Next Article in Journal
Early-Branched Short Renal Arteries Are False Multiple Renal Arteries
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Multiplex PCR on Diagnosis of Bacterial and Fungal Infections and Choice of Appropriate Antimicrobial Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Forgotten Rare Cause of Unilateral Basal Ganglia Calcinosis Due to Venous Angioma and Complicating Acute Stroke Management: A Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Cerebrovascular Imaging and Interventions

by
Seyedmehdi Payabvash
Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
Diagnostics 2025, 15(8), 1045; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15081045
Submission received: 15 April 2025 / Accepted: 17 April 2025 / Published: 20 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cerebrovascular Imaging and Interventions)
Since the 1990s, the global burden of cerebrovascular disease – particularly stroke – has significantly increased [1]. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) analysis, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, including cerebrovascular disease, almost doubled from 271 million in 1990 to 523 million in 2019 [2]. While age-standardized cardiovascular mortality declined in the 1990s, the trend slowed and then plateaued in the 2000s, and since 2010, cardiovascular mortality rates have increased in many countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Mexico [1]. Stroke remains the second leading cause of death globally, and the stroke-related disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), mortality, and treatment costs are expected to double from 2020 to 2050 [1]. These trends underscore the pressing need for advancing the diagnosis, treatment and recovery of cerebrovascular disease. Advancements in neuroimaging technologies, artificial intelligence, and image-guided interventions can improve care in patients with cerebrovascular disease. This Special Issue of Diagnostics includes cutting-edge research reports advanced in cerebrovascular disease imaging and treatment interventions, highlighting the progress being made to improve diagnosis, therapy, and patient care.

1. Advanced Imaging Techniques

Neuroimaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases. Over recent decades, advances such as improved MRI pulse sequences and the use of intravenous contrast agents have significantly improved the capabilities of neuroimaging and deepened our understanding of the brain’s structural and functional anatomy, expanding its value in the clinical care of patients with cerebrovascular diseases. For example, in this issue, Zerweck et al. showed that an MRI-Based Assessment of Risk for Stroke in Moyamoya Angiopathy (MARS-MMA) system, including impaired breath-hold functional MRI and arterial wall contrast enhancement, is associated with impaired [15O] water PET cerebral perfusion reserve capacity. They propose that such an MRI scoring system might be a promising tool to predict the risk of stroke in Moyamoya Angiopathy [3]. The study by Chauvet et al. highlights the potential of non-contrast-enhanced 4D MR angiography as a diagnostic tool for vascular malformation in the brain with comparable accuracy to contrast-enhanced 4D MR angiography [4]. Dr. Kulcsar’s team showed the potential role of thrombotic clot dynamic perviousness, which is a measure of clot CT attenuation at multiple timepoints after intravenous contrast administration to predict clot tissue composition [5] and revascularization rate after mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion stroke [6]. And brain MR spectroscopy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage showed lower cerebral magnesium and higher pH levels in patients who developed clinically significant vasospasm.

2. Machine Learning and Omics Analysis

Over the past decade, machine learning and omics analysis have transformed the landscape of cerebrovascular disease by enabling more precise, data-driven approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Omics analysis, including genomics, proteomics, radiomics, and metabolomics, facilitates the identification of novel biomarkers and individualized risk profiles in cerebrovascular disease. In this issue, Avery et al. reported the prognostic role of machine learning radiomics signature of admission CT angiography scans in the prediction of collateral status and outcome in large vessel occlusion stroke [7], and Zaman et al. showed that radiomics of cerebral hematoma on admission head CT of hemorrhagic stroke patients can provide more accurate survival prediction than benchmark risk scores [8]. A combination of imaging and clinical factors in multi-modal models can provide prognostic information and guide treatment in cerebrovascular disease [9,10].

3. Interventional Innovations

Recent advances in neurovascular intervention have significantly improved the management and outcomes of cerebrovascular diseases, including acute ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, and aneurysms. The development of next-generation stent retrievers, aspiration catheters, and flow diverters has enhanced the safety, efficacy, and speed of endovascular treatments. Mechanical thrombectomy has become the standard of care for large vessel occlusions, with extended eligibility for large infarct core infarcts in recent trials [11]. Recent trials also showed novel clinical applications of endovascular embolization in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma, traditionally managed with surgical evacuation with high recurrence rates and complications. The EMBOLISE trial demonstrated that middle meningeal artery embolization is a safe and effective adjunct or alternative to surgery, significantly reducing hematoma recurrence and the need for repeat interventions [12]. Studies in this Special Issue also reported recent advancements and results of intervention and results of carotid artery stenting, [13] mechanical thrombectomy [14], cerebral aneurysm coiling [15], and endovascular treatment of vertebro-vertebral arteriovenous fistula [16]. Development of novel devices, improvement of endovascular surgical techniques, and post-treatment care have enhanced the precision and safety of interventions in cerebrovascular disease. These innovations, combined with real-time imaging guidance, have minimized procedural risks and improved patient outcomes.

4. Future Directions and Challenges

While the advancements highlighted in this issue are promising, several challenges remain. The integration of multimodal imaging data into cohesive diagnostic and treatment frameworks requires standardized protocols and collaborative efforts across disciplines. Additionally, ensuring equitable access to cutting-edge technologies is essential to prevent disparities in care. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies that assess the long-term impact of these innovations on patient outcomes. Furthermore, the ethical implications of artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making warrant careful consideration, ensuring that technological advancements augment clinician expertise.

5. Conclusions

This Special Issue in Diagnostics highlights some of the recent innovations in cerebrovascular imaging and interventions. Applications of new imaging modalities, the use of computer vision and data science analytics, and improved surgical devices and techniques can advance cerebrovascular patient care. Novel MRI technologies, quantitative neuroimage analysis, image-guided interventions, and evidence-based treatments have the potential to improve the diagnosis, therapy, and recovery of patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Funding

S.P. has received funding from the NIH (K23NS118056) and Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2020097).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Feigin, V.L.; Abate, M.D.; Abate, Y.H.; Abd ElHafeez, S.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdelalim, A.; Abdelkader, A.; Abdelmasseh, M.; Abd-Elsalam, S.; Abdi, P.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024, 23, 973–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Roth, G.A.; Mensah, G.A.; Johnson, C.O.; Addolorato, G.; Ammirati, E.; Baddour, L.M.; Barengo, N.C.; Beaton, A.Z.; Benjamin, E.J.; Benziger, C.P.; et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 2982–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zerweck, L.; Roder, C.; Blazhenets, G.; Martus, P.; Thurow, J.; Haas, P.; Estler, A.; Gohla, G.; Ruff, C.; Selo, N.; et al. MRI-Based Assessment of Risk for Stroke in Moyamoya Angiopathy (MARS-MMA): An MRI-Based Scoring System for the Severity of Moyamoya Angiopathy. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chauvet, G.; Cheddad El Aouni, M.; Magro, E.; Sabardu, O.; Ben Salem, D.; Gentric, J.C.; Ognard, J. Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Time-Resolved MR Angiography to Assess Angioarchitectural Classification Features of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Anagnostakou, V.; Toth, D.; Bertalan, G.; Muller, S.; Reimann, R.R.; Epshtein, M.; Madjidyar, J.; Thurner, P.; Schubert, T.; Wegener, S.; et al. Dynamic Perviousness Has Predictive Value for Clot Fibrin Content in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Toth, D.F.; Bertalan, G.; Heinz, P.; Madjidyar, J.; Thurner, P.; Schubert, T.; Kulcsar, Z. Dynamic Perviousness: A Novel Imaging Marker for Predicting Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Avery, E.W.; Abou-Karam, A.; Abi-Fadel, S.; Behland, J.; Mak, A.; Haider, S.P.; Zeevi, T.; Sanelli, P.C.; Filippi, C.G.; Malhotra, A.; et al. Radiomics-Based Prediction of Collateral Status from CT Angiography of Patients Following a Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zaman, S.; Dierksen, F.; Knapp, A.; Haider, S.P.; Abou Karam, G.; Qureshi, A.I.; Falcone, G.J.; Sheth, K.N.; Payabvash, S. Radiomic Features of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage on Non-Contrast CT Associated with Patient Survival. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abou Karam, G.; Chen, M.C.; Zeevi, D.; Harms, B.C.; Torres-Lopez, V.M.; Rivier, C.A.; Malhotra, A.; de Havenon, A.; Falcone, G.J.; Sheth, K.N.; et al. Time-Dependent Changes in Hematoma Expansion Rate after Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Its Relationship with Neurological Deterioration and Functional Outcome. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lu, W.Z.; Lin, H.A.; Hou, S.K.; Lin, S.F. ABCD2-I Score Predicts Unplanned Emergency Department Revisits within 72 Hours Due to Recurrent Acute Ischemic Stroke. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chen, H.; Lee, J.S.; Michel, P.; Yan, B.; Chaturvedi, S. Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy for Patients with Large Ischemic Core: A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2024, 81, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Davies, J.M.; Knopman, J.; Mokin, M.; Hassan, A.E.; Harbaugh, R.E.; Khalessi, A.; Fiehler, J.; Gross, B.A.; Grandhi, R.; Tarpley, J.; et al. Adjunctive Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Subdural Hematoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2024, 391, 1890–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, B.K.; Kim, B.; You, S.H.; Ryoo, I.; Jung, H.N. Technical Complications Associated with Embolic Protection Device During Carotid Artery Stenting: Incidence, Risk Factors, Clinical Implications, and Rescue Maneuvers. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, H.; Colasurdo, M.; Khunte, M.; Malhotra, A.; Gandhi, D. Post-Thrombectomy Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Incidence, Predictors, Clinical Relevance, and Effect Modulators. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Suzuki, T.; Hasegawa, H.; Shibuya, K.; Fujiwara, H.; Oishi, M. Clinical and Hemodynamic Features of Aneurysm Rupture in Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Withayasuk, P.; Wichianrat, R.; Sangpetngam, B.; Aurboonyawat, T.; Chankaew, E.; Homsud, S.; Churojana, A. Vertebro-Vertebral Arteriovenous Fistulae: A Case Series of Endovascular Management at a Single Center. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Payabvash, S. Advances in Cerebrovascular Imaging and Interventions. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15081045

AMA Style

Payabvash S. Advances in Cerebrovascular Imaging and Interventions. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(8):1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15081045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Payabvash, Seyedmehdi. 2025. "Advances in Cerebrovascular Imaging and Interventions" Diagnostics 15, no. 8: 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15081045

APA Style

Payabvash, S. (2025). Advances in Cerebrovascular Imaging and Interventions. Diagnostics, 15(8), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15081045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop