Normal Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Assessment Using Postmortem Computed Tomography (PMCT)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Measurements
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, J.; Valentine, D.; Ebraheim, N.A. Management of Syndesmosis Injury: A Narrative Review. Orthop. Res. Rev. 2022, 14, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chun, D.I.; Cho, J.H.; Min, T.H.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, J.H.; Won, S.H. Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiologic Methods for Ankle Syndesmosis Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tansey, P.J.; Chen, J.; Panchbhavi, V.K. Current Concepts in Ankle Fractures. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma 2023, 45, 102260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zalavras, C.; Thordarson, D. Ankle Syndesmotic Injury. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2007, 15, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahn, T.K.; Choi, S.M.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, W.C. Isolated Syndesmosis Diastasis: Computed Tomography Scan Assessment with Arthroscopic Correlation. Arthroscopy 2017, 33, 828–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubik, J.F.; Rollick, N.C.; Bear, J.; Diamond, O.; Nguyen, J.T.; Kleeblad, L.J.; Helfet, D.L.; Wellman, D.S. Assessment of Malreduction Standards for the Syndesmosis in Bilateral Ct Scans of Uninjured Ankles. Bone Jt. J. 2021, 103, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeung, T.W.; Chan, C.Y.; Chan, W.C.; Yeung, Y.N.; Yuen, M.K. Can Pre-Operative Axial Ct Imaging Predict Syndesmosis Instability in Patients Sustaining Ankle Fractures? Seven Years’ Experience in a Tertiary Trauma Center. Skelet. Radiol. 2015, 44, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dikos, G.D.; Heisler, J.; Choplin, R.H.; Weber, T.G. Normal Tibiofibular Relationships at the Syndesmosis on Axial Ct Imaging. J. Orthop. Trauma 2012, 26, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, S.; Malhotra, K.; Cullen, N.P.; Singh, D.; Goldberg, A.J.; Welck, M.J. Defining Reference Values for the Normal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis in Adults Using Weight-Bearing Ct. Bone Jt. J. 2019, 101, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chandy, P.E.; Murray, N.; Khasanova, E.; Nasir, M.U.; Nicolaou, S.; Macri, F. Postmortem Ct in Trauma: An Overview. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2020, 71, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steenburg, S.D.; Spitzer, T.; Rhodes, A. Post-Mortem Computed Tomography Improves Completeness of the Trauma Registry: A Single Institution Experience. Emerg. Radiol. 2019, 26, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nault, M.L.; Hébert-Davies, J.; Laflamme, G.Y.; Leduc, S. Ct Scan Assessment of the Syndesmosis: A New Reproducible Method. J. Orthop. Trauma 2013, 27, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beumer, A.; Swierstra, B.A. The Influence of Ankle Positioning on the Radiography of the Distal Tibial Tubercles. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2003, 25, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sora, M.C.; Strobl, B.; Staykov, D.; Förster-Streffleur, S. Evaluation of the Ankle Syndesmosis: A Plastination Slices Study. Clin. Anat. 2004, 17, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lepojärvi, S.; Pakarinen, H.; Savola, O.; Haapea, M.; Sequeiros, R.B.; Niinimäki, J. Posterior Translation of the Fibula May Indicate Malreduction: Ct Study of Normal Variation in Uninjured Ankles. J. Orthop. Trauma 2014, 28, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Proisy, M.; Marchand, A.J.; Loget, P.; Bouvet, R.; Roussey, M.; Pelé, F.; Rozel, C.; Treguier, C.; Darnault, P.; Bruneau, B. Whole-Body Post-Mortem Computed Tomography Compared with Autopsy in the Investigation of Unexpected Death in Infants and Children. Eur. Radiol. 2013, 23, 1711–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uthandi, D.; Sabarudin, A.; Mohd, Z.; Rahman, M.A.A.; Karim, M.K.A. Effectiveness of Post-Mortem Computed Tomography (Pmct) in Comparison with Conventional Autopsy: A Systematic Review. Curr. Med. Imaging 2020, 16, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rater 1 | Rater 2 | ICC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Estimate | Lower | Upper | |
Fibular rotation (°) | 8.33 ± 3.43 | 7.96 ± 3.74 | 0.7537 | 0.6525 | 0.8254 |
Sagittal translation (mm) | 1.53 ± 0.45 | 1.13 ± 0.82 | 0.4285 | 0.0886 | 0.629 |
Incisura depth (mm) | 3.76 ± 0.83 | 3.81 ± 0.91 | 0.8765 | 0.8256 | 0.9125 |
Total (N = 131) | Male (N = 66) | Female (N = 65) | p-Value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Median (IQR) | Range (Min to Max) | Mean ± SD | Median (IQR) | Range (Min to Max) | Mean ± SD | Median (IQR) | Range (Min to Max) | ||
Fibular rotation (°) | 8.14 ± 3.22 | 7.83 (6.12, 10.5) | −0.4 to 16.6 | 8.43 ± 3.24 | 8.05 (6.76, 10.91) | −0.4 to 16.6 | 7.85 ± 3.2 | 7.38 (5.22, 10.43) | 2.3 to 15.43 | 0.3003 |
Sagittal translation (mm) | 1.33 ± 0.54 | 1.27 (0.94, 1.56) | 0.33 to 3.49 | 1.54 ± 0.6 | 1.47 (1.15, 1.73) | 0.33 to 3.49 | 1.11 ± 0.35 | 1.02 (0.89, 1.29) | 0.61 to 2.46 | <0.001 |
Incisura depth (mm) | 3.78 ± 0.82 | 3.75 (3.21, 4.42) | 1.89 to 6.05 | 3.77 ± 0.95 | 3.73 (3, 4.49) | 1.89 to 6.05 | 3.8 ± 0.67 | 3.77 (3.38, 4.24) | 2.49 to 5.12 | 0.8311 |
Mean ± SD | Range (Min to Max) | Maximum Variability | |
---|---|---|---|
Fibular rotation (°) | −1.12 ± 3.2 | −10.45 to 7.95 | −0.57 |
Sagittal translation (mm) | 0.14 ± 0.69 | −2.31 to 2.18 | 0.26 |
Incisura depth (mm) | 0.18 ± 0.81 | −2.17 to 2.64 | 0.32 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, J.; Park, J.-H.; Kwon, H.-W.; Lee, M.; Kim, D.; Choi, Y.-J.; Park, K.-R.; Lee, S.; Cho, J. Normal Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Assessment Using Postmortem Computed Tomography (PMCT). Diagnostics 2024, 14, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010036
Kim J, Park J-H, Kwon H-W, Lee M, Kim D, Choi Y-J, Park K-R, Lee S, Cho J. Normal Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Assessment Using Postmortem Computed Tomography (PMCT). Diagnostics. 2024; 14(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010036
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Jahyung, Jeong-Hyun Park, Hyung-Wook Kwon, Mijeong Lee, Digud Kim, Yu-Jin Choi, Kwang-Rak Park, Sookyoung Lee, and Jaeho Cho. 2024. "Normal Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Assessment Using Postmortem Computed Tomography (PMCT)" Diagnostics 14, no. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010036
APA StyleKim, J., Park, J. -H., Kwon, H. -W., Lee, M., Kim, D., Choi, Y. -J., Park, K. -R., Lee, S., & Cho, J. (2024). Normal Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Assessment Using Postmortem Computed Tomography (PMCT). Diagnostics, 14(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010036