15, P2O5 20.83, H2O 5.29, total 100 wt%.

5. X-ray Diffraction

X-ray powder diffraction (PXRD) data were recorded using a Rigaku R-Axis Rapid II curved imaging plate microdiffractometer with monochromatized MoKα radiation. The sample consisted of an aggregate of several crystals and a Gandolfi-like motion on the φ and ω axes was used to further randomize the sample. Observed d values and intensities were derived by profile fitting using JADE Pro (version 8.9) (Materials Data, Inc., Livermore, CA, USA). Data are given in Table 2 and the match between the observed and calculated PXRDs is shown in Figure 4. The triclinic (space group P 1 ¯ ) unit-cell parameters refined from the powder data using JADE Pro with whole pattern fitting were a = 5.438(7), b = 9.327(7), c = 10.088(7) Å, α = 109.02(3), β = 90.561(2), γ = 97.62(3)° and V = 478.7(8) Å3.
The small size and less-than-ideal quality of the crystal limited the dataset, providing a low data-to-parameter ratio of 6.27. The Rigaku CrystalClear (version 2.0) software package was used for processing the structure data, including the application of an empirical absorption correction using the multi-scan method with ABSCOR [5] implemented within CrystalClear. The structure was solved using the intrinsic-phasing algorithm of SHELXT-2014/5 [6]. SHELXL-2016/6 [7] was used for the refinement of the structure. The structure solution in space group P 1 ¯ located all cation and O sites.
With all O sites assigned full occupancy, an initial refinement indicated the Pb site to be split into two sites about 0.6 Å apart. These eventually were refined to occupancies of 0.72(3) for PbA and 0.27(3) for PbB with a separation of 0.62(3) Å. The two P sites (P1 and P2) were refined with joint occupancy by P and As, eventually refining to P1: P0.996(12)As0.004(12) and P2: P0.970(11)As0.030(11). The occupancies of five Fe sites (Fe1, Fe2, Fe3, Fe4 and Fe5) were refined to 1.016(13), 0.983(13), 1.000(13), 0.994(10) and 0.977(9).
To assess the distribution of Fe3+, Zn and vacancies among the Fe sites, we employed the program OccQP (version 0.39) [8], which uses quadratic equations in a constrained least-squares formulation to optimize occupancy assignments based upon site scattering, chemical composition, charge balance, bond valence and cation–anion bond lengths. In the OccQP analysis, the chemical composition (based on the empirical formula), bond valence and site scattering were all allowed to vary with equal weighting. The OccQP-calculated occupancies for the Fe sites (Table 3) were used in the final structure refinement. The final structural formula with the Fe sites combined is Pb1.98(Fe3+6.30Zn0.560.14)O2[(P0.98As0.02)O4]4(OH)8. Note that H atoms were included based on the bond-valence analysis even though H sites could not be located. Without the location of H sites, the hydrogen bonding was somewhat ambiguous. Each of the OH sites could conceivably form H bonds to more than one receptor O site. We have listed all of these and have assigned factored bond valences.
The data collection and refinement details are given in Table 4, atom coordinates and displacement parameters in Table 5, selected bond distances in Table 6 and a bond-valence analysis in Table 7.

6. Description of Crystal Structure

Désorite has a framework structure assembled from edge- and corner-sharing Fe3+O6 octahedra and PO4 tetrahedra. Fe3- and Fe5-centered octahedra share edges to form a chain that alternates between one and two octahedra wide. Fe2- and Fe4-centered octahedra share edges to form a linear trimer. These tightly bonded units are linked to each other by sharing corners with a single Fe1-centered octahedron, thereby forming an octahedral framework. The PO4 tetrahedra, centered by P1 and P2, form additional linkages between the octahedral units. The Pb, split between two sites separated by 0.62(3) Å, occupies cavities within the framework and bonds to surrounding O and OH sites. The octahedral units and their linkages to one another and with the phosphate tetrahedra are shown in a slice of structure viewed perpendicularly to {02 1 ¯ } in Figure 5. The entire structure viewed along [100] is shown in Figure 6.

7. Discussion

Désorite is isostructural with jamesite, Pb2ZnFe3+2(Fe3+,Zn)4(AsO4)4(OH)8(OH,O)2 [11], and lulzacite, Sr2Fe2+3Al4(PO4)4(OH)10 [12]. Jamesite could be regarded as the arsenate analogue of désorite, except that Zn replaces Fe3+ as the dominant cation in the Fe2 site. (Note that our labelling of the sites in the désorite structure differs from that employed for the structure of jamesite; the désorite/jamesite octahedral-cation site correspondence is Fe1/M(3), Fe2/M(2), Fe3/M(1), Fe4/M(4), Fe5/M(5).) As in the désorite structure, the Pb site in the jamesite structure is split into two sites; interestingly, with proportions very similar to those in désorite, Pb(1a): 0.72(2); Pb(1b): 0.28(2). The separation between the split sites is also similar, 0.59(2) Å in jamesite vs 0.62(3) Å in désorite. In both structures, the Pb site splitting results in off-center Pb-O coordinations, clearly attributable to the stereoactive 6s2 lone-pair electrons of Pb2+. By contrast, the Sr site in the luzacite structure is not split and exhibits a well-centered coordination.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R.K.; methodology, A.R.K. and C.M.; investigation, A.R.K., G.M. and C.M.; original manuscript—draft preparation, A.R.K.; manuscript—review and editing, A.R.K., G.M. and C.M.; figures, A.R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded, in part, by the John Jago Trelawney Endowment to the Mineral Sciences Department of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.

Data Availability Statement

The crystallographic information file (CIF) for this paper (deposition number 2330757) are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures (accessed on 2 February 2024).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pekov, I.V.; Zubkova, N.V.; Britvin, S.N.; Agakhanov, A.A.; Polekhovsky, Y.S.; Pushcharovsky, D.Y.; Möhn, G.; Desor, J.; Blass, G.A. New Mineral Hanauerite, AgHgSI, and Common Crystal Chemical Features of Natural Mercury Sulphohalides. Crystals 2023, 13, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Seeliger, A.; Buchert, D.E.; Noll, T. Der Emser Gangzug. Aufschluss 2009, 60, 66–160. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gunter, M.E.; Bandli, B.R.; Bloss, F.D.; Evans, S.H.; Su, S.C.; Weaver, R. Results from a McCrone spindle stage short course, a new version of EXCALIBR, and how to build a spindle stage. Microscope 2004, 52, 23–39. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mandarino, J.A. The Gladstone–Dale compatibility of minerals and its use in selecting mineral species for further study. Can. Miner. 2007, 45, 1307–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Higashi, T. ABSCOR; Rigaku Corporation: Tokyo, Japan, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal Structure refinement with SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wright, S.E.; Foley, J.A.; Hughes, J.M. Optimization of site occupancies in minerals using quadratic programming. Am. Mineral. 2001, 85, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gagné, O.C.; Hawthorne, F.C. Comprehensive derivation of bond-valence parameters for ion pairs involving oxygen. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, B71, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ferraris, G.; Ivaldi, G. Bond valence vs. bond length in O…O hydrogen bonds. Acta Crystallogr. 1988, B44, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cooper, M.A.; Hawthorne, F.C. Local Pb2+-☐ disorder in the crystal structure of jamesite, Pb2ZnFe3+2(Fe3+2.8Zn1.2)(AsO4)4(OH)8[(OH)1.2O0.8]. Can. Mineral. 1999, 37, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  12. Leone, P.; Palvadeau, P.; Moëlo, Y. Structure cristalline d’un nouvel hydroxyphosphate naturel de strontium, fer et aluminium (lulzacite), Sr2Fe(Fe0.63Mg0.37)2Al4(PO4)4(OH)10. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Ser. IIC 2000, 3, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Sprays of désorite blades (bright brownish red) on goethite (darker balls) on holotype specimen 76,300; the field of view is 3.35 mm across.
Figure 1. Sprays of désorite blades (bright brownish red) on goethite (darker balls) on holotype specimen 76,300; the field of view is 3.35 mm across.
Minerals 14 00175 g001
Figure 2. Désorite crystal (70 × 40 × 5 μm) used for the collection of structure data, viewed in plane polarized light (||X).
Figure 2. Désorite crystal (70 × 40 × 5 μm) used for the collection of structure data, viewed in plane polarized light (||X).
Minerals 14 00175 g002
Figure 3. Crystal drawing of désorite; clinographic projection in nonstandard orientation, a vertical.
Figure 3. Crystal drawing of désorite; clinographic projection in nonstandard orientation, a vertical.
Minerals 14 00175 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of the observed (solid black line) and calculated (thin blue vertical lines) PXRDs for désorite.
Figure 4. Comparison of the observed (solid black line) and calculated (thin blue vertical lines) PXRDs for désorite.
Minerals 14 00175 g004
Figure 5. Octahedral–tetrahedral slice in the désorite structure viewed perpendicularly to {02 1 ¯ } with [110] vertical. The Pb sites, which occupy the cavities, are not shown. Possible hydrogen bonds are shown as light blue lines.
Figure 5. Octahedral–tetrahedral slice in the désorite structure viewed perpendicularly to {02 1 ¯ } with [110] vertical. The Pb sites, which occupy the cavities, are not shown. Possible hydrogen bonds are shown as light blue lines.
Minerals 14 00175 g005
Figure 6. The structure of désorite viewed along [100]. The PbA and PbB sites are labelled A and B, respectively. Pb–O bonds are shown as sticks. Possible hydrogen bonds are shown as light blue lines. The unit-cell outline is shown with dashed lines.
Figure 6. The structure of désorite viewed along [100]. The PbA and PbB sites are labelled A and B, respectively. Pb–O bonds are shown as sticks. Possible hydrogen bonds are shown as light blue lines. The unit-cell outline is shown with dashed lines.
Minerals 14 00175 g006
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt%) for désorite.
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt%) for désorite.
ConstituentMeanRangeS.D.Standard/LineNormalized
PbO30.9230.53–31.340.23PbS/Pb Mα32.24
ZnO2.912.59–3.060.15ZnO/Zn Kα3.04
Fe2O336.0235.49–36.760.46Fayalite/Fe Kα37.57
As2O50.840.62–0.870.08GaAs/As Kα0.88
P2O519.8518.67–19.650.40apatite/P Kα20.70
H2O *5.35 5.58
Total95.89 100.01
* Based on the structure (O = 26 and P + As = 4).
Table 2. Powder X-ray diffraction data (d in Å) for désorite. Only calculated lines with I ≥ 2.5 are listed.
Table 2. Powder X-ray diffraction data (d in Å) for désorite. Only calculated lines with I ≥ 2.5 are listed.
IobsdobsdcalcIcalchkl IobsdobsdcalcIcalchkl IobsdobsdcalcIcalchkl
729.4929.527650 0 1 272.2832.29890   4 ¯ 1 301.6131.624100 5 1
8.72550 1 0 2.289172 0 2 1.61952 5 ¯ 1
67.8727.85450 1 ¯ 1 2.2813 1 ¯   3 ¯ 3 1.61533 3 ¯ 2
95.3285.38331 0 0 2.26661 1 ¯ 4 1.60416 2 ¯ 2 4
244.8624.9057 1 ¯ 1 0 152.2312.24080 2 3 311.5931.6013 3 ¯ 0 3
4.80214 1 ¯ 0 1 2.22651 4 ¯ 1 1.5985 2 ¯ 0 5
1004.5844.5801000 2 ¯ 1 2.2184 1 ¯   2 ¯ 4 1.587112 4 0
294.2734.31461 1 0 352.1812.182210 3 2 141.5741.57971 3 ¯ 6
4.27816 1 ¯   1 ¯ 1 2.17592 3 ¯ 1 1.5644 3 ¯ 1 3
593.6873.722141 2 ¯ 1 162.1262.1396 2 ¯   2 ¯ 2 241.5431.5469 1 ¯ 0 6
3.699220 1 2 2.12680 1 4 1.54361 5 ¯ 5
3.655201 1 1 2.11241 3 ¯ 4 1.53631 6 ¯ 2
293.5733.59018 1 ¯   1 ¯ 2 202.0822.082161 4 ¯ 3 71.5111.52730 6 ¯ 3
3.548170 2 1 172.0212.02713 1 ¯   3 ¯ 4 1.51431 6 ¯ 1
273.4833.473211 0 2 201.9962.00590 1 ¯ 5 81.4841.4884 1 ¯ 5 2
3.36250 1 ¯ 3 1.99972 0 3 51.4651.4754 1 ¯   5 ¯ 5
793.3073.305681 2 ¯ 2 1.99061 2 3 171.4361.4423 2 ¯ 4 3
903.1833.20828 1 ¯ 1 2 1.95942-3 3 1.4375 3 ¯ 4 1
3.175671 2 0 171.9161.92371 1 4 1.43350 5 ¯ 6
3.10030 2 ¯ 3 1.90890-3 5 1.4283 2 ¯   2 ¯ 6
172.9442.953210 3 ¯ 2 111.8731.8885 2 ¯   3 ¯ 2 91.4191.4223 2 ¯   5 ¯ 3
2.91141 1 2 241.8541.863211 1 ¯ 5 1.41432 1 5
792.8502.85666 1 ¯   1 ¯ 3 1.84730 5 ¯ 2 141.3981.40652 6 ¯ 1
2.8048 1 ¯ 0 3 251.8211.8354 2 ¯ 0 4 1.3975 1 ¯   2 ¯ 7
322.7752.792221 2 1 1.82815 1 ¯ 0 5 1.3933 1 ¯ 4 4
972.7072.743171 2 ¯ 3 1.8093 3 ¯ 1 0 111.3821.37752 5 0
2.710550 1 3 1.8045 2 ¯   3 ¯ 3 51.3601.36130 0 7
2.68225 2 ¯ 1 0 1.7973 1 ¯   4 ¯ 4 141.3491.35540 2 6
2.67131 0 3 101.7801.77480 4 2 1.34654 0 0
122.6312.618120 3 ¯ 3 1.7503 3 ¯ 2 0 71.3331.33542 0 6
232.5372.55116 2 ¯ 1 1 91.7361.7347 1 ¯ 5 0 111.3011.30930-6 6
2.51980 1 ¯ 4 111.7061.7195 3 ¯   1 ¯ 1 1.29851 7 ¯ 1
2.4845 2 ¯   1 ¯ 1 1.71033 1 0 1.29440 7 ¯ 4
2.47442 1 0 191.6901.695151 3 3 61.2531.25930 2 ¯ 8
502.4522.456132 2 ¯ 1 1.68190 2 ¯ 6 81.2321.2414 1 ¯   7 ¯ 2
2.44628 1 ¯ 3 1 131.6561.6613 1 ¯   5 ¯ 1 1.2233 2 ¯ 6 2
2.41831 3 0 1.65382 4 ¯ 4
122.3142.3398 2 ¯   1 ¯ 2 161.6371.64963 3 ¯ 1
2.31532 1 1 1.6335 1 ¯   4 ¯ 5
Table 3. Results of the OccQP analysis for désorite.
Table 3. Results of the OccQP analysis for désorite.
SiteSite Scattering Values *Site Occupancies According to OccQP
RefinementOccQP
Fe126.35126.326Fe3+0.919Zn2+0.081
Fe225.57925.579Fe3+0.9840.016
Fe325.96425.962Fe3+0.600Zn2+0.3500.050
Fe451.70451.700Fe3+0.920Zn2+0.0650.015
Fe550.83050.830Fe3+0.9780.022
* Site scattering value = mean atomic number × site multiplicity.
Table 4. Data collection and structure refinement details for désorite.
Table 4. Data collection and structure refinement details for désorite.
DiffractometerRigaku R-Axis Rapid II
X-ray radiationMoKα (λ = 0.71075 Å)
Temperature293(2) K
Structural formulaPb1.98(Fe3+6.30Zn0.560.14)O2[(P0.98As0.02)O4]4(OH)8
(incl. unlocated H)
Space groupP-1 (#2)
Unit-cell dimensionsa = 5.4389(7) Åα = 109.024(8)°
b = 9.3242(13) Åβ = 90.521(6)°
c = 10.0927(12) Åγ = 97.588(7)°
V478.90(11) Å3
Z1
Density (for above formula)4.680 g·cm−3
Absorption coefficient23.234 mm−1
F(000)620.2
Crystal size70 × 40 × 5 mm
θ range3.65 to 22.37°
Index ranges−5 ≤ h ≤ 5, −9 ≤ k ≤ 9, −10 ≤ l ≤ 10
Reflections collected/unique2729 / 1213; Rint = 0.076
Reflections with I > 2σI937
Completeness to θ = 22.37°99.10%
Refinement methodFull-matrix least-squares on F2
Parameters/restraints195 / 0
GoF1.026
Final R indices [I > 2σI]R1 = 0.0485, wR2 = 0.0999
R indices (all data)R1 = 0.0670, wR2 = 0.1096
Extinction coefficient0.0007(6)
Largest diff. peak/hole+1.45 / −1.70 e/A3
Rint = S|Fo2Fo2(mean)|/S[Fo2]. GoF = S = {S[w(Fo2Fc2)2]/(np)}1/2. R1 = S||Fo| − |Fc||/S|Fo|. wR2 = {S[w(Fo2Fc2)2]/S[w(Fo2)2]}1/2; w = 1/[s2(Fo2)+(aP)2+bP] where a is 0.0541, b is 1.6 and P is [2Fc2+Max(Fo2,0)]/3.
Table 5. Atom coordinates and displacement parameters (Å2) for désorite.
Table 5. Atom coordinates and displacement parameters (Å2) for désorite.
x/ay/bz/cUeqOccupancy
PbA0.4299(15)0.7603(4)0.5712(3)0.0284(11)Pb0.72(3)
PbB0.322(6)0.7347(19)0.5774(8)0.048(4)Pb0.27(3)
Fe1000.50.0241(10)Fe0.919Zn0.081
Fe200.500.0150(9)Fe0.984
Fe30.5000.0162(9)Fe0.600Zn0.345
Fe40.7445(4)0.6325(3)0.2812(2)0.0166(7)Fe0.920Zn0.065
Fe50.0047(4)0.0769(3)0.1691(2)0.0191(8)Fe0.978
P10.1984(7)0.4349(5)0.2747(4)0.0172(19)P0.996(12)As0.004(12)
P20.2909(7)0.8195(5)0.2310(4)0.0130(17)P0.970(11)As0.030(11)
O10.9884(18)0.5143(13)0.3460(10)0.022(3)1
O20.1885(16)0.2756(14)0.2902(10)0.020(3)1
O30.1986(17)0.4149(13)0.1155(10)0.018(3)1
O40.4520(19)0.5258(13)0.3502(10)0.023(3)1
O50.5181(18)0.7393(14)0.1903(10)0.021(3)1
O60.2762(18)0.8865(14)0.3921(10)0.026(3)1
O70.3011(18)0.9521(13)0.1683(10)0.022(3)1
O80.0440(17)0.7060(13)0.1678(10)0.020(3)1
O90.7863(17)0.8008(12)0.4547(9)0.016(3)1
OH100.2947(17)0.5496(12)0.9041(9)0.018(3)1
OH110.1322(16)0.9748(12)0.6758(9)0.015(3)1
OH120.7086(17)0.1769(13)0.1398(9)0.019(3)1
OH130.8065(19)0.8984(13)0.0090(10)0.021(3)1
U11U22U33U23U13U12
PbA0.029(2)0.0385(11)0.0199(8)0.0094(6)0.0064(9)0.0120(12)
PbB0.057(10)0.049(4)0.034(2)0.003(2)0.014(3)0.026(5)
Fe10.0222(19)0.026(2)0.0230(18)0.0042(16)0.0121(15)0.0100(16)
Fe20.0141(17)0.021(2)0.0103(16)0.0053(14)0.0023(14)0.0045(15)
Fe30.0097(16)0.021(2)0.0170(16)0.0049(14)0.0013(14)0.0029(14)
Fe40.0123(13)0.0241(17)0.0128(12)0.0045(11)0.0034(10)0.0048(11)
Fe50.0140(13)0.0252(17)0.0168(12)0.0048(11)0.0002(10)0.0039(11)
P10.014(3)0.028(3)0.012(2)0.009(2)0.0015(18)0.004(2)
P20.009(2)0.022(3)0.008(2)0.0054(18)0.0026(16)0.0035(18)
O10.015(6)0.040(8)0.017(6)0.013(5)0.002(5)0.014(6)
O20.004(5)0.041(9)0.014(5)0.008(5)−0.002(4)−0.001(5)
O30.016(6)0.025(7)0.013(5)0.003(5)−0.003(5)0.008(5)
O40.028(6)0.033(8)0.013(5)0.012(5)−0.002(5)0.006(6)
O50.016(5)0.036(8)0.016(6)0.015(5)0.002(5)0.003(5)
O60.021(6)0.048(9)0.011(5)0.011(6)0.007(5)0.012(6)
O70.019(6)0.017(7)0.029(6)0.007(5)0.014(5)−0.001(5)
O80.017(6)0.021(7)0.018(5)0.002(5)0.003(5)0.008(5)
O90.018(5)0.016(7)0.010(5)−0.003(5)0.008(5)0.003(5)
OH100.019(6)0.023(8)0.011(5)0.002(5)−0.002(5)0.006(5)
OH110.010(5)0.024(7)0.015(5)0.009(5)0.006(5)0.003(5)
OH120.010(5)0.038(8)0.006(5)0.004(5)0.002(4)−0.001(5)
OH130.022(6)0.031(8)0.013(5)0.010(5)0.004(5)0.008(5)
Table 6. Selected bond distances (Å) for désorite.
Table 6. Selected bond distances (Å) for désorite.
PbA–O92.328(13)Fe1–O9 (×2)1.969(10)P1–O11.504(11)
PbA–O42.582(11)Fe1–OH11 (×2)2.004(9)P1–O21.538(13)
PbA–O22.610(10)Fe1–O6 (×2)2.064(10)P1–O31.556(10)
PbA–O62.640(11)<Fe1–O>2.012P1–O41.566(11)
PbA–OH112.692(11) <P1–O>1.541
PbA–OH122.909(10)Fe2–OH10 (×2)1.961(10)
PbA–O43.159(11)Fe2–O3 (×2)1.990(10)P2–O51.519(11)
PbA–O73.247(11)Fe2–O8 (×2)2.089(10)P2–O61.547(10)
PbA–O13.353(12)<Fe2–O>2.013P2–O71.557(12)
PbA–O63.367(13) P2–O81.581(10)
PbA–O13.511(13)Fe3–OH12 (×2)1.990(10)<P2–O>1.551
PbA–O23.671(13)Fe3–OH9 (×2)2.038(11)
<PbA–O>3.006Fe3–O7 (×2)2.158(10)Hydrogen bonds
<Fe3–O>2.062OH10···O32.749(13)
PbB–OH112.499(14) OH10···O52.998(13)
PbB–O42.651(15)Fe4–O91.921(9)OH10···OH122.728(16)
PbB–OH122.714(13)Fe4–O42.016(11)OH11···O52.970(14)
PbB–O62.715(16)Fe4–O12.060(10)OH11···O62.896(14)
PbB–O92.90(3)Fe4–O52.061(10)OH11···O92.807(15)
PbB–O12.96(2)Fe4–OH102.062(10)OH12···O72.943(13)
PbB–O22.99(3)Fe4–O82.164(10)OH12···OH102.728(16)
PbB–O13.00(3)<Fe4–O>2.047OH13···O32.775(16)
PbB–O23.10(3) OH13···O53.036(14)
PbB–O43.141(13)Fe5–OH111.911(9)
PbB–O93.36(3)Fe5–O21.984(11)
PbB–O73.57(3)Fe5–OH122.030(11)
<PbB–O>2.967Fe5–OH92.070(10)
Fe5–O72.108(11)
Fe5–OH92.140(10)
<Fe5–O>2.041
Table 7. Bond-valence analysis for désorite. Values are expressed in valence units *.
Table 7. Bond-valence analysis for désorite. Values are expressed in valence units *.
PbAPbBFe1Fe2Fe3Fe4Fe5P1P2Hydrogen BondsΣ
DonatedAccepted
O10.04, 0.030.04,
0.03
0.43 1.31 1.88
O20.19, 0.020.03,
0.03
0.531.2 2.00
O3 0.53
×2
1.14 0.07,
0.10
1.84
O40.20, 0.060.07,
0.02
0.49 1.11 1.95
O5 0.43 1.28 0.04, 0.05,
0.06
1.86
O60.18, 0.040.060.43
×2
1.19 0.051.95
O70.050.01 0.30
×2
0.38 1.15 0.071.96
O8 0.40
×2
0.32 1.08 1.80
O90.340.04,
0.02
0.56
×2
0.63 0.061.65
OH10 0.57
×2
0.43 −0.07, −0.04,−0.070.110.93
OH110.160.090.51
×2
0.65 −0.05, −0.05,−0.06 1.26
OH120.100.06 0.48
×2
0.47 −0.07,
−0.11
0.071.00
OH13 0.42
×2
0.42,0.35 −0.10, −0.06 1.04
Σ1.410.503.003.002.402.732.804.764.7
* Bond valence parameters are from [9]; hydrogen-bond strengths based on O–O bond lengths from [10]. Note that bond-valence values are based on the occupancies of the sites.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kampf, A.R.; Möhn, G.; Ma, C. Désorite, Pb2(Fe3+6Zn)O2(PO4)4(OH)8, a New Phosphate Mineral Isotypic with Jamesite. Minerals 2024, 14, 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020175

AMA Style

Kampf AR, Möhn G, Ma C. Désorite, Pb2(Fe3+6Zn)O2(PO4)4(OH)8, a New Phosphate Mineral Isotypic with Jamesite. Minerals. 2024; 14(2):175. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kampf, Anthony R., Gerhard Möhn, and Chi Ma. 2024. "Désorite, Pb2(Fe3+6Zn)O2(PO4)4(OH)8, a New Phosphate Mineral Isotypic with Jamesite" Minerals 14, no. 2: 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020175

APA Style

Kampf, A. R., Möhn, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Désorite, Pb2(Fe3+6Zn)O2(PO4)4(OH)8, a New Phosphate Mineral Isotypic with Jamesite. Minerals, 14(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020175

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop