Next Article in Journal
Building Digital Twins to Overcome Digitalization Barriers for Automating Construction Site Management
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Mechanical Performance, Durability, and Microscopic Mechanism of Cement Mortar Modified by a Composite of Graphene Oxide and Nano-Calcium Carbonate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intelligent Systems Integrating BIM and VR for Urban Subway Microenvironmental Health Risks Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Green Skepticism? How Do Chinese College Students Feel about Green Retrofitting of College Sports Stadiums?

1
Graduate Department, Xi’an Physical Education University, Xi’an 710068, China
2
School of Sports Engineering and Information Technology, Wuhan Sport University, Wuhan 430079, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Buildings 2024, 14(7), 2237; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072237 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 May 2024 / Revised: 2 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 20 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Building Design and Construction for a Sustainable Future)

Abstract

This paper examined the factors influencing Chinese college students’ psychological perceptions of green retrofitting of college sports stadiums. It focused on the roles of green skepticism, future rational cognition, and future perceptual cognition. A total of 551 college students from five universities in Xi’an were tested. The results indicated that college students’ green skepticism, future rational cognition, future perceptual cognition, and psychological perceptions of green retrofitting of college sports stadiums were at a moderate level and that green skepticism had a significant and negative influence on college students’ psychological perceptions of green retrofitting of college sports stadiums. Green skepticism was a significant negative predictor of environmental values (β = −0.183, p < 0.001), natural empathy (β = −0.164, p < 0.001), and moral elevation (β = −0.187, p < 0.001). In addition, future rational cognition and future perceptual cognition served as parallel mediators in the college students’ psychological perceptions of green retrofitting of stadiums. It is notable that the mediating effect of future rational cognition was greater than that of future perceptual cognition. The findings indicate that resolving green skepticism and enhancing transparency and trust are crucial for enhancing college students’ psychological perceptions and the behavioral benefits of green retrofitting of college sports stadiums. Furthermore, the facilitating effect of future rational cognition and future perceptual cognition assists college students in making more rational and ethical decisions and in garnering broad support for environmental actions.
Keywords: green retrofitting of college sports stadiums; green skepticism; future orientation; college students’ green awareness green retrofitting of college sports stadiums; green skepticism; future orientation; college students’ green awareness

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hou, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, Z.; Huang, Q. Green Skepticism? How Do Chinese College Students Feel about Green Retrofitting of College Sports Stadiums? Buildings 2024, 14, 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072237

AMA Style

Hou Y, Chen S, Zhang Y, Yao Z, Huang Q. Green Skepticism? How Do Chinese College Students Feel about Green Retrofitting of College Sports Stadiums? Buildings. 2024; 14(7):2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hou, Yuyang, Sen Chen, Yujie Zhang, Zhening Yao, and Qian Huang. 2024. "Green Skepticism? How Do Chinese College Students Feel about Green Retrofitting of College Sports Stadiums?" Buildings 14, no. 7: 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop