3.3.2. Analysis of High-Frequency Co-Cited Literature
The frequency of citations of co-cited references can illustrate an author’s academic capabilities and their contribution and impact on research topics. Analyzing highly cited documents can provide insights into current research hotspots. Using CiteSpace for co-citation analysis in the database, a network was constructed with 532 nodes and 1416 links, having a density of 0.01, as shown in
Figure 6. The top ten most frequently cited articles were statistically organized and summarized to extract the research directions of most interest to current scholars, as displayed in
Table 6.
From
Table 6, it is evident that the most cited article, published in 2009, “A review on photovoltaic/thermal hybrid solar technology” has received 900 citations. This article reviews the research and development trends in photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) solar collectors and their applications in solar heating, solar greenhouses, photovoltaic thermal solar heat pumps/air conditioning systems, and building-integrated PV/thermal systems [
20]. The second most cited article, published in 2019, “A high-resolution geospatial assessment of the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in the European Union”, which combines satellite data, statistical data, and machine learning, performs a reliable assessment of the technical potential for rooftop solar photovoltaic power across the EU with a spatial resolution of 100 m [
21].
Recent years have seen high citation frequencies for articles such as Zhong et al. [
22] in 2021, which developed a deep learning-based method to automatically extract rooftop areas through image semantic segmentation to estimate the solar photovoltaic potential at the urban scale, showing that Nanjing has significant rooftop photovoltaic installation potential. Li et al. [
23] studied the characteristics of photovoltaic panel semantic segmentation from a computer vision perspective, finding that photovoltaic panel image data have uniform texture and heterogeneous color features, as well as effective semantic segmentation resolution thresholds. This illustrates that applying computer technologies like deep learning to solar photovoltaic roofs is a recent research hotspot, and the evaluation of rooftop solar photovoltaic potential has consistently maintained research interest. Applications of technology, resource assessments, deep learning, and image processing are among the topics receiving considerable attention within the field of solar photovoltaic roofs, showcasing the diversity and cutting-edge nature of this area.
Figure 6.
Literature co-citation analysis [
20,
21,
22].
Figure 6.
Literature co-citation analysis [
20,
21,
22].
Table 6.
The top 10 most commonly cited articles.
Table 6.
The top 10 most commonly cited articles.
NO. | Title | Journals | Time | DOI | Authors | Citation Frequency |
---|
1 | A review of photovoltaic/thermal hybrid solar technology | Applied Energy | 2009 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.037 | Chow, TT | 900 |
2 | A high-resolution geospatial assessment of the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in the European Union | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | 2019 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109309 | Bódis, K | 687 |
3 | Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings: A review | Applied Energy | 2015 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.028 | Luthander, R | 672 |
4 | A method for predicting city-wide electricity gains from photovoltaic panels based on LiDAR and GIS data combined with hourly Daysim simulations | Solar Energy | 2013 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.03.022 | Jakubiec, JA | 203 |
5 | Improved photovoltaic self-consumption with appliance scheduling in 200 single-family buildings | Applied Energy | 2014 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.008 | Widén, J | 134 |
6 | Development of a method for estimating the rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) potential by analyzing the available rooftop area using Hillshade analysis | Applied Energy | 2017 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.001 | Hong, T | 129 |
7 | Simulation and analysis of a solar-assisted heat pump system with two different storage types for high levels of PV electricity self-consumption | Solar Energy | 2014 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.013 | Thygesen, R | 89 |
8 | A cooperative net zero energy community to improve load matching | Renewable Energy | 2016 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.044 | Lopes, RA | 82 |
9 | Review of geographic information system-based rooftop solar photovoltaic potential estimation approaches at urban scales | Applied Energy | 2021 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116817 | Gassar, AAA | 79 |
10 | Urban solar utilization potential mapping via deep learning technology: A case study of Wuhan, China | Applied Energy | 2019 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.113 | Huang, ZJ | 71 |
3.3.3. Keyword Co-Occurrence Analysis
Using CiteSpace’s keyword co-occurrence analysis feature, an analysis was conducted on the database of articles, revealing the research field’s hot topics and future development trends. The keywords “solar photovoltaic roof” and “energy consumption”, used as search terms in setting up the database, were excluded from the analysis. The established keyword co-occurrence network consists of 376 nodes and 1495 links, with a network density of 0.0212, indicating very tight connections between nodes, as shown in
Figure 7. After statistical organization, the top 15 keywords by frequency and centrality were identified, as listed in
Table 7. According to
Figure 7 and
Table 7, the keywords “solar energy”, “performance”, “energy”, and “renewable energy” had the highest occurrence frequency, while the top four keywords by centrality were “buildings”, “energy”, “performance”, and “solar energy”, each with a centrality exceeding 0.1. This indicates that research on solar photovoltaic roofs primarily focuses on assessing the performance of photovoltaic systems, including evaluations of power output, economic benefits, and environmental impacts. Secondary research interests include the performance of photovoltaic components, particularly their thermal, lighting, and power generation capabilities. Lastly, the feasibility studies of photovoltaic installations, such as simulations of solar radiation on building facades, power generation, and installation potential, are also prominent areas of research.
Based on keyword co-occurrence analysis, a keyword clustering analysis map was obtained, as shown in
Figure 8. A cluster silhouette value greater than 0.5 indicates reasonable clustering, while a value greater than 0.7 suggests convincing clustering. Keywords were divided into 12 categories, numbered from 0 to 11, as listed in
Table 8. The smaller the cluster number, the larger its size, with each cluster composed of closely related keywords [
24]. All 12 obtained clusters have silhouette values significantly greater than 0.7, demonstrating a high credibility of the clustering results. Another critical value to consider in the clustering network is the Q value; the Q value of this study’s keyword clustering network is 0.908, far exceeding 0.3, indicating a very significant clustering structure. Further analysis will be conducted on these credible and large-scale clusters.
Solar photovoltaic (PV) roofs play a significant role in the utilization of renewable energy in buildings. This cluster, the largest among all, comprises 51 documents and is primarily associated with the keywords renewable energy, building envelope, passive design, tropical developing country, and domestic residential power. A comprehensive analysis of research on solar PV roofs reveals that integrating PV components with building elements (roofs, sunshades, and louvers) is a common form in practical applications. The design challenge lies in finding a balance between the original functionality of the components and the added photovoltaic performance. Jhumka et al. [
25] employed a novel approach through validated simulation modeling, combining thermal finite element analysis (FEA) with dynamic whole-building simulation to assess the heat transfer characteristics of photovoltaic panels on the facades or roofs of typical office buildings in Mauritius as well as the resultant energy consumption. Elghamry et al. [
26] conducted a parametric study on the impact of solar cells on buildings’ power output, energy consumption, comfort conditions (indoor temperature, relative humidity, discomfort hours, and lighting), and carbon dioxide emissions, considering factors like unit positioning on the facade, orientation, and location (wall and roof). Photovoltaic (PV) roofs have been widely promoted across various types of buildings, thanks in large part to the extensive adoption of PV roofs in residential buildings, which has laid a foundation for their development. Countries such as Germany, the United States, and Japan have implemented different policies to drive the energy transformation of residential buildings. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the benefits and returns of PV roofs after the support period ends. Klamka et al. [
27] conducted an analysis of the energy-saving potential of PV roofs in German residential buildings, finding that self-consumed PV energy occupies a significant proportion and can yield personal profit, which is advantageous for the promotion of renewable energy.
Green roofs, although they do not directly generate energy, contribute to thermal insulation, sound insulation, and heat retention, reducing indoor temperatures in the summer and thus decreasing the energy consumption of air conditioning systems, indirectly reducing the demand for non-renewable energy sources. The primary keywords associated with this cluster include solar energy, rural energy, deep learning, rooftop solar photovoltaic, and power density. Solar photovoltaic (PV) roofs utilize solar energy for electricity production, helping to reduce the dependence on conventional fossil fuels and thereby lessen environmental pollution. In some cases, building rooftops can accommodate both green roofs and solar PV installations, achieving dual benefits. Zheng and Weng [
28] tested the potential mitigative effects of green roofs and photovoltaic systems on the increased building energy demand caused by climate change in Los Angeles County, California. Movahhed et al. [
29] used the net present value (NPV) method to study the impact of green roofs and rooftop photovoltaic panels on the energy efficiency of typical buildings, considering three types of vegetation cover and three types of commercial solar panels. The presence of green roofs reduced energy consumption by about 0.1%, while photovoltaic systems could generate 26 megawatt-hours annually, with a payback period of 6.5 to 7.5 years.
Office buildings present significant potential for the installation of solar photovoltaic roofs. This cluster includes key terms such as building shape, residential energy model, efficient design, HVAC demand, and building energy simulation. In addition to the performance of photovoltaic components, the design significantly influences the overall performance of photovoltaic buildings. For BAPV systems, common design focuses include the positioning, inclination, and orientation of photovoltaic panels. For BIPV systems, photovoltaic components are integrated with building materials or structures, participating more closely in the interaction between the building envelope and the indoor and outdoor environments, considering factors such as building lighting, thermal environment, and aesthetics.
Flexible and controllable parametric methods have been proven viable for enhancing photovoltaic building performance. Esfahani et al. [
30] optimized solar radiation reception by adjusting the building layout, orientation, and roof shape (aspect ratio, slope, and lateral tilt). Miao et al. [
31] studied and compared the balance between solar energy collection and energy consumption and savings under different geometric roof shapes in a subtropical climate due to uncontrolled daylight admission, glare, and solar heat gains. Current research uses a grid node method to control building shapes, meshing the building shape and then controlling node coordinates [
32], where more nodes require higher flexibility in the parametric model, and fewer nodes might underexploit photovoltaic potential [
33]. The control process is constrained by parameters such as building footprint dimensions, local orientation, and tilt angles.
Additionally, energy simulation plays a critical role in the design of photovoltaic roofs, facilitating the assessment of system performance across various conditions, including energy output, heat output, and comfort. Designers leverage simulation to optimize photovoltaic roof system designs, including the layout, angle, and orientation of panels, providing data-driven and scientifically analyzed decision support to the design team.
Table 9 summarizes recent studies on architectural photovoltaic roof design, including input variables, output results, tools, and conclusions. Based on parametric model analysis, evaluation, and optimization, the routine process for photovoltaic performance design and optimization, as
Table 9 shows, commonly used tool combinations include Revit and Dynamo, and Rhino and Grasshopper, the latter favored by architects and researchers for its user-friendly interface, high openness, and rich ecosystem. Current studies typically target 2–3 optimization objectives, extending beyond photovoltaic performance to include building energy consumption, lighting environment, and thermal environment. Many studies have optimized economic performance with a diverse set of evaluation metrics; however, optimization of carbon emissions is less common, with more studies focusing on balancing electricity generation and building energy consumption. Currently, building design optimization primarily focuses on spatial efficiency, while assessments of architectural aesthetics are typically considered only during the final case selection stage and are not effectively quantified.
3.3.4. Research Trends and Outburst Word Analysis
To better illustrate the evolution of research on solar photovoltaic roofs, a keyword visualization timeline has been established, as shown in
Figure 9. The “renewable energy” cluster first appeared in 2005, with a significant increase in research output starting in 2009. From 2015 to 2020, there was a significant increase in the volume of related research within this cluster, forming a large-scale research direction; however, post-2020, there was a decline in the number of studies. The cluster for “building integrated photovoltaics” appeared later, in 2015, but immediately experienced an explosive growth in research quantity. Factors contributing to this growth include improvements in solar cell efficiency and enhancements in the performance of photovoltaic materials, making BIPV systems more mature and reliable. The “economic analysis” cluster, one of the earliest to form, saw growth only in 2009, with fewer studies and reduced attention in other years.
Based on keyword cluster analysis, the top 25 emerging terms were identified and are displayed in
Figure 10. The years in which these keywords appeared are highlighted in deep blue. Red-highlighted years indicate periods during which these keywords had a significant impact and were research hotspots. The “intensity” label indicates the degree of emergence, with higher numbers signifying greater intensity. Keywords in the solar PV roof field often appear with strong intensity, highlighting their cutting-edge nature. “Economic analysis” and "life cycle assessment” have had a prolonged period of strong influence and prominence, although interest in these topics has recently declined. Keywords such as “PV”, “generation”, “rooftop photovoltaic”, and “efficiency” have shown strong forefront relevance from 2021 and continue to be prominent research foci.
Figure 9.
Evolution view of keyword co-occurrence network.
Figure 9.
Evolution view of keyword co-occurrence network.
Figure 10.
Top 25 keywords with the strongest citation bursts.
Figure 10.
Top 25 keywords with the strongest citation bursts.
This article, supported by
Figure 9 and
Figure 10, examines research trends in solar photovoltaic roof technologies over various time periods. Research on solar PV rooftop technology began early but was limited by technological and economic conditions. Before 2002, the number of publications was quite limited and mostly confined to energy-related fields. From 2002 to 2015, there was a surge in research on photovoltaic cells, particularly regarding their performance and energy storage. Photovoltaic cells, primarily based on silicon wafers, were categorized into monocrystalline silicon and polycrystalline silicon. Before 2015, polycrystalline cells almost monopolized the market. However, with breakthroughs in monocrystalline silicon production processes and the commercial application of passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) technology in p-type monocrystalline silicon cells, the shipment of monocrystalline cells surpassed that of polycrystalline. This period laid a solid foundation for future research on materials such as cadmium telluride and copper indium gallium selenide cells. The economic impact of these technologies was also a focal point during this time.
From 2015 to 2020, keywords such as behavior, energy performance, and BIPV became prevalent. Scholars increasingly focused on the performance and energy efficiency of solar photovoltaic roofs. Due to the increase in operating temperature of photovoltaic (PV) modules, which leads to a decrease in power generation efficiency, there has been significant attention on how to effectively reduce the operating temperature of rooftop PV systems to minimize efficiency losses, especially in high-temperature regions. Existing PV cooling technologies include natural convection, air cooling, water cooling, evaporative cooling, phase change materials (PCM), and heat pipe cooling. These technologies are continuously evolving to improve the overall efficiency of rooftop PV systems. Bevilacqua et al. [
40] conducted a comparative analysis of a spray cooling system operating on the back of PV modules and a forced ventilation system within a cavity. The results demonstrated that the simple spray cooling system exhibited excellent performance. In addition to studying the optimization of photovoltaic cell materials to enhance power generation, many researchers have employed simulation techniques to explore the optimal arrangement parameters of photovoltaic modules for maximizing electricity output. The primary goal was to enhance the electricity output and economic potential of rooftop photovoltaic modules. In 2015, Madessa et al. [
41] studied a flat-roof residential building in Oslo using PVsyst 6.6.3 software, finding that the spacing and angle of photovoltaic arrays significantly affected electricity generation. That same year, Martinez-Rubio et al. [
42] proposed a method for determining the optimal orientation of PV modules based on their effective sunlight hours or maximum electricity generation. This method could be applied to rooftops of various types and geographical locations to design the orientation, tilt angle, and size of the PV arrays.
From 2020 to the present, there has been an explosive increase in keywords such as solar collector, solar cells, PV, generation, and efficiency. Research has increasingly integrated with computer simulation techniques, incorporating neural networks and deep learning to reduce energy consumption and enhance the energy efficiency of photovoltaic buildings. Zhou et al. [
43] developed a high-resolution assessment framework that combines top–down and bottom–up approaches to evaluate the zero-energy potential of photovoltaic systems in urban buildings, designing energy solutions based on the location of solar panels and the window-to-wall ratio. Various algorithms have also been incorporated into research, such as a multi-objective method based on the gravitational search algorithm (GSA) for sizing and distributing distributed generators (DG) and shunt capacitors (SCs) in distribution systems integrated with rooftop PV systems [
44]. This demonstrates the widespread application of optimization algorithms driven by the need for improved performance in photovoltaic architecture.