Next Article in Journal
Colistin Resistance Mechanism in Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii Isolated from Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in France
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro and In Silico Analyses of New Cinnamid and Rosmarinic Acid-Derived Compounds Biosynthesized in Escherichia coli as Leishmania amazonensis Arginase Inhibitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/pathogens11091021
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evolution of the Ace-1 and Gste2 Mutations and Their Potential Impact on the Use of Carbamate and Organophosphates in IRS for Controlling Anopheles gambiae s.l., the Major Malaria Mosquito in Senegal

by
Moussa Diallo
1,2,
Ebrima SM Kolley
1,
Abdoulaye Kane Dia
2,
Mary Aigbiremo Oboh
1,
Fatoumata Seck
1,
Jarra Manneh
3,
Abdul Karim Sesay
3,
Seynabou Macote Diédhiou
2,
Pape Cheikh Sarr
2,
Ousmane Sy
2,
Badara Samb
2,
Oumar Gaye
4,
Ousmane Faye
2,
Lassana Konaté
2,
Benoit Sessinou Assogba
1,*,† and
El Hadji Amadou Niang
2,*,†
1
Disease Control and Elimination Theme, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul P.O. Box 273, The Gambia
2
Laboratoire d’Ecologie Vectorielle et Parasitaire, Faculté des Sciences et Technique, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar 10200, Senegal
3
Genomics Core Platform, Medical Research Council Unit, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul P.O. Box 273, The Gambia
4
Laboratoire de Parasitologie Médicale, Pharmacie et d’Odonto-Stomatologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar 10200, Senegal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2022, 11(9), 1021; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091021
Submission received: 14 August 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Parasitic Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Widespread of insecticide resistance amongst the species of the Anopheles gambiae complex continues to threaten vector control in Senegal. In this study, we investigated the presence and evolution of the Ace-1 and Gste2 resistance genes in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l., the main malaria vector in Senegal. Using historical samples collected from ten sentinel health districts, this study focused on three different years (2013, 2017, and 2018) marking the periods of shift between the main public health insecticides families (pyrethroids, carbamates, organophosphates) used in IRS to track back the evolutionary history of the resistance mutations on the Ace-1 and Gste2 loci. The results revealed the presence of four members of the Anopheles gambiae complex, with the predominance of An. arabiensis followed by An. gambiae, An. coluzzii, and An. gambiae–coluzzii hybrids. The Ace-1 mutation was only detected in An. gambiae and An. gambiae–coluzzii hybrids at low frequencies varying between 0.006 and 0.02, while the Gste2 mutation was found in all the species with a frequency ranging between 0.02 and 0.25. The Ace-1 and Gste2 genes were highly diversified with twenty-two and thirty-one different haplotypes, respectively. The neutrality tests on each gene indicated a negative Tajima’s D, suggesting the abundance of rare alleles. The presence and spread of the Ace-1 and Gste2 resistance mutations represent a serious threat to of the effectiveness and the sustainability of IRS-based interventions using carbamates or organophosphates to manage the widespread pyrethroids resistance in Senegal. These data are of the highest importance to support the NMCP for evidence-based vector control interventions selection and targeting.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The fight against malaria has made significant progress over the recent decades toward eliminating the disease [1]. This achievement was made possible by the scale-up of effective insecticide-based vector control interventions, such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), which led to the decrease of overall malaria cases by 70% [2,3]. However, the spread of insecticide resistance within the natural populations of major malaria vector to almost all the public health insecticides, resulting from widespread and uncontrolled use of pesticides both in the public health and agriculture sectors, threaten the sustainability of the gain and sustainability of current and future insecticide-based vector control interventions. However, the threat from increasing insecticide resistance can be effectively managed through a good insecticide management programme and the implementation of targeted and evidence-based vector control strategies. The two main resistance mechanisms underlying the insecticides resistance described so far involve target-site mutations and over-expression of metabolic enzymes detoxifying the insecticides.
The overexpression of the Gste2 family group of enzyme (Glutathione S-Transferase Epsilon 2) has been associated with organophosphate- and organochlorine-resistant insects strains [4,5]. This enzyme family has recently been implicated in the resistance of An. gambiae to pyrethroids [6]. Moreover, previous studies have reported 5–8-fold Gste2 over-expression in An. gambiae displaying phenotypic DDT resistance, while the voltage-gated sodium channel mutation was not detected [7,8]. The Gste2-I114T mutation (inducing the overexpression of the Gste2) associated with DDT and pyrethroid resistance in African malaria vectors has been reported in Benin, Burkina, Ghana, and Gambia [6,9,10,11]. In addition, reduced susceptibility of An. gambiae s.l. to organophosphate and carbamate insecticides was associated with a single amino-acid substitution of the glycine (GGC) by serine (AGC) at codon 119 (G119S) in the Ace-1 gene (Acetylcholinesterase 1) [12] and was reported from several West African countries, including Senegal, Benin, Burkina Faso, and Ivory Coast [13,14,15,16]. Moreover, at Ace-1 locus, there are homogeneous-duplication- and heterogeneous-duplications-resistant alleles, which enhances the resistance level against organophosphate-carbamate insecticides [17]. Both the above-mentioned mutations (G119S-Ace-1 and Gste2-I114T) were associated with organophosphate-carbamates cross-resistance currently used for IRS in many Sub-Saharan African countries, including Senegal.
To sustain standard LLINs (long-lasting insecticidal nets) only threated with pyrethroids, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the application of insecticides with different classes of insecticide with different modes of action mainly through IRS [3]. Therefore, the interest in using organophosphate for public health purposes increased [13,18,19] with widespread reports of their effectiveness against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes [20,21] and the beneficial impact of IRS with organophosphate in many African countries [22,23,24,25]. However, a concomitant presence of the Ace-1 and the Gste2 resistant alleles in the wild Anopheles populations might jeopardize the use of organophosphate insecticides for IRS to manage the wide spread of pyrethroids resistance.
In this study, we tracked back the presence and evolution of Ace-1 and Gste2 resistance genes in several Anopheles gambiae s.l. wild populations collected at different time points corresponding to shift periods from pyrethroids to carbamate and then organophosphate used for IRS in the selected health districts of Senegal.

2. Results

2.1. Ace-1 and Gste2 Resistant Allele Frequencies in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Senegal

A total of 1647 samples were screened for insecticide-resistance markers at Ace-1 and Gste2 loci from wild An. gambiae s.s., An. coluzzii, An. arabiensis, and An. gambiae-coluzzii hybrids populations across all the study sites.
The G119S mutation at Ace-1 locus was only found in An. gambiae s.s. and An. gambiae-coluzzii hybrids in the health districts of Velingara, Tambacounda, and Kedougou. The resistant allele frequency of the G119S mutation was 0.02, 0.03, and 0.06, respectively, in the An. gambiae s.s. population from Velingara, Tambacounda, and Kedougou. However, this frequency in An. gambiae s.s. was 0.04, 0.01, and 0.03, respectively, for the years 2013, 2017, and 2018, without a significant difference (p = 0.36). Moreover, in An. gambiae-coluzzii hybrids, the mutation was only found in Tambacounda in 2013, with an allele frequency of 0.13 (see Table 1 and Table 2).
The Gste2-I114T mutation was found in all four An. gambiae s.l. species (An. arabiensis, An. gambiae s.s., An. coluzzii, and An. gambiae-coluzzii hybrids). However, the mutation was the most frequent within the natural An. coluzzii population and found in eight study sites (except Ndoffane and Tambacounda) with a frequency varying between 0.14 in Koungheul and 0.58 in Velingara (see Table 3). The Gste2-I114T mutation was found in only three out of the ten study health districts for both An. arabiensis (allele frequency of 0.03, 0.03, and 0.18, respectively, from Tambacounda, Ndoffane, and Velingara) and An. gambiae s.s. (allele frequency of 0.16, 0.21, and 0.11, respectively, from Kedougou, Tambacounda, and Velingara). It was also found in An. gambiae-coluzzii hybrids only in Velingara and Nioro, with frequencies of 0.20 and 0.50, respectively.
Overall, the mean allele frequency of the Gste2-I114T allele was 0.02 ± 0.003 in An. arabiensis, 0.13 ± 0.15 in An. gambiae s.s., 0.25 ± 0.07 in An. coluzzii, and 0.20 ± 0.17 in An. gambiae-coluzzii hybrid (see Table 3). The mean allele frequency of Gste2-114T mutation was significantly higher in An. coluzzii and An. gambiae-coluzzii hybrid than in the other species (one-way ANOVA F = 5.14, p = 0.006). In addition, the mean of resistant allele frequency was 0.13, 0.06, and 0.1, respectively, for the years 2013, 2017, and 2018, without a clear temporal trend (one-way ANOVA F = 0.9, p = 0.47) as well as for species (see Table 4).

2.2. High Genetic and Haplotype Diversities at the Ace-1 Locus in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Senegal

Thirty-one samples, collected in 2017 and 2018, were successfully sequenced at the Ace-1 locus. The polymorphism of the partial sequence of 535 bp segment of the Ace-1 was analysed. The result revealed no gap, 518 monomorphic sites, and 17 polymorphic sites. Amongst the polymorphic sites, five were singletons with two-variable sites (at the positions 330, 333, 339, 369, and 513), while twelve were parsimony with eleven two-variable sites (at the positions 18, 25, 126, 129, 135, 144, 161, 240, 282, 367, and 495) and one three-variable site (at the position 321). The overall DNA polymorphism analysis with DnaSP revealed 22 haplotypes with a high haplotypic diversity of 0.908 and a low nucleotide diversity of 0.00474. Neutrality tests indicated a negative Tajima’s D = (−1.02860), suggesting the abundance of rare alleles with a recent selective sweep removing variation. In addition, the genetic differentiation between 2017 and 2018 was not significant (Chi2 = 25.054; p-value = 0.2448; df = 21) with strong hybridization between the two study years (Fst = 0.0053). However, a significant genetic differentiation was observed between all the study sites (Chi2 = 221.880; p-value = 0.05; df = 189) with a moderate gene flow (Fst = 0.13970) and between the three species (Chi2 = 73.558; p-value = 0.0019; df = 42) but with a limited gene flow (Fst = 0.158).
Furthermore, the signature of a putative selection was investigated to know the main haplotypes and their distribution amongst the An. gambiae s.l. species using Templeton, Crandall, and Sing (TCS) methods [26] in DnaSP and Network softwares. The haplotypes H2, H1 (found in all three species), H6, H12 (only detected in An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.s.), and H14 (only present in An. arabiensis) were the most frequent (Figure 1). The haplotypes H8, H9, and H22 were specific to An. gambiae s.s. and were the ones carrying the resistant allele at the Ace-1 gene (see Figure 1). Moreover, the haplotype diversity was high in all three species, with 0.92 in An. arabiensis, 0.78 in An. coluzzii, and 0.88 in An. gambiae s.s. (13, 8, and 7 haplotypes, respectively, Figure 1). Finally, the phylogenetic relationship inferred with the neighbour-joining method in MEGA revealed the presence of two main clades, with the major clade divided into two sub-clades (one consisting only of An. arabiensis and the second with all the species) and the second clade constituted only of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.s. (Figure 2).

2.3. High Genetic and Haplotype Diversities at Gste2 Locus in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Senegal

Twenty-four samples, collected in 2017 and 2018, were successfully sequenced for the Gste2 locus. The polymorphism analysis of the partial sequence of 459 bp showed 406 monomorphic sites, 4 gaps or missing data, and 49 variable or polymorphic sites. Amongst the variable sites, 27 were variable singletons, with 26 carrying two-variable sites and 1 harbouring three-variable sites, while 22 were parsimony informative sites (20 with two-variable sites and two with three-variable sites). The overall DNA polymorphism analysis revealed the presence of 31 haplotypes with a high haplotype diversity of 0.951 and a nucleotide diversity of 0.01661. Neutrality tests indicated a negative Tajima’s D (−1.23482), suggesting the abundance of rare alleles with a recent selective sweep. In addition, the genetic differentiation between 2017 and 2018 was not significant (Chi2 = 32.336; p-value = 0.35; df = 30), with strong hybridization between both years (Fst = −0.00197). Similarly, the genetic differentiation between all the study sites was not significant (Chi2 = 264.667; p-value = 0.1314; df = 240), while a significant gene flow (Fst = 0.249) was recorded between the sites (Fst = 0.165) and the three species (Chi2 = 75.674; p-value = 0.0835; df = 60).
In addition, the haplotype network was inferred to know the major haplotypes and their distribution amongst An. gambiae s.l. species using Templeton, Crandall, and Sing (TCS) methods [26] in DnaSP and Network softwares and revealed that the haplotype H1 is ubiquitous (found in all three species), while the H10 haplotype was only found in An. arabiensis and An. gambiae s.s. These two haplotypes were the most frequent (Figure 3). However, the haplotype H29 was only present in An. gambiae s.s., harbouring the homozygous resistant allele. Meanwhile the haplotype H1 (presents in all three species); the haplotypes H2, H3, H4, H15, H16, and H23 (only found in An. coluzzii); and the haplotypes H7, H30, and H31 (present only in An. arabiensis) were harbouring the heterozygous resistant allele. The remaining haplotypes harboured the homozygous susceptible genotype. The haplotypic diversity was high in all three species: 0.95 in An. arabiensis, 0.87 An. coluzzii, and 0.95 in An. gambiae s.s. (14, 12, and 8 haplotypes, respectively, see Figure 3), suggesting that Gste2 locus may also be a reservoir of novel genetic variants.
Moreover, the phylogenetic relationship inferred with the neighbour-joining method in MEGA revealed the presence of two main clades: the major clade is formed by all species, and a second clade is constituted only of An. arabiensis and An. gambiae s.s. (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

Insecticide resistance is a serious threat to vector control and could potentially jeopardize the malaria control gain obtained since 2000. Therefore, monitoring the evolution of genes involved in resistance is a major asset in insecticide-resistance management. Here, we studied the evolution of the mutations in the Ace-1 and Gste2 genes in An. gambiae s.l. populations collected from ten health districts of Senegal over three years, marking the main period of shift of insecticide molecules families used in IRS in Senegal from pyrethroids to carbamates and then organophosphates used in IRS. Indeed, as in several other African countries, carbamate and organophosphate are used as alternative chemical families for IRS to control malaria in areas where high pyrethroid resistance is confirmed [18,27]. However, given the increasing reports of the resistance to the two later insecticides amongst wild malaria vector populations across the African continent, it is critical to fully characterize all the underlying resistance mechanisms to preserve the limited vector control tools and avoid operational failure of carbamate/organophosphate-based interventions. In Senegal, targeted IRS has been implemented since 2007 in selected health districts through the PMI’s financial and technical support. The entomological surveillance to monitor the entomological parameters, including insecticide resistance, revealed resistance to carbamate in several An. gambiae s.l. populations [28,29].
This study revealed the presence of the Ace-1 mutation in An. gambiae s.l. population from the surveyed area of Senegal, thus confirming reports from previous studies in the country [16,30]. However, over the study period and area, the mutation was only found in Anopheles gambiae s.s and An. gambiae-coluzzii hybrids. The observed low frequency of the resistant allele might be related to the high fitness cost of the G119S-Ace-1 mutation [31]. The G119S mutation at Ace-1 locus was widely reported in several African countries, including Ghana, Gambia, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso, and Cameroon [10,32,33,34,35]. The origin of a mutation could be either by a de novo apparition amongst local An. gambiae s.s. populations or a genetic migration from neighbouring populations as previously described [35]. Our haplotype network result (see Figure 1) strongly supports the de novo apparition hypothesis. However, the haplotypes H8, H9, and H22 carrying the mutation were peripheral and likely evolved from the older and interior haplotype H2.
Moreover, agricultural selection pressure has been documented for carbamate resistance in An. gambiae populations across many West African countries [14,18]. Such a selection factor of the insecticide-resistance mechanism might be responsible for the observed G119S-Ace-1 mutation selection in Senegal, where carbamates are being used in agricultural activities [36]. In addition, the G119S-Ace-1 mutation induces resistance against organophosphates [12], which have been used recurrently in several IRS sites in Senegal. However, Senegal started implementing IRS in 2007 with financial and technical support from the U.S. President’s Malaria Initiative. IRS was conducted with different pyrethroid insecticides and formulations between 2007 and 2011. Then, the NMCP shifted to bendiocarb between 2011 and 2014 [37], following the evidence of increasing phenotypical resistance to pyrethroids, correlated with the increase of both the East and West kdr mutations. Finally, due to the low residual efficacy of bendiocarb, organophosphates were implemented since 2014 to replace it [38]. Both selection pressures (from agriculture and malaria mosquito control intervention) might have likely selected the G119S-Ace-1 mutation selection, which was found at low frequency across all three years of study. In this study, the G119S-Ace-1 mutation was first detected in 2013, and its frequency remained stable over the three selected years. The selection of G119S-Ace-1 mutation was likely through the use of the carbamate in the agricultural sector and then strengthened during the successive shift to carbamate and organophosphates for IRS implementation. Indeed, the G119S-Ace-1 mutation was mainly found in An. gambiae s.s. (see Table 1). This result suggests a species dependency linked with its bio-ecology favouring the selection of Ace-1 (G119S) mutation. However, in contrast with An. coluzzii, An. gambiae s.s. oviposit in temporary, small, rain-filled breeding sites [39]. Then, residual carbamate and organophosphate insecticides from pest control could quickly drain into the breeding site and contribute to the selection of resistant alleles at the Ace-1 locus.
In addition, the Ace-1 (G119S) mutation was identified as a heterozygote in most of the samples, suggesting the presence of heterogeneous duplication associated with low fitness cost [40]. However, we did not identify the known mixture of two nucleotides at a single position in those heterozygote samples sequenced except the G119S mutation one, which might suggest the presence of heterogeneous duplication [17]. Therefore, the samples carrying the mutation are the standard heterozygote with susceptible and resistant alleles of Ace-1 gene. Knowing that the resistant allele of Ace-1 gene is associated with deleterious fitness cost [17] strongly supports its low frequency observed in Senegal.
The result of the Gste2 genotyping showed the presence of the mutation in the studied An. gambiae s.l. populations for all the three years of study. To our best knowledge, this is the first report of the single mutation point conferring the metabolic resistance amongst wild An. gambiae s.l. in Senegal although it has been reported elsewhere in natural An. gambiae s.l. populations [7,9] and An. funestus [41,42,43]. Indeed, the mutation was widely reported in several African countries, such as the Gambia [32], Ghana [10], Benin [44], Burkina [45], Cameroon [46], and Kenya [47]. However, the allelic frequency of the resistant allele recorded during this study was relatively low compared to those reported in Benin [48] and Cameroon [46] while being consistent with the previous record in Kenya [46]. In Benin and Cameroon, the high allele frequencies may be explained by the fixation of the mutation in the mosquito population, which is not the case in the population studied here. Furthermore, the presence of the Gste2 mutation was correlated with the resistance to DDT in northern and southern Benin [44] in both An. gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus populations from Benin [48]. Nevertheless, the resistant allele was likely selected during large-scale DDT use over the last decades [48]. Furthermore, the Gste2 allele could have been selected by the increase of the selection pressure exerted by the recent extensive use of pyrethroids, which metabolized by Gste2 enzyme. Pyrethroids are the unique chemical family recommended for use to impregnate LLINs, and their uncontrolled use in the agricultural sector was known in several areas [6,49].
The analysis of the sequencing data revealed high genetic and haplotypic diversities at Ace1 and Gste2 loci for the first time in Senegal using advanced sequencing approaches. The observed high genetic and haplotypic diversities at both loci suggest that they may also serve as a reservoir for new genetic variants at the early stage of the adaptive selection and evolution processes, as previously highlighted for Ace-1 locus in An. gambiae s.l. [35] and the Gste2 locus in the Anopheles funestus [40]. In contrast to this finding, low genetic diversity of the Gste2 gene was reported in Anopheles funestus in Benin [6]. However, additional genetic studies are needed to better understand the putative mechanisms underlying the Ace1- and Gste2-mediated resistances that could compromise the use of the carbamate and organophosphates as part of the insecticide management plan in vector control strategies in Senegal.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Study Area and Samples Collections

Historical samples of An. gambiae s.l. collected in 2013, 2017, and 2018 from ten entomological sentinel sites from Senegal (Figure 5) were used for this study. A random stratified sampling approach was used and drawn from an existing An. gambiae s.l. collection stored individually in silica gel at the Cheikh Anta Diop University to capture the spatial and temporal heterogeneities across the study area as much as possible. The selected health districts are located in the three main bioclimate zones accounting for almost 90% of the malaria transmission in Senegal [50].

4.2. Molecular Identification of An. gambiae s.l. Species and Genotyping of the Ace-1 and Gste2 Mutations

The genomic DNA was extracted from individuals using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue QIAcube kit following the manufacturer’s protocol. The An. gambiae s.l. sibling species were identified as described by Scott [51] and Fanelo [52]. The Ace-1 and Gste2 mutations were genotyped as previously described [6,53].

4.3. Partial Sequences of Ace-1 and Gste2 Genes

An 817 bp fragment of the Ace-1 gene was amplified using the Ex2Agdir1 (5′-AGGTCACGGTGAGTCCGTACGA-3′) and Ex4Agrev2 (5′-AGGGCGGACAGCAGATGCAGCGA-3′) pair of primers [39]. Moreover, a 748 bp fragment of Gste2 was amplified using AgGste2F1 (5-GTACACCCTGCACCTTAGCC-3′) and AgGste2R1 (5-CCGTTCGCTTCCTCGTAGT-A-3′) pair of primers. The PCR conditions were set as described in Diallo et al. [50], with a slight modification.
The PCR products were purified using Ampure xp beads (Beckman Coulter A63881) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. All the products were normalised to 20 ng, using 10 ng as a template (based on Thermofisher’s recommendations for fragment sizes between 500 bp–1 kb). Then, the forward and the reverse strands were amplified separately using the ready mix of the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit V3.1. The sequencing reaction products were purified with Agencourt CleanSEQ (Ref A29151) before transferring to the ABI SeqStudio automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems) for sequencing.

4.4. Data Analysis

The mutation frequencies were compared between sites and years using ANOVA at the significance level of 5%. The obtained sequences were confirmed using BioEdit v.7.2.1 and then aligned using the ClustalW [54]. Estimates of DNA polymorphism, including the number of segregating sites, number of haplotypes, haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity, Tajima’s D, genetic differentiation, and gene flow between populations, were inferred using DnaSP v.5.10 [55]. The species relationship amongst haplotypes was estimated by constructing the haplotype network with Network v.10.2.0.0 software version [56], and the neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree was inferred using the MEGA v.7.0 program version [57] using the cleaned sequences aligned with reference sequences (accession numbers AGAP001356 for Ace1 and AGAP009194 for Gste2) retrieved from VectorBase.

5. Conclusions

The present study is the first one highlighting the occurrence of the Ace1 target-site resistance and Gste2 metabolic mutation in the malaria vector population from Senegal. Although both mutations were found at low frequency, their spread is a serious concern for the future of the vector control strategies in Senegal. The evolution of insecticide resistance could negatively impact the effectiveness of all carbamate/organophosphates-based strategies, which are being used as a replacement for pyrethroid insecticides for managing the increasing resistances in the malaria vector across Senegal. Additional studies are required to better monitor the distribution and evolution of these two mutations and their association with the reported phenotypic resistance to preserve the limited insecticide-based vector control tools and ensure the sustainability of the gain achieved so far through the scale-up of proven-effective vector control strategies. However, the preliminary data generated from this study could be used by the NMPC to better guide and target vector control interventions across the country as part of their evidence-based vector control decision-making process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; data curation, M.D., E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; formal analysis, M.D., P.C.S., E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; funding acquisition, O.G., E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; investigation, M.D., M.A.O., A.K.D., J.M., E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; methodology, M.D., E.S.M.K., F.S., E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; project administration, E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; resources, A.K.D., B.S., E.H.A.N., O.F., S.M.D. and L.K.; supervision, E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; validation, E.H.A.N. and B.S.A.; writing—original draft, M.D. and B.S.A.; writing—review and editing, E.S.M.K., O.S., F.S., P.C.S., A.K.D., B.S., O.F., L.K., O.G., A.K.S., E.H.A.N. and B.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported through the sub-award from the West African Network for TB, AIDS, and Malaria (WANETAM2/EDCTP-RegNet2015-1049). The samples used for this study were collected with financial support of The President’s Malaria Initiative (US-PMI) and Senegal National Malaria Control Programme. B.S.A. was supported by DELTAS Africa Initiative grant DEL-15-010 of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS)’s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and the Crick African Network, which receives its funding from the UK’s Global Challenges Research Fund (MR/P028071/1). E.H.A.N. was supported by the Wellcome Trust Training Fellowship in Public Health and Tropical Medicine (206742/Z/17/Z).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. Raw data will be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that they have no competing financial and non-financial interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2021; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhatt, S.; Weiss, D.J.; Cameron, E.; Bisanzio, D.; Mappin, B.; Dalrymple, U.; Battle, K.E.; Moyes, C.L.; Henry, A.; Eckhoff, P.A.; et al. The Effect of Malaria Control on Plasmodium Falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature 2015, 526, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. Who Indoor Residual Spraying: An Operational Manual for Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) for Malaria Transmission Control and Elimination; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fournier, D.; Bride, J.M.; Poirie, M.; Bergé, J.B.; Plapp, F.W. Insect Glutathione S-Transferases. Biochemical Characteristics of the Major Forms from Houseflies Susceptible and Resistant to Insecticides. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 1840–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Djègbè, I.; Agossa, F.R.; Jones, C.M.; Poupardin, R.; Cornelie, S.; Akogbéto, M.; Ranson, H.; Corbel, V. Molecular Characterization of DDT Resistance in Anopheles gambiae from Benin. Parasit. Vectors 2014, 7, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Riveron, J.M.; Yunta, C.; Ibrahim, S.S.; Djouaka, R.; Irving, H.; Menze, B.D.; Ismail, H.M.; Hemingway, J.; Ranson, H.; Albert, A.; et al. A Single Mutation in the GSTe2 Gene Allows Tracking of Metabolically Based Insecticide Resistance in a Major Malaria Vector. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ranson, H.; Rossiter, L.; Ortelli, F.; Jensen, B.; Wang, X.; Roth, C.W.; Collins, F.H.; Hemingway, J. Identification of a Novel Class of Insect Glutathione S-Transferases Involved in Resistance to DDT in the Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae. Biochem. J. 2001, 359, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ding, Y.; Hawkes, N.; Meredith, J.; Eggleston, P.; Hemingway, J.; Ranson, H. Characterization of the Promoters of Epsilon Glutathione Transferases in the Mosquito Anopheles gambiae and Their Response to Oxidative Stress. Biochem. J. 2005, 387, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mitchell, S.N.; Rigden, D.J.; Dowd, A.J.; Lu, F.; Wilding, C.S.; Weetman, D.; Dadzie, S.; Jenkins, A.M.; Regna, K.; Boko, P.; et al. Metabolic and Target-Site Mechanisms Combine to Confer Strong DDT Resistance in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hamid-Adiamoh, M.; Amambua-Ngwa, A.; Nwakanma, D.; D’Alessandro, U.; Awandare, G.A.; Afrane, Y.A. Insecticide Resistance in Indoor and Outdoor-Resting Anopheles gambiae in Northern Ghana. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hamid-Adiamoh, M.; Nwakanma, D.; Assogba, B.S.; Ndiath, M.O.; D’Alessandro, U.; Afrane, Y.A.; Amambua-Ngwa, A. Influence of Insecticide Resistance on the Biting and Resting Preferences of Malaria Vectors in the Gambia. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0241023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Weill, M.; Malcolm, C.; Chandre, F.; Mogensen, K.; Berthomieu, A.; Marquine, M.; Raymond, M. The Unique Mutation in Ace-1 Giving High Insecticide Resistance Is Easily Detectable in Mosquito Vectors. Insect Mol. Biol. 2004, 13, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aïzoun, N.; Aïkpon, R.; Gnanguenon, V.; Oussou, O.; Agossa, F.; Padonou, G.G.; Akogbéto, M. Status of Organophosphate and Carbamate Resistance in Anopheles gambiae Sensu Lato from the South and North Benin, West Africa. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dabiré, R.K.; Namountougou, M.; Diabaté, A.; Soma, D.D.; Bado, J.; Toé, H.K.; Bass, C.; Combary, P. Distribution and Frequency of Kdr Mutations within Anopheles gambiae s.l. Populations and First Report of the Ace.1G119S Mutation in Anopheles arabiensis from Burkina Faso (West Africa). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Oumbouke, W.A.; Pignatelli, P.; Barreaux, A.M.G.; Tia, I.Z.; Koffi, A.A.; Ahoua Alou, L.P.; Sternberg, E.D.; Thomas, M.B.; Weetman, D.; N’Guessan, R. Fine Scale Spatial Investigation of Multiple Insecticide Resistance and Underlying Target-Site and Metabolic Mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae in Central Côte d’Ivoire. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sy, O.; Sarr, P.C.; Assogba, B.S.; Ndiaye, M.; Dia, A.K.; Ndiaye, A.; Nourdine, M.A.; Guèye, O.K.; Konaté, L.; Gaye, O.; et al. Detection of Kdr and Ace-1 Mutations in Wild Populations of Anopheles arabiensis and An. melas in a Residual Malaria Transmission Area of Senegal. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 173, 104783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Assogba, B.S.; Milesi, P.; Djogbénou, L.S.; Berthomieu, A.; Makoundou, P.; Baba-Moussa, L.S.; Fiston-Lavier, A.-S.; Belkhir, K.; Labbé, P.; Weill, M. The Ace-1 Locus Is Amplified in All Resistant Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes: Fitness Consequences of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Duplications. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e2000618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Akogbéto, M.C.; Padonou, G.G.; Gbénou, D.; Irish, S.; Yadouleton, A. Bendiocarb, a Potential Alternative against Pyrethroid Resistant Anopheles gambiae in Benin, West Africa. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yewhalaw, D.; Balkew, M.; Shililu, J.; Suleman, S.; Getachew, A.; Ashenbo, G.; Chibsa, S.; Dissanayake, G.; George, K.; Dengela, D.; et al. Determination of the Residual Efficacy of Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Used for Indoor Residual Spraying for Malaria Control in Ethiopia. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agossa, F.R.; Aikpon, R.; Azondekon, R.; Govoetchan, R.; Padonou, G.G.; Oussou, O.; Oke-Agbo, F.; Akogbeto, M.C. Efficacy of Various Insecticides Recommended for Indoor Residual Spraying: Pirimiphos Methyl, Potential Alternative to Bendiocarb for Pyrethroid Resistance Management in Benin, West Africa. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 108, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. N’Guessan, R.; Boko, P.; Odjo, A.; Chabi, J.; Akogbeto, M.; Rowland, M. Control of Pyrethroid and DDT-Resistant Anopheles gambiae by Application of Indoor Residual Spraying or Mosquito Nets Treated with a Long-Lasting Organophosphate Insecticide, Chlorpyrifos-Methyl. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sharp, B.L.; Ridl, F.C.; Govender, D.; Kuklinski, J.; Kleinschmidt, I. Malaria Vector Control by Indoor Residual Insecticide Spraying on the Tropical Island of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea. Malar. J. 2007, 6, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Akogbeto, M.; Gbedjissi, G.L.; Padonou, G.G.; Gazard, D.K.; Bankole, H.S. Dramatic Decrease in Malaria Transmission after Large-Scale Indoor Residual Spraying with Bendiocarb in Benin, an Area of High Resistance of Anopheles gambiae to Pyrethroids. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yeebiyo, Y.; Dengela, D.; Tesfaye, A.G.; Anshebo, G.Y.; Kolyada, L.; Wirtz, R.; Chibsa, S.; Fornadel, C.; George, K.; Belemvire, A.; et al. Short Persistence of Bendiocarb Sprayed on Pervious Walls and Its Implication for the Indoor Residual Spray Program in Ethiopia. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tangena, J.-A.A.; Hendriks, C.M.J.; Devine, M.; Tammaro, M.; Trett, A.E.; Williams, I.; DePina, A.J.; Sisay, A.; Herizo, R.; Kafy, H.T.; et al. Indoor Residual Spraying for Malaria Control in Sub-Saharan Africa 1997 to 2017: An Adjusted Retrospective Analysis. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Templeton, A.R.; Crandall, K.A.; Sing, C.F. A Cladistic Analysis of Phenotypic AssociationsWith Haplotypes Inferred From Restriction Endonuclease Mapping and DNA Sequence Data. III. Cladogram Estimation. Genet. Soc. Am. 1992, 132, 619–633. [Google Scholar]
  27. World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Western Pacific. Strategy for Malaria Elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion: 2015–2030; WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific: Manila, Philippines, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  28. Essandoh, J.; Yawson, A.E.; Weetman, D. Acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1) Target Site Mutation 119S Is Strongly Diagnostic of Carbamate and Organophosphate Resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles coluzzii across Southern Ghana. Malar. J. 2013, 12, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aïkpon, R.; Agossa, F.; Ossè, R.; Oussou, O.; Aïzoun, N.; Oké-Agbo, F.; Akogbéto, M. Bendiocarb Resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. Populations from Atacora Department in Benin, West Africa: A Threat for Malaria Vector Control. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Diouf, E.H.; Niang, E.H.A.; Samb, B.; Diagne, C.T.; Diouf, M.; Konaté, A.; Dia, I.; Faye, O.; Konaté, L. Multiple Insecticide Resistance Target Sites in Adult Field Strains of An. gambiae (s.l.) from Southeastern Senegal. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Djogbénou, L.; Noel, V.; Agnew, P. Costs of Insensitive Acetylcholinesterase Insecticide Resistance for the Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae Homozygous for the G119S Mutation. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Opondo, K.O.; Weetman, D.; Jawara, M.; Diatta, M.; Fofana, A.; Crombe, F.; Mwesigwa, J.; D’Alessandro, U.; Donnelly, M.J. Does Insecticide Resistance Contribute to Heterogeneities in Malaria Transmission in The Gambia? Malar. J. 2016, 15, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alou, L.P.A.; Koffi, A.A.; Adja, M.A.; Tia, E.; Kouassi, P.K.; Koné, M.; Chandre, F. Distribution of Ace-1R and resistance to carbamates and organophosphates in Anopheles gambiae s.s. populations from Côte d’Ivoire. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dabiré, K.R.; Diabaté, A.; Namontougou, M.; Djogbenou, L.; Kengne, P.; Simard, F.; Bass, C.; Baldet, T. Distribution of Insensitive Acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1R) in Anopheles gambiae s.l. Populations from Burkina Faso (West Africa). Trop. Med. Int. Health 2009, 14, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Elanga-Ndille, E.; Nouage, L.; Ndo, C.; Binyang, A.; Assatse, T.; Nguiffo-Nguete, D.; Djonabaye, D.; Irwing, H.; Tene-Fossog, B.; Wondji, C.S. The G119S Acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1) Target Site Mutation Confers Carbamate Resistance in the Major Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon: A Challenge for the Coming IRS Implementation. Genes 2019, 10, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Diop, A.; Diop, Y.M.; Sarr, S.O.; Ndiaye, B.; Gueye, R.; Thiam, K.; Cazier, F.; Delattre, F. Pesticide Contamination of Soil and Groundwater in the Vulnerable Agricultural Zone of the Niayes (Dakar, Senegal). Anal. Chem. Lett. 2019, 9, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lo, C.; Dia, A.K.; Dia, I.; Niang, E.H.A.; Konaté, L.; Faye, O. Evaluation of the Residual Efficacy of Indoor Residual Spraying with Bendiocarb (FICAM WP 80) in Six Health Districts in Senegal. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sy, O.; Niang, E.H.A.; Ndiaye, M.; Konaté, L.; Diallo, A.; Ba, E.C.C.; Tairou, F.; Diouf, E.; Cissé, B.; Gaye, O.; et al. Entomological Impact of Indoor Residual Spraying with Pirimiphos-Methyl: A Pilot Study in an Area of Low Malaria Transmission in Senegal. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gimonneau, G.; Pombi, M.; Choisy, M.; Morand, S.; Dabiré, R.K.; Simard, F. Larval Habitat Segregation between the Molecular Forms of the Mosquito Anopheles gambiae in a Rice Field Area of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2012, 26, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tchouakui, M.; Chiang, M.-C.; Ndo, C.; Kuicheu, C.K.; Amvongo-Adjia, N.; Wondji, M.J.; Tchoupo, M.; Kusimo, M.O.; Riveron, J.M.; Wondji, C.S. A Marker of Glutathione S-Transferase-Mediated Resistance to Insecticides Is Associated with Higher Plasmodium Infection in the African Malaria Vector Anopheles funestus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Djouaka, R.; Riveron, J.M.; Yessoufou, A.; Tchigossou, G.; Akoton, R.; Irving, H.; Djegbe, I.; Moutairou, K.; Adeoti, R.; Tamò, M.; et al. Multiple Insecticide Resistance in an Infected Population of the Malaria Vector Anopheles funestus in Benin. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tchakounte, A.; Tchouakui, M.; Mu-Chun, C.; Tchapga, W.; Kopia, E.; Soh, P.T.; Njiokou, F.; Riveron, J.M.; Wondji, C.S. Exposure to the Insecticide-Treated Bednet PermaNet 2.0 Reduces the Longevity of the Wild African Malaria Vector Anopheles funestus but GSTe2-Resistant Mosquitoes Live Longer. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213949. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tchigossou, G.M.; Atoyebi, S.M.; Akoton, R.; Tossou, E.; Innocent, D.; Riveron, J.; Irving, H.; Yessoufou, A.; Wondji, C.; Djouaka, R. Investigation of DDT Resistance Mechanisms in Anopheles funestus Populations from Northern and Southern Benin Reveals a Key Role of the GSTe2 Gene. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Williams, J.; Ingham, V.A.; Morris, M.; Toé, K.H.; Hien, A.S.; Morgan, J.C.; Dabiré, R.K.; Guelbéogo, W.M.; Sagnon, N.; Ranson, H. Sympatric Populations of the Anopheles gambiae Complex in Southwest Burkina Faso Evolve Multiple Diverse Resistance Mechanisms in Response to Intense Selection Pressure with Pyrethroids. Insects 2022, 13, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Amvongo-Adjia, N.; Riveron, J.M.; Njiokou, F.; Wanji, S.; Wondji, C.S. Influence of a Major Mountainous Landscape Barrier (Mount Cameroon) on the Spread of Metabolic (GSTe2) and Target-Site (Rdl) Resistance Alleles in the African Malaria Vector Anopheles funestus. Genes 2020, 11, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kinya, F.; Mutero, C.M.; Sang, R.; Owino, E.A.; Rotich, G.; Ogola, E.O.; Wondji, C.S.; Torto, B.; Tchouassi, D.P. Outdoor Malaria Vector Species Profile in Dryland Ecosystems of Kenya. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Corbel, V.; N’Guessan, R.; Brengues, C.; Chandre, F.; Djogbenou, L.; Martin, T.; Akogbéto, M.; Hougard, J.M.; Rowland, M. Multiple Insecticide Resistance Mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Trop. 2007, 101, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Antonio-Nkondjio, C.; Sonhafouo-Chiana, N.; Ngadjeu, C.S.; Doumbe-Belisse, P.; Talipouo, A.; Djamouko-Djonkam, L.; Kopya, E.; Bamou, R.; Awono-Ambene, P.; Wondji, C.S. Review of the Evolution of Insecticide Resistance in Main Malaria Vectors in Cameroon from 1990 to 2017. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lucas, E.R.; Rockett, K.A.; Lynd, A.; Essandoh, J.; Grisales, N.; Kemei, B.; Njoroge, H.; Hubbart, C.; Rippon, E.J.; Morgan, J.; et al. A High Throughput Multi-Locus Insecticide Resistance Marker Panel for Tracking Resistance Emergence and Spread in Anopheles gambiae. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Diallo, M.; Hamid-Adiamoh, M.; Sy, O.; Sarr, P.C.; Manneh, J.; Ndiath, M.O.; Gaye, O.; Faye, O.; Konaté, L.; Sesay, A.K.; et al. Evolution of the Pyrethroids Target-Site Resistance Mechanisms in Senegal: Early Stage of the Vgsc-1014F and Vgsc-1014S Allelic Frequencies Shift. Genes 2021, 12, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Scott, J.A.; Brogdon, W.G.; Collins, F.H. Identification of Single Specimens of the Anopheles gambiae Complex by the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1993, 49, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fanello, C.; Santolamazza, F.D.; Della Torre, A. Simultaneous Identification of Species and Molecular Forms of the Anopheles gambiae Complex by PCR-RFLP. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2002, 16, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bass, C.; Nikou, D.; Vontas, J.; Williamson, M.S.; Field, L.M. Development of High-Throughput Real-Time PCR Assays for the Identification of Insensitive Acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1R) in Anopheles gambiae. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 96, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  55. Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A Software for Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Polymorphism Data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bandelt, H.-J.; Dress, A.W. Split Decomposition: A New and Useful Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis of Distance Data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1992, 1, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolution Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Pathogens 11 01021 g001 550
Figure 1. Haplotype diversity at Ace-1 gene in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Senegal. The circle size represents the frequency of the haplotype; the number in red corresponds to the position of the mutation; the small, red circles represent missing haplotypes that were not observed.
Figure 1. Haplotype diversity at Ace-1 gene in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Senegal. The circle size represents the frequency of the haplotype; the number in red corresponds to the position of the mutation; the small, red circles represent missing haplotypes that were not observed.
Pathogens 11 01021 g001
Pathogens 11 01021 g002 550
Figure 2. Evolutionary relationships of taxa using neighbour-joining method at Ace-1 locus between the Anopheles gambiae s.l. species from Senegal. The red numbers represent the confidence estimate value. Study sites: Kf, Kaffrine; TH, Thiés; Kgl, Koungheul; Kdg, Kédougou; Nd, Ndoffane; Vl, Vélingara; Mh, Malém Hoddar; Kp, Koumpentoum; NI, Nioro; Tb, Tambacounda. Genotypes at Ace-1 locus: gg, homozygote susceptible; gs, heterozygote resistance. Species: ar, ag, and ac correspond, respectively, to An. arabiensis, An. gambiae s.s., and An. coluzzii. The numbers 13, 17, and 18 correspond to the study years (2013, 2017 and 2018 respectively).
Figure 2. Evolutionary relationships of taxa using neighbour-joining method at Ace-1 locus between the Anopheles gambiae s.l. species from Senegal. The red numbers represent the confidence estimate value. Study sites: Kf, Kaffrine; TH, Thiés; Kgl, Koungheul; Kdg, Kédougou; Nd, Ndoffane; Vl, Vélingara; Mh, Malém Hoddar; Kp, Koumpentoum; NI, Nioro; Tb, Tambacounda. Genotypes at Ace-1 locus: gg, homozygote susceptible; gs, heterozygote resistance. Species: ar, ag, and ac correspond, respectively, to An. arabiensis, An. gambiae s.s., and An. coluzzii. The numbers 13, 17, and 18 correspond to the study years (2013, 2017 and 2018 respectively).
Pathogens 11 01021 g002
Pathogens 11 01021 g003 550
Figure 3. Haplotype diversity of Gste2 gene in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Senegal. The circle size represents the haplotype frequency; the red number corresponds to the position of the mutations; the small, red circles represent missing haplotypes that were not observed.
Figure 3. Haplotype diversity of Gste2 gene in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Senegal. The circle size represents the haplotype frequency; the red number corresponds to the position of the mutations; the small, red circles represent missing haplotypes that were not observed.
Pathogens 11 01021 g003
Pathogens 11 01021 g004 550
Figure 4. Evolutionary relationships of taxa using neighbour-joining method at Gste2 locus between the Anopheles gambiae s.l. species from Senegal. The red numbers represent the confidence estimate value. Study sites: Kf, Kaffrine; Th, Thiés; Kgl, Koungheul; Kdg, Kédougou; Nd, Ndoffane; Vl, Vélingara; Mh, Malém Hoddar; Kp, Koumpentoum; NI, Nioro; Tb, Tambacounda. Genotypes at Gste2 locus: gg, homozygote susceptible; gs, heterozygote resistance. Species: ar, ag, and ac correspond, respectively, to An. arabiensis, An. gambiae s.s., and An. coluzzii. The numbers 13, 17, and 18 correspond to the study years (2013, 2017, and 2018, respectively).
Figure 4. Evolutionary relationships of taxa using neighbour-joining method at Gste2 locus between the Anopheles gambiae s.l. species from Senegal. The red numbers represent the confidence estimate value. Study sites: Kf, Kaffrine; Th, Thiés; Kgl, Koungheul; Kdg, Kédougou; Nd, Ndoffane; Vl, Vélingara; Mh, Malém Hoddar; Kp, Koumpentoum; NI, Nioro; Tb, Tambacounda. Genotypes at Gste2 locus: gg, homozygote susceptible; gs, heterozygote resistance. Species: ar, ag, and ac correspond, respectively, to An. arabiensis, An. gambiae s.s., and An. coluzzii. The numbers 13, 17, and 18 correspond to the study years (2013, 2017, and 2018, respectively).
Pathogens 11 01021 g004
Pathogens 11 01021 g005 550
Figure 5. Geographical distribution of the study Health districts and insecticides used.
Figure 5. Geographical distribution of the study Health districts and insecticides used.
Pathogens 11 01021 g005
Table
Table 1. Genotypes and resistant allele frequencies of G119S-Ace-1 mutation in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from 10 Senegalese health districts.
Table 1. Genotypes and resistant allele frequencies of G119S-Ace-1 mutation in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from 10 Senegalese health districts.
Genotypes Frequency (S)
SpeciesLocalityNGGGSSS GS
ARKaffrine878700 10
Kedougou4400 10
Koumpentoum898900 10
Koungheul656500 10
Malem_Hodar10310300 10
Ndoffane999900 10
Nioro707000 10
Tambacounda646400 10
Thies11311300 10
Velingara545400 10
Total74874800 10
ACKaffrine161600 10
Kedougou4400 10
Koumpentoum141400 10
Koungheul383800 10
Malem_Hodar6600 10
Ndoffane5500 10
Nioro121200 10
Tambacounda4400 10
Thies3300 10
Velingara111100 10
Total11311300 10
AGKedougou444031 0.940.06
Koumpentoum6600 10
Malem_Hodar1100 10
Nioro191900 10
Tambacounda353320 0.970.03
Thies141400 10
Velingara222110 0.980.02
Total14113461 0.970.03
AC-AGNioro2200 10
Tambacounda5410 0.90.1
Thies1100 10
Velingara2200 10
Total10910 0.950.05
GG, glycine homozygous; SS, serine homozygous resistant; GS, glycine–serine heterozygous; AR, An. arabiensis; AG, An. gambiae s.s.; AC, An. coluzzii; AC-AG, coluzzii-gambiae hybrids; N, number of specimens tested per health district.
Table
Table 2. Genotypes and resistant alleles frequencies at the Ace-1 gene in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from three different sampling years.
Table 2. Genotypes and resistant alleles frequencies at the Ace-1 gene in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from three different sampling years.
Genotypes Frequency (S)
YearsSpeciesNGGGSSS GS
2013AR353500 10
AC4400 10
AG242220 0.960.042
AC-AG4310 0.880.125
Total676430 0.980.022
2017AR34834800 10
AC434300 10
AG373610 0.990.01
AC-AG4400 10
Total43243110 0.9990.001
2018AR36536500 10
AC666600 10
AG807631 0.970.03
AC-AG2200 10
Total51350931 0.9950.005
Table
Table 3. Genotypes and resistant allele frequencies at Gste2 in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from 10 Senegalese health districts.
Table 3. Genotypes and resistant allele frequencies at Gste2 in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from 10 Senegalese health districts.
SpeciesLocality Genotypes Frequency (S)
NRRRSSS RS
ARKaffrine490049 01
Kedougou3003 01
Koumpentoum580058 01
Koungheul400040 01
Malem_Hodar580058 01
Ndoffane371036 0.030.97
Nioro320032 01
Tambacounda401039 0.030.97
Thies340034 01
Velingara345227 0.180.82
Total38572376 0.020.98
ACKaffrine152310 0.230.77
Kedougou4022 0.250.75
Koumpentoum13508 0.380.62
Koungheul365031 0.140.86
Malem_Hodar7115 0.210.79
Ndoffane2002 01
Nioro11308 0.270.73
Tambacounda3003 01
Thies2011 0.250.75
Velingara13715 0.580.42
Total10623875 0.250.75
AGKedougou537343 0.160.84
Koumpentoum5005 01
Malem_Hodar1001 01
Nioro190019 01
Tambacounda357127 0.210.79
Thies7007 01
Velingara141112 0.110.89
Total134155114 0.130.87
AC-AGNioro2101 0.50.5
Tambacounda3003 01
Velingara5023 0.20.8
Total10127 0.20.8
RR, homozygous resistant; SS, homozygous susceptible; RS, heterozygous; AR, An. arabiensis; AG, An. gambiae s.s.; AC, An. coluzzii; AC-AG, coluzzii-gambiae hybrids; N, number of specimens tested per health district.
Table
Table 4. Genotypes and resistant alleles frequencies at Gste2 in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from three different sampling years.
Table 4. Genotypes and resistant alleles frequencies at Gste2 in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from three different sampling years.
Genotypes Frequency (S)
YearsSpeciesNRRRSSS RS
2013AR170017 01
AC4013 0.130.88
AG235117 0.240.76
AC-AG2002 01
Total465239 0.130.87
2017AR18801187 0.0030.997
AC4411429 0.300.70
AG372134 0.070.93
AC-AG7025 0.140.86
Total276138255 0.060.94
2018AR18071172 0.040.96
AC5812343 0.230.77
AG748363 0.130.87
AC-AG11 0 10
Total313287278 0.100.90
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diallo, M.; Kolley, E.S.; Dia, A.K.; Oboh, M.A.; Seck, F.; Manneh, J.; Sesay, A.K.; Diédhiou, S.M.; Sarr, P.C.; Sy, O.; et al. Evolution of the Ace-1 and Gste2 Mutations and Their Potential Impact on the Use of Carbamate and Organophosphates in IRS for Controlling Anopheles gambiae s.l., the Major Malaria Mosquito in Senegal. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091021

AMA Style

Diallo M, Kolley ES, Dia AK, Oboh MA, Seck F, Manneh J, Sesay AK, Diédhiou SM, Sarr PC, Sy O, et al. Evolution of the Ace-1 and Gste2 Mutations and Their Potential Impact on the Use of Carbamate and Organophosphates in IRS for Controlling Anopheles gambiae s.l., the Major Malaria Mosquito in Senegal. Pathogens. 2022; 11(9):1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diallo, Moussa, Ebrima SM Kolley, Abdoulaye Kane Dia, Mary Aigbiremo Oboh, Fatoumata Seck, Jarra Manneh, Abdul Karim Sesay, Seynabou Macote Diédhiou, Pape Cheikh Sarr, Ousmane Sy, and et al. 2022. "Evolution of the Ace-1 and Gste2 Mutations and Their Potential Impact on the Use of Carbamate and Organophosphates in IRS for Controlling Anopheles gambiae s.l., the Major Malaria Mosquito in Senegal" Pathogens 11, no. 9: 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091021

APA Style

Diallo, M., Kolley, E. S., Dia, A. K., Oboh, M. A., Seck, F., Manneh, J., Sesay, A. K., Diédhiou, S. M., Sarr, P. C., Sy, O., Samb, B., Gaye, O., Faye, O., Konaté, L., Assogba, B. S., & Niang, E. H. A. (2022). Evolution of the Ace-1 and Gste2 Mutations and Their Potential Impact on the Use of Carbamate and Organophosphates in IRS for Controlling Anopheles gambiae s.l., the Major Malaria Mosquito in Senegal. Pathogens, 11(9), 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop