Next Article in Journal
Mapping Species Distributions of Latoia consocia Walker under Climate Change Using Current Geographical Presence Data and MAXENT (CMIP 6)
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Attributes and Conservation of an Endangered Giant Water Bug Species, Diplonychus esakii Miyamoto and Lee, 1966 (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Fumigation Toxicity of Three Benzoate Compounds against Phosphine-Susceptible and Phosphine-Resistant Strains of Rhyzopertha dominica and Sitophilus oryzae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insecticidal and Repellent Activity of Essential Oils from Seven Different Plant Species against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

1
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60000, Pakistan
2
Entomological Research Sub-Station, Multan 60000, Pakistan
3
Department of Biology, College of Science, Princes Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Entomology, Mango Research Institute, Multan 60000, Pakistan
5
Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan 60000, Pakistan
6
Department of Chemistry, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abottabad Campus, Abottabad 22060, Pakistan
7
Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology Research, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 1145, Saudi Arabia
8
College of Agriculture Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(10), 755; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100755
Submission received: 16 August 2024 / Revised: 14 September 2024 / Accepted: 23 September 2024 / Published: 29 September 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The red flour beetle is the most destructive pest of stored grain commodities, including flour, food grains, biscuits, pasta, nuts, cereals, and beans. Warehouse owners mostly use fumigants to control its infestation; however, these fumigants are toxic. The Indo–Pakistan region is rich in certain plant species that have repellent or deterrent effects on insects, and these plants are safer for humans. Among these plants are Mexican tea, long leaf Indian pine, rattan pepper, garden cress, neem, Baccharis teindalensis (a Columbian native herb also found in Pakistan), and marjoram. Hence, in the present study, we determined the toxic effect of these essential oil extracts against red flour beetle. The toxicity and repellent activities of these plant oils were determined through four-arm olfactometer bioassays. Mortality was recorded 1 day, 2 days, and 3 days after oil extract exposure. Data were analyzed using statistical software. Means were compared through LSD at the 5% level of significance. Overall, Mexican tea and Indian native palm oil were effective repellents. This study concludes that Mexican tea and Indian native palm oil can be used as alternative repellents against red flour beetle infestation.

Abstract

Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) is the most destructive pest of stored grain commodities. To control the attack of this insect pest, it is important to develop non-hazardous alternatives to replace fumigants. This study examined the fumigant toxicity and repellent activity of seven essential oils (Chinopodium ambrosiodes, Pinus roxburghii, Zanthoxylum armatum, Lepidium sativum, Azadirachta indica, Baccharis teindalensis, and Origanum majorana) against adult T. castaneum under controlled laboratory conditions. The fumigant toxicity and repellent activities of essential oils were tested using five different doses (62.5, 125, 250, 500, and 1000 µg) in vapour-phase fumigation and four-arm olfactometer bioassays, respectively. In vapor-phase fumigation bioassays, mortality data were recorded after 24, 48, and 72 h. The results showed that C. ambrosiodes and P. roxburghii essential oils are potential fumigants against adult T. castaneum. In repellency bioassays, a one-week-old adult population of T. castaneum was used to test the repellency potential of the essential oils. The results indicated that C. ambrosiodes and P. roxburghii had significant repellency potential against T. castaneum. Overall, we conclude that these essential oils have strong repellent and fumigant properties and can be used as potential repellent compounds to deter the insects.

1. Introduction

The red flour beetle, T. castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), is a cosmopolitan insect pest and can be found in flour mills [1], store grain warehouses [2], and grocery shops [3]. Tribolium castaneum is a secondary pest of stored grains because it prefers feeding on damaged and broken grains or grains already infested by other pests [4]. Both adult and larva of T. castaneum feed on broken grains and directly affect the quality and quantity of stored grains and their products [5]. For example, infested grain quality is highly reduced in terms of nutritional and aesthetic value, making products unmarketable and unfit for human consumption [6]. Tribolium castaneum may cause huge quantitative losses in the form of reduced grain weight [7,8].
The protection of stored grain and its commodities from the losses of stored insect pests is very important to ensure global food security [9]. Many chemical insecticides used to control stored grain insect pests are now restricted due to their poisonous effects on non-target species, including humans and the environment [10,11]. Moreover, insecticide resistance against commercial insecticides caused the over-use of insecticides, resulting in toxic effects to the environment [12]. Methyl bromide and phosphine are the most commonly used fumigants for stored grain insect pests, but their use is restricted due to serious health risks to humans [13,14,15]. The continuous use of toxic insecticides against red flour beetle may also lead to pesticide resistance against insect pests. The continuous use of phosphine has also showed negative effects on the growth and development of stored grain insect pests [16].
Alternatively, there is a growing interest in research concerning the use of plant-derived compounds. Plant products are biodegradable and generally less toxic to humans, non-target species, and the environment [6,17]. Volatiles emitted from plants or plant-derived materials, such as plant essential oils, have shown strong insecticidal, fumigation, and repellent properties against stored grain pests [18] and negatively affect their fitness. For example, essential oils from Mentha arvensis, M. piperate, and M. spicata reduce the adult emergence rate and egg-laying capacity of the stored cowpea pest Callosobruchus maculates (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) [19].
Plant-derived essential oils, such as being not at all or the least harmful, unique in action, environmentally friendly, and safe to apply, would make them the preferred option to be used against stored grain insect pests. The expected fumigant mode of action of these botanical oils might be through penetration into the air spaces of grains, where they act as a repellent or induce the mortality of T. castaneum through its direct contact with these essential oils. The present study evaluated the repellent response and fumigant potential of seven plant-derived essential oils against adult T. castaneum. The repellent potential and toxicity of seven essential oils, viz., Chinopodium ambrosiodes, Pinus roxburghii, Zanthoxylum armatum, Lepidium sativum, Azadirachta indica, Baccharis teindalensis, and Origanum majorana, were assessed through olfactometer and vapor-phase toxicity bioassays, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Rearing

The experiment was conducted at Bhauddin Zakariya University, Multan. Mass culture of the red flour beetle, T. castaneum, was established in the laboratory without any exposure to chemical insecticides. The culture was maintained in plastic jars (1.5 L) containing wheat flour mixed with yeast (8:2) on weight basis. The plastic jars were covered with muslin cloth for ventilation. The culture was kept under controlled conditions (27 ± 2 °C; 65 ± 5% RH) in the dark. Jars were checked every 7th day, and newly emerged adults were separated from culture media using 60 mm mesh and put into new jars. Adult beetles aged 1–7 days old were used for toxicity and repellency bioassays.

2.2. Collection of Plant Materials and Extraction of Essential Oils

Fresh aerial parts of the plants (C. ambrosiodes, P. roxburghii, Z. armatum, L. sativum, A. indica, B. teindalensis and O. majorana) were collected from Abbottabad, Pakistan, during July–August 2016. Collected plants were identified by a taxonomist at the Department of Environmental Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad campus, Abbottabad, Pakistan. Fresh plant parts were kept in a freezer at −20 °C for at least 24 h prior to extraction. Essential oils of collected plants were extracted by using a stainless-steel distillation apparatus following Rao and Pandey [20] with some modifications.
The aerial parts of each collected plant sample were crushed into small pieces with a knife and weighed. About 1500 g of each sample was then placed in a sieve compartment of a vessel with 2 L of distilled water. An electric hot plate was used to heat the vessel. Due to heating pressure, the condensed water vapors moved through the vessel and plant sample present on the sieved compartment. The packed plant sample released volatile compounds, which were then cooled into a distillate by a condenser. The distillate was collected for 4 h and was subjected to liquid extraction using n-hexane. Essential oils extracted at different time intervals per plant species were pooled and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate to remove water. Solvent was evaporated by rotary evaporator to reduced pressure at 25 °C. Each essential oil sample was weighed to determine percentage yield. Finally, extracted essential oils were stored at −20 °C in a glass vial until analysis and used for fumigation and repellent bioassays.

2.3. Fumigation Bioassay

The toxicity of essential oils on T. castaneum adults was tested by vapor-phase toxicity bioassay in 15 mL glass vials [21]. Seven different essential oils (C. ambrosiodes, P. roxburghii, Z. armatum, L. sativum, A. indica, B. teindalensis and O. majorana) were used in a fumigation bioassay. A strip (1 cm wide and 5 cm long) of Whatman No. 1 filter paper was taken, and a 10 µL aliquot of different essential oil concentrations (100 µg/mL, 50 µg/mL, 25 µg/mL, 12.5 µg/mL, 6.12 µg/mL) was prepared separately and kept at room temperature for 2–3 min to evaporate the solvent (ethanol). For each replicate, a filter strip was suspended in the glass vial, and tube cap was screwed tightly after adding 10 adult beetles and 1 g of crushed grains into each tube. An ethanol filter paper strip was used as a negative control. Each treatment and negative control was replicated five times. Mortality was checked after 24, 48, and 72 h following exposure. Adults were considered dead if appendages did not move when prodded with a fine entomological pin.

2.4. Repellency Bioassays

A four-arm olfactometer was used to evaluate the response of T. castaneum adults to different treatments: crushed grains, crushed grains + essential oils, ethanol + crushed grains, and empty as a control. The glass olfactometer had an upper and lower layer with dimensions of 12 × 12 × 1.2 cm and 10.2 × 10.2 × 0.6 cm, respectively. These two glass layers consisted of four openings along four regions (Figure 1). A small outlet (4 mm diameter) was present in the center upper glass plate for a T. castaneum adult to enter. Each arm of the olfactometer was made of socket glasses that were connected with the three glass vials (50 mL). Each glass vial contained either the treatment, a charcoal purification filter or water treatment. Air pressure was controlled using an air flow meter (4 Pa). A battery having dual-pump system was used to regulate within olfactometer.
The air flow was passed through the air entrainment system (KNF Neuberger, Freiburg Berisgau, Germany) through Teflon tubing measuring 3.2 × 1.5 (Camlab Ltd., Cambridge, UK). Adult beetles were singly placed in the center of olfactometer, the position of beetles was observed visually, and data were recorded for five minutes using a stopwatch. In each bioassay, twenty replicates (individual beetles) were used to test the response of T. castaneum to treatments. The number of entries per treatment and time spent in each treatment were recorded. An initial bioassay was performed to check beetle responsiveness, where two olfactometer arms contained 2 g of crushed grain and the other two arms contained 2 g whole grain.
This was followed by the repellency bioassay. One arm contained filter paper impregnated with different concentrations of essential oils (62.5 µg, 125 µg, 250 µg, 500 µg, and 1000 µg) and crushed grain. The other three arms contained 2 positive controls: (i) 2 g of crushed grains; (ii) crushed grains + strip of filter paper impregnated with ethanol and one negative control (empty arm). In all bioassays, 10 µL of different concentrations of essential oils was applied on filter paper. The olfactometer experiment involved uniform exposure under a fluorescent light.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistics 8.1 software was used to analyze experimental data. Time spent by T. castaneum in the four different treatments (arms) of the olfactometer was evaluated using one-way ANOVA. In fumigation bioassays, the mean mortality rate of T. castaneum was evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and a comparison was made through LSD test at 5% level of significance.

3. Results

3.1. Repellent Effects of C. ambrosiodes against T. castaneum

The results of four-arm olfactometer bioassays showed that the tested oils inhibited the attraction of the T. castaneum towards food material. Adult T. castaneum spent less time in arms either emitting volatile compounds of C. ambrosiodes essential oil with grain (food bait) or in the empty arm (negative control), as compared to the two other treatments (grains or grains + ethanol). The results of one-way ANOVA showed that oil maintained potential significant repellency at different doses i.e., 62.5 µg (p = 0.000, F = 8.92, DF = 3), 125 µg (p = 0.0000, F = 10.1, DF = 3), 250 µg (p = 0.0000, F = 10.5, DF = 3; 500 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 15.0 DF = 3; and 1000 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 16.6, DF = 3) (Figure 2).

3.2. Repellent Effects of P. roxburghii against T. castaneum

P. roxburghii oils inhibited the attraction of T. castaneum towards food material. Adult T. castaneum spent less time in arms either emitting volatile compounds of P. roxburghii essential oil with grain (food bait) or in the empty arm (negative control), as compared to the two other treatments (grains or grains + solvent (ethanol)). The result of one-way ANOVA showed that oil had a great repellent potential at different doses of essential oil (62.5 µg: p = 0.0002, F = 7.65, DF = 3; 125 µg: p = 0.0001, F = 8.03, DF = 3; 250 µg: p = 0.0002, F = 7.28, DF = 3; 500 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 12.5, DF = 3; 1000 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 14.9, DF = 3) (Figure 3).

3.3. Repellent Effects of Z. armatum against T. castaneum

Z. armatum oil inhibited the attraction of T. castaneum towards the food material. Adult T. castaneum spent less time in the arms either emitting volatile compounds of Z. armatum seed essential oil with grains (food bait) or in the empty arm (negative control), as compared to the two other treatments (grains or grains + solvent (ethanol)). The result of one-way ANOVA showed that Z. armatum seed oil has great repellency potential at all tested doses towards adult beetles of T. castaneum (e.g., 62.5 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 11.8, DF = 3; 125 µg: p = 0.0002, F = 7.60, DF = 3; 250 µg: p = 0.0008, F = 6.18, DF = 3; 500 µg: p = 0.000, F = 10.6, DF = 3; 1000 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 11.6, DF = 3) (Figure 4).

3.4. Repellent Effects of L. sativum against T. castaneum

L. sativum oil inhibited the attraction of T. castaneum towards the food material. Adults of T. castaneum spent significantly less time in the arm of the olfactometer, emitting either volatile compounds of L. sativum essential oil in addition to the grains (food bait) or in the empty arm (negative control), as compared to the two other treatments (grains or grains + solvent (ethanol)). The result of one-way ANOVA showed that oil maintained potential repellency at different doses of essential oil (e.g., 625 µg: p = 0.0003, F = 8.92, DF = 3; 125 µg: p = 0.0002, F = 7.59, DF = 3; 250 µg: p = 0.0003, F = 6.96, DF = 3; 500 µg: p = 0.0002, F = 7.23, DF = 3; 1000 µg p = 0.0000, F = 9.45, DF = 3) (Figure 5).

3.5. Repellent Effects of A. indica against T. castaneum

A. indica oils inhibited the attraction of T. castaneum towards the food material. Adults of T. castaneum spent significantly less time in the arm of the olfactometer, emitting either volatile compounds of A. indica essential oil in addition to the grains (food bait) or in the empty arm (negative control), as compared to the two other treatments (grains or grains + solvent (ethanol)). The result of one-way ANOVA showed that oil maintained potential repellency at different doses of essential oil (62.5 µg: p = 0.000, F = 13.1, DF = 3; 125 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 10.6, DF = 3; 250 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 9.21, DF = 3; 500 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 14.7 D, F = 3; 1000 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 11.6, DF = 3) (Figure 6).

3.6. Repellent Effects of B. teindalensis against T. castaneum

The result of four-arm olfactometer bioassays showed that the tested oil inhibited the attraction of T. castaneum towards the food material. Adults of T. castaneum spent significantly less time in the arm of the olfactometer, emitting either volatile compounds of B. teindalensis essential oil in addition to the grains (food bait) or in the empty arm (negative control), as compared to the two other treatments (grains or grains + solvent (ethanol)). The result of one-way ANOVA showed that oil maintained strong repellency at different doses of essential oil (62.5 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 8.79, DF = 3; 125 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 14.4, DF = 3; 250 µg: p = 0.0001, F = 7.87, DF = 3; 500 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 8.78, DF = 3; 1000 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 11.1, DF = 3) (Figure 7).

3.7. Repellent Effects of O. majorana against T. castaneum

The results of the behavior bioassay, conducted in the four-arm olfactometer, showed that the tested oils inhibited the attraction of T. castaneum towards the food material. Adults of T. castaneum spent significantly less time in the arm of the olfactometer, emitting either volatile compounds of O. majorana oil in addition to the grains (food bait) or the empty arm (negative arm), as compared to the two other treatments (grains or grains + solvent (ethanol)). The result of one-way ANOVA showed that essential oil was a great repellent potential towards adult beetles of T. castaneum at different doses of essential oil (62.5 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 8.79, DF = 3; 125 µg: p = 0.0000, F = 14.4, DF = 3; 250 µg: p = 0.0001, F = 7.87, DF = 3; 500 µg p = 0.0000, F = 8.78, DF = 3; 1000 µg p = 0.0000, F = 11.1, DF = 3) (Figure 8).

3.8. Insecticidal Effects of Essential Oils in T. castaneum after 24 h

The one-way ANOVA analysis of mortality caused by fumigants at 1000 µg/mL after 24 h showed significant differences (DF = 7; F = 2289; p < 0.01). The highest mortality of adult T. casteneum was caused by C. ambrosiodes essential oil at all tested doses (1000 µg, 500 µg, 250 µg, 125 µg and 62.5 µg) after 24 h, as compared to the respective doses of all other essential oils tested (Figure 9). The mortality pattern showed that at a 1000 µg dose, C. ambrosiodes caused the highest mortality (92.6%), followed by P. roxburghii (64.4%), Z. armatum (46.4%), B. teindalensis (26.4%), O. majorana (18.4%), A. indica (16.6%), and L. sativum (14.4%). Likewise, at a 500 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in the adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (95%), followed by P. roxburghii (44.8%) and Z. armatum (31.2%), B. teindalensis (14.2%), O. majorana (11.2%), A. indica (11%), and L. sativum (9.4%) (DF = 7; F = 1041; p = 0.00). Likewise, at a 250 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (85%), followed by P. roxburghii (32%), Z. armatum (22.2%), B. teindalensis (9.8%), O. majorana (7.6%), A. indica (5.6%), and L. sativum (5.4%) (DF = 7; F = 1041; p = 0.00). Similarly, at a 125 µg dose, a significant difference in mortality was observed (DF = 7; F = 3.70; p = 0.004). At a 125 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (71.4%), followed by P. roxburghii (22.4%) and Z. armatum (16.6%), B. teindalensis (5.6%), O. majorana (5.2%), L. sativum (4%), and A. indica (3.8%). Likewise, at a 62.5 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (60.1%), followed by P. roxburghii (22.4%), Z. armatum (11.8%), B. teindalensis (5%), O. majorana (1.8%), L. sativum (1.8%), and A. indica (1.6%).

3.9. Insecticidal Effects of Essential Oils on T. castaneum after 48 h

The highest mortality of adult T. castaneum was caused by C. ambrosiodes essential oil at all tested doses (1000 µg, 500 µg, 250 µg, 125 µg and 62.5 µg) after 48 h, as compared to the respective doses of all other essential oils tested (Figure 10). The mortality pattern showed that at a 1000 µg dose, C. ambrosiodes caused the highest mortality (99%), followed by P. roxburghii (77.2%), Z. armatum (73.6%), A. indica (49%), B. teindalensis (42.8%), O. majorana (37%), L. sativum (33%), and control (0%) (DF = 7; F = 2290; p = 0.00) (Figure 10). Likewise, at a 500 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (98%), followed by P. roxburghii (56.2%), Z. armatum (29.8%), A. indica (29.8%), B. teindalensis (11.8%), O. majorana (9%), L. sativum (7.6%), and control (0%) (DF = 7; F = 2311; p = 0.00) (Figure 10). Likewise, at a 250 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (89%), followed by P. roxburghii (48%) Z. armatum (60%), B. teindalensis (13.8%), O. majorana (9%), L. sativum (7.6%), and control (0.0%) (DF = 7; F = 3272; p = 0.00) (Figure 10). Likewise, at a 125 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in C. ambrosiodes (90.8%), followed by P. roxburghii (36.4%), Z. armatum (34%), L. sativum (14.8%), A. indica (13.2%), B. teindalensis (7.4), O. majorana (7.4%), and control (0.0%) (DF = 7; F = 2577; p = 0.00). The three oils (B. teindalensis, O. majorana, L. sativum) caused the lowest mortality in all doses after 48 h of adult beetle exposure. Likewise, at a 62.5 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (82%), followed by P. roxburghii (26.2%), Z. armatum (15.8%), L. sativum (11.2%), A. indica (9%), B. teindalensis (7.4%), O. majorana (4.4%), and control (DF = 7; F = 1421; p = 0.00) (Figure 10).
The one-way ANOVA analysis of mortality caused by fumigants at 1000 µg/mL after 24 h showed a significant difference (DF = 7; 997; p < 0.00). The highest mortality of adult T. castaneum was caused by C. ambrosiodes essential oil at all tested doses (1000 µg, 500 µg, 250 µg, 125 µg and 62.5 µg) after 72 h, as compared to the respective doses of all other essential oils tested (Figure 11). At a 1000 µg dose, C. ambrosiodes caused the highest mortality (100%), followed by P. roxburghii (85.4%) Z. armatum (81.6%), A. indica (58.6%), B. teindalensis (49.6%), L. sativum (49%), O. majorana (47.2%), and control (Figure 11). Likewise, at a 500 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (100%), followed by P. roxburghii (62.8%), Z. armatum (39.6%), L. sativum (15.2%), B. teindalensis (14.4%), A. indica (13.8%), O. majorana (10.8%), and control (0.0%) (DF = 7; F = 164; p = 0.00) (Figure 11). Likewise, at a 250 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes (94.4%), followed by P. roxburghii (48.6%) Z. armatum (63.6%), A. indica, B. teindalensis (13.6%), O. majorana (19.8%), L. sativum (17.8%), and control (0.0) (DF = 7; F = 3687; p = 0.00) (Figure 11). Likewise, at a 125 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in C. ambrosiodes (90.8%), followed by P. roxburghii (35.6%), Z. armatum (37.8%), A. indica (12%), B. teindalensis (11%), O. majorana (7.4%), L. sativum (14.8%), and control (0.0%) (DF = 7; F = 2446; p = 0.00). The three oils (B. teindalensis, O. majorana, L. sativum) caused the lowest mortality in all doses after 72 h of adult beetle exposure. Likewise, at a 62.5 µg dose, the highest mortality was observed in adults exposed to C. ambrosiodes, followed by P. roxburghii Z. armatum, A. indica, B. teindalensis, O. majorana, L. sativum, and control (DF7; F = 1951; p = 0.00) (Figure 11).

4. Discussion

Plant-based botanical insecticides are environmentally friendly, safer for humans, less expensive, and biodegradable. Plant products such as essential oils are considered one of the most important natural chemicals to control insect pests of stored grains. It has been shown that essential oils exhibit insecticidal toxicity, anti-feeding, and repellence or deterrence against stored grain insect pests [22,23]. The toxic effects of using certain botanical essential oils against stored grain insect pests via fumigation have been reported by many scientists [24,25,26]. In our study, seven different essential oils exhibited good repellent activity and fumigant toxicity against adults of T. castaneum via four-arm olfactometer bioassays and fumigation assays. The results of our study are correlated with previous investigations. For example, Lee, Annis, and Choi [26] showed that Eu. nicholi, Eu. blakeli, Eu. codonocarpa, Melleuca fulgens, Callistemon sieberi, and M. armillaris essential oils were toxic against three stored grain insect species: T. castaneum, S. oryzae, and R. dominica. O. vulgare essential oil and its components showed potential as fumigants and repellents against adult T. castaneum [25].
Our study found that C. ambrosiodes essential oil repelled and killed T. castaneum. This effect may be due to the presence of chemical compounds in the oil, such as α-terpinene (30.3%), p-cymene (13.5%), ascaridole (30.6%), and isoascaridole (23.6%). Several studies have characterized the chemical composition, fumigation toxicity, and repellent potential of compounds found in C. ambrosiodes essential oil. For example, Kasali et al. [27] reported that C. ambrosiodes essential oil contained major components, such as α-terpinene (55.55%), p-cymene (16.71%), β-pinene (0.29%), limonene (1.09%), sabinene (1.50%), γ-terpinene (0.97%), phytol (0.38%), 1,4-epoxy-p-menth-2-ene (17.72%), (E)-β-ocimene (0.27%), and 1,2,3,4-diepoxy-p-menthane (0.14%). Chu et al. [28] reported that C. ambrosiodes essential oil contains five active components: α-terpinene, ρ-cymene, (Z)-ascaridole, isoascaridole, and 2-carene. They also reported the fumigant and contact toxicity of these components against the stored grain pest, S. zeamais. Previously, C. ambrosioides (powder and essential oil) has been used against six stored grain species: C. maculates, P. truncates, C. chinensis, S. granarius, Acanthoscelides obtectus, and S. zeamais. They caused high mortality [29].
P. roxburghii also showed great repellence and fumigant toxicity against adult T. castaneum. The results of our study are consistent with previous investigations. Three essential oils, M. piperita, P. roxburghii, and Rosa spp., showed strong fumigant toxicity against the stored grain insect pests: T. castaneum, R. dominica, and S. oryzae. The results showed that P. roxburghii was a potential fumigant against R. dominica and S. oryzae, with maximum percentage mortalities of 70% and 80%, respectively [30]. Similarly, another study also showed that essential oils of A. sativum, Artimisia annua, Callistemon citrinus, C. botrys, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Citrus reticulate, Cuminum cyminum, Foeniculum vulgare, Murraya koenigii, P. roxburghii, Piper nigram, and P. roxburghii showed high insecticidal activity against R. dominica, T. castaneum, S. oryzae, and C. chinensis [31].
Similarly, Z. armatum also showed strong fumigant and repellent activity against adult T. castaneum. Further, some mosquito studies showed Z. armatum and its chemical components had higher larvicidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus compared to Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi [32]. Another report showed high toxicity of essential oil derived from Z. armatum and its components against T. castaneum and Laisoderma serricorne. Fumigation and contact toxicity were determined for these two stored grain insect pests. Both the fumigation and contact bioassays for Z. armatum essential oil showed high toxicity against T. castaneum and L. serricorne [33].
In our study, the remaining four essential oils (A. indica, L. sativum, B. teindalensis, and O. majorana) showed low mortality percentages in fumigant toxicity bioassays but were still moderately repellent toward adult T. castaneum. Previously, the repellent and fumigation potentials of different essential oils extracted from some indigenous plants such as A. indica, D. stramonium, and Melia azedarach were reported against three insect pests species: R. dominica, T. castaneum, and T. granarium. Two pest species (T. castaneum and R. dominica) were repelled by A. indica in experiments [34].
Previously, the repellent activity and fumigant toxicity of L. sativum to the 5th instar larvae of T. granarium showed strong larvicidal activity at different tested concentrations, while the repellency results showed that L. sativum essential oil was not repellent [35]. This indicates that an essential oil may have larvicidal activity but does not repel. Our results also showed varying activities in fumigation bioassays or the repellence bioassays.
Likewise, the repellent potential and fumigant toxicity of O. majorana essential oil extracted from leaves and flowers were tested against adult T. castaneum and larval Plodia interpunctella. The results showed that O. majorana essential oil from leaves caused more insecticidal activity towards adult T. castaneum, while the essential oil from flowers of O. majorana showed more repellent potential towards T. castaneum [36]. This indicates that an essential oil extracted from different stages or different parts of a plant may have varying levels of fumigation and repellent potential towards the target pests. Results from Padin et al. [37,38] also support our results, where B. trimera showed low insecticidal and repellence potential against T. castaneum adults.

5. Conclusions

Plant-derived essential oils and their constituents have a fumigant and repellent potential against T. castaneum. Three essential oils, e.g., C. ambrosiodes, P. roxburghii, and Z. armatum, exhibited strong fumigant toxicity and repellency through vapor-phase toxicity and olfactometer bioassays against adult T. castaneum. The information obtained from this study will enhance our knowledge about the potential use of these essential oils to control other stored grain insect pests. Finally, taking into account the fumigation toxicity and repellence results of these essential oils, future semi-field studies should be conducted. A critical analysis of the potential economic implications of these essential oils is required, so we further recommend the development of commercial products to be used in stored grain insect pest management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B. and M.K. (Mishal Khizar); methodology, M.K. (Misha Khalil) and M.K. (Mishal Khizar); software, M.K. (Mishal Khizar); validation, A.H., M.K. (Misha Khalil), N.M. and Q.A.; formal analysis, M.H.; investigation, M.K. (Mishal Khizar) and M.A.; resources, M.B., D.S.A. and K.A.A.; data curation, M.K. (Mishal Khizar) and A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K. (Mishal Khizar); writing—review and editing, M.B. and A.H.; visualization, M.B.; supervision, M.B.; project administration, M.B.; funding acquisition, M.B., T.A.S., D.S.A. and K.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research study was funded by Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers, Supporting Project number (PNURSP2024R465), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

All data related to this study are contained within the research paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers, Supporting Project number (PNURSP2024R465), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors gratefully acknowledge Muhammad Razzaq, Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture and Advanced Studies, for critical review of the manuscript to improve the English. The authors of the paper are thankful to Um-Hani and Amna Khan for help and support during the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Semeao, A.A.; Campbell, J.F.; Whitworth, R.J.; Sloderbeck, P.E. Influence of environmental and physical factors on capture of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in a flour mill. J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 686–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mariadoss, A.; Umamaheswari, S. Feeding preference and development of red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) in different rice varieties stored for public distribution in India. J. Exp. Zool. India 2020, 23, 265–268. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rees, D. Insects of Stored Grain: A Pocket Reference; CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Trematerra, P.; Sciarreta, A.; Tamasi, E. Behavioural responses of Oryzaephilus surinamensis, Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum to naturally and artificially damaged durum wheat kernels. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2000, 94, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abdullahi, G.; Muhamad, R.; Sule, H. Biology, host range and management of red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): A review. Taraba J. Agric. Res. 2019, 7, 48–64. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar, R. Insect Pests of Stored Grain: Biology, Behavior, and Management Strategies; Apple Academic Press: Palm Bay, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Padın, S.; Dal Bello, G.; Fabrizio, M. Grain loss caused by Tribolium castaneum, Sitophilus oryzae and Acanthoscelides obtectus in stored durum wheat and beans treated with Beauveria bassiana. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2002, 38, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shafique, M.; Ahmad, M.; Chaudry, M.A. Feeding preference and development of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) in wheat products. Pak. J. Zool. 2006, 38, 27. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao, F.; Qi, Y.; Hamadou, A.H.; Zhang, J.; Manzoor, M.F.; Guo, Q.; Xu, B. Enhancing wheat-flour safety by detecting and controlling red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2022, 17, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Upadhyay, R.K.; Ahmad, S. Management strategies for control of stored grain insect pests in farmer stores and public ware houses. World J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 7, 527–549. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernardes, M.F.F.; Pazin, M.; Pereira, L.C.; Dorta, D.J. Impact of pesticides on environmental and human health. In Toxicology Studies—Cells, Drugs and Environment; BoD—Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2015; pp. 195–233. [Google Scholar]
  12. Attia, M.A.; Wahba, T.F.; Shaarawy, N.; Moustafa, F.I.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Dewer, Y. Stored grain pest prevalence and insecticide resistance in Egyptian populations of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (L.). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 87, 101611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Budnik, L.T.; Kloth, S.; Velasco-Garrido, M.; Baur, X. Prostate cancer and toxicity from critical use exemptions of methyl bromide: Environmental protection helps protect against human health risks. Environ. Health 2012, 11, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaushik, R. Methyl bromide: Risk assessment, environmental, and health hazard. In Hazardous Gases; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 239–250. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sciuto, A.M.; Wong, B.J.; Martens, M.E.; Hoard-Fruchey, H.; Perkins, M.W. Phosphine toxicity: A story of disrupted mitochondrial metabolism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1374, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sousa, A.; Faroni, L.R.D.; Pimentel, M.; Guedes, R. Developmental and population growth rates of phosphine-resistant and-susceptible populations of stored-product insect pests. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2009, 45, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rozman, V.; Kalinović, I.; Korunić, Z. Toxicity of naturally occurring compounds of Lamiaceae and Lauraceae to three stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2007, 43, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Isman, M. Pesticides based on plant essential oils. J. Pestic. Outlook 1999, 10, 68–72. [Google Scholar]
  19. Raja, N.; Albert, S.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Dorn, S. Effect of plant volatile oils in protecting stored cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infestation. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2001, 37, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rao, V.P.; Pandey, D. Extraction of Essential Oil and Its Applications. Ph.D. Dissertation, Biju Patnaik Central Library, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha, India, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Adam, F.; Bertoncini, F.; Thiébaut, D.; Esnault, S.; Espinat, D.; Hennion, M. Towards comprehensive hydrocarbons analysis of middle distillates by LC-GC× GC. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2007, 45, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sarkar, M.; Akulwad, A.; Kshirsagar, R. A novel non-contact bioassay method for quantitative evaluation of vapour phase toxicity of insecticides against mosquitoes. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2018, 21, 1315–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Isman, M.B. Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Prot. 2000, 19, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singh, G.; Upadhyay, R. Essential oils-a potent source of natural pesticides. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1993, 52, 676–683. [Google Scholar]
  25. Negahban, M.; Moharramipour, S.; Sefidkon, F. Fumigant toxicity of essential oil from Artemisia sieberi Besser against three stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2007, 43, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, S.-I.; Yoon, J.-S.; Jung, J.W.; Hong, K.-B.; Ahn, Y.-J.; Kwon, H.W. Toxicity and repellency of origanum essential oil and its components against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) adults. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2010, 13, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, B.-H.; Annis, P.C.; Choi, W.-S. Fumigant toxicity of essential oils from the Myrtaceae family and 1, 8-cineole against 3 major stored-grain insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2004, 40, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kasali, A.A.; Ekundayo, O.; Paul, C.; König, W.A.; Eshilokun, A.O.; Ige, B. 1,2:3,4-diepoxy-p-menthane and 1,4-epoxy-p-menth-2-ene: Rare monoterpenoids from the essential oil of Chenopodium ambrosioides L. var ambrosioides leaves. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 18, 13–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chu, S.S.; Feng Hu, J.; Liu, Z.L. Composition of essential oil of Chinese Chenopodium ambrosioides and insecticidal activity against maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 714–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tapondjou, L.; Adler, C.; Bouda, H.; Fontem, D. Efficacy of powder and essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides leaves as post-harvest grain protectants against six-stored product beetles. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2002, 38, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mackled, M.I.; EL-Hefny, M.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Wahba, T.F.; Allam, A.A. Assessment of the toxicity of natural oils from Mentha piperita, Pinus roxburghii, and Rosa spp. against three stored product insects. Processes 2019, 7, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, R.; Tiwari, S.N. Fumigant toxicity of essential oils against four major storage insect pests. Indian J. Entomol. 2017, 79, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tiwary, M.; Naik, S.; Tewary, D.K.; Mittal, P.; Yadav, S. Chemical composition and larvicidal activities of the essential oil of Zanthoxylum armatum DC (Rutaceae) against three mosquito vectors. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2007, 44, 198. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, C.-F.; Zhang, W.-J.; You, C.-X.; Guo, S.-S.; Geng, Z.-F.; Fan, L.; Du, S.-S.; Deng, Z.-W.; Wang, Y.-Y. Insecticidal constituents of essential oil derived from Zanthoxylum armatum against two stored-product insects. J. Oleo Sci. 2015, 64, 861–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hanif, C.M.S.; Ul-Hasan, M.; Shagger, M.; Saleem, S.; Akthar, S.; Ijaz, M. Insecticidal and repellent activities of essential oils of three medicinal plants towards insect pests of stored wheat. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 22, 470–476. [Google Scholar]
  36. Al-Fuhaid, N. Can a Garden Cress (Lepidium sativum: Cruciferae) Seeds be a Poisonous Bait for the Larvae of Trogoderma granarium Everts? World J. Agric. Res. 2018, 6, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Salaheddine, S.; Zohra, B.; Cheikh, I.; Asma, L. Study of the toxicity of essential oils of Origanum majorana on Tribolium castaneum and Plodia interpunctella (stored product insects). Tunis. J. Med. Plants Nat. Prod. 2013, 9, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  38. Padin, S.B.; Fuse, C.B.; Urrutia, M.I.; Dal Bello, G. Toxicity and Repellency of Nine Medicinal Plants against Tribolium castaneum in Stored Wheat. Bull. Insectol. 2013, 66, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the four-arm olfactometer used in the bioassays. Here A, B, C, and D are four opening of four armed olfactometer.
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the four-arm olfactometer used in the bioassays. Here A, B, C, and D are four opening of four armed olfactometer.
Insects 15 00755 g001
Figure 2. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of C. ambrosiodes essential oil as compared to three controls (Grain, Grain + solvent, Empty). Red flour beetle spent less time in grain + C. ambrosides compared to other treatments in all doses 62.5 µg, 125 µg, 250 µg, 500 µg, and 1000 µg. Here the letters (A,B) represents the ranks obtained by comparing means among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 2. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of C. ambrosiodes essential oil as compared to three controls (Grain, Grain + solvent, Empty). Red flour beetle spent less time in grain + C. ambrosides compared to other treatments in all doses 62.5 µg, 125 µg, 250 µg, 500 µg, and 1000 µg. Here the letters (A,B) represents the ranks obtained by comparing means among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g002
Figure 3. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of P. roxburghii essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Overall, the red flour beetle spent significantly less time in grain + P. roxburgii. Here the letters (A,B) represents the ranks obtained by comparing means among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 3. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of P. roxburghii essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Overall, the red flour beetle spent significantly less time in grain + P. roxburgii. Here the letters (A,B) represents the ranks obtained by comparing means among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g003
Figure 4. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of Z. armatum seed essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here the letters (A,B) represents the ranks obtained by comparing means among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 4. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of Z. armatum seed essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here the letters (A,B) represents the ranks obtained by comparing means among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g004
Figure 5. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of L. sativum seed essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here, the letters (A,B) represent the ranks obtained by comparing means among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 5. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of L. sativum seed essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here, the letters (A,B) represent the ranks obtained by comparing means among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g005
Figure 6. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of A. indica essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here, the letters (A,B) represent the ranks obtained by comparing means in among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 6. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of A. indica essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here, the letters (A,B) represent the ranks obtained by comparing means in among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g006
Figure 7. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of B. teindalensis essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here, the letters (A,B,C) represent the ranks obtained by comparing means in among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 7. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of B. teindalensis essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here, the letters (A,B,C) represent the ranks obtained by comparing means in among treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g007
Figure 8. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of O. majorana seed essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here, the letters (A,B,C) represent the ranks obtained by comparing means iamong treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 8. Average time spent by T. castaneum in response to different doses of O. majorana seed essential oil as compared to three controls (grain, grain + solvent, empty). Here, the letters (A,B,C) represent the ranks obtained by comparing means iamong treatments through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g008
Figure 9. Fumigation toxicity at different doses of essential oils after 24 h against T. castaneum adults. The one-way ANOVA analysis was performed separately for each dose through Statistix 8.1. Here, the letters a–g represent ranks obtained through comparing means through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 9. Fumigation toxicity at different doses of essential oils after 24 h against T. castaneum adults. The one-way ANOVA analysis was performed separately for each dose through Statistix 8.1. Here, the letters a–g represent ranks obtained through comparing means through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g009
Figure 10. Fumigation toxicity at different doses of essential oils after 72 h against T. castaneum adult. The one-way ANOVA analysis was done separately for each dose through Statistix 8.1. Here, the letters a–h represent ranks obtained through comparing means through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance. Insecticidal effects of essential oils in T. castaneum after 72 h.
Figure 10. Fumigation toxicity at different doses of essential oils after 72 h against T. castaneum adult. The one-way ANOVA analysis was done separately for each dose through Statistix 8.1. Here, the letters a–h represent ranks obtained through comparing means through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance. Insecticidal effects of essential oils in T. castaneum after 72 h.
Insects 15 00755 g010
Figure 11. Fumigation toxicity at different doses of essential oils after 72 h against T. castaneum adults. The one-way ANOVA analysis was done separately for each dose through Statistix 8.1. Here, the letters a–f represent ranks obtained through comparing means through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Figure 11. Fumigation toxicity at different doses of essential oils after 72 h against T. castaneum adults. The one-way ANOVA analysis was done separately for each dose through Statistix 8.1. Here, the letters a–f represent ranks obtained through comparing means through Tukey HSD at 5% level of significance.
Insects 15 00755 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khalil, M.; Khizar, M.; Alshaya, D.S.; Hameed, A.; Muhammad, N.; Binyameen, M.; Azeem, M.; Hussain, M.; Abbas, Q.; Attia, K.A.; et al. Insecticidal and Repellent Activity of Essential Oils from Seven Different Plant Species against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Insects 2024, 15, 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100755

AMA Style

Khalil M, Khizar M, Alshaya DS, Hameed A, Muhammad N, Binyameen M, Azeem M, Hussain M, Abbas Q, Attia KA, et al. Insecticidal and Repellent Activity of Essential Oils from Seven Different Plant Species against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Insects. 2024; 15(10):755. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100755

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khalil, Misha, Mishal Khizar, Dalal Suleiman Alshaya, Asifa Hameed, Noor Muhammad, Muhammad Binyameen, Muhammad Azeem, Mussurat Hussain, Qaisar Abbas, Kotb A. Attia, and et al. 2024. "Insecticidal and Repellent Activity of Essential Oils from Seven Different Plant Species against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)" Insects 15, no. 10: 755. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100755

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop