Next Article in Journal
Limited Role of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) for Tumor Grade and Overall Survival in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vivo Classification and Characterization of Carotid Atherosclerotic Lesions with Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of IVIM Perfusion Fraction Improves Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Clinical and MRI-Based Assessment of Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders Treated by Controlled Mandibular Repositioning

Diagnostics 2024, 14(6), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14060572
by Diwakar Singh 1,†, Alain Landry 2,†, Martina Schmid-Schwap 3, Eva Piehslinger 3, André Gahleitner 4, Jiang Chen 5,* and Xiaohui Rausch-Fan 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2024, 14(6), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14060572
Submission received: 31 January 2024 / Revised: 20 February 2024 / Accepted: 1 March 2024 / Published: 7 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Radiomics in Medical Imaging)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The described paper show a interesting approach in therapeutic position using  the controlled mandibular repositioning reducing the anteriorly displaced discs. The results are supported by statistically significative studies according to Rm results.

We agree for publishing the submitted paper

Author Response

Dear Sir/Madam

First of all thank you very much for accepting to be a reviewer of our work.

I am feeling grateful for the comments and your valuable feedback which will motivate students like me improve more and more in field to Dentistry.

Kind Regards

Diwakar Singh and greetings from my mentors.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper written by singh et al. is an interesting analysis on the use of the controlled mandibular repositioning via clinical evaluation and MRI exam. The paper is really interesting and well written but there are some issues that could be improved before being published. 

The research field of this paper has reached a big interest in the past few years, but the authors cited only references that seem a bit outdated.

The reference format is not the one suggested in the authors guidelines provided by the editor.

The authors analyzed 20 patients and 37 joints, but the author did not mention if there could be differences between patients with bilateral and not TMD. Authors should highlight or justify this difference. 

Author Response

Dear Sir/Mam,

Thanks for you valuable feedback, it was a great learning experience for me and i have done all the suggested and highlighted in yellow. Sir/Mam there a attachment regarding your feedback hopefully i have answered them well. 

Once again thanking you 

Kind regards

Diwakar Singh

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop