Next Article in Journal
The Role of CRP POC Testing in the Fight against Antibiotic Overuse in European Primary Care: Recommendations from a European Expert Panel
Previous Article in Journal
Standardized Uptake Values on SPECT/CT: A Promising Alternative Tool for Treatment Evaluation and Prognosis of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumours
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Significance of Maximum Intensity Projection Method for Diagnostic Imaging of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

1
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, 280 Sakuranosato, Ibarakimachi 311-3193, Japan
2
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mito Clinical Education and Training Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, 3-2-7 Miya-Machi, Mito 310-0015, Japan
3
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan
4
Baseball and Sports Clinic, 2-228-1 Kosugi, Park City Musashikosugi the Garden Towers West 1st Floor W4, Nakahara-Ward, Kawasaki 211-0063, Japan
5
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ami 300-0395, Japan
6
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kikkoman General Hospital, Noda 278-0005, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(2), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020319
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 12 January 2023 / Published: 15 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to use the magnetic resonance imaging maximum-intensity projection (MRI-MIP) method for diagnostic imaging of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and to investigate the stricture ratios of the subclavian artery (SCA), subclavian vein (SCV), and brachial plexus bundle (BP). A total of 113 patients with clinically suspected TOS were evaluated. MRI was performed in a position similar to the Wright test. The stricture was classified into four grades. Then, the stricture ratios of the SCA, SCV, and BP in the sagittal view were calculated by dividing the minimum diameter by the maximum diameter of each structure. Patients were divided into two groups: surgical (n = 22) and conservative (n = 91). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. The stricture level and ratio in the SCV were significantly higher in the surgical group, while the stricture level and the ratio of SCA to BP did not show significant differences between the two groups. The MRI-MIP method may be helpful for both subsidiary and severe diagnoses of TOS.

1. Introduction

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is probably more common than is believed, especially among young people. Diagnosing TOS is difficult because no reliable mechanical examination has been shown [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. However, TOS has a wide variety of symptoms, and its pathogenesis is still debated. The diagnosis of TOS is also dependent on various evoked tests, and a classification of disputed neurogenic TOS has been proposed [8,9,10,11,12]. Patients with no abnormal findings on electrophysiological examination but with a variety of subjective symptoms are difficult to diagnose, and cases suspected to have TOS may actually be diagnosed with hysterical paralysis. One possible method, although not very reliable, to diagnose disputed neurogenic TOS is a medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction study [13,14]. Imaging tests such as 3D-CT angiography, 3D-MR angiography, brachial plexus angiography, and angiography are used to visualize stenotic areas in blood vessels and nerves [15,16,17,18,19,20]; however, these cause problems related to radiation exposure and the use of contrast media. In this study, we report the application of the maximum intensity projection (MIP) method in MRI, which is well known for the depiction of the cerebral vasculature, and its use in the diagnosis of TOS. MIP is used to represent the highest intensity values along one axis of a three-dimensional volume in a two-dimensional (2D) image, allowing rapid interpretation of the entire volume based on this 2D projection (Figure 1A,B). The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of the MIP method for TOS. We also classified the degree of stenosis in the subclavian artery (SCA), subclavian vein (SCV), and brachial plexus and calculated the stricture rate to evaluate the usefulness of MRI-MIP images in the diagnosis of TOS.

2. Materials and Methods

This study included 113 patients (60 men and 53 women) with clinically suspected TOS who underwent MRI-MIP at our hospital from May 2014 to March 2021, consecutively. The patients had an average age of 32.5 (14–67) yr. The institutional review board of the University of Tsukuba Hospital approved this study (Study Number: NO 22-44). Subjective symptoms varied from pain, numbness, and lethargy in the upper limbs and fingers to tenderness in the oblique interosseous muscle, intercostal space, or pectoralis minor tendon area. Patients with positive Roos test, Wright test, Adson test, or Eden test results were included in this study.
MRI was performed using a clinical 3 Tesla machine (Magneton Skyra 3T, Siemens, Berlin, Germany). The patients were placed in a supine position with the upper limb raised further than that in the Wright test position (Figure 2A). Imaging was performed with the upper limb and trunk firmly fixed with a whole-body coil and bandages (Figure 2B). The imaging conditions were as follows: 3D-STIR with a slice thickness of 1.3 m; FOV, 380 mm; TR/TE, 387/50; matrix, 320 × 256; and flip angle, 120°. A special pulse monitor was attached to the healthy index finger to synchronize imaging with the heartbeat. The subclavian arteries (SCA) and subclavian veins (SCV) were reconstructed using MIP and evaluated in the intercostal space.
The degree of SCA and SCV stenosis in MRI-MIP images were classified into four grades: grade 0 = no stenosis; grade 1 = stenosis < 50% of the maximum diameter of the SCA or SCV; grade 2 = stenosis > 50% of the maximum diameter of the SCA or SCV; and grade 3 = stenosis to the point of interruption (Figure 3). On the second evaluation, we used proton-density-weighted (PDW) sagittal images to quantitatively evaluate the stricture rate of the SCA, SCV, and nerve bundle at the costovertebral gap. The stricture rate was calculated by dividing the minimum diameter (a) of each SCA, SCV, and nerve bundle in the PDW sagittal image by the maximum diameter (b) as follows: (1 − a/b) × 100 (Figure 4). A slice in which the first rib was the longest in a plate-like shape was used as the reference position. The maximum and minimum diameters were measured in the area where the first rib was located. The stricture grade and rate of SCA, SCV, and nerve bundle were statistically compared.
A total of 22 patients underwent surgery (first rib resection), and 91 successfully underwent conservative treatment. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Indications for surgery were defined as patients who were clinically diagnosed with TOS, refractory to conservative treatment such as oral medication and rehabilitation, or who requested surgery. In addition, only some cases from both groups were compared in terms of the stenosis rate between the affected and normal sides. None of the patients had symptoms on the healthy side, and only those cases for which data were available were included in this study.

3. Results

A total of 22 patients (13 men and 9 women) belonged to the surgical group, with a mean age of 34.8 yr (14–56 yr), and 91 patients (47 men and 44 women) in the conservative group, with a mean age of 33.0 yr (15–67 yr). No significant differences were reported in the demographic profile between the two groups. The main indications for surgery were sports such as baseball in six cases, numbness and pain in the upper limbs that persisted for many years in twelve cases, and a strong cold sensation in addition to numbness in the hands in four cases. The background characteristics of the patients in the surgical group are shown in Table 1. The average duration of illness was 4.6 yr (2–15 yr). A total of three cases were arterial TOS, while the other cases involved neurogenic TOS. Patient satisfaction after surgery at the final follow-up was excellent in seven cases, good in thirteen cases, fair in two cases, and no case was classified as unsatisfactory.
Table 2 shows the breakdown of SCA and SCV stricture grades in MRI-MIP images. The SCV showed a significantly stronger stricture in the surgery group (p < 0.01), whereas the SCA showed more grade 0 patients without stricture in both groups, showing no difference between the two groups (p = 0.33).
The mean stricture rates of SCA, SCV, and nerve bundle were 34.6%, 76.7%, and 34.5% in the surgical group, and 28%, 67.7%, and 34.5% in the conservative group. There was a significantly higher stricture rate in the surgery group for SCV (p = 0.036). In contrast, the SCA (p = 0.21) and nerve bundle stenosis rates (p = 0.53) did not differ between the two groups (Table 3).
In a comparative study of the affected and normal sides, there were seven and 24 cases in the surgical and conservative groups, respectively (Table 4). A trend was reported towards greater strictures on the affected side of the SCA in the surgery group (p = 0.064). However, no significant differences were found in other endpoints between the affected and normal sides.

Representative Case

A 40-year-old man presented with weakness in the right upper limb. He has been experiencing lethargy of the right upper limb for five years, which was aggravated by running. He worked as a researcher, and his symptoms worsened three months ago, making it difficult for him to handle a pipette. He was diagnosed with right TOS by his local doctor and referred to our hospital. He had numbness in the right fingertips, epidermal avulsion of the fingertips, and nail deformity (Figure 5A). The Roos and Wright test results were positive. He was limited to 20 s in the Roos test due to numbness and sluggishness in his right arm, and his hand turned pale. Radiography showed no cervical ribs, while MRI-MIP image and 3D-CT angiography showed stenosis of the SCA (grade 1) and SCV (grade 3) in the intercostal space (Figure 6A,B,D). The patient opted to undergo surgery; hence, first rib resection using the transaxial approach [7] was performed. Postoperatively, numbness in the right upper extremity decreased, and skin lesions on the tips of the fingers improved after three months (Figure 5B). Limping of the upper extremities during running also disappeared. One year after surgery, the MRI-MIP images showed no stenosis of the SCA (grade 0), and the sagittal section showed that the anterior scalene muscle, which was in contact with the SCA before surgery, had disappeared (Figure 6C,E).

4. Discussion

In this study, MRI-MIP imaging showed that the stricture rate of the SCV reflected the severity of TOS, whereas the stricture of the SCA and nerve bundles was independent of severity, despite the absence of venous TOS. The application of MRI-MIP imaging in the diagnosis of TOS has been reported in only one case by Esposito et al. [21]. Zhang et al. described the usefulness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of TOS in 27 cases [22]. Hardy et al. investigated the accuracy of MRI diagnosis in 48 TOS cases and reported its usefulness [23]. This study evaluated 113 MRI-MIP images, making it the largest survey conducted to date.
With the increasing resolution of MRI, it has become possible to evaluate the pathophysiology of TOS in a minimally invasive, non-contrast-enhanced method, which was previously considered difficult. On the other hand, Furushima et al. reported that the maximum systolic blood flow velocity and the distance between the bases of the oblique muscle triangles on the first rib on ultrasonography reflected the severity of the disease [7]. Ultrasound is less invasive, but there are still problems in terms of procedural reproducibility and accuracy [24]. There are also cases of TOS with no obvious upper extremity or back pain, and they may not develop characteristic clinical symptoms [3,14].
A comprehensive diagnosis of TOS, which is a complex disease, requires a detailed medical history, assessment of clinical symptoms, and neurological examination. Hence, the presence of SCV disconnection on MRI-MIP images does not necessarily lead to the diagnosis of venous TOS, and there have been cases in which SCA stenosis was not observed on MRI-MIP images despite the presence of symptoms of SCA stenosis. The cases included in this study did not include “True TOS” [10,14], which is difficult to diagnose using MRI alone. However, disputed neurogenic TOS may be effective in excluding false positives. Apart from cases clearly attributable to sports, the absence of any vascular stenosis on MRI-MIP images in cases of suspected cervical spine origin or psychological cases is unlikely to indicate severe TOS requiring surgery. MRI-MIP images are useful in daily practice because they can be visually explained to the patients themselves. Moreover, when combined with sagittal and axial images taken simultaneously, as in Figure 4, it is possible to pick up the bone and soft tissue abnormalities and inflammation of the brachial plexus. However, if only MIP is used, only blood vessels can be detected.
In surgery, 3D-CT angiography is more useful than MRI because of its short imaging time to determine the position of the blood vessels in relation to the clavicle and ribs. However, it is difficult to perform this procedure in all patients with suspected TOS considering the use of contrast media and exposure to radiation. In this study, SCVs in surgical cases that were considered more severely stenosed showed a higher stenosis rate. Therefore, it is recommended that 3D-CT angiography be performed only in cases in which surgery is clinically indicated to avoid the unnecessary use of contrast media and exposure to radiation.
As to the cause of stenosis, the SCA, SCV, and nerve bundles are often stenosed even in the normal position, depending on the imaging position, as shown in previous studies in comparison to the normal side. In reviewing our surgical cases, most of the stenoses were caused by fibrous bands of the anterior scalene muscle and other anatomical factors [18,19]. In comparison with the healthy side, only the SCA in the surgery group tended to show strong stenosis, suggesting that anatomical factors of the anterior scalene muscle may be considered in cases in which there is a difference between the normal and affected sides of the SCA, which is less affected by posture. Moreover, the comparison with normal cases is warranted.
This study has two major limitations, which include the imaging of limb position and diagnosis of severity. The MRI imaging position was supine, and although the patient was in the Wright test position, there is a high likelihood that the SCA was not adequately compressed owing to high intravascular pressure and strong elasticity. The SCV also had a non-physiological compression and was not considered to fully reflect stenosis in the actual examination technique. Another problem with this method is that the patient must be in a symptomatic position for at least 20 min during imaging. Regarding TOS severity, in this study, surgical cases were compared with conservative treatment cases as severe. However, because surgery was decided solely based on the patient’s subjective assertion, it may not reflect severe organic stenosis, which may have caused variation in the data. Since the TOS itself lacks a clear quantitative index, further studies are needed to accumulate more cases in the future. In addition, other factors need to be considered for future study, which include cost-effectiveness, utility, indications for use, homogenization of sample size, and the ability to rule out other diagnoses.

5. Conclusions

On MRI-MIP images, the degree of stenosis of the SCV and SCA was classified into four grades, and the SCV was significantly more severely stenosed in the operated cases. Sagittal section images of the SCV, SCA, and nerve bundle showed significantly greater stenosis of the SCV in the operated cases but no significant difference in the SCA or nerve bundle between the operated and conservative treatment cases. MRI-MIP may be a useful adjunctive diagnostic method for understanding the stenosis status of vascular nerve bundles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.O. and N.M.; methodology, T.O.; software, T.O.; formal analysis, T.O.; investigation, T.O., S.O., N.M., T.M. and K.I.; resources, T.O., S.O. and N.M.; data curation, T.O.; writing—original draft preparation, T.O.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y.; visualization, T.O. and S.O.; supervision, N.M. and Y.Y.; project administration, Y.Y. and M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Mito Clinical Education and Training Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Mito Kyodo General Hospital (IRB No:22–44, approved 6 December 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Katsuhiko Kobayashi and Takuya Hirochi, a radiology technician, and other members of the radiology department at Mito Kyodo General Hospital for their cooperation in MRI imaging.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ruopsa, N.; Ristolainen, L.; Vastamäki, M.; Vastamäki, H. Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome with Supraclavicular Release: Long-Term Outcome without Rib Resection. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Povlsen, S.; Povlsen, B. Diagnosing Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Current Approaches and Future Directions. Diagnostics 2018, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kuhn, J.E.; Lebus, G.F.; Bible, J.E. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2015, 23, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Peek, J.; Vos, C.G.; Ünlü, Ç.; van de Pavoordt, H.D.W.M.; van den Akker, P.J.; de Vries, J.-P.P. Outcome of Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2017, 40, 303–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Beteck, B.; Shutze, W.; Richardson, B.; Shutze, R.; Tran, K.; Dao, A.; Ogola, G.O.; Pearl, G. Comparison of Athletes and Nonathletes Undergoing Thoracic Outlet Decompression for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2018, 54, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Burks, S.S.; Wolfe, E.M.; Yoon, J.W.; Levi, A.D. Supraclavicular Resection of a Cervical Rib Causing Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Oper. Neurosurg. 2020, 19, E520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Furushima, K.; Funakoshi, T.; Kusano, H.; Miyamoto, A.; Takahashi, T.; Horiuchi, Y.; Itoh, Y. Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Approach for First Rib Resection in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Arthrosc. Sport. Med. Rehabil. 2021, 3, e155–e162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ransom, E.F.; Minton, H.L.; Young, B.L.; He, J.K.; Ponce, B.A.; McGwin, G.; Meyer, R.D.; Brabston, I.E.W. Intermediate and Long-Term Outcomes Following Surgical Decompression of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in an Adolescent Patient Population. Hand 2020, 17, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perchoc, A.; Andro, C.; Letissier, H.; Schiele, P.; Le Nen, D. Long-term functional outcomes after surgical treatment of nonspecific thoracic outlet syndrome: Retrospective study of 70 cases at a mean of 8 years’ follow-up. Hand Surg. Rehabil. 2019, 38, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wilbourn, A.J. Thoracic outlet syndrome is over diagnosed. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ferrante, M.A.; Ferrante, N.D. The thoracic outlet syndromes: Part 2. The arterial, venous, neurovascular, and disputed thoracic outlet syndromes. Muscle Nerve 2017, 56, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Masocatto, N.O.; Da-Matta, T.; Prozzo, T.G.; Couto, W.J.; Porfirio, G. Thoracic outlet syndrome: A narrative review. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2019, 46, e20192243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seror, P. Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction study, a new tool to demonstrate mild lower brachial plexus lesions. A report of 16 cases. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115, 2316–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sonoo, M. Thoracic outlet syndrome. Brain Nerve 2014, 66, 1429–1439. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Remy-Jardin, M.; Remy, J.; Masson, P.; Bonnel, F.; Debatselier, P.; Vinckier, L.; Duhamel, A. Helical CT Angiography of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000, 174, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Demondion, X.; Herbinet, P.; Van Sint Jan, S.; Boutry, N.; Chantelot, C.; Cotten, A. Imaging Assessment of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Radiographics 2006, 26, 1735–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Likes, K.; Rochlin, D.H.; Call, D.; Freischlag, J.A. Coexistence of Arterial Compression in Patients With Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. JAMA Surg. 2014, 149, 1240–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sanders, R.J.; Annest, S.J. Thoracic outlet and pectoralis minor syndromes. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2014, 27, 86–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raptis, C.A.; Sridhar, S.; Thompson, R.W.; Fowler, K.; Bhalla, S. Imaging of the Patient with Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Radiographics 2016, 36, 984–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ersoy, H.; Steigner, M.L.; Coyner, K.B.; Gerhard-Herman, M.D.; Rybicki, F.J.; Bueno, R.; Nguyen, L.L. Vascular Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Protocol Design and Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography and Equilibrium Phase Imaging on 1.5- and 3-T MRI Scanners. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012, 198, 1180–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Esposito, M.D.; Arrington, J.A.; Blackshear, M.N.; Murtagh, F.R.; Silbiger, M.L. Thoracic outlet syndrome in a throwing athlete diagnosed with MRI and MRA. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1997, 7, 598–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, T.; Xu, Z.; Chen, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, T.; Hu, Y.; Shen, L.; Xue, F. A Novel Approach for Imaging of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Using Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CE-MRA), Short Inversion Time Inversion Recovery Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions (T2-STIR-SPACE), and Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination (VIBE). Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 7617–7623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hardy, A.; Pougès, C.; Wavreille, G.; Behal, H.; Demondion, X.; Lefebvre, G. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2019, 105, 1563–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brownie, E.R.; Abuirqeba, A.A.; Ohman, J.W.; Rubin, B.G.; Thompson, R.W. False-negative upper extremity ultrasound in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected subclavian vein thrombosis due to thoracic outlet syndrome (Paget-Schroetter syndrome). J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2020, 8, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. MRI-MIP display from the chest to the upper arm. (A) Raised right arm. (B) Raised left arm. MRI-MIP, magnetic resonance imaging maximum-intensity projection.
Figure 1. MRI-MIP display from the chest to the upper arm. (A) Raised right arm. (B) Raised left arm. MRI-MIP, magnetic resonance imaging maximum-intensity projection.
Diagnostics 13 00319 g001
Figure 2. MRI imaging limb position. (A) The patient is placed in a supine position with the upper limb further elevated than in the Wright test position. (B) The upper extremities from the trunk are secured. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2. MRI imaging limb position. (A) The patient is placed in a supine position with the upper limb further elevated than in the Wright test position. (B) The upper extremities from the trunk are secured. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Diagnostics 13 00319 g002
Figure 3. The degree of stenosis of SCA and SCV is classified into 4 levels. Upper row (dotted arrow), a stenosis part of SCA. Lower row (solid line arrow), a stenosis part of SCV. Grade 0; no stenosis. Grade 1; mild stenosis, less than 50%. Grade 2; moderate stenosis, more than 50%. Grade 3; severe stenosis to the point of discontinuity. SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Figure 3. The degree of stenosis of SCA and SCV is classified into 4 levels. Upper row (dotted arrow), a stenosis part of SCA. Lower row (solid line arrow), a stenosis part of SCV. Grade 0; no stenosis. Grade 1; mild stenosis, less than 50%. Grade 2; moderate stenosis, more than 50%. Grade 3; severe stenosis to the point of discontinuity. SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Diagnostics 13 00319 g003
Figure 4. Left sagittal view. (A) The SCV (star), SCA (asterisk), and nerve bundle (dot line) are shown. (B) Scout view of MRI-MIP image. (C) SCA, SCV, and nerve bundle diameter measurements (arrows). MRI-MIP, magnetic resonance imaging maximum-intensity projection; SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Figure 4. Left sagittal view. (A) The SCV (star), SCA (asterisk), and nerve bundle (dot line) are shown. (B) Scout view of MRI-MIP image. (C) SCA, SCV, and nerve bundle diameter measurements (arrows). MRI-MIP, magnetic resonance imaging maximum-intensity projection; SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Diagnostics 13 00319 g004
Figure 5. Skin manifestations of the right fingers: (A) preoperative finding; (B) postoperative finding.
Figure 5. Skin manifestations of the right fingers: (A) preoperative finding; (B) postoperative finding.
Diagnostics 13 00319 g005
Figure 6. Preoperative and postoperative images. (A) Preoperative MRI-MIP image showing grade 1 stenosis of the SCA (arrow). (B) Preoperative 3D-CT angiography showing stenosis from below at the site where the SCA meets the clavicle (arrow). (C) Postoperative MRI-MIP image revealing stenosis of SCA disappeared and identified as grade 0 (arrowhead). (D) Preoperative sagittal view shows that the anterior scalene muscle is in contact with the SCA, and the SCV is disrupted. (E) Preoperative sagittal view shows that the first rib was resected, and the anterior scalene muscle, which was in contact with the SCA, was absent. Stenosis of the SCV remained. MRI-MIP, magnetic resonance imaging maximum-intensity projection; SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Figure 6. Preoperative and postoperative images. (A) Preoperative MRI-MIP image showing grade 1 stenosis of the SCA (arrow). (B) Preoperative 3D-CT angiography showing stenosis from below at the site where the SCA meets the clavicle (arrow). (C) Postoperative MRI-MIP image revealing stenosis of SCA disappeared and identified as grade 0 (arrowhead). (D) Preoperative sagittal view shows that the anterior scalene muscle is in contact with the SCA, and the SCV is disrupted. (E) Preoperative sagittal view shows that the first rib was resected, and the anterior scalene muscle, which was in contact with the SCA, was absent. Stenosis of the SCV remained. MRI-MIP, magnetic resonance imaging maximum-intensity projection; SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Diagnostics 13 00319 g006
Table 1. Background of patients in the surgery group.
Table 1. Background of patients in the surgery group.
Age at SurgeryAffected SideCause or OccupationSymptomDuration of Illness (Years)Classification of TOSCo-Morbid Disease or SymptomSatisfaction after Surgery
137LBaseballNumbness after throwing2Disputed neurogenic Good
215RBaseballNumbness after throwing2Disputed neurogenic Good
341RBaseballNumbness after throwing4Disputed neurogenic Good
417RBaseballNumbness after throwing2Disputed neurogenicUCL injury of same side elbowExcellent
520RBaseballNumbness after throwing2Disputed neurogenic Good
619RBaseballNumbness after throwing3Disputed neurogenic Good
714RTennisNumbness and pain2Disputed neurogenic Excellent
840RReseaercherCold sensation and numbness5ArterialSkin lesion of fingers, upper limb weaknessExcellent
943LOffice workerCold sensation and numbness3ArterialNumbness after joggingExcellent
1015RMalformation of first ribCold sensation and numbness2ArterialMalformation of first ribExcellent
1156LService industryCold sensation and numbness6Disputed neurogenicPost operation of cervical stenosisGood
1232LTraffic accidentNumbness and pain2Disputed neurogenic Fair
1348RService industryNumbness and pain6Disputed neurogenic Excellent
1447RNurseNumbness and pain5Disputed neurogenic Good
1522LOffice workerNumbness and pain3Disputed neurogenic Good
1651LCare workerNumbness and pain15Disputed neurogenicPost operation of same side cubital tunnel syndromeGood
1726LService industryNumbness and pain4Disputed neurogenic Good
1824RService industry Numbness and pain4Disputed neurogenic Excellent
1955LConstruction industryNumbness and pain4Disputed neurogenic Fair
2053LForestry industryNumbness and pain5Disputed neurogenic Good
2144L/RUnemployedNumbness and pain10Disputed neurogenicPost operation of cervical stenosisGood
TOS, thoracic outlet syndrome.
Table 2. Breakdown of SCV and SCA stenosis grade in MRI-MIP images.
Table 2. Breakdown of SCV and SCA stenosis grade in MRI-MIP images.
Grade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3p-Value
SCVSurgery
(n = 22)
Conservative
(n = 91)
0

5
3

35
4

20
15

31
0.0113
SCASurgery
(n = 22)
Conservative
(n = 91)
11

59
7

22
2

8
2

2
0.33
MRI-MIP, magnetic resonance imaging maximum-intensity protection; SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Table 3. Stenosis rates of SCV, SCA, and nerve bundle.
Table 3. Stenosis rates of SCV, SCA, and nerve bundle.
Surgery (%)
n = 22
Conservative (%)
n = 91
p-Value
SCV76.767.70.036
SCA34.6280.21
Nerve bundle34.534.50.53
SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Table 4. Stricture rate of SCV, SCA, and nerve bundle on surgery and conservative group. There was a trend toward greater stenosis on the affected side of the SCA in the surgery group.
Table 4. Stricture rate of SCV, SCA, and nerve bundle on surgery and conservative group. There was a trend toward greater stenosis on the affected side of the SCA in the surgery group.
Surgery (n = 7)
Conservative (n = 24)
Affected SideNormal Sidep-Value
SCVSurgery
Conservative
66.7
67.1
74.4
66.9
0.20
0.47
SCASurgery
Conservative
47.4
29.3
28.5
32.5
0.064
0.28
Nerve bundleSurgery
Conservative
46.0
74.8
40.3
71.2
0.24
0.36
SCA, subclavian artery; SCV, subclavian vein.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ogawa, T.; Onishi, S.; Mamizuka, N.; Yoshii, Y.; Ikeda, K.; Mammoto, T.; Yamazaki, M. Clinical Significance of Maximum Intensity Projection Method for Diagnostic Imaging of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020319

AMA Style

Ogawa T, Onishi S, Mamizuka N, Yoshii Y, Ikeda K, Mammoto T, Yamazaki M. Clinical Significance of Maximum Intensity Projection Method for Diagnostic Imaging of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(2):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ogawa, Takeshi, Shinzo Onishi, Naotaka Mamizuka, Yuichi Yoshii, Kazuhiro Ikeda, Takeo Mammoto, and Masashi Yamazaki. 2023. "Clinical Significance of Maximum Intensity Projection Method for Diagnostic Imaging of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome" Diagnostics 13, no. 2: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020319

APA Style

Ogawa, T., Onishi, S., Mamizuka, N., Yoshii, Y., Ikeda, K., Mammoto, T., & Yamazaki, M. (2023). Clinical Significance of Maximum Intensity Projection Method for Diagnostic Imaging of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Diagnostics, 13(2), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020319

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop