Next Article in Journal
Convolutional Neural Network-Based Approach for Cobb Angle Measurement Using Mask R-CNN
Previous Article in Journal
Emotional Disorders, Risk Factors, and Correlations of Post-Partum Depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder with Sexual Function During Post-Partum Period
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Multiplex PCR on Diagnosis of Bacterial and Fungal Infections and Choice of Appropriate Antimicrobial Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mapping Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Oman: Phenotypic and Genotypic Insights

1
Department of Microbiology, Suhar Hospital, Ministry of Health, Sohar 100, Oman
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University and Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat 123, Oman
3
Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202001, India
4
Department of Human and Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(9), 1062; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091062
Submission received: 8 February 2025 / Revised: 9 April 2025 / Accepted: 16 April 2025 / Published: 22 April 2025

Abstract

:
Background: Mapping the local etiology and susceptibility of common pathogens causing complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) is important for promoting evidence-based antimicrobial prescribing. Evaluating the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), AmpC beta-lactamase (AmpC), and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPEs) is equally important as it informs treatment guidelines and empiric management. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) enhances antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance by complementing phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing, offering deeper insights into resistance mechanisms, transmissions, and evolutions. Integrating it into routine AMR monitoring can significantly improve global efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of isolates from cUTI were collected from patients presenting with Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat and Suhar Hospital, Suhar, Oman. Automated systems as well as manual methods were used for detection of ESBL, AmpC, and CPE. ESBLs, AmpC β-lactamases, and CPEs were further detected by manual methods: double-disk synergy test for ESBL; disk approximation assay and D69C AmpC detection set for AmpC, and mCIM and KPC/IMP/NDM/VIM/OXA-48 Combo test kit for CPE. WGS was carried out in 11 FOX-resistant E. coli and (22 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae) isolates with varying susceptibilities to identify circulating clades, AMR genes, and plasmids. Bioinformatic analysis was performed using online tools. Results: The susceptibility patterns of E. coli from cUTI were as follows: nitrofurantoin (96%), fosfomycin (100%), fluoroquinolones (44%), aminoglycosides (93%), piperacillin-tazobactam (95%), and carbapenems (98%). In comparison, susceptibility rates of K. pneumoniae were far lower: nitrofurantoin (38%), fosfomycin (89%), aminoglycosides (82%), piperacillin-tazobactam (72%), and carbapenems (83%). K. pneumoniae, however, was more susceptible to fluoroquinolones at 47% in comparison to E. coli. The prevalence of ESBL among E. coli and K. pneumoniae was 37.2% and CRE was 6.2% while the estimated prevalence of AmpC was 5.4%. It was observed that E. coli was the predominant ESBL and AmpC producer, while K. pneumoniae was the major carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CREs) producer. No predominant multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) lineage was observed in AmpC-producing E. coli with nine E. coli MLST lineages being identified from eleven isolates: ST-10, ST-69, ST-77, ST-131, ST-156, ST-167, ST-361, ST-1125, and ST-2520. On the other hand, a less diverse MLST spectrum (ST-2096, ST-231, ST-147, ST-1770, and ST-111) was observed in the CRE K. pneumoniae. Among the five MLST lineages, ST-2096 (twelve isolates) and ST-147 (seven isolates) predominated. WGS revealed that DHA-1 was the predominant plasmid-mediated AmpC gene in E. coli, while OXA-232 and NDM-5 were the most common carbapenemase genes in K. pneumoniae. All E. coli DHA-1-positive isolates co-harbored the quinolone resistance gene qnrB4 and the sulfonamide resistance gene sul1 while no aminoglycoside resistance genes were detected. The majority of CPE CRE K. pneumoniae carried other β-lactamase genes, such as blaCTX-M-15, blaSHV, and blaTEM; all co-harbored the quinolone resistance gene OqxAB; and 77% carried the aminoglycoside resistance gene armA. Conclusions: Our results suggest that fosfomycin is an excellent empiric choice for treating complicated cystitis caused by both E. coli and K. pneumoniae, while nitrofurantoin is an appropriate choice for E. coli cystitis but not for K. pneumoniae. Aminoglycosides and piperacillin-tazobactam are excellent intravenous alternatives that spare carbapenems. DHA-1 was the predominant AmpC in E. coli, while OXA-232 and NDM-5 were the predominant carbapenemases in K. pneumoniae. In AmpC-producing E. coli, no MLST predominated, suggesting a significant flux in E. coli with lack of stable clades in this region. In contrast, ST-2096 and ST-147 predominated in CRE Klebsiella pneumoniae, suggesting a stable circulation of these in Oman. WGS profiling provides a deeper understanding of the genetic basis of resistance and enhances surveillance and offers comprehensive insights into pathogen evolution and transmission patterns.

1. Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) rank among the most prevalent bacterial infections worldwide, affecting millions annually and imposing significant healthcare and economic burdens [1,2]. Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are associated with structural, functional, or metabolic abnormalities of the genitourinary tract and are linked with greater resistance [3]. The increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in these pathogens has led to reduced treatment efficacy, longer hospital stays, and higher morbidity. While there are numerous global reports worldwide pertaining to the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in simple UTIs, there are few that report susceptibility rates in complicated UTIs [3,4]. Relying on local antibiograms of uncomplicated UTIs to treat cUTIs may lead to inappropriate empirical therapy leading to poor outcomes as cUTIs have an increased risk of being associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens [5,6]. Hence, antibiograms specific to cUTIs are essential for optimum empirical therapy [3].
While antimicrobial susceptibility testing provides phenotypic resistance profiles, it does not identify specific genetic determinants, making it difficult to track resistance evolution or predict resistance before it manifests. Phenotypic methods may not detect low-expression resistance genes, silent mutations, or emerging mechanisms of resistance. WGS offers a more comprehensive approach, enabling the identification of AMR genes, horizontal gene transfer events, and clonal relationships between strains. Comprehensive WGS profiling of cUTIs will shed much needed light about AMR evolution at the genomic level in this region.
MDR is defined as acquired non-susceptibility to ≥1 agent in three or more different classes of antimicrobials, while XDR is defined as being non-susceptible to ≥1 agent in all but remaining susceptible to two or fewer antimicrobial classes [7]. These infections are predominantly caused by Gram-negative bacilli, including E. coli and K. pneumoniae, which frequently exhibit varying levels of resistance through mechanisms such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production, AmpC beta-lactamase, and carbapenemase activity [8,9].
The lack of diagnostic precision in identifying these resistance markers often leads to inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions, further fueling resistance. As WGS becomes more accessible, its application is poised to bridge existing knowledge gaps in AMR surveillance, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes and public health strategies. Routine identification of the resistance mechanisms will undoubtedly promote antimicrobial stewardship and judicious use of reserve antibiotics.
This study (i) evaluates the susceptibility profile of E coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from cUTIs to inform practice, (ii) identifies cheap, simple, and reliable tools to detect extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL), AmpC beta-lactamases and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPEs) in resource-constrained settings, and (iii) identifies the circulating MLST, AMR genes, and plasmids in AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing strains by whole genome sequencing of representative isolates in Oman.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Period and Setting

This study was conducted from September 2022 to August 2023 at the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman, in collaboration with Clinical Microbiology Laboratories at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) and Suhar Hospital, Oman. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC), College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University (REF. NO. SQU-EC/377/2021), and the Health Studies and Research Approval Committee, Ministry of Health (MoH/CSR/21/24496).

2.2. Study Design

The study evaluated the demographic and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from cUTI cases in both the hospitals. UTIs in pregnant women, men, children, and patients with an indwelling urinary catheter, renal disease, immunocompromised status, or with an anatomical or functional abnormality of the urinary tract were categorized as cUTIs. ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase production were identified both by automated systems as well as manual methods. Genomic profiling was carried out in representative AmpC and CRE isolates to acquire in-depth knowledge of the spectrum of resistance harbored and the prevalent clades and plasmids carried.

2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria: Consecutive, non-duplicate E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from cUTI cases were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria: E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from patients presenting with simple UTIs, infectious etiology other than E. coli and K. pneumoniae in cUTI.

2.4. Sample Size

Over 1194 samples were received from cases of cUTI over the period of one year.

2.5. Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

All the clinical samples were processed as per standard guidelines. Bacterial identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker, Munich, Germany) and Phoenix™ (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) automated systems at SQUH, while VITEK 2 (Biomérieux, Tokyo, Japan) was employed at Suhar Hospital as per standard guidelines [10,11,12]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed and interpreted following CLSI guidelines (2022) [13]. The automated systems identified the isolates as ESBLs. Carbapenem-resistant isolates were subjected to GeneXpert® Carba-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for confirmation of carbapenemase production, while AmpC was inferred on the basis of susceptibility profile and confirmed by manual detection methods.

2.6. Manual Phenotypic Detection of ESBL, AmpC, and CPE

We performed manual methods for detection of ESBL, AmpC, and CPE in duplicate.
ESBL Detection: The double-disk synergy method was utilized for identifying ESBLs. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC, 20/10 μg) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) was placed at the center of Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA), and ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 μg) (Oxoid, UK), cefepime (FEP, 30 μg) (Oxoid, UK), aztreonam (ATM, 30 μg) (Oxoid, UK), cefotaxime (CTX, 30 μg) (Oxoid, UK), cefuroxime (CXM, 30 μg) (Oxoid, UK), cefoxitin (FOX, 30 µg) ceftriaxone (CRO, 30 μg) (Oxoid, UK), cefoperazone (CFP, 75 μg) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy), and cefpodoxime (CPD, 30 μg) (Liofilchem, Italy) were placed at a distance of 20 mm (edge to edge) from AMC. The synergistic activities between AMC and β-lactam antibiotics were observed after incubating the plates at 35 ± 2 °C for 18–24 h. Isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers when a clear extension of the edge of the inhibition zone of any of the β-lactam antibiotics was observed towards AMC or when a zone of inhibition appeared in between β-lactam antibiotic and AMC, Figure 1A(i) [14,15].
AmpC detection: Two methods were utilized for detection of AmpC beta-lactamases: disk approximation test and AmpC detection set (D69C).
Disk approximation test: This was an in-house test. A ceftazidime disk (CAZ, 30 μg) (Oxoid, UK) was placed in the center of the inoculated MHA and disks of the inducing substrates: imipenem (IPM, 10 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC 20/10 µg), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP 110 µg) were placed at a distance of 20 mm apart (edge to edge) from a ceftazidime disk, while the distance between cefoxitin (FOX, 30 µg) and ceftazidime disk was adjusted to 15 mm apart (edge to edge) to attain better induction [16,17]. The plates were incubated at 35 °C ± 2 for 18–24 h. AmpC was identified by the flattening of the zone of inhibition towards ceftazidime, as seen in Figure 1A(ii).
AmpC detection set (D69C): This is a commercial AmpC detection set from Mast Group Ltd., Bootle, UK. The set contained three cartridges A, B, and C. The disk content of cartridge A is cefpodoxime (10 µg) with AmpC inducer; in cartridge B, the disk contains cefpodoxime (10 µg) with AmpC inducer and ESBL inhibitor; and in cartridge D, the disk composed of cefpodoxime (10 µg) with AmpC inducer, ESBL inhibitor, and AmpC inhibitors. The inducers and inhibitors in each cartridge were unspecified. The procedure was performed and interpreted as per the manufacturer’s instructions [18] as seen in Figure 1A(iii).
Carbapenemase detection: Two methods were utilized for detection of CPE: modified carbapenem inactivation method and a lateral flow immunochromatographic assay.
Modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM): The modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) was performed as per CLSI 2023 [19] as seen in Figure 1B(i).
Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay: KPC/IMP/NDM/VIM/OXA-48 Combo test kit (Medomics, Nanjing, China) is a lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) developed for the specific detection of the five most common carbapenemases (KPC, IMP, NDM, VIM, and OXA-48) using a double-antibody sandwich assay. The procedure was performed, and the results were interpreted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Figure 1B(ii) shows some of the results obtained.

2.7. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)

As WGS enhances AMR surveillance by complementing phenotypic AST, offering deeper insights into resistance mechanisms, transmissions, and evolutions, we carried out this baseline study in cUTI in Oman.
The isolates for whole genome sequencing were collected from Sultan Qaboos University and Sohar Hospital. Both cater to a diverse population representative of many regions of Oman. Since we have limited information on AmpC and CRE in cUTI, we selected isolates with varying susceptibility profiles in order to obtain a heterogenous flavor of the circulating clades.
Thus, representative 11 AmpC and 22 CRE E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains were subjected to WGS. DNA was extracted from an overnight culture using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for whole genome sequencing. The manufacturer’s protocol was followed with slight modifications. For highly mucoid K. pneumoniae isolates, a pre-lysis step was performed, which included the preparation of a pre-lysis buffer consisting of 100 μL of Tris//EDTA (TE) buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 1.00 μL lysozyme 10 mg/mL (final concentration 0.1 mg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.20 μL lysostaphin 10 mg/mL (final concentration 0.02 mg/mL) (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA), and 0.10 μL RNAse A 100 mg/mL (final concentration 0.1 mg/mL) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The bacterial suspension from an overnight culture was centrifuged at 8000× g for 2 min, and the pelleted bacterial cells were resuspended in 100 μL of the pre-lysis buffer by pipetting up and down several times with a P200 pipette. The suspension was then incubated for 60 min. After incubation, 1.00 μL of Proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added as a final step in the pre-lysis stage. The sample was then ready for the first step of the Qiagen DNA extraction protocol. After DNA quantification by NanoDrop (ThermoFisher Scientific 1000 NanoDrop Spectrophotometer), the samples were sent to microbes NG in the UK for WGS by Illumina next-generation sequencing (https://microbesng.co.uk, Birmingham, UK) accessed on 3 October 2023. The DNA samples were prepared and then sequenced following the manufacturer’s protocol. ILLUMINA SEQUENCING (SGS and EGS) Genomic DNA libraries are prepared using the Nextera XT Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol with the following modifications: input DNA is increased two-fold, and PCR elongation time is increased to 45 s. DNA quantification and library preparation are carried out on a Hamilton Microlab STAR automated liquid handling system (Hamilton Bonaduz AG, Bonaduz, Switzerland). Pooled libraries are quantified using the Kapa Biosystems Library Quantification Kit for Illumina. Libraries are sequenced using Illumina sequencers (HiSeq/NovaSeq, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using a 250 bp paired-end protocol. Reads are adapter trimmed using Trimmomatic 0.30 with a sliding window quality cutoff of Q15. De novo assembly is performed on samples using SPAdes version 3.7 [20], and contigs are annotated using Prokka 1.11 [21]. The assembled and annotated sequences were uploaded to the website to carry out further analysis.
Detailed resistance gene profiling, with bioinformatics analysis, was conducted using Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) website (https://www.genomicepidemiology.org/) accessed on 17 November 2023 for identifying multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) using MLST tool [22], plasmids using PlasmidFinder tool [23], and antibiotic resistance genes using ResFinder tool [24]. All the genome sequences were submitted to NCBI and accession numbers were awaited. The bio sample accessions are provided in Supplementary Document S1. E. coli MG 1655 RJF293 (GenBank accession NZ_JARVXJ000000000, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/) [accessed on 4 December 2023] and K. pneumoniae RJF293 (GenBank accession number CP014008, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/) [accessed on 4 December 2023] references were used. iTOL was used to visualize and annotate the tree.

2.8. Statistical Analyses

Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 23). Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD, while categorical variables were presented as percentages. Sensitivity and specificity analyses of diagnostic tests were performed, and results were visualized using Microsoft Excel.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics

Among the 1194 non-duplicate cases of cUTIs, the majority, 60% (712), were females and 40% (482) males. cUTI predominance was observed in the >60 year age group (47.2%), followed by 30–60 year (32.7%) and ≤13 year (10.7%) age groups. Key complicating factors were urinary instrumentation, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, sickle cell anemia, malignancy, renal stones, urinary obstruction, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and thalassemia. A total of 1233 bacterial isolates were identified, among which E. coli predominated, 406 (33%) followed by K. pneumoniae 163 (13.5%). E. coli predominated among both adults (35.5%) and children (49.4%). In catheter specimen urine samples, Candida spp. predominated in adults (41.9%).

3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles

E. coli exhibited excellent susceptibility to fosfomycin (100%), nitrofurantoin (96%), piperacillin-tazobactam (95%), gentamicin (87%), amikacin (98%), and meropenem (99%). K. pneumoniae had lower susceptibility rates than E. coli, with significantly low (38%) susceptibility to nitrofurantoin. Fosfomycin rates were 89%, meropenem and amikacin 84%, and gentamicin 80%, as shown in Table 1.
The susceptibility rates to cephalosporins was slightly lower in E. coli [cefazolin (27%), cefuroxime (51%), ceftriaxone (54%), ceftazidime (57%), and cefepime (56%)] than in K. pneumoniae [cefazolin (33%), cefuroxime (55%), ceftriaxone (61%), ceftazidime (60%), and cefepime (63%)]. Similar susceptibilities to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (66% and 65%) and cotrimoxazole (63% and 65%) were observed in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively. Lower susceptibility was observed for ciprofloxacin (44%) and levofloxacin (46%).
The manual phenotypic methods for detection of ESBL and CPE fully concurred with the results obtained by automated systems. The D69C method better detected de-repressed AmpC, while the disk approximation test was equally good in detecting inducible AmpC.

3.3. Prevalence of ESBL, AmpC Beta-Lactamases, and Carbapenemases in cUTI

ESBL: The overall prevalence of ESBL among E. coli and K. pneumoniae (n = 569) was 37.2%, with E. coli accounting for 40.4% and K. pneumoniae 20.2% (Table 2). The ESBL prevalence increased to 43.8% in E. coli and 20.8% when isolates co-harboring ESBL and AmpC were included.
AmpC: AmpC alone was identified in 16 (2.8%) isolates, while AmpC and ESBL co-carriage was identified in 15 (2.6%) cases.
Carbapenemases: The overall prevalence of carbapenemase producers was 35 (6.2%). K. pneumoniae was the predominant carbapenemase producer, accounting for 17.2% of the total K. pneumoniae isolated, compared to E. coli 1.7%, as shown in Table 2.

3.4. In Silico Identification of Resistance Genes from Genomic Sequences of AmpC-Producing E. coli

The MLST analysis of the AmpC strains identified the presence of nine E. coli lineages: ST-10, ST-69, ST-77, ST-131, ST-156, ST-167, ST-361, ST-1125, and ST-2520, with ST-10 and ST-69 being observed in two isolates each.
Diverse antimicrobial resistance genes were detected in the AmpC-producing E. coli. Four beta-lactam resistance genes blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B, and blaTEM-35 were identified (Table 3). The blaDHA-1 gene encoding the DHA-1 AmpC beta-lactamase was the sole AmpC gene identified in the nine isolates. Among the two FOX-resistant isolates that tested negative for AmpC genes, one co-harbored blaCTX-M-15 and blaOXA-1, and the other carried blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-1B, and blaTEM-35 (Table 3). Three AmpC producers were resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam, one carried blaOXA-1 while the others co-harbored several β-lactamases. The predominant quinolone resistance gene was qnrB4, while the other two were aac(6′)-Ib-cr and qnrS1. Most isolates carried one of the quinolone resistance genes. Five ciprofloxacin susceptible isolates also carried the qnrB4 gene. The tetracycline resistance genes (tet(A) and tet(B)) were detected in seven isolates with tet(A) being the most frequent. Aminoglycoside resistance was infrequent with one isolate carrying aac(3)-IIa and aadA5 and the other aph(3″)-Ib and aph(6)-Id.
The marA gene, which is responsible for antibiotic efflux and reduced cellular permeability to antibiotics, was carried by all but one isolate. The most frequently detected efflux pump genes belonged to resistance–nodulation–cell division (RND) and major facilitator superfamily (MFS) efflux gene families (Supplementary Table S1). H-NS, which confers resistance to macrolides, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, cephamycins, penams, and tetracyclines, predominated among the efflux genes followed closely by evgA, TolC, and emrB. Four antibiotic target alteration genes were detected (bacA, PmrF, ugd, and eptA), among which PmrF predominated.
Plasmid identification in E. coli: Ten different plasmids were detected among the eleven FOX-resistant E. coli with nine having one or more plasmids and two with none. IncFIB(AP001918) predominated (7/11) followed by IncFII (5/11), IncFIA (3/11), Col(BS512), IncFII(pRSB107), and IncI1-I(Alpha) identified in two isolates each. The other four plasmids, Col(IMGS31), IncB/O/K/Z, IncY, and p0111, were detected in isolated strains.

3.5. In Silico Identification of Resistance Genes from Genomic Sequences of Carbapenemase-Producing K. pneumoniae

Among the five MLST lineages identified, (ST-2096, ST-231, ST-147, ST-1770, and ST-11), ST-2096 (12/22) and ST-147 (7/22) predominated. The ST-1770 was identified as Klebsiella quasipneumoniae. The resistance genes’ heat map was prepared utilizing ResFinder, as shown in Table 4.
The β-lactam resistance genes predominated with as many as 18 different β-lactam resistance genes being identified (blaSHV-11, blaSHV-28, blaSHV-40, blaSHV-56, blaSHV-67, blaSHV-89, blaSHV-106, blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M-8, blaCTX-M-15, blaDHA-1, blaOXA-1, blaOXA-9, blaOXA-48, blaOXA-232, blaNDM-5, blaKPC-2, and blaOKP-B-3).
Among the carbapenemases, blaOXA-232 predominated (11/22), followed by blaNDM-5 (5/22). Single isolate carriage of blaOXA-48 and blaKPC-2 (ST-1770) was observed. All ST-2096 K. pneumoniae carried blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaSHV-28, and blaSHV-106 while ST-147 carried blaSHV-11 and blaSHV-67. Co-carriage of blaDHA-1 and blaCTX-M-8, blaSHV-40, bla-SHV56, and bla-SHV89 was observed in a carbapenem-resistant CPE-negative isolate. One carbapenem-resistant isolate (K. pneumoniae 1776) was notable for not carrying any carbapenemase genes. On the contrary, it carried blaDHA-1, blaCTX-M-8, blaSHV-40, bla-SHV56, and bla-SHV89. Eight aminoglycoside resistance genes (aac(6′)-Ib, aadA1, aadA2, aph(3′)-Ia, ph(3′)-VI, aph(6)-Id, armA, and rmtF) were identified, and the majority (17/22) carried the armA gene. The rmtF gene was detected only in one isolate. Eighteen isolates resistant to gentamicin, netilmicin, and amikacin harbored 16S rRNA methyltransferase (17 carried armA, 1 carried rmtF).
Six fluoroquinolone resistance genes were identified: aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, OqxA, and OqxB. All isolates carried OqxA and OqxB, and 13 co-harboured aac(6′)-Ib-cr. The mdtq gene, responsible for antibiotic efflux and reduced cellular permeability, was detected in all isolates except one (Supplementary Table S2). Four additional efflux pumps, lptD, Klebsiella pneumoniae kpnE, Klebsiella pneumoniae kpnF (22/22), and qacEdelta1 (18/22), were detected by RGI.
Plasmid profiling in K. pneumoniae: In the CPE K. pneumoniae, seventeen different plasmids were identified with each strain carrying one or more plasmids with one isolate remarkably carrying seven different plasmids. Overall, IncFIB (pNDM-Mar) and IncHI1B (pNDM-MAR) predominated, found in 16/22 isolates each, followed by IncFIB (K) (15/22), ColKP3 (11/22), IncFIB (pKPHS1) (6/22), IncR (5 isolates), IncFIB (pQil) (3/22), and repB(R1701) (2/22). The remaining plasmids, IncFIB(K), Pcav 1099-114, InFII, InFII(K), InFII(pCRY), IncI1-I(Alpha), IncN, IncX3, IncX4, and Col4401 were detected in isolated strains.

4. Discussion

Mapping antimicrobial susceptibility of uropathogens in cUTI is imperative in order to institute optimum empiric treatment. cUTIs are at a higher risk of treatment failure, as these infections are frequently associated with MDR Gram-negative bacteria [25]. E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the two most common uropathogens in cUTIs, are frequently associated with β-lactamases such as ESBLs, AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases [26]. Optimizing the detection of these resistance markers through phenotypic and genotypic tools is critical for appropriate management of cUTIs and for promoting antimicrobial stewardship. Automated systems like Phoenix or Vitek do not detect AmpC beta-lactamases, and manual methods for detecting AmpC may be utilized. A previous study by this group highlighted that these manual methods have good specificity and sensitivity [16].
This study reveals key differences in the susceptibility rates of these two pathogens. E. coli exhibited significantly higher susceptibility rates to nitrofurantoin (96%) compared to K. pneumoniae (38%). However, both displayed comparable rates to fosfomycin (100% vs. 89%). Babiker et al. (2019) [27] advocated fosfomycin as a good option for management of UTIs. Both nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin cause low collateral damage and have a broad antimicrobial spectrum. Both pathogens exhibited unsatisfactory susceptibility to cotrimoxazole and fluoroquinolones (60% and 50%, respectively), which significantly limits their utility in empiric management. Similar rates were reported by Li et al. (2017) [25]. Susceptibility to cephalosporins was slightly lower in E. coli [cefazolin (27%), cefuroxime (51%), ceftriaxone (54%), ceftazidime (57%), and cefepime (56%)] than in K. pneumoniae [cefazolin (33%), cefuroxime (55%), ceftriaxone (61%), ceftazidime (60%), and cefepime (63%)], which indicates higher prevalence of ESBL in E. coli than in K. pneumoniae, which was corroborated by further testing. Mohamed et al. (2020) [28] reported a similar trend.
Conversely, the lower piperacillin-tazobactam, aminoglycoside, and carbapenem susceptibility rates in K. pneumoniae [piperacillin-tazobactam 72%, amikacin (84%), gentamicin (80%), ertapenem (81%), imipenem (83%), and meropenem (84%)] compared to E. coli [piperacillin-tazobactam (95%), amikacin (98%) gentamicin (87%), ertapenem (98%), imipenem (98%), and meropenem (99%)] suggests that K. pneumoniae more frequently carries blaOXA-1, aminoglycoside and carbapenem resistance genes. Fernández-Martínez et al., 2018 [29]; Abo-State et al., 2018 [30]; and Arumugam et al., 2024 [31] corroborated these findings.
We observed a clear dominance of ESBL and AmpC in E. coli and CPE in K. pneumoniae. E. coli ESBL prevalence (43.8%) was more than double that of ESBL (20.8%) in K. pneumoniae. A study from Egypt reported similar findings: a higher prevalence of ESBL (62–69% in E. coli, which was double that in K. pneumoniae (30–37%) [32]. AmpC prevalence too was higher in E. coli (5.9%) than in K. pneumoniae (4.3%). CPE however clearly predominated among K. pneumoniae (17.2% vs. 1.7% in E. coli). AL Mamari et al., 2022 [3], reported similar prevalence in this region. As in other parts of the world, XDR K. pneumoniae is a grave public health concern in Oman [33,34].
A surprisingly pronounced genetic heterogeneity was observed in the AmpC-carrying strains, with nine MLST types observed (ST-10, ST-69, ST-77, ST-131, ST-156, ST-167, ST-361, ST-1125, and ST-2520), indicating a great flux in the circulating E. coli clades in this region. Only ST-167, ST-361, ST-131, and ST-156 have been reported previously from this region [35]. Among these, ST 131 is a globally ubiquitous ST uropathogenic clade associated with CTX-M type of ESBL, while ST 69 is usually sensitive to most antimicrobials [36,37]. It was interesting to note that all E. coli carried plasmid-mediated AmpC gene, blaDHA-1, indicating the endemicity of this gene in Oman. Unpublished data from this group support this finding. Similar high prevalence of blaDHA-1 in uropathogenic E. coli have been reported from Egypt, Iran, and India while Saudi Arabia reported predominance of CMY-2 [38,39,40,41]. It is important to note that there is significant population mobility between Oman, Egypt, Iran, and India, which is mirrored by blaDHA-1 prevalence in these countries.
The rare carriage of aminoglycoside-modifying/resistance genes support the empirical use of gentamicin and amikacin in managing E. coli AmpC-mediated cUTIs, thus sparing carbapenems. On the other hand, quinolones should be prescribed with caution as all isolates carrying bla DHA-1 harbored the qnrB4 gene. Similar findings were reported by Kamruzzaman et al. (2013) [42], who reported that E. coli isolates carried both blaDHA-1 and qnrB genes. Mata et al. (2011) [43] too found a close association between blaDHA-1 and qnrB genes. The aac(6′)-Ib-cr, a multifunctional gene that induces resistance to both ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides, was identified in one isolate only [44].
IncFIB(AP001918) was the predominant plasmid in blaDHA-1-carrying E. coli, followed by IncFII, IncFIA, Col(BS512), IncFII(pRSB107), and IncI1-I(Alpha). Ingti et al. (2017) [45] reported that E. coli harboring the blaDHA-1 AmpC gene was associated with several plasmids IncFIB, IncFIA, IncK, IncL/M, IncHI1, IncB/O, and IncI1, three of which were found in our study too. Among these, the IncI1 plasmids are most commonly associated with antimicrobial resistance and are so common that a typing scheme has been proposed by using plasmid multi-locus sequence typing [23]. Plasmids carrying blaDHA-1 in our study co-harbored qnrB4, mph(A), and sul1 genes, a finding which was corroborated by Hennequin et al., 2018 [46]. Four plasmids, Col(IMGS31), IncB/O/K/Z, IncY, and p0111 were identified in one isolate each. Among these, the p0111 plasmid has been reported to harbor aadA2, drfA12, and tetA, conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, trimethoprim, and tetracycline, respectively [47]. The colicinogenic (Col) plasmid type identified in some isolates usually carry colicin, a toxic protein produced by some strains of E. coli [48]. In two isolates no plasmids were detected although they carried several AMR genes along with the DHA-1 gene. They may be encoded by other MGEs such as integrative conjugative elements or by plasmids integrated into the chromosomes of these isolates.
Multi-locus sequence typing identified five ST lineages in the CPE K. pneumoniae: ST-2096, ST-231, ST-147, ST-1770, and ST-111, among which ST-2096 predominated. These findings are quite different from a previous study in Oman where the majority of XDR/PDR K. pneumoniae were ST-231 [49]. Al Fadhli et al., 2023 [50] reported predominance of ST-14 and ST-231 in the Arabian Peninsula with ST-231 common in Oman and ST-2096 in Saudi Arabia. The constant flux in this region merits regular surveillance. A study from India reported that ST-231 was the predominant ST (34.8%), followed by ST-147 (23.5%) and ST-14 [51]. Long-term studies delineating evolution and transmission of uropathogenic K. pneumoniae are needed to appreciate the changing epidemiology of the circulating clades leading to evolving resistance in this region.
Among the carbapenemases, blaOXA-232 predominated, followed by blaNDM-5, blaOXA-48, and blaKPC-2. All ST-2096 and ST-147 isolates carried the ESBL gene blaCTX-M-15, which reflects the strong association and co-localization of blaOXA232 and blaNDM-5 with blaCTX-M-15 in these clades, an association also observed in other studies [52,53,54]. ST-231 co-harbored ESBL genes blaCTX-M-15 and bla-OXA232, which was also reported by Al-Quraini et al. (2022) [49] and Mancini et al. (2018) [55]. All isolates of ST-2096 carried blaOXA-1 while the majority (6/7) of isolates of ST-147 harbored blaOXA-9. Shankar et al. (2022) [53] found that blaOXA-1 integrated in the chromosome of ST-2096, and Di Pilato et al. (2022) [56] reported blaOXA-1 and blaOXA-9 in ST-147. K. pneumoniae ST-2096 predominantly carried OXA-232 carbapenemase, a frequent variant of OXA-48-like carbapenemase in Oman, while ST-147 predominantly carried NDM-5. Studies from Qatar and India corroborate our findings [52,57]. It is important to note that current screening for carbapenemases in the diagnostic laboratories in Oman is carried out using the Cepheid GeneXpert CARBA-R test, which includes only five genes (OXA-48, KPC, NDM-1, VIM, and IMI) and does not detect OXA-232 or NDM-5, potentially leading to underestimation of these variants in routine diagnostics. Among the CPEs, ST111 alone co-harbored bla-DHA-1 with blaCTX-M-8 and importantly did not carry CPE. No co-carriage of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases was observed among CPE K. pneumoniae.
One isolate of Klebsiella quasipneumoniae (ST-1770) carrying KPC-2 was observed in this study. It is considered an emerging pathogen in healthcare settings, which has the propensity to acquire carbapenemase plasmids [58,59,60]. Venkitapathi et al., 2022 [60], have reported this pathogen in recurrent UTIs in women.
Aminoglycoside resistance was mediated by armA, aac(6′)-Ib, aadA1, aadA2, aph(3′)-Ia, ph(3′)-VI, aph(6)-Id, and rmtF. Alarmingly, the majority (17/22) of the isolates carried the armA gene. Among 16S rRNA methyltransferase genes, armA and rmtB are the most prevalent in Asia [61,62,63]. In contrast, Al-Quraini et al. (2022) [49] detected armA and rmtB genes only in one isolate, which co-harbored blaOXA-232 and bla-NDM-5. These findings indicate the increasing prevalence of plasmids carrying the armA gene among the CPE K. pneumoniae in Oman, which may be attributed to the excessive antimicrobial use during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study indicates the emergence of CPE K. pneumoniae strains harboring armA and rmtF genes that lend resistance to all currently available aminoglycosides, which is a cause of great concern.
Fluoroquinolone resistance was mediated by OqxA and OqxB genes while ST-2096 co-harbored aac(6′)-Ib-cr, and ST-147 predominantly co-harbored qnrS. Shankar et al., 2022 [53] reported similar findings. The aac(6′)-Ib-cr gene was found integrated in the chromosome of K. pneumoniae of ST-2096, which was transferred through MGEs [53]. A study from India reported qnrB, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, oqxA, and oqxB in XDR K. pneumoniae belonging to ST147 [64].
The fosA6 gene was the predominant gene in ST-2096 and ST-231 clones, which agrees with previous studies from California and India [65,66]. On the other hand, the fosA5 gene was only found in the ST-147 clone, similar to Al-Quraini et al.’s report. (2022) [49]. Although all isolates harbored the fosA gene, only four isolates phenotypically expressed resistance to fosfomycin.
The increasing transmission of CPE through conjugative plasmids is a cause of grave public health concern. Among the seventeen different plasmids identified in the CPE K. pneumoniae, IncFIB (pNDM-Mar) and IncHI1B(pNDM-MAR) predominated followed by IncFIB(K), ColKP3, IncFIB(pKPHS1), IncR, IncFIB(pQil), and repB(R1701). The other nine plasmids, IncFIB(K)(Pcav1099-114), InFII, InFII(K), InFII(pCRY), IncI1-I(Alpha), IncN, IncX3, IncX4, and Col4401, featured in individual isolates. This contrasted with findings of Piccirilli et al. (2021) [67], who reported predominance of IncFII(K) followed by IncFIB(K), Col (MG828), and IncFIA(HI1). This highlights the importance of local surveillance of genomic plasmids as studies show there are regional variations in circulation of plasmids. A recent study conducted by Zeng et al. (2022) [68] found that IncFIB(pNDM-Mar) and IncHI1B(pNDM-MAR) commonly harbored blaNDM. Paskova et al. (2018) too reported their role in the dissemination of blaNDM-1, blaSHV-12, blaCTXM-15, and blaOXA-1 among K. pneumoniae in Europe [69]. The IncF plasmids predominated in CPE K. pneumoniae in Italy. This plasmid family is widely prevalent in Enterobacterales of clinical importance [67].
ColKP3 replicon exclusively harbored the bla-OXA-232, a finding corroborated by Shen et al., 2023 [70], who reported ColKP3 in all (100%) and IncFIB-like in 85.2% CPE K. pneumoniae ST231 isolates carrying blaOXA-232 isolates. Interestingly, IncFIB(pKPHS1) was only identified in CPE K. pneumoniae ST147, which is in agreement with Spadar et al. (2022) [71].
Identifying the circulating MLST, AmpC, β-lactamases, CPE, and plasmids at the national level is essential for tracking the molecular epidemiology and transmission of resistance genes, which will aid in developing effective strategies to control the spread. Developing local-focused antibiograms aids in optimizing empiric antimicrobial therapy and in promoting antimicrobial stewardship.

5. Conclusions

Mapping antimicrobial susceptibility of uropathogens causing complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) is critical in order to guide empiric antibiotic therapy, particularly due to the growing resistance. This study highlights significant differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns between E. coli and K. pneumoniae. With its broad spectrum of activity, fosfomycin emerged as an excellent choice for the management of cUTI against both pathogens. On the other hand, while nitrofurantoin continues to be an excellent option for E. coli cystitis, it demonstrated poor activity against K. pneumoniae. Empiric fluoroquinolone therapy is best avoided until susceptibility is confirmed. Regular monitoring of the circulating AMR genes is essential for tracking and controlling the spread of drug-resistant variants. A clear pattern of ESBL and AmpC dominance was observed in E. coli and CPE predominance in K. pneumoniae. The sole AmpC beta-lactamase gene circulating in this region was blaDHA-1, and OXA-232 and NDM-5 were the predominant circulating carbapenemases. Significant MLST heterogeneity was observed in AmpC-producing E. coli while a distinct predominance of ST-2096 and ST-147 was observed in CPE K. pneumoniae, pointing to a stable CPE population. The emergence of CPE K. pneumoniae strains harboring armA and rmtF genes, which are resistant to all currently available aminoglycosides, is an alarming development. The dominance of IncF plasmids, such as IncFIB(AP001918) and IncFIB(pNDM-Mar), underscores their significant role in mediating multidrug resistance, particularly the dissemination of AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing genes among clinical Enterobacterales isolates. Continuous local surveillance of plasmid-mediated antimicrobial resistance is essential along with effective infection prevention control and antimicrobial stewardship measures.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics15091062/s1, Supplementary Document S1: The bio sample accessions numbers; Table S1: Antimicrobial resistance genes and their mechanism of action found in FOX-resistant E. coli using CARD; Table S2: Antimicrobial resistance genes and their mechanism of action found in CRE K. pneumoniae using CARD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and N.A.S.; data curation, N.A.S. and Z.A.J.; formal analysis, M.R. and N.A.S.; investigation, N.A.S. and Z.A.J.; methodology, M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R. and N.A.S.; writing—review and editing, T.A.S., Z.A.J., F.K., S.R.S., Z.A.M., H.S. and M.R.; supervision, M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Sultan Qaboos University internal grant (IG/MED/MICR/24/01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman (SQU-EC/377/23 February 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Kot, B.; Grużewska, A.; Szweda, P.; Wicha, J.; Parulska, U. Antibiotic Resistance of Uropathogens Isolated from Patients Hospitalized in District Hospital in Central Poland in 2020. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. López-Montesinos, I.; Horcajada, J.P. Oral and intravenous fosfomycin in complicated urinary tract infections. Rev. Esp. Quimioter. 2019, 32 (Suppl. S1), 37–44. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Mamari, Y.A.L.; Sami, H.; Siddiqui, K.; Tahir, H.B.; Jabri, Z.A.L.; Muharrmi, Z.A.L.; Rizvi, S.G.; Rizvi, M. Trends of antimicrobial resistance in patients with complicated urinary tract infection: Suggested empirical therapy and lessons learned from a retrospective observational study in Oman. Urol. Ann. 2022, 14, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rizvi, M.; Malhotra, S.; Agarwal, J.; Siddiqui, A.H.; Devi, S.; Poojary, A.; Thakuria, B.; Princess, I.; Sami, H.; Gupta, A.; et al. Regional variations in antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired uropathogenic Escherichia coli in India: Findings of a multicentric study highlighting the importance of local antibiograms. IJID Reg. 2024, 11, 100370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wagenlehner, F.M.E.; Bjerklund Johansen, T.E.; Cai, T.; Koves, B.; Kranz, J.; Pilatz, A.; Tandogdu, Z. Epidemiology, definition and treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2020, 17, 586–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Walkty, A.; Karlowsky, J.A.; Lagace-Wiens, P.; Baxter, M.R.; Adam, H.J.; Zhanel, G.G. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial pathogens recovered from the urine of patients at Canadian hospitals from 2009 to 2020. JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 4, dlac122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zilberberg, M.D.; Nathanson, B.H.; Sulham, K.; Shorr, A.F. Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Cross-Resistance Patterns among Common Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in U.S. Hospitals, 2013 to 2018. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00346-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ruppé, É.; Woerther, P.L.; Barbier, F. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacilli. Ann. Intensive Care 2015, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patel, R. MALDI-TOF MS for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Clin. Chem. 2015, 61, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Funke, G.; Funke-Kissling, P. Evaluation of the new VITEK 2 card for identification of clinically relevant gram-negative rods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 4067–4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Singhal, N.; Kumar, M.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: An emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 32nd ed.; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2022; CLSI Supplement M100; Available online: https://clsi.org/media/wi0pmpke/m100ed32_sample.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2024).
  14. Waheed, A.; Saleem, S.; Shahzad, N.; Akhtar, J.; Saeed, M.; Jameel, I.; Rasheed, F.; Jahan, S. Prevalence of Extended Spectrum [beta]-lactamase SHV and OXA Producing Gram Negative Bacteria at Tertiary Care Hospital of Lahore, Pakistan. Pak. J. Zool. 2019, 51, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Drieux, L.; Brossier, F.; Sougakoff, W.; Jarlier, V. Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae: Review and bench guide. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14 (Suppl. S1), 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Al Mamari, A.M.K.; Al Jabri, Z.; Sami, H.; Rizvi, S.G.A.; Chan, M.F.; Al Siyabi, T.; Al Muharrmi, Z.; Rizvi, M. Evaluation of six commercial and in-house phenotypic tests for detection of AmpC β-lactamases: Is routine detection possible? JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 2023, 5, dlad101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gupta, G.; Tak, V.; Mathur, P. Detection of AmpC β Lactamases in Gram-negative Bacteria. J. Lab. Physicians 2014, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Halstead, F.D.; Vanstone, G.L.; Balakrishnan, I. An evaluation of the Mast D69C AmpC Detection Disc Set for the detection of inducible and derepressed AmpC β-lactamases. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2303–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. CLSI. Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data, 5th ed.; CLSI Guideline M39; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Larsen, M.V.; Cosentino, S.; Rasmussen, S.; Friis, C.; Hasman, H.; Marvig, R.L.; Jelsbak, L.; Sicheritz-Pontén, T.; Ussery, D.W.; Aarestrup, F.M.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; García-Fernández, A.; Voldby Larsen, M.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Hasman, H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F.; et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Gao, W.; Ye, H.; Shen, Z.; Wen, Z.; Wei, J. A 6-year study of complicated urinary tract infections in southern China: Prevalence, antibiotic resistance, clinical and economic outcomes. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2017, 13, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, H.; Palasik, B.N. Combating antimicrobial resistance with cefiderocol for complicated infections involving the urinary tract. Ther. Adv. Urol. 2022, 14, 17562872211065570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Babiker, A.; Clarke, L.; Doi, Y.; Shields, R.K. Fosfomycin for treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens causing urinary tract infection: A real-world perspective and review of the literature. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 95, 114856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mohamed, A.; Mohamud, M.; Mohamud, H. Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Uropathogens in Patients with the Community- and Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections at a Tertiary Hospital in Somalia. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2020, 13, e107453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fernández-Martínez, M.; Ruiz del Castillo, B.; Lecea-Cuello, M.J.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Pascual, Á.; Martínez-Martínez, L. Prevalence of Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzymes in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Producing Extended Spectrum β-Lactamases Collected in Two Multicenter Studies in Spain. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abo-State, M.A.M.; Saleh, Y.E.S.; Ghareeb, H.M. Prevalence and sequence of aminoglycosides modifying enzymes genes among E. coli and Klebsiella species isolated from Egyptian hospitals. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018, 11, 408–415. [Google Scholar]
  31. Arumugam, K.; Karande, G.S.; Patil, S.R. Prevalence of Carbapenemase Production Among Klebsiella and Escherichia coli Isolated from Urinary Tract Infections. Cureus 2024, 16, e70918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shash, R.Y.; Elshimy, A.A.; Soliman, M.Y.; Mosharafa, A.A. Molecular Characterization of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Egyptian Patients with Community- and Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2019, 100, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaza, P.; Xavier, B.B.; Mahindroo, J.; Singh, N.; Baker, S.; Nguyen, T.N.T.; Mavuduru, R.S.; Mohan, B.; Taneja, N. Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Associated with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection in Northern India. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2024, 77, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chapelle, C.; Gaborit, B.; Dumont, R.; Dinh, A.; Vallée, M. Treatment of UTIs Due to Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producers: How to Use New Antibiotic Drugs? A Narrative Review. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Al Farsi, H.M.; Camporeale, A.; Ininbergs, K.; Al-Azri, S.; Al-Muharrmi, Z.; Al-Jardani, A.; Giske, C.G. Clinical and molecular characteristics of carbapenem non-susceptible Escherichia coli: A nationwide survey from Oman. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Matsui, Y.; Hu, Y.; Rubin, J.; de Assis, R.S.; Suh, J.; Riley, L.W. Multilocus sequence typing of Escherichia coli isolates from urinary tract infection patients and from fecal samples of healthy subjects in a college community. Microbiologyopen 2020, 9, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Doumith, M.; Day, M.; Ciesielczuk, H.; Hope, R.; Underwood, A.; Reynolds, R.; Wain, J.; Livermore, D.M.; Woodford, N. Rapid identification of major Escherichia coli sequence types causing urinary tract and bloodstream infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mohamed, E.S.; Khairy, R.M.M.; Abdelrahim, S.S. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of ESBL and AmpC β -lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from UTIs in Egypt. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jomehzadeh, N.; Ahmadi, K.; Rahmani, Z. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates in southwestern Iran. Osong Public. Health Res. Perspect. 2021, 12, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mohamudha, P.R.; Harish, B.N.; Parija, S.C. Molecular description of plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases among nosocomial isolates of Escherichia coli & Klebsiella pneumoniae from six different hospitals in India. Indian. J. Med. Res. 2012, 135, 114–119. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bala, R.; Singh, V.A.; Gupta, N.; Rakshit, P. Prevalence, multidrug-resistance and risk factors for AmpC β-lactamases producing Escherichia coli from hospitalized patients. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2020, 14, 1466–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kamruzzaman, M.; Shoma, S.; Bari, S.M.N.; Ginn, A.N.; Wiklendt, A.M.; Partridge, S.R.; Faruque, S.M.; Iredell, J.R. Genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from environmental surface water in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 76, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mata, C.; Miró, E.; Toleman, M.; Rivera, M.A.; Walsh, T.R.; Navarro, F. Association of blaDHA-1 and qnrB genes carried by broad-host-range plasmids among isolates of Enterobacteriaceae at a Spanish hospital. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1514–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Eftekhar, F.; Seyedpour, S.M. Prevalence of qnr and aac(6′)-Ib-cr Genes in Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella Pneumoniae from Imam Hussein Hospital in Tehran. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 40, 515–521. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ingti, B.; Laskar, M.A.; Choudhury, S.; Maurya, A.P.; Paul, D.; Talukdar, A.D.; Choudhury, M.D.; Dhar, D.; Chakravarty, A.; Bhattacharjee, A. Molecular and in silico analysis of a new plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase (CMH-2) in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 48, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hennequin, C.; Ravet, V.; Robin, F. Plasmids carrying DHA-1 β-lactamases. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 37, 1197–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kao, C.Y.; Chen, J.W.; Liu, T.L.; Yan, J.J.; Wu, J.J. Comparative Genomics of Escherichia coli Sequence Type 219 Clones from the Same Patient: Evolution of the IncI1 blaCMY-Carrying Plasmid in Vivo. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cascales, E.; Buchanan, S.K.; Duché, D.; Kleanthous, C.; Lloubès, R.; Postle, K.; Riley, M.; Slatin, S.; Cavard, D. Colicin biology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 158–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. AL-Quraini, M.; Rizvi, M.; AL-Jabri, Z.; Sami, H.; AL-Muzahmi, M.; AL-Muharrmi, Z.; Taneja, N.; Al-Busaidi, I.; Soman, R. Assessment of In-Vitro Synergy of Fosfomycin with Meropenem, Amikacin and Tigecycline in Whole Genome Sequenced Extended and Pan Drug Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae: Exploring A Colistin Sparing Protocol. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Al Fadhli, A.H.; Mouftah, S.F.; Jamal, W.Y.; Rotimi, V.O.; Ghazawi, A. Cracking the Code: Unveiling the Diversity of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clones in the Arabian Peninsula through Genomic Surveillance. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nagaraj, G.; Shamanna, V.; Govindan, V.; Rose, S.; Sravani, D.; Akshata, K.P.; Shincy, M.R.; Venkatesha, V.T.; Abrudan, M.; Argimón, S.; et al. High-Resolution Genomic Profiling of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates: A Multicentric Retrospective Indian Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2021, 73, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shukla, S.; Desai, S.; Bagchi, A.; Singh, P.; Joshi, M.; Joshi, C.; Patankar, J.; Maheshwari, G.; Rajni, E.; Shah, M.; et al. Diversity and Distribution of β-Lactamase Genes Circulating in Indian Isolates of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shankar, C.; Vasudevan, K.; Jacob, J.J.; Baker, S.; Isaac, B.J.; Neeravi, A.R.; Sethuvel, D.P.M.; George, B.; Veeraraghavan, B. Hybrid Plasmids Encoding Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Traits Among Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae ST2096 in India. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 875116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sundaresan, A.K.; Vincent, K.; Mohan, G.B.M.; Ramakrishnan, J. Association of sequence types, antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Indian isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae: A comparative genomics study. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 30, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mancini, S.; Poirel, L.; Tritten, M.L.; Lienhard, R.; Bassi, C.; Nordmann, P. Emergence of an MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae ST231 producing OXA-232 and RmtF in Switzerland. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 821–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Di Pilato, V.; Henrici De Angelis, L.; Aiezza, N.; Baccani, I.; Niccolai, C.; Parisio, E.M.; Giordano, C.; Camarlinghi, G.; Barnini, S.; Forni, S.; et al. Resistome and virulome accretion in an NDM-1-producing ST147 sublineage of Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with an outbreak in Tuscany, Italy: A genotypic and phenotypic characterisation. Lancet Microbe 2022, 3, e224–e234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abid, F.B.; Tsui, C.K.M.; Doi, Y.; Deshmukh, A.; McElheny, C.L.; Bachman, W.C.; Fowler, E.L.; Albishawi, A.; Mushtaq, K.; Ibrahim, E.B.; et al. Molecular characterization of clinical carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales from Qatar. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Jin, J.; Li, G.; Shao, H.; Song, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, J.; Li, L. Genomic Epidemiology and Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in ICU Inpatients in Henan Province, China: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0419722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mathers, A.J.; Crook, D.; Vaughan, A.; Barry, K.E.; Vegesana, K.; Stoesser, N.; Parikh, H.I.; Sebra, R.; Kotay, S.; Walker, A.S.; et al. Klebsiella quasipneumoniae Provides a Window into Carbapenemase Gene Transfer, Plasmid Rearrangements, and Patient Interactions with the Hospital Environment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e02513-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Venkitapathi, S.; Wijesundara, Y.H.; Cornelius, S.A.; Herbert, F.C.; Gassensmith, J.J.; Zimmern, P.E.; De Nisco, N.J. Conserved FimK Truncation Coincides with Increased Expression of Type 3 Fimbriae and Cultured Bladder Epithelial Cell Association in Klebsiella quasipneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 2022, 204, e0017222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shen, X.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Ai, W.; Cao, X.; Zhan, Q.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, F. High Prevalence of 16S rRNA Methyltransferase Genes in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates Associated with Bloodstream Infections in 11 Chinese Teaching Hospitals. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 2189–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saadatian Farivar, A.; Nowroozi, J.; Eslami, G.; Sabokbar, A. RAPD PCR Profile, Antibiotic Resistance, Prevalence of armA Gene, and Detection of KPC Enzyme in Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 2018, 6183162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Al Sheikh, Y.A.; Marie, M.A.M.; John, J.; Krishnappa, L.G.; Dabwab, K.H.M. Prevalence of 16S rRNA methylase genes among β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates in Saudi Arabia. Libyan J. Med. 2014, 9, 24432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dey, S.; Gaur, M.; Sahoo, R.K.; Das, A.; Jain, B.; Pati, S.; Subudhi, E. Genomic characterization of XDR Klebsiella pneumoniae ST147 co-resistant to carbapenem and colistin—The first report in India. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 22, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cerón, S.; Salem-Bango, Z.; Contreras, D.A.; Ranson, E.L.; Yang, S. Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with Concurrent Production of NDM and OXA-48-like Carbapenemases in Southern California, 2016–2022. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Boonyasiri, A.; Jauneikaite, E.; Brinkac, L.M.; Greco, C.; Lerdlamyong, K.; Tangkoskul, T.; Nguyen, K.; Thamlikitkul, V.; Fouts, D.E. Genomic and clinical characterisation of multidrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing ST231 and ST16 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates colonising patients at Siriraj hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from 2015 to 2017. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Piccirilli, A.; Cherubini, S.; Azzini, A.M.; Tacconelli, E.; Lo Cascio, G.; Maccacaro, L.; Bazaj, A.; Naso, L.; Amicosante, G.; Ltcf-Veneto Working Group; et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) of Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae Isolated in Long-Term Care Facilities in the Northern Italian Region. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zeng, Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, M.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Shi, L.; Yang, X.; Xia, H.; Yang, S.; Yang, L. The association between ambient temperature and antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae in China: A difference-in-differences analysis. Front. Public. Health 2023, 11, 1158762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Paskova, V.; Medvecky, M.; Skalova, A.; Chudejova, K.; Bitar, I.; Jakubu, V.; Bergerova, T.; Zemlickova, H.; Papagiannitsis, C.C.; Hrabak, J. Characterization of NDM-Encoding Plasmids from Enterobacteriaceae Recovered from Czech Hospitals. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shen, S.; Han, R.; Yin, D.; Jiang, B.; Ding, L.; Guo, Y.; Wu, S.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Hu, F. A Nationwide Genomic Study of Clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae Carrying blaOXA-232 and rmtF in China. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e03863-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Spadar, A.; Phelan, J.; Elias, R.; Modesto, A.; Caneiras, C.; Marques, C.; Lito, L.; Pinto, M.; Cavaco-Silva, P.; Ferreira, H.; et al. Genomic epidemiological analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae from Portuguese hospitals reveals insights into circulating antimicrobial resistance. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A(i)) ESBL Double-disk synergy test, (A(ii)) disk approximation test, and (A(iii)) D69C AmpC detection set for AmpC detection; (B(i)) modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and (B(ii)) Combo test kit for carbapenemase detection; (A(i)). Synergistic activity between the substrates and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is indicated by black arrows. (A(ii)) Strong and weak induction (red arrows) towards the ceftazidime (CAZ) as substrate and imipenem (IPM), cefoxitin (FOX), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) as inducers. The potentiation between drugs is indicated by yellow arrows. (A(iii)) D69C AmpC detection set. (a) AmpC positive. (b,c) AmpC negative (exhibiting other type(s) of resistance). Disk A (cefpodoxime 10 μg + AmpC inducer), disk B (cefpodoxime 10 μg + AmpC inducer + ESBL inhibitor), and disk C (cefpodoxime 10 μg + AmpC inducer + ESBL inhibitor + AmpC inhibitors). Modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) (B(i)), identification of carbapenemase-producing strains via mCIM test. The control strain E. coli ATCC 25922 was carbapenemase negative, having a zone size of >19 mm. Two target isolates carried carbapenemase, which broke down the 10 μg meropenem after incubation for 4 h ± 15 min at 35 °C. Combo test kit for carbapenemase detection (B(ii)), from left to right—carbapenemase not detected (C = control), OXA-48 detected (O = OAX-48), NDM detected (N = NDM), and KPC detected (K = KPC) (V = VIM) (I = IMP).
Figure 1. (A(i)) ESBL Double-disk synergy test, (A(ii)) disk approximation test, and (A(iii)) D69C AmpC detection set for AmpC detection; (B(i)) modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and (B(ii)) Combo test kit for carbapenemase detection; (A(i)). Synergistic activity between the substrates and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is indicated by black arrows. (A(ii)) Strong and weak induction (red arrows) towards the ceftazidime (CAZ) as substrate and imipenem (IPM), cefoxitin (FOX), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) as inducers. The potentiation between drugs is indicated by yellow arrows. (A(iii)) D69C AmpC detection set. (a) AmpC positive. (b,c) AmpC negative (exhibiting other type(s) of resistance). Disk A (cefpodoxime 10 μg + AmpC inducer), disk B (cefpodoxime 10 μg + AmpC inducer + ESBL inhibitor), and disk C (cefpodoxime 10 μg + AmpC inducer + ESBL inhibitor + AmpC inhibitors). Modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) (B(i)), identification of carbapenemase-producing strains via mCIM test. The control strain E. coli ATCC 25922 was carbapenemase negative, having a zone size of >19 mm. Two target isolates carried carbapenemase, which broke down the 10 μg meropenem after incubation for 4 h ± 15 min at 35 °C. Combo test kit for carbapenemase detection (B(ii)), from left to right—carbapenemase not detected (C = control), OXA-48 detected (O = OAX-48), NDM detected (N = NDM), and KPC detected (K = KPC) (V = VIM) (I = IMP).
Diagnostics 15 01062 g001
Table 1. Susceptibility profile of E. coli and K. pneumoniae from cUTI cases.
Table 1. Susceptibility profile of E. coli and K. pneumoniae from cUTI cases.
AntibioticsE. coliK. pneumoniae
Number of Isolates TestedSusceptibility%Number of Isolates TestedSusceptibility%
Nitrofurantoin40496%15738%
Cotrimoxazole40863%16265%
Fosfomycin330100%13489%
Ampicillin40829%--
Cefazolin25627%9233%
Cefuroxime40251%16155%
Ceftriaxone40754%16161%
Ceftazidime40657%16260%
Cefepime40756%16363%
Amoxicillin-clavulanate15266%7765%
Ampicillin-sulbactam24965%10352%
Piperacillin-tazobactam40895%16372%
Gentamicin40887%16380%
Amikacin40798%16380%
Ciprofloxacin34744%13347%
Levofloxacin35746%13648%
Ertapenem37198%14681%
Imipenem40898%16383%
Meropenem40699%16384%
Minocycline27087%9861%
Table 2. Prevalence of ESBL, AmpC, and CRE among E. coli and K. pneumoniae in cUTI.
Table 2. Prevalence of ESBL, AmpC, and CRE among E. coli and K. pneumoniae in cUTI.
PhenotypeE. coli,
n (%)
K. pneumoniae,
n (%)
Total Prevalence Among E. coli (n = 406) and
K. pneumoniae (n = 163)
ESBL164 (40.4%)33 (20.2%)197 (34.6%)
AmpC10 (2.5%)6 (3.7%)16 (2.8%)
ESBL + AmpC14 (3.4%)1 (0.6%)15 (2.6%)
CRE7 (1.7%)28 (17.2%)35 (6.2%)
Total19568263
Table 3. Heat map of antibiotic resistance genes detected within the FOX-resistant E. coli using ResFinder. The figure shows the distribution of antibiotic resistance genes to each antibiotic class. The colored boxes to the right of each strain demonstrate the distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes as follows: aminoglycoside (green), macrolide (light blue), quinolone (peach), folate pathway antagonist (dark gray), tetracycline (dark pink), and beta-lactam (yellow). White boxes indicate absence of these genes.
Table 3. Heat map of antibiotic resistance genes detected within the FOX-resistant E. coli using ResFinder. The figure shows the distribution of antibiotic resistance genes to each antibiotic class. The colored boxes to the right of each strain demonstrate the distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes as follows: aminoglycoside (green), macrolide (light blue), quinolone (peach), folate pathway antagonist (dark gray), tetracycline (dark pink), and beta-lactam (yellow). White boxes indicate absence of these genes.
IsolateAminoglycosideMacrolideQuinoloneFolate Pathway AntagonistTetracyclineBeta-Lactam
AmpCESBLblaOXAblaTEM
aac(3)-IIa aadA5aph(3″)-Ib aph(6)-Id mph(A) aac(6′)-Ib-cr qnrB4 qnrS1 dfrA7 dfrA14 dfrA17 sul1 sul2 tet(A) Tet(B) blaDHA-1 blaCTX-M-15 blaOXA-1 blaTEM-1B blaTEM-35
0410
7659
7826
8268
0495
0539
0402
2536
8100
9044
4976
Table 4. Heat map of antibiotic resistance genes detected within the CRE K. pneumoniae using ResFinder. The figure shows the distribution of antibiotic resistance genes to each antibiotic class. The colored boxes to the right of each strain demonstrate the distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes as follows: aminoglycoside (green), quinolone (peach), folate pathway antagonist (dark gray), tetracycline (dark pink), beta-lactam (yellow), and fosfomycin (gold). White boxes indicate the absence of the genes.
Table 4. Heat map of antibiotic resistance genes detected within the CRE K. pneumoniae using ResFinder. The figure shows the distribution of antibiotic resistance genes to each antibiotic class. The colored boxes to the right of each strain demonstrate the distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes as follows: aminoglycoside (green), quinolone (peach), folate pathway antagonist (dark gray), tetracycline (dark pink), beta-lactam (yellow), and fosfomycin (gold). White boxes indicate the absence of the genes.
IsolateMLSTAminoglycosideQuinoloneFolate Pathway AntagonistTetracyclineBeta-LactamFosfomycin
aac(6′)-IbaadA1aadA2aph(3′)-Iaaph(3′)-VIarmArmtFaac(6′)-Ib-crqnrAqnrBqnrSOqxAOqxBdfrA1dfrA5dfrA12dfrA14sul1sul2tet(A)tet(D)blaSHV-28blaSHV-106blaSHV-40blaSHV-56blaSHV-89blaSHV-11blaSHV-67blaTEM-1blaCTX-M-8blaCTX-M-15blaDHA-1blaOXA-1blaOXA-9blaOXA-48blaOXA-232blaNDM-5blaKPC-2blaOKP-B-3fosA5fosA6
4494ST-2096
1395ST-2096
4590ST-2096
9002ST-2096
4787ST-2096
5038ST-2096
0821ST-2096
2541ST-2096
2542ST-2096
9590ST-2096
8474ST-2096
8637ST-2096
1502ST-231
0403ST-147
2967ST-147
0350ST-147
4279ST-147
6112ST-147
7117ST-147
0845ST-147
2579ST-1770
1776ST-111
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

AL Shizawi, N.; AL Jabri, Z.; Khan, F.; Sami, H.; AL Siyabi, T.; AL Muharrmi, Z.; Sirasanagandla, S.R.; Rizvi, M. Mapping Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Oman: Phenotypic and Genotypic Insights. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091062

AMA Style

AL Shizawi N, AL Jabri Z, Khan F, Sami H, AL Siyabi T, AL Muharrmi Z, Sirasanagandla SR, Rizvi M. Mapping Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Oman: Phenotypic and Genotypic Insights. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(9):1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091062

Chicago/Turabian Style

AL Shizawi, Nawal, Zaaima AL Jabri, Fatima Khan, Hiba Sami, Turkiya AL Siyabi, Zakariya AL Muharrmi, Srinivasa Rao Sirasanagandla, and Meher Rizvi. 2025. "Mapping Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Oman: Phenotypic and Genotypic Insights" Diagnostics 15, no. 9: 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091062

APA Style

AL Shizawi, N., AL Jabri, Z., Khan, F., Sami, H., AL Siyabi, T., AL Muharrmi, Z., Sirasanagandla, S. R., & Rizvi, M. (2025). Mapping Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Oman: Phenotypic and Genotypic Insights. Diagnostics, 15(9), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop