Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Matrix Metalloproteinase-11 Polymorphisms on Colorectal Cancer Progression and Clinicopathological Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Ecthyma Gangrenosum Secondary to Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in an Atopic Child with Transient Neutropenia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/diagnostics12071684
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Progress of Imaging in Diabetic Retinopathy—From the Past to the Present

by
Shintaro Horie
1 and
Kyoko Ohno-Matsui
2,*
1
Department of Advanced Ophthalmic Imaging, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
2
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(7), 1684; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071684
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 24 June 2022 / Accepted: 6 July 2022 / Published: 11 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Optics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Advancement of imaging technology in retinal diseases provides us more precise understanding and new insights into the diseases’ pathologies. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of sight-threatening retinal diseases worldwide. Colour fundus photography and fluorescein angiography have long been golden standard methods in detecting retinal vascular pathology in this disease. One of the major advancements is macular observation given by optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCT dramatically improves the diagnostic quality in macular edema in DR. The technology of OCT is also applied to angiography (OCT angiograph: OCTA), which enables retinal vascular imaging without venous dye injection. Similar to OCTA, in terms of their low invasiveness, single blue color SLO image could be an alternative method in detecting non-perfused areas. Conventional optical photography has been gradually replaced to scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO), which also make it possible to produce spectacular ultra-widefield (UWF) images. Since retinal vascular changes of DR are found in the whole retina up to periphery, it would be one of the best targets in UWF imaging. Additionally, evolvement of artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to automated diagnosis of DR, and AI-based DR management is one of the major topics in this field. This review is trying to look back on the progress of imaging of DR comprehensively from the past to the present.

1. Introduction

Evolution in retinal imaging almost equally mean progress in the management of retinal diseases. Conventional optical photography has been a standard method for more than half a century. Since the early 1970s, standardized fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy (DR) has been evaluated [1,2]. Grading of DR from color fundus photography was studied in a Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) group or Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) group following the Airlie House classification of DR [3,4]. In the early days, color fundus photography was taken by film camera, and film has been gradually replaced by digital cameras, along with digital angiography with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) [5]. More recently, color fundus imagery obtained by SLO has been also popular especially in obtaining wide-field images. Regardless of each type of optical technology or the field of view covered, color fundus imagery can show changes originated from lesions in any stages of DR, such as fundus examination by biomicroscope.
Fluorescein angiography (FA) is another vital examination in DR and retinal vascular diseases [6]. It has been a gold standard method in detecting various vessel changes found in DR, especially in finding retinal microaneurysms, non-perfusion areas, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA), or retinal neovascularization with dye leakage [7,8,9]. Intravenously injected fluorescein sodium is excited by blue wavelength flashlight through an exciter filter, and the excited reflection is detected by either film or a digital system through the barrier filter. Since systemic administration of fluorescein iokljdye has potential risk of allergy or anaphylaxis in the most severe cases, the indication of the examination is limited [10,11].
Following the introduction of digitalization into the fundus camera, film-based printed photography has become digital image data. Stereoscopic photography has been less popular together with this, partly because optical coherence tomography (OCT) was introduced [12,13]. However, it is apparently useful in managing large numbers of clinical data with digitalized ones, and obtaining montage fundus photographs with digital images has been much easier than with printed photography. Digital images are also a technical basis of trial in automated diagnosis, which has been investigated since the early 2000s [14] and is applied to more recent evolution with artificial intelligence [15,16,17,18].
Subsequent evolution of the fundus camera was the introduction of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO). Scanning fundus by laser yields high-resolution images of retina, and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging, even through small pupils, was dramatically launched with Optos (Optos plc) [19,20]. Retinal images of more than 100 degrees field of view are termed as UWF images, and DR with peripheral retinal lesions is one of the best indications of UWF imaging. In addition to laser with two or three colors (red, green, with or without blue), light-emitting diode (LED), is also used for light sources in scanning ophthalmoscopy [21].
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is one of the most remarkable breakthroughs in retinal imaging and has greatly contributed to assessment of DR [22]. In eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME), OCT provides a large amount of information of the inner retinal structure to us. Today, OCT is an essential tool in the clinical management of DME. In addition to conventional tomographic images of the macula or retina, retinal vascular images such as FA without dye injection are provided with the more recent technology of OCT angiography [22,23,24,25,26]. The latest development in OCT angiography presents us widefield vascular images of retina, from which we can find non-perfused areas (NPAs) or neovascularization (NV) clearly.

2. Evolutions of Contemporary Modalities in Imaging of DR

2.1. Color Fundus Photography

History of fundus images obtained by fundus cameras dates to late 19th century, and modern fundus photographs were reported by Friedrich Dimmer in the early 20th century following the introduction of a commercial device from Carl Zeiss [27]. The first fundus atlas was published in 1927 by Dimmer’s associate Pilate, which included stereoscopic images by this time [28]. Color film and electronic flash were cooperated into photography in the pre- and post-war era. After 1955, a commercially easy affordable fundus camera was available worldwide, and fundus photography has become popular and fundamental data in ophthalmology. Later, ETDRS adopted stereoscopic seven-field photographs (30-degree color fundus fields) and examined in many clinical trials [4]. Stereopsis is obtained by utilizing a stereoscopic viewer. Stereopsis has been considered useful especially in detecting macular edema, traction retinal detachment, or distinguishing neovascularization (NV) on the retinal surface between intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA) in DR. However, in many clinics in the real world, non-stereoscopic photography of single or two-field (30- or 45-degree fields) is also a popular method in the management of DR. In terms of recording media for photography, film has been replaced by digital storage, which enables us to find images on a monitor on camera or transmit them to other computed devices, and stereoscopic photography has been less common in the era of digital data. Even though ETDRS seven-field standard photography may cover a majority of retinal lesions of DR, it is certainly not perfect in the entire vascular change of DR in periphery. Taking seven-field photographs is not sufficient in detecting peripheral lesion in DR, which is almost outside of seven-field standards [29,30,31]. To solve these problems, UWF retinal image obtained by single acting had been widely anticipated. Comparative studies between non-mydriatic or mydriatic UWF images and ETDRS seven-field standard images were investigated [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Automated DR diagnosis in fundus photography, one of the software with artificial intelligent was recently approved by FDA, adopts two-fields photographs [38], and such cost-effective screening of this disease is another hot topic.

2.2. Ultra-Widefield (UWF) Imaging and Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO)

Since technology of SLO has been introduced to fundus photography in recent eras, a UWF retinal image can be obtained with a quick action. Not only is it easy to obtain broad images of the retina, UWF images help us understand characteristics of the fundus immediately. In previous eras, a montage of seven or more conventional field (30- or 45-degree) photographs has been accepted as whole or panoramic retinal fundus images for a long time. Confocal SLO for FA/indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has been commercially available since early 1990s from Heidelberg Engineering, and their technology has been improved to supply multicolor WF photographic instruments with additional fundus autofluorescence (FAF) recently [39]. Concurrently, the concept of UWF photography covering maximum 200 degrees field of view has been developed by Optos Plc [19,20]. This technology is a milestone achievement in the history of fundus imaging, as 200-degree fields of view cover more than approximately 80% of the fundus area comparing to that of 30% in seven-field standards, and the new era of WF imagery started in modern clinical scene. In addition, the importance of detecting peripheral lesions in DR has been paid more attention, and comparative studies between UWF and conventional seven-field photographs were reported [32,33,34]. Following the breakthrough of UWF imaging by Optos, other ophthalmic industries launched WF/UWF technology. Clarus (133 degree) by Carl Zeiss [21] and Mirante (163 degree) by NIDEK [40], (Figure 1 and Figure 2), other devices for UWF imaging with various imaging modalities, are now commercially available (Table 1). Multicolor laser or light-emitting diode (LED) are adopted in the cameras, and they scan fundus thoroughly in order to obtain an entire image without mydriasis and avoiding stressful glaring of examinee. The characteristics of three currently available UWF cameras are summarized in Table 1. Ultra-wide field imaging has been applied to FA, and DR is one of the best indications of UWF-FA since DR is potentially involved not only in posterior fundus but in the entire area up to periphery. Retinal non-perfusion area and ischemia outside of ETDRS seven-fields has now been evaluated more accurately; this gives us new insight and tools in the management of DR.

2.3. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and OCT Angiography (OCTA)

Development of OCT is one of the real breakthroughs in retinal imaging. Different from color fundus photography, it presents us internal information of the retina, choroid, or even posterior vitreous [22]. From the 1990s, application of OCT technology in ocular imaging was reported [12]. The first commercial OCT instrument was introduced by Carl Zeiss Inc., (Dresden, Germany). in 1996. The basal technology of first-generation OCT is time domain technology [41]. Subsequently, spectral domain (high-definition or Fourier domain) and swept-source technology developed into a more recent model with higher resolution, and wider or deeper range OCT images have been available [42,43,44,45]. This new imaging is useful especially in diagnosis of abnormalities in vitreoretinal interfaces or macular edema in DR [22] and is positioned as a first line of assessment for DME. Structural information both inside and outside of the retina has been visible in more detail along with the development of OCT technology. Recent swept-source OCT can show 10 layers of histological sections of the retina in high resolution. Exudative components derived from breakdown of the inner and outer retinal barrier are identified in exact locations as outer plexiform layer, inner nuclear layer, or subretinal space. Additionally, numerous critical pathological observations related to DME and prognosis has been found by this advancement of imaging. Furthermore, choroid has been more easily observable by introducing enhanced-depth imaging technology to OCT. Another trend of significant development in this imaging technology is the application of vascular imaging in the retina and choroid. This new modality is called as OCTA [23,24,46], in which detection of flow of erythrocyte in vessels is core technology. One of the notable advantages of OCTA is its three-dimensional ability to detect vascular flow in the retina, and that is distinct character by FA. We can distinguish capillary plexus in the different depth of layer by OCTA technology, which is impossible by FA. This technology enables us to identify more precise locations of vascular abnormalities, such as enlargement of the foveal avascular zone or microaneurysm of superficial or deep capillary plexus.
Recent swept source OCTA (OCT-S1, Canon) covers not only the macular area but also a wider field (21 × 23 mm) up to periphery [47], Figure 1.

2.4. Adaptive Optics

Technology of adaptive optics (AO) has been applied to retinal imaging in DR [48]. The AO-SLO camera enables us to observe retinal structure at the cellular level or the dynamics of the cell flow of the inner retina. High resolution AO-SLO imaging showed in vivo observation of micro-changes of capillary such as occlusion, recanalization, dilatation, resolution of local retinal hemorrhage, capillary hairpin formation, capillary bend formation, or microaneurysm formation in the macula area of DR patients [49]. This technology is especially of scientific value in retina research, obtaining a retinal image in extreme high magnification in vivo. RTX1 AO retinal camera provided by Imagine Eyes (Orsay, France) is the commercial instrument of this technology.

3. General Characteristics of Imaging in DR

3.1. Mild Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)

According to the standard classification of AAO (2017), retinal microaneurysms (MAs) or moderate retinal hemorrhage are major retinal findings in mild to moderate diabetic retinopathy [50]. In fundus color photography, a red dot smaller than 125 microns in diameter with sharp margins in color fundus or FA is defined as MA [51] and is distinguished from hemorrhage. Fundus with MAs only indicates mild DR, and the diabetic eye with MAs plus hemorrhages, etc. is classified as more than moderate DR. FA is the most sensitive method in detecting retinal MAs and can distinguish them from retinal hemorrhages. Some of MAs are also detected by OCT as hyper-reflections with hyporeflective space inside. OCT angiography is superior to OCT section in detecting Mas, while OCTA cannot detect MAs without or slow flow below the threshold. Although FA is a more sensitive method in finding MAs, OCTA can distinguish whether it is existing in a superficial capillary plexus or a deep capillary plexus, which is difficult in FA [22,23,52]. Furthermore, OCTA can detect pre-clinical foveal microvascular change in DR [53].

3.2. Moderate to Severe NPDR

Severe NPDR is defined as the eye with severe intraretinal hemorrhage and MAs, venous beading in more than two quadrants, or any intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs). Moderate NPDR is less than severe NPDR but more than the eye with MAs only in recent AAO classification [50]. NPDR includes most of the DR findings except retinal neovasculatization or vitreous hemorrhage and is based on seven standard fields of color photographs but FA. A retinal hemorrhage is found relatively easily in color photography but is difficult to find in FA. In OCT images, it presents as a moderate reflection and is not clearly defined. Hard exudates are also typical findings in NPDR, showing yellowish distinct appearance in color photographs as well as in biomicroscopes. The presence of hard exudates indicates chronic leakage from MAs or retinal vessels. In OCT, hard exudates are detected as hyper-reflection in various sizes, and look like tiny hyper-reflective foci, which is also possibly a precursor of hard exudates [54]. Following early changes of microcapillary structure, i.e., loss of pericytes, breaks of tight junction of capillary endothelium, or formations of Mas, loss of vascular unit of capillary networks connected arterioles or venules progress [55,56], also with disruption of neural networks [57], retinal area with loss of blood flow with obstructing vessels is termed as retinal nonperfused areas (NPAs), and it leads to tissue ischemia [55,56,57]. The ischemia also causes the release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from retinal cells, and the cytokine induces the progression of stage from NPDR to proliferative DR (PDR). Treating identified NPAs by photocoagulation can possibly inhibit the development of neovascularization and worsening from NPDR to PDR [58,59,60]. FA is an outstanding method in detecting many DR findings in this stage, as it directly captures vascular networks and dynamics. FA has been the most common method in detecting NPAs in the clinical scene, and WF-FA is more useful in detecting the NPAs in the peripheral retina [61,62,63,64,65,66]. However, one of major problems is FA requires an intravenous injection of fluorescein sodium, and serious anaphylaxis cannot be perfectly prevented [10,11]. OCTA is a novel hopeful method for overcoming such problems of FA. OCTA detects and shows us high-resolution retinal blood flow as three-dimensional vessel structures [23,24,46], although it cannot show dynamics of blood flow and leakage from vessels. The advent of widefield OCTA has allowed clinicians to examine areas similar to ETDRS standard seven-fields avoiding serious side effects in examinee [66,67].

3.3. Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)

PDR is defined as the eye with any retinal neovascularization (NV). DR with vitreous hemorrhage is also included this stage because of highly supposed existence of retinal NVs of DR [3,51]. While color photography or biomicroscopes are useful in detecting NVs and basic methods of fundus examination, retinal NV is not always easy to find by these examinations. Regarding PDR, FA is one of the most sensitive methods in detecting NV, as it presents massive fluorescein dye leakage. Since NV is aberrant immature blood vessels lacking normal tight junctions, and invading and distributing in vitreous, fluorescein dye easily leaks from NV to vitreous and presents massive hyperfluorescence in the FA image. As mentioned above, disadvantage of FA is an invasive technique, and it cannot be performed on all DR patients [10,11]. OCTA is a novel alternative method for the angiography without need of dye injection. Although dye leakage from NV is not able to be shown in this method, pathological vascular networks can be more clearly defined without disturbance. Recent WF swept source OCTA can detect NVs on periphery, and this is a promising advancement of retinal imaging in this field [66,67,68,69]. However, obtaining a clear OCTA image of the periphery by conventional OCT devices is difficult especially in eyes with opacities in the media. In another point of view, direct observation of NV during vitrectomy with or without OCT combined in surgical microscope is also possible [70].

3.4. Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)

DME is one of the major complications as a sight threatening pathophysiology in DR and is characterized as intra-subretinal fluid with disorganization of macula. Stereoscopic photography of macular area has been one of the standard methods in detecting DME and included in ETDRS seven-field [52]. FA has been another gold standard method in diagnosing DME, since fluorescein dye pools in intraretinal cystoid space typically in Henle’s fiber layer or staining macular area with dye leakage from capillaries and vessels. In addition to these classical methods, OCT is a true milestone in the revolution of macular imaging [13]. Cystoid spaces, intraretinal fluid, or subretinal fluid are now easily visible in vivo by this method (Figure 2). Association of macular non-perfusion assessed by FA and central subfield thickness measured with OCT was examined [71]. OCT has elucidated numerous changes and understanding of this pathology in DME, such disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) [72,73], hyper-reflective foci [54], or that disruption of Elipsoid zone or ELM indicates macular dysfunction [74,75,76]. The application of each imaging modality to any stages of DR in clinical settings is reviewed and summarized in Table 2. OCTA of the macular area is also clinically valuable for DME. Enlargement of the foveal avascular zone found in OCTA was reported in DME [77]. The association of chronic macular cysts and capillary non-perfusion in DME was investigated [78]. It was also reported that several biomarkers in OCTA images was improved following anti-VEGF injection [79].

4. Recent Topics in Imaging in DR

4.1. UWF Blue SLO Image in Detection of Retinal Ischemia

The advantages of widefield image compared to conventional devices are not only its ease in obtaining images of wide areas of the fundus, but it also allows the acquisition of seamless images avoiding the absence of some areas of the far periphery. This is especially useful to find the retinal non-perfused areas in eyes with DR as much as possible. At present, UWF and multicolor SLO imaging can be performed by the Optos (Optos plc, UK), Mirante (NIDEK, Japan) and Clarus (Carl Zeiss, Germany) (Table 2). The Mirante device is a multimodal imaging ophthalmic instrument whose image covers a field of view of 163 degrees, narrower than 200 degrees field of view of Optos. The color images are obtained by three colors (red, green, and blue), while Optos is constituted with red and green colors. The additional blue light renders interesting character to the image of Mirante [40]. In the multicolor SLO images, each colors shows the lesion differently because of the differential absorption of each wavelength. There was a previous study reporting hyporeflectons in the red-free SLO highly corresponded with the NPAs in eyes with RVO and DR [80]. Since DR lesions are found throughout the retina including peripheral lesions, WF imaging is especially useful in finding NPAs. In our study, the blue WF-SLO image taken by Mirante showed fundus hyporeflective areas in the eyes with more than moderate to severe NPDR. Among the total 92 eyes, 73 eyes with more than moderate/severe NPDR had hyporeflective areas in the blue SLO images (79.3%). Additionally, substantial concordance between the hyporeflective areas of blue SLO and the NPAs of FA was confirmed (Cohen’s Kappa: 0.675). The location of the hyporeflective areas identified in the blue SLO images were found within the location of the NPAs of FA images in more than moderate to severe NPDR (Figure 3). In the UWF-OCT analysis, retinal thinning and disorganization were observed in hyporeflections, and we speculated it is one of the possible reasons why hyporeflections in blue SLO were found in ischemic retinas. The blue wavelength may easily penetrate the ischemic retinal layers with structural disorganization. According to this study, Mirante has practical value in the management of the eyes with referable DR because it sufficiently covers fundus fields with essential retinal information [40].

4.2. UWF-FA and Quantification of Retinal Non-Perfused Areas

Retinal pathology in DR is not only found in up to mid-peripheral retina but also in far periphery. Peripheral lesions identified in UWF image (Optos), also outside of ETDRS seven-field, may increase severity scale of DR [30]. Recently, DR lesions with a greater extent of outside vs. inside ETDRS standard seven-field is named as predominantly peripheral lesions (PPLs) [31], and the association with DR progression or severity is reported [81]. Current progress of UWF technology to FA enables us to find peripheral NPAs more easily and with high precision. Since FA shows us retinal NPAs as defection of capillary network, quantification of NPAs in UWF FA image of Optos with the combined software analysis is possible. One of the comprehensive analyses reported that 70% of NPAs are located outside the posterior pole, and increased NPA is associated with PPL found in UWF-FA [65]. UWF-FA analyzed to assess retinal leakage, ischemia, or count of Mas was also associated with DR stage [63]. The relation of quantified NPAs to DME [61,62], prognostic value [64], or the effect of anti-VEGF treatment on NPA [82] were reported. Additionally, fractal dimension (FD) analysis, which is a novel technique of quantification, has been applied to quantification of retinal vasculature [83,84]. Retinal vascular bed area (RVB) by FD analysis was examined in relation to severity of macular edema [85], NPAs [86], or DR stages [87,88].

4.3. WF-OCTA

OCT angiography (OCTA) is one of the major breakthroughs in retinal imaging. Commercial availability of this instrument started from 2014 by Optovue Inc (UK), followed by many manufacturers currently. Since this technology is detecting red blood cell flow of retinal perfusion but capillary or vessels walls themselves, vessels without or with quite low perfusion were not depicted. Compared to FA, the predominant characteristics of OCTA imagery are high-resolution capillary networks with different layers through chorioretinal depths. However, OCTA cannot detect leakage from vessels and dynamics of blood flow, like they are easily shown in FA. Recent models of this new modality such as Canon S1 OCTA covers maximum 23 mm × 20 mm area [47], and around 12 mm square area are covers in widely used instruments as PLEX Elite (Zeiss) [25,26,69]. The development of capturing broader areas in a single taking action substitutes panoramic montage OCTA image and has great potential in evaluating NPAs in future. Comparing the detection rate of any DR abnormality among OCTA and ETDRS seven-field color fundus photography was studied, and the rate of IRMA was especially higher in WF-OCTA [25]. WF-OCTA could detect NPA [66] or NV [66,68] rate similar to UWF-FA at a high rate.
However, since leakage from vessels cannot be shown in this way, retinal neovascularization should be carefully inspected compared to FA. Additionally, it is still not easy to capture fine images constantly because it is easy to be influenced by eye movement or media opacity. Therefore, OCTA is developing technology so far, but has great potential in substituting FA and may be a sufficient method for detection of NPA, NV, or IRMA in DR [89].

4.4. Automated Diagnosis in DR

Given the high prevalence and social importance of screening DR, it has been one of the best and popular target diseases of automated diagnosis. Automated retinal image analysis software has potential to substitute conventional photo-based screening by ophthalmologist or physicians [90]. IDx-DR (Digital Diagnostics) was the first artificial intelligence diagnostic software for DR screening approved by FDA and combined with automated non-mydriasis fundus camera of Topcon. Following the approval from FDA, it has been introduced in several countries and areas. This system diagnosis with two conventional 45-degree photographs of macular-centered and disc-centered and was reported to offer sufficient quality of detecting referable DR compared to human grading [16]. Many studies also reported high rate of sensitivity and specificity of autonomous-AI diagnosis system in diagnosing any stage of DR [38,90,91,92,93,94,95]. Diagnostic sensitivity of the algorithm (2iRetinex) for DR to sight threatening vision was examined, and the sensitivity is nearly identical to diagnosis by physician [92]. However, the AI-based diagnosis system is based on two-dimensional photography with limited retinal areas than seven-fields standard or wide-field image. Lack of stereoscopic observation possibly influences the detection of macular edema or fibrovascular change of PDR. Additionally, recent UWF imaging could detect peripheral dominant lesions of DR. Comparing automated diagnosis with a narrower field of image to UWF imaging diagnosed by retina specialist should be discussed in the future.

5. Discussion

Since the history of retinal imaging in the eyes with DR initiated from fundus film-based photography, the method has been evolving to depict more magnified or wider retinal images with less invasiveness to the examinee. In addition to fundus photography, OCT is another new powerful technique of retinal imaging, which enables us to watch the live status of pathological changes of DR.
ETDRS stereoscopic seven-field standard photography has long been a golden standard in the diagnosis and evaluation of DR, especially in investigating studies. Clinically, the major sight-threatening pathological changes of DR are edema or retinal detachment in the macular area other than persistent vitreous hemorrhage. Stereoscopic evaluation of the macular area and fibrovascular proliferation lineated vascular arcade or optic disc are well-identified and covered by this classical method. However, obtaining stereoscopic photographs requires much more effort, and advantages of this method can be substituted by OCT or direct fundus examination by biomicroscope.
One of the trends in evolution of retinal imaging is capturing a wider area in single photograph [96]. Before introducing widefield imaging technology based on scanning light sources, a montage image had been frequently made with classical 30/45 degrees of field photographs. Recent technology with scanning with multiple colors of lasers or LED replaced such incomplete “widefield” retinal images as montage photographs are quite difficult to be made seamlessly. Moreover, the new technology is coupled with capturing images even without mydriasis. Optos (Optos plc, UK) is the pioneer of this kind of new generation of fundus photography and has been a synonym of UWF photography, as it covers the widest field of view (200 degrees). Later introduced UWF instruments are Mirante (NIDEK, Japan) and Clarus (Carl Zeiss, Germany), and these are characterized as three-color synthetic images, which aim to obtain realistic retinal images. Additionally, the image of single-component colors has its own characteristics and has great potential in diagnosis of retinal diseases [97,98,99,100,101]. The blue SLO image of Mirante can detect retinal non-perfused area without any dye injection and has potential to substitute FA [40]. The advantage and demand of widefield imaging in DR clinics is in no doubt, and it will be utilized more in practice soon.
Another trend in this field is given by the advancement of OCT technology. OCT of the new generation as swept-source instruments shows us the inside of the retina or even of choroid, like histological sections in high resolution in vivo. With this technology, we now can evaluate or predict macular function. The technology is now not only limited to the macular area but is also applied to ultra-widefield imaging [42,43,44,45,47]. Another advantage of OCT technology is its characteristic of relatively low invasiveness. OCT can replace the necessity of FA in evaluating macular disease such as DME, and widefield OCTA can be a great alternative to find retinal non-perfusions in DR.
In addition to these novel technologies, automated diagnosis by artificial intelligence is the most noteworthy topic in DR imaging, and many screening programs with or without telemedicine have been studied [102]. Smartphone-based automated diagnosing software was also reported [103] and has great potential in management of DR for the under-resourced African population [104]. In the future, it is prospected that technology of UWF fundus images, sectional OCT or OCTA will be continuously developed, and trial of auto-diagnosis by AI will be also combined to these modalities, thus more people will be diagnosed precisely with less effort worldwide.

Author Contributions

S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.O.-M.; review and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by research grant: 21AA110314 by NIDEK (Japan).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tokyo Medical and Dental University (protocol code M2020-093 and 10 July 2020).” for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

The Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University approved the procedures and waivers of informed consent from all subjects in data-based retrospective observational study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

SH belongs to the Department of Advanced Ophthalmic Imaging in Tokyo Medical and Dental University, which is funded by NIDEK Corporation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this submission.

References

  1. Parr, J.; Spears, G. Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy by Point-Counting on a Standardized Photographic Sample of the Retina. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1972, 74, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy: ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology 1991, 98 (Suppl. 5), 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Diabetic retinopathy study. Report Number 6. Design, methods, and baseline results. Report Number 7. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Prepared by the Diabetic Retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1981, 21 Pt 2, 1–226. [Google Scholar]
  4. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research. Ophthalmology 1991, 98, 786–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Frambach, D.A.; Dacey, M.P.; Sadun, A. Stereoscopic Photography with a Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1993, 116, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gass, J.D.M. A Fluorescein Angiographic Study of Macular Dysfunction Secondary to Retinal Vascular Disease. IV. Diabetic retinal angiopathy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1968, 80, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shimizu, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Muraoka, K. Midperipheral Fundus Involvement in Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1981, 88, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Niki, T.; Muraoka, K.; Shimizu, K. Distribution of Capillary Nonperfusion in Early-stage Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1984, 91, 1431–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Muraoka, K.; Shimizu, K. Intraretinal Neovascularization in Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1984, 91, 1440–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pacurariu, R.I. Low incidence of side effects following intravenous fluorescein angiography. Ann. Ophthalmol. 1982, 14, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  11. Razvi, F.M.; Kritzinger, E.E.; Tsaloumas, M.D.; Ryder, R.E.J. Use of oral fluorescein angiography in the diagnosis of macular oedema within a diabetic retinopathy screening programme. Diabet. Med. 2001, 18, 1003–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Swanson, E.A.; Izatt, J.A.; Lin, C.P.; Fujimoto, J.G.; Schuman, J.; Hee, M.R.; Huang, D.; Puliafito, C.A. In vivo retinal imaging by optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett. 1993, 18, 1864–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hee, M.R.; Puliafito, C.A.; Wong, C.; Duker, J.S.; Reichel, E.; Rutledge, B.; Schuman, J.; Swanson, E.A.; Fujimoto, J.G. Quantitative Assessment of Macular Edema with Optical Coherence Tomography. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1995, 113, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sinthanayothin, C.; Boyce, J.F.; Williamson, T.H.; Cook, H.L.; Mensah, E.; Lal, S.; Usher, D. Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on digital fundus images. Diabet. Med. 2002, 19, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ting, D.S.W.; Cheung, C.Y.-L.; Lim, G.; Tan, G.S.W.; Quang, N.D.; Gan, A.; Hamzah, H.; Garcia-Franco, R.; Yeo, I.Y.S.; Lee, S.Y.; et al. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images from Multiethnic Populations with Diabetes. JAMA 2017, 318, 2211–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Der Heijden, A.A.; Abramoff, M.D.; Verbraak, F.; Van Hecke, M.V.; Liem, A.; Nijpels, G. Validation of automated screening for referable diabetic retinopathy with the IDx-DR device in the Hoorn Diabetes Care System. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shah, A.; Clarida, W.; Amelon, R.; Hernaez-Ortega, M.C.; Navea, A.; Morales-Olivas, J.; Dolz-Marco, R.; Verbraak, F.; Jorda, P.P.; van der Heijden, A.A.; et al. Validation of Automated Screening for Referable Diabetic Retinopathy with an Autonomous Diagnostic Artificial Intelligence System in a Spanish Population. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2021, 15, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, X.; Li, F.; Li, D.; Wei, Q.; Han, X.; Zhang, B.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Mo, B.; Hu, B.; et al. Automated detection of severe diabetic retinopathy using deep learning method. Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2022, 260, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Manivannan, A.; Plskova, J.; Farrow, A.; Mckay, S.; Sharp, P.F.; Forrester, J.V. Ultra-Wide-Field Fluorescein Angiography of the Ocular Fundus. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 140, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mackenzie, P.J.; Russell, M.; Ma, P.E.; Isbister, C.M.; Maberley, D.A.L. Sensitivity and specificity of the optos optomap for detecting peripheral retinal lesions. Retina 2007, 27, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hirano, T.; Imai, A.; Kasamatsu, H.; Kakihara, S.; Toriyama, Y.; Murata, T. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and Optos™ systems. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018, 18, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Schreur, V.; Larsen, M.B.; Sobrin, L.; Bhavsar, A.R.; Hollander, A.I.D.; Klevering, B.J.; Hoyng, C.B.; de Jong, E.K.; Grauslund, J.; Peto, T. Imaging diabetic retinal disease: Clinical imaging requirements. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ishibazawa, A.; Nagaoka, T.; Takahashi, A.; Omae, T.; Tani, T.; Sogawa, K.; Yokota, H.; Yoshida, A. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy: A Prospective Pilot Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 160, 35–44.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Salz, D.A.; De Carlo, T.E.; Adhi, M.; Moult, E.M.; Choi, W.; Baumal, C.R.; Witkin, A.J.; Duker, J.S.; Fujimoto, J.G.; Waheed, N.K. Select Features of Diabetic Retinopathy on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography Compared with Fluorescein Angiography and Normal Eyes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sawada, O.; Ichiyama, Y.; Obata, S.; Ito, Y.; Kakinoki, M.; Sawada, T.; Saishin, Y.; Ohji, M. Comparison between wide-angle OCT angiography and ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography for detecting non-perfusion areas and retinal neovascularization in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2018, 256, 1275–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cui, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.C.; Lu, Y.; Zeng, R.; Katz, R.; Vingopoulos, F.; Le, R.; Laíns, I.; Wu, D.M.; et al. Comparison of widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography with ultra-widefield colour fundus photography and fluorescein angiography for detection of lesions in diabetic retinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 105, 577–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Meyer-Schwickerath, G.R. Ophthalmology and Photography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1968, 66, 1011–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dimmer, F.; Pillat, A. Atlas Photograpischer Bilder des Menschlichen Augenhintergrundes; F Deuticke: Leipzig, Germany, 1927. [Google Scholar]
  29. Silva, P.S.; Walia, S.; Cavallerano, J.D.; Sun, J.K.; Dunn, C.; Bursell, S.-E.; Aiello, L.M. Comparison of Low-Light Nonmydriatic Digital Imaging with 35-mm ETDRS Seven-Standard Field Stereo Color Fundus Photographs and Clinical Examination. Telemed. e-Health 2012, 18, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Silva, P.S.; Cavallerano, J.D.; Sun, J.K.; Soliman, A.Z.; Aiello, L.M.; Aiello, L.P. Peripheral Lesions Identified by Mydriatic Ultrawide Field Imaging: Distribution and Potential Impact on Diabetic Retinopathy Severity. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2587–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Silva, P.S.; Cavallerano, J.D.; Haddad, N.M.N.; Kwak, H.; Dyer, K.H.; Omar, A.F.; Shikari, H.; Aiello, L.M.; Sun, J.K. Peripheral Lesions Identified on Ultrawide Field Imaging Predict Increased Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy Progression over 4 Years. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kernt, M.; Hadi, I.; Pinter, F.; Seidensticker, F.; Hirneiss, C.; Haritoglou, C.; Kampik, A.; Ulbig, M.W.; Neubauer, A.S. Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Nonmydriatic Ultra-Widefield Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) Compared with ETDRS 7-Field Stereo Photography. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 2459–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Rasmussen, M.L.; Broe, R.; Frydkjaer-Olsen, U.; Olsen, B.S.; Mortensen, H.B.; Peto, T.; Grauslund, J. Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2015, 29, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Aiello, L.P.; Odia, I.; Glassman, A.R.; Melia, M.; Jampol, L.M.; Bressler, N.M.; Kiss, S.; Silva, P.S.; Wykoff, C.C.; Sun, J.K.; et al. Comparison of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Standard 7-Field Imaging with Ultrawide-Field Imaging for Determining Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019, 137, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Verma, A.; Indian Retina Research Associates (IRRA); Alagorie, A.R.; Ramasamy, K.; van Hemert, J.; Yadav, N.; Pappuru, R.R.; Tufail, A.; Nittala, M.G.; Sadda, S.R.; et al. Distribution of peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultra-wide field fundus imaging in diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 258, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ashraf, M.; Rageh, A.; Gilbert, M.; Tolls, D.; Fleming, A.; Souka, A.; El-Baha, S.; Cavallerano, J.D.; Sun, J.K.; Aiello, L.P.; et al. Factors Affecting Predominantly Peripheral Lesion Identification and Grading. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jacoba, C.M.P.; Ashraf, M.; Cavallerano, J.D.; Tolson, A.M.; Tolls, D.; Pellegrini, E.; Fleming, A.; Sun, J.K.; Aiello, L.P.; Silva, P.S. Association of Maximizing Visible Retinal Area by Manual Eyelid Lifting with Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity and Detection of Predominantly Peripheral Lesions When Using Ultra-Widefield Imaging. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022, 140, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sedova, A.; Hajdu, D.; Datlinger, F.; Steiner, I.; Neschi, M.; Aschauer, J.; Gerendas, B.S.; Schmidt-Erfurth, U.; Pollreisz, A. Comparison of early diabetic retinopathy staging in asymptomatic patients between autonomous AI-based screening and human-graded ultra-widefield colour fundus images. Eye 2022, 36, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bellmann, C.; Rubin, G.S.; Kabanarou, S.A.; Bird, A.C.; Fitzke, F.W. Fundus autofluorescence imaging compared with different confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 87, 1381–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Horie, S.; Kukimoto, N.; Kamoi, K.; Igarashi-Yokoi, T.; Yoshida, T.; Ohno-Matsui, K. Blue Widefield Images of Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Can Detect Retinal Ischemic Areas in Eyes with Diabetic Retinopathy. Asia-Pacific J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 10, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fujimoto, J.G.; Swanson, E.A. The Development, Commercialization, and Impact of Optical Coherence Tomography. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, OCT1–OCT13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Reznicek, L.; Klein, T.; Wieser, W.; Kernt, M.; Wolf, A.; Haritoglou, C.; Kampik, A.; Huber, R.; Neubauer, A.S. Megahertz ultra-wide-field swept-source retina optical coherence tomography compared to current existing imaging devices. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2014, 252, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ohno-Matsui, K.; Takahashi, H.; Mao, Z.; Nakao, N. Determining posterior vitreous structure by analysis of images obtained by AI-based 3D segmentation and ultrawidefield optical coherence tomography. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2021. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Takahashi, H.; Nakao, N.; Shinohara, K.; Sugisawa, K.; Uramoto, K.; Igarashi-Yokoi, T.; Yoshida, T.; Ohno-Matsui, K. Posterior vitreous detachment and paravascular retinoschisis in highly myopic young patients detected by ultra-widefield OCT. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Takahashi, H.; Uramoto, K.; Ohno-Matsui, K. Ultra-widefield optical coherence tomography for retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Retin. Cases Brief Rep. 2020, 16, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Spaide, R.F.; Fujimoto, J.G.; Waheed, N.K.; Sadda, S.R.; Staurenghi, G. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2018, 64, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chiku, Y.; Hirano, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Tuchiya, A.; Nakamura, M.; Murata, T. Evaluating posterior vitreous detachment by widefield 23-mm swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging in healthy subjects. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bakker, E.; Dikland, F.A.; van Bakel, R.; De Jesus, D.A.; Brea, L.S.; Klein, S.; van Walsum, T.; Rossant, F.; Farías, D.C.; Grieve, K.; et al. Adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy: A systematic review of vascular biomarkers. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2021, 67, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chui, T.Y.P.; Pinhas, A.; Gan, A.; Razeen, M.; Shah, N.; Cheang, E.; Liu, C.L.; Dubra, A.; Rosen, R.B.; Chui, Y.P.T. Longitudinal imaging of microvascular remodelling in proliferative diabetic retinopathy using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2016, 36, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wilkinson, C.; Ferris, F.; Klein, R.; Lee, P.; Agardh, C.D.; Davis, M.; Dills, D.; Kampik, A.; Pararajasegaram, R.; Verdaguer, J.T. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology 2003, 110, 1677–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Blair, N.P.; Shahidi, M.; Lai, W.W.; Zelkha, R. Correlation between microaneurysms and retinal thickness in diabetic macular edema. Retina 2008, 28, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Akil, H.; Karst, S.; Heisler, M.; Etminan, M.; Navajas, E.; Maberley, D. Application of optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: A comprehensive review. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 54, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. De Carlo, T.E.; Chin, A.T.; Filho, M.A.B.; Adhi, M.; Branchini, L.; Salz, D.A.; Baumal, C.R.; Crawford, C.; Reichel, E.; Witkin, A.J.; et al. Detection of microvascular changes in eyes of patients with diabetes but not clinical diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2015, 35, 2364–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Qin, S.; Zhang, C.; Qin, H.; Xie, H.; Luo, D.; Qiu, Q.; Liu, K.; Zhang, J.; Xu, G.; Zhang, J. Hyperreflective Foci and Subretinal Fluid Are Potential Imaging Biomarkers to Evaluate Anti-VEGF Effect in Diabetic Macular Edema. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 791442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cai, J.; Boulton, M. The pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy: Old concepts and new questions. Eye 2002, 16, 242–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ishibazawa, A.; De Pretto, L.R.; Alibhai, A.Y.; Moult, E.M.; Arya, M.; Sorour, O.; Mehta, N.; Baumal, C.R.; Witkin, A.J.; Yoshida, A.; et al. Retinal Nonperfusion Relationship to Arteries or Veins Observed on Widefield Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 4310–4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Nian, S.; Lo, A.C.Y.; Mi, Y.; Ren, K.; Yang, D. Neurovascular unit in diabetic retinopathy: Pathophysiological roles and potential therapeutical targets. Eye Vis. 2021, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Reddy, S.; Hu, A.; Schwartz, S.D. Ultra Wide Field Fluorescein Angiography Guided Targeted Retinal Photocoagulation (TRP). Semin. Ophthalmol. 2009, 24, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yonekawa, Y.; Modi, Y.S.; Kim, L.A.; Skondra, D.; Kim, J.E.; Wykoff, C.C. American Society of Retina Specialists Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Nonproliferative and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy without Diabetic Macular Edema. J. Vitr. Dis. 2020, 4, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lai, K.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, L.; Huang, C.; Zhong, X.; Gong, Y.; Li, L.; Xu, F.; Li, C.; Lu, L.; et al. Subthreshold Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation Using Endpoint Management Algorithm for Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Paired Controlled Pilot Prospective Study. Ophthalmic Res. 2020, 64, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fan, W.; Wang, K.; Falavarjani, K.G.; Sagong, M.; Uji, A.; Ip, M.; Wykoff, C.C.; Brown, D.M.; van Hemert, J.; Sadda, S.R. Distribution of Nonperfusion Area on Ultra-widefield Fluorescein Angiography in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema: DAVE Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 180, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fang, M.; Fan, W.; Shi, Y.; Ip, M.S.; Wykoff, C.C.; Wang, K.; Falavarjani, K.G.; Brown, D.M.; van Hemert, J.; Sadda, S.R. Classification of Regions of Nonperfusion on Ultra-widefield Fluorescein Angiography in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 206, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ehlers, J.P.; Jiang, A.C.; Boss, J.D.; Hu, M.; Figueiredo, N.; Babiuch, A.; Talcott, K.; Sharma, S.; Hach, J.; Le, T.K.; et al. Quantitative Ultra-Widefield Angiography and Diabetic Retinopathy Severity: An Assessment of Panretinal Leakage Index, Ischemic Index and Microaneurysm Count. Ophthalmology 2019, 126, 1527–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Antaki, F.; Coussa, R.G.; Mikhail, M.; Archambault, C.; Lederer, D.E. The prognostic value of peripheral retinal nonperfusion in diabetic retinopathy using ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 258, 2681–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Silva, P.S.; Liu, D.; Glassman, A.R.; Aiello, L.P.; Grover, S.; Kingsley, R.M.; Melia, M.; Sun, J.K.; Network, F.T.D.R. Assessment of fluorescein angiography nonperfusion in eyes with diabetic retinopathy using ultrawide field retinal imaging. Retina 2022, 42, 1302–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Russell, J.F.; Shi, Y.; Hinkle, J.W.; Scott, N.L.; Fan, K.C.; Lyu, C.; Gregori, G.; Rosenfeld, P.J. Longitudinal Wide-Field Swept-Source OCT Angiography of Neovascularization in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy after Panretinal Photocoagulation. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2018, 3, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Schaal, K.B.; Munk, M.R.; Wyssmueller, I.; Berger, L.E.; Zinkernagel, M.S.; Wolf, S. Vascular abnormalities in diabetic retinopathy assessed with swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography widefield imaging. Retina 2019, 39, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pichi, F.; Smith, S.D.; Abboud, E.B.; Neri, P.; Woodstock, E.; Hay, S.; Levine, E.; Baumal, C.R. Wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography for the detection of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 258, 1901–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, M.; Garg, I.; Miller, J.B. Wide Field Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Associated Lesions: A Review. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2021, 36, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gabr, H.; Chen, X.; Zevallos-Carrasco, O.M.; Viehland, C.; Dandrige, A.; Sarin, N.; Mahmoud, T.H.; Vajzovic, L.; Izatt, J.A.; Toth, C.A. Visualization from intraoperative swept-source microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography in vitrectomy for complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Retina 2018, 38, S110–S120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reddy, R.K.; Pieramici, D.J.; Gune, S.; Ghanekar, A.; Lu, N.; Quezada-Ruiz, C.; Baumal, C.R. Efficacy of Ranibizumab in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Nonperfusion in RIDE and RISE. Ophthalmology 2018, 125, 1568–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sun, J.K.; Lin, M.M.; Lammer, J.; Prager, S.; Sarangi, R.; Silva, P.S.; Aiello, L.P. Disorganization of the Retinal Inner Layers as a Predictor of Visual Acuity in Eyes with Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014, 132, 1309–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Das, R.; Spence, G.; Hogg, R.; Stevenson, M.; Chakravarthy, U. Disorganization of Inner Retina and Outer Retinal Morphology in Diabetic Macular Edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018, 136, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dimitriou, E.; Sergentanis, T.N.; Lambadiari, V.; Theodossiadis, G.; Theodossiadis, P.; Chatziralli, I. Correlation between Imaging Morphological Findings and Laboratory Biomarkers in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. J. Diabetes Res. 2021, 2021, 6426003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Szeto, S.K.; Hui, V.W.K.; Tang, F.Y.; Yang, D.; Sun, Z.H.; Mohamed, S.; Chan, C.K.M.; Lai, T.Y.Y.; Cheung, C. OCT-based biomarkers for predicting treatment response in eyes with centre-involved diabetic macular oedema treated with anti-VEGF injections: A real-life retina clinic-based study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 2021, 319587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Borrelli, E.; Grosso, D.; Barresi, C.; Lari, G.; Sacconi, R.; Senni, C.; Querques, L.; Bandello, F.; Querques, G. Long-Term Visual Outcomes and Morphologic Biomarkers of Vision Loss in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Anti-VEGF Therapy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 235, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lee, J.; Gil Moon, B.; Cho, A.R.; Yoon, Y.H. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of DME and Its Association with Anti-VEGF Treatment Response. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 2368–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Mané, V.; Dupas, B.; Gaudric, A.; Bonnin, S.; Pedinielli, A.; Bousquet, E.; Erginay, A.; Tadayoni, R.; Couturier, A. Correlation between cystoid spaces in chronic diabetic macular edema and capillary nonperfusion detected by optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2016, 36, S102–S110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hsieh, Y.-T.; Alam, M.N.; Le, D.; Hsiao, C.-C.; Yang, C.-H.; Chao, D.L.; Yao, X. OCT Angiography Biomarkers for Predicting Visual Outcomes after Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2019, 3, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shin, Y.U.; Lee, B.R.; Kim, S.; Lee, W.J. A Novel Noninvasive Detection Method for Retinal Nonperfusion Using Confocal Red-free Imaging. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 1447–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cicinelli, M.V.; Cavalleri, M.; Brambati, M.; Lattanzio, R.; Bandello, F. New imaging systems in diabetic retinopathy. Geol. Rundsch. 2019, 56, 981–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kim, Y.J.; Yeo, J.H.; Son, G.; Kang, H.; Sung, Y.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, J.-G.; Yoon, Y.H. Efficacy of intravitreal AFlibercept injection for Improvement of retinal Nonperfusion in diabeTic retinopathY (AFFINITY study). BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2020, 8, e001616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Cheung, N.; Donaghue, K.C.; Liew, G.; Rogers, S.L.; Wang, J.J.; Lim, S.-W.; Jenkins, A.J.; Hsu, W.; Lee, M.L.; Wong, T.Y. Quantitative Assessment of Early Diabetic Retinopathy Using Fractal Analysis. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Fan, W.-Y.; Fleming, A.; Robertson, G.; Uji, A.; Van Hemert, J.; Singer, M.; Sagong, M.; Ip, M.; Sadda, S.R. Fractal analysis of retinal vasculature in normal subjects on ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 13, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Fan, W.; Uji, A.; Wang, K.; Falavarjani, K.G.; Wykoff, C.C.; Brown, D.M.; Van Hemert, J.; Sagong, M.; Sadda, S.R.; Ip, M. Severity of diabetic macular edema correlates with retinal vascular bed area on ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography. Retina 2020, 40, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Fan, W.; Nittala, M.G.; Fleming, A.; Robertson, G.; Uji, A.; Wykoff, C.C.; Brown, D.M.; van Hemert, J.; Ip, M.; Wang, K.; et al. Relationship Between Retinal Fractal Dimension and Nonperfusion in Diabetic Retinopathy on Ultrawide-Field Fluorescein Angiography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 209, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fan, W.; Nittala, M.G.; Wykoff, C.C.; Brown, D.M.; Uji, A.; Van Hemert, J.; Fleming, A.; Robertson, G.; Sadda, S.R.; Ip, M. New biomarker quantifying the effect of anti-vegf therapy in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy on ultrawide field fluorescein angiography. Retina 2021, 42, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ashraf, M.; Cavallerano, J.; Sun, J.; Silva, P.; Aiello, L. Ultrawide Field Imaging in Diabetic Retinopathy: Exploring the Role of Quantitative Metrics. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Russell, J.F.; Flynn, H.W.; Sridhar, J.; Townsend, J.H.; Shi, Y.; Fan, K.C.; Scott, N.L.; Hinkle, J.W.; Lyu, C.; Gregori, G.; et al. Distribution of Diabetic Neovascularization on Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography and on Simulated Widefield OCT Angiography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 207, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Goh, J.K.H.; Cheung, C.; Sim, S.S.; Tan, P.C.; Tan, G.S.W.; Wong, T.Y. Retinal Imaging Techniques for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2016, 10, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Cheung, C.Y.; Tang, F.; Ting, D.S.W.; Tan, G.S.W.; Wong, T.Y. Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Eye Disease Screening. Asia-Pacific J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 8, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Balyen, L.; Peto, T. Promising Artificial Intelligence-Machine Learning-Deep Learning Algorithms in Ophthalmology. Asia-Pacific J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 8, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ting, D.S.; Peng, L.; Varadarajan, A.V.; Keane, P.A.; Burlina, P.M.; Chiang, M.F.; Schmetterer, L.; Pasquale, L.R.; Bressler, N.M.; Webster, D.R.; et al. Deep learning in ophthalmology: The technical and clinical considerations. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2019, 72, 100759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lakshminarayanan, V.; Kheradfallah, H.; Sarkar, A.; Balaji, J.J. Automated Detection and Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Comprehensive Survey. J. Imaging 2021, 7, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jimenez-Carmona, S.; Alemany-Marquez, P.; Alvarez-Ramos, P.; Mayoral, E.; Aguilar-Diosdado, M. Validation of an Automated Screening System for Diabetic Retinopathy Operating under Real Clinical Conditions. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Falavarjani, K.G.; Wang, K.; Khadamy, J.; Sadda, S.R. Ultra-wide-field imaging in diabetic retinopathy; an overview. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 2016, 28, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Terasaki, H.; Sonoda, S.; Shiihara, H.; Kakiuchi, N.; Funatsu, R.; Shirasawa, M.; Sakamoto, T. More effective screening for epiretinal membranes with multicolor scanning laser ophthalmoscope than with color fundus photographs. Retina 2020, 40, 1412–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, Z.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, S. Multicolor Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Strengthens Surgeons’ Preoperative Decision-Making and Intraoperative Performance on Epiretinal Membrane. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Song, J.H.; Moon, K.Y.; Jang, S.; Moon, Y. Comparison of MultiColor fundus imaging and colour fundus photography in the evaluation of epiretinal membrane. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 97, e533–e539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Muftuoglu, I.K.; Bartsch, D.-U.; Barteselli, G.; Gaber, R.; Nezgoda, J.; Freeman, W.R. Visualization of macular pucker by multicolor scanning laser imaging. Retina 2018, 38, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Roy, R.; Saurabh, K.; Thomas, N.R.; Chowdhury, M.; Shah, D.K. Validation of Multicolor Imaging of Diabetic Retinopathy Lesions Vis a Vis Conventional Color Fundus Photographs. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2019, 50, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pieczynski, J.; Kuklo, P.; Grzybowski, A. The Role of Telemedicine, In-Home Testing and Artificial Intelligence to Alleviate an Increasingly Burdened Healthcare System: Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2021, 10, 445–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Rajalakshmi, R.; Subashini, R.; Anjana, R.M.; Mohan, V. Automated diabetic retinopathy detection in smartphone-based fundus photography using artificial intelligence. Eye 2018, 32, 1138–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bellemo, V.; Lim, Z.W.; Lim, G.; Nguyen, Q.D.; Xie, Y.; Yip, M.Y.T.; Hamzah, H.; Ho, J.; Lee, X.Q.; Hsu, W.; et al. Artificial intelligence using deep learning to screen for referable and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy in Africa: A clinical validation study. Lancet Digit. Health 2019, 1, e35–e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Diagnostics 12 01684 g001 550
Figure 1. Ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus or OCT images of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy of 74-year-old woman. (A): UWF image of Mirante, (B): UWF OCT of Canon S1.
Figure 1. Ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus or OCT images of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy of 74-year-old woman. (A): UWF image of Mirante, (B): UWF OCT of Canon S1.
Diagnostics 12 01684 g001
Diagnostics 12 01684 g002 550
Figure 2. Posterior fundus and macular OCT images of diabetic macular edema of 62-year-old woman. (A): Synthesized color SLO image of Mirante, (B): Swept-source OCT of Mirante.
Figure 2. Posterior fundus and macular OCT images of diabetic macular edema of 62-year-old woman. (A): Synthesized color SLO image of Mirante, (B): Swept-source OCT of Mirante.
Diagnostics 12 01684 g002
Diagnostics 12 01684 g003 550
Figure 3. (A): Multicolor widefield SLO image of the right fundus of a 65-year-old man with PDR. (B): Blue SLO image shows a hyporeflective area in the mid-periphery to periphery of the fundus, indicating non-perfused areas. (C): Widefield FA image shows widespread NPAs extensively with dye leakage from new vessels. (D): Magnified image of image (B) shows hyporeflective areas in the lower temporal quadrant. (E): Magnified FA image of image (C) shows NPAs in the same quadrant of image (D). All figures above are Mirante (NIDEK, Japan) images.
Figure 3. (A): Multicolor widefield SLO image of the right fundus of a 65-year-old man with PDR. (B): Blue SLO image shows a hyporeflective area in the mid-periphery to periphery of the fundus, indicating non-perfused areas. (C): Widefield FA image shows widespread NPAs extensively with dye leakage from new vessels. (D): Magnified image of image (B) shows hyporeflective areas in the lower temporal quadrant. (E): Magnified FA image of image (C) shows NPAs in the same quadrant of image (D). All figures above are Mirante (NIDEK, Japan) images.
Diagnostics 12 01684 g003
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of ultra-widefield ophthalmoscopy.
Table 1. Characteristics of ultra-widefield ophthalmoscopy.
Fundus Ophthalmoscopy/CameraOptos (Optos Plc)Mirante (NIDEK)Clarus (Carl Zeiss)
Maximum field of view200°163°133°
Without mydriasisYesYesYes
Light sourcesLaser (red and green)Laser (red, green, and blue)LED (red, green, and blue)
MultimodalityFA, ICGA, FAF, OCTFA, ICGA, FAF, Retromode, OCT, OCTAFA, FAF
FeaturesWidest field MutlimodalityColor reality
LED: light emitting diode, FA: Fluorescein angiography, ICGA: Indocyanin green angiography, FAF: Fundus autofluorescence, OCT: optical coherence tomography, OCTA: OCT angiography.
Table
Table 2. Clinical applications of imaging methods to any stages of diabetic retinopathy.
Table 2. Clinical applications of imaging methods to any stages of diabetic retinopathy.
Less than Mild NPDRModerate/Severe NPDRPDRDME
Biomicroscopy
(contact or non-contact lens)		SHHH
Color photography
(1 or 2-field, 30/45°)		SSLH
Color photography
(7-field of 30°)		SSSS
UWF color (>100°)LHHL
FA (30/45°)NSHH
UWF FA (>100°)NHHL
OCTSHHH
WF OCTA (12 mm × 12 mm)NHHL
NPDR: Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, PDR: Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, DME: Diabetic macular edema, FA: Fluorescein angiography, UWF: Ultra-widefield, OCT: optical coherence tomography, OCTA: OCT angiography, Applicability—N: No, L: Low, S: Substantial, H: High.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Horie, S.; Ohno-Matsui, K. Progress of Imaging in Diabetic Retinopathy—From the Past to the Present. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1684. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071684

AMA Style

Horie S, Ohno-Matsui K. Progress of Imaging in Diabetic Retinopathy—From the Past to the Present. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(7):1684. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071684

Chicago/Turabian Style

Horie, Shintaro, and Kyoko Ohno-Matsui. 2022. "Progress of Imaging in Diabetic Retinopathy—From the Past to the Present" Diagnostics 12, no. 7: 1684. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071684

APA Style

Horie, S., & Ohno-Matsui, K. (2022). Progress of Imaging in Diabetic Retinopathy—From the Past to the Present. Diagnostics, 12(7), 1684. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071684

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop