Next Article in Journal
Discordance of Biomarker Expression Profile between Primary Breast Cancer and Synchronous Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Preoperative Core Needle Biopsy
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Finger Flexor Tendon Hypoplasia in a Child with Phalangeal Agenesis
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Juvenile Primary Sjögren Syndrome in a 15-Year-Old Boy with Renal Involvement: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Diagnostics 2024, 14(3), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14030258
by Katerina Bouchalova 1,*, Hana Flögelova 1,*, Pavel Horak 2, Jakub Civrny 3, Petr Mlcak 4, Richard Pink 5, Jaroslav Michalek 6, Petra Camborova 7, Zuzana Mikulkova 8 and Eva Kriegova 8
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2024, 14(3), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14030258
Submission received: 22 December 2023 / Revised: 16 January 2024 / Accepted: 19 January 2024 / Published: 25 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Laboratory Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

A very interesting case presented with high quality and supported by amazing figures and literature. Sjögren syndrome is a rare autoimmune disease in childhood which is also possibly overlooked by clinicians. I would like to congratulate the authors for their motivation to diagnose the patient who even has no autoantibody positivity. I have only 2 minor concern:

1) The meaning of the first sentence of the abstract is not clear. Please, rephrase

2) I am wondering if the patient has undergone any test to detect any ocular dryness. Please, explain.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors reported a juvenile case of Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) complicating tubulointerstitial nephritis, and stated the patient was compatible with 2016 ACR-EULAR SS criteria. However, there are several uncertain points about the diagnosis.

1.       Existence of subjective sicca symptoms is required as inclusion criteria of 2016 ACR-EULAR SS criteria, which is not clear in Case Description.

2.       Line 107 to 109: Labial salivary gland biopsy was non-diagnostic, however, the subman- dibular one supported SS. Lymphocytic foci (i.e. foci with more than 50 lymphocytes) were found in the number of 5 per 4 mm2 of tissue.In 2016 ACR-EULAR SS criteria, ‘Labial salivary gland with focal lymphocytic sialadenitis and focus score of1 foci/4 mm2’ is stated.

3.       How about results of ocular staining score?

4.       How about anti-Ro/SS-A antibodies? Negative results of ANA do not always exclude possibility of positive anti-Ro/SS-A antibodies.

5.       Did the authors all exclusion criteria in 2016 ACR-EULAR SS criteria? The explanation in Line 104 ‘Further workup excluded IgG4-related and other diseases.’ is not satisfactory.

6.       Considering above, the authors had better consider the other classification criteria for SS, such as 2012 SICCA criteria and e 2002 American-European Consensus Group SS classification criteria

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

(No further comments)

Back to TopTop