Next Article in Journal
Practical Methodology for Evaluating Mining Front Stability Based on the Diametrical Core Deformation Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Strategic Qualitative Risk Assessment of Thousands of Legacy Wells within the Area of Review (AoR) of a Potential CO2 Storage Site
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Hydrothermal Alteration of Rhyolite and Andesite at 325 °C and 300 Bar: Implications for a Potential Role of Volcanic Glass in the Fluid Composition in the Okinawa Trough
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trace Element and Sulfur Isotope Signatures of Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (VMS) Mineralization: A Case Study from the Sunnhordland Area in SW Norway

by
Sabina Strmic Palinkas
1,2,*,
Trond Fjellet
2,
Håvard Hallås Stubseid
2,
Xuan Liu
3,
Jorge Enrique Spangenberg
4,
Andrea Čobić
5 and
Rolf Birger Pedersen
2
1
Department of Geosciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Dramsvegen 201, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway
2
Centre for Deep Sea Research, Department of Earth Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
3
Geological Survey of Finland, P.O. Box 96, FI-02151 Espoo, Finland
4
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, Geopolis, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
5
Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Horvatovac 95, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(4), 384; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040384
Submission received: 6 March 2024 / Revised: 2 April 2024 / Accepted: 4 April 2024 / Published: 7 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Submarine Volcanism, Related Hydrothermal Systems and Mineralizations)

Abstract

:
The Sunnhordland area in SW Norway hosts more than 100 known mineral occurrences, mostly of volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) and orogeny Au types. The VMS mineralization is hosted by plutonic, volcanic and sedimentary lithologies of the Lower Ordovician ophiolitic complexes. This study presents new trace element and δ34S data from VMS deposits hosted by gabbro and basalt of the Lykling Ophiolite Complex and organic-rich sediments of the Langevåg Group. The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization exhibits a significant Cu content (1.2 to >10 wt.%), with chalcopyrite and cubanite being the main Cu-bearing minerals. The enrichment of pyrite in Co, Se, and Te and the high Se/As and Se/Tl ratios indicate elevated formation temperatures, while the high Se/S ratio indicates a contribution of magmatic volatiles. The δ34S values of the sulfide phases also support a substantial influx of magmatic sulfur. Chalcopyrite from the Alsvågen VMS mineralization shows significant enrichment in Se, Ag, Zn, Cd and In, while pyrrhotite concentrates Ni and Co. The Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS mineralization consists mainly of pyrite and pyrrhotite. Pyrite is enriched in As, Mn, Pb, Sb, V, and Tl. The δ34S values of sulfides and the Se/S ratio in pyrite suggest that sulfur was predominantly sourced from the host basalt. The Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS mineralization is also dominated by pyrite and pyrrhotite. Pyrite is enriched in As, Mn, Pb, Sb, V and Tl. The δ34S values, which range from −19.7 to −15.7 ‰ VCDT, point to the bacterial reduction of marine sulfate as the main source of sulfur. Trace element characteristics of pyrite, especially the Tl, Sb, Se, As, Co and Ni concentrations, together with their mutual ratios, provide a solid basis for distinguishing gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization from basalt- and sediment-hosted types of VMS mineralization in the study area. The distinctive trace element features of pyrite, in conjunction with its sulfur isotope signature, have been identified as a robust tool for the discrimination of gabbro-, basalt- and sediment-hosted VMS mineralization.

1. Introduction

Volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits have traditionally been mined for Cu, Zn and eventually Pb, with Au and Ag as common by-products. Recently, this type of mineralization has gained attention due to its potential enrichment in numerous technology-critical elements such as Co, Ni, Mn, Cd, In, Sn, Se, Bi, Te, Ga, Ge and Sb (e.g., [1,2,3]). The VMS deposits represent a product of convective hydrothermal circulation within the seafloor, driven by a combination of extensional tectonics and an elevated geothermal gradient (e.g., [4]). This type of mineralization has been found in various ancient and recent geological settings, including mid-ocean ridges, back-arc basins, intra-oceanic arc systems and continental arc rifts (e.g., [5,6,7]). The mineralization is dominated by pyrite and pyrrhotite and has a stratiform character. Depending on its geological setting, VMS mineralization can be hosted by hydrothermally altered ultramafic, mafic or felsic magmatic rocks or by siliciclastic sedimentary sequences (e.g., [5,8,9]).
Mining of VMS deposits in Norway has a tradition of over 450 years. During this time, more than 100 Mt of ore have been mined in 10 major mining districts located along the Upper Allochthon of the Scandinavian Caledonides, an orogenic belt that extends for about 1500 km from the Stavanger region in southern Norway to the Barents Sea region in northern Norway (e.g., [10,11]; Figure 1). The VMSVMS mineralization is predominantly associated with two generations of ophiolite terranes of the Iapetus Ocean realm. The Early Ordovician ophiolites exhibit a range of compositions from MORB, IAT, boninites and calc-alkaline to alkaline basalts, whereas the Late Ordovician ophiolite complexes are characterized by N- to E-MORB compositions [11,12,13].
The Sunnhordland area in SW Norway hosts more than 100 known mineral occurrences, most of them of the VMS and orogeny Au types (Figure 2; [10,15,16]). The VMS mineralization in this area is associated with the Early Ordovician ophiolitic terranes. Depending on their immediate host rock, the deposits can be categorized into three main groups: (1) gabbro-hosted VMS deposits, (2) basalt-hosted VMS deposits, and (3) sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Despite the abundance and diversity of the VMS occurrences in the Sunnhordland region, their mineralogical and geochemical characteristics, as well as the genetic models, have been poorly constrained [10].
This paper presents new data on ore mineralogy, multi-element LA-ICP-MS analyses and sulfur isotope (δ34S) obtained from gabbro-, basalt- and sediment-hosted VMS deposits in the Sunnhordland area, SW Norway (Figure 1). The main objective of the study is to reveal the trace element and stable isotope characteristics of sulfide minerals associated with VMS mineralization hosted by diverse lithologies and thus contribute to the advancement of geochemical exploration methodology.

2. Geological Setting

2.1. Regional Geology

Scandinavian Caledonides (Figure 1), an orogenic belt underlaid by the Fennoscandian shield, document an approximately 900 Ma year-long geological history that began with the breakup of Rodinia [17], which was followed by the opening of the Iapetus Ocean (e.g., [10,11,18]). The closure of the Iapetus Ocean in the Late Cambrian cumulated with the subduction of the Baltica terrains beneath Laurentia in the late Silurian to Early Devonian. During an oblique collision episode, the allochthonous tectonic units were accreted onto the Baltic continent [14,19,20]. The Devonian period is characterized by post-collisional processes associated with extensional tectonics, the formation of basins and extensive sedimentation [14].
The Sunnhordland region is composed of Precambrian basement rocks overlain by the Caledonian allochthonous units. The contact between the basement and the Caledonian lithologies is marked by the low-angle Hardangerfjord Shear Zone [21]. The VMS deposits are exclusively hosted within the Upper Allochthon ([10]; Figure 1), a tectono-stratigraphic unit composed of ophiolites, igneous and island arc complexes and several adjacent sedimentary basins (Figure 2). Based on their age and genetic features, the ophiolite complexes of the Upper Allochthon were divided into two generations: (1) Early Ordovician ophiolites (i.e., the Leka, Løkken, Gullfjellet, Lykling and Karmøy ophiolite complexes, as shown in Figure 2) that formed in an intra-oceanic arc environment, and (2) Late Ordovician ophiolites (i.e., the Solund-Stavfjord and Sulitjelma ophiolite complexes, as shown in Figure 2) that developed in a back-arc setting before the Laurentia-Baltica collision event [22,23,24,25].
Figure 2. Geological map of the Sunnhordland region showing the locations of the investigated VMS deposits (Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization, Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS mineralization and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS mineralization). The map is based on the 1:250,000 geological map of the Norwegian Geological Survey [26].
Figure 2. Geological map of the Sunnhordland region showing the locations of the investigated VMS deposits (Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization, Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS mineralization and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS mineralization). The map is based on the 1:250,000 geological map of the Norwegian Geological Survey [26].
Minerals 14 00384 g002

2.2. Geology of the Study Area

Stratigraphically, the lowermost part of the Bømlo island consists of the Lykling Ophiolite Complex, which is unconformably overlain by immature island arc lithologies of the Geitung Unit (Figure 2; [27]). The Lykling Ophiolite Complex records almost complete oceanic crust succession, including chromite-bearing serpentinites in its deepest part, overlain by layered and isotropic gabbro sequences, sheeted dyke complexes and basaltic pillow lavas [22,27,28]. The geochemical characteristics of its mafic lithologies suggest that the Lykling Ophiolite Complex was formed in a supra-subduction zone [29]. The Geitung Unit is made of dacites, basaltic pillow lavas, hyaloclastites and interbedded sediments [27]. Both the Lykling Ophiolite Complex and the overlying Geitung Unit were intruded by tonalite, trondhjemite and dacitic dykes [28].
The Langevåg Group is exposed along the southern parts of the islands of Bømlo and Stord (Figure 2). This volcano–sedimentary complex consists of six formations with a total thickness of ~1250 m, reflecting the progressive deepening of a marine back-arc basin [28]. The lowermost Krekjebær Formation records subaerial mafic volcanic activity. It is overlain by radiolarian cherts, turbidites, tuffs and possible submarine pyroclastic flows of the Kyrkjetuft Formation. The Vorland Formation and Stavaneset Formation mostly consist of green phyllites and sandstones sporadically intercalated with vesicular greenstones and radiolarian cherts [27,28]. These two units are stratigraphically separated with an over 100 m thick chert-bearing Hesthaugen Formation. The uppermost portion of the Langevåg Group is represented by the Vespestad Formation, which mainly consists of dark shales and quartz-rich turbidites [28].
The Siggjo Complex unconformably overlies the Lykling Ophiolite Complex and the Geitung Unit (Figure 2; [27]). It predominantly consists of basalts and basaltic andesites with a calc-alkaline character [28]. The U/Pb dating of the andesites yielded 473 ± 2 Ma [29].
The northern parts of the islands of Bømlo and Stord are intruded by the Sunnhordland Batholith, an intrusive magmatic body with an area of about 1.000 km2 (Figure 2; [30]). The batholith is composed of a range of mafic to felsic lithologies, including gabbros, diorites, granodiorites and granites. U/Pb dating of zircons indicates the gabbro emplacement at 472 ± 2 Ma [29], while the granites have been dated at 468 ± 3 Ma [31].

2.3. The VMS Mineralization in the Study Area

The Sunnhordland area in SW Norway hosts more than 100 known mineral occurrences, including VMS deposits hosted by plutonic and volcanic lithologies as well as sediments (e.g., [10,15]). The Alsvågen and Lindøya VMS deposits are the largest known VMS occurrences associated with the Lykling Ophiolite Complex (Figure 2). The Alsvågen mineralization is hosted by the gabbroic sequence, while the Lindøya mineralization is hosted by overlying basalts. The Litlabø VMS deposit, on the other hand, is hosted by sedimentary rocks of the Langevåg Group. With over 9 Mt of ore historically mined, Litlabø is known as the largest VMS deposit in the entire Sunnhordland region (Figure 2).
The southern part of the Alsvågen area is dominated by barren layered and isotropic gabbro of the Lykling Ophiolite Complex. Mineralization occurs in the northern part of the Alsvågen area, where the layered gabbro becomes scarcer and is replaced by altering coarse- and micro-gabbroic lithologies. The contact between the coarse- and micro-gabbro is often sharp, indicating a high-level gabbroic zone where micro-gabbroic dykes have intruded coarser-grained isotropic gabbro. A younger generation of east–west orientated basaltic dykes crosscut the Alsvågen area. The entire area was affected by the greenschist facies regional metamorphism during the Caledonian orogeny [32,33]. The Alsvågen region contains four mineralized shear zones trending NW–SE (Figure 3A). While two of these shear zones are partially visible at the surface (Figure 4A), historical mining activities have removed a significant part of the mineralization they host. Mineralization along the shear zones has a massive appearance, mainly characterized by chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite as the predominant sulfide minerals. Away from the shear zones, the sulfide mineralization takes the form of disseminations and veinlets hosted by both coarse- and micro-gabbroic lithologies (Figure 4B; [33]).
The Lindøya area consists mainly of trondhjemite that has intruded into the Geitung Unit and the Lykling Ophiolite Complex (Figure 3). Micro-gabbro and basalt are exposed along the central part of the area, but their extent is still unknown. Younger basaltic dykes crosscut trondhjemite and possibly the micro-gabbro/basaltic lithologies. The main ore body is hosted by basalts. The mineralization, consisting predominantly of pyrite and minor amounts of chalcopyrite, occurs in the form of massive lenses and disseminations (Figure 4C; [33]).
The Litlabø mineralization is hosted by the volcano–sedimentary complex of the Langevåg Group (Figure 3), which documents the deepening of the back-arc basin [28]. The mineralization is embedded in organic-rich black shales (Figure 4D,E). It mostly occurs in the form of bedding-parallel massive sulfide layers predominantly composed of pyrite and pyrrhotite. Locally, pyrite-rich veinlets that crosscut the primary bedding were found (Figure 4F; [33]).

3. Samples and Methods

3.1. Samples

The sampling campaign in the Sunnhordland area (Figure 2) was carried out in the summer of 2020 as a part of TF’s Master project. In total, over 40 samples of barren and mineralized host rocks and sulfide mineralization were collected, but the results presented in this paper are from 14 samples of sulfide mineralization (Figure 3). The representative samples were prepared as polished thick sections for petrography and in situ trace element analyses. The samples selected for ore grade analyses were pulverized in an agate mill. The mineral grains selected for sulfur isotope analyses were micro-drilled.

3.2. Analytical Methods

Petrographic studies were carried out on polished thick sections using reflected light microscopy. Textural features and semi-quantitative analyses of the mineralized samples were studied on carbon-coated polished sections using a Zeiss supra 55VP Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) equipped with an Energy-Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer at the University of Bergen. EDX analyses were performed with a Thermo Noran detector at a working distance of 8.5 mm, an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and an aperture of 60 µm.
The ore grade was determined at Bureau Veritas Minerals, Canada. The multi-acid digestion and ICP-ES method (code MA370) was combined with the Fire Assay Au method (code FA330-Au). A total of 24 elements were analyzed. Their detection limits are listed in Table 1.
Laser ablation single collector ICP-MS analyses of sulfide minerals were performed at the Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), using a Nu AttoM SC-ICPMS (Nu Instruments Ltd., Wrexham, UK) and Excite193nm ArF laser-ablation system (Photon Machines, San Diego, USA). The laser was operated at a pulse frequency of 5 Hz and a pulse energy of 5 mJ at 40% attenuation with a spot size of 40 µm. Each analysis began with a 20 s baseline measurement followed by switching on the laser for 40 s for signal acquisition. Analyses were performed using time-resolved analysis (TRA) with continuous data acquisition for each set of points (generally following the scheme of primary standard, quality control standard, 10–15 unknowns). Measurements were performed at low resolution (M/∆M = 300) in fast-scanning mode. The synthetic pressed nanopellet sulfide standard UQAC FeS-1 was used for external standardization, and the nanopellet sulfide standards FeS-5 and FeS-6 were used as quality controls. Data reduction was performed using GLITTER TM software [34], which allows for baseline subtraction, the integration of the signal over a selected time resolve area and quantification using known concentrations of the external and internal standards. The isotope 57Fe was used as the internal standard, assuming a stoichiometric composition.
Sulfur isotope analyses were carried out at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland, using elemental analysis and isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA/IRMS). The EA/IRMS system consisted of a Carlo Erba 1108 elemental analyzer coupled with a continuous helium flow interface to a Thermo Fisher Delta V isotope ratio mass spectrometer [35]. The samples were combusted at 1030 °C in a single oxidation–reduction quartz tube filled with oxidizing (tungsten trioxide) and reducing (elemental copper) agents. The measured values of sulfur isotopes are given in the δ-notation and relative to the Vienna Cañon Diablo Troilite (VCDT) standard. The laboratory assured that the reproducibility with replicate analysis with given standards (natural pyrite –6.72 ‰, synthetic mercury sulfide, +15.82 ‰, barium sulfate, +12.73 ‰ δ34S; [35]) is better than 0.2‰.

4. Results

4.1. Petrography of Host Rock and Ore Mineralization

4.1.1. The Alsvågen Gabbro-Hosted VMS Mineralization

VMS mineralization at Alsvågen is hosted by the gabbro of the Lykling Ophiolite Complex (Figure 3A). Barren layered gabbro consists predominantly of amphiboles, saussurite and chlorites (Figure 5A,B), indicating a regional metamorphic overprint. The mineral composition of slightly mineralized isotropic gabbro is also characterized by abundant amphiboles and chlorites, whereas plagioclase shows only weak saussuritization (Figure 5C,D). Minor amounts of epidote were also observed (Figure 6A). The abundant occurrence of quartz indicates that the mineralization event was associated with extensive silicification. The gabbro in the immediate vicinity of the mineralized shear zones is composed of amphiboles, chlorites, weakly saussuritized plagioclase and quartz and locally records epidotization (Figure 5E,F).
Massive sulfide mineralization hosted by the shear zones consists mainly of pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite in association with variable amounts of pyrite and cubanite and minor amounts of sphalerite (Figure 6B,C). The textural features indicate post-ore deformation processes that led to brittle fragmentation of pyrite and ductile deformation of other sulfide phases (Figure 6B,C). Outside the shear zones, the mineralization occurs in the form of veinlets and dissemination. In both cases, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite predominate, often accompanied by minor amounts of titanite (Figure 6D).

4.1.2. The Lindøya Basalt-Hosted VMS Mineralization

The VMS mineralization at Lindøya is hosted by basalts of the Lykling Ophiolite Complex (Figure 3B). Both barren and mineralized basalts consist of amphiboles, chlorites and weakly saussuritized plagioclases (Figure 7A). Lenses of massive sulfide mineralization show an intercalation of sulfide and silica layers. The sulfide layers are predominantly composed of pyrite and pyrrhotite, associated with minor amounts of chalcopyrite, magnetite and arsenopyrite (Figure 7B,C). Locally, younger generations of sulfides, mostly pyrite, crosscut the sulfide-silica layers. Disseminated mineralization is characterized by pyrite, chalcopyrite and minor amounts of sphalerite, often accompanied by extensive chloritization (Figure 7D).

4.1.3. The Litlabø Sediment-Hosted VMS Mineralization

The VMS mineralization at Litlabø is associated with a volcano–sedimentary complex composed of organic-rich black shales, layered siliciclastic sedimentary rocks, cherts and greenstones (Figure 3C). The intermediate host rock is finely laminated organic-rich black shale (Figure 4D,E).
Massive sulfide mineralization occurs in the form of bedding-parallel layers and can be subdivided into pyrite-rich mineralization and pyrrhotite-rich mineralization based on its mineral composition. The pyrite-rich sulfide mineralization consists of intercalated rhythmically altering layers composed of fine-grained porous pyrite (Py1) with layers composed of massive pyrite (Py2; Figure 8A). Only traces of pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite were observed. The mineralized layers are often crosscut by quartz veinlets a few millimeters thick. The pyrrhotite-rich sulfide mineralization consists of at least two generations of pyrrhotite. Early pyrrhotite is often associated with minor amounts of arsenopyrite and occurs in the form of fine-grained lamellas. These lamellas were subjected to extensive brecciation and afterwards cemented with the late generation of pyrrhotite (Figure 8B).

4.2. Ore Grade Analysis

The results of the ore grade analysis of representative massive sulfide samples collected from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits as part of this study are shown in Table 1. Ore grade data from previous studies in the area are summarized in Table 2 [37].
The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted mineralization is characterized by a high Cu content, ranging from 1.2 to >10 wt.%. The mineralization is depleted in all other economically important elements. The Cu/(Zn+Pb) and Fe/base metal ratios range between ~40 and 300 and ~1.5 and 8, respectively (Table 1 and Table 2; Figure 9). In contrast, the Lindøya basalt-hosted mineralization contains only 0.006 to 0.02 wt.% Cu. All other economically important elements are also depleted. The Cu/(Zn+Pb) ratio is <1, while the Fe/base metal ratio varies between ~400 and 1000 (Table 1 and Table 2; Figure 9). The Litlabø-sediment hosted VMS mineralization contains between 0.02 and 0.11 wt.% Cu. The pyrrhotite-rich sample is enriched in Au, Ni and Co compared to the pyrite-rich sample. In general, the Litlabø mineralization is characterized by a low Cu/(Zn+Pb) ratio (<1.4) and a high Fe/base metal ratio (~200 to 500; Table 1 and Table 2; Figure 9).

4.3. Trace Element Composition of Sulfide Minerals

The trace element composition of selected sulfide phases from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits is listed in Appendix A and illustrated in Figure 10.
Sulfide minerals (pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite) from the gabbro-hosted Alsvågen VMS mineralization are enriched in Se and Te and depleted in Ti, V, Mn, As, Sb, Tl and Pb compared to pyrite from the basalt-hosted Lindøya and the sediment-hosted Litlabø VMS deposits (Figure 10). Sulfides of the Alsvågen VMS mineralization are also characterized by high Se/As, Se/Tl and Se/S ratios compared to sulfides from the latter two deposits (Appendix A). The Alsvågen pyrrhotite is enriched in Co (8.5–4651.0 ppm, with a mean value of 1251.5 ppm) and Ni (0.9–680.9 ppm, with a mean value of 375.7 ppm). In contrast, chalcopyrite from Alsvågen is enriched in Zn (442.5–1062.2 ppm, with a mean value of 643.6 ppm), Ag (7.0–31.0 ppm, with a mean value of 13.7 ppm), Cd (3.3–15.9 ppm, with a mean value of 8.3 ppm) and In (2.4–23.2 ppm, with a mean value of 8.2 ppm).
The comparison of the trace element composition of the pyrite from the investigated VMS deposits revealed that the gabbro-hosted pyrite is depleted in most of the analyzed elements, with the exception of Co, Se, Te, In and Bi (Figure 10). The gabbro-hosted pyrite is characterized by Se/As and Se/Tl ratios in the ranges between ~0.6 and 285 (a mean value of 82) and >5*106, respectively. Its Se/S*106 value spans between 131 and 1650 (a mean value of 672; Appendix A). The basalt-hosted pyrite exhibits elevated contents of As (450.2–1907.7 ppm, with a mean value of 827.9 ppm), Cu (0.5–257.9 ppm, with a mean value of 123.1 ppm), Mn (0.5–170.5 ppm; 73.6 ppm), Pb (0.1–135.0 ppm, with a mean value of 61.8 ppm), Ti (5.4–200.9 ppm, with a mean value of 61.4 ppm), Sb (<56.9 ppm, with a mean value of 24.3 ppm), Hg (<14.7 ppm, with a mean value of 6.9 ppm) and Tl (<3.8 ppm, with a mean value of 1.6 ppm). The sediment-hosted pyrite shows an enrichment in As (Py1: 423.2–1104.2 ppm, with a mean value of 769.9 ppm; Py2: 553.0–919.0 ppm, with a mean value of 713.0 ppm), Pb (Py1: 3.5–64.3 ppm, with a mean value of 27.3 ppm; Py2: 4.8–29.3 ppm, with a mean value of 14.3 ppm); Mo (Py1: 1.6–30.6 ppm, with a mean value of 8.6 ppm; Py2: 1.3–17.6 ppm, with a mean value of 7.9 ppm), Ge (Py1: 0.8–1.7 ppm, with a mean value of 1.1 ppm; Py2: 1.1–1.6 ppm, with a mean value of 1.4 ppm) and Tl (Py1: 0.1–1.0 ppm, with a mean value of 0.5 ppm; Py2: 0.1–0.9 ppm, with a mean value of 0.4 ppm).

4.4. Sulfur Isotopes

The sulfur isotope composition of sulfide phases from the VMS deposits Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø is shown in Table 3 and graphically presented in Figure 11. Sulfide minerals from the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit show a range of δ34S values between 0.4 and 3.9 ‰ VCDT (n = 12, with a mean value of 1.6 ‰, as shown in Table 3). The sulfides from the Lindøya basalt-hosted are characterized by δ34S values between 4.9 and 5.9 ‰ VCDT (n = 5, with a mean value of 5.4 ‰, as shown in Table 3). The Litlabø sediment-hosted sulfides exhibit a significant depletion of 34S and show δ34S values between −19.7 and −15.7 ‰ VCDT (n = 4; mean = −17.6 ‰; Table 3).

5. Discussion

Although all of the VMS deposits indicate that they are products of hydrothermal activity within the seafloor, they can be a source of different commodities (e.g., Cu-Zn-rich, Cu-Zn-Pb-rich, Cu-Zn-Au-rich, Cu-Zn-Co-rich, etc.; [5]) and may have variable economic potential depending on their initial geological setting and the local physicochemical conditions during their formation as well as during the tectonic transport and obduction of the seafloor onto the continental crust (e.g., [38]). In addition, deeper parts of ophiolite sequences may host massive sulfides related to primary magmatic processes [39,40,41,42].
Recent developments in microbeam analytical methods, including the in situ LA-ICP-MS technique, enable the determination of trace element distributions in individual mineral phases, including sulfides (e.g., [43,44,45,46]). The trace element content of pyrite, the most common sulfide mineral in various types of mineral deposits, is considered to be an important source of information on the depositional mechanisms of sulfide in both magmatic and hydrothermal deposits (e.g., [47,48,49,50]). Several studies on VMS deposits suggest that the trace element content of pyrite can also be used as a vector in the exploration of this type of deposit (e.g., [51,52,53]).
In this study, we selected three massive sulfide deposits from the Sunnhordland region in SW Norway hosted by different lithologies to test the effectiveness of trace element and δ34S signatures of sulfide phases in distinguishing VMS deposits in different geological settings. The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS deposit is characterized by a high Cu grade (1.2 to >10 wt.%) and an abundance of chalcopyrite and cubanite associated with pyrrhotite, pyrite and sphalerite (Figure 6; Table 1 and Table 2). In contrast, the Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS deposit is characterized by a high Fe/base metal ratio and a Cu grade ranging between 0.006 and 0.02 wt.% (Figure 7; Table 1 and Table 2). The main sulfide phases are pyrite and pyrrhotite. The Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposit also has a low Cu grade (0.02–0.11 wt.%), with pyrite and pyrrhotite being the main sulfide minerals. The pyrrhotite-rich mineralization is slightly enriched in Au, Ni and Co (Figure 8; Table 1 and Table 2).
Pyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS deposit shows a considerable enrichment in Co, Se, Te, In and Bi compared to pyrite from the Lindøya basalt-hosted and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. In contrast, pyrite from the latter two deposits is enriched in V, Mn, As, Sb, Tl and Pb (Appendix A; Figure 10). Previous studies on the trace element characteristics of pyrite from VMS deposits indicated a significant negative correlation between As and Se in hydrothermal pyrite, presumably controlled by their competition for S site and fluid temperature [51]. The Se/Tl ratio has also been proposed as an indicator of fluid temperature and can be used directly to distinguish between mineralized and barren zones in VMS prospects [51,54]. The high Se/As and Se/Tl ratios recorded from the gabbro-hosted pyrite indicate a relatively high formation temperature for the Alsvågen mineralization and clearly distinguish the high-grade gabbro-hosted mineralization from the low-grade basalt-hosted and sediment-hosted types of VMS mineralization. The high Se/S ratio in the Alsvågen pyrite (Se/S*106 = 131–1650, with a the mean value of 672) indicates an influx of magmatic volatiles (e.g., [55,56,57]). The Co/Sb vs. Se/As ratios support the magmatic affinity of the Alsvågen mineralization (Figure 12; [45,58]).
Pyrite from the Lindøya basalt-hosted and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits overlap considerably in terms of trace element composition (Figure 10); therefore, the binary trace element plots cannot be used for their discrimination (Figure 13). In contrast to pyrite from the gabbro-hosted Alsvågen mineralization, pyrite from Lindøya and Litlabø reflects a hydrothermal affinity in the Co/Sb vs. Se/As diagram (Figure 12A; [45,58]).
Chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite from the Alsvågen VMS deposit were also analyzed for their trace element content. The recorded enrichments of chalcopyrite in Se, Ag, Zn, Cd and In and of pyrrhotite in Ni and Co (Appendix A; Figure 10) are probably controlled by the partition of trace elements between coprecipitating sulfide phases (e.g., [59,60,61,62]). The Zn vs. Cd content of chalcopyrite reflects that the Alsvågen mineralization has been subjected to post-formation recrystallization processes at elevated temperatures (Figure 12B; [45]).
Sulfide mineralization from the studied VMS deposits in the Sunnhordland region, SW Norway, shows a distinct δ34S signature (Table 3, Figure 11). The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted mineralization is characterized by δ34S values between 0.4 and 3.9 ‰ VCDT (n = 12, with a mean value of 1.6 ‰, as shown in Table 3), indicating a magmatic contribution of sulfur (e.g., [63]).
The Lindøya basalt-hosted mineralization shows δ34S values ranging between 4.9 and 5.9 ‰ VCDT (n = 5, with a mean value of 5.4 ‰, as shown in Table 3). These values are similar to the sulfur isotope composition of sulfide minerals from the basalt-hosted VMS deposits elsewhere (e.g., [64,65,66]). Pyrite with Se/S*106 values of <11.5 reflects a negligible contribution from magmatic volatiles, additionally supporting the notion that sulfur at Lindøya was predominantly leached from the host basalt.
The Litlabø sediment-hosted mineralization with δ34S values between −19.7 and −15.7 ‰ VCDT (n = 4; mean = −17.6 ‰; Table 3) reflects the bacterial reduction of marine sulfate as the main source of sulfur in this deposit (e.g., [67,68]). The low Se/S*106 values measured in pyrite (<14.9) are consistent with a non-magmatic source of sulfur.
The distinctive sulfur isotope signature of pyrite from the three examined types of VMS deposits can be used to distinguish gabbro-, basalt- and sediment-hosted VMS deposits. As illustrated in Figure 14, the combination of characteristic δ34S ranges with trace element attributes provides a robust tool for the differentiation of pyrite from VMS deposits hosted by different lithologies. Therefore, the proposed binary δ34S trace element plots have a strong potential for use in discriminating provenances of individual pyrite grains extracted from stream sediments, soils or till material.

6. Conclusions

Despite their abundance and diversity, the VMS deposits of the Sunnhordland region, SW Norway, have not been subjected to previous mineralogical, geochemical or stable isotope investigations. This study brings an overview of mineral characteristics of the VMS deposits hosted by different lithologies, including gabbro and basalt of the Lykling Ophiolite Complex, as well as organic-rich sediments of the Langevåg Group, coupled with new trace element and δ34S data obtained sulfide mineral phases.
The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization (1.2 to >10 wt.% of Cu) consists of chalcopyrite and cubanite in association with pyrrhotite, pyrite and sphalerite. Pyrite has a significant enrichment of Co (7–4867 ppm, with an average value of 1105 ppm), Se (80–723 ppm, with an average value of 345 ppm) and Te (<36 ppm, with an average value of 12 ppm). The high Se/As and Se/Tl ratios reflect a relatively high formation temperature for Alsvågen mineralization, while the high Se/S ratio (Se/S*106 = 131–1650, with a mean value of 672) suggests a contribution from magmatic volatiles. The δ34S values of sulfide phases that range within the interval from 0.4 to 3.9 ‰ VCDT (n = 12, with a mean value of 1.6 ‰) additionally support a significant influx of magmatic sulfur. Chalcopyrite from the Alsvågen VMS shows enrichment of Se, Ag, Zn, Cd and In, while pyrrhotite concentrates Ni and Co.
The Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS mineralization (0.006 to 0.02 wt.% of Cu) consists predominantly of pyrite and pyrrhotite. Pyrite is enriched in As (450–1908 ppm, with an average value of 828 ppm), Mn (0.03–171 ppm, with an average value of 74 ppm), Pb (0.07–135 ppm, with an average value of 62 ppm), Sb (0.03–57 ppm, with an average value of 24 ppm), V (0.5–48 ppm, with an average value of 16 ppm) and Tl (0.02–4 ppm, with an average value of 2 ppm). The δ34S values of sulfides range between 4.9 and 5.9 ‰ VCDT (n = 5, with a mean value of 5.4 ‰). These values, together with the Se/S ratio in pyrite (Se/S*106 values <11.5), suggest that the sulfur at Lindøya was predominantly leached from the host basalt.
The Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS mineralization (0.02–0.11 wt.% of Cu) also consists predominantly of pyrite and pyrrhotite. Pyrite is enriched in the same suite of elements as pyrite from Lindøya (As (423–1104 ppm, with an average value of 739 ppm), Mn (5–82 ppm, with an average value of 24 ppm), Pb (4–64 ppm, with an average value of 20 ppm), V (1–52 ppm, with an average value of 14 ppm), Sb (0.7–19 ppm, with an average value of 6 ppm) and Tl (0.1–1 ppm, with an average value og 0.5 ppm). The Litlabø sediment-hosted mineralization has δ34S values between –19.7 and –15.7‰ VCDT, indicating that the bacterial reduction of marine sulfate is the main source of sulfur in this deposit. The low Se/S*106 values measured in pyrite (<14.9) support a non-magmatic source of sulfur.
Trace element characteristics, in particular Tl, Sb, Se, As, Co and Ni concentrations and their mutual ratios have been identified as an efficient tool to distinguish the gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization from the basalt- and sediment-hosted types of VMS mineralization. The trace element features of pyrite, coupled with its distinctive sulfur isotope signature, represent a novel and robust tool for distinguishing gabbro-, basalt- and sediment-hosted VMS mineralization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.P., R.B.P., H.H.S. and T.F.; methodology, T.F., X.L. and J.E.S.; validation, S.S.P., R.B.P., H.H.S. and T.F.; formal analysis, T.F., X.L., J.E.S. and A.Č.; resources, S.S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.P. and T.F.; writing—all authors; visualization, T.F., A.Č. and S.S.P.; supervision, S.S.P., R.B.P. and H.H.S.; project administration, S.S.P.; funding acquisition, S.S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), a body of the European Union, under the Horizon 2020, the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, grant number 19217 MinExTarget (Enhanced Use of Heavy Mineral Chemistry in Exploration Targeting).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The sampling campaign and data collection were carried out as a part of TF’s Master project in 2020 and 2021. This study was supported by the MinExTarget (Enhanced Use of Heavy Mineral Chemistry in Exploration Targeting) project and received funding from the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), a body of the European Union, under the Horizon 2020, the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their comments and the Guest editor Gabriella B. Kiss for handling this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table A1. Trace element composition (LA-ICP-MS) of sulfide phases from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits, SW Norway.
Table A1. Trace element composition (LA-ICP-MS) of sulfide phases from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits, SW Norway.
SampleMineralSTiVCrMnCoNiCuZnGeAsSeMoAgCdInSbTeAuHgTlPbBi
(ppm)
The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS deposit
20ALS4FPyrrhotite425,2963.690.017<0.1950.882097.25669.640.113<0.171.162.63349.182.1900.5840.0820.00630.1330.964<0.0010.3200.0091.2360.149
20ALS4FPyrrhotite422,7773.170.1142.432.172276.11674.511.6710.930.153.15335.351.6790.7300.101<0.00012.6301.519<0.0010.2100.0122.0700.260
20ALS4FPyrrhotite417,1033.82<0.0071.582.642032.58680.850.1321.78<0.113.53331.611.6360.3780.073<0.00100.3400.730<0.0010.410<0.000.2680.046
20ALS4FPyrrhotite468,2753.63<0.0080.640.801662.66648.78<0.115<0.230.292.02389.421.9100.154<0.0250.00490.0131.217<0.0010.450<0.0020.1330.031
20ALS4FPyrrhotite442,5204.600.049<0.2250.851484.45620.39<0.094<0.25<0.142.41370.531.8900.823<0.020<0.00160.7801.630<0.0010.260<0.0010.9810.300
20ALS4FPyrrhotite458,5403.99<0.0073.280.791617.11657.11<0.1020.811.313.58367.531.9700.577<0.0220.00260.3491.156<0.0010.650<0.0020.4040.125
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite398,1444.470.0462.340.998.45376.400.487<0.200.161.97255.791.2300.078<0.0180.0072<0.0010.917<0.0010.7500.0040.007<0.0018
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite407,3532.92<0.0081.971.1010.15431.490.3221.591.232.91243.672.1200.0250.0420.0156<0.0011.0550.0040.6700.003<0.0020.026
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite416,2285.22<0.0062.490.8510.37308.50<0.087<0.211.002.60261.341.9202.090<0.0250.0023<0.0041.840<0.0011.310<0.0014.4700.550
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite786,3586.710.028<0.130.653616.340.870.477<0.150.847.07128.441.5120.0110.0340.0099<0.001<0.021<0.001<0.050<0.001<0.001<0.00
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite819,6329.380.158<0.140.953765.964.641.223<0.161.020.66138.481.8100.0190.053<0.0005<0.0030.510<0.0010.200<0.0010.0100.560
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite874,9638.430.013<0.120.684650.965.640.2551.150.611.05169.812.140<0.0040.089<0.0001<0.001<0.020<0.0010.2700.005<0.001<0.00
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite432,8642.92<0.0090.600.659.98405.211.092<0.240.662.79287.391.9300.675<0.023<0.00180.0421.820<0.0010.8100.0041.1350.530
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite410,5572.080.0412.661.269.46537.510.4250.431.862.72260.941.4700.033<0.01390.0016<0.0011.730<0.0010.4800.0030.0150.005
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite412,9672.060.0331.950.8810.19266.440.2040.490.922.94246.451.5700.455<0.01290.0021<0.0011.039<0.0010.460<0.0010.2570.170
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite417,8853.05<0.0054.560.8110.14361.240.5481.161.221.87243.421.6801.430<0.015<0.0001<0.0010.938<0.0011.2900.0386.6400.390
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite452,9054.11<0.0102.460.5910.42441.110.464<0.310.752.54244.581.7700.4250.075<0.0023<0.0011.420<0.0010.810<0.0010.3170.210
20ALS3S1Pyrrhotite445,2473.360.0290.890.919.83402.160.516<0.251.242.77247.571.5400.8930.0250.00240.0090.944<0.0011.4800.0030.4580.150
20ALS4EPyrrhotite347,5744.19<0.010<0.281.431304.18350.31<0.0650.701.382.51561.48<0.0110.8730.1960.00890.0461.400<0.0010.500<0.0013.7800.118
20ALS4EPyrrhotite337,4463.27<0.0061.810.791245.77333.940.0750.540.801.07698.23<0.0120.7530.0300.00200.0081.180<0.0010.4800.0085.1600.227
20ALS4EPyrrhotite337,2653.670.009<0.260.571334.37301.140.5231.460.791.41609.65<0.0131.5600.0290.00340.0352.130<0.0010.8400.0078.6601.040
20ALS4EPyrrhotite341,7993.870.0533.030.521337.99415.51<0.056<0.230.781.22441.960.0721.6400.015<0.0001<0.0010.830<0.001<0.0830.0081.4800.125
20ALS4EPyrrhotite324,2965.230.074<0.270.981071.13397.18<0.076<0.230.591.22571.34<0.0080.006<0.01240.0032<0.0010.880<0.0011.430<0.001<0.001<0.00
20ALS4EPyrrhotite347,0784.450.0153.581.111372.66227.160.762<0.250.571.30874.34<0.0110.343<0.016<0.00090.44018.920<0.0010.430<0.00129.9600.750
20ALS4EPyrrhotite351,4983.850.022<0.300.761290.67191.360.252<0.261.291.60793.44<0.0170.035<0.00<0.00120.0081.200<0.0010.200<0.002<0.0010.002
20ALS4EPyrrhotite330,7214.120.0591.270.781203.75361.850.480<0.231.331.54500.18<0.0130.0320.039<0.00080.0210.730<0.0010.4600.0040.0090.003
20ALS4EPyrrhotite322,4353.90<0.0085.090.921142.70345.13<0.079<0.240.821.74706.500.0440.0640.021<0.0009<0.0031.500<0.0010.390<0.0020.3430.012
20ALS4EPyrrhotite334,9755.591.2303.033.401291.24396.960.3340.480.420.85478.60<0.0140.2370.0600.0044<0.0011.200<0.0010.6100.0081.9500.032
20ALS4EChalcopyrite304,6093.99<0.0080.260.079.935.43251,939.440487.701.240.75639.29<0.0098.4904.9302.46000.2268.550<0.0010.8200.0252.5400.108
20ALS4EChalcopyrite297,7394.630.0102.450.597.712.92237,609.660788.170.600.68579.530.0298.8009.3802.58000.32010.060<0.0010.5600.0093.1500.234
20ALS4EChalcopyrite296,9103.750.0522.460.575.003.33263,605.380442.480.431.29537.980.1178.5103.3102.38000.41012.220<0.0010.6200.0191.9600.120
20ALS4EChalcopyrite296,7953.060.0573.330.263.213.05256,279.840651.450.361.32493.13<0.0087.2405.8902.65000.26012.500<0.0010.170<0.0010.8100.092
20ALS4EChalcopyrite312,4684.450.0472.410.457.694.77280,534.630618.090.960.66836.320.0727.3807.1902.78000.34013.6100.004<0.0840.0050.8500.104
20ALS4EChalcopyrite319,6624.29<0.0070.600.664.744.27264,177.060720.110.630.45769.43<0.0107.9108.3902.74000.18911.170<0.0010.970<0.0010.7550.095
20ALS4EChalcopyrite310,9584.090.029<0.230.725.604.25260,726.250809.550.910.51676.36<0.0137.3608.0002.79000.34014.980<0.0010.380<0.0010.9400.093
20ALS4EChalcopyrite296,7614.37<0.0071.291.564.543.84253,637.610542.390.301.34651.840.0227.3506.6902.59000.34013.020<0.00190.7300.0111.7500.105
20ALS4EChalcopyrite301,7852.51<0.0071.180.606.294.16254,776.270644.740.130.96655.89<0.0126.9707.1502.92000.16610.690<0.0010.830<0.0011.1400.095
20ALS4EChalcopyrite305,9093.600.0131.870.627.104.48258,245.7701049.001.210.80646.760.03615.3909.2802.76000.41017.650<0.0010.8100.00511.6300.259
20ALS3S1Chalcopyrite410,3964.190.0372.070.100.0514.17330,386.130520.620.892.10280.240.71821.0208.93023.20000.31012.810<0.0010.5300.0041.1180.230
20ALS3S1Chalcopyrite393,3383.190.0310.710.680.1014.78311,331.380649.03<0.172.19259.540.62721.2209.93023.22000.34015.260<0.0011.620<0.0011.0430.260
20ALS3S1Chalcopyrite418,7225.01<0.0082.281.080.1013.07328,668.000503.120.232.95267.210.85719.35010.38022.98000.51018.920<0.0010.660<0.0010.4280.120
20ALS3S1Chalcopyrite407,35736.372.85018.369.710.1316.07315,585.4401062.200.911.31278.470.49522.34015.93020.08000.31813.750<0.0011.0000.0121.5300.300
20ALS3S1Chalcopyrite383,2883.15<0.0061.090.710.0716.53319,104.090634.990.892.29255.810.68119.94011.30018.69000.41019.210<0.0010.900<0.0020.7420.210
20ALS3S1Chalcopyrite381,8773.470.0361.640.580.0512.17325,434.590551.32<0.131.93264.560.83431.00011.67018.75000.38015.240<0.0010.2300.0071.9000.290
20ALS4FChalcopyrite412,4343.59<0.0081.520.767.2016.56322,072.470674.34<0.131.66425.090.50815.8008.5703.20000.28013.360<0.0011.250<0.0011.1370.410
20ALS4FChalcopyrite375,7283.42<0.0061.510.657.1817.65305,306.130512.15<0.102.23367.450.74014.3706.0303.03000.31213.700<0.0011.3600.0040.5600.260
20ALS4FChalcopyrite422,6222.400.0662.230.196.9517.95321,485.440539.140.352.73398.630.64312.4707.2203.76000.45019.830<0.0011.060<0.0010.9480.680
20ALS4FChalcopyrite423,4743.25<0.0071.490.5211.6619.62335,244.590575.541.591.70408.710.78012.8207.5403.87000.51018.5600.0041.0100.0031.3271.340
20ALS4FChalcopyrite429,3183.860.0122.510.366.6519.36312,942.530538.850.941.78433.690.69212.0507.2503.89000.50018.800<0.0011.1900.0050.7692.720
20ALS4FPyrite373,9182.400.0122.440.666.9717.298.110439.640.712.57352.490.68714.2505.2603.01000.27510.740<0.0010.6400.0050.7520.200
20ALS4FPyrite598,6864.920.027<0.100.52464.264.423.770<0.090.8451.42617.471.2930.044<0.00650.00072.22017.120<0.0010.290<0.0011.6801.440
20ALS4FPyrite627,5696.310.041<0.110.59330.712.8149.51056.130.51151.43723.192.2000.5090.5300.02461.70036.3800.0060.730<0.0011.2340.670
20ALS4FPyrite546,4165.190.005<0.100.47188.011.431.5150.660.71239.18544.391.4730.044<0.008<0.00051.02025.5900.0040.250<0.0010.6580.420
20ALS4FPyrite560,0385.55<0.003<0.090.4317.151.630.357<0.100.811.66264.711.7300.002<0.0056<0.00010.0731.199<0.001<0.030.0020.1180.050
20ALS3S1Pyrite655,9135.97<0.004<0.110.444866.864.910.4460.621.25257.17156.211.5200.0240.014<0.0007<0.002<0.016<0.0010.0740.003<0.001<0.001
20ALS3S1Pyrite608,4115.620.016<0.1080.57123.6120.470.324<0.101.11104.22159.121.363<0.003<0.014<0.00010.0050.175<0.0010.530<0.001<0.0010.001
20ALS3S1Pyrite568,9965.560.039<0.110.623302.342.410.625<0.100.860.6079.761.440<0.005<0.0110.00370.0881.800<0.0010.080<0.0010.0761.980
20ALS4EPyrite174,2972.350.0211.330.44645.50216.370.273<0.120.360.73208.740.0500.0360.0740.00160.0150.486<0.001<0.05<0.0010.1450.003
The Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS deposit
20LIND4BPyrite419,1605.950.203<0.083.521.5720.111.750<0.070.46729.49<0.37<0.006<0.001<0.0030.00350.029<0.008<0.0010.1300.0230.109<0.001
20LIND4BPyrite402,1216.341.630<0.0921.660.1417.2814.6601.690.731907.67<0.400.0150.0180.0420.00260.310<0.0100.0020.2300.2670.4500.001
20LIND4BPyrite386,8826.921.320<0.0810.400.033.830.5140.120.73655.354.660.0580.005<0.005<0.00030.030<0.007<0.0010.2000.0150.071<0.001
20LIND4BPyrite374,520104.4923.7704.73169.448.4832.73238.42025.221.21783.17<0.4812.7301.6700.5300.010550.4600.2490.01612.9603.310120.1600.151
20LIND4BPyrite393,78191.8842.5506.64139.638.5136.14241.46028.711.00786.08<0.5112.9401.6200.2400.010851.4200.2640.01913.6303.310125.2000.157
20LIND4BPyrite425,634200.8947.96010.31150.519.4834.98252.11028.030.83891.97<0.6512.9501.8100.5200.009756.900<0.0170.01814.7103.750135.0200.169
20LIND4BPyrite431,08113.404.000<0.09519.427.0315.0925.24011,692.871.13854.40<0.454.8300.19824.8900.34101.1600.015<0.0016.7100.4802.6700.002
20LIND4BPyrite450,3168.011.6500.6812.6310.7118.6549.6803082.570.84839.240.8911.7200.1119.0000.13502.630<0.0100.0022.4000.2325.9400.006
20LIND4BPyrite418,0355.750.333<0.084.344.3715.188.230542.400.74563.45<0.390.1890.0282.1500.01901.020<0.009<0.0010.6700.0732.810<0.001
20LIND4BPyrite396,14083.1227.3106.90124.1610.4326.44220.97023.850.59799.63<0.5115.4201.5400.3900.001645.9400.0760.01911.9502.740126.9000.181
20LIND4BPyrite379,95179.5922.5408.0482.4510.1027.48200.21022.480.90719.34<0.5014.2801.2800.3700.003740.5100.2740.0229.9502.330104.1100.180
20LIND4BPyrite418,00260.8530.7608.18124.8410.7628.21257.94024.531.18840.28<0.5415.7301.6400.4700.001347.3800.2530.01712.7402.660131.1600.220
20LIND4BPyrite429,2175.430.0040.240.490.1339.955.3001.970.94450.16<0.38<0.0070.0180.012<0.00040.2500.048<0.0010.0570.1470.540<0.001
20LIND4BPyrite410,4366.100.024<0.090.470.051.667.850<0.070.951173.57<0.43<0.0060.0200.0320.00240.3100.041<0.0010.1500.0900.446<0.001
20LIND4BPyrite395,0008.550.3800.410.692.2314.251.200<0.070.79646.761.630.081<0.0010.054<0.00040.0550.099<0.0010.3400.0720.1560.001
20LIND4BPyrite367,11694.7226.7505.51140.709.4739.07214.42028.096.06771.31<0.4812.5901.4600.2700.012242.2100.2010.03011.5803.170104.7900.113
20LIND4BPyrite378,458194.4134.0705.37148.297.0338.02230.05023.681.02713.201.489.4001.6100.4200.007645.3300.1370.03812.3803.100121.0400.158
20LIND4BPyrite417,445128.7523.6304.40170.528.3038.88245.30027.980.60776.902.817.6501.8900.3400.013051.6700.2050.02814.5103.470131.3500.167
The Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposit
19LIT2Pyrite-1602,6877.901.340<0.1016.871.8513.883.34015.431.74643.883.532.1900.8020.160<0.00065.0600.1100.0570.3200.12618.5300.130
19LIT2Pyrite-1537,31610.6811.8508.6329.831.137.411.2902.120.91423.216.222.6600.090<0.014<0.00090.9300.093<0.0010.4200.1013.5300.006
19LIT2Pyrite-1546,07078.3313.1503.9126.782.1613.341.8803.871.06739.966.281.6300.638<0.0110.01063.5400.057<0.0010.2200.97012.4400.084
19LIT2Pyrite-1542,97377.9443.4304.9621.509.1388.8718.12046.571.121104.23<0.6830.5601.2900.5700.030418.6700.2620.0220.5500.94064.2800.280
19LIT2Pyrite-1460,55411.181.5200.594.757.0464.958.09036.600.84938.065.065.8300.6220.3400.004012.1600.1560.0380.4200.46037.7400.180
19LIT2Pyrite-2564,28866.829.1901.1113.418.2123.366.00029.391.43718.63<0.5917.5500.5530.043<0.00149.7300.202<0.000.5100.87029.3400.140
19LIT2Pyrite-2563,55414.7252.33033.3882.096.128.952.0508.581.38626.725.041.3000.2600.080<0.00120.6900.1160.0040.8800.3435.7300.017
19LIT2Pyrite-2530,7046.781.6300.3914.568.6921.371.4700.311.62558.284.9913.4000.080<0.0110.00201.610<0.0150.0020.2900.1214.8300.026
19LIT2Pyrite-2555,48929.938.0302.016.823.2321.044.70013.381.11902.367.895.9700.9800.0960.00457.5200.0980.0490.6100.29123.0700.150
19LIT2Pyrite-2610,32513.676.9402.5514.992.5016.9410.79011.201.57919.011.966.7400.6290.1500.01413.3800.0260.0380.3000.56018.1100.058
19LIT2Pyrite-2607,6537.151.250<0.1027.822.0810.071.3801.091.15553.046.252.3800.1640.230<0.00151.5800.1750.012<0.0400.1134.7600.040

References

  1. Piercey, S.J. An overview of petrochemistry in the regional exploration for volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2010, 10, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Torró, L.; Benites, D.; Vallance, J.; Laurent, O.; Ortiz-Benavente, B.A.; Michou, C.C.; Proenza, J.A.; Fontboté, L. Trace element geochemistry of sphalerite and chalcopyrite in arc-hosted VMS deposits. J. Geochem. Explor. 2022, 232, 106882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yesares, L.; Pina, R.; Gonzalez-Jimenez, J.M.; Saez, R.; de Almodovar, G.R.; Fanlo, I.; Pons, J.M.; Vega, R. Distribution of critical metals in evolving pyrite from massive sulfide ores of the Iberian Pyrite Belt. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 153, 105275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barrie, C.T.; Cathles, L.M.; Erendi, A.; Schwaiger, H.; Murray, C.; Hannington, M.D. Heat and fluid flow in volcanic-associated massive sulfide-forming hydrothermal systems. Rev. Econ. Geol. 1999, 8, 201–219. [Google Scholar]
  5. Galley, A.G.; Hannington, M.D.; Jonasson, I.R. Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. In Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods; Goodfellow, W.D., Ed.; Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division: St. John’s, NL, Canada, 2007; Volume 5, pp. 141–161. [Google Scholar]
  6. Piercey, S.J. The setting, style, and role of magmatism in the formation of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits. Miner. Depos. 2011, 46, 449–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ross, P.S.; Mercier-Langevin, P. Igneous Rock Associations 14. The volcanic setting of VMS and SMS deposits: A review. Geosci. Can. 2014, 41, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hannington, M.D. Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits. Treatise Geochem. 2014, 13, 463–488. [Google Scholar]
  9. Patten, C.G.; Coltat, R.; Junge, M.; Peillod, A.; Ulrich, M.; Manatschal, G.; Kolb, J. Ultramafic-hosted volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits: An overlooked sub-class of VMS deposit forming in complex tectonic environments. Earth Sci. Rev. 2022, 224, 103891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grenne, T.; Ihlen, P.M.; Vokes, F.M. Scandinavian Caledonide metallogeny in a plate tectonic perspective. Miner. Depos. 1999, 34, 422–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Corfu, F.; Andersen, T.B.; Gasser, D. The Scandinavian Caledonides: Main features, conceptual advances and critical questions. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2014, 390, 9–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dunning, G.R.; Pedersen, R.B. U/Pb ages of ophiolites and arc-related plutons of the Norwegian Caledonides: Implications for the development of Iapetus. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 1988, 98, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pedersen, R.B.; Furnes, H. Geology, magmatic affinity and geotectonic environment of some Caledonian ophiolites in Norway. J. Geodyn. 1991, 13, 183–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roberts, D. The Scandinavian Caledonides: Event chronology, palaeogeographic settings and likely modern analogues. Tectonophysics 2003, 365, 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wulff, P.W. En Befaring af Cirka 100 Mineraliseringer i Sunnhordland, SV-Norge; NGU-rapport 96.139; Norges Geologiske Undersøkelse: Trondheim, Norway, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  16. Forsberg, F.R. Geochemical Characteristics of the Gold-Bearing Quartz Veins in the Lykling Area, Bømlo, SW Norway. Master’s Thesis, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  17. Paulsson, O.; Andréasson, P.G. Attempted break-up of Rodinia at 850 Ma: Geochronological evidence from the Seve–Kalak Superterrane, Scandinavian Caledonides. J. Geol. Soc. 2002, 159, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gee, D.G. Caledonides of the North Atlantic Region and Occurrence of Ophiolites. Acta Geol. Sin. (Engl. Ed.) 2015, 89, 13–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hacker, B.R.; Gans, P.B. Continental collisions and the creation of ultrahigh-pressure terranes: Petrology and thermochronology of nappes in the central Scandinavian Caledonides. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2005, 117, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Slagstad, T.; Kirkland, C.L. Timing of collision initiation and location of the Scandian orogenic suture in the Scandinavian Caledonides. Terra Nova 2018, 30, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fossen, H.; Hurich, C.A. The Hardangerfjord Shear Zone in SW Norway and the North Sea: A large-scale low-angle shear zone in the Caledonian crust. J. Geol. Soc. 2005, 162, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pedersen, R.B.; Furnes, H.; Dunning, G. Some Norwegian ophiolite complexes reconsidered. Nor. Geol. Unders. Spec. Publ. 1988, 3, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  23. Furnes, H.; Pedersen, R.B.; Hertogen, J.; Albrektsen, B.A. Magma development of the Leka ophiolite complex, central Norwegian Caledonides. Lithos 1991, 27, 259–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pedersen, R.B.; Furnes, H.; Dunning, G. AU/Pb age for the Sulitjelma Gabbro, north Norway: Further evidence for the development of a Caledonian marginal basin in Ashgill–Llandovery time. Geol. Mag. 1991, 128, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Slagstad, T.; Pin, C.; Roberts, D.; Kirkland, C.L.; Grenne, T.; Dunning, G.; Sauer, S.; Andersen, T. Tectonomagmatic evolution of the Early Ordovician suprasubduction-zone ophiolites of the Trondheim Region, Mid-Norwegian Caledonides. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2014, 390, 541–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Norwegian Geological Survey. Berggrunn—Nasjonal Berggrunnsdatabase. Available online: https://geo.ngu.no/kart/berggrunn_mobil/ (accessed on 25 March 2024).
  27. Brekke, H.; Furnes, H.; Nordås, J.; Hertogen, J. Lower Palaeozoic convergent plate margin volcanism on Bømlo, SW Norway, and its bearing on the tectonic environments of the Norwegian Caledonides. J. Geol. Soc. 1984, 141, 1015–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nordås, J.; Amaliksen, K.; Brekke, H.; Suthern, R.; Furnes, H.; Sturt, B.; Robins, B.; Gee, D. Lithostratigraphy and petrochemistry of Caledonian rocks on Bømlo, SW Norway. In The Caledonide Orogen—Scandinavia and Related Areas; Gee, D.G., Sturt, B.A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: New York, USA, 1985; pp. 679–692. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pedersen, R.B.; Dunning, G.R. Evolution of arc crust and relations between contrasting sources: U-Pb (age), Nd and Sr isotope systematics of the ophiolitic terrain of SW Norway. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 1997, 128, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Andersen, T.B.; Jansen, Ø.J. The Sunnhordland Batholith, W. Norway: Regional setting and internal structure, with emphasis on the granitoid plutons. Nor. Geol. Tidsskr. 1987, 67, 159–183. [Google Scholar]
  31. Scheiber, T.; Viola, G.; Wilkinson, C.M.; Ganerød, M.; Skår, Ø.; Gasser, D. Direct 40Ar/39Ar dating of Late Ordovician and Silurian brittle faulting in the southwestern Norwegian Caledonides. Terra Nova 2016, 28, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amaliksen, K. The Geology of the Lvkling Ophiolitic Complex, Bømlo, SW Norway. Unpubl. PhD Thesis, Bergen University, Bergen, Norway, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fjellet, T. Geochemical Characteristics of Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Mineralizations on Bømlo and Stord Islands, Sunnhordaland, SW Norway. Master’s Thesis, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, August 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Achterberg, E.; Ryan, C.; Jackson, S.E.; Griffin, W.L. Data reduction software for LA-ICP-MS. In Laser Ablation-ICP-Mass Spectrometry in the Earth Sciences: Principles and Applications; Mineralogical Association of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2001; pp. 239–243. [Google Scholar]
  35. Spangenberg, J.E.; Saintilan, N.J.; Palinkaš, S.S. Safe, accurate, and precise sulfur isotope analyses of arsenides, sulfarsenides, and arsenic and mercury sulfides by conversion to barium sulfate before EA/IRMS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 2163–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Warr, L.N. IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Miner. Mag. 2021, 85, 291–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Norwegian Geological Survey Mineral Resource Database. Available online: https://www.ngu.no/en/geologiske-kart/datasett (accessed on 25 March 2024).
  38. Pirajno, F.; Uysal, I.; Naumov, E.A. Oceanic lithosphere and ophiolites: Birth, life and final resting place of related ore deposits. Gondwana Res. 2020, 88, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Foose, M.P. The Setting of a Magmatic Sulfide Occurrence in a Dismembered Ophiolite, Southwest Oregon; Distribution Branch; USA Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1985; p. 1626. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bacuta, G.C.; Kay, R.W.; Gibbs, A.K.; Lipin, B.R. Platinum-group element abundance and distribution in chromite deposits of the Acoje Block. Zambales ophiolite Complex, Philippines. J. Geochem. Explor. 1990, 37, 113–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lorand, J.P.; Juteau, T. The Haymiliyah sulphide ores (Haylayn Massif, Oman Ophiolite): In-situ segregation of PGE-poor magmatic sulphides in a fossil oceanic magma chamber. Mar. Geophys. Res. 2000, 21, 327–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baumgartner, R.J.; Zaccarini, F.; Garuti, G.; Thalhammer, O.A.R. Mineralogical and geochemical investigation of layered chromitites from the Bracco–Gabbro complex, Ligurian ophiolite, Italy. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 2013, 165, 477–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cook, N.J.; Ciobanu, C.L.; George, L.L.; Crowe, B.; Wade, B.P. Trace element distributions in sulphides: Progress, problems and perspectives. Acta Geol. Sin. (Engl. Ed.) 2014, 88, 1444–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wohlgemuth-Ueberwasser, C.C.; Viljoen, F.; Petersen, S.; Vorster, C. Distribution and solubility limits of trace elements in hydrothermal black smoker sulfides: An in-situ LA-ICP-MS study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 159, 16–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Duran, C.J.; Dubé-Loubert, H.; Pagé, P.; Barnes, S.-J.; Roy, M.; Savard, D.; Cave, B.J.; Arguin, J.P.; Mansur, E.T. Applications of trace element chemistry of pyrite and chalcopyrite in glacial sediments to mineral exploration targeting: Example from the Churchill Province, northern Quebec, Canada. J. Geochem. Explor. 2019, 196, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Raič, S.; Molnár, F.; Cook, N.; OBrien, H.; Lahaye, Y. Application of lithogeochemical and pyrite trace element data for the determination of vectors to ore in the Raja Au-Co prospect, Northern Finland. Solid Earth Discuss. 2021, 13, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Reich, M.; Simon, A.C.; Deditius, A.; Barra, F.; Chryssoulis, S.; Lagas, G.; Tardani, D.; Knipping, J.; Bilenker, L.; Sánchez-Alfaro, P.; et al. Trace element signature of pyrite from the Los Colorados iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposit, Chile: A missing link between Andean IOA and iron oxide copper-gold systems? Econ. Geol. 2016, 111, 743–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sykora, S.; Cooke, D.R.; Meffre, S.; Stephanov, A.S.; Gardner, K.; Scott, R.; Selley, D.; Harris, A.C. Evolution of pyrite trace element compositions from porphyry-style and epithermal conditions at the Lihir gold deposit: Implications for ore genesis and mineral processing. Econ. Geol. 2018, 113, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Strmić Palinkaš, S.; Hofstra, A.H.; Percival, T.J.; Šoštarić, S.B.; Palinkaš, L.; Bermanec, V.; Pecskay, Z.; Boev, B. Comparison of the Allchar Au-As-Sb-Tl Deposit, Republic of Macedonia, with Carlin-Type Gold Deposits. In Diversity in Carlin-Style Gold Deposits; Muntean, J.L., Ed.; Society of Economic Geologists: Littleton, CO, USA, 2018; Volume 20. [Google Scholar]
  50. Steadman, J.A.; Large, R.R.; Olin, P.H.; Danyushevsky, L.V.; Meffre, S.; Huston, D.; Fabris, A.; Lisitsin, V.; Wells, T. Pyrite trace element behavior in magmatic-hydrothermal environments: An LA-ICPMS imaging study. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 128, 103878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Genna, D.; Gaboury, D. Deciphering the hydrothermal evolution of a VMS system by LA-ICP-MS using trace elements in pyrite: An example from the Bracemac-McLeod deposits, Abitibi, Canada, and implications for exploration. Econ. Geol. 2015, 110, 2087–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Belousov, I.; Large, R.R.; Meffre, S.; Danyushevsky, L.V.; Steadman, J.; Beardsmore, T. Pyrite compositions from VHMS and orogenic Au deposits in the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia: Implications for gold and copper exploration. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 79, 474–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dehnavi, A.S.; McFarlane, C.R.; Lentz, D.R.; Walker, J.A. Assessment of pyrite composition by LA-ICP-MS techniques from massive sulfide deposits of the Bathurst Mining Camp, Canada: From textural and chemical evolution to its application as a vectoring tool for the exploration of VMS deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 92, 656–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Maslennikov, V.V.; Maslennikova, S.P.; Large, R.R.; Danyushevsky, L.V. Study of trace element zonation in vent chimneys from the Silurian Yaman-Kasy volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposit (Southern Urals, Russia) using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS). Econ. Geol. 2009, 104, 1111–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Layton-Matthews, D.; Leybourne, M.I.; Peter, J.M.; Scott, S.D.; Cousens, B.; Eglington, B.M. Multiple sources of selenium in ancient seafloor hydrothermal systems: Compositional and Se, S, and Pb isotopic evidence from volcanic-hosted and volcanic-sediment-hosted massive sulfide deposits of the Finlayson Lake District, Yukon, Canada. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 117, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Martin, A.J.; McDonald, I.; MacLeod, C.J.; Prichard, H.M.; McFall, K. Extreme enrichment of selenium in the Apliki Cyprus-type VMS deposit, Troodos, Cyprus. Miner. Mag. 2018, 82, 697–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Martin, A.J.; McDonald, I.; Jamieson, J.W.; Jenkin, G.R.T.; McFall, K.A.; Piercey, G.; MacLeod, C.J.; Layne, G.D. Mineral-scale variation in the trace metal and sulfur isotope composition of pyrite: Implications for metal and sulfur sources in mafic VMS deposits. Miner. Depos. 2021, 57, 911–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Duran, C.J.; Barnes, S.-J.; Corkery, J.T. Chalcophile and platinum-group element distribution in pyrites from the sulfide-rich pods of the Lac des Iles Pd deposits, Western Ontario, Canada: Implications for post-cumulus re-equilibration of the ore and the use of pyrite compositions in exploration. J. Geochem. Explor. 2015, 158, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huston, D.L.; Sie, S.H.; Suter, G.F.; Cooke, D.R.; Both, R.A. Trace elements in sulfide minerals from eastern Australian volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits; Part I, Proton microprobe analyses of pyrite, chalcopyrite, and sphalerite, and Part II, Selenium levels in pyrite; comparison with delta 34 S values and implications for the source of sulfur in volcanogenic hydrothermal systems. Econ. Geol. 1995, 90, 1167–1196. [Google Scholar]
  60. George, L.L.; Cook, N.J.; Ciobanu, C.L. Partitioning of trace elements in co-crystallized sphalerite–galena–chalcopyrite hydrothermal ores. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 77, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. George, L.L.; Cook, N.J.; Crowe, B.B.; Ciobanu, C.L. Trace elements in hydrothermal chalcopyrite. Miner. Mag. 2018, 82, 59–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sahlström, F.; Palinkaš, S.S.; Dundas, S.H.; Sendula, E.; Cheng, Y.; Wold, M.; Pedersen, R.B. Mineralogical distribution and genetic aspects of cobalt at the active Fåvne and Loki’s Castle seafloor massive sulfide deposits, Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridges. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 153, 105261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Herzig, P.M.; Hannington, M.D.; Arribas, A., Jr. Sulfur isotopic composition of hydrothermal precipitates from the Lau back-arc: Implications for magmatic contributions to seafloor hydrothermal systems. Miner. Depos. 1998, 33, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hannington, M.D.; de Ronde, C.E.J.; Petersen, S. Sea-floor tectonics and submarine hydrothermal systems. In One Hundreth Anniversary Volume 1905—2005; Hedenquist, J.W., Thompson, J.F.H., Goldfarb, R.J., Richards, J.P., Eds.; Society of Economic Geologists: Littleton, CO, USA, 2005; pp. 111–141. [Google Scholar]
  65. Garuti, G.; Alfonso, P.; Proenza, J.A.; Zaccarini, F. Sulfur-isotope variations in sulfide minerals from massive sulfide deposits of the northern Apennine ophiolites: Inorganic and biogenic constraints. Ofioliti 2009, 34, 43–62. [Google Scholar]
  66. Grenne, T.; Slack, J.F. Mineralogy and geochemistry of silicate, sulfide, and oxide iron formations in Norway: Evidence for fluctuating redox states of early Paleozoic marine basins. Miner. Depos. 2019, 54, 829–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ohmoto, H. Formation of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits: The Kuroko perspective. Ore Geol. Rev. 1996, 10, 135–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Velasco, F.; Sánchez-España, J.; Boyce, A.J.; Fallick, A.E.; Sáez, R.; Almodóvar, G.R. A new sulphur isotopic study of some Iberian Pyrite Belt deposits: Evidence of a textural control on sulphur isotope composition. Miner. Depos. 1998, 34, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Simplified geological map of the Scandinavian Caledonides (after [14]) showing the location of the most prominent ophiolite complexes and the study area marked by a red square; (B) Geological setting of the Sunnhordland region in the Upper Allotone of the Scandinavian Caledonides (after [10]).
Figure 1. (A) Simplified geological map of the Scandinavian Caledonides (after [14]) showing the location of the most prominent ophiolite complexes and the study area marked by a red square; (B) Geological setting of the Sunnhordland region in the Upper Allotone of the Scandinavian Caledonides (after [10]).
Minerals 14 00384 g001
Figure 3. Local geological relationships at the study areas with labeled sampling locations: (A) Gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization in the Alsvågen area; (B) Basalt-hosted VMS mineralization in the Lindøya area; (C) Sediment-hosted VMS mineralization in the Litlabø area. The maps are based on the 1:250,000 geological map of the Norwegian Geological Survey [26].
Figure 3. Local geological relationships at the study areas with labeled sampling locations: (A) Gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization in the Alsvågen area; (B) Basalt-hosted VMS mineralization in the Lindøya area; (C) Sediment-hosted VMS mineralization in the Litlabø area. The maps are based on the 1:250,000 geological map of the Norwegian Geological Survey [26].
Minerals 14 00384 g003
Figure 4. (A) Surface exposure of the northern shear zone in the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit; (B) A hand specimen of weakly mineralized micro-gabbro from the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit; (C) A hand specimen of the massive sulfide mineralization from the Lindøya basalt-hosted deposit; (D) Subsurface exposure of the bedding-parallel massive sulfide mineralization hosted by organic-rich shale in the Litlabø sediment-hosted deposit; (E) Subsurface exposure of the massive sulfide mineralization in the Litlabø sediment-hosted deposit; (F) A hand specimen of the massive sulfide mineralization from the Litlabø sediment-hosted deposit.
Figure 4. (A) Surface exposure of the northern shear zone in the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit; (B) A hand specimen of weakly mineralized micro-gabbro from the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit; (C) A hand specimen of the massive sulfide mineralization from the Lindøya basalt-hosted deposit; (D) Subsurface exposure of the bedding-parallel massive sulfide mineralization hosted by organic-rich shale in the Litlabø sediment-hosted deposit; (E) Subsurface exposure of the massive sulfide mineralization in the Litlabø sediment-hosted deposit; (F) A hand specimen of the massive sulfide mineralization from the Litlabø sediment-hosted deposit.
Minerals 14 00384 g004
Figure 5. Microphotographs of: (A) Barren layered gabbro (PPL); (B) Barren layered gabbro (XPL); (C) Weakly mineralized isotropic gabbro (PPL); (D) Weakly mineralized isotropic gabbro (XPL); (E) Mineralized micro-gabbro from (PPL); (F) Mineralized micro-gabbro (XPL). Mineral abbreviations are according to [36]; Amp—amphibole, Chl—chlorite, Ep—epidote, Pl—plagioclase, Qz—quartz, Sauss—saussurite.
Figure 5. Microphotographs of: (A) Barren layered gabbro (PPL); (B) Barren layered gabbro (XPL); (C) Weakly mineralized isotropic gabbro (PPL); (D) Weakly mineralized isotropic gabbro (XPL); (E) Mineralized micro-gabbro from (PPL); (F) Mineralized micro-gabbro (XPL). Mineral abbreviations are according to [36]; Amp—amphibole, Chl—chlorite, Ep—epidote, Pl—plagioclase, Qz—quartz, Sauss—saussurite.
Minerals 14 00384 g005
Figure 6. Reflected light microphotographs of the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization: (A) Mineralization hosted by isotropic gabbro (PPL); (B) Massive sulfide mineralization hosted by the southern shear zone (PPL); (C) Massive sulfide mineralization hosted by the southern shear zone; (D) Hydrothermal veinlets hosted isotropic gabbro (PPL). Mineral abbreviations are according to [36]; Cbn—cubanite, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Ep—epidote, Py—pyrite, Pyh—pyrrhotite, Qz—quartz, Sp—sphalerite, Ttn—titanite.
Figure 6. Reflected light microphotographs of the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS mineralization: (A) Mineralization hosted by isotropic gabbro (PPL); (B) Massive sulfide mineralization hosted by the southern shear zone (PPL); (C) Massive sulfide mineralization hosted by the southern shear zone; (D) Hydrothermal veinlets hosted isotropic gabbro (PPL). Mineral abbreviations are according to [36]; Cbn—cubanite, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Ep—epidote, Py—pyrite, Pyh—pyrrhotite, Qz—quartz, Sp—sphalerite, Ttn—titanite.
Minerals 14 00384 g006
Figure 7. Microphotographs of the Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS mineralization: (A) Host basalt (transmitted light, PPL); (B) Massive sulfide mineralization (reflected light, PPL); (C) Massive sulfide mineralization (reflected light, PPL); (D) Disseminated sulfide mineralization (reflected light, PPL). Mineral abbreviations are according to [36]; Amp—amphibole, Apy—arsenopyrite, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Chl—chlorite, Mag—magnetite, Pl—plagioclase, Py—pyrite, Pyh—pyrrhotite, Sp—sphalerite.
Figure 7. Microphotographs of the Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS mineralization: (A) Host basalt (transmitted light, PPL); (B) Massive sulfide mineralization (reflected light, PPL); (C) Massive sulfide mineralization (reflected light, PPL); (D) Disseminated sulfide mineralization (reflected light, PPL). Mineral abbreviations are according to [36]; Amp—amphibole, Apy—arsenopyrite, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Chl—chlorite, Mag—magnetite, Pl—plagioclase, Py—pyrite, Pyh—pyrrhotite, Sp—sphalerite.
Minerals 14 00384 g007
Figure 8. Microphotographs of the Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS mineralization: (A) Pyrite-rich sulfide mineralization consisting of at least two generations of pyrite (earlier Py1 and later Py; reflected light, PPL); (B) Pyrrhotite-rich sulfide mineralization reflects episodes of brecciation (thick section scan). Mineral abbreviations are according to [36]; Py—pyrite.
Figure 8. Microphotographs of the Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS mineralization: (A) Pyrite-rich sulfide mineralization consisting of at least two generations of pyrite (earlier Py1 and later Py; reflected light, PPL); (B) Pyrrhotite-rich sulfide mineralization reflects episodes of brecciation (thick section scan). Mineral abbreviations are according to [36]; Py—pyrite.
Minerals 14 00384 g008
Figure 9. Base metal classification of the studied VMS deposits (after [5]).
Figure 9. Base metal classification of the studied VMS deposits (after [5]).
Minerals 14 00384 g009
Figure 10. Box and whisker plots for a selected range of trace elements measured in pyrrhotite, pyrite and chalcopyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-, Lindøya basalt- and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Abbreviations: G-Po: gabbro-hosted pyrrhotite; G-Py: gabbro-hosted pyrite; G-Py: gabbro-hosted chalcopyrite; B-Py: basalt-hosted pyrite; S-Py: sediment-hosted pyrite.
Figure 10. Box and whisker plots for a selected range of trace elements measured in pyrrhotite, pyrite and chalcopyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-, Lindøya basalt- and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Abbreviations: G-Po: gabbro-hosted pyrrhotite; G-Py: gabbro-hosted pyrite; G-Py: gabbro-hosted chalcopyrite; B-Py: basalt-hosted pyrite; S-Py: sediment-hosted pyrite.
Minerals 14 00384 g010
Figure 11. Box and whisker plots for illustrating the δ34S composition of sulfides from the Alsvågen gabbro-, Lindøya basalt- and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Abbreviations: G–Py: gabbro-hosted pyrite; G–Cpy: gabbro-hosted chalcopyrite; B–Py: basalt-hosted pyrite; B–Po: basalt-hosted pyrrhotite; S–Py: sediment-hosted pyrite; S–Po: sediment-hosted pyrrhotite.
Figure 11. Box and whisker plots for illustrating the δ34S composition of sulfides from the Alsvågen gabbro-, Lindøya basalt- and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Abbreviations: G–Py: gabbro-hosted pyrite; G–Cpy: gabbro-hosted chalcopyrite; B–Py: basalt-hosted pyrite; B–Po: basalt-hosted pyrrhotite; S–Py: sediment-hosted pyrite; S–Po: sediment-hosted pyrrhotite.
Minerals 14 00384 g011
Figure 12. (A) The Co/Sb vs. Se/As diagram [45,58] showing a contrasting trace element signature of pyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit (G–Py) compared to pyrite from the Lindøya basalt-hosted (B–Py) and the Litlabø sediment-hosted (S–Py) deposits; (B) Cd vs. Zn contents of chalcopyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit.
Figure 12. (A) The Co/Sb vs. Se/As diagram [45,58] showing a contrasting trace element signature of pyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit (G–Py) compared to pyrite from the Lindøya basalt-hosted (B–Py) and the Litlabø sediment-hosted (S–Py) deposits; (B) Cd vs. Zn contents of chalcopyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-hosted deposit.
Minerals 14 00384 g012
Figure 13. Discrimination binary diagrams based on the trace element composition of pyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-, Lindøya basalt- and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Abbreviations: G–Py: gabbro-hosted pyrite; B–Py: basalt-hosted pyrite; S–Py: sediment-hosted pyrite.
Figure 13. Discrimination binary diagrams based on the trace element composition of pyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-, Lindøya basalt- and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Abbreviations: G–Py: gabbro-hosted pyrite; B–Py: basalt-hosted pyrite; S–Py: sediment-hosted pyrite.
Minerals 14 00384 g013
Figure 14. Discrimination binary diagrams based on the trace element and δ34S composition of pyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-, Lindøya basalt- and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Abbreviations: G–Py: gabbro-hosted pyrite; B–Py: basalt-hosted pyrite; S–Py: sediment-hosted pyrite.
Figure 14. Discrimination binary diagrams based on the trace element and δ34S composition of pyrite from the Alsvågen gabbro-, Lindøya basalt- and Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposits. Abbreviations: G–Py: gabbro-hosted pyrite; B–Py: basalt-hosted pyrite; S–Py: sediment-hosted pyrite.
Minerals 14 00384 g014
Table 1. The ore grade analysis of selected mineralized samples from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits, SW Norway.
Table 1. The ore grade analysis of selected mineralized samples from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits, SW Norway.
MethodFA330MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370MA370
ElementAuAgMoCuPbZnNiCoMnFeAsSrCdSbBiCaPCrMgAlNaKWS
Unitppbppmwt.%
Sampled.l. *220.0010.0010.020.010.0010.0010.010.010.020.010.0010.010.010.010.010.0010.010.010.010.010.010.05
The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS deposit
20ALS7S1 403<0.0013339<0.020.01<0.0010.0040.099.04<0.020.02<0.001<0.01<0.012.180.18<0.0011.558.504.390.21<0.012.90
20ALS7S3 8512<0.001>10.000<0.020.040.0060.0290.0215.02<0.02<0.01<0.001<0.01<0.011.000.04<0.0010.901.580.170.03<0.0110.18
20ALS6D1 705<0.0015427<0.020.030.0100.0360.0419.47<0.02<0.01<0.001<0.01<0.010.710.010.0011.372.130.690.02<0.017.86
20ALS3S1 453<0.0011196<0.020.030.0050.0110.029.63<0.02<0.01<0.001<0.01<0.010.13<0.010.0120.380.570.110.02<0.015.76
The Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS deposit
20LIND4B 67<20.0040.008<0.020.020.003<0.0010.0330.610.03<0.01<0.001<0.01<0.010.16<0.010.0010.601.140.130.30<0.01>30.00
20LINDH 14<2<0.0010.006<0.020.010.001<0.0010.097.28<0.02<0.01<0.001<0.01<0.010.960.07<0.0013.049.124.830.11<0.014.19
The Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposit
19LIT3 201<20.0020.0560.070.120.0210.0050.1551.840.04<0.01<0.001<0.01<0.010.150.07<0.0010.170.360.030.12<0.0124.87
19LIT2 392<0.0010.035<0.020.040.006<0.0010.0738.400.05<0.01<0.001<0.01<0.010.70<0.01<0.0010.170.69<0.010.23<0.01>30.00
* d.l.—detection limit.
Table 2. Previously published ore grade analysis from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits, SW Norway *.
Table 2. Previously published ore grade analysis from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits, SW Norway *.
SampleElementCuZnFeMnSPbMoAsNiSeTlAgAu
Unitwt.%ppmppb
The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS deposit
Alsvåg 01 3.770.0420.10 8.5227.72374118<d.l. **3.335
Alsvåg 02 2.940.0211.56 3.5744.0031345<d.l.2.646
The Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS deposit
Lindøya 01 0.020.0239.5 -1241.3233761610.59
Lindøya 02 0.020.0231.8 -1526.342526<d.l.0.516
Lindøya 03 0.020.0233.9 -543.512601320.54
Lindøya 04 0.010.0330.9 -2430.6506359<d.l.0.525
The Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposit
HO0065.01 0.110.0447.830.2434.14371221412341--0.8284
HO0065.02 0.050.0431.180.8834.3920391027142--1.2160
HO0065.03 0.060.0433.030.7727.637813470103--0.327
HO0065.04 0.020.0427.730.6135.2140557174--0.322
HO0065.05 0.020.0324.711.7611.19251043041--1.47
HO0065.06 0.060.0647.110.0833.7213024729129--<d.l.25
HO0065.07 0.020.0327.830.1040.7562468481--0.426
HO0065.08 0.040.0544.110.0834.7015218744130--<d.l.39
HO0065.09 0.030.0326.390.4033.89769843110--0.332
*—data from the Norwegian Geological Survey mineral resource database; ** < d.l.—below detection limit.
Table 3. Sulfur isotope (δ34S) composition of sulfide minerals from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits, SW Norway.
Table 3. Sulfur isotope (δ34S) composition of sulfide minerals from the Alsvågen, Lindøya and Litlabø VMS deposits, SW Norway.
Sample Mineralogy δ34S
(VCDT, ‰)
The Alsvågen gabbro-hosted VMS deposit
20ALS3S1Pyrite0.5
20ALS3S2-po1Pyrite3.9
20ALS3S2-po2Pyrite0.4
20ALS4EPyrite1.8
20ALS4FPyrite3.0
20ALS7S1-po2Pyrite2.4
20ALS7S3-po1Pyrite1.4
20ALS7S3-po2Pyrite1.6
20ALS6D1-po1Pyrite1.5
20ALS6D1-po2Pyrite0.6
20ALS6D2Pyrite1.8
20ALS10BChalcopyrite0.9
The Lindøya basalt-hosted VMS deposit
20LIND-HPyrite4.9
20LIND4B-po1Pyrite5.9
20LIND4B-po2Pyrite5.7
20LIND4B-po3Pyrrhotite5.9
20LIND4B-po4Pyrrhotite5.7
The Litlabø sediment-hosted VMS deposit
19LIT2-po1Pyrite−19.3
19LIT2-po2Pyrite−19.7
19LIT3-po1Pyrrhotite−15.8
19LIT3-po2Pyrrhotite−15.7
19LIT3-po2 Pyrrhotite−15.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Strmic Palinkas, S.; Fjellet, T.; Stubseid, H.H.; Liu, X.; Spangenberg, J.E.; Čobić, A.; Pedersen, R.B. Trace Element and Sulfur Isotope Signatures of Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (VMS) Mineralization: A Case Study from the Sunnhordland Area in SW Norway. Minerals 2024, 14, 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040384

AMA Style

Strmic Palinkas S, Fjellet T, Stubseid HH, Liu X, Spangenberg JE, Čobić A, Pedersen RB. Trace Element and Sulfur Isotope Signatures of Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (VMS) Mineralization: A Case Study from the Sunnhordland Area in SW Norway. Minerals. 2024; 14(4):384. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040384

Chicago/Turabian Style

Strmic Palinkas, Sabina, Trond Fjellet, Håvard Hallås Stubseid, Xuan Liu, Jorge Enrique Spangenberg, Andrea Čobić, and Rolf Birger Pedersen. 2024. "Trace Element and Sulfur Isotope Signatures of Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (VMS) Mineralization: A Case Study from the Sunnhordland Area in SW Norway" Minerals 14, no. 4: 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040384

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop