Next Article in Journal
Fungal Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infections
Next Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Value of Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in an Unselected Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Whole-Slide Image Analyzer Reveals a Distinctive Distribution of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Bioinformatics Analysis of the Prognostic Significance of CAND1 in ERα-Positive Breast Cancer

Diagnostics 2022, 12(10), 2327; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102327
by Rashed Alhammad
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Diagnostics 2022, 12(10), 2327; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102327
Submission received: 3 September 2022 / Revised: 25 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 27 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breast Cancer Biomarkers)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear author, the article is well written and is focused on the up-to-date genetic background of breast cancer. I have one remark : the authors present a table of gene-gene interractions....I recommend to ad also epigenetic regulation (e.g. miRNAs) as it was published in articles like:  Kudela E, Samec M, Koklesova L, Liskova A, Kubatka P, Kozubik E, Rokos T, Pribulova T, Gabonova E, Smolar M, Biringer K. miRNA Expression Profiles in Luminal A Breast Cancer-Implications in Biology, Prognosis, and Prediction of Response to Hormonal Treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 17;21(20):7691. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207691. PMID: 33080858; PMCID: PMC7589921.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors need to revise the paper thoroughly for English grammar bugs and phraseology carefully. Check all the abbreviation carefully and abbreviate all during its first use. Authors have not cite the most of the suggested references that matches the scope of the paper but cited number of unrelated references in the revised version of the paper. Rectify it carefully.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop