Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Integral Water Tank on the Seismic Performance of Slender Structure: An Experimental Study
Previous Article in Journal
Fluid Flow Characteristics for Four Lattice Settings in Brick Tunnel Kiln: CFD Simulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Techno-Environmental Assessment of Insulation Materials in Saudi Arabia: Integrating Thermal Performance and LCA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Sustainable Development: Emerging Trends in Energy Efficiency, Carbon Reduction, and Green Building Materials

1
Department of Early Childhood Development and Education, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413, Taiwan
2
Department of Construction Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413, Taiwan
3
Department of Applied Chemistry, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2023, 13(3), 735; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030735
Submission received: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
On 4 March, World Engineering for Sustainable Development Day provides an opportunity to highlight what engineers and engineering have achieved in our modern world and to raise public understanding of how engineering and technology are at the heart of modern life and sustainable development. Here, we provide an overview of a Special Issue of Buildings entitled “Sustainable Development: Emerging Trends in Energy Efficiency, Carbon Reduction, and Green Building Materials” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings/special_issues/Sustainable_Carbon, last accessed 22 January 2023) and the scientific papers it hosts.
This Special Issue aims to report on Sustainable Development: New Trends in Energy Conservation, Carbon Reduction, and Green Building Materials, and to build a global partnership for sustainable development to improve buildings and human life and protect the environment. The construction industry is one of the largest resource-consuming industries in the world, including the extraction of materials, consumption of energy and water, and generation of waste. Sustainability is, therefore, a key objective of the national circular economy policy—a regenerative economy in which the negative impact of the construction industry on the environment is minimized.
This Special Issue is dedicated to the publication of papers describing the most important research in building materials, repairs, and renovations, with a focus on advanced, sustainable, or green buildings, which could have an impact on the construction industry based on innovative and circular economic principles. International research teams from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, India, Jordan, and Taiwan published six original research papers. All of these contributions address topics considered effective or regional efforts, including environmental assessment of insulation materials [1], life cycle assessment (LCA) [2,3,4,5], environmentally friendly flame retardants, PLA/PBS biocomposites [6,7], decarbonization strategies, building information modeling (BIM), building decarbonization [8], high-rise residential buildings, Anchor Pile with Steel Cable Systems (APSCS), CO2 curing, fiber-porous concrete, sustainable construction methods [9], high-strength pervious concrete, and circular economies [10].
Liu et al. [11] reported a sustainable case study on construction methods and a circular economy using a unique method of excavation protection for building foundations. According to the authors’ introduction, the application of the APSCS method in the Linkou public rental housing project was successful and has reference significance for other similar projects. An estimated USD 12 million was saved in construction costs, and the construction period was shortened by up to three months.
Lee et al. [12] studied the mechanical properties of ordinary and high-strength pervious concrete using steel or glass fibers. The authors concluded that the high-strength pervious concrete specimen with 2% steel fiber content had a higher compressive strength of 52.8 MPa at 28 days. In addition, both glass fiber and steel fiber can improve the bending toughness and toughness factor to a certain extent, and the mechanical properties of steel fiber are better.
Wang et al. [13] studied the mechanical properties of CO2-curing Portland cement concrete. The authors found that CO2 was active in fresh Portland cement concrete. Concrete cured by CO2 has higher early compressive strength than concrete cured by water. When it reaches an age of 28 days, the compressive strength of CO2-cured concrete is close to that of water-cured concrete.
Alotaibi et al. [14] published an article on decarbonization strategies and carbon-containing life cycle assessments for tall residential buildings. They concluded that the carbon emissions of the selected buildings were approximately 400 kg CO2eq/m2/year and evaluated different decarbonization strategies, which could be reduced to 135 kg CO2e/m2/year using the first analysis as a baseline.
Shi et al. [15] focused their attention on exploiting the flammability, thermal stability, and mechanical properties of PLA/PBS composites. They reported that the P/15B/15PA-Arg biocomposite increased total heat release rate, peak heat release rate, and coke residue by about 108 MJ/m2, 280 kW/m2, and 10%, respectively. The mechanical results showed that the performance of P/15B/PA-Arg series biocomposites was better than that of the P/15B/PA-PEI series.
Alotaibi et al. [16] reported the comprehensive thermal performance and LCA for the environmental assessment of insulating materials technology in Saudi Arabia. The analysis results show that the material density is the main parameter affecting the GWP of insulating materials. Viewing insulation materials and applications as a combination of thermal and environmental performance parameters provides a powerful tool for customizing insulation applications in various climates.
The Guest Editors of this Special Issue thank all the authors for their scientific support and for sharing their knowledge in different fields of research related to “Sustainability in Buildings”. The Guest Editors thank the peer reviewers for their rigorous scrutiny and analysis of the Issue’s contributions, as well as the managing editors involved in this Special Issue for their assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-G.L. and Y.-F.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hill, C.; Norton, A.; Dibdiakova, J. A comparison of the environmental impacts of different categories of insulation materials. Energy Build. 2018, 162, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rodrigues, C.; König, J.; Freire, F. Prospective life cycle assessment of a novel building system with improved foam glass incorporating high recycled content. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023, 36, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arvidsson, R.; Tillman, A.M.; Sandén, B.A.; Janssen, M.; Nordelöf, A.; Kushnir, D.; Molander, S. Environmental assessment of emerging technologies: Recommendations for prospective LCA. J. Ind. Ecol. 2018, 22, 1286–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hossain, M.U.; Ng, S.T. Influence of waste materials on buildings’ life cycle environmental impacts: Adopting resource recovery principle. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 142, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ingrao, C.; Scrucca, F.; Tricase, C.; Asdrubali, F. A comparative life cycle assessment of external wall-compositions for cleaner construction solutions in buildings. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 124, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arregi, B.; Garay-Martinez, R.; Astudillo, J.; Garca, M.; Ramos, J.C. Experimental and numerical thermal performance assessment of a multi-layer building envelope component made of biocomposite materials. Energy Build. 2020, 214, 109846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scaffaro, R.; Maio, A.; Gulino, E.F.; Megna, B. Structure-property relationship of PLA-Opuntia Ficus Indica biocomposites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 167, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Toosi, H.A.; Lavagna, M.; Leonforte, F.; Del Pero, C.; Aste, N. Building decarbonization: Assessing the potential of building-integrated photovoltaics and thermal energy storage systems. Energy 2022, 8 (Suppl. 16), 574–581. [Google Scholar]
  9. Raut, S.P.; Ralegaonkar, R.V.; Mandavgane, S.A. Development of sustainable construction material using industrial and agricultural solid waste: A review of waste-create bricks. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 4037–4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ding, L.; Wang, T.; Chan, P.W. Forward and reverse logistics for circular economy in construction: A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 388, 135981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, T.-Y.; Ho, S.-J.; Tserng, H.-P.; Tzou, H.-K. Using a Unique Retaining Method for Building Foundation Excavation: A Case Study on Sustainable Construction Methods and Circular Economy. Buildings 2022, 12, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, M.-G.; Wang, W.-C.; Wang, Y.-C.; Hsieh, Y.-C.; Lin, Y.-C. Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Pervious Concrete with Steel Fiber or Glass Fiber. Buildings 2022, 12, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.-C.; Lee, M.-G.; Wang, W.-C.; Kan, Y.-C.; Kao, S.-H.; Chang, H.-W. CO2 Curing on the Mechanical Properties of Portland Cement Concrete. Buildings 2022, 12, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alotaibi, B.S.; Khan, S.A.; Abuhussain, M.A.; Al-Tamimi, N.; Elnaklah, R.; Kamal, M.A. Life Cycle Assessment of Embodied Carbon and Strategies for Decarbonization of a High-Rise Residential Building. Buildings 2022, 12, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shih, Y.-F.; Lin, C.-W.; Cai, Y.-L.; Jahan, K.; Chen, Y.-H. Effects of Bio-Based Polyelectrolyte Complex on Thermal Stability, Flammability, and Mechanical Properties Performance Utilization in PLA/PBS Composites. Buildings 2023, 13, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alsaqabi, Y.; Almhafdy, A.; Haider, H.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A.; Ali, A.A.M. Techno-Environmental Assessment of Insulation Materials in Saudi Arabia: Integrating Thermal Performance and LCA. Buildings 2023, 13, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.; Lee, M.-G.; Shih, Y.-F.; Lee, L. Sustainable Development: Emerging Trends in Energy Efficiency, Carbon Reduction, and Green Building Materials. Buildings 2023, 13, 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030735

AMA Style

Lee J, Lee M-G, Shih Y-F, Lee L. Sustainable Development: Emerging Trends in Energy Efficiency, Carbon Reduction, and Green Building Materials. Buildings. 2023; 13(3):735. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030735

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jeremiah, Ming-Gin Lee, Yeng-Fong Shih, and Liza Lee. 2023. "Sustainable Development: Emerging Trends in Energy Efficiency, Carbon Reduction, and Green Building Materials" Buildings 13, no. 3: 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030735

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop