Next Article in Journal
Discovering Native Ant Species with the Potential to Suppress Red Imported Fire Ants
Previous Article in Journal
A New Endemic Locality of Dermacentor reticulatus in Central–Southern Poland and Its Potential Epidemiological Implications
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Integrated Pest Management Strategy Approach for the Management of the Stable Fly Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/insects15080581
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Detection and Analysis of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) spp. Diversity in Tabanidae (Diptera) Collected in Lithuania

by
Jurga Turčinavičienė
*,
Rasa Bernotienė
and
Andrius Petrašiūnas
*
Department of Zoology, Institute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center of Vilnius University, Saulėtekio Av. 7, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(8), 581; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080581
Submission received: 27 June 2024 / Revised: 16 July 2024 / Accepted: 27 July 2024 / Published: 30 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flies of Veterinary Importance: Biology, Ecology and Control)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Horse flies are known as vectors of various species of trypanosomatids. The aim of this study was to investigate Trypanosoma in the Tabanidae family collected in different localities in Lithuania. Our objectives were to examine the genetic diversity of Trypanosoma sp. detected in tabanids, assessing the relationships between parasite lineages and tabanid species. The present study reports on the molecular detection and genetic diversity of trypanosomes in 10 species of tabanids, with two of them being reported for the first time. The findings suggest that different strains of the T. theileri complex are not related to different tabanid species.

Abstract

Trypanosomatids from the Tabanidae family have not been studied in Lithuania in any detail. In this study, a nested PCR amplifying the DNA fragment coding the SSU rRNA was used to determine the Trypanosoma spp. prevalence and diversity in the Tabanidae family collected in Lithuania in 2018–2019. In total, 101 Tabanidae individuals were investigated from six areas in Lithuania, and 14 different species were identified. The overall positivity of Trypanosoma spp. DNA in tabanids was 50.5% (51/101). Tabanus maculicornis was the most abundant species and yielded the highest prevalence of trypanosomatids (84.62%, 22/26), while Hybomitra nitidifrons showed a high prevalence as well, reaching 77.8% (14/18). In flies of some species (Hybomitra lapponica and Hybomitra lurida), Trypanosoma was detected for the first time. Nine different haplotypes were detected as being distributed in different tabanid species. Analysis showed that most sequences obtained during our study were identical or extremely close to two major T. theileri subclades: TthI and TthII. Our data analysis suggests the presence of different Trypanosoma genotypes in the same tabanid species, meaning that different lineages of Trypanosoma could be more related to the vertebrate host and not the fly species. This is the first study of trypanosomatid parasites in tabanids from Lithuania, and our results are valuable in providing data on the diversity of these parasites in different Tabanidae species.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The family Tabanidae (Diptera) consists of haematophagous insects which, due to their lifestyle and feeding behavior, play a role as vectors in the mechanical and biological transmission of a large variety of disease agents. However, distinct species of Tabanidae can act as vectors of different pathogens.
Thirty-nine Tabanidae (horsefly and deer fly) species have been detected thus far in Lithuania [1], although there are no data regarding the abundance of each species in the country. Tabanids are known as biological and mechanical vectors of viruses, such as equine infectious anemia and hog cholera, bacteria such as Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Anaplasma marginale, protozoans such as Trypanosoma and Besnoitia and filarial nematodes [2]. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. and the diversity in the Tabanidae members collected in Lithuania.
Tabanids are known to mechanically transmit different trypanosomatids, such as Trypanosoma (Trypanozoon) evansi (Steel, 1885) Balbiani, 1888, the causal agent surra of camels, horses and other mammals. Tabanids are also known to mechanically transmit T. (Duttonella) vivax Ziemann, 1905 (South America) and T. (Trypanozoon) brucei Plimmer and Bradford, 1899 (parts of Africa) [2]. Tabanids are considered vectors of the Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri Laveran, 1902 species complex [3,4] with the species T. theileri. The pathogen can be transmitted by laying infected feces on the skin of the mammalian host or through ingestion of infected insects [5]. The T. theileri species complex consists of several species (T. theileri, T. melophagium, T. cervi, T. cf. cervi and T. trinaperronei) and various trypanosome genotypes and lineages reported from cervids, bovids and insects, but the exact taxonomy of these is not yet possible to determine [6,7,8]. The status of trypanosomatid species remains unclear, as it does for all organisms with predominantly clonal reproduction [9], and the taxonomy of the T. theileri species complex is still controversial. All trypanosomes of this group have unique T. theileri-like morphology and are the largest mammalian blood trypanosomes with small kinetoplasts. Based on their morphology, they were merged into the subgenus Megatrypanum and classified according to the hosts they infect as well. The most common hosts are domestic and wild ruminants [10]. The phylogeny based on the SSU rRNA of the T. theileri group showed a strongly supported and monophyletic clade [11] which, despite high similarity, was separated from other T. (Megatrypanum) trypanosomes (T. conorhini, T. legeri, T. minasense, T. pestanai and T. binneyi). Rodrigues et al. [11] indicated that the name T. (Megatrypanum) should only apply to members of the T. theileri clade and not to other species.
Megatrypanum, found in bovids and cervids, are transmitted by tabanid flies, whereas those infecting sheep and goats are transmitted by host-specific louse flies (Hippoboscidae). Interrupted feeding could be the most important factor determining the role of tabanids as effective mechanical vectors of various pathogens [12]. Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) are commonly found in the hindgut of tabanids but are absent from the salivary glands, meaning that the transmission occurs primarily through feces entering the bite wound or perhaps the ingestion of infected tabanids by the animal [5]. The high degree of host specificity, evidenced by genotypes exclusive to each ruminant species and the lack of a genotype shared by different host species, suggest that the evolutionary history of trypanosomes of this subgenus is strongly constrained by their ruminant hosts [11]. Recent phylogenetic studies segregated T. theileri in cattle and other ruminants worldwide into two major genetic lineages (the TthI and TthII clades) based on genetic markers [13,14].
Species of the T. theileri complex are distributed in many regions, but only few investigations confirmed their occurrence in tabanids. Trypanosomatid infections (T. theileri-like) in four species of female horseflies (Hyb. tarandina, Hyb. muehlfeldi, Hyb. bimaculata and Chrysops divaricatus) were detected in northwest Russia [15]. Detection of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) in Haematopota pluvialis, T. bromius, T. maculicornis and T. distinguendus was reported in Poland [16], and Hyb. ciureai and T. bromius have been found to be positive for T. theileri in the Czech Republic [6]. In one study, fifty-five percent of host-seeking Chrysops in North America were infected with trypanosomatid parasites [17]. The infective stages of T. theileri were identified using transmission experiments [5], and the development stages of two species of the T. theileri complex in tabanids were described [18].
Tabanids in Lithuania were not studied earlier for the presence of trypanosomatids. We collected tabanids from 2018 to 2019 at several sampling localities in Lithuania in order to find which species of trypanosomatids are present in the area and to determine their prevalence in tabanids of different species.
The objectives of this study were (1) to collect tabanids in different localities in Lithuania and to investigate them for the presence of Trypanosoma and (2) to examine the genetic diversity of the detected Trypanosoma sp. and to assess the relationships between the parasite lineages and tabanid host species. To address these questions, we evaluated the genetic diversity of Trypanosoma isolates from 14 different species of Tabanidae. The knowledge of pathogens, which can be detected in insects of particular species, would give new insights into insect feeding preferences as well as potential vector species and would allow better understanding of the transmission regularities of pathogens in the wild.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Tabanid Fly Collection and Identification

Tabanid specimens were collected with Nzi traps [19] in four localities in Lithuania—Azuolu Buda (N54.70761, E23.53323), Ilgakiemis (N54.76593, E23.83295), Poskaiciai (N54.89185, E25.42979), Sirvydai (N55.00955, E23.45876)—and with an entomological net in two additional localities—Papile (N56.17059, E22.78323) and Sviliai (N55.26670, E23.79309)—from June of 2018 to September of 2019.
Species identification was carried out using a taxonomic key [20] before processing. Morphological identification of flies with uncertain identification was confirmed using PCR. Fragments of the cytochrome oxidase I gene were amplified using universal primers LCO1490 and HCO2198. They were then sequenced, and the identities of the obtained sequences were checked using the “Basic Local Alignment Search Tool” (National Centre of Biotechnology Information website: http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST (accessed on 1 May 2024). The obtained sequences (accession numbers PP946791–P946795) matched the sequences from GenBank more than 99% of the time. Voucher specimens were deposited at Vilnius University’s Department of Zoology.

2.2. The Detection of Trypanosoma in Tabanid Flies Using PCR

The total DNA was extracted from each individual insect using a DNeasy Blood&Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A nested PCR protocol was applied to amplify a 748 bp-long DNA fragment encoding SSU rRNA using the outer primers Tryp763 and Tryp 1016 and the inner primers Tryp99 and Tryp957 [21]. All PCRs were performed in a total volume of 25 µL: 2 µL total genomic DNA template, 12.5 µL DreamTaq Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania, Vilnius), 8.5 µL nuclease-free water and 1 µL of each primer. The temperature profiles in all PCRs were the same, as provided by Sehgal et al. [21]. All amplifications were evaluated using electrophoresis. One positive control (Trypanosoma sp. infected insect, confirmed by sequence analysis) and one negative control (ultrapure water) were used during each amplification.

2.3. Sequence Analysis

The PCR-positive samples were purified and sequenced using a Big Dye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit and ABI PRISMTM 3100 capillary sequencing robot (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the Trypanosoma sequences were identified using the “Basic Local Alignment Search Tool” available from the NCBI. The sequences were submitted to GenBank (GenBank accession no. PP945809-PP945817). Other sequences for the Megatrypanum trypanosomes included in the phylogenetic analyses were obtained from GenBank (Table 1). The newly generated sequences were aligned with other Megatrypanum trypanosomes which belonged to the TthI and TthII clades of Trypanosoma theileri.
To clarify the intra-species relationships among the T. theileri species group, a phylogenetic median-joining (MJ) network [22] was created using Popart-1.7 software (http://popart.otago.ac.nz, accessed on 17 February 2023 [23]). This method, described in detail in [22], includes nodes to represent inferred sequences by iteratively adding “median” sequence vectors, and it combines the features of Kruskal’s algorithm. The MJ method begins with the minimum spanning trees, all combined within a single network while sequentially adding a few consensus sequences of three mutually close sequences at a time.
Table 1. List of species where trypanosomes were detected and sequence numbers from the GenBank database used in this study. Sequences in bold (GenBank accession nos. PP945809–PP945817) were determined in the present study. Numbers in network as shown in Figure 1.
Table 1. List of species where trypanosomes were detected and sequence numbers from the GenBank database used in this study. Sequences in bold (GenBank accession nos. PP945809–PP945817) were determined in the present study. Numbers in network as shown in Figure 1.
Number in Network (Haplotype)Species and Specimen IDNumber of Identical Trypanosoma spp. SequencesGenBank Accession No.Species According to Data in GenBank and References
1Haematopota pluvialis 1131PP945809
Haematopota subcylindrica 3101
Hybomitra distinquenda 2151
Hybomitra muehlfeldi 4251
Hybomitra nitidifrons 418, 4282
Tabanus bromius 458, 511, 5133
Tabanus maculicornis 512, 514, 519, 520, 524, 527, 5287
Coquillettidia richiardii1OM256570T. theileri II (complex II [6])
Cervus nippon1LC618030T. theileri II (complex II [13])
2Hybomitra muehlfeldi1OL855998T. theileri (complex II [18])
Hybomitra tarandina1MK156791T. theileri II (complex II [7])
Tabanus maculicornis 5231PP945810
3Odocoileus virginianus1JX178196Trypanosoma cf. cervi ([24])
Tabanus maculicornis 5321PP945811
4Hybomitra lurida 371PP945812
Hybomitra nitidifrons 420, 4262
Chrysops divaricatus1MK156793T. theileri I (complex I [15])
Glossina fuscipes fuscipes1KR024688T. theileri ([25])
Hybomitra muehlfeldi1MK156792T. theileri I (complex I [15])
5Hybomitra bimaculata 413, 4172PP945813
Hybomitra lapponica 4191
Tabanus maculicornis 4381
6Tabanus bromius 4561PP945814
Tabanus maculicornis 5261
7Hybomitra nitidifrons 4301PP945815
8Haematopota pluvialis 1381PP945816
9Tabanus maculicornis 5211PP945817
10Melophagus ovinus1HQ664912T. melophagium ([26])
11Odocoileus virginianus1MN752212T. trinaperronei ([7])

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Trypanosomatids in Tabanidae

In total, 101 Tabanidae members were investigated from six areas in Lithuania, and 14 different species were identified. Identification of some species (Hyb. muehlfeldi, Hyb. distinquenda, Hyb. bimaculata, Hyb. nitidifrons and T. bromius) was double-checked using both morphology and barcode sequencing. The most abundant species were T. maculicornis and Hyb. nitidifrons (Table 2).
In all, 30 newly determined partial SSU rRNA sequences (748 bp) of Trypanosoma spp. were obtained. The overall positivity of Trypanosoma spp. DNA in the tabanids was 50.5% (51/101) (Table 2), and the DNA of Trypanosoma spp. was detected in horseflies of 10 species out of the 14 investigated. Trypanosoma DNA was detected in 22 individual T. maculicornis specimens out of 26 (84.62%), and lower positivity was observed in Hyb. nitidifrons (14/18, 77.8%) and T. bromius (6/13, 46.2%). Although flies of other species, such as Haem. pluvialis and Haem. subcylindrica, were abundant, trypanosomatid DNA was detected only in a few of them (Table 2). Four horsefly species were represented by a single individual each (Hyb. distinquenda, Hyb. lapponica, Hyb. lurida and Hyb. muehlfeldi) and were positive for T. theileri. No trypanosomes were detected in flies belonging to the genus Chrysops (C. italicus, C. relictus and C. caecutiens) or Haem. crassicornis during this study, supposedly because of the low number of investigated flies for these species. To the best of our knowledge, the trypanosomatid detections in Hyb. lurida and Hyb. lapponica are the first ones ever recorded. Five samples from Hyb. nitidifrons and one from T. maculicornis, positive for Trypanosoma spp., carried a mix of either two or more different trypanosomatid haplotypes showing double peaks in the chromatograms of their sequences.

3.2. Haplotype Network Analysis

A phylogenetic median-joining (MJ) network was inferred from 30 newly determined partial SSU rRNA sequences and 8 already-published sequences (Table 1). Sixteen sequences which were isolated from seven tabanid species (seven sequences from T. maculicornis, three from T. bromius, two from Hyb. nitidifrons and one from each specimen of Haem. pluvialis, Hyb. distinquenda, Haem. subcylindrica and Hyb. muehlfeldi) showed 100% identity of the cervid T. theileri (GenBank accession no. LC618030, YMG-11) isolated from Cervus nippon and Trypanosoma sp. isolated from Coquillettidia richiardii (Culicidae) (GenBank accession no. OM256570) (Figure 1, circle 1). These two sequences from GenBank belong to bovine T. theileri complex II [6,13]. One sequence from T. maculicornis had 100% similarity to the Trypanosoma sp. sequence isolated from the horsefly Hyb. tarandina from northwest Russia (GenBank accession no. MK156791.1, KrS11) [15,18] and from Hyb. muehlfeldi (GenBank accession no. OL855998) [18]. Both sequences belong to the T. theileri ThII clade (Figure 1, circle 2). A sequence from Haem. pluvialis was unique (Figure 1, circle 8), another was 99.9% similar to sequences belonging to TthII (Figure 1, circles 1 and 2), and one sequence from T. maculicornis (Figure 1, circle 9) was more closely related to T. melophagium (GenBank accession no. HQ664912) [26], a parasite of the sheep Melophagus ovinus, with a measured similarity of 99.73%. It was confirmed that T. melophagium is more related to the lineage of TthII, and these SSU rRNA sequences are highly conserved among Megatrypanum trypanosomes. The differences are only a few substitutions, despite the fact that T. melophagium is a different species and has different hosts. Several isolates of Trypanosoma from the hosts Hyb. lurida and Hyb. nitidifrons (Figure 1, circle 4) exhibited 100% similarity to the T. theileri isolate G24 from Glossina fuscipes fuscipes (Central African Republic, GenBank accession no. KR024688) [25] and from the horseflies Hyb. muehlfeldi (MK156792), Chrysops divaricatus (MK156793) in the Republic of Karelia [15]. Both isolates from these horseflies belong to the complex TthI. Several sequences of Trypanosoma isolated from T. maculicornis were identical to those referred to as T. cf. cervi (GenBank accession no. JX178196) from Odocoileus virginianus (USA) (Figure 1, circle 3). These isolates occurred between two T. theileri complexes in the network (Figure 1) as well as an isolate from the same white-tailed deer, named as a separate species (T. (Megatrypanum) trinaperronei).
Insects 15 00581 g001
Figure 1. Median-joining network of Trypanosoma spp. found in insects (tabanids, culicids and Glossina fuscipes fuscipes), T. trinaperronei found in white-tailed deer and T. melophagium inferred using SSU rRNA (748 bp) sequences and median-joining network method for intraspecific phylogenies. Network demonstrates evidence of TthI (circle 4) and TthII (circles 1 and 2) phylogenetic lineages, where most sequences belong. Numbers in circles correspond to those in Table 1.
Figure 1. Median-joining network of Trypanosoma spp. found in insects (tabanids, culicids and Glossina fuscipes fuscipes), T. trinaperronei found in white-tailed deer and T. melophagium inferred using SSU rRNA (748 bp) sequences and median-joining network method for intraspecific phylogenies. Network demonstrates evidence of TthI (circle 4) and TthII (circles 1 and 2) phylogenetic lineages, where most sequences belong. Numbers in circles correspond to those in Table 1.
Insects 15 00581 g001

4. Discussion

Species of the T. (Megatrypanum) theileri group putatively are non-pathogenic mammalian parasites and are transferred by an infected vector. Böse et al. [5] experimentally proved that the transmission of T. theileri in the field usually takes place through contamination of the oral mucosa with metacyclic stages from the gut contents or feces of tabanids. Kostygov et al. [18] studied the development of two different species of the T. theileri complex in the intestine of the vector and concluded that the observed differences were associated with the species of the vector and not with the phylogenetic position of the parasites. Ganyukova et al. [15] studied four species of infected horseflies and detected four morphotypes of T. theileri-like trypanosomes in the hindgut. PCR-based methods are used for detection of these parasites in bloodsucking insects, and Werszko et al. [16] detected Megatrypanum trypanosomes in Haem. pluvialis, T. bromius, T. maculicornis and T. distinguendus in Poland by molecular means, with the overall positivity of Trypanosoma spp. being 33.68%. Trypanosoma theileri was detected in the tabanids of two species (Hyb. ciureai and T. bromius) as well as in other bloodsucking Diptera (mosquitoes and sandflies) in the Czech Republic [6], and the prevalence of T. theileri in tabanids was reported to be 44%. In Lithuania, only Trypanosoma in raptor birds and biting midges have been investigated thus far [27,28], and the subgenus Megatrypanum in mammals or tabanids has not been studied yet.
Our study focused on the molecular detection of trypanosomatids in Tabanidae, and we examined a wider range of species and more individuals than in previous studies [6,15,16]. In flies of some species (Hyb. lapponica and Hyb. lurida), Trypanosoma was detected for the first time. T. maculicornis was the most abundant species, and this tabanid also yielded the highest prevalence of trypanosomatids (84.62%). Similarly, high prevalence for Trypanosoma spp. was detected for this species in Poland (60%) [16]. Hyb. nitidifrons showed 77.8% prevalence of T. theileri and confirmed the results of a previous study on the development of T. theileri in this species of tabanids [18]. Our findings suggest that T. maculicornis and Hyb.nitidifrons could be effective vectors of T. theileri. Some species of tabanids, such as T. bromius, have been previously confirmed as vectors of T. theileri [5], where 14% of tabanids were positive for trypanosomatids. A high prevalence in T. bromius (46.2%) was detected during our study as well as in a study by Brotánková et al. (50%) [6], but this species was not as prevalent (17.95%) for trypanosomatids in Poland [16]. Some abundant tabanid species from our study (Haem. pluvialis and Haem. subcylindrica) demonstrated low prevalence of T. theileri, which is quite surprising because Haem. pluvialis showed the highest infection rate (57.14%) in a study carried out in Poland [16].
Five SSU rRNA sequences of Trypanosoma spp. obtained from Hyb. nitidifrons and one from T. maculicornis demonstrated double peaks in their chromatograms, suggesting mixed trypanosomatid infections in the same insect. No infections of Trypanosoma spp. were detected in the Chrysops flies during our investigation, while the presence of T. theileri-like trypanosomatids was reported in these flies in earlier works [5,15]. This observation suggests that larger tabanids such as Tabanus or Hybomitra transfer more secretion to another host during feeding, possibly influencing the amount of infection of different strains or species of Trypanosoma spp., while smaller tabanids, like Chrysops, transfer fewer secretions to another host during feeding [12], making these tabanids less important in pathogen transmission.
There is no information concerning the occurrence of T. theileri parasites in wild animals in Lithuania, but data available on Polish cervids [29] show the presence of trypanosomes in red deer (Cervus elaphus), suggesting that trypanosomes can be found in cervids in Lithuania as well.
Trypanosoma sequences from tabanids obtained in the present study showed low genetic polymorphism, and similar to previous studies [11], we detected homogeneity in the T. theileri trypanosomes as well. Despite the fact that Schoener et al. [8] reported T. theileri as a complex of species that cannot be resolved using the SSU gene, nine different haplotypes distributed in different tabanid species were detected by us (Table 1 and Table 2). It is known that the T. theileri group consists of several species (T. theileri, T. melophagium, T. cervi and T. trinaperronei) [6].
Analysis showed that most sequences obtained during our study were identical or quite close to two major T. theileri clades: TthI and TthII (Figure 1, circles 1, 2 and 4). The majority of the sequences were included in the TthII clade (Figure 1 and Table 1) along with a sequence from cervids [13], despite the fact that some authors [7,24] think that complex TthII is genetically closer to bovine tryposomatids and TthI is closer to cervids. The sequence of T. melophagium from Croatia (Figure 1, circle 10) was more related to the lineage TthII, as was confirmed by Martinković et al. [26]. The clade TthI contains sequences obtained only from tabanids (Figure 1, network number 4), with only one sequence from Glossina fuscipes fuscipes [25]. Some sequences from T. maculicornis, T. bromius, Hyb. bimaculata and Hyb. lapponica differed from the sequences available in GenBank and appeared to be closer to the TthI lineage, showing that this group can vary more genetically.
Two different clusters in the constructed network (Figure 1) can be observed. It is worth pointing out that most of the obtained sequences were clustered with other genotypes of two T. theileri clades. One sequence from T. maculicornis and two isolates from white-tailed deer, described as T. trinaperronei n.sp. [7] and T. cf. cervi, clustered between complexes TthI and TthII, indicating similarity to both clades (Figure 1, circles 3 and 11). Similar results, where the lineage from the deer was recognized as a separate lineage, were demonstrated by Rodrigues et al. [11]. Our network showed close relationships for the trypanosomes of the subgenus Megatrypanum and small polymorphism between the lineages.
Confirming previous studies [30], our data analysis suggests the presence of different Trypanosoma genotypes in the same tabanid species, meaning that different lineages of Trypanosoma could be more related to the vertebrate hosts but not the tabanid species. Trypanosoma spp. spread among hosts through tabanids, which feed on blood from a range of species, and thus the existence of several defined genotypes in the same species is probable. The sequences from T. maculicornis had six different haplotypes (Table 2), and any degree of host specificity was not found. This tabanid species is abundant and is infected by trypanosomatids more often (84.6%) than other tabanid species.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on Trypanosoma genetic diversity in Tabanidae from Lithuania. Although widespread, the T. theileri group is largely neglected due to its low economic importance and causing no pathology. However, pathologies might have resulted from coinfections or stress when fever, anorexia, and anemia were reported as symptoms in several bovid infections [31,32].

5. Conclusions

The present study reported on the molecular detection and genetic diversity of trypanosomes in 10 species of tabanids, with two of them being reported for the first time. The findings suggest that different strains of the T. theileri complex are not related to different tabanid species but rather to different host species. Further research is needed to shed light on the genetic diversity and vector-parasite specificity of the T. theileri species complex in different tabanid species based on partial cathepsin L-like protein (CATL) gene, ITS and Tth625 fragment sequences.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, data curation, writing—review and editing and funding acquisition, J.T., R.B. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.T.; visualization, A.P.; project administration, J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Food and Veterinary Service of the Republic of Lithuania under grant agreements MT18-4 and MT19-3.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Renatas Nedzinskas, Giedrė Rindzevičienė, Gintautas Repčys and Irena for their kind assistance with the trapping. We are thankful to student Diana Sinkevičiūtė for helping in the lab. We thank the anonymous reviewers for providing critical comments and suggestions to improve this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pakalniškis, S.; Bernotienė, R.; Lutovinovas, E.; Petrašiūnas, A.; Podėnas, S.; Rimšaitė, J.; Saether, O.A.; Spungis, V. Checklist of Lithuanian Diptera. New Rare Lith. Insect Species 2006, 18, 16–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mullens, B.A. Horse Flies and Deer Flies (Tabanidae). In Medical and Veterinary Entomology; Mullen, G.R., Durden, L.A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 327–343. ISBN 978-0-12-814043-7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Foil, L.D. Tabanids as Vectors of Disease Agents. Parasitol. Today 1989, 5, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Böse, R.; Petersen, K.; Pospichal, H.; Buchanan, N.; Tait, A. Characterization of Megatrypanum Trypanosomes from European Cervidae. Parasitology 1993, 107, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Böse, R.; Friedhoff, K.T.; Olbrich, S.; Büscher, G.; Domeyer, I. Transmission of Trypanosoma theileri to Cattle by Tabanidae. Parasitol. Res. 1987, 73, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Brotánková, A.; Fialová, M.; Čepička, I.; Brzoňová, J.; Svobodová, M. Trypanosomes of the Trypanosoma theileri Group: Phylogeny and New Potential Vectors. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Garcia, H.A.; Blanco, P.A.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Rodrigues, C.M.F.; Takata, C.S.A.; Campaner, M.; Camargo, E.P.; Teixeira, M.M.G. Pan-American Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) trinaperronei n. Sp. in the White-Tailed Deer Odocoileus virginianus Zimmermann and Its Deer Ked Lipoptena mazamae Rondani, 1878: Morphological, Developmental and Phylogeographical Characterisation. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schoener, E.; Uebleis, S.S.; Cuk, C.; Nawratil, M.; Obwaller, A.G.; Zechmeister, T.; Lebl, K.; Rádrová, J.; Zittra, C.; Votýpka, J.; et al. Trypanosomatid Parasites in Austrian Mosquitoes. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Maslov, D.A.; Votýpka, J.; Yurchenko, V.; Lukeš, J. Diversity and Phylogeny of Insect Trypanosomatids: All That Is Hidden Shall Be Revealed. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hoare, C.A. The Trypanosomes of Mammals. A Zoological Monograph; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodrigues, A.C.; Paiva, F.; Campaner, M.; Stevens, J.R.; Noyes, H.A.; Teixeira, M.M.G. Phylogeny of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri and Related Trypanosomes Reveals Lineages of Isolates Associated with Artiodactyl Hosts Diverging on SSU and ITS Ribosomal Sequences. Parasitology 2006, 132, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baldacchino, F.; Desquesnes, M.; Mihok, S.; Foil, L.D.; Duvallet, G.; Jittapalapong, S. Tabanids: Neglected Subjects of Research, but Important Vectors of Disease Agents! Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 28, 596–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rosyadi, I.; Setsuda, A.; Eliakunda, M.; Takano, A.; Maeda, K.; Saito-Ito, A.; Suzuki, K.; Sato, H. Genetic Diversity of Cervid Trypanosoma theileri in Honshu Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) in Japan. Parasitology 2021, 148, 1636–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Suganuma, K.; Kondoh, D.; Sivakumar, T.; Mizushima, D.; Elata, A.T.M.; Thekisoe, O.M.M.; Yokoyama, N.; Inoue, N. Molecular Characterization of a New Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri Isolate Supports the Two Main Phylogenetic Lineages of This Species in Japanese Cattle. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1927–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ganyukova, A.I.; Zolotarev, A.V.; Malysheva, M.N.; Frolov, A.O. First Record of Trypanosoma theileri-like Flagellates in Horseflies from Northwest Russia. Protistology 2018, 12, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Werszko, J.; Szewczyk, T.; Steiner-Bogdaszewska, Ż.; Wróblewski, P.; Karbowiak, G.; Laskowski, Z. Molecular Detection of Megatrypanum Trypanosomes in Tabanid Flies. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2020, 34, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Reeves, W.K. Host-Seeking Behavior of Selected Chrysops Species (Diptera: Tabanidae) Harboring Trypanosomatidae (Kinetoplastida). J. Insect Behav. 2006, 19, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kostygov, A.Y.; Frolov, A.O.; Malysheva, M.N.; Ganyukova, A.I.; Drachko, D.; Yurchenko, V.; Agasoi, V. V Development of Two Species of the Trypanosoma theileri Complex in Tabanids. Parasit. Vectors 2022, 15, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mihok, S. The Development of a Multipurpose Trap (the Nzi) for Tsetse and Other Biting Flies. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2002, 92, 385–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Falck, M. The Horse Flies (Diptera, Tabanidae) of Norway. Nor. J. Entomol. 2014, 61, 219–264. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sehgal, R.N.M.; Iezhova, T.A.; Marzec, T.; Valkiūnas, G. Trypanosoma naviformis Sp. Nov. (Kinetoplastidae: Trypanosomatidae) from Widespread African Songbirds, the Olive Sunbird (Cyanomitra olivacea) and Yellow-Whiskered Greenbul (Andropadus latirostris). Zootaxa 2015, 4034, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bandelt, H.J.; Forster, P.; Röhl, A. Median-Joining Networks for Inferring Intraspecific Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. Popart: Full-Feature Software for Haplotype Network Construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fisher, A.C.; Schuster, G.; Cobb, W.J.; James, A.M.; Cooper, S.M.; Peréz de León, A.A.; Holman, P.J. Molecular Characterization of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) Spp. Infecting Cattle (Bos taurus), White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and Elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) in the United States. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 197, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Votýpka, J.; Rádrová, J.; Skalický, T.; Jirků, M.; Jirsová, D.; Mihalca, A.D.; D’Amico, G.; Petrželková, K.J.; Modrý, D.; Lukeš, J. A Tsetse and Tabanid Fly Survey of African Great Apes Habitats Reveals the Presence of a Novel Trypanosome Lineage but the Absence of Trypanosoma brucei. Int. J. Parasitol. 2015, 45, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Martinković, F.; Matanović, K.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Garcia, H.A.; Teixeira, M.M.G. Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) Melophagium in the Sheep Ked Melophagus ovinus from Organic Farms in Croatia: Phylogenetic Inferences Support Restriction to Sheep and Sheep Keds and Close Relationship with Trypanosomes from Other Ruminant Species. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2012, 59, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bernotienė, R.; Iezhova, T.A.; Bukauskaitė, D.; Chagas, C.R.F.; Kazak, M.; Valkiūnas, G. Development of Trypanosoma everetti in Culicoides Biting Midges. Acta Trop. 2020, 210, 105555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kazak, M.; Bernotienė, R.; Treinys, R.; Bukauskaitė, D. Trypanosomatids in Bloodsucking Diptera Insects (Ceratopogonidae and Simuliidae) Wild-Caught at Raptor Bird Nests in Temperate Forests. Diversity 2023, 15, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wita, I.; Kingston, N. Trypanosoma Cervi in Red Deer, Cervus Elaphus, in Poland. Acta Parasitol. 1999, 44, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodrigues, A.C.; Garcia, H.A.; Ortiz, P.A.; Cortez, A.P.; Martinkovic, F.; Paiva, F.; Batista, J.S.; Minervino, A.H.; Campaner, M.; Pral, E.M.; et al. Cysteine Proteases of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri: Cathepsin L-like Gene Sequences as Targets for Phylogenetic Analysis, Genotyping Diagnosis. Parasitol. Int. 2010, 59, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Doherty, M.L.; Windle, H.; Voorheis, H.P.; Larkin, H.; Casey, M.; Clery, D.; Murray, M. Clinical Disease Associated with Trypanosoma theileri Infection in a Calf in Ireland. Vet. Rec. 1993, 132, 653–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Braun, U.; Rogg, E.; Walser, M.; Nehrbass, D.; Guscetti, F.; Mathis, A.; Deplazes, P. Trypanosoma theileri in the Cerebrospinal Fluid and Brain of a Heifer with Suppurative Meningoencephalitis. Vet. Rec. 2002, 150, 18–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 2. Prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. in Tabanidae of different species. * There are 9 haplotypes in total, as different tabanid species have the same haplotypes.
Table 2. Prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. in Tabanidae of different species. * There are 9 haplotypes in total, as different tabanid species have the same haplotypes.
SpeciesNo. of Positive Isolates (All Isolates)No. of Trypanosoma spp. Sequences (Number of Haplotypes) from Isolates
Chrysops caecutiens0 (1)
Chrysops italicus0 (1)
Chrysops relictus0 (3)
Haematopota crassicornis0 (1)
Haematopota pluvialis2 (17)2 (2)
Haematopota subcylindrica1 (14)1 (1)
Hybomitra bimaculata2 (3)2 (1)
Hybomitra distinquenda1 (1)1 (1)
Hybomitra lapponica1 (1)1 (1)
Hybomitra lurida1 (1)1(1)
Hybomitra muehlfeldi1 (1)1 (1)
Hybomitra nitidifrons14 (18)5 (3)
Tabanus bromius6 (13)4 (2)
Tabanus maculicornis22 (26)12 (6)
Total51 (101)30 (9) *
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Turčinavičienė, J.; Bernotienė, R.; Petrašiūnas, A. Molecular Detection and Analysis of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) spp. Diversity in Tabanidae (Diptera) Collected in Lithuania. Insects 2024, 15, 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080581

AMA Style

Turčinavičienė J, Bernotienė R, Petrašiūnas A. Molecular Detection and Analysis of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) spp. Diversity in Tabanidae (Diptera) Collected in Lithuania. Insects. 2024; 15(8):581. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080581

Chicago/Turabian Style

Turčinavičienė, Jurga, Rasa Bernotienė, and Andrius Petrašiūnas. 2024. "Molecular Detection and Analysis of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) spp. Diversity in Tabanidae (Diptera) Collected in Lithuania" Insects 15, no. 8: 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080581

APA Style

Turčinavičienė, J., Bernotienė, R., & Petrašiūnas, A. (2024). Molecular Detection and Analysis of Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) spp. Diversity in Tabanidae (Diptera) Collected in Lithuania. Insects, 15(8), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080581

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop