Next Article in Journal
Halloysite Reinforced Natural Esters for Energy Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanism and Experimental Study on Electrostatic Atomization Using Needle-Shaped Electrodes
Previous Article in Journal
Measurement for Lubricant Distribution in an Angular Contact Ball Bearing and Its Influence Investigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Frictional Characteristics of Bio-Based Lubricants Obtained from Fatty Acids of Castor Oil
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

State-of-the-Art in Sustainable Machining of Different Materials Using Nano Minimum Quality Lubrication (NMQL)

Lubricants 2023, 11(2), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants11020064
by Avinash Kumar 1, Anuj Kumar Sharma 2 and Jitendra Kumar Katiyar 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Lubricants 2023, 11(2), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants11020064
Submission received: 30 December 2022 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 3 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biolubricants in Machining)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Previous acceptation, authors must be work in some points. Please see the file attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

The article titled "State of Art on Sustainable Machining of Different Materials using Nano Minimum Quality Lubrication (NMQL)" can publish in the Journal. However, a radical revision is required for this manuscript. After the major revision, it must be peer-reviewed again.

The article is acceptable after the incorporation of the following significant suggestions:

1- The abstract and introduction need to be reorganized.

2- The nomenclature section can be added before the introduction section to understand the manuscript.

3- The paper's purpose should be presented more strikingly in the introduction section.

4- The whole manuscript was edited according to proofreading typos, such as subscripts and superscripts.

5- A chapter on using surfactants in nanofluid mixtures can be opened. In particular, the table can also give information on the type and use of surfactant.

6- If Table 1 and Table 2 were given horizontally on a separate page, it would be more convenient for the reader.

7- Instead of Figure 2, a different figure describing the mechanisms should be preferred. This is because this figure does not fully express all the nanoparticle mechanisms. In addition, if all nanoparticle mechanisms are added to new figures, the manuscript will be more understandable.

8- The whole manuscript must be checked in terms of English. It should be more understandable for the readers.

9- Please readdressed the conclusion for readers.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

my comments were taken into account. Accepted.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors addresed reviewer comments, now paper can be publish in the journal.

 

Back to TopTop