Next Article in Journal
Long Term Cell Immune Response to COVID-19 Vaccines Assessment Using a Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity (DTH) Cutaneous Test
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Impact of High Intensity Interval Training on Axial Psoriatic Arthritis Based on MR Images
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/diagnostics12061418
Review Report
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Advances in OCT Imaging in Myopia and Pathologic Myopia

Diagnostics 2022, 12(6), 1418; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061418
by Yong Li 1,2, Feihui Zheng 1, Li Lian Foo 1,2, Qiu Ying Wong 1, Daniel Ting 1,2, Quan V. Hoang 1,2,3,4, Rachel Chong 1,2, Marcus Ang 1,2 and Chee Wai Wong 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Diego De Ortueta
Reviewer 2:
Jingyu Wang
Diagnostics 2022, 12(6), 1418; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061418
Submission received: 6 May 2022 / Revised: 6 June 2022 / Accepted: 6 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Diagnostics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study is a good structured review about optical coherence tomography (OCT).

As the authors mention the development of OCT give us the possibility to analyse better the structure of the eye.

The authors give in the tittle the term OCT (optical coherence tomography) and OCTA (optical coherence tomography angiography) as the OCTA is a subtype of OCT I would change the tittle and only use the term OCT as you describe other subtypes of OCT.

In the abstract line 26 you use the abbreviation mCNV, as you don’t abbreviate other terms in the abstract I do not recommend to use the abbrevation in the abstract.

The authors use in the text a lot of abbreviation for names that are sometimes only use twice or three times in the next paragraph. I would recommend not use so many abbreviations.

The authors describe the different OCT, time resolution, spectral domain. Then they described the swept source but they don‘t give the resolution.

In conclusion a good redacted overview about OCT in myopia.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The introduction is not satisfied that the motivation of using OCT related techniques to investigate the myopia is not clear.

It’s kind of confusing for the classification of oct techniques. If TD-OCT was outdated in most scenarios, there will be no need to describe.

If widefield OCT, PS-OCT and portable OCT have not well been applied to investigate the myopia, there should be no need to list them.

It’s kind of weird that the authors did not give the data or describe how the changes of retinal thickness with the myopia.

For the pathology part, the reviewer is not an expert in ophthalmology, but the reviewer was wondering how much correlation that the pathology was to the myopia instead of the disease itself. If so, what information can be OCT related techniques bring?

Overall, too less quantitative data makes this paper may not be a comprehensive reference to other researchers.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The reviewer agreed to accept it.

Author Response

Thanks for accepting our article. We appreciate your kind comments and review for the article.

Back to TopTop