Next Article in Journal
Comparing New Smartphone-Connected Handheld Ultrasound Device vs. Traditional Ultrasound in Vitreo-Retinal Disease Diagnosis
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of a New and Effective Marker Combination for a Standardized and Automated Bin-Based Basophil Activation Test (BAT) Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Parathyroid Adenoma Detected in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT but Not in the Dedicated Imaging Modalities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterizing Normal Upper Extremity Lymphatic Flow with 99mTc In-House Dextran: A Retrospective Study

by
Wiroj Katiyarangsan
1,2,
Putthiporn Charoenphun
1,3,
Krisanat Chuamsaamarkkee
1,3,
Suchawadee Musikarat
1,
Kidakorn Kiranantawat
4,
Chaninart Sakulpisuti
1,
Kanungnij Thamnirat
1,
Arpakorn Kositwattanarerk
1,
Chanika Sritara
1 and
Wichana Chamroonrat
1,*
1
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
2
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Maha Vajiralongkorn Thanyaburi Hospital, Pathum Thani 12110, Thailand
3
Master of Science Program in Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
4
Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(17), 1960; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171960
Submission received: 27 July 2024 / Revised: 14 August 2024 / Accepted: 23 August 2024 / Published: 5 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Update on Nuclear Medicine)

Abstract

:
Lymphoscintigraphy evaluates the lymphatic system using radiocolloid compounds like 99mTc-sulfur colloid and 99mTc-nanocolloid, which vary in particle size and distribution timing. A local in-house Dextran kit (15–40 nm) was developed in 2005 and began clinical use in 2008 to localize sentinel lymph nodes; diagnose lymphedema; and detect lymphatic leakage. The normal drainage pattern remains unexplored. We retrospectively analyzed 84 upper extremity lymphoscintigraphies from 2008 to 2021. 99mTc in-house Dextran was intradermally injected into both hands, followed by whole-body imaging at specified intervals (≤15 min; 16–30 min; 31–45 min; 46–60 min), with some receiving delayed imaging. Visual and quantitative analyses recorded axillary and forearm lymph nodes and liver, kidney, and urinary bladder activity. Results showed 92% (77/84) upper extremity lymphatic tract visualization within 45 min. Axillary node detection rates increased from 46% (≤15 min) to 86% (46–60 min). Delayed imaging further revealed nodes. Epitrochlear or brachial node visualization was rare (4%, 3/84). Hepatic, renal, and urinary bladder activity was noted in 54%, 71%, and 93% at 1 h, respectively. The axillary node uptake ratio was minimal (<2.5% of injection site activity; median 0.33%). This study characterizes normal upper extremity lymphatic drainage using 99mTc in-house Dextran, offering insights into its clinical application

1. Introduction

Lymphoscintigraphy, a low-risk nuclear imaging technique [1], is pivotal in diagnosing arm and leg lymphedema, initially described in 1953 [2]. It remains the gold standard for this diagnosis [3]. However, standardized procedures for upper extremity lymphoscintigraphy vary widely among diagnostic units due to factors like radiotracer type, injection site, and imaging methods [4,5,6,7,8,9].
Radiotracers in lymphoscintigraphy are typically colloid-based compounds usually labeled with technetium-99m pertechnetate, ideally under 100 nanometers for efficient lymphatic transport. Their size affects absorption and distribution speed during imaging sessions [10,11].
Reported radiotracers and their respective particle sizes include 99mTc-human serum albumin (HSA), <4 nm; 99mTc-dextran, <4 nm; 198Au-colloid, 5–15 nm; 99mTc-microaggregated albumin, 10 nm; 99mTc-antimony trisulphide (Lymph-Flo®), 3–30 nm; 99mTc-albumin nanocolloid (Nanocoll®), <80 nm; 99mTc-rhenium colloid (Nanocis®), 50–200 nm; 99mTc-filtered sulfur colloid, <100 nm; 99mTc-stannous fluoride (Hepatate®), <200 nm; 99mTc-sulfur colloid (Cis-sulfur colloid®), 100–1000 nm; and 99mTc-stannous phytate, 100–1000 nm [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
Due to cost considerations and occasional shortages of imported colloid kits, local production of in-house colloid kits commenced in 2005. Derived from Dextran for its safety and availability, the kit features colloidal particles between 15 and 40 nanometers. This in-house Dextran kit was granted a Petty Patent by the National Department of Intellectual Property in October 2008. It has been optimized and preliminarily validated, demonstrating comparable efficacy in detecting sentinel lymph nodes compared to other nanocolloids. It is economically advantageous per kit or patient and particularly beneficial when testing multiple patients in a single day using a single bottle. Additionally, the kits can be stored for over a year and require straightforward preparation without boiling during labeling with 99mTc [28].
In cooperation with the national public organization under the supervision of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, this kit was recently commercialized in lyophilized form for nationwide distribution. Despite its current use in lymphoscintigraphy imaging, there remains a need for comprehensive data on the normal lymphatic drainage characteristics of 99mTc in-house Dextran. We aim to characterize normal lymphatic drainage patterns using lymphoscintigraphy images with 99mTc in-house Dextran from the upper extremities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This retrospective analysis includes all patients who underwent upper extremity lymphoscintigraphy at our facility from the introduction of the 99mTc in-house Dextran in 2008 to 2021. Data collection included relevant demographic and clinical characteristics with inclusion and exclusion criteria as follows:
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Aged 18 years and older.
  • Patients with at least one normal arm.
  • No previous diagnosis of lymphedema in the included arm.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • History of arm or breast surgery on the included side.
  • Prior radiotherapy to the included arm.
  • Presence of cellulitis during examination.
  • History of significant trauma to the included arm.
  • History of cancer metastasizing to the included arm.
  • Generalized edema.
  • Peripheral vascular disease.
  • History of bilateral breast cancer.
  • Family history of congenital lymphedema.

2.2. Radiopharmaceutical Preparation and Administration

In total, 0.5 milliliters of the frozen in-house Dextran kit was thawed from −20 degrees Celsius before adding 0.5 milliliters of technetium-99m pertechnetate, approximately 185 MBq (5 mCi). The vial is gently agitated and left at room temperature for approximately 10 min. Quality control for labeling is performed using instant thin-layer chromatography impregnated with a silica gel (ITLC-SG), using methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) as the mobile phase to ensure radiochemical purity (RCP) exceeding 95% [28].
99mTc in-house Dextran, 18.5 MBq (0.5 mCi), 0.2 mL, is injected intradermally into each hand dorsum. The patient is instructed to move their hands to facilitate radiopharmaceutical movement repeatedly.

2.3. Lymphoscintigraphy Imaging Procedure

Imaging is performed using a dual-head gamma camera (Philips ForteTM, Cleveland, OH, USA & GE InfiniaTM, Tirat Carmel, Israel), set in a fixed position with an H-mode start position for anterior and posterior views. The scan speed is 10 cm/min with a matrix size 256 × 1024. An LEGP collimator is used with a window centered at 140 keV ± 10% energy. The patient lies flat with their arm raised beside the head. Images are taken immediately after injecting the radiopharmaceutical in a continuous scan from the hands down to the pubic symphysis for 4 time-point intervals after radiopharmaceutical injection (≤15 min, 16–30 min, 31–45 min, and 46–60 min). Delayed imaging of up to 4 h may be performed. Figure 1 demonstrates 4-time-point images from the upper extremity lymphoscintigraphy protocol.

2.4. Qualitative (Visual) Analysis

Visualization of findings on lymphoscintigraphy images at each time-point includes the following:
  • Axillary lymph nodes;
  • Forearm (Epitrochlear of Brachial) lymph nodes;
  • Upper extremity lymphatic tract and associated organs, i.e., liver, kidney, urinary bladder.

2.5. Quantitative Analysis

All available raw images were transferred and analyzed using Xeleris software (version 4.1; GE Healthcare, Bangkok, Thailand). The quantitative analysis involved assessing counts by drawing fixed-size regions of interest (ROIs) around the axillary node and the injection site on the ipsilateral normal hand as sampled ROIs in Figure 1. Two percentages were assessed using the following equation:

2.5.1. Percentage of Axillary Lymph Node Uptake (%ANU) [29]

% ANU = ANU IIS × DF × 100
  • ANU: Uptake of axillary node (counts)
  • IIS: Initial uptake in the injection site (counts)
  • DF: Technetium-99m’s decay factor

2.5.2. Percentage of Radiopharmaceutical Clearance at Injection Site (%RC) [29]

% RC = IIS × DF LIS IIS × DF × 100
  • IIS: Initial uptake in the injection site (counts)
  • LIS: Later uptake in the injection site at imaged time-points up to 1 h (counts)
  • DF: Technetium-99m’s decay factor at imaged time-points up to 1 h

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data and as medians and interquartile ranges for non-normally distributed data. Categorical data are presented as counts and percentages.

3. Results

3.1. Population Studied

A total of 101 patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy studies using 99mTc in-house Dextran between 2008 and 2021, meeting the study’s inclusion criteria. Seventeen patients were subsequently excluded: eight due to generalized edema and nine due to bilateral breast cancer. This exclusion resulted in 84 examinations qualifying for qualitative analysis. Notably, incomplete raw data in 60 studies limited the quantitative analysis to 24 examinations, as depicted in Figure 2.

3.2. Population Characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of 84 patients eligible for qualitative analysis. The study population was predominantly female (96%) with a high prevalence of unilateral breast cancer history (92%). Among the remaining seven patients with unilateral arm swelling, causes included five cases of unknown origin, one related to Rhabdomyosarcoma, and one due to an accident. Both left and right arms were equally studied for visual analysis. The average age was 59.96 ± 12.15 years, with the cohort’s average weight, height, and BMI recorded as 64.36 ± 12.20 kg, 154.26 ± 6.00 cm, and 26.92 ± 4.64 kg/m2, respectively. All of the 24 patients included in the quantitative lymphoscintigraphy analysis were female. Nearly all, except one patient with unknown arm swelling, had a history of breast cancer. The average and standard deviation of age, weight, height, BMI, and affected side of the arm were comparable to those of the qualitative analysis group.

3.3. Qualitative Analysis

The visual assessment of upper extremity lymph nodes following 99mTc in-house Dextran injection, as detailed in Table 2, indicated the following:
  • Axillary lymph node detection rates were 46% within 15 min, rising to 68% between 16 and 30 min, and approximately 86% within the first hour.
  • Most identified axillary nodes were solitary, with 13% exhibiting two nodes and 5% showing three or more (Figure 3A).
  • Detection in the elbow (Epitrochial/brachial) node was rare, around 4% within an hour, typically involving two or fewer nodes (Figure 3C).
  • Delayed imaging up to 4 h further revealed lymph nodes in the axillary region for 10 out of 12 patients initially without detected axillary nodes within the first hour. The remaining two patients did not undergo delayed imaging beyond 2 h.
Table 3 illustrates the detection rates of upper lymphatic pathways and organ activity associated with lymphatic circulation following injection of 99mTc in-house Dextran:
  • Upper extremity lymphatic tracts can be detected at approximately 61% within 15 min and up to 92% within 31–45 min.
  • Organs such as the liver, kidney, and urinary bladder show detection rates of 54%, 71%, and 93%, respectively, within the first hour (Figure 3B).
  • The radiopharmaceutical persists in these organs and lymphatic pathways, with increasing activity observed continuously beyond 50% probability thresholds. Specifically, liver, kidney, and urinary bladder detection thresholds are reached at least 46 min, 31 min, and 16 min, respectively.

3.4. Quantitative Analysis

Among the 24 studies conducted, delineation of the ROIs around these areas yielded an initial median count at the axillary nodes of approximately 199.62, which increased to about 922.91 within one hour. In contrast, injection site activity, on the same included hand, started with a median count of approximately 325,377.06 within the first 15 min, gradually decreasing to approximately 237,886.02 counts by the end of 1 h as detailed in Table 4.
From the evaluation of axillary node uptake as a percentage of injection site activity over various time intervals up to 1 h, it was observed that despite the minimal percentage, there is a consistent upward trend in these values, detailed in Table 5. The lymphatic drainage uptake in the axillary nodes shows a consistent increase over time, peaking at approximately 2.5% compared to the activity observed at the injection site within the first hour. Median uptake values at specific time intervals are as follows: within 15 min, 0.05%; 16–30 min, 0.10%; 31–45 min, 0.14%; and reaching a maximum median value of about 0.33% at 1 h. Meanwhile, the median value for radiopharmaceutical clearance in the less-than-15-min interval starts at 2.79%, gradually rising to 9.17% by the end of the first hour.

4. Discussion

Lymphoscintigraphy is a nuclear medicine imaging technique employed to assess the lymphatic system, used for sentinel lymph node localization and lymphedema evaluation of upper or lower extremities [30,31,32,33,34,35], utilizing radionuclide-labeled colloidal particles [36,37]. Presently favored and commercially available agents include 99mTc-filtered sulfur colloid, characterized by particle sizes ranging from 10 to 50 nanometers [31]. In contrast, 99mTc-albumin nanocolloid, featuring particles smaller than 80 nanometers, often encounters challenges during labeling [30]. 99mTc-human serum albumin (HSA) and 99mTc-dextran exhibit rapid movement with particle sizes less than 4 nanometers. As previously mentioned, the local Dextran kit is different. Therefore, we have 99mTc in-house Dextran with colloidal particle sizes of approximately 15-40 nanometers. Various factors besides colloidal size influence distribution within the lymphatic system. These may include flow dynamics between lymphatic vessel walls and nodes, affected by vascular and interstitial characteristics, as well as muscular activities [38,39,40]. The advantages and disadvantages of various techniques have been thoroughly reviewed [9]. For characterization or follow-up purposes, the techniques employed should be consistent.
This descriptive retrospective study aims to analyze the characteristics and dynamics of intradermally injected 99mTc in-house Dextran distribution through the lymphatic system, visualized from raised hands to the body via lymphoscintigraphy. The study population primarily consisted of breast cancer patients with unilateral arm lymphedema following surgery, with the contralateral arm serving as the studied population of normal upper extremity. The cohort was predominantly from late middle-aged individuals to early seniors, with an average BMI indicating an overweight status. Both upper extremities were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively in a balanced manner.
Evaluation of upper extremity lymph node visualization following injection of the 99mTc in-house Dextran radiopharmaceutical via lymphoscintigraphy revealed that axillary lymph nodes were observed in approximately 46% of cases within less than 15 min, and an additional 40% between 16 min and 1 h, totaling 86%. These findings closely mirrored studies by Rezende et al. (2011) [41] and de Oliveira et al. (2016) [42] using 99mTc-dextran, which reported node visualization rates of approximately 44% and 39.42% within the first 10 min, totaling 88% and 77% at 1 h, respectively. In contrast, studies using 99mTc-nanocolloid by Rossi et al. (2016) [43] indicated slower movement with lymphatic nodes observed in normal arms at approximately 20% within the first 20 min, totaling 50% at 1 h, attributable to larger particle sizes.
Axillary lymph node visualization was achieved in nearly all patients within this study, although in some cases, visibility extended beyond the first hour, with delays of up to 4 h noted. However, two patients did not reveal upper extremity lymph nodes within the initial 2-h imaging period. Nonetheless, visualization of lymphatic drainage pathways and organ uptake continued, as depicted in Figure 1.
A single axillary node was most frequently visualized, with the highest count observed being five nodes (Figure 3A). Imaging consistently showed a high likelihood of finding one node (70%), two nodes (23%), and three or more nodes (5%) within 4 h post-injection. This contrasts with findings from Devoogdt et al. (2014) [44], utilizing 99mTc-HSA, which reported a higher likelihood (25%) of visualizing four nodes and an 18% probability of detecting a single node, attributed to smaller particle sizes and subcutaneous injection.
Visual assessments of the upper extremity lymphatic tract indicated up to 92% visibility within 30 min post-injection. Further tracer accumulation in organs associated with lymphatic circulation is evident in the urinary bladder, kidney, and liver, respectively. This suggests rapid renal excretion of the radiopharmaceutical, with transient accumulation in the renal parenchyma. Activity persisted in lymphatic pathways and organs within the first hour, gradually increasing, with visibility exceeding 50% in the liver, kidneys, and urinary bladder at least 46 min, 31 min, and 16 min post-injection, respectively, in line with findings by de Oliveira et al. (2016) [42]. The lymphatic pathway and organs are less visible in larger radiocolloid use of 99mTc-phytate [45].
Quantitative analysis of axillary lymph node counts indicated initial median counts of approximately 199.62 within the first 15 min, progressively increasing over time. By 1 h, counts reached a maximum median of 922.91. The median percentage of axillary lymph node uptake (%ANU) at 31–45 min approximated 0.14%, comparable to findings by Devoogdt et al. (2014) [44] utilizing 99mTc-HSA, where median values were around 0.1% at 45 min. Axillary node uptake percentages remain around 1% with other radiocolloids [29,45]; however, in cases of lymphedema, the affected arm shows lower uptake percentages compared to the normal arm when using the same radiocolloid.
The median percentage of the 99mTc in-house Dextran clearance from the intradermally injected hand was estimated at approximately 9% within the first hour. Conversely, Devoogdt et al. (2014) [44], using 99mTc-HSA, reported a median radiopharmaceutical clearance of 5-7% at 2 h post subcutaneous injection. Similarly, the radiotracer clearance percentage is lower in the lymphedema-affected arm compared to the normal arm [29].
The limitations of this study include its retrospective design, which has potential inconsistencies in documentation. Imaging predominantly occurred within the first hour post radiocolloid injection, possibly limiting observations beyond this period. Sample size may also have affected the study’s ability to fully assess qualitative and quantitative aspects. Furthermore, findings related to organ activity in the liver, kidneys, and urinary bladder primarily pertain to breast cancer patients who had undergone surgery unilaterally, potentially limiting generalizability to the broader population.
The selection of radiocolloid types, injection sites, and imaging protocols has been discussed [46]. These decisions typically revolve around cost-effectiveness considerations and radiocolloids’ local availability [28]. These factors are crucial in determining the feasibility and practicality of lymphoscintigraphy procedures in clinical practice.

5. Conclusions

This study characterizes normal upper extremity lymphatic drainage using 99mTc in-house Dextran, offering insights into its clinical application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.C. and W.C.; methodology, K.C. and W.C.; investigation, W.K. and W.C.; resources, P.C., S.M. and K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, W.K. and W.C.; writing—review and editing, W.K., P.C., K.C., S.M., K.K., C.S. (Chaninart Sakulpisuti), K.T., A.K., C.S. (Chanika Sritara) and W.C.; visualization, W.K. and W.C.; supervision, P.C., K.C. and W.C.; project administration, W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This article received no external funding, and the APC was funded by the Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine of Ramathibodi Hospital (MURA2021/876 and date of approval 15 October 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective study design for available imaging.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Modi, S.; Stanton, A.W.; Mortimer, P.S.; Levick, J.R. Clinical assessment of human lymph flow using removal rate constants of interstitial macromolecules: A critical review of lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2007, 5, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sherman, A.I.; Ter-Pogossian, M. Lymph-node concentration of radioactive colloidal gold following interstitial injection. Cancer 1953, 6, 1238–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Keo, H.H.; Gretener, S.B.; Staub, D. Clinical and diagnostic aspects of lymphedema. Vasa 2017, 46, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pain, S.J.; Purushotham, A.D.; Barber, R.W.; Ballinger, J.R.; Solanki, C.K.; Mortimer, P.S.; Peters, A.M. Variation in lymphatic function may predispose to development of breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2004, 30, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bittar, S.; Simman, R.; Lurie, F. Lymphedema: A Practical Approach and Clinical Update. Wounds 2020, 32, 86–92. [Google Scholar]
  6. Holliday, R.M.; Jain, M.K.; Accurso, J.M.; Sharma, A.; Harrison, S.R.; Aloszka, D.L.; Bowman, A.W. Buffering the Suffering of Breast Lymphoscintigraphy. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2020, 48, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ranzenberger, L.R.; Pai, R.B. Lymphoscintigraphy. In StatPearls; Treasure Island: San Francisco, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shimazu, K.; Tamaki, Y.; Taguchi, T.; Motomura, K.; Inaji, H.; Koyama, H.; Kasugai, T.; Wada, A.; Noguchi, S. Lymphoscintigraphic visualization of internal mammary nodes with subtumoral injection of radiocolloid in patients with breast cancer. Ann. Surg. 2003, 237, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sadeghi, R.; Ravari, H. Lymphoscintigraphy in the Management of Lymphatic Disorders. In Clinical Nuclear Medicine; Ahmadzadehfar, H., Biersack, H.J., Freeman, L., Zuckier, L., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 459–478. [Google Scholar]
  10. Villa, G.; Campisi, C.C.; Ryan, M.; Boccardo, F.; Di Summa, P.; Frascio, M.; Sambuceti, G. Procedural Recommendations for Lymphoscintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Lymphedema: The Genoa Protocol. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2019, 53, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Szuba, A.; Shin, W.S.; Strauss, H.W.; Rockson, S. The third circulation: Radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphedema. J. Nucl. Med. 2003, 44, 43–57. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kataoka, M.; Kawamura, M.; Hamada, K.; Itoh, H.; Nishiyama, Y.; Hamamoto, K. Quantitative lymphoscintigraphy using 99Tcm human serum albumin in patients with previously treated uterine cancer. Br. J. Radiol. 1991, 64, 1119–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Henze, E.; Schelbert, H.R.; Collins, J.D.; Najafi, A.; Barrio, J.R.; Bennett, L.R. Lymphoscintigraphy with Tc-99m-labeled dextran. J. Nucl. Med. 1982, 23, 923–929. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kazem, I.; Antoniades, J.; Brady, L.W.; Faust, D.S.; Croll, M.N.; Lightfoot, D. Clinical evaluation of lymph node scanning utilizing colloidal gold 198. Radiology 1968, 90, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Strand, S.E.; Persson, B.R. Quantitative lymphoscintigraphy I: Basic concepts for optimal uptake of radiocolloids in the parasternal lymph nodes of rabbits. J. Nucl. Med. 1979, 20, 1038–1046. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Bergqvist, L.; Strand, S.E.; Persson, B.R. Particle sizing and biokinetics of interstitial lymphoscintigraphic agents. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1983, 13, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hung, J.C.; Wiseman, G.A.; Wahner, H.W.; Mullan, B.P.; Taggart, T.R.; Dunn, W.L. Filtered technetium-99m-sulfur colloid evaluated for lymphoscintigraphy. J. Nucl. Med. 1995, 36, 1895–1901. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Tsopelas, C. Particle size analysis of (99m)Tc-labeled and unlabeled antimony trisulfide and rhenium sulfide colloids intended for lymphoscintigraphic application. J. Nucl. Med. 2001, 42, 460–466. [Google Scholar]
  19. Weiss, M.; Schmid, R.A.; Kunte, C.; Konz, B.; Hahn, K. First experiences with a new radiopharmaceutical for sentinel lymph node detection in malignant melanoma: 99mTc colloidal rhenium sulphide. Nuklearmedizin 2004, 43, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  20. Giammarile, F.; Alazraki, N.; Aarsvold, J.N.; Audisio, R.A.; Glass, E.; Grant, S.F.; Kunikowska, J.; Leidenius, M.; Moncayo, V.M.; Uren, R.F.; et al. The EANM and SNMMI practice guideline for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2013, 40, 1932–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tsopelas, C. The radiopharmaceutical chemistry of 99mTc-tin fluoride colloid-labeled-leukocytes. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2005, 49, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Davis, M.A.; Jones, A.G.; Trindade, H. A rapid and accurate method for sizing radiocolloids. J. Nucl. Med. 1974, 15, 923–928. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, S.; Bao, W.; Bai, X.; Gao, C.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, Z. 99mTc-labeled sodium phytate and stannous chloride injection accurately detects sentinel lymph node in axillary of early stage breast cancer: A randomized, controlled study. Onco Targets Ther. 2018, 11, 1891–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nawaz, K.; Hamad, M.M.; Sadek, S.; Awdeh, M.; Eklof, B.; Abdel-Dayem, H.M. Dynamic lymph flow imaging in lymphedema. Normal and abnormal patterns. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1986, 11, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Witte, C.L.; Witte, M.H. Diagnostic and interventional imaging of lymphatic disorders. Int. Angiol. 1999, 18, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Wilhelm, A.J.; Mijnhout, G.S.; Franssen, E.J. Radiopharmaceuticals in sentinel lymph-node detection-an overview. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1999, 26, S36–S42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Michenfelder, M.M.; Bartlett, L.J.; Mahoney, D.W.; Herold, T.J.; Hung, J.C. Particle-size and radiochemical purity evaluations of filtered 99mTc-sulfur colloid prepared with different heating times. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2014, 42, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Charoenphun, P.; Thongklam, K.; Wittayachokkitikhun, S. In-house radiocolloid development for sentinel lymph node detection. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Trends in Radiopharmaceuticals (ISTR), Vienna, Austria, 28 October–1 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, P.; Lee, J.K.; Lim, O.K.; Park, H.K.; Park, K.D. Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy to Predict the Possibility of Lymphedema Development After Breast Cancer Surgery: Retrospective Clinical Study. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2017, 41, 1065–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gommans, G.M.; Gommans, E.; van der Zant, F.M.; Teule, G.J.; van der Schors, T.G.; de Waard, J.W. 99mTc Nanocoll: A radiopharmaceutical for sentinel node localisation in breast cancer-in vitro and in vivo results. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2009, 67, 1550–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yuan, Z.; Chen, L.; Luo, Q.; Zhu, J.; Lu, H.; Zhu, R. The role of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in extremity lymphedema. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2006, 20, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yoo, J.N.; Cheong, Y.S.; Min, Y.S.; Lee, S.W.; Park, H.Y.; Jung, T.D. Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2015, 39, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dalia, R.M.; Martins, G.R.P.; Barbosa, R.; Lima, C.F.d.; Siqueira, C.F. Qualitative and quantitative lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of lower limbs lymphedema. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2005, 48, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Goss, J.A.; Maclellan, R.A.; Greene, A.K. Lymphoscintigraphic Evaluation of Systemic Tracer Uptake in Patients With Primary Lymphedema. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2019, 82, S212–S214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chilgar, R.M.; Khade, S.; Chen, H.C.; Ciudad, P.; Yeo, M.S.; Kiranantawat, K.; Maruccia, M.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y.X.; Nicoli, F. Surgical Treatment of Advanced Lymphatic Filariasis of Lower Extremity Combining Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer and Excisional Procedures. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2019, 17, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Munjal, A.; Gupta, N. Radiopharmaceuticals. In StatPearls; Treasure Island: San Francisco, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lead, J.R.; Wilkinson, K.J. Aquatic Colloids and Nanoparticles: Current Knowledge and Future Trends. Environ. Chem. 2006, 3, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rezzola, S.; Sigmund, E.C.; Halin, C.; Ronca, R. The lymphatic vasculature: An active and dynamic player in cancer progression. Med. Res. Rev. 2022, 42, 576–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Reddy, N.P.; Krouskop, T.A.; Newell, P.H., Jr. A computer model of the lymphatic system. Comput. Biol. Med. 1977, 7, 181–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lane, K.; Dolan, L.; Worsley, D.; McKenzie, D. Lymphoscintigraphy to evaluate the effect of high versus low intensity upper body dynamic exercise on lymphatic function in healthy females. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2006, 4, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rezende, L.F.; Pedras, F.V.; Ramos, C.D.; Gurgel, M.S. Preoperative upper limb lymphatic function in breast cancer surgery. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2011, 57, 540–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. de Oliveira, M.M.F.; Sarian, L.O.; Gurgel, M.S.C.; Almeida Filho, J.G.; Ramos, C.D.; de Rezende, L.F.; Amorim, B.J. Lymphatic Function in the Early Postoperative Period of Breast Cancer Has No Short-Term Clinical Impact. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2016, 14, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rossi, M.; Grassi, R.; Costa, R.; Di Rosa, L.; D’Arpa, S.; Moschella, F.; Cordova, A. Evaluation of the Upper Limb Lymphatic System: A Prospective Lymphoscintigraphic Study in Melanoma Patients and Healthy Controls. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016, 138, 1321–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Devoogdt, N.; Van den Wyngaert, T.; Bourgeois, P.; Lambrechts, M.; Van Kampen, M.; De Groef, A.; Geraerts, I.; Neven, P.; Vergote, I.; Tjalma, W.; et al. Reproducibility of lymphoscintigraphic evaluation of the upper limb. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2014, 12, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, Y.H.; Hwang, J.H.; Bae, J.H.; Choi, J.Y. Predictive value of lymphoscintigraphy in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema undergoing complex decongestive therapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 173, 735–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. O’Mahony, S.; Rose, S.L.; Chilvers, A.J.; Ballinger, J.R.; Solanki, C.K.; Barber, R.W.; Mortimer, P.S.; Purushotham, A.D.; Peters, A.M. Finding an optimal method for imaging lymphatic vessels of the upper limb. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2004, 31, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Anterior images at four time-points during the upper extremity lymphoscintigraphy protocol, illustrating sampled regions of interest (ROIs) indicated by circles. The ROIs were positioned over the normal upper extremity injection site (right hand) and the ipsilateral axillary lymph node in the right upper extremity. Notably, both hands exhibit injection site activity. However, no forearm lymph nodes were detected throughout the study. The 15-min image initially displays a lymphatic draining tract (T) in the right upper extremity and two right axillary lymph nodes, accompanied by fainter activity in the liver (L), kidney (K), and urinary bladder (U). In addition, lymphedema scintigraphy findings of the left upper extremity are evidenced by chronic dermal backflow and absence of typical lymphatic tract and node visualization, attributable to previous resection of left breast cancer.
Figure 1. Anterior images at four time-points during the upper extremity lymphoscintigraphy protocol, illustrating sampled regions of interest (ROIs) indicated by circles. The ROIs were positioned over the normal upper extremity injection site (right hand) and the ipsilateral axillary lymph node in the right upper extremity. Notably, both hands exhibit injection site activity. However, no forearm lymph nodes were detected throughout the study. The 15-min image initially displays a lymphatic draining tract (T) in the right upper extremity and two right axillary lymph nodes, accompanied by fainter activity in the liver (L), kidney (K), and urinary bladder (U). In addition, lymphedema scintigraphy findings of the left upper extremity are evidenced by chronic dermal backflow and absence of typical lymphatic tract and node visualization, attributable to previous resection of left breast cancer.
Diagnostics 14 01960 g001
Figure 2. The sequence of participant selection criteria for inclusion and exclusion.
Figure 2. The sequence of participant selection criteria for inclusion and exclusion.
Diagnostics 14 01960 g002
Figure 3. Anterior images of 3 patients (AC) demonstrated variation of the normal upper extremity at the left side of patient A and the right side of patients B and C. Up to 5 axillary lymph nodes (large red circle) of patient A’s left upper extremity were counted, with clear visualization and increasing number over time. Forearm nodes were seen in patient C’s upper extremities at 4 h (arrows), one on each side. In patient B, organs, i.e., liver, kidneys, and urinary bladder, are hardly seen even up to 2 h. The findings of upper extremity lymphedema and chronic lymphatic obstruction post-MRM at the right side of patient A and the left side of patient B are as aforementioned in Figure 1’s legend. Although clinical long-term left forearm edema of patient C and some radiotracers accumulate prolongedly in the medial aspect of the left forearm, there is no definite scintigraphy evidence of lymphatic obstruction of patient C’s left upper extremity.
Figure 3. Anterior images of 3 patients (AC) demonstrated variation of the normal upper extremity at the left side of patient A and the right side of patients B and C. Up to 5 axillary lymph nodes (large red circle) of patient A’s left upper extremity were counted, with clear visualization and increasing number over time. Forearm nodes were seen in patient C’s upper extremities at 4 h (arrows), one on each side. In patient B, organs, i.e., liver, kidneys, and urinary bladder, are hardly seen even up to 2 h. The findings of upper extremity lymphedema and chronic lymphatic obstruction post-MRM at the right side of patient A and the left side of patient B are as aforementioned in Figure 1’s legend. Although clinical long-term left forearm edema of patient C and some radiotracers accumulate prolongedly in the medial aspect of the left forearm, there is no definite scintigraphy evidence of lymphatic obstruction of patient C’s left upper extremity.
Diagnostics 14 01960 g003
Table 1. Population characteristics.
Table 1. Population characteristics.
Normal Upper ExtremityQualitative Analysis
(n= 84)
Quantitative Analysis
(n = 24)
Age (years), mean ± SD59.96 ± 12.1562.87 ± 11.92
Weight (kg), mean ± SD64.36 ± 12.2065.41 ± 10.66
Height (cm), mean ± SD154.26 ± 6.00154.26 ± 6.39
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD26.92 ± 4.6427.20 ± 4.14
Gender
- Female, n (%)
81 (96%)24 (100%)
Normal arm
- Right, n (%)
42 (50%)11 (45%)
Underlying breast cancer, n (%)77 (92%)23 (96%)
Table 2. Probability of detecting upper extremity lymph nodes from lymphoscintigraphy images (n = 84).
Table 2. Probability of detecting upper extremity lymph nodes from lymphoscintigraphy images (n = 84).
Time Interval (min)Nodal
Number
Regions
Axillary, n (%)Epitrochial/brachial, n (%)
≤15045 (54%)83 (99%)
133 (39%)1 (1%)
24 (5%)-
≥32 (2%)-
16–30027 (32%)82 (98%)
145 (53%)1 (1%)
29 (11%)1 (1%)
≥33 (4%)-
31–45016 (19%)81 (96%)
154 (64%)2 (3%)
210 (12%)1 (1%)
≥34 (5%)-
46–60012 (14%)81 (96%)
157 (68%)2 (3%)
211 (13%)1 (1%)
≥34 (5%)-
240
(Up to 4 h)
02 * (2%)81 (96%)
159 (70%)2 (3%)
219 (23%)1 (1%)
≥34 (5%)-
* no 4-h-delayed imaging.
Table 3. Probability of detecting lymphatic pathways and organs associated with lymphatic circulation.
Table 3. Probability of detecting lymphatic pathways and organs associated with lymphatic circulation.
VisualizationTime Interval (min)
≤1516–3031–4546–60
Upper extremity lymphatic tract activity, n (%)51 (61%)70 (83%)77 (92%)77 (92%)
Liver activity, n (%)8 (10%)17 (20%)23 (27%)45 (54%)
Kidney activity, n (%)10 (12%)31 (37%)45 (54%)60 (71%)
Urinary bladder activity, n (%)23 (27%)65 (77%)73 (87%)78 (93%)
Table 4. Quantitative evaluation of axillary lymph node and injection site activity (n = 24).
Table 4. Quantitative evaluation of axillary lymph node and injection site activity (n = 24).
Time
Interval (min)
Study of Visualized Lymph Node, n (%)Total Count [Median (Range)]
Axillary Lymph NodeInjection Site
≤1514 (58%)199.62 (2377.43)325,377.06 (446,079.03)
16–3016 (67%)468.84 (4090.21)302,932.48 (467,057.55)
31–4518 (75%)508.01 (5794.04)272,720.90 (457,650.09)
46–6020 (83%)922.91 (6655.25)237,886.02 (398,128.31)
Table 5. Uptake of lymphatic drainage pathway to axillary node and clearance at injection site.
Table 5. Uptake of lymphatic drainage pathway to axillary node and clearance at injection site.
Time Interval
(min)
% Axillary Lymph Node Uptake (ANU) [Median (Range)]% Radiopharmaceutical Clearance (RC)
[Median (Range)]
≤150.05 (1.46)2.79 (4.19)
16–300.10 (1.56)3.18 (56.96)
31–450.14 (2.06)7.02 (83.71)
46–600.33 (2.40)9.17 (50.03)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Katiyarangsan, W.; Charoenphun, P.; Chuamsaamarkkee, K.; Musikarat, S.; Kiranantawat, K.; Sakulpisuti, C.; Thamnirat, K.; Kositwattanarerk, A.; Sritara, C.; Chamroonrat, W. Characterizing Normal Upper Extremity Lymphatic Flow with 99mTc In-House Dextran: A Retrospective Study. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171960

AMA Style

Katiyarangsan W, Charoenphun P, Chuamsaamarkkee K, Musikarat S, Kiranantawat K, Sakulpisuti C, Thamnirat K, Kositwattanarerk A, Sritara C, Chamroonrat W. Characterizing Normal Upper Extremity Lymphatic Flow with 99mTc In-House Dextran: A Retrospective Study. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(17):1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Katiyarangsan, Wiroj, Putthiporn Charoenphun, Krisanat Chuamsaamarkkee, Suchawadee Musikarat, Kidakorn Kiranantawat, Chaninart Sakulpisuti, Kanungnij Thamnirat, Arpakorn Kositwattanarerk, Chanika Sritara, and Wichana Chamroonrat. 2024. "Characterizing Normal Upper Extremity Lymphatic Flow with 99mTc In-House Dextran: A Retrospective Study" Diagnostics 14, no. 17: 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171960

APA Style

Katiyarangsan, W., Charoenphun, P., Chuamsaamarkkee, K., Musikarat, S., Kiranantawat, K., Sakulpisuti, C., Thamnirat, K., Kositwattanarerk, A., Sritara, C., & Chamroonrat, W. (2024). Characterizing Normal Upper Extremity Lymphatic Flow with 99mTc In-House Dextran: A Retrospective Study. Diagnostics, 14(17), 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop