Next Article in Journal
The Importance of Topographical Recognition of Pulmonary Arteries in Diagnostics and Treatment of CTEPH, Based on an Analysis of a Dissected Case Model—A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Cine-Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Mediastinal Masses with Uncertain/Equivocal Findings from Pre-Operative Computed Tomography Scanning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Maxillary Sinuses in Ancient Crania Dated to the V–VI Centuries BCE from Opi (Italy): Volumetric Measurements in Ancient Skulls from the Necropolis of Opi, Abruzzi, Italy

1
Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
2
Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University ‘G. D’Annunzio’ of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
3
Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(15), 1683; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151683 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 June 2024 / Revised: 19 July 2024 / Accepted: 22 July 2024 / Published: 3 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Twenty ancient crania dated to the V–VI centuries from the necropolis of Opi, Abruzzi, Italy, were analysed. A 3D analysis of the maxillary sinuses of these ancient crania was performed. The aims of this paper were two: to compare the linear and volumetric measurements of the left and right maxillary sinuses and to determine the facial measurements in the same sample (the upper facial height, the bizygomatic width, and the palatal length).

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) can provide precise information about complex anatomical structures as it is characterised by rapid volumetric image acquisition with high resolution. The aim of this study was to provide measurements for 20 ancient skulls of the Samnite people found in the necropolis of Opi, a small and isolated mountain village in Abruzzo, a region in central Italy. All the images (left and right) of the 20 ancient skulls from Opi were acquired. All the data are the property of the Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry of G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, and different parameters (area and volume) were measured and evaluated. The mean and standard deviation of the facial measurements were also calculated. All the data were subjected to statistical analysis. CBCT scan data of 20 fossil skulls did not show significant values regarding the MS area and the volume between the right and left sides. In the ancient skulls, no difference was found between the right and left sides.

1. Introduction

The maxillary sinuses (MSs) are the biggest paranasal sinuses, also named the “antrum of Highmore” after being described by an English anatomist, Nathaniel Highmore, in 1651 [1]. Leonardo da Vinci described the maxillary sinuses for the first time in 1489, drawing them as symmetrical, pyramid-shaped cavities in the left and right maxillary bones [2].
A similar link between MS size and head circumference has been discovered in the fetal development of the human species [3].
Knowledge of the anatomy and growth of the orofacial complex is indispensable for formulating diagnoses and treatment plans in orthodontics [4].
Growth of the orofacial complex can be defined as a set of growth processes with different timing and modalities and modulated by functional stimuli generated by soft tissues according to Moss’s Functional Matrix Theory, which sees functional adaptation as the most influential mechanism in the architecture of the facial skeleton [5]. Growth is, therefore, a multifactorial process regulated by genetic, neurological, and hormonal factors placed under the influence of functions (breathing, swallowing, chewing, phonetics, etc.) and proceeds in three fundamental moments: ossification, direct and indirect organisation (defined as the ability of the various anatomical structures to grow in a harmonious relationship with the others), and functional adaptation [6].
Bone remodelling promotes MS expansion, which is closely related to maxillary development [7]. The MSs grow at the expense of maxillary processes due to the physiological process of maxillary pneumatisation [8].
The MSs tend to appear at the end of the second embryonic month and are completed by 18 to 20 years [9,10].
The shape and size of the MS varies amongst individuals, between genders, and in various populations [11]. The MSs stabilise after the second decade of life in women and in the third decade in men [12].
Most studies have shown no change in sinus volume with dentition status and a decrease in volume with advancing age [13].
Considering the complex structure of the MS, diagnostic methods like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are used as the gold standard to evaluate the actual anatomy of the sinuses [14]. However, their use is limited by high cost, radiation dose, and restricted accessibility. With the introduction of CBCT, these drawbacks have been overcome [15].
The volume of the MS is typically 15 cc; however, this value may be correlated with age, gender, and ethnicity [16]. Furthermore, MS volume could fluctuate due to tooth loss or absence [17]. Identifying precise linear and volumetric measurements for the MSs is clinically essential as part of the diagnostic phase before various treatment procedures. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been widely used to assess MS anatomy, particularly before dental implant rehabilitation [18].
The MS is an important anatomical structure with significant demographic variability. The first aim of this paper was to compare the linear and volumetric measurements of the left and right MSs; the second aim was to determine the facial measurements in the same sample: the upper facial height, the bizygomatic width, and the palatal length.
Since the literature on this subject is minimal, the current study was performed to determine the linear and volumetric measurements of the maxillary sinuses with CBCT for a sample of a population from the same geographic area to obtain a reliable result. This paper examines the maxillary sinuses due to the high variability among the various hominin taxa.
T studies could be conducted on the topic, comparing the ancient skulls with those of the current population of the town of Opi to know the evolution of the paranasal sinuses in the same local population.

2. Materials and Methods

The present paper retrospectively determined the volume of the MSs in 20 ancient fossil crania from the same necropolis in Opi.
Opi is an Italian town of 379 inhabitants in the province of L’Aquila in Abruzzo. The town is included in the protected area of the Lazio and Molise National Park in Abruzzo.
The archaeological excavations conducted in 1994 and 1996 at the entrance of the Fondillo Valley have brought to light a necropolis. The necropolis was composed of more than 153 inhumation tombs, most of them arranged in a circle and therefore reproducing the family clans to which they belonged. The entire site was dated around the V-VI centuries BCE and includes burials of individuals of different sex and age who died at different times and being bearers of distinct social roles and economic status.
This research was conducted on well-preserved skull fossils from the Samnite population found in the archaeological site of Opi (V–VI centuries BCE) [19].
The Samnites were an ancient Italic people settled in the southcentral area of the peninsula. The historical region of Samnio, corresponding to part of the current regions of Abruzzo, Molise, Campania, and some marginal areas of Lazio, Puglia, and Basilicata, takes its name from this population.
The Samnites mainly practiced pastoralism and agriculture. The territory in which they were settled was mountainous and poor in resources. They were also good warriors who often clashed with the Romans for the supremacy of the territory.
Among the many wars supported by the Samnites, those against the Romans marked their disappearance and their end as a tribal entity.
The analysis of skeletal and dental epigenetic traits under strong genetic control and benign neoplasias with a hereditary component made it possible to deduce that the men buried in the same funerary circle shared a kinship relationship, as reported by Viciano et al. [20]. The biological homogeneity of the Samnite population was related to the presence of strong endogamic clans or family groups due to the area being isolated by the mountains where they lived for a long time [21] (Figure 1).
The ancient Opi skulls are preserved in the National Archaeological Museum of Abruzzo, located in Chieti, Abruzzo, Italy. It was possible here, under authorisation from the University of Chieti, to select the skulls suitable for research and falling within the inclusion criteria. The recruitment period ran from July to September 2023. In this period, it was possible to select skulls suitable for the research, carry out the CBCT scans in the Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, G. D’Annunzio University of ChietiPescara, and proceed with the measurements.
All the data included in this work are the property of G. D’Annunzio University of ChietiPescara. The studies adhered to the European Union Good Practice Rules according to the Helsinki Declaration. An independent ethics committee approved the protocol (number 23) in the Hospital of Chieti.

2.1. Participants

The sample comprised 20 adult skulls of the Samnite population found in the necropolis of Opi (V–VI centuries BCE) to ensure a homogeneous sample in terms of ethnicity.
The following inclusion criteria were applied:
  • Skulls from the necropolis of Opi;
  • Good state of conservation of the skulls;
  • Presence of a complete denture.
Exclusion criteria were midfacial injuries, skeletal system anomalies, and missing teeth. Additionally, scans displaying MSs with unilateral abnormalities were excluded from the investigation.

2.2. CBCT Scans

A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was taken with the same equipment under the same conditions.
CBCT can visualise and provide precise information about teeth and surrounding complex anatomical structures as it is characterised by rapid volumetric image acquisition with high resolution and low radiation dose levels [22].
All CBCT exams were performed with a low-dose protocol (FOV of 240 × 190, acquisition time of 15 s, 80 kV, 5 mA, 35 μSv) using the Planmeca Promax® 3D MID unit (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) [23].
All the skulls examined with the CBCT technique were oriented in a natural head position (NHP), a reproducible and physiological head posture in space. The skulls were stabilised with ear rods in the external auditory meatus to obtain the NHP [24].
The CBCT data acquired were managed with Dolphin Imaging 3D software 12.0 (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA, USA), which permitted an additional head orientation on the front, right, and left views. The MS measurements were correctly performed using the widgets present in the software.
CBCT is a three-dimensional exam that allows for a more accurate morphometric analysis compared to two-dimensional exams such as latero-lateral teleradiography of the head. The accuracy of the CBCT scans allowed us to detect radiographically the boundaries of the MSs.

2.3. Facial Measurements

The skull analysis started with detecting three linear measurements of the face, and the values are reported in Table 1.
The facial measurements included the upper facial height, the bizygomatic width, and the palatal length.
Upper facial height (Figure 2) is a linear measurement that indicates the distance from the nasion to the prosthion and is measured with a straight compass.
The nasion is the meeting point of the median sagittal plane with the nasofrontal suture. The prosthion is the most protruding point of the superior alveolar process (a few mm above the superior infradentale). The prosthion must be precisely identified as it is often confused with the upper infradentale.
Bizygomatic width (Figure 2) is a linear measurement that indicates the distance between the two “zighion” points and is calculated using a curved compass. The zighion is the most prominent point on the external surface of the zygomatic arch.
Palatal length (Figure 3) is a linear measurement that indicates the projective distance between the “oral” and the “stafilion” and is measured with a straight-branched compass. The oral is the anterior point of the hole of the anterior palatine duct. The stafilion is located on the apex of the palatine spine.

2.4. Maxillary Sinus Measurement and Volume Determination

In the CBCT images, it was possible to visualise and measure the volume of the maxillary sinuses and their area in all three planes of space (Figure 4).

2.5. Error Method

This work’s reliability was improved by randomly analysing and selecting all the CBCT images. At most, 10 scans/die were checked to reduce the risk of inaccurate analysis due to fatigue. Two different observers checked all the data twice and performed all linear and volumetric measurements; in case of disagreement, a third operator was consulted to reduce intraoperator and interoperator errors. Cohen’s* Kappa determined the reliability and showed a strong significant agreement (k = 0.84) between the measurements performed by the two observers.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

The statistical analysis regarding the facial measurements was performed using the KolmogorovSmirnov test of normality.
The data analysis started with a t-test, which did not yield reliable results.
The ShapiroWilk and JarqueBera tests were used to verify the presence of a symmetric and normal distribution of the data. Both the JarqueBera test and the ShapiroWilk test returned negative results. This implies that the distribution of observations (of the samples) significantly deviates from the Gaussian distribution.
The non-parametric statistical Wilcoxon test was used to compare two paired samples. This test is particularly useful when the data do not meet the normality assumptions required for parametric tests.
The Wilcoxon test was repeated for four sets of measurements: volumes of the right and left maxillary sinuses and their respective measurements along the three axes of space at their maximum extent.
The null hypothesis (H0) of the Wilcoxon test states that there is no statistical difference between the means of the two samples. In contrast, the alternative hypothesis (H1) suggests a significant statistical difference. The significance level (α) was set at 0.05 to support the alternative hypothesis (H1); if the p-value is lower than the chosen significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected. If the p-value is higher than the significance level, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

3. Results

3.1. Facial Measurements

The mean upper facial height is 62.57 (SD = 6.678883). The value of the K-S test statistic (D) is 0.1409. The p-value is 0.77154. The data do not differ significantly from those which are normally distributed.
The mean bizygomatic width is 128.765 (SD = 5.451053). The value of the K-S test statistic (D) is 12,794. The p-value is 0.85841. The data do not differ significantly from those which are normally distributed.
The mean palatal length is 45.385 (SD = 4.552648). The value of the K-S test statistic (D) is 11639. The p-value is 0.9207. The data do not differ significantly from those which are normally distributed.

3.2. Volumes of the Left and Right Maxillary Sinuses

The differences between the left and right MS volumes reported in Table 2 are not statistically significant (p-value = 0.7368).

3.3. Linear Measurement along the Sagittal Axis of the Left and Right Maxillary Sinuses

The differences between the sagittal sizes of the left and right MSs reported in Table 3 are considered not statistically significant (p-value = 0.5256).

3.4. Linear Measurement along the Transverse Axis of the Left and Right Maxillary Sinuses

The differences between the transversal sizes of the left and right MSs reported in Table 4 are considered not statistically significant (p-value = 0.4897).

3.5. Linear Measurement along the Vertical Axis of the Left and Right Maxillary Sinuses

The differences between the transversal sizes of the left and right MSs reported in Table 5 are considered not statistically significant (p-value = 0.6950).

4. Discussion

Recently, CBCT has been more and more useful for descriptive and quantitative analysis of postnatal growth and development of the paranasal sinus [25].
Given the limited size of the sample, for which the central limit theorem does not hold, the JarqueBera and ShapiroWilk tests were used to assess the sample distribution. However, both tests yielded negative results. This indicates that the distribution of observations in the sample significantly deviates from the normal or Gaussian distribution. In other words, the nature of the data distribution does not align with the expectations of statistical normality.
This finding is noteworthy as the JarqueBera and ShapiroWilk tests are commonly employed to check for data normality. In this paper, the negative outcomes of both tests suggests that the data distribution in the sample does not follow the typical bell-shaped curve of a normal distribution. Therefore, the non-parametric statistical Wilcoxon test was calculated considering the constraints arising from the small sample size and the non-normality of the distribution.
This research compared the right and the left MSs in the 20 fossil crania discovered in the necropolis of Opi, in the middle of Italy, and did not find asymmetry between the left MS and right MS, contrary to what has been reported in the literature, where the difference between left and right MSs has usually been detected in modern individuals in terms of length and width; some authors found a suitable MS bigger than the left MS and vice versa, and other ones did not find this asymmetry in humans [26,27].
In 2010, the same population from Opi was previously examined in a paper focused on maxillary and mandibular base size. A significant difference was found by Festa et al. for the maxillary length, which was more important in the fossil cranium. The mandible was shorter in modern individuals but without significant differences compared to ancient skulls. These measurements were computed on lateral cephalograms [28].
As found in 2011, in a paper focused on the skeletal robusticity of the Samnites from Alfedena (Aq), men showed higher lateralisation, likely due to weapon training and a preferential use of the dominant arm. Alfedena men were three times more lateralised than modern Euroamericans, with values between professional tennis players and Palaeolithic hunters [29].
The maxillary sinus shape is significantly influenced by the changes in craniofacial morphology seen during the development of Hominidae.
The growth pattern of the MSs in the Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) has a structural role in the skull architecture, and a tight relationship was also demonstrated between MS volume and external cranial dimensions by Koppe et al.
As found by Buck et al., the MS volume in our species and H. sapiens was significantly smaller. It resulted in hypopneumatisation when compared to its closest congeners and other taxa [30].
Sinuses have a thermoregulatory role, and sinus volume decreases in cold temperatures.
The MSs in Eskimo populations were studied, and the analysis revealed strong correlations with the climate; in fact, MS volume in Eskimo populations decreases in colder areas [31].
Few similar studies have been conducted in the literature. Evteev et al. (2019) found a strong association between the form of the nasal cavity and climate across 15 populations of East Asian origin inhabiting the Far East, Siberia, Alaska, and Greenland [32].
Butaric et al. (2015) affirmed that nasal cavity size and shape are vital in air conditioning processes using CBCT in modern human crania from nine different geographic areas [33].
CBCT could be a promising technique for the sex and age determination of ancient skulls by analysing paranasal volume and size due to excellent resolution [34].

5. Conclusions

In none of the four cases did H1 occur. Therefore, there is no significant difference between the left and right maxillary sinuses regarding volume and individual measurements along the space axes.
Maxillary sinus measurements can aid in forensic anthropology to evaluate changes in the maxillary sinus area with human evolution over time.
Despite the limitations of the present research, the findings highlighted the anatomic variability in the MS.
Further studies with larger CBCT images recruiting all age and ethnic groups will be recommended for more information on the population initially from Opi.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., R.D., S.B. and F.F.; methodology, M.M., R.D., S.B. and F.F.; validation M.M. and F.F.; formal analysis, M.M.; investigation, M.M. and F.F.; resources, M.M. data curation, M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M.; visualization, M.M.; supervision, M.M.; project administration, M.M.; funding acquisition F.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The clinical data for the patients included in this study were reviewed and approved by an independent ethics committee (number 23) in the Hospital of Chieti on 8 November 2018.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects or the legally authorised representatives recruited in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to legal reasons.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mathis, S.; Le Masson, G.; Soulages, A.; Duval, F.; Carla, L.; Vallat, J.M.; Solé, G. Olfaction and anosmia: From ancient times to COVID-19. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 425, 117433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schuez, I.; Alt, K.W. Leonardo da Vinci and dental anatomy. J. Anat. 2022, 240, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Przystańska, A.; Kulczyk, T.; Rewekant, A.; Sroka, A.; Jończyk-Potoczna, K.; Gawriołek, K.; Czajka-Jakubowska, A. The association between maxillary sinus dimensions and midface parameters during human postnatal growth. Biomed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 6391465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arriagada-Vargas, C.; Abeleira-Pazos, M.T.; Outumuro-Rial, M.; García-Mato, E.; Varela-Aneiros, I.; Limeres-Posse, J.; Diniz-Freitas, M. Rare disorders: Diagnosis and therapeutic planning for patients seeking orthodontic treatment. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kaur, G.; Kumari, G.; Sharma, S. Functional Matrix Hypothesis: A Review of Literature. Surf. Plasmon Reson. 2021, 1, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maréchal, L.; Heuzé, Y. Interaction Between Environmental Temperature and Craniofacial Morphology in Human Evolution: A Focus on Upper Airway; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bozhikova, E.; Uzunov, N. Morphological Aspects of the Maxillary Sinus. In Paranasal Sinuses Anatomy and Conditions; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, S. Three-Dimensional Variation in Maxillary Sinus Anatomy: Implications for Health Disparities in Sinonasal Disease. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  9. Whyte, A.; Boeddinghaus, R. The maxillary sinus: Physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2019, 48, 20190205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gulec, M.; Tassoker, M.; Magat, G.; Lale, B.; Ozcan, S.; Orhan, K. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis of the maxillary sinus: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Folia Morphol. 2020, 79, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Aktuna Belgin, C.; Colak, M.; Adiguzel, O.; Akkus, Z.; Orhan, K. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2019, 276, 1493–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska, D.; Kociemba, W.; Rewekant, A.; Sroka, A.; Jończyk-Potoczna, K.; Patelska-Banaszewska, M.; Przystańska, A. Development of the maxillary sinus from birth to age 18. Postnatal growth pattern. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015, 79, 1393–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lovasova, K.; Kachlik, D.; Rozpravkova, M.; Matusevska, M.; Ferkova, J.; Kluchova, D. Three-dimensional CAD/CAM imaging of the maxillary sinus in ageing process. Ann. Anat. 2018, 218, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Andersen, T.N.; Darvann, T.A.; Murakami, S.; Larsen, P.; Senda, Y.; Bilde, A.; Buchwald, C.v.; Kreiborg, S. Accuracy and precision of manual segmentation of the maxillary sinus in MR images—A method study. Br. J. Radiol. 2018, 91, 20170663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Urooge, A.; Patil, B.A. Sexual Dimorphism of Maxillary Sinus: A Morphometric Analysis using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, ZC67–ZC70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Katti, G.; Shahbaz, S.; Katti, C.; Rahman, M.S. The relationship between the roots and furcation of the maxillary first molar to the maxillary sinus: A cone-beam computed tomography study. J. Indian Acad. Oral Med. Radiol. 2018, 30, 260–264. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sah, S.; Rungta, M. Volumetric measurement of maxillary sinus volume by MDCT. Int. J. Radiol. Diagn. Imaging 2022, 5, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weiss, R.; Read-Fuller, A. Cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: An evidence-based review. Dent. J. 2019, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Icaro, I.; Alemán, I.; Viciano, J. Stable Isotopes Unveil Dietary Trends in the Samnite and Peligni Communities of Opi Val Fondillo and Sulmona S. Lucia (V–VI Centuries BCE, Abruzzo, Central Italy). Biology 2023, 12, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Viciano, J.; D’Anastasio, R.; Capasso, L. Odontometric sex estimation on three populations of the Iron Age from Abruzzo region (central–southern Italy). Arch. Oral Biol. 2015, 60, 100–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Faustoferri, A. Prima dei Sanniti. Le necropoli dell’Abruzzo meridionale. Mélanges De Française De Rome 2003, 115, 85–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feragalli, B.; Rampado, O.; Abate, C.; Macrì, M.; Festa, F.; Stromei, F.; Caputi, S.; Guglielmi, G. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: Technique improvement and low-dose protocols. La Radiol. Medica 2017, 122, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Macrì, M.; Rendina, F.; Feragalli, B.; Pegreffi, F.; Festa, F. Prevalence of Ponticulus Posticus and Migraine in 220 Orthodontic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biology 2023, 12, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Macrì, M.; Medori, S.; Varvara, G.; Festa, F. A Digital 3D Retrospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Root Control during Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maspero, C.; Farronato, M.; Bellincioni, F.; Annibale, A.; Machetti, J.; Abate, A.; Cavagnetto, D. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus changes in growing subjects: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Materials 2020, 13, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koppe, T.; Nagai, H. Growth pattern of the maxillary sinus in the Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata): Reflections on the structural role of the paranasal sinuses. J. Anat. 1997, 190, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ariji, Y.; Kuroki, T.; Moriguchi, S.; Ariji, E.; Kanda, S. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: A study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 1994, 23, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Festa, F.; Capasso, L.; D’Anastasio, R.; Anastasi, G.; Festa, M.; Caputi, S.; Tecco, S. Maxillary and mandibular base size in ancient skulls and of modern humans from Opi, Abruzzi, Italy: A cross-sectional study. World J. Orthop. 2010, 11, e1–e4. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sparacello, V.S.; Pearson, O.M.; Coppa, A.; Marchi, D. Changes in skeletal robusticity in an iron age agropastoral group: The samnites from the Alfedena necropolis (Abruzzo, Central Italy). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2011, 144, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Buck, L.T.; Stringer, C.B.; MacLarnon, A.M.; Rae, T.C. Variation in paranasal pneumatisation between Mid-Late Pleistocene hominins. Bull. Et Mémoires De La Société D’anthropologie De Paris 2019, 31, 14–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shea, B.T. Eskimo craniofacial morphology, cold stress and the maxillary sinus. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1977, 47, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Evteev, A.A.; Grosheva, A.N. Nasal cavity and maxillary sinuses form variation among modern humans of Asian descent. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2019, 169, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rae, T.C.; Viðarsdottir, U.S.; Jeffery, N.; Steegmann, A.T., Jr. Developmental response to cold stress in cranial morphology of Rattus: Implications for the interpretation of climatic adaptation in fossil hominins. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 273, 2605–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Demiralp, K.O.; Cakmak, S.K.; Aksoy, S.; Bayrak, S.; Orhan, K.; Demir, P. Assessment of paranasal sinus parameters according to ancient skulls’ gender and age by using cone-beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol. 2019, 78, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Geolocalisation (in red) of Opi (Aq) in Italy.
Figure 1. Geolocalisation (in red) of Opi (Aq) in Italy.
Diagnostics 14 01683 g001
Figure 2. Upper facial height and bizygomatic width.
Figure 2. Upper facial height and bizygomatic width.
Diagnostics 14 01683 g002
Figure 3. Palatal length.
Figure 3. Palatal length.
Diagnostics 14 01683 g003
Figure 4. CBCT detection of maximum linear measurement along the sagittal axis, transversal axis, and vertical axis.
Figure 4. CBCT detection of maximum linear measurement along the sagittal axis, transversal axis, and vertical axis.
Diagnostics 14 01683 g004
Table 1. Facial measurements.
Table 1. Facial measurements.
Upper Facial Height
(mm)
Bizygomatic Width
(mm)
Palatal Length
(mm)
OPI T1463.2137.446.9
OPI T2254.9125.243.7
OPI T3156.4128.644.7
OPI T3459.2129.240.7
OPI T3757.3139.945.6
OPI T4163.8122.843.1
OPI T4763.6129.543.1
OPI T5778.6128.842.6
OPI T5966.7129.346.2
OPI T6056.7132.844.6
OPI T6371.8127.840.3
OPI T6466.9120.038.8
OPI T6554.9126.640.2
OPI T7653.8124.546.8
OPI T8664.2116.748.7
OPI T8770.0130.048.5
OPI T9069.4134.242.0
OPI T9162.6132.953.4
OPI T9562.3131.155.8
OPI T10455.1128.052.0
Table 2. Volumes of the left and right maxillary sinuses.
Table 2. Volumes of the left and right maxillary sinuses.
Left MS Volume (mm3)Right MS Volume (mm3)
OPI T1433,17528,840
OPI T2221,72722,039
OPI T3121,34421,486
OPI T3419,26918,687
OPI T3724,45125,155
OPI T4123,59420,474
OPI T4722,84522,016
OPI T5721,29922,071
OPI T5918,61517,529
OPI T6014,07115,288
OPI T6321,12512,491
OPI T6419,08321,482
OPI T6514,48513,944
OPI T7625,85226,975
OPI T8620,57719,302
OPI T8721,60326,149
OPI T9015,02416,873
OPI T9123,51320,745
OPI T9518,72616,873
OPI T10421,72726,264
Table 3. Linear measurements along the sagittal axis of the left and right maxillary sinuses.
Table 3. Linear measurements along the sagittal axis of the left and right maxillary sinuses.
Left (mm)Right (mm)
OPI 1415141357
OPI 2210781196
OPI 318951067
OPI 3410751097
OPI 3711291274
OPI 4112801102
OPI 4711841147
OPI 5711521135
OPI 5911221148
OPI 60932947
OPI 631097741
OPI 6410001093
OPI 65768882
OPI 7611931276
OPI 861124999
OPI 879101120
OPI 9010151033
OPI 9112161171
OPI 9510971033
OPI 10410781294
Table 4. Linear measurements along the transverse axis of the left and right maxillary sinuses.
Table 4. Linear measurements along the transverse axis of the left and right maxillary sinuses.
Left (mm)Right (mm)
OPI 1410201057
OPI 22760668
OPI 31673780
OPI 34730722
OPI 37815834
OPI 41842737
OPI 47823785
OPI 57825891
OPI 59600562
OPI 60449514
OPI 63656419
OPI 64757745
OPI 65572507
OPI 76911857
OPI 86840792
OPI 87737898
OPI 90645652
OPI 91799703
OPI 95721652
OPI 104760885
Table 5. Linear measurements along the vertical axis of the left and right maxillary sinuses.
Table 5. Linear measurements along the vertical axis of the left and right maxillary sinuses.
Left (mm)Right (mm)
OPI 141035873
OPI 22890830
OPI 31867764
OPI 34709737
OPI 37898852
OPI 41941841
OPI 47760795
OPI 57735811
OPI 59793721
OPI 60600712
OPI 63904621
OPI 64742860
OPI 65637594
OPI 76836924
OPI 86687665
OPI 87964996
OPI 90576671
OPI 91799767
OPI 95652671
OPI 104890915
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Festa, F.; D’Anastasio, R.; Benazzi, S.; Macrì, M. Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Maxillary Sinuses in Ancient Crania Dated to the V–VI Centuries BCE from Opi (Italy): Volumetric Measurements in Ancient Skulls from the Necropolis of Opi, Abruzzi, Italy. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151683

AMA Style

Festa F, D’Anastasio R, Benazzi S, Macrì M. Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Maxillary Sinuses in Ancient Crania Dated to the V–VI Centuries BCE from Opi (Italy): Volumetric Measurements in Ancient Skulls from the Necropolis of Opi, Abruzzi, Italy. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(15):1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151683

Chicago/Turabian Style

Festa, Felice, Ruggero D’Anastasio, Stefano Benazzi, and Monica Macrì. 2024. "Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Maxillary Sinuses in Ancient Crania Dated to the V–VI Centuries BCE from Opi (Italy): Volumetric Measurements in Ancient Skulls from the Necropolis of Opi, Abruzzi, Italy" Diagnostics 14, no. 15: 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151683

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop