Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
The First Study of Mating Mistakes in Stoneflies (Plecoptera) from China, with Remarks on Their Biological Implications
Previous Article in Journal
Leaf Nutritional Content, Tree Richness, and Season Shape the Caterpillar Functional Trait Composition Hosted by Trees
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Synonym and New Species Record of Filchneria (Plecoptera: Perlodidae) from China with a Morphological, Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Study on This Genus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/insects13121101
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Mitogenome Features of Philopotamidae (Insecta: Trichoptera) with Two New Species of Gunungiella

by
Lang Peng
1,†,‡,
Xinyu Ge
1,†,‡,
Faxian Shi
1,
Le Wang
2,
Haoming Zang
1,
Changhai Sun
1,* and
Beixin Wang
1,*
1
Laboratory of Insect Taxonomy & Aquatic Insects, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, Nanjing 210042, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
Zoobank link: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E50A14F5-EE27-48F0-A56D-C6403684094C.
Insects 2022, 13(12), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121101
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 25 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Themed Issue in Honor of Prof. Dr. Xin-Hua Wang on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday: Diversity, Ecology and Evolution of Aquatic Insects)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The cosmopolitan family of Philopotamidae Stephens 1829 currently includes 26 genera and more than 1500 extant species, and is represented by three subfamilies, Paulianodinae, Chimarrinae and Philopotaminae. In past studies, the genus Gunungiella Ulmer 1913 has been subordinate to the subfamily Philopotaminae. The new species in this study provided additional distribution data to the genus and also provided mitogenome data support for evolutionary lineage studies.

Abstract

A total of 14 individuals of Philopotamidae, from China, were examined. Six species in four genera, including two new species of the genus Gunungiella, were recognized. Their COI barcode sequences were extracted, mitogenomes were sequenced, assembled and analyzed. All of these sequences were used to further reveal the phylogenetic relationships of the family Philopotamidae. In addition, two new species: Gunungiella wangi n. sp., Gunungiella flabellata n. sp. were described and illustrated.

1. Introduction

The Philopotamidae is a caddis family with approximately 1500 species in 26 genera distributed on all continents except Antarctica [1]. Palpi of adults are of considerable length; the maxillary palpi are with a fifth segment forming a flexible flagellum, the second segment is twice the length of the first, and the fourth segment is half the length of the fifth; the ocelli are present; spur formula is 2-4-4 or 1-4-4. Venations are complete, usually with all forks present: I, II, III, IV, and V in the front wings and I, II, III, and V in the hind wings. In the front wings, the thyridial cell is very long, discoidal and the median cells are always closed. In the hind wings, Sc ends at R1, and the discoidal and median cells are open or closed [2].
The genus Gunungiella Ulmer, 1913 [3] is a peculiar genus of the family Philopotamidae (Trichoptera). A review of this genus was given by Schmid [2]; subsequently, a number of new species were described by other researchers. The last reported species of Gunungiella was in 2011 [4,5]. Currently, the genus Gunungiella includes eighty-four species [1], all of which are distributed in the Oriental region. Among them, thirty-four from India by Schmid [2,6]; nine from Malaysia by Huisman, Malicky, Melnitsky and Ivanov [7,8,9]; nine from Thailand by Malicky, Chantaramongkol and Prommi [5,10,11,12,13,14]; eight from Philippe by Ulmer, Banks, Malicky and Mey [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]; eight from Indonesia by Ulmer, Malicky, Melnitsky, Ivanov and Oláh [3,4,9,11,22,23]; eight from Vietnam by Malicky and Oláh [13,24,25]; four from China, before this study, by Schmid, Sun and Gui [2,26,27]; three from Sri Lanka by Bank, Schmid, Chantaramongkol and Malicky [28,29,30]; one from Pakistan by Schmid [31].
The genus Gunungiella has been considered to belong to the subfamily Philopotaminae as a highly differentiated lineage, derived from the genus Wormaldia by Schmid in 1968. The genitalia of this genus varied greatly among species, so it is impossible to deduce the evolution and phylogeny of the species [2]. In addition, no new Gunungiella species have been reported or described in the last decade. It proves difficult to get specimens of the genus, which makes the availability of high-quality DNA-grade specimens even rarer. To date, only eight small molecular fragments from six species have been published in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 11 July 2022), which limits our understanding of the phylogenetic position of Gunungiella using multi-marker DNA. Meanwhile, lacking molecular markers hinders the application of environmental DNA metabarcoding technology in water quality monitoring [32,33].
Mitochondria are organelles involved in energy metabolism in eukaryotic cells [34,35]. The mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) has the characteristics of maternal inheritance, low sequence recombination, and fast evolutionary rates [36,37]. Generally, the mitogenome contains 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), two ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs), and one control region (CR) [38]. As mitogenomes are considered effective markers for revealing phylogenetic relationships and evolution in many insect groups [39,40,41,42], with the popularization of high-throughput sequencing technology, the mitogenome of Trichopteran has gradually increased. Ge et al. [43] sequenced mitogenomes of four genera of Philopotamidae (Chimarra Stephens, 1829; Wormaldia McLachlan, 1865; Kisaura Ross, 1956; Dolophilodes Ulmer, 1909) for the first time and they found a trnQ-trnI-trnM rearrangement pattern in these four genera. However, the mitogenome of the genus Gunungiella has not been published, and its genomic structure, nucleotide composition, and substitutional and evolutionary rates are still unknown.
In this study, 14 philopotamids from China were examined, and six species in four genera were identified. Among them, two new species were recognized, described, and illustrated. Meanwhile, we obtained new complete mitogenomes of these six species by high-throughput sequencing, among which those of the genus Gunungiella are published for the first time. Then we analyzed the genomic structure, base composition, and evolutionary rates of the new mitogenome, expanding our understanding of the mitogenomes of Philopotamidae. In addition, combined with the published mitochondrial genome of the Philopotamidae, Hydropsychidae and Stenopsychidae, we performed a phylogenomic analysis of the Philopotamidae to explore the phylogenetic position of Gunungiella.

2. Materials and Methods

A total of 14 philopotamid adults were collected during 2017–2021 with light traps [44] and Malaise traps [45]. Then they were identified to species. Out of six species, two are new to science in Table 1.

2.1. Morphological Study

All specimens were stored in 95% ethyl alcohol immediately after collection. The methods used for preparation of specimens followed Xu et al. [44]. Male abdomens used for illustrations were cleared with 10% NaOH solution and heated to 90 °C for 10 min to remove all the non-chitinous tissues. Then the cleaned genitalia were rinsed in distilled water and mounted on a depression slide with lactic acid for examination. Genitalia structure of males were traced with a pencil using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope equipped with a camera lucida. Pencil drawings were scanned with an Epson Perfection V30 SE scanner, then placed as templates in Adobe Photoshop v.8.1 software and inked digitally with a Wacom CTL-671 tablet to produce final illustrations. Then each abdomen was stored in a microvial together with the remainder of the specimen in 95% ethanol.
The terminology for wing venation follows Ross [46] and male genitalia follows Schmid [2], as indicated in figures and text.
All types are deposited in the Insect Collection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China (NJAU).

2.2. DNA Extraction, Amplification and Sequencing

All philopotamid samples for DNA extraction were preserved in 100% ethanol and stored at −20 °C. The DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (QIAGEN) was used to extract the genomic DNA from the legs of each sample according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA of the sample was deposited at the College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China. The mtCOI barcoding (685bp) PCR amplification, sequencing, and analysis followed the procedures of Zang et al. [47]. The sequencing libraries were generated for a single sample with an insert size of 350 bp using the genomic DNA at Berry Genomics (Beijing, China). Each sequencing library performed paired-end 150 bp sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform and then approximately 4–6 Gb clean data were produced for subsequent analysis.

2.3. Assembly, Annotation and Nucleotide Composition

NOVOPlasty v3.8.3 [48] was used to de novo assemble the mitogenomes. COI barcoding was used as a seed sequence and assembly with k-mer sizes of 39 bp. We predicted tRNAs using a MITOS2 [49] web server with the parameter “invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code”. Geneious 2020.2.1. [50] was used to predict PCGs using Clustal Omega by aligning with the published philopotamid mitogenome. Newly sequenced mitogenomes were submitted to GenBank. SeqKit v0.16.0 [51] was used to calculate the nucleotide composition and base composition of novel mitogenomes. We used DnaSP 6.0 [52] to calculate the rates of the non-synonymous substitution rate (Ka)/synonymous substitution rate (Ks) for each PCG, and the CG View server V 1.0 [53] was used to generate the mitogenome maps. Mitogenome sequences were uploaded to the NCBI database. The accession numbers are shown in Table 2.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

To explore the phylogenetic position of the genus Gunungiella within Philopotamidae, 26 mitogenomes of Trichoptera were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic tree. We select published 13 hydropsychid and 3 stenopsychid mitogenome as an outgroup, according to the phylogeny of Annulipalpia (Table S1) [54]. MAFFT version 7.470 [55] was used to align the nucleotide and amino acids of 13 PCGs and two rRNAs genes with the parameter “L-INS-I”. Subsequently, the trimal v1.4.1 [56] was used to remove unreliable homologous regions with “-automated1” method. Finally, FASconCAT-G v1.04 [57] was used to generate five matrixes using the alignments: (1) the PCGFAA (containing amino acid sequences of 13 PCGs); (2) the PCG (containing nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs). (3) the PCG12 (containing 1st and 2nd codon positions of nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs); (4) the PCGR (containing nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs and two rRNA nucleotide sequences); (5) the PCG12R (containing 1st and 2nd codon positions of nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs and two rRNA nucleotide sequences). We used partitioned maximum likelihood (ML) models and the site-heterogeneous mixture model (CAT+GTR) to infer the phylogenetic relationship of Philopotamidae. For ML analyses, MODELFINDER [58] in IQ-TREE v2.0.7 [59] was used to calculate the best substitution models for each gene. The phylogenetic inference was produced using IQ-TREE with the parameter “-msub mitochondrial -B 1000 [60] --alrt 1000” [61]. To address the heterogeneous effect, the posterior mean site frequency model [62] was used for PCGFAA matrix. For the site-heterogeneous mixture model analyses, we built the phylogenetic tree using Phylobayes-MPI v1.8 [63]. Two independent Markov chain Monte Carlo chains (MCMC) were performed and stopped after the two runs had converged (maxdiff < 0.3). A consensus tree was calculated from the remaining trees combined after the initial 25% trees (burn-in tree) of each chain were discarded [64].

3. Results

3.1. Taxonomy

3.1.1. Gunungiella wangi, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp. (Figure 1a and Figure 2a–e)

Description: Specimens in alcohol with compound eyes black, mesothorax and legs yellowish brown, abdomen dark brown dorsally, pale yellow ventrally. Fore- and hindwings uniformly brown. Forewings each 4.3 mm long (n = 1). Venations typical of genus. Forewings each with fork I, II and V present and sessile; with crossvein between Sc and R1, inverted “L”-shaped hyaline stripe across anastomosis, and irregular hyaline area across m-cu and base of M3+4. Hindwings with fork II and V present, first one petiolate; tip of Sc translucent; with crossvein between Sc and R1, and hyaline area across middle part of M; vein A1 and A2 with base healed, A1+2, A2 and A3 connected to form ring (Figure 1a).
Insects 13 01101 g001 550
Figure 1. Wing venations of two new species of genus Gunungiella: (a) Gunungiella wangi, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp.; (b) Gunungiella flabellate, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp. Abbreviations: Sc = Subcosta; R = Radius; M = Media; Cu = Cunitus; A = Anal. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 1. Wing venations of two new species of genus Gunungiella: (a) Gunungiella wangi, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp.; (b) Gunungiella flabellate, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp. Abbreviations: Sc = Subcosta; R = Radius; M = Media; Cu = Cunitus; A = Anal. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Insects 13 01101 g001
Male genitalia: Segment VIII with tergum fused with sternite; trilobate in dorsal view, middle lobe nearly elongate-oval, paired lateral ones each three times the length of the middle one (Figure 2a); nearly square in ventral view (Figure 2b); in lateral view, middle and paired lobes each tapering to apex, lower half of segment VIII nearly rectangular, lateral margins each with upper portions produced into blunt process (Figure 2c). Segment IX deeply invaginated within segment VIII, in dorsal view with upper portion having anterior margin deeply incised in U-shape, and lower portion with posterior margin having shallow incision; in lateral view with anterodorsal portion elongate-triangular, and lower portion rectangular. Segment X narrow and consists of dorsal and ventral branches (Figure 2a); dorsal branch deeply indented at its extremity, producing into two lobes, each lobe with strong spine at apex; ventral branch slightly longer and wider than dorsal one, slightly indented and curved upwards at its extremity (Figure 2a,c). A membranous structure connected segment IX and inferior appendages. First articles constantly fused with each other at base in ventral view (Figure 2b), in lateral view subrectangular, each with dorsal margin arched upwards, articulated with segment IX by anterodorsal (Figure 2c). Second articles smaller than first articles, club-shaped in lateral view and nephroid in ventral view; each with row of strong spines at outer lower base (Figure 2c). Phallus slender and sclerotized, hidden underneath segment X (Figure 2c); consists of basally inflated phallotheca and tubular endotheca with four strong spines in the middle. Diagnosis: The new species somewhat resembles G. saptadachi Schmid, 1968 from China in the segment X consisting of two layers, but they still can be distinguished from each other in that: (1) tergum VIII and sternite VIII are fused completely in the new species, but separated in G. saptadachi; (2) the paired lateral lobes of segment VIII are long, extending significantly beyond the middle lobe, almost reaching to the distal end of segment X in dorsal view; (3) segment IX slender, with anterior margin extending beyond segment VIII anteriorly in lateral view; and (4) in dorsal view the dorsal branch of segment X with the apex deeply indented; the ventral branch of segment X elongate-triangular, with the apex shallowly incised.
Insects 13 01101 g002 550
Figure 2. Male genitalia of Gunungiella wangi, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp.: (a) dorsal; (b) ventral; (c) left lateral. Abbreviations: seg. VIII = segment VIII; seg. IX = segment IX; seg. X = segment X; 1 = first article (paired); 2 = second article (paired); pha. = phallus. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.
Figure 2. Male genitalia of Gunungiella wangi, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp.: (a) dorsal; (b) ventral; (c) left lateral. Abbreviations: seg. VIII = segment VIII; seg. IX = segment IX; seg. X = segment X; 1 = first article (paired); 2 = second article (paired); pha. = phallus. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.
Insects 13 01101 g002
Holotype: Male, P.R. China, Hu-nan Province, Shao-yang City, Sui-ning County, Guang-yin-xing, 26.4129° N, 110.0898° E, alt. 550 m, 28 May 2021, collected with light traps, coll. L. Peng (NJAU).
Distribution: China (Hu-nan).
Etymology: This new species is named after Dr Xinhua Wang from Nankai University, Tianjin, P. R. China, in honor of his valuable contributions to the field of aquatic biology and in gratitude for all his strong support for Trichoptera research.

3.1.2. Gunungiella flabellata, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp. (Figure 1b and Figure 3a–e)

Description: Specimens in alcohol with compound eyes black; head, mesothorax and legs yellowish brown, abdomen dark brown dorsally, pale yellow ventrally; fore- and hindwings pure brown. Forewing length 3.7–4.0 mm (n = 5). Forewings each with fork I, II and V present, first two forks sessile; crossvein between Sc and R1, s, r, r-m, m and m-cu present; with two transparent patches, large one just covers anastomosis, but split at base of branches of R2 and R3; small one covers m-cu and base of M1+2 and M3+4. Hindwings each with fork II and V present and petiolate; crossvein between Sc and R1, r-m, m-cu, cu and cu-a present; crossveins r-m, m-cu and base of M translucent and clear; A1 long, each end at hindwing margin; A2 and A3 short, connected by short crossvein ends, each terminates before wing margin. (Figure 1b).
Male genitalia: Tergum and sternite of segment VIII fused in lateral view, with middle portion of each anterior margin produced into small process; in dorsal view, apex produced into three prominent lobes, middle lobe nearly tapering from base to apex, with apex slightly indented; paired lateral ones less than half length of middle one (Figure 3a); somewhat trapezoid in ventral view (Figure 3b). Segment IX deeply invaginated in segment VIII; in lateral view, upper portion extended anteriad into slender triangular process and lower portion nearly pentagonal; in ventral view, anterior margin deeply incised, posterior margin slightly concave mesally at insertion of first article. Segment X consists of dorsal and ventral branches (Figure 3a); in dorsal view dorsal branch slightly indented apically with two chitinous spines, of same length as middle lobe of segment VIII; paired ventral branches slender, longer than dorsal one, in lateral view with apex curved upwards slightly (Figure 3a,c). First article constantly fused with each other basally in ventral view (Figure 3b), subquadrangularin lateral view, each with dorsoanterior angle produced into slender apodeme and with posterior margin slightly concave at insertion of harpago (Figure 3c). Second article vertical, each with base enlarged with row of strong spines (Figure 3c). Phallus extends anteriad beyond segment IX (Figure 3c); phallotheca sclerotized, with base inflated (Figure 3a,e); endotheca tubular, with three strong spines (Figure 3a,c).
Insects 13 01101 g003 550
Figure 3. Male genitalia of Gunungiella flabellata, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp., (a–c) 1 male Holotype specimen, and 7 males from Fu-jian, Da-zhu-lan; (d,e) 1 male from Fu-jian, Lao-wu farm: (a) dorsal; (b) ventral; (c) left lateral; (d) phallus, dorsal; (e) phallus, left lateral. Abbreviations: seg. VIII = segment VIII; seg. IX = segment IX; seg. X = segment X; 1 = first article (paired); 2 = second article (paired); pha. = phallus. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.
Figure 3. Male genitalia of Gunungiella flabellata, Peng, Ge and Sun n. sp., (a–c) 1 male Holotype specimen, and 7 males from Fu-jian, Da-zhu-lan; (d,e) 1 male from Fu-jian, Lao-wu farm: (a) dorsal; (b) ventral; (c) left lateral; (d) phallus, dorsal; (e) phallus, left lateral. Abbreviations: seg. VIII = segment VIII; seg. IX = segment IX; seg. X = segment X; 1 = first article (paired); 2 = second article (paired); pha. = phallus. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.
Insects 13 01101 g003
Diagnosis: The new species resembles G. saptadachi, Schmid, 1968 from China in the shapes of the inferior appendage, but it can be distinguished from the latter by: (1) tergum VIII and sternite VIII healing; (2) the middle lobe of segment VIII nearly oval with extremity slightly indented, its length longer than its width, reach the base of the chitinous teeth of segment X dorsal branch; (3) segment IX slender, with anterior margin far exceeding that of segment VIII in lateral view; and (4) ventral branches of segment X paired, slender and curved upwards at the end. This species is also similar to the new species Gunungiella wangi n. sp., but it can be distinguished from the latter by paired lateral lobes of segment VIII less than half the length of the middle one, but three times the length of the middle lobe in Gunungiella wangi n. sp.
Holotype: Male, P.R. China, Hu-nan Province: Chen-zhou City, Yi-zhang County, Mang-shan Yao Autonomous Township, Mang-shan National Nature Reserve, San-ping waterworks, 24.9818° N, 112.9365° E, alt. 500 m, from 8 to 18 Aug 2020, collected by Malaise trap, coll. X. Lin (NJAU).
Paratypes: 1 male, P.R. China, Fu-jian Province: Wu-yi-shan City, Yang-zhuang Township, Da-an village, Lao-wu farm, 27.8705° N, 117.8636° E, alt. 495 m, 2 July 2021, collected with light trap, coll. C. Sun, X. Ge and L. Peng; 7 males, Wu-yi-shan City, Huang-keng Town, Wu-yi-shan National Park, Da-zhu-lan, 27.6985° N, 117.6521° E, alt. 884 m, 2 to 11 June 2021, collected with Malaise trap, coll. C. Sun, X. Ge and L. Peng (NJAU).
Distribution: China (Hu-nan, Fu-jian).
Etymology: The Latin adjective flabellatus, -a, -um means flabellate referring to the shape of a row of strong spines in the second article in lateral view.
Remarks: Endotheca of seven paratypes from Fu-jian, Da-zhu-lan with three strong spines (Figure 3a,c) as in holotype specimen; endotheca of one paratype from Fu-jian, Lao-wu farm with one tile-like bone and two spines (Figure 3d,e).

3.2. New Mitogenome Features of Philopotamidae

Of complete mitogenomes of the six philopotamid species, Gunungiella flabellata n.sp. has 36 genes, otherwise, each of the other five species has 37 genes. The mitogenome of Chimarra sadayu, Gunungiella flabellata n. sp., Gunungiella acanthoclada, Gunungiella wangi n sp., Kisaura adamickai and Wormaldia spinosa are 16,602, 15,338, 15,657, 15,333, 15,949 and 15,181 bp in size, respectively (Figure 4). Our results show that the six new mitogenomes with a nucleotide composition similar to the typical insects had a high A + T bias, with A + T content ranging from 73.63% (Gunungiella flabellata) to 81.95% (Kisaura adamickai) (Table S2). The highest A + T content was found in the CR, while the lowest was present in PCGs. The A + T content of the genus Gunungiella was significantly higher than that of other genera in Philopotamidae (Wilcoxon rank sum test; p < 0.05). Most genes (9 PCGs and 14 (13) tRNAs) were encoded on the majority strand (J strand), while the other 14 genes were encoded on the minority strand (N strand). The new mitogenomes of five philopotamids showed positive AT-skew, but that of Kisaura adamickai showed negative AT-skew. Meanwhile, the positive GC-skew was also found in all six mitogenomes.

3.2.1. Protein Coding Genes

There was no significant difference in the length of PCGs of the new mitogenomes. COX3, ATP6, CYTB, ND4 and ND4L only had a kind of start codon (ATG); other protein-coding genes had two or three kinds of start codons (Figure S1). All start codons are of the typical ATN mode. Most PCGs had complete termination codons TAA or TAG, while COX2, COX3, ND4, ND5 and ND1 of some species have a termination codon TA or T. The A + T content of third codon positions was significantly higher than that of other positions in the PCGs of Philopotamidae. The average ratio of synonymous substitution rate (Ka)/nonsynonymous substitution rate (Ks) (ω) was used to expound the feature of natural selection. The ω values of all PCGs in our study were less than 0.7. Different genes were under different states of purifying pressures, ATP8 displayed relaxed purifying selection (0.64), while COX1 was under the strongest purifying selection, with the lowest ω value (0.11) (Figure 5).

3.2.2. Transfer and Ribosomal RNA Genes

Except for Gunungiella flabellata, that did not have trnS2, the other five new mitogenomes have typical 22 tRNA, ranging in length from 58–73bp. The tRNAs showed high A + T content (83.68–82.78), positive AT-skew and negative GC-skew (Table S2). We also found a mitochondrial gene rearrangement in our sequenced species. The trnI was translocated to the downstream of trnQ, formatting a gene cluster: “trnQ-trnI-trnM”. This rearrangement pattern of tRNA was found in six new mitogenomes. Both rRNAs were encoded on the N-strand of mitogenome and they exhibited similar position and size. The A + T content of s-rRNA was significantly higher than that of l-rRNA (Wilcoxon rank sum test; p < 0.05).

3.2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

We combined the 20 published mitogenome species (four philopotamid species, 13 hydropsychid species and three stenopsychid species) to explore the phylogenetic relationships within Philopotamidae. The results of AliGROOVE analyses showed the high heterogeneity of the third codon (Figure S2), thus, three datasets were used in this study: (1) the PCGFAA matrix contained 3543; (2) the PCG12 matrix contained 7086; (3) the PCG12R matrix contained 9110 sites. The topologies generated by ML and BI methods demonstrate the monophyly of Philopotamidae. However, two methods generated different phylogenetic relationships within Philopotamidae, ML trees displayed the identical topology (Gunungiella + (Chimarra + (Wormaldia + (Kisaura + Dolophilodes))))) (Figure 6a); while the BI method showed two different topologies: the one from PCGFAA datasets was inferred as ((Gunungiella + Chimarra) + (Wormaldia + (Kisaura + Dolophilodes)) and the other from PCG12 and PCG12R datasets was inferred as ((Chimarra + (Wormaldia + Gunungiella)) + (Kisaura + Dolophilodes)) (Figure 6b,c).

4. Discussion

4.1. Mitogenome Features

In this study, we obtained six novel mitogenomes of Philopotamidae, belonging to four genera, of which the genus Gunungiella was reported for the first time. Significant changes in the length of the mitochondrial genome due to differences in control regions were observed. The nucleotide composition of Philopotamidae had a high A + T bias, which is similar to that of Insecta and Trichoptera [65]. The start codons of protein-coding genes are less diverse than those of other families, and TTG and GTG were not found. The COX2, COX3, ND4, ND5 and ND1 of part species appear a termination codon TA or T, which related to post-transcriptional polyadenylation [66,67]. The COXI has the lowest ω value, which is consistent with the results observed from other Trichoptera [54]. The trnQ-trnI-trnM rearrangement pattern was found in all newly sequenced mitogenomes, indicating that this may be a synapomorphy rearrangement of the Philopotamid mitogenome. The mitogenome of Gunungiella flabellata lacks trnS2, which is relatively rare. Generally, tRNAs are the gene category with ‘dispensability’ in the mitogenome; the mitogenomes of some invertebrates do not have the full set of tRNAs [68,69], considering that tRNAs of the cytoplasm were transported to the mitochondria for compensation [70].

4.2. Morphology and Mitogenome Implications for the Phylogenetic Position of Gunungiella

By comparing the illustrations of male genitalia and wing venations of all available species of Gunungiella with those of other philopotamids, we found that the genus Gunungiella shows unique features among its neighbour genera, that is, segment IX is deeply invaginated in segment VIII. In addition, vein M in Gunungiella is two-branched both on the fore- and hindwings, which is different from other Philopotamidae genera, in which M is 3- or 4-branched. According to Ge [41], wings are one of the most important organs of insects, and venation modifications are thought to be the successful adaptation to different environmental conditions.
However, the genus Gunungiella has been considered to belong to the subfamily Philopotaminae since 1968 [2], and as a highly differentiated lineage derived from the genus Wormaldia, based on the morphology. Indeed, the male genitalia shows great similarities between the species of Gunungiella and Wormaldia in the shapes of inferior appendages and phallus. The inferior appendages in both genera are strongly extended; the first articles are well developed, often connected to the segment IX by a short apodeme; each second articles are relatively smaller, hairy or with spurs and inserts at the apex of the first article, and most of them are usually vertical. Phallus in both genera is simple, club-like, rarely curved; endotheca in some species usually have several strong spines; phallotheca is relatively large, with the base inflated. Under these circumstances, it is unworthy to erect a new subfamily for Gunungiella, although the genus Gunungiella has some unique features.
To resolve the dilemma, we performed a phylogenetic analysis on mitogenomes. Our results showed that the monophyly of Philopotamidae was recovered in all trees, but the monophyly of the subfamilies was not supported. In the ML tree, Gunungiella is inferred as a monophyletic sister group to other philopotamid species, which is similar to the results of the TNT tree by Wahlberg et al. [71]. However, we obtained an unstable topology when using the site-heterogeneous mix model (CAT+GTR); in this situation, the genus Gunungiella forms a sister group to Wormaldia. Due to incomplete taxon sampling, we cannot fully understand the relationship between each genus. The changes in the phylogenetic position of the genus Gunungiella may be a result of long branch attraction [72].

5. Conclusions

Both morphological and molecular analyses do not support erecting a new subfamily to accommodate the genus Gunungiella. We conservatively treat it as a genus of Philopotaminae. To conclude, the mitogenome data presented in this paper were unable to resolve the deep nodes in the Philopotamidae, so more data are needed to draw firmer conclusions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects13121101/s1. Table S1: Detailed taxonomic resources used in present study. Table S2: Nucleotide composition of mitogenomes of six philopotamid species. Table S3: PCR primers used to sequence mtCOI genes of Trichoptera in this study. Table S4: The best model for each partition of the three Matrixs. Figure S1: Start codons of PCGs among Trichoptera mitogenomes. Figure S2: Heterogeneity of sequence composition for different datasets. The pairwise Aliscore values are represented by colored. The scores range from −1 showing full random similarity (dark blue), to +1 showing non-random similarity (shiny red): (a) PCGFAA; (b) PCG12R; (c) PCG12; (d) PCGs_site3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors; methodology, all authors; software, L.P. and X.G.; validation, L.P., X.G. and H.Z.; formal analysis, L.P., X.G., F.S. and H.Z.; investigation, L.P., F.S., L.W., H.Z. and C.S.; resources, all authors; data curation, L.P. and X.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.P. and X.G.; writing—review and editing, C.S.; visualization, L.P. and X.G.; supervision, C.S. and B.W.; project administration, B.W.; funding acquisition, L.W., C.S. and B.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 41771052) and the GDAS’ Special Project of Science and Technology Development (No. 2020GDASYL-20200102021).

Data Availability Statement

The voucher specimens from this research were deposited in the Insect Classification and Aquatic Insect Laboratory, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China. The new mitogenomes are deposited in GenBank of NCBI under accession numbers OP351513- OP351518. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature). The LSID (Life Science Identifier) for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E50A14F5-EE27-48F0-A56D-C6403684094C.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Xiao-long Lin from Shanghai Ocean University and Hai-jun Yu, for providing us with specimens. We sincerely thank the project of Biological Resources Survey in Wuyishan National Park for organizing the investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Morse, J.C. Trichoptera World Checklist. Available online: http://entweb.clemson.edu/database/trichopt/index.htm (accessed on 21 June 2022).
  2. Schmid, F. Le genre Gunungiella Ulmer (Trichoptères: Philopotamides). Can. Entomol. 1968, 100, 897–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ulmer, G. Über einige von Edw. Jacobson auf Java gesammelte Trichopteren. Notes Leyden Mus. 1913, 35, 78–101. [Google Scholar]
  4. Oláh, J.; Malicky, H. Caddisflies (Trichoptera) from Sumatra (Indonesia), with descriptions of eleven new species. Braueria 2011, 38, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  5. Malicky, H. Neue Trichopteren aus Europa und Asien. Braueria 2011, 38, 23–43. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmid, F. Les Trichoptères de la collection Navas. Eos Rev. Española De Entomol. 1949, 25, 305–426. [Google Scholar]
  7. Huisman, J. New species of Gunungiella (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae) from Sabah, East Malaysia. Zool. Meded. 1993, 67, 75–89. [Google Scholar]
  8. Malicky, H. Weitere neue Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera) aus Asien. Braueria 1995, 22, 11–26. [Google Scholar]
  9. Melnitsky, S.I.; Ivanov, V.D. New species of the family Philopotamidae (Insecta: Trichoptera) from Malaysia and Indonesia. Proc. Zool. Inst. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2010, 314, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malicky, H.; Chantaramongkol, P. Neue Trichopteren aus Thailand. Teil 1: Rhyacophilidae, Hydrobiosidae, Philopotamidae, Polycentropodidae, Ecnomidae, Psychomyidae, Arctopsychidae, Hydropsychidae. Linz. Biol. Beiträge 1993, 25, 433–487. [Google Scholar]
  11. Malicky, H.; Chantaramongkol, P. Neue Trichopteren aus Thailand. Teil 2: Rhyacophilidae, Philopotamidae, Polycentropodidae, Ecnomidae, Psychomyiidae, Xiphocentronidae, Helicopsychidae, Odontoceridae. Linz. Biol. Beiträge 1993, 25, 1137–1187. [Google Scholar]
  12. Malicky, H.; Chantaramongkol, P. Vierzehn neue Köcherfliegen aus Thailand (Insecta, Trichoptera). (35. Arbeit über thailändische Köcherfliegen). Linz. Biol. Beiträge 2003, 35, 915–925. [Google Scholar]
  13. Malicky, H. Beiträge zur Kenntnis asiatischer Trichopteren. Braueria 2009, 36, 11–58. [Google Scholar]
  14. Malicky, H.; Prommi, T. Beschreibungen einiger Köcherfliegen aus Süd-Thailand (Trichoptera). Linz. Biol. Beiträge 2006, 38, 1591–1608. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ulmer, G. Trichopteren von den Philippinen und von den Sunda-Inseln. Treubia 1930, 11, 373–497. [Google Scholar]
  16. Banks, N. Neuropteroid insects from the Philippines. Philipp. J. Crop Sci. 1939, 69, 133–145. [Google Scholar]
  17. Malicky, H. Neue asiatische Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae, Philopotamidae, Ecnomidae und Polycentropodidae). Entomol. Ber. Luzern 1993, 29, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mey, W. Contribution to the Knowledge of the caddisflies of the Philippines. 1. (Trichoptera). Dtsch. Entomol. Z. 1995, 42, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mey, W. Contribution to the knowledge of the caddisflies of the Philippines. 2. the species of the Mt. Agtuuganon Range on Mindanao (Insecta: Trichoptera). Nachr. Des Entomol. Ver. Apollo Suppl. 1998, 17, 537–576. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mey, W. Contribution to the knowledge of the caddisfly fauna of the Philippines, III (Insecta: Trichoptera). Entomofauna 1998, 19, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mey, W. Contribution to the knowledge of the caddisfly fauna of the Philippines, V (Insecta, Trichoptera). Insecta Koreana 2003, 20, 425–452. [Google Scholar]
  22. Malicky, H. Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera) von Java und Sumatra, mit Revision einiger Ulmer-Typen aus dem Hamburger Museum. Linz. Biol. Beiträge 1998, 30, 795–814. [Google Scholar]
  23. Malicky, H. Neue Köcherfliegen aus Europa und Asien. Braueria 2004, 31, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  24. Malicky, H. Neue Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera, Insecta) aus Vietnam. Linz. Biol. Beiträge 1995, 27, 851–885. [Google Scholar]
  25. Oláh, J.; Malicky, H. New species and new species records of Trichoptera from Vietnam. Braueria 2010, 37, 13–42. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sun, C.-H.; Gui, F.-R.; Yang, L.-F. Five new species of Philopotamidae (Trichoptera) from Yunnan, China. Kun Chong fen lei xue bao=Entomotaxonomia 2001, 23, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun, C.-h. Two new species of Philopotamidae (Insecta: Trichoptera) from China. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 2007, 30, 71–73. [Google Scholar]
  28. Banks, N. New neuropteroid insects. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. 1920, 64, 299–362. [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmid, F. Trichoptères de Ceylan. Arch. Für Hydrobiol. 1958, 54, 1–173. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chantaramongkol, P.; Malicky, H. Beschreibung von neuen Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera, Insecta) aus Sri Lanka. Ann. Des Nat. Mus. Wien. Ser. B Für Bot. Und Zool. 1984, 88, 511–534. [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmid, F. Trichoptères du Pakistan III. Tijdschr. Voor Entomol. 1960, 103, 83–109. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, G.K.; Chain, F.; Abbott, C.L.; Cristescu, M.E. Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities. Evol. Appl. 2018, 11, 1901–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ge, X.Y.; Zang, H.; Ye, X.; Peng, L.; Wang, B.; Lian, G.; Sun, C. Comparative Mitogenomic Analyses of Hydropsychidae Revealing the Novel Rearrangement of Protein-Coding Gene and tRNA (Trichoptera: Annulipalpia). Insects 2022, 13, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cameron, S.L. Insect mitochondrial genomics: Implications for evolution and phylogeny. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014, 59, 95–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Boore, J.L. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 1767–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Korkmaz, E.M.; Doǧan, Ö.; Durel, B.S.; Temel Altun, B.; Budak, M.; Başibüyük, H.H. Mitogenome organization and evolutionary history of the subfamily Cephinae (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Syst. Entomol. 2022, 43, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zheng, C.-G.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.-M.; Wang, Y.; Bu, W.-J.; Wang, X.-H.; Lin, X.-L. First Report on Mitochondrial Gene Rearrangement in Non-Biting Midges, Revealing a Synapomorphy in Stenochironomus Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae). Insects 2022, 13, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saenz Manchola, O.F.; Virrueta Herrera, S.; D'Alessio, L.M.; Yoshizawa, K.; García Aldrete, A.N.; Johnson, K.P. Mitochondrial genomes within bark lice (Insecta: Psocodea: Psocomorpha) reveal novel gene rearrangements containing phylogenetic signal. Syst. Entomol. 2021, 46, 938–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yan, L.; Pape, T.; Elgar, M.A.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, D. Evolutionary history of stomach bot flies in the light of mitogenomics. Syst. Entomol. 2019, 44, 797–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lin, X.L.; Liu, Z.; Yan, L.P.; Duan, X.; Bu, W.J.; Wang, X.H.; Zheng, C.G. Mitogenomes provide new insights of evolutionary history of Boreheptagyiini and Diamesini (Diptera: Chironomidae: Diamesinae). Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e8957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.Q.; Li, H.; Song, F.; Zhao, Y.S.; Wilson, J.J.; Cai, W.Z. Higher-level phylogeny and evolutionary history of Pentatomomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) inferred from mitochondrial genome sequences. Syst. Entomol. 2019, 44, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nie, R.; Vogler, A.P.; Yang, X.-K.; Lin, M. Higher-level phylogeny of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomeloidea) inferred from mitochondrial genomes. Syst. Entomol. 2021, 46, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ge, X.Y.; Peng, L.; Vogler, A.P.; Morse, J.C.; Yang, L.F.; Sun, C.H.; Wang, B.X. Massive gene rearrangements of mitochondrial genomes and implications for the phylogeny of Trichoptera (Insecta). Syst. Entomol. 2022, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, J.H. Taxonomy and Larval-Adult Associations of Chinese Stenopsychidae (Insect: Trichoptera). Master of Science Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2014; 101p. [Google Scholar]
  45. Heidinger, R.C. Use of ultraviolet light to increase the availability of aerial insects to caged bluegill sunfish. Progress. Fish-Culturist 1971, 33, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ross, H.H. Evolution and Classification of the Mountain Caddisflies; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1956; 213p. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zang, H.; Ge, X.; Peng, L.; Sun, C.; Wang, B. A New Species of Limnephilus (Insecta: Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) from China, with Revision of the Genus Limnephilus on the Chinese Mainland. Insects 2022, 13, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dierckxsens, N.; Mardulyn, P.; Smits, G. NOVOPlasty: De novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, w955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Donath, A.; Juhling, F.; Al-Arab, M.; Bernhart, S.H.; Reinhardt, F.; Stadler, P.F.; Middendorf, M.; Bernt, M. Improved annotation of protein-coding genes boundaries in metazoan mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 10543–10552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Shen, W.; Le, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, F.Q. SeqKit: A cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e163962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Rozas, J.; Ferrer-Mata, A.; Sanchez-Del; Barrio, J.C.; Guirao-Rico, S.; Librado, P.; Ramos-Onsins, S.E.; Sanchez-Gracia, A. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 3299–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Grant, J.R.; Stothard, P. The CGView Server: A comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (Suppl. 2), W181–W184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Thomas, J.A.; Frandsen, P.B.; Prendini, E.; Zhou, X.; Holzenthal, R.W. A multigene phylogeny and timeline for Trichoptera (Insecta). Syst. Entomol. 2020, 45, 670–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Capella-Gutierrez, S.; Silla-Martinez, J.M.; Gabaldon, T. trimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kück, P.; Longo, G.C. FASconCAT-G: Extensive functions for multiple sequence alignment preparations concerning phylogenetic studies. Front. Zool. 2014, 11, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, H.C.; Minh, B.Q.; Susko, E.; Roger, A.J. Modeling site heterogeneity with posterior mean site frequency profiles accelerates accurate phylogenomic estimation. Syst. Biol. 2017, 67, 216–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Lartillot, N.; Rodrigue, N.; Stubbs, D.; Richer, J. PhyloBayes MPI: Phylogenetic reconstruction with Infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Syst. Biol. 2013, 62, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Rambaut, A. FigTree Version 1.4.3. Computer Program Distributed by the Author. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 25 November 2018).
  65. Ge, X.Y.; Peng, L.; Du, J.; Sun, C.H.; Wang, B.X. New species of the genus Molanna Curtis, 1834 (Trichoptera, Molannidae) in China inferred from morphology and DNA barcodes. ZooKeys 2022, 111, 161–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zheng, C.G.; Zhu, X.X.; Yan, L.P.; Yao, Y.; Lin, X.L. First complete mitogenomes of diamesinae, orthocladiinae, prodiamesinae, tanypodinae (diptera: Chironomidae) and their implication in phylogenetics. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ojala, D.; Montoya, J.; Attardi, G. tRNA punctuation model of RNA processing in human mitochondria. Nature 1981, 290, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zou, H.; Jakovlić, I.; Chen, R.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. The complete mitochondrial genome of parasitic nematode Camallanus cotti: Extreme discontinuity in the rate of mitogenomic architecture evolution within the Chromadorea class. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lavrov, D.V.; Pett, W. Animal Mitochondrial DNA as We Do Not Know It: Mt-Genome Organization and Evolution in Nonbilaterian Lineages. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016, 8, 2896–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Duchêne, A.M.; Pujol, C.; Maréchal-Drouard, L. Import of tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases into mitochondria. Curr. Genet. 2009, 55, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wahlberg, E.; Johanson, K.A. The age, ancestral distribution and radiation of Chimarra (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae) using molecular methods. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2014, 79, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Siddall, M.E.; Whiting, M.F. Long-branch abstractions. Cladistics 1999, 15, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 13 01101 g004 550
Figure 4. The mitogenome of six species of family Philopotamidae: (a) Chimarra sadayu; (b) Kisaura adamickai; (c) Wormaldia spinosa; (d) Gunungiella acanthoclada; (e) Gunungiella flabellata n. sp.; (f) Gunungiella wangi n. sp. The direction of gene transcription is indicated by the arrows. PCGs are indicated in blue, tRNA in red orange, rRNA genes in green, and CR in yellow.
Figure 4. The mitogenome of six species of family Philopotamidae: (a) Chimarra sadayu; (b) Kisaura adamickai; (c) Wormaldia spinosa; (d) Gunungiella acanthoclada; (e) Gunungiella flabellata n. sp.; (f) Gunungiella wangi n. sp. The direction of gene transcription is indicated by the arrows. PCGs are indicated in blue, tRNA in red orange, rRNA genes in green, and CR in yellow.
Insects 13 01101 g004
Insects 13 01101 g005 550
Figure 5. Evolutionary rate of each PCG of the mitogenomes of philopotamid species.
Figure 5. Evolutionary rate of each PCG of the mitogenomes of philopotamid species.
Insects 13 01101 g005
Insects 13 01101 g006 550
Figure 6. Phylogeny of Philopotamidae as inferred from analyses of the three datasets under the ML model and CAT + GTR mixture model. (a) ML tree based on the analysis of three datasets with a partitioning model in IQ-TREE. Node values represent bootstrap probabilities of PCG12, PCG12R and PCGFAA datasets, respectively. (b) Phylogeny of Philopotamidae based on PCG12R and PCG12 dataset using CAT+GTR model in phylobayes. Node supports are Bayesian posterior probabilities of PCG12R and PCG12 datasets, respectively. (c) Phylogeny of Philopotamidae based on PCGFAA dataset using CAT+GTR model in phylobayes. Node supports are Bayesian posterior probabilities.
Figure 6. Phylogeny of Philopotamidae as inferred from analyses of the three datasets under the ML model and CAT + GTR mixture model. (a) ML tree based on the analysis of three datasets with a partitioning model in IQ-TREE. Node values represent bootstrap probabilities of PCG12, PCG12R and PCGFAA datasets, respectively. (b) Phylogeny of Philopotamidae based on PCG12R and PCG12 dataset using CAT+GTR model in phylobayes. Node supports are Bayesian posterior probabilities of PCG12R and PCG12 datasets, respectively. (c) Phylogeny of Philopotamidae based on PCGFAA dataset using CAT+GTR model in phylobayes. Node supports are Bayesian posterior probabilities.
Insects 13 01101 g006
Table
Table 1. Information on the collection of 14 specimens.
Table 1. Information on the collection of 14 specimens.
SpeciesNumber of SpecimensCollection SiteTrap Type
Chimarra sadayu (Malicky, 1993)1 maleXian-xi town, Yue-qing city,
Zhe-jiang		light trap
Kisaura adamickai (Sun and Malicky, 2002)1 maleJin-xi town, Long-quan city,
Zhe-jiang		light trap
Wormaldia spinosa (Ross, 1956)1 maleXi-yang town, Yong-an city, Fu-jianlight trap
Gunungiella acanthoclada (Sun, 2007)1 maleYi-zhang county, Chen-zhou city, Hu-nanMalaise trap
Gunungiella wangi n. sp.1 maleSui-ning county, Shao-yang city, Hu-nanlight trap
Gunungiella flabellata n. sp.1 maleYi-zhang county, Chen-zhou city, Hu-nan Malaise trap
Gunungiella flabellata n. sp.7 malesHuang-keng town, Wu-yi-shan City, Fu-jianMalaise trap
Gunungiella flabellata n. sp1 male Yang-zhuang town, Wu-yi-shan city, Fu-jianlight trap
Table
Table 2. Specimens used in phylogenetic analyses.
Table 2. Specimens used in phylogenetic analyses.
SpeciesNCBI AccessionLife StageCollection SiteCollection Date
Chimarra sadayuOP351513Adult (male)Zhe-jiang27 May 2017
Kisaura adamickaiOP351517Adult (male)Zhe-jiang1 July 2021
Wormaldia spinosaOP351518Adult (male)Fu-jian28 June 2021
Gunungiella acanthocladaOP351514Adult (male)Hu-nan 8–18 August 2020
Gunungiella wangi n. sp.OP351516Adult (male)Hu-nan28 May 2021
Gunungiella flabellata n. sp.OP351515Adult (male)Hu-nan 8–18 August 2020
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, L.; Ge, X.; Shi, F.; Wang, L.; Zang, H.; Sun, C.; Wang, B. New Mitogenome Features of Philopotamidae (Insecta: Trichoptera) with Two New Species of Gunungiella. Insects 2022, 13, 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121101

AMA Style

Peng L, Ge X, Shi F, Wang L, Zang H, Sun C, Wang B. New Mitogenome Features of Philopotamidae (Insecta: Trichoptera) with Two New Species of Gunungiella. Insects. 2022; 13(12):1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Lang, Xinyu Ge, Faxian Shi, Le Wang, Haoming Zang, Changhai Sun, and Beixin Wang. 2022. "New Mitogenome Features of Philopotamidae (Insecta: Trichoptera) with Two New Species of Gunungiella" Insects 13, no. 12: 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop