Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Thin Coal Seam Detection in Eastern Indian Coalfields Using ICWT-Decon-Based Seismic Attributes and Acoustic Impedance Inversion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Sulfate and Nitrate for Lanthanum (III) Adsorption on Bentonite: Implications for Rare Earth Wastewater Disposal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparative Analysis of the Recovery of Cu2+ and Au from Washing Solution of Pyrite Concentrate Slag by Two Processes

1
Faculty of Metallurgical Energy and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
2
Yunnan Gold Group Weishan County Zhacun Gold Mine Co., Ltd., Dali 671000, China
3
Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
4
Heqing Beiya Mining Co., Ltd., Dali 671000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2024, 14(9), 921; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14090921 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 June 2024 / Revised: 18 August 2024 / Accepted: 23 August 2024 / Published: 7 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Comprehensive Utilization of Mineral Processing Wastewater)

Abstract

A large amount of pyrite concentrate slag washing solution is produced in China every year, and this contains valuable components such as Cu2+ and Au. The traditional treatment method not only pollutes the environment but also wastes metal resources. For the washing solution containing Cu2+ 437 mg/L and Au 0.13 mg/L, two new processes comprehensive recovery schemes were developed and compared in this paper, namely iron powder replacement pore filtration and neutralization precipitation pore filtration. When the iron powder replacement pore filtration process was adopted, Cu2+ and Au were mainly comprehensively recovered in the form of a mixture of sponge copper and particulate gold. The test results showed that the replacement optimal conditions involved a pH of 3.0, iron powder dosage of 6 g/L, and replacement time of 3.0 h. After replacement, the filter cloth with below 1 μm pore size was used for filtration. The recovery rate of Cu2+ in the washing solution was 98.13 and the total recovery rate of Au was 95.83%. Otherwise, when the neutralization precipitation pore filtration process was adopted, Cu2+ and Au were mainly comprehensively recovered in the form of a mixture of copper hydroxide and particulate gold. The test results showed that sodium hydroxide was used as the precipitant and the optimum neutralization pH value was 6.5. After precipitation, the filter cloth with a below 1 μm pore size was used for filtration. The recovery rate of Cu2+ in the washing solution was 97.35% and the total recovery rate of Au was 93.54%. The economic benefit estimation of the two processes showed that the neutralization precipitation pore filtration process had the advantages of low material consumption, low cost and high economic benefit.
Keywords: pyrite concentrate slag; washing solution; iron powder replacement; neutralization precipitation; micropore filtration pyrite concentrate slag; washing solution; iron powder replacement; neutralization precipitation; micropore filtration

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, K.; Qi, L.; Zhang, L. Comparative Analysis of the Recovery of Cu2+ and Au from Washing Solution of Pyrite Concentrate Slag by Two Processes. Minerals 2024, 14, 921. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14090921

AMA Style

Zhu K, Qi L, Zhang L. Comparative Analysis of the Recovery of Cu2+ and Au from Washing Solution of Pyrite Concentrate Slag by Two Processes. Minerals. 2024; 14(9):921. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14090921

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Kun, Lei Qi, and Libo Zhang. 2024. "Comparative Analysis of the Recovery of Cu2+ and Au from Washing Solution of Pyrite Concentrate Slag by Two Processes" Minerals 14, no. 9: 921. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14090921

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop