Next Article in Journal
Development of Tools to Understand the Relationship between Good Management Practices and Nest Losses in Meliponiculture: A Pilot Study in Latin American Countries
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitigating the Threat of Invasive Mosquito Species Expansion: A Comprehensive Entomological Surveillance Study on Kastellorizo, a Remote Greek Island
Previous Article in Journal
Influences of Salt Stress on Cotton Metabolism and Its Consequential Effects on the Development and Fecundity of Aphis gossypii Glover
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leaf and Flower Extracts from the Dwarf Elder (Sambucus ebulus): Toxicity and Repellence against Cosmopolitan Mosquito-Borne Diseases Vectors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Larvicidal and Pupicidal Toxicity and the Morphological Impact of the Dengue Vector (Aedes aegypti) Induced by Geranial and trans-Cinnamaldehyde

by
Sirawut Sittichok
1,
Hataichanok Passara
1,
Jirisuda Sinthusiri
2,
Tanapoom Moungthipmalai
3,
Cheepchanok Puwanard
3,
Kouhei Murata
4 and
Mayura Soonwera
1,*
1
Office of Administrative Interdisciplinary Program on Agricultural Technology, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
2
Community Public Health Program, Faculty of Public and Environmental Health, Huachiew Chalermprakiet University, Bang Phli, Samut Prakan Province 10540, Thailand
3
Department of Plant Production Technology, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
4
School of Agriculture, Tokai University, Kumamoto 862-8652, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(9), 714; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090714
Submission received: 30 August 2024 / Revised: 17 September 2024 / Accepted: 17 September 2024 / Published: 18 September 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Organic insecticides against Aedes aegypti L. mosquitoes are regarded as one of the most important tools for containing arboviruses transmitted by this species, such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya in tropical countries including Thailand, considering the development of mosquito resistance to synthetic chemical larvicides. The most critical way to contain outbreaks is to control the vector that transmits pathogens. Monoterpenes are new, effective, and eco-friendly alternatives. This study investigated the larvicidal and pupicidal activities of two monoterpenes—geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde—and their combinations. The efficacies of each formulation were compared against each other and temephos. Binary mixtures were significantly more effective than single formulations or temephos. They are safe for the non-target aquatic predator, guppies (Poecilia reticulata). These combinations make excellent insecticides for both larvae and pupae mosquito vector control, and the results open up the opportunity for both compounds to be developed into eco-friendly products.

Abstract

Monoterpenes are effective and eco-friendly alternatives to conventional chemical larvicides. We tested single and binary mixtures of monoterpenes—geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde—for their larvicidal and pupicidal activities against Aedes aegypti L. and for non-target toxicity on guppies (Poecilia reticulata Peters), using 1% (w/w) temephos as a reference. Geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde at 250 ppm showed stronger larvicidal and pupicidal activities with a 100% mortality rate and an LT50 ranging from 0.3 to 0.6 h. All combinations were strongly synergistic against larvae and pupae compared to single formulations, with an increased mortality value (IMV) of 6% to 93%. The combination of geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) at 200 ppm showed the highest impact, with an IMV of 93%. The strongest larvicidal and pupicidal activities, a 100% mortality rate, and an LT50 of 0.2 h were achieved by geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) 500 ppm. They were thirty times more effective than a 1% temephos solution (LT50 ranging from 6.7 to 96 h) and caused obviously shriveled cuticles and a swollen respiratory system. All single and binary mixtures were not toxic to the guppies. Thus, the combination of geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde has great potential as a safe insecticide for controlling mosquito larvae and pupae.

1. Introduction

The dengue (DENV), Zika (ZIKV), and chikungunya (CHIKV) viruses are diseases that share the same main vector—the Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquito [1]. Dengue is the most serious disease, leading to high morbidity and mortality in many parts of the world, including Thailand [2,3]. In 2023, Thailand presented the highest levels of DENV cases: ~17 thousand people were infected [3]. In the same vein, CHIKV spread nationwide and ~15 thousand confirmed cases were reported between 2018 and 2019 [4]. Regarding ZIKV disease, in 2019, a ZIKV outbreak in Thailand had a high impact on the public health system since it was closely related to newborn microcephaly and Guillain–Barré syndrome [5]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that the annual economic loss due to mosquito-borne diseases was more than USD 10 billion [6], and ~USD 10 million in Thailand [7].
The main tactic for regulating mosquito populations is to deal with the insects while they are in the larvae and pupae stages [8]. Therefore, applying synthetic insecticides is the first and most common way to control mosquito larvae, pupae, or adults [9]. Temephos, a synthetic insecticide, is widely used for controlling larvae [10]. Unfortunately, temephos, apart from the high cost, was found to be highly toxic to the human nervous system and non-target species; further, mosquitoes have developed resistance to it [8,9,10]. Hence, one approach to this problem is to develop innovative insecticides based on essential oils (EOs), as secondary metabolites, which are characterized by strong bioactivity, because of synergism and multiple modes of action. Further, they are biodegradable and safe for humans and other aquatic species [8,11].
Monoterpenes were plant-produced secondary metabolites characterized by their volatility and fragrance. The monoterpenes represent about 90% of the essential oils and are the main ones responsible for insecticidal, larvicidal, and repellent activities [11,12]. Geranial, a monoterpenoid aldehyde, found abundantly in lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) [13], has shown insecticidal activity under laboratory conditions as a contact toxicant against Ae. aegypti eggs [8] and larvae [14], cabbage looper larvae (Trichoplusia ni) [15], and as a topical toxicant for housefly larvae and pupae (Musca domestica) [16] as a contact toxicant for housefly adults [17]. Trans-cinnamaldehyde, a monoterpenoid aldehyde extracted from cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) [18], was found to be a contact toxicant for the larvae of Anopheles gambiae [12] and Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus [19], and Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus adults [20], and had a strong repellent effect against adult female Ae. aegypti when sprayed [21].
In addition, several researchers reported that combinations of monoterpenes exhibited a higher degree of toxicity against mosquitoes and other insects than single monoterpene components (Table 1).
Furthermore, several combinations of monoterpenes showed high toxicity against several target species (Ae. aegypti, Ae. Albopictus, and M. domestica). Still, they were non-toxic to the tested other species (molly: Poecilia latipinna, guppy: Poecilia reticulata, zebrafish: Danio rerio, dwarf honeybee: Apis florea, yellow mealworm beetle: Tenebrio molitor, and a predatory bug: Podisus nigrispinus) [8,28,29,30,31]. Accordingly, investigations into insecticidal activities of geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde against larvae and pupae of Ae. aegypti are required to better understand the complexity of their active mechanisms and enable effective management and control of these vectors.
Here, we investigated the insecticidal activity against Ae. aegypti larvae and pupae of several single and binary formulations of monoterpenes—geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde. These two monoterpenes were chosen because they are generally known to be harmless for both humans and the environment with lower lethal dose (LD50) and lethal concentration (LC50) [32,33,34] and have insecticidal, antibacterial, and therapeutic properties [13,18]. The synergistic insecticidal effects and biosafety of the combinations against a common aquatic predator, guppy (P. reticulata), were evaluated. Guppy predators are widespread throughout Asia, including Thailand, and are an important part of the ecology [8,28]. The single and binary formulation morphological effects in mosquito larvae and pupae were observed using ultra-structural changes under scanning electron micrography (SEM). Reported insecticidal activity showed that they are a safe and sustainable alternative for managing mosquito populations in general and lowering breeding populations that merit more fieldwork [11,22,28].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mosquito Breeding

Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were originally from the Department of Entomology, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Ratchatewi, Bangkok, Thailand. They were bred in the Laboratory of Entomology at the School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL), Bangkok, Thailand, at 26.5 ± 2.0 °C, 75.5 ± 2.0% RH, and alternating 12 h light and dark periods. The hatched larvae were fed with special fish food pellets (Sakura® gold, 35% high protein content: TSDP (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Samut Sakhon, Thailand). Larvicidal and pupicidal assays were used in the 4th larvae stage and 2-day-old pupae.

2.2. Chemicals

Geranial 96% (CAS-No: 5392-40-5, the major compound of lemongrass oil) and trans-cinnamaldehyde 98% (CAS-No: 104-55-2, the major compound of cinnamon oil) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd. (Saint Louis, MO, USA). The 70% (v/v) stock solutions in ethanol were from T.S. Interlab Company Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand. Temephos (Sai GPO 1®, The Government Pharmaceutical Organization, Pathumthani, Thailand) was prepared at 1% (w/w), the concentration suggested by the World Health Organization for larval mosquitoes [35].

2.3. Treatment Formulations

The solvent for diluting the EO constituents was 70% (v/v) ethanol. The tested single formulations were geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde at 50, 150, and 250 ppm each. The tested binary mixtures were trans-cinnamaldehyde + geranial (1:1) at 50, 200, 300, and 500 ppm. At these concentrations, the single compounds were shown to have insecticidal, ovicidal, and repellent effects against mosquitoes and houseflies [8,17,26,28]. The positive controls were 1% temephos at 1, 5, and 10 ppm.

2.4. Larvicidal and Pupicidal Assay

A dipping bioassay [36,37] was used to evaluate the larvicidal and pupicidal activities against Ae. aegypti under controlled laboratory conditions. Initially, the larvae were not fed with any nourishment. Ten 4th instar larvae or pupae of Ae. aegypti were put in a beaker containing each treatment: 1 mL of each essential oil formulation in 99 mL distilled water. Not being able to move to the surface and disturbing the water or not diving was the definitive indication that the larvae and pupae were dead. Larval mortality was monitored at 5, 15, and 30 min and 1, 6, and 24 h, while pupal mortality was monitored at 5, 15, and 30 min and 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h. The positive control, 1% temephos, was tested concurrently. Mortality rates of larvae and pupae (%M) were computed from the following [22]:
Mortality rate (%M) = MT/TN × 100
where MT is the total number of dead larvae or pupae mosquito; and TN is the total number of treated larvae or pupae mosquito.
Mortality index (MI) was determined from the following [37]:
MI = %MTtreat/%MTtemephos
where %MTtreat is the %mortality of the tested formulations at 24 h for larvae or at 72 h for pupae, and %MTtemephos is the %mortality of the 1% temephos at 10 ppm at 24 h for the larvae or 72 h for the pupae.
MI described the relative toxicity, with MI > 1 signifying that the treatment was more toxic to larvae or pupae than the temephos at 10 ppm in the control.
The increased mortality value (IMV) was the increased efficacy in larvicidal and pupicidal activities of binary mixtures versus single formulations. IMV was calculated from the following [20]:
IMV = [%MTmix − %MTsing/%MImix] × 100
where %MTmix is the %mortality of the binary mixture at 24 h for larvae or 72 h for pupae, and %MTsing is the %mortality of the single formulations at 24 for larvae or 72 h for pupae.
The synergistic mortality index (SMI) was the higher efficacy of binary mixtures over a single formulation at the same strength. SMI was calculated using the following [22]:
SMI = LT50 mix/LT50 sing
where LT50 mix is the LT50 (50% lethal time) of the binary mixture and LT50 sing is the LT50 of the single formulations.
Again, SMI indicates relative synergy, with SMI < 1 signifying that there is a synergistic effect, whereas SMI ≥ 1 indicates no synergy.

2.5. Microscopic and SEM Analysis of Morphological Changes

After the larvicidal and pupicidal bioassay, the morphological alterations and the external and internal changes in the treated larvae and pupae were observed by SEM at the Scientific and Technological Research Equipment, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand [8].
SEM micrographs were captured at different magnifications in different body regions to view the external ultra-structural changes following treatment compared to untreated controls. After 24 or 72 h of treatment, samples were prepared in a fixative, 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 30 min in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, then thoroughly washed with the same buffer; then, the larvae and pupae were dehydrated by soaking in a series of ethanol solutions in water (30, 50, 70, and 95%). Each 1 h soaking with the ethanol solution was replicated three times with an automatic tissue processor. Then, the larvae and pupae were dried with a CO2 critical point drier. Each dehydrated sample was mounted on a stub coated with gold–palladium and examined by SEM (JEOL JSM-6610LV, Tokyo, Japan).

2.6. Safety Bioassay of Non-Target Aquatic Predator

Guppy (P. reticulata) predators were purchased from an organic farm (Molly Fish Farm Thailand, Nakhon Chai Si District, Nakhon Pathom Province, Thailand (13.81556 °N, 100.03722 °E)). The toxicity of the tested formulations was tested against guppies, following Moungthipmalai et al. [8] and Selvi et al. [38]. One hundred fish were kept in a plastic container (400 × 600 × 300 mm) containing 60.0 L of clean water at 30 ± 2 °C and 74 ± 2% RH, with 12 h light and 12 h dark periods. The concentration of each treatment was 10,000 ppm following Soonwera et al. [28]. Ten adult male guppies were put in a plastic container (350 mm diameter, 180 mm height) containing 5 L of clean water. Each tested formulation was applied at 10,000 ppm. Temephos (1%) was tested concurrently. The mortality rate and abnormal behavior were recorded for 10 days post-treatment. Mortality rates (%MR) were computed from the following [37]:
Mortality rate (%MR) = C/D × 100
where C is the number of dead guppies and D is the number of treated guppies.
The biosafety index (BI) was determined using the following formula [28]:
BI = %MTnon-target/%MTtarget
where %MTnon-target is the %mortality of non-target aquatic predators, and %MTtarget is the %mortality of target species.
BI > 0.90 implies that the tested formulation was less safe than temephos for the aquatic predator, whereas BI < 0.90 implies that the formulation was safer than temephos.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

IBM’s SPSS Statistical Software Package version 28 (Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. All bioassays used a completely randomized design (CRD), and each treatment was replicated five times. The mean mortality rate for the larvicidal and pupicidal assay and the mean mortality rate for the non-target bioassay were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s test was used to investigate the differences across multiple treatment groups [39]. All statistical tests used the conventional p < 0.05 criterion. The time that a substance took to 50% mortality (LT50) against larvae and pupae was determined by probit analysis of mortality (number of larvae and pupae that had died at 24 and 72 h after exposure). Simple regression assessed the larvicidal and pupicidal efficacy against Ae. aegypti using generalized linear models (GLMs) with a binomial distribution [40]. The correlation coefficient, R2, was used to determine acceptable linearity.

3. Results

3.1. Larvicidal and Pupicidal Activities

Figure 1 shows regressions for larvicidal activity versus exposure time of single and binary mixtures against Ae. aegypti. All regression lines showed R2 close to 1. Several single formulations were less effective than any binary mixture after 24 h exposure. Among the single formulations, both geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde at 250 ppm had more larvicidal activity (with a 100% mortality) than other formulations (with mortalities between 70% and 98%). All binary mixtures exhibited a strong larvicidal activity with 100% mortality, except geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) at 100 ppm (98% mortality). In contrast, 1% temephos had a mortality of only 96% at 1 ppm but 100% at 5 ppm or higher. In addition, for MI, both geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde at 250 ppm and all binary mixtures showed equal effectiveness with 1% temephos 10 ppm, with MI = 1. Other formulations were less effective than 1% temephos 10 ppm with 0.7 ≤ MI ≤ 0.9.
Linear regression analyses of the pupicidal activity versus exposure time of single and binary mixtures against Ae. aegypti are shown in Figure 2. All obtained regression lines were positively linear with R2 close to 1. Several single formulations were less effective than all binary mixtures at 72 h after exposure. The highest mortality rate among the single formulations was 100%, achieved by geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde at 250 ppm. The highest mortality for the binary mixtures was 100%, achieved by geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1, 500 ppm). On the other hand, 1% temephos had a mortality of only 4% at 1 ppm rising to 90% at 5 ppm. For MI, the strongest activity was geranial 250 ppm, trans-cinnamaldehyde 250 ppm, and geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) 500 ppm. This MI was 1.1 times higher than 1% temephos (10 ppm). Other formulations were less effective than this temephos concentration with 0.1 ≤ MI ≤ 0.9.
Figure 3 shows the effect of larvicidal and pupicidal activities against Ae. aegypti in terms of LT50 value. All binary mixtures provided high larvicidal and pupicidal activities against Ae. aegypti than single formulations. Among single formulations, geranial 250 ppm showed the highest larvicidal and pupicidal activities against Ae. aegypti while trans-cinnamaldehyde 250 ppm had an LT50 of 0.6 h. In particular, the combination of geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) 500 ppm exhibited stronger larvicidal and pupicidal activities against Ae. aegypti with a short LT50 of 0.2 h which is more effective than 1% temephos 10 ppm (an LT50 of 0.5 h).
Moreover, the larvicidal and pupicidal efficacy of all binary mixtures against Ae. aegypti exhibited more than the efficacy of single formulations, with a synergistic mortality index (SMI) of 0.1–0.6. The highest synergy against both larvae and pupae was achieved by geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) 200 ppm, with an SMI of 0.1 and 0.2 (see Figure 4).
Fractions of IMV of single and binary mixtures against both larvae and pupae of Ae. aegypti are shown in Figure 5. Three mixtures improved by 6–93% compared to single formulations, except a combination of geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) 500 ppm showed no improvement. The highest increased mortality was achieved by geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1, 200 ppm), with an IMV of between 22% and 93%.

3.2. Toxicity of Treatment on Morphological Changes

Larvae and pupae showed significant toxicity in response to varying treatment concentrations—see Figure 6 and Figure 7. Larvae and pupae treated with the binary mixture—geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde—showed a remarkable reduction in the growth rate about twice that of the compounds alone. The control larvae showed a smooth cuticle, siphon, and intact anal papillae (Figure 6A–D). On the other hand, treated larvae showed highly damaged heads, abdomens, and thoraxes (Figure 6E,F) and swollen anal papillae (Figure 6G) as well as shrunken cuticles surrounding the respiratory siphon (Figure 6H). In particular, the respiratory siphon that has an anterolateral spiracular lobe, posterolateral spiracular lobe, lateral perispiracular lobe, anterior perispiracular lobe, and terminal spiracles were damaged, showing a conspicuous narrowing in the treated larvae compared to the control group.
In Figure 7A–D, it was evident that the pupae in the control group had smooth cuticles on the head, cephalothorax, and abdomen. However, the treated pupae showed significant cell damage in these areas (Figure 7E), along with swollen breathing openings and respiratory trumpets (Figure 7F), and shriveled cuticles around the genital lobe paddle (Figure 7H). Furthermore, the openings of the filter apparatus and pinna of the respiratory trumpets changed in the treated pupae (Figure 7G).

3.3. Efficacy of Non-Target Predators

The toxicity of single and binary mixtures on the mortality of adult guppies after 10 days of exposure is shown in Figure 8. All tested formulations showed low toxicity to adults with a mortality ranging from 2% to 12%. In contrast, 1% temephos 1 ppm was highly toxic to the adults, with a 100% mortality.
The BI is shown in Figure 9. All formulations provided a low BI, from 0.02 to 0.80 < 0.9, signifying that all treatments were extremely safe.

4. Discussion

Our previous and other studies reported good insecticidal and ovicidal activities against Ae. aegypti and M. domestica of single and binary mixtures of geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde [8,16,17]. However, controlling the larvae and pupae should be the first line of defense against them [8]. Further, chemical insecticide use is associated with insecticide resistance, environmental damage, and public health risks [8,16,41]. Therefore, essential oils and their constituents represent an option for developing new agents due to their widely reported insecticidal activity [11,12,13,14,15]. It is significant that single and binary formulations of geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde showed great potential as alternative agents against the early life stages of these pests.
In this study, all formulations showed stronger synergistic activities against larvae and pupae of Ae. aegypti, with shorter LT50 and higher mortality rate, IMV, and SMI, especially the combination of geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) 200 ppm, when compared with those of single formulation [16,42,43]. These results were consistent with other studies showing strong synergies, as well as our previous study, which reported that the combination of geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1 at 10,000 ppm) showed a strong ovicidal activity against Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus [8]. Aungtikun et al. [17] found that a combination of (1:1) 1,8-cineole + geranial was strongly toxic to Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus adults. Soonwera et al. [26] concluded that a combination of geranial + trans-anethole was toxic to housefly adults. Similarly, benzyl benzoate + (E)-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) showed strong action against Haemaphysalis longicornis larvae [30], and Tak et al. [15] concluded that a 1:1 mixture of citral + limonene and citral + geranyl acetate exhibited strong activity against cabbage looper, T. ni.
Our MI showed that the combination of geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) 500 ppm was even more potent than temephos, a synthetic insecticide they intended to replace, and we concluded that Ae. aegypti larvae had developed resistance to temephos. We confirmed the findings of Soonwera et al. [37], who showed that 1% temephos was less effective in larvicidal and pupicidal activity than the tested essential oils. Similarly, Davila-Barboza et al. [44] reported that, in Mexico, Ae. aegypti larvae exhibited high resistance to temephos, with mortality ranging from 42% to 78% when exposed to 0.012 mg/L.
Micrographs showed extensive external morphological changes to larvae and pupae after treatment with all single and binary mixtures, similar to the work of Soonwera and Phasomkusolsil [43], who observed similar significant morphological changes and concluded that in larvae, after treatments with lemongrass oil, geranial was the major constituent. Also, Nakasen et al. [42] reported significant morphological larval changes in larvae Ae. aegypti induced by C. verum oil, of which trans-cinnamaldehyde was the major constituent. Gad [45] also observed major morphological changes in Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae after treatment with cinnamon oil (C. osmophloeum). Furthermore, Soonwera et al. [37] reported damage caused by d-limonene and trans-anethole and suggested their modes of action against Ae. aegypti were the same. Similar external changes were reported by Fujiwara et al. [46], caused by a combination of methyl cinnamate + linalool (1:4).
The insecticidal mechanism of action of geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde demonstrated its interaction with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and cytokinesis, indicating that monoterpene strongly interacted with both enzymes [20,22]. Both monoterpenes are toxic to Ae. aegypti larvae epithelial cells and respiratory siphons and pupae respiratory trumpet cuticles (see Figure 6 and Figure 7) [17,20]. Geranial is toxic to mosquitoes by inhibiting enzymes AChE. The acetylcholine esterase enzyme breaks down the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, which causes paralysis in the larvae and pupae and eventual mortality [17]. Trans-cinnamaldehyde caused mortality by inhibiting cytokinesis and reducing the ATPase activity of the cell membrane, causing decreased cell respiration and membrane integrity, and eventual mortality [20,47].
Monoterpenes are generally considered safe and eco-friendly for a wide range of other organisms, including aquatic predators, pollinators, and edible insects [8,28,29,30]. All tested formulations in this study were safe for adult guppies. Their BI was lower than 0.9 and the mortality was low. Moungthipmalai et al. [8] confirmed that geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde and their combination (1:1) at 10,000 ppm showed very low guppy toxicity (LC50 = 37,000, 8700, and 4000 ppm) and molly (P. latipinna) (LC50 = 48,000, 8100, and 4300 ppm) whereas temephos 1 ppm showed 290 ppm for guppy and 500 ppm for molly. Soonwera et al. [22] reported that geranial and a combination of geranial + trans-anethole (1:1) were less toxic for stingless bees (T. pegdeni) (LT50 = 30.7 and 21.3 h). In addition, Nwanade et al. [30] indicated that trans-cinnamaldehyde at an LC50 of 28 µL/mL was not toxic to the yellow mealworm beetle (T. molitor) with 0% mortality. Similarly, Alsalhi et al. [48] reported that trans-cinnamaldehyde was not toxic to western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis (LC50 = 3900 ppm), whereas temephos showed an LC50 = 4.8 ppm. On the other hand, 1% temephos was highly toxic to the guppy with a 100% mortality and BI = 1.0–1.09. Similarly, Moungthipmalai et al. [8] reported that temephos was highly toxic against guppy and molly with an LT50 of 300 and 500 ppm. Furthermore, temephos had highly dangerous neurotoxic side effects on humans with an acute oral LD50 > 2000 mg/kg for Wistar rats [10,49] and fish and aquatic organisms: western mosquitofish with an LC50 = 4.8 ppm, water beetle (Acilius sulcatus L.) with an LC50 = 1.1 ppm, and backswimmers (Anisops bouvieri) with an LC50 = 0.9 ppm [47]. In contrast, single and binary mixtures of geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde were safe and benign to the tested aquatic predators. They were also safe and non-toxic to humans and other mammals at an LC50 < 100 ppm [32] with an oral LD50 > 2000 mg/kg for mice (geranial) [33] and a dermal LD50 > 1200 mg/kg for rats, an LD50 > 1000 mg/kg for rabbits [34], an oral LD50 > 2200 mg/kg for guinea pigs, and an LD50 >3000 mg/kg for rats (trans-cinnamaldehyde) [34], as well as were used as food additives in Asia since ancient times [22,34].
Therefore, the binary mixtures were extremely toxic to the larvae and pupae, causing rapid destruction and preventing any further growth.

5. Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the combination of geranial + trans-cinnamaldehyde (1:1) acted in synergy and was more effective than temephos. Thus, it was suitable for developing further into a larvicidal and pupicidal agent for managing mosquito populations. The mixture showed very promising larvicidal and pupicidal efficacy (at 100–200 ppm). Further, sublethal concentrations reduced the fertility of Ae. aegypti, and was safe for non-target organisms, especially guppies. In addition, bio-efficacy trials on this combination and toxicity investigations on human cells in lab and field study settings are potential future research topics. In addition, the combinations should be formulated as an aqueous solution for controlling mosquito immature stages (eggs, larvae, and pupae).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and K.M.; methodology, T.M., C.P. and H.P.; data analysis, J.S., C.P. and S.S.; investigation, M.S., S.S. and H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and J.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S., S.S. and K.M.; funding acquisition, T.M. and H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL), Bangkok 10520, Thailand (KMITL) Doctoral Scholarship, grant number KDS 2021/002 and grant number KREF046703.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang Ethics Committee approved the bioassays in this study: KDS2021/002 and KREF046703 were the registration numbers.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL) for financial support. We thank John Morris, KMITL, for commenting on and reviewing the English of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

EOs: essential oils; MI, mortality index; IMV, increased mortality value; SMI, synergistic mortality index; SEM, scanning electron micrograph; BI, biosafety index.

References

  1. de Souza, L.M.; Venturini, F.P.; Inada, N.M.; Iermak, I.; Garbuio, M.; Mezzacappo, N.F.; de Oliveira, K.T.; Bagnato, V.S. Curcumin in formulations against Aedes aegypti: Mode of action, photolarvicidal and ovicidal activity. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2020, 31, 101840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Thailand Ministry of Public Health. Preventing Dengue through Eliminating Mosquito Breeding Sites. 2023. Available online: https://ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/publish/1449920230712042416.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2024).
  3. World Health Organization. Vector-Borne Diseases. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vector-borne-diseases (accessed on 10 June 2024).
  4. Khongwichit, S.; Chansaenroj, J.; Thongmee, T.; Benjamanukul, S.; Wanlapakorn, N.; Chirathaworn, C.; Poovorawan, Y. Large-scale outbreak of Chikungunya virus infection in Thailand, 2018–2019. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ruchusatsawat, K.; Wongjaroen, P.; Posanacharoen, A.; Rodriguez-Barraquer, I.; Sangkitporn, S.; Cummings, D.A.T.; Salje, H. Long-term circulation of Zika virus in Thailand: An observational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. World Health Organization. Global Vector Control Response 2017–2030. 2024. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259205 (accessed on 10 June 2024).
  7. Thisyakorn, U.; Saokaew, S.; Gallagher, E.; Kastner, R.; Sruamsiri, R.; Oliver, L.; Hanley, R. Epidemiology and costs of dengue in Thailand: A systematic literature review. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Moungthipmalai, T.; Puwanard, C.; Aungtikun, J.; Sittichok, S.; Soonwera, M. Ovicidal toxicity of plant essential oils and their major constituents against two mosquito vectors and their non-target aquatic predators. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Naqqash, M.N.; Gökçe, A.; Bakhsh, A.; Salim, M. Insecticide resistance and its molecular basis in urban insect pests. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 1363–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martins Laurentino, A.O.; de Medeiros, F.D.; de Oliveira, J.; da Rosa, N.; Mateus Gomes, T.; de Peretti, T.M.; Prophiro, J.S.; Fortunato, J.J. Effects of prenatal exposure to temephos on behavior and social interaction. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2019, 15, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pavela, R. Essential oils for the development of eco-friendly mosquito larvicides: A review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muema, J.M.; Bargul, J.L.; Njeru, S.N.; Onyango, J.O.; Imbahale, S.S. Prospects for malaria control through manipulation of mosquito larval habitats and olfactory-mediated behavioural responses using plant-derived compounds. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saddiq, A.A.; Khayyat, S.A. Chemical and antimicrobial studies of monoterpene: Citral. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 98, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pilon, A.C.; Grande, M.D.; Silvério, M.R.S.; Silva, R.S.; Albernaz, L.C.; Vieira, P.C.; Lopes, J.L.C.; Espindola, L.S.; Lopes, N.P. Combination of GC-MS molecular networking and larvicidal effect against Aedes aegypti for the discovery of bioactive substances in commercial essential oils. Molecules 2022, 27, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tak, J.H.; Isman, M.B. Metabolism of citral, the major constituent of lemongrass oil, in the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni, and effects of enzyme inhibitors on toxicity and metabolism. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2016, 133, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kumar, P.; Mishra, S.; Malik, A.; Satya, S. Housefly (Musca domestica L.) control potential of Cymbopogon citratus Stapf. (Poales: Poaceae) essential oil and monoterpenes (citral and 1,8-cineole). Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aungtikun, J.; Soonwera, M.; Sittichok, S. Insecticidal synergy of essential oils from Cymbopogon citratus (Stapf.), Myristica fragrans (Houtt.), and Illicium verun Hook.f. and their major active constitutes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 164, 113386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Muhoza, B.; Qi, B.; Harindintwali, J.D.; Koko, M.Y.F.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y. Encapsulation of cinnamaldehyde: An insight on delivery systems and food applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 2521–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheng, S.S.; Liu, J.Y.; Huang, C.G.; Hsui, Y.R.; Chen, W.J.; Chang, S.T. Insecticidal activities of leaf essential oils from Cinnamomum osmophloeum against three mosquito species. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aungtikun, J.; Soonwera, M. Improved adulticidal activity against Aedes aegypti (L.), and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) from synergy between Cinnamomum spp. essential oils. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamari, A.; Yusoff, S.N.M.; Wong, S.T.S.; Yusof, N.; Othman, H.; Hussein, M.Z.; Phillip, E. Development of anti-mosquito spray formulation based on lipid-core nanocapsules loaded with cinnamaldehyde for fabrics application. Fibers Polym. 2022, 23, 2156–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Soonwera, M.; Moungthipmalai, T.; Puwanard, C.; Sittichok, S.; Sinthusiri, J.; Passara, H. Adulticidal synergy of two plant essential oils and their major constituents against the housefly Musca domestica and bioassay on non-target species. Heliyon 2024, 10, e26910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dhinakaran, S.R.; Mathew, N.; Munusamy, S. Synergistic terpene combinations as larvicides against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti Linn. Drug. Dev. Res. 2019, 80, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sarma, R.; Adhikari, K.; Mahanta, S.; Khanikor, B. Combinations of plant essential oil based terpene compounds as larvicidal and adulticidal agent against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Spinozzi, E.; Ferrati, M.; Cappellacci, L.; Petrelli, R.; Baldassarri, C.; Morshedloo, M.R.; Maggi, F.; Pavela, R. Major monoterpenoids from Dracocephalum moldavica essential oil act as insecticides against Culex quinquefasciatus with synergistic and antagonistic effects. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 219, 119060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Soonwera, M.; Sittichok, S. Adulticidal activities of Cymbopogon citratus (Stapf.) and Eucalyptus globulus (Labill.) essential oils and their synergistic combination against Aedes aegypti (L.), Aedes albopictus (Skuse), and Musca domestica (L.). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 20201–20214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Youssef, M.R.; Tabari, M.A.; Esfandiari, A.; Kazemi, S.; Moghadamnia, A.A.; Sut, S.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Benelli, G.; Maggi, F. Efficacy of two monoterpenoids, carvacrol and thymol, and their combinations against eggs and larvae of the west nile vector Culex pipiens. Molecules 2019, 24, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Soonwera, M.; Sinthusiri, J.; Passara, H.; Moungthipmalai, T.; Puwanard, C.; Sittichok, S.; Murata, K. Combinations of lemongrass and star anise essential oils and their main constituent: Synergistic housefly repellency and safety against non-target organisms. Insects 2024, 15, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duarte, J.L.; Duchon, S.; Di Filippo, L.D.; Chorilli, M.; Corbel, V. Larvicidal properties of terpenoid-based nanoemulsions against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti L. and their potential toxicity against non-target organism. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0293124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nwanade, C.F.; Wang, M.; Li, H.; Masoudi, A.; Yu, Z.; Liu, J. Individual and synergistic toxicity of cinnamon essential oil constituents against Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) and their potential effects on non-target organisms. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 178, 114614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Burgger, B.P.; Martinez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; de Castro e Castro, B.M.; Soares, M.A.; Wilcken, C.F.; Carvalho, A.G.; Serrao, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Bioactive of the Cymbopogon citratus (Poaceae) essential oil and its terpenoids constituents on the predatory bug, Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8358. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hacke, A.C.M.; da Silva, F.D.A.; Lima, D.; Vellosa, J.C.R.; Rocha, J.B.T.; Marques, J.A.; Pereira, R.P. Cytotoxicity of Cymbopogon citratus (DC) Stapf fractions, essential oil, citral, and geraniol in human leukocytes and erythrocytes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 291, 115147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xavier, A.; Rani, S.S.; Shankar, R.; Nisha, A.R.; Sujith, S.; Uma, R. Evaluation of acute oral toxicity of lemongrass oil and citral in albino rats. J. Phytopharmacol. 2022, 11, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Baker, B.P.; Grant, J.A. Cinnamon & Cinnamon Oil Profile Active Ingredient Eligible for Minimum Risk Pesticide Use. Available online: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/700a4eca-b375-4ee8-ba8f-989813fe0fa2/content (accessed on 17 July 2024).
  35. WHO. Temephos in Drinking-Water: Use for Vector Control in Drinking-Water Sources and Containers. 2009. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/wash-documents/wash-chemicals/temephos-background-document.pdf?sfvrsn=c34fda71_4 (accessed on 12 July 2024).
  36. WHO. Guidelines for Laboratory and Field Testing of Mosquito Larvicides. 2005. Available online: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/69101 (accessed on 1 July 2024).
  37. Soonwera, M.; Moungthipmalai, T.; Aungtikun, J.; Sittichok, S. Combinations of plant essential oils and their major compositions inducing mortality and morphological abnormality of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Selvi, M.; Sarikaya, R.; Erkoc, F. Acute behavioral changes in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) exposed to temephos. Gazi Univ. J. Sci. 2004, 17, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wheeler, M.W.; Park, R.M.; Bailer, A.J. Comparing median lethal concentration values using confidence interval overlap or ratio tests. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25, 1441–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Candy, S.G. The application of generalized linear mixed models to multi-level sampling for insect population monitoring. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2000, 7, 217–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Passara, H.; Sittichok, S.; Sinthusiri, J.; Moungthipmalai, T.; Puwanard, C.; Murata, K.; Soonwera, M. Ovicidal toxicity and morphological changes in housefly eggs induced by the essential oils of star anise and lemongrass and their main constituents. Insects 2024, 15, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nakasen, K.; Wongsrila, A.; Prathumtet, J.; Sriraj, P.; Boonmars, T.; Promsrisuk, T.; Laikaew, N.; Aukkanimart, R. Bio efficacy of cinnamaldehyde from Cinnamomum verum essential oil against Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Entomol. Acarol. Res. 2021, 53, 9400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Soonwera, M.; Phasomkusolsil, S. Effect of Cymbopogon citratus (lemongrass) and Syzygium aromaticum (clove) oils on the morphology and mortality of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles dirus larvae. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 1691–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Davila-Barboza, J.A.; Gutierrez-Rodriguez, S.M.; Juache-Villagrana, A.E.; Lopez-Monroy, B.; Flores, A.E. Widespread resistance to temephos in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Mexico. Insects 2024, 15, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gad, A.A. Laboratory evaluation of some essential oils against immature stages of the filarial mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera:Culicidae). Alex. Sci. Exch. J. 2013, 34, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fujiwara, G.M.; Annies, V.; de Oliveira, C.F.; Lara, R.A.; Gabrie, M.M.; Betim, F.C.M.; Nadal, J.M.; Farago, P.V.; Dias, J.F.G.; Miguel, O.G.; et al. Evaluation of larvicidal activity and ecotoxicity of linalool, methyl cinnamate and methyl cinnamate/linalool in combination against Aedes aegypti. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 139, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Benelli, G.; Pavela, R.; Giordani, C.; Casettari, L.; Curzi, G.; Cappellacci, L.; Petrelli, R.; Petrelli, R. Acute and sub-lethal toxicity of eight essential oils of commercial interest against the filariasis mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus and the housefly Musca domestica. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 112, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alsalhi, M.S.; Elumalai, K.; Devanesan, S.; Govindarajan, M.; Krishnappa, K.; Maggi, F. The aromatic ginger Kaempferia galanga L. (Zingiberaceae) essential oil and its main compounds are effective larvicidal agents against Aedes vittatus and Anopheles maculatus without toxicity on the non-target aquatic fauna. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 158, 113012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. WHO. Who Specifications and Evaluations for Public Health Pesticides. 2010. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/prequal/ (accessed on 15 August 2024).
Figure 1. Mortality rate versus exposure time of test formulations against Ae. aegypti larvae: (A) single formulations and (B) binary mixtures. Note: The mean mortalities within a row (5, 15, and 30 min and 1, 6, and 24 h) labeled with different letters differ significantly by Tukey’s test.
Figure 1. Mortality rate versus exposure time of test formulations against Ae. aegypti larvae: (A) single formulations and (B) binary mixtures. Note: The mean mortalities within a row (5, 15, and 30 min and 1, 6, and 24 h) labeled with different letters differ significantly by Tukey’s test.
Insects 15 00714 g001
Figure 2. Mortality rate versus exposure time of test formulations against Ae. aegypti pupae: (A) single formulations and (B) binary mixtures.
Figure 2. Mortality rate versus exposure time of test formulations against Ae. aegypti pupae: (A) single formulations and (B) binary mixtures.
Insects 15 00714 g002
Figure 3. Lethal time 50% (LT50) of single and binary mixtures and 1% temephos against Ae. aegypti larvae and pupae. Note: LT50 = lethal time that kills 50% of the exposed organisms, LL = 95% lower confidence limit, and UL = 95% upper confidence limit.
Figure 3. Lethal time 50% (LT50) of single and binary mixtures and 1% temephos against Ae. aegypti larvae and pupae. Note: LT50 = lethal time that kills 50% of the exposed organisms, LL = 95% lower confidence limit, and UL = 95% upper confidence limit.
Insects 15 00714 g003
Figure 4. Synergistic mortality index (SMI) of several binary mixtures against larvae and pupae of Ae. aegypti.
Figure 4. Synergistic mortality index (SMI) of several binary mixtures against larvae and pupae of Ae. aegypti.
Insects 15 00714 g004
Figure 5. Increased mortality value (IMV) of binary mixtures against Ae. aegypti versus corresponding single formulations: (A) larvae and (B) pupae.
Figure 5. Increased mortality value (IMV) of binary mixtures against Ae. aegypti versus corresponding single formulations: (A) larvae and (B) pupae.
Insects 15 00714 g005
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs showing differences between untreated and treated larvae at the ultra-structural level: (A) normal larvae surface with head (H), thorax (TH), and abdomen (A); (B) normal lateral view of head capsule and mouth brushes of larvae with anteromedian palatal brush (Apb), lateral palatal brush (Lpb), antenna (An), maxillary palp (Mp), and labium (La); (C) normal final abdomen segments with abdominal segment (As), with comb scales (Cs), respiratory siphon (S) with pecten teeth (Pt), anal papillae (Ap), upper anal seta (Uas), cratal setae (Crs), and ventral brush (Vb); and (D) normal respiratory siphon with stigma opening (So), anterolateral spiracular lobe (Asl), posterolateral spiracular lobe (Psl), lateral perispiracular lobe (Lpl), anterior perispiracular lobe (Asl), and terminal spiracle (Tsp) (white arrow). Morphological changes showing damage and swelling of the anal papillae and respiratory siphon as well as abnormal head, abdomen, and thorax surfaces after the larvae were treated with single and binary mixtures of geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde (EH) (yellow arrow).
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs showing differences between untreated and treated larvae at the ultra-structural level: (A) normal larvae surface with head (H), thorax (TH), and abdomen (A); (B) normal lateral view of head capsule and mouth brushes of larvae with anteromedian palatal brush (Apb), lateral palatal brush (Lpb), antenna (An), maxillary palp (Mp), and labium (La); (C) normal final abdomen segments with abdominal segment (As), with comb scales (Cs), respiratory siphon (S) with pecten teeth (Pt), anal papillae (Ap), upper anal seta (Uas), cratal setae (Crs), and ventral brush (Vb); and (D) normal respiratory siphon with stigma opening (So), anterolateral spiracular lobe (Asl), posterolateral spiracular lobe (Psl), lateral perispiracular lobe (Lpl), anterior perispiracular lobe (Asl), and terminal spiracle (Tsp) (white arrow). Morphological changes showing damage and swelling of the anal papillae and respiratory siphon as well as abnormal head, abdomen, and thorax surfaces after the larvae were treated with single and binary mixtures of geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde (EH) (yellow arrow).
Insects 15 00714 g006
Figure 7. Morphological differences between untreated and treated pupae at the ultra-structural level: (A) normal pupae surface with head (H), cephalothorax (Ct), abdomen (A), compound eye sheath (Ces), trumpet (Tr), mouthpart sheath (Ms), leg sheath (Ls), and wing sheath (Ws); (B,C) normal lateral view of the respiratory trumpet and related structures with scutum (Sct), respiratory trumpet (Tr), filter apparatus (Fa), pinna (Pi), and meatus (Me); and (D) normal terminal abdominal structure with genital lobe (Gl), paddle (Pa), midrib (Mr), and filamentous spicule (fringes) (Fs) (white arrow). Morphological changes showing damage and swelling of the respiratory trumpet and related structures of the trumpet as well as an abnormality of the head, cephalothorax, abdomen, and terminal abdominal structure surfaces after the larvae were treated with geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde (EH) (yellow arrow).
Figure 7. Morphological differences between untreated and treated pupae at the ultra-structural level: (A) normal pupae surface with head (H), cephalothorax (Ct), abdomen (A), compound eye sheath (Ces), trumpet (Tr), mouthpart sheath (Ms), leg sheath (Ls), and wing sheath (Ws); (B,C) normal lateral view of the respiratory trumpet and related structures with scutum (Sct), respiratory trumpet (Tr), filter apparatus (Fa), pinna (Pi), and meatus (Me); and (D) normal terminal abdominal structure with genital lobe (Gl), paddle (Pa), midrib (Mr), and filamentous spicule (fringes) (Fs) (white arrow). Morphological changes showing damage and swelling of the respiratory trumpet and related structures of the trumpet as well as an abnormality of the head, cephalothorax, abdomen, and terminal abdominal structure surfaces after the larvae were treated with geranial and trans-cinnamaldehyde (EH) (yellow arrow).
Insects 15 00714 g007
Figure 8. Mortality of single and binary mixtures and 1% (w/w) temephos 1 ppm in guppies at 10 days after treatment. Standard errors are indicated in the error bars. Note: mean mortalities within a row marked by a different letter differed significantly by Tukey’s test.
Figure 8. Mortality of single and binary mixtures and 1% (w/w) temephos 1 ppm in guppies at 10 days after treatment. Standard errors are indicated in the error bars. Note: mean mortalities within a row marked by a different letter differed significantly by Tukey’s test.
Insects 15 00714 g008
Figure 9. Biosafety index (BI) for guppies sharing an identical ecological niche as Ae. aegypti larvae and pupae, exposed to single and binary mixtures and 1% temephos 1 ppm.
Figure 9. Biosafety index (BI) for guppies sharing an identical ecological niche as Ae. aegypti larvae and pupae, exposed to single and binary mixtures and 1% temephos 1 ppm.
Insects 15 00714 g009
Table 1. Synergistic insecticidal combinations of monoterpenes against mosquitoes and houseflies.
Table 1. Synergistic insecticidal combinations of monoterpenes against mosquitoes and houseflies.
CombinationActivity AgainstStageReferences
d-limonenegeranialAe. aegyptieggs[8]
geranialtrans-cinnamaldehyde
geranialtrans-anetholeM. domesticaadults[17,22]
geranialα-pinene
trans-anetholecarvacrolAe. aegyptilarvae[23]
R- (+)-limonenetrans-anethole
eugenollimoneneAe. aegyptilarvae and adults[24]
diallyldisulfidelimonene
geraniolcitralCx. quinquefasciatuslarvae[25]
1,8-cineolegeranialAe. aegypti and Ae. albopictus adults[26]
1,8-cineoleα-pineneCx. pipiensadults[27]
carvoneR (+)-pulegone
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sittichok, S.; Passara, H.; Sinthusiri, J.; Moungthipmalai, T.; Puwanard, C.; Murata, K.; Soonwera, M. Synergistic Larvicidal and Pupicidal Toxicity and the Morphological Impact of the Dengue Vector (Aedes aegypti) Induced by Geranial and trans-Cinnamaldehyde. Insects 2024, 15, 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090714

AMA Style

Sittichok S, Passara H, Sinthusiri J, Moungthipmalai T, Puwanard C, Murata K, Soonwera M. Synergistic Larvicidal and Pupicidal Toxicity and the Morphological Impact of the Dengue Vector (Aedes aegypti) Induced by Geranial and trans-Cinnamaldehyde. Insects. 2024; 15(9):714. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090714

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sittichok, Sirawut, Hataichanok Passara, Jirisuda Sinthusiri, Tanapoom Moungthipmalai, Cheepchanok Puwanard, Kouhei Murata, and Mayura Soonwera. 2024. "Synergistic Larvicidal and Pupicidal Toxicity and the Morphological Impact of the Dengue Vector (Aedes aegypti) Induced by Geranial and trans-Cinnamaldehyde" Insects 15, no. 9: 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop