Next Article in Journal
Food Safety Issues Related to Eating In and Eating Out
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of mecA, mecC and Panton-Valentine-Leukocidin Genes in Clinical Isolates of Coagulase Positive Staphylococci from Dermatological Canine Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic Characteristics of Porcine LA-MRSA CC398 and CC9 Isolates from Germany and China via Biolog Phenotype MicroArrayTM
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/microorganisms10112117
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Bovine Mastitis and Bulk Tank Milk: First Isolation of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Japan

by
Ryota Miyazawa
1,†,
So Shimoda
1,†,
Keiichi Matsuda
2,
Ryuta Tobe
1,
Tasuke Ando
1 and
Hiroshi Yoneyama
1,*
1
Laboratory of Animal Microbiology, Department of Animal Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1, Aramaki Aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8572, Miyagi, Japan
2
Livestock Medicine Training Center, Miyagi Prefecture Agricultural Mutual Aid Association, 39-4, Oohira Hirabayashi, Oohira-Village, Kurokawagun 981-3602, Miyagi, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(11), 2117; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112117
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 23 October 2022 / Accepted: 24 October 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Domestic Animals and Wildlife Zoonotic Microorganisms)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most important pathogens in humans as well as in livestock. Particularly, bovine mastitis caused by S. aureus is a serious issue in dairy farms due to disease recurrence. Here, cases of S. aureus-mediated intramammary infection occurring in the Miyagi Prefecture in Japan were monitored from May 2015 to August 2019; a total of 59 strains (49 from bovine milk and 10 from bulk milk) were obtained from 15 dairy farms and analyzed via sequence-based typing methods and antibiotic susceptibility tests. Two pairs of isolates were determined as recurrence cases from the same cows in distinct farms. The sequence type (ST), spa type, and coa type of each pair were the same: one pair showed ST705, t529, and VIb and the other showed ST352, t267, and VIc. In addition, the possession of toxin genes analyzed of each pair was exactly the same. Furthermore, seven oxacillin-sensitive clonal complex 398 isolates were obtained from a single farm. This is the first confirmed case of a Methicillin-Sensitive SA (MSSA) ST398 strain isolated from mastitis-containing cows in Japan. Our findings suggest that nationwide surveillance of the distribution of ST398 strains in dairy farms is important for managing human and animal health.

1. Introduction

Mastitis, an inflammatory response in the mammary gland primarily caused by bacteria, represents one of the most important diseases in the dairy industry [1], as it causes annual economic losses of over $2 billion in the United States [2] and £300 million in the United Kingdom alone [1]. In addition, mastitis affects not only animal welfare [1,3] but also human health as a result of increased antimicrobial use [4].
Mastitis control procedures such as appropriate milking procedures, teat disinfection after milking, segregation of infected animals, and prevention of the introduction of infected animals on farms have been developed. Nevertheless, antibiotic treatment remains an important and effective method for treating infections [1,5,6].
Among the mastitis-causing pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus, which infects the mammary gland, is one of the most important ones. The physiological characteristics of S. aureus make antibiotic treatment of bovine mastitis difficult because the bacterium survives after internalization in phagocytic cells [7,8] and forms intramammary biofilms [5], which may require repeated antibiotic therapy. The use of large amounts of antibiotics in the livestock industry can lead to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, among which methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) represents a major public health concern, as it shows resistance to many clinically important antibiotics [9,10]. Although the emergence of MRSA in a bovine mastitis case is infrequent [11], isolates with MRSA characteristics have been reported [12,13]. Accordingly, the information on the antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis cases is important.
S. aureus is a major human pathogen that can also cause an array of infections in various economically important livestock [9]. Owing to this pathological implication, a number of S. aureus isolates from various animals, including humans, have been biochemically and genetically characterized to determine their phylogenetic relationship; S. aureus strains have co-evolved with a single host species and adapted to colonize a specific host animal [7,9,14]. Recent genome sequencing-based approaches have further strengthened the phylogenetic relationships of various S. aureus strains isolated from different animals. Specifically, multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) analysis has shown that a specific sequence type (ST) and clonal complex (CC), which is a group of closely related STs, are associated with distinct animal hosts [5,9]. For example, S. aureus strains isolated from intramammary infections of ruminants mostly belong to CC97, CC133, CC130, CC126, and CC705 [5,9]. Additionally, most strains isolated from poultry and rabbit infections belong to ST5 and ST121, respectively [5,9].
S. aureus isolates produce various virulence factors, toxins, bacterial components that adhere to its host cells/tissues, and immune evasion molecules, which play an important role in their pathogenicity [10,15]. Bacterial surface factors are involved in the initial stages of the infection. The latex agglutination test is a convenient and widely used diagnostic test to confirm putative S. aureus isolates and to assess the presence of S. aureus virulence factors by detecting characteristics of their surface-anchored proteins [16].
The presence of MRSA strains in livestock represents a public health concern. In particular, the first isolation of MRSA strains from pigs, which belong to the ST398 genotype [17], has renewed the interest of researchers in livestock-associated S. aureus. Subsequently, MRSA strains belonging to the ST398 lineage have been isolated from calves and poultry [18,19]. As ST398 MRSA strains are known to have a wide host specificity, including humans [9], the surveillance of S. aureus strains isolated from livestock animals is important from a public health perspective; this is particularly true for Japan, as ST398 strains have not been isolated from cows so far [12]. In this study, we described the distribution of S. aureus strains isolated from cows between 2015 to 2019 using sequence-based typing methods, analyzed the isolates for their presence of various virulence factors by PCR and latex agglutination tests, and determined the susceptibility of the isolates to antibiotics. This study is the first to isolate methicillin-sensitive ST398 strains in Japan from a single farm out of 15 dairy farms surveyed in the central region of Miyagi Prefecture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

A total of 59 S. aureus strains were isolated from the milk of cows (Holstein) with mastitis (49 strains) and bulk milk (10 strains) that was collected from a combined milk of respective farm using an aseptic syringe by a licensed practicing veterinarian from Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, between June 2015 and August 2019. Milk samples (10 μL of individual mastitis cow milk and 50 μL of bulk milk) were spread on trypticase soy agar (1.5%, w/v) (TSA; Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo, Japan) with 5% sheep blood (Becton Dickinson Co., New Jersey, NY, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Peracute mastitis was diagnosed from integrated diagnostic symptoms of an individual cow that showed local symptoms (swelling and induration of udders) and systemic symptoms (high temperature, loss of forage intake, inadequate circulation, and difficulty in standing). Veterinarian diagnosis of all the collected milk was performed via the modified California mastitis test using a PL tester (Nippon Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Tokyo, Japan) and temperature measurement of individual cows. Isolates were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo, Japan) at 37 °C with shaking or on TSA at 37 °C aerobically. Procedures for handling cows conformed to the Basic Guidelines for the Research Use of Industrial Animals in Miyagi Prefecture Agricultural Mutual Aid Association. S. aureus ATCC29213 was used as a control strain in the MIC determination.

2.2. DNA Isolation

DNA was isolated from cells grown in TSB containing 3% (w/v) glycine by lysing the cells with acromopeptidase (Wako Pure Chemical Co., Osaka, Japan) and lysozyme (Wako Pure Chemical Co.) as described previously [20]. Briefly, cells (2 mL) at the mid-logarithmic growth phase were collected by centrifugation (16,100× g, 2 min, 23 °C) and suspended in a solution (300 μL) containing 0.3 M sucrose, 25 mM Tris-HCl, and 25 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). After centrifugation as above, cells were resuspended in 300 μL of the same solution. Subsequently, 50 μL of 2.4 mg/mL acromopeptidase dissolved in the same solution and 8 mg/mL lysozyme dissolved in the same solution were added to the cells to make final concentrations of 0.3 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL, respectively, and incubated at 37 °C overnight. The cells were then mixed with 100 μL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (final concentration, 2%) and incubated at 65 °C for 10 min, followed by extraction with a mixture of phenol and chloroform (1:1). An aqueous phase was then obtained by centrifugation (16,100× g, 5 min, 23 °C). After precipitation of DNA with 3 M sodium acetate (50 μL) and isopropanol (330 μL), the precipitate was washed with 70% ethanol, and the final air-dried DNA sample was dissolved in a solution (20 μL) containing 1 mM Tris-HCl and 0.1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0).

2.3. Genotyping of Isolates

An MLST analysis was performed as described previously [21]. Briefly, the gene fragments of arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqiL were amplified using specific primers (Supplementary Table S1), bacterial isolate DNA as the template, and TaKaRa EX Taq polymerase (Takara Bio Co., Shiga, Japan). The amplified products were purified using the FastGene Gel/PCR Extraction Kit (Nippon Genetics Co., Tokyo, Japan), and the nucleotide sequence was determined via the dideoxy chain termination method using a 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, WA, USA) [22]. Subsequently, the allele number and ST were determined from the S. aureus MLST website (https://pubmlst.org/saureus/ (accessed on 29 August 2022)). The spa typing was performed as described previously [23]. Briefly, the nucleotide sequence of spa in individual isolates was amplified using specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) and analyzed using Ridom SpaServer (https://www.spaserver.ridom.de/ (accessed on 22 August 2022)). Classification of the staphylocoagulase type was performed via multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), following a protocol described previously [24], using specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) to detect the coagulase gene (coa) type I to VIII and subtypes VIa, VIb, and VIc.

2.4. Detection of Toxin and Tetracycline Resistance Genes

The presence of four leucocidins, four hemolysins, 13 enterotoxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin genes was detected via PCR using specific primers (Supplementary Table S1), as described previously [25]. The presence of tetracycline resistance genes tetG, tetK, tetL, tetM, tetO, and tetS was determined via PCR analysis using specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) as previously described [26].

2.5. Latex Agglutination Test

A latex agglutination test was performed using the PS Latex Kit (Eiken Kagaku Co., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, individual isolates grown on TSA were suspended in approximately 50 μL of 0.85% NaCl on a glass slide, and then a drop of latex solution (approximately 50 μL) was added and gently mixed. Agglutination scores were determined as +++, ++, and + for agglutination observed within 20 s, 20–40 s, and 40–60 s, respectively.

2.6. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Determination

The MICs for ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefazolin, erythromycin, kanamycin, oxacillin, streptomycin, and tetracycline were determined via the agar dilution method following the standard protocols of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [27]. Briefly, each strain was grown at 37 °C overnight in Mueller Hinton broth (Beckton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) with shaking. Cells were then inoculated on Mueller Hinton agar medium (Beckton Dickinson, Sparks, USA) without or with 2% NaCl (for oxacillin) containing 2-fold serially diluted antibiotics by using a microplanter (Model MIT-P, Sakuma Co., Tokyo, Japan) (appropriately 104 CFU/spot). The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotics that inhibited the growth of the test strain after overnight incubation at 37 °C. We repeated the MIC determination at least twice for each antibiotic and obtained reproducible results.

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Typing of S. aureus Isolates

3.1.1. Sequence Type and Clonal Complex

A total of 59 S. aureus strains isolated from intramammary infection cases (49 strains) and bulk milk (10 strains) from 15 dairy farms were analyzed using the MLST (ST and CC), spa typing, and coa typing methods. The typing results (ST and CC), together with veterinarian diagnosis, are presented in Table 1.
A total of seven STs could be typed, among which eight isolates were found to not belong to any existing ST (as of September 2022); therefore, new STs denoted as NT1 and NT2 were described in this study. All strains were grouped into three CCs: CC97 (n = 28), CC705 (n = 24), and CC398 (n = 7). Notably, seven strains belonging to CC398 were isolated: they were repeatedly isolated from June 2015 to May 2019 on a specific farm (farm B). Among them, one strain belonged to ST4898, which has recently been isolated in the Czech Republic (Jolley et al. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 3:124 [version 1; referees: 2 approved]) [28].

3.1.2. spa Type

The spa typing analysis revealed six different spa types: t267 (19 strains), t359 (5 strains), t529 (22 strains), t865 (1 strain), t1201 (5 strains), and t3934 (7 strains) (Table 1). When a combination of CC and spa typing was evaluated, the majority of the CC705 strains (21 out of 24 strains) belonged to t529 (Table 2). However, results of the spa typing of CC97 strains tended to vary. All CC398 strains showed the same spa type, t3934 (Table 2).

3.1.3. coa Type

The staphylocoagulase type of the 59 isolates was classified based on differences in the nucleotide sequence of coa via a multiplex PCR method [20]. All isolates were assigned to three coa types: VIb (22 strains), VIc (30 strains), and VII (seven strains) (Table 1).

3.2. Characterization of S. aureus Isolates

3.2.1. Leucocidins, Hemolysins, and Superantigenic Toxins

We examined whether the isolates harbored genes coding for leucocidins, hemolysins, and superantigenic toxins. In total, eight genes (lukS, lukF, sea, seb, sed, see, seh, and sej) out of the 22 genes evaluated were not detected; however, four genes (hla, hlb, hld, and hlg) were detected (Table 3 and Table S2). The combination of the genes present was classified into five groups (Table 3). Among the toxin genes detected, lukD and lukM were found in 89.8% of isolates in this study (Table 3 and Table S2).
In relation to the coa type results, almost all coa VIb subtype strains (19 out of 22 VIb strains) harbored superantigenic genes (sec, seg, sei, sel2, sem, sen, seo, and tst). In contrast, 20 out of 30 VIc strains did not carry all these toxin genes, except for the SA9 isolate, which harbored all of the superantigenic genes tested. Notably, nine coa VIc subtype strains possessed only the seo gene, but not other genes (sec, seg, sei, sel2, sem, sen, and tst) (Supplementary Table S2).

3.2.2. Latex Agglutination Properties

To test whether S. aureus isolates possess cell surface-anchored proteins, we assessed the latex agglutination phenotype of the isolates. Twenty-two isolates (37%) were latex test-negative. Notably, all latex-negative strains appeared to belong to coa type VIb (Table 4). In contrast, all isolates belonging to coa type VII and subtype VIc were latex test-positive to a certain extent. Furthermore, although the number of CC398 (coa type VII) isolates was small, the latex test reaction in strains of this type tended to be stronger (one + +, six + + +) than that observed in strains belonging to coa subtype VIc, where the proportion of isolates with score + + + in coa subtype VII and VIc was 85.7% (six out of seven isolates) and 40% (six out of 30 isolates), respectively.

3.2.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility

To test antimicrobial susceptibility phenotypes of the S. aureus isolates, we determined their antibiotic susceptibility to ampicillin, oxacillin, cefazolin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, erythromycin, kanamycin, and streptomycin. All isolates were susceptible to oxacillin (MIC, 0.0625–0.5 μg/mL), cefazolin (0.125–0.5 μg/mL), erythromycin (0.25–0.5 μg/mL), kanamycin (2–4 μg/mL), and streptomycin (4–16 μg/mL) (Supplementary Table S2). Notably, all CC398 strains tested showed resistance to tetracycline, MICs of which, 32 or 64 μg/mL, were larger than the breakpoint of this antibiotic [29]. In contrast, all CC97 and CC705 strains were susceptible to tetracycline (Supplementary Table S2). All CC398 strains isolated in this study possessed tetM (Supplementary Figure S1). All CC398 strains, except for SA21, and one CC705 strain, SA40, showed resistance to ampicillin (8–16 μg/mL). The other strains, including one CC398 strain, SA21, showed an MIC ≤ 0.5 μg/mL for ampicillin (Supplementary Table S2).

4. Discussion

The presence of MRSA strains in livestock is a public health concern. Therefore, we performed the molecular characterization of S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitis cases in the Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Genetic typing showed that the predominant isolates analyzed were ruminant-associated: 28 and 24 isolates were grouped into clonal lineages CC97 and CC705, respectively, which is consistent with the results of earlier studies wherein S. aureus strains in lineages CC97 and CC705 have been reported as the major causative agents of bovine mastitis in Japan and in other countries [30,31,32,33]. The results of the spa typing of CC97 strains tended to vary, which is consistent with the results reported in previous studies [31,34]. Our findings were in agreement with those of previous studies showing that the majority of S. aureus isolates from bovine raw milk are classified into either coa subtype VIb or VIc [24]. Additionally, the pattern of possession of lukD and lukM was found to be similar to that reported in earlier studies wherein lukS and lukF genes encoding Panton–Valentine leucocidin were absent, and lukD and lukM were frequently identified in bovine isolates [31,35]. In addition, almost all coa subtype VIc S. aureus isolates, except for isolate SA9, belong to toxin group 2 or 3 (Supplementary Table S2), in which only a superantigenic toxin seo was found in the group 3, which is consistent with the previous study [24].
Notably, we found that seven strains belonging to CC398 (six ST398 clones and one ST4894 clone) were isolated from both cow milk (five isolates) and bulk milk (two isolates) from the same farm (farm B). Among the five ST398 isolates from cow milk, three strains (SA21, SA22, and SA23) were isolated from distinct quarters of the same cow on the same day, indicating that this S. aureus type was found in three out of 49 cows afflicted with mastitis (6.8% of cows tested in this study). Recent in-depth molecular typing experiments have revealed that most S. aureus strains are host-specific; CC97 and CC705 strains are commonly associated with cows [9,33]. In contrast, ST398 clones have a broad host specificity [9,11]. A serious concern regarding public health is the frequent association of ST398 strains with the methicillin resistance phenotype; MRSA isolates (MRSA ST398) are widely disseminated in pigs worldwide and can colonize multiple host species, including cows, sheep, poultry, horses, and humans [9,36]. However, S. aureus ST398, which causes bovine mastitis, has not yet been detected in Japan [12]. Notably, five ST398 isolates obtained from three mastitis cows were oxacillin-susceptible (classified as MSSA) (Supplementary Table S2). Furthermore, all these ST398 isolates showed tetracycline resistance, which is consistent with the results of other studies showing that MRSA ST398 isolates from bovine mastitis [13,25] and CC398 strains isolated from humans [37] generally possess a tetracycline resistance phenotype. Accordingly, it is worth noting that five ST398 isolates from cows found in this study were susceptible to oxacillin, as MSSA ST398 clones are commonly found in pigs, but not in other animals, including cows [10,38]. The tetracycline resistance phenotype of the CC398 isolates may be attributed to the horizontal gene transfer of tetracycline resistance genes [10,36]. As MSSA ST398 clones were isolated only from farm B, and strains in the lineage ST398 are rarely found—if present at all—in Japan, it can be speculated that these ST398 strains are not prevalent in farms in the Miyagi area and could have been transmitted from other animals and/or humans. This speculation is supported by the fact that all CC398 strains isolated from farm B do not possess lukD and lukM, which are strongly associated with bovine strains. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report the isolation of ST398 lineage of S. aureus from bovine mastitis cases in Japan.
We found in this study that two pairs of isolates were obtained from the same quarter of the respective cow at different lactation periods: SA16 and SA19 (CC705/ST705 strains) from farm C, and in the same lactation period, SA11 and SA18 (CC97/ST352 strains) from farm E, in which SA19 and SA18 were isolated after the disappearance of the previous clinical mastitis symptoms caused by SA16 and SA11, respectively. Each pair showed the same genetic typing results: SA16 and SA19 were ST705 (CC705), spa type t529, and coa type VIb; SA11 and SA18 were ST352 (CC97), spa type t267, and coa type VIc. In addition, the classification based on possession of toxin genes was the same for each pair: SA16/SA19 and SA11/SA18 pairs belonged to groups 5 and 2, respectively (Table 3). Thus, it was speculated that the recurrence of mastitis in the respective cow was caused by the same S. aureus clone, irrespective of cefazoline treatment in both cases, a phenomenon of which was documented previously [39].
We also found four isolates that showed peracute symptoms, one from farm D (SA38) and three from farm G (SA31, SA33, and SA49). It is interesting to note that SA38 was latex agglutination test-negative in contrast to other isolates (SA31, SA33, and SA49) that showed strong latex agglutination phenotype (Table 4). Although the reason of the latex-negative response of SA38 remains unclear, it is speculated that genetic change and/or variation of the membrane-associated virulence factors, described as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM), of this isolate could cause the latex-negative phenotype, as reported previously [40]. Further in-depth analysis is needed to address this issue.
This study covered a limited region of the Miyagi Prefecture (central part of Miyagi) and showed that typical CC97 and CC705 strains, which are known to be associated with bovine mastitis worldwide and in Japan, were isolated from cows with clinical symptoms and from bulk milk. This implies that typical mastitis-causing S. aureus groups are distributed in this limited dairy farm area. Furthermore, a key finding of this study was that MSSA CC398 strains (six ST398 clones and one ST4894 clone) were isolated from bovine mastitis and bulk milk from a single farm out of 15 farms in a limited area of Miyagi. Although the isolation of these MSSA ST398 strains from cow milk is rare, this finding suggests the possibility that ST398 lineage clones may be distributed in dairy farms in Japan to a greater extent than that estimated previously.
ST398 clones are known to infect multiple host species, including bovines and human [9]. MSSA S. aureus can evolve into MRSA by acquiring SCCmec [41]. In addition, CC398 MSSA isolates that were reported to cause bloodstream infections in a French hospital are more virulent than non-CC398 strains [42]. Hence, epidemiological surveillance and continuous monitoring of the prevalence of CC398 S. aureus clones in dairy farms in Japan are required.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we analyzed a total of 59 S. aureus strains isolated from intramammary infection cases (49 strains) and bulk milk (10 strains) between 2015 to 2019 in Miyagi Prefecture in Japan using sequence-based typing methods. Most importantly, CC398 strains (six ST398 clones and one ST4894 clone) were isolated from bovine mastitis and bulk milk from a single farm (out of 15 farms), which appeared to be oxacillin-sensitive. This is the first confirmed case of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) ST398 strains isolated from mastitis-containing cows in Japan. Our findings therefore suggest that nationwide surveillance and continuous monitoring of the prevalence of ST398 strains in dairy farms in Japan is important for managing human and animal health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10112117/s1, Figure S1: Identification of tetracycline resistance genes via PCR analysis in S. aureus strains isolated from mastitis cows; Table S1: Oligonucleotide primers used for MLST, spa, coa, toxin, and tetracycline resistant genes analysis; Table S2: Properties of S. aureus isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M. and H.Y.; methodology, R.M., S.S., K.M. and T.A.; investigation, R.M., S.S., K.M. and T.A.; resources, K.M. and H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M., S.S. and H.Y.; writing—review and editing, R.T. and H.Y.; supervision, H.Y.; project administration, H.Y.; funding acquisition, H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, JSPS KAKENHI grant number 19H03101 and, in part, by Core-to-Core Program (Advanced Research Networks) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hillerton, J.E.; Berry, E.A. Treating mastitis in the cow—A tradition or an archaism. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 1250–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sordillo, L.M.; Streicher, K.L. Mammary gland immunity and mastitis susceptibility. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2002, 7, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Heikkila, A.M.; Liski, E.; Pyorala, S.; Taponen, S. Pathogen-specific production losses in bovine mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 9493–9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Raboisson, D.; Ferchiou, A.; Pinior, B.; Gautier, T.; Sans, P.; Lhermie, G. The Use of Meta-Analysis for the Measurement of Animal Disease Burden: Losses Due to Clinical Mastitis as an Example. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Peton, V.; Le Loir, Y. Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 21, 602–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gomes, F.; Henriques, M. Control of Bovine Mastitis: Old and Recent Therapeutic Approaches. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 72, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Devriese, L.A. A simplified system for biotyping Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from animal species. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1984, 56, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lehar, S.M.; Pillow, T.; Xu, M.; Staben, L.; Kajihara, K.K.; Vandlen, R.; DePalatis, L.; Raab, H.; Hazenbos, W.L.; Morisaki, J.H.; et al. Novel antibody-antibiotic conjugate eliminates intracellular S. aureus. Nature 2015, 527, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fitzgerald, J.R. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: Origin, evolution and public health threat. Trends Microbiol. 2012, 20, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fluit, A.C. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cuny, C.; Friedrich, A.; Kozytska, S.; Layer, F.; Nubel, U.; Ohlsen, K.; Strommenger, B.; Walther, B.; Wieler, L.; Witte, W. Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in different animal species. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 300, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hata, E. Bovine mastitis outbreak in Japan caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus New York/Japan clone. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2016, 28, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Vanderhaeghen, W.; Cerpentier, T.; Adriaensen, C.; Vicca, J.; Hermans, K.; Butaye, P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 associated with clinical and subclinical mastitis in Belgian cows. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 144, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kloos, W.E. Natural populations of the genus Staphylococcus. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1980, 34, 559–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Foster, T.J. Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 948–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moser, A.; Stephan, R.; Corti, S.; Johler, S. Comparison of genomic and antimicrobial resistance features of latex agglutination test-positive and latex agglutination test-negative Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing bovine mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Armand-Lefevre, L.; Ruimy, R.; Andremont, A. Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 711–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Graveland, H.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Heesterbeek, H.; Mevius, D.; van Duijkeren, E.; Heederik, D. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in veal calf farming: Human MRSA carriage related with animal antimicrobial usage and farm hygiene. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nemati, M.; Hermans, K.; Lipinska, U.; Denis, O.; Deplano, A.; Struelens, M.; Devriese, L.A.; Pasmans, F.; Haesebrouck, F. Antimicrobial resistance of old and recent Staphylococcus aureus isolates from poultry: First detection of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant strain ST398. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 3817–3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ezaki, T.; Suzuki, S. Achromopeptidase for lysis of anaerobic gram-positive cocci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1982, 16, 844–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Enright, M.C.; Day, N.P.; Davies, C.E.; Peacock, S.J.; Spratt, B.G. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sanger, F.; Nicklen, S.; Coulson, A.R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 5463–5467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Harmsen, D.; Claus, H.; Witte, W.; Rothganger, J.; Claus, H.; Turnwald, D.; Vogel, U. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5442–5448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sakai, F.; Takemoto, A.; Watanabe, S.; Aoyama, K.; Ohkubo, T.; Yanahira, S.; Igarashi, H.; Kozaki, S.; Hiramatsu, K.; Ito, T. Multiplex PCRs for assignment of Staphylocoagulase types and subtypes of type VI Staphylocoagulase. J. Microbiol. Methods 2008, 75, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ote, I.; Taminiau, B.; Duprez, J.N.; Dizier, I.; Mainil, J.G. Genotypic characterization by polymerase chain reaction of Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with bovine mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 153, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ng, L.K.; Martin, I.; Alfa, M.; Mulvey, M. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol. Cell. Probes. 2001, 15, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. CLSI M07-A10; Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, Approved Standard—10th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2015.
  28. Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 3, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fessler, A.; Scott, C.; Kadlec, K.; Ehricht, R.; Monecke, S.; Schwarz, S. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from cases of bovine mastitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hata, E.; Katsuda, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Nishimori, K.; Uchida, I.; Higashide, M.; Ishikawa, E.; Sasaki, T.; Eguchi, M. Bacteriological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from humans and bulk milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hata, E.; Katsuda, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Uchida, I.; Tanaka, K.; Eguchi, M. Genetic variation among Staphylococcus aureus strains from bovine milk and their relevance to methicillin-resistant isolates from humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 2130–2139. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hata, E.; Kobayashi, H.; Nakajima, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Eguchi, M. Epidemiological analysis of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from cows and the environment of a dairy farm in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010, 72, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Smith, E.M.; Green, L.E.; Medley, G.F.; Bird, H.E.; Fox, L.K.; Schukken, Y.H.; Kruze, J.V.; Bradley, A.J.; Zadoks, R.N.; Dowson, C.G. Multilocus sequence typing of intercontinental bovine Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 4737–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Boss, R.; Cosandey, A.; Luini, M.; Artursson, K.; Bardiau, M.; Breitenwieser, F.; Hehenberger, E.; Lam, T.; Mansfeld, M.; Michel, A.; et al. Bovine Staphylococcus aureus: Subtyping, evolution, and zoonotic transfer. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 515–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yamada, T.; Tochimaru, N.; Nakasuji, S.; Hata, E.; Kobayashi, H.; Eguchi, M.; Kaneko, J.; Kamio, Y.; Kaidoh, T.; Takeuchi, S. Leukotoxin family genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from domestic animals and prevalence of lukM-lukF-PV genes by bacteriophages in bovine isolates. Vet. Microbiol. 2005, 110, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schijffelen, M.J.; Boel, C.H.; van Strijp, J.A.; Fluit, A.C. Whole genome analysis of a livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolate from a case of human endocarditis. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lozano, C.; Rezusta, A.; Gomez, P.; Gomez-Sanz, E.; Baez, N.; Martin-Saco, G.; Zarazaga, M.; Torres, C. High prevalence of spa types associated with the clonal lineage CC398 among tetracycline-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in a Spanish hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hasman, H.; Moodley, A.; Guardabassi, L.; Stegger, M.; Skov, R.L.; Aarestrup, F.M. spa type distribution in Staphylococcus aureus originating from pigs, cattle and poultry. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 141, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thomas, A.; Chothe, S.; Byukusenge, M.; Mathews, T.; Pierre, T.; Kariyawasam, S.; Luley, E.; Kuchipudi, S.; Jayarao, B. Prevalence and distribution of multilocus sequence types of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bulk tank milk and cows with mastitis in Pennsylvania. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stutz, K.; Stephan, R.; Tasara, T. SpA, ClfA, and FnbA genetic variations lead to Staphaurex test-negative phenotypes in bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 638–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Price, L.B.; Stegger, M.; Hasman, H.; Aziz, M.; Larsen, J.; Andersen, P.S.; Pearson, T.; Waters, A.E.; Foster, J.T.; Schupp, J.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: Host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. mBio 2012, 3, e00305-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bouiller, K.; Gbaguidi-Haore, H.; Hocquet, D.; Cholley, P.; Bertrand, X.; Chirouze, C. Clonal complex 398 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Genetic typing of S. aureus isolates with veterinarian diagnosis.
Table 1. Genetic typing of S. aureus isolates with veterinarian diagnosis.
No.IsolateFarmDate of Isolation
(YYYY. MM. DD)		Source of Milk aVeterinarian DiagnosisTypingcoa Type
P.L Tester bTemp. cSTCCspa
1SA3A2015. 6. 9Bulk−ND705705t529VIb
2SA14A2015. 10. 13Bulk−ND705705t529VIb
3SA28A2016. 7. 11Bulk−ND705705t529VIb
4SA4B2015. 6. 9Bulk−ND4894398t3934VII
5SA21 dB2016. 4. 5Individual±38.6398398t3934VII
6SA22 dB2016. 4. 5Individual±38.6398398t3934VII
7SA23 dB2016. 4. 5Individual±38.6398398t3934VII
8SA27B2016. 7. 11Bulk−ND398398t3934VII
9SA39B2017. 10. 13Individual++40.9398398t3934VII
10SA58B2019. 5. 19Individual+40.0398398t3934VII
11SA59B2019. 5. 19Individual+40.0705705t529VIb
12SA5C2015. 6. 21Individual++NDNT1705t1201VIb
13SA16 eC2015. 10. 14Individual++40.8705705t529VIb
14SA19 eC2016. 3. 12Individual++39.6705705t529VIb
15SA20C2016. 3. 16Individual+38.3705705t529VIb
16SA29C2019. 5. 19Individual+39.0705705t529VIb
17SA30C2016. 11. 14Individual++39.9705705t529VIb
18SA35C2017. 6. 5Individual++38,5705705t529VIb
19SA36C2017. 6. 5Individual++38.5705705t529VIb
20SA6D2015. 7. 6Individual++ND35297t267VIc
21SA7D2015. 7. 14Bulk−NDNT1705t1201VIc
22SA38 fD2017. 8. 1Individual+++40.5705705t529VIb
23SA45D2017. 11. 27Individual++39.635297t1201VIc
24SA48D2018. 2. 4Individual+38.8705705t529VIb
25SA53D2018. 11. 18Individual++39.035297t267VIc
26SA54D2018. 11. 20Individual+39.2705705t529VIb
27SA55D2018. 11. 27Individual+40.535297t1201VIc
28SA56D2018. 12. 25Individual+39.335297t267VIc
29SA61D2019. 8. 29Individual++39.335297t1201VIc
30SA11 eE2015. 9. 21Individual++38.535297t267VIc
31SA18 eE2016. 1. 18Individual+39.335297t267VIc
32SA13F2015. 9. 27Individual+38.5NT1705t267VIc
33SA15F2015. 10. 13Bulk−NDNT297t267VIc
34SA24 gF2016. 4. 12Individual++39.035297t267VIc
35SA25 gF2016. 4. 12Individual++39.035297t267VIc
36SA40F2017. 11. 7Individual−ND705705t529VIb
37SA41F2017. 11. 7Individual−ND35297t267VIc
38SA42F2017. 11. 7Individual++ND35297t267VIc
39SA43F2017. 11. 7Individual++ND35297t267VIc
40SA12G2015. 9. 21Individual++ND705705t529VIb
41SA26G2016. 7. 11Individual+++40.035297t267VIc
42SA31 fG2016. 11. 28Individual+++41.535297t267VIc
43SA32G2017. 1. 10Individual+++39.035297t359VIc
44SA33 fG2017. 1. 19Individual+++39.6NT397t267VIc
45SA34G2017. 2. 14Individual+38.8NT397t359VIc
46SA46G2017. 12. 11Individual++39.235297t267VIc
47SA47G2018. 1. 22Individual+38.835297t865VIc
48SA49 fG2018. 3. 1Individual++40.535297t267VIc
49SA52G2018. 5. 27Individual±39.3705705t529VIb
50SA1H2015. 5. 20Bulk−ND35297t267VIc
51SA51H2018. 4. 23Individual+39.535297t359VIc
52SA57I2019. 2. 23Individual+39.2705705t529VIb
53SA60I2019. 8. 30Individual++39.0705705t529VIb
54SA8J2015. 8. 13Bulk−ND705705t529VIb
55SA9K2015. 8. 13Bulk−NDNT397t529VIc
56SA10L2015. 9. 5Individual++40.535297t267VIc
57SA17M2015. 10. 18Individual+++39.6NT1705t529VIb
58SA37N2017. 6. 6Individual++39.635297t359VIc
59SA50O2018. 3. 27Individual++41.235297t359VIc
a Bulk, bulk tank milk; Individual, individual bovine sample with mastitis. b P.L tester was based on the modified California mastitis test. c ND, not determined. d isolated from the same cow in farm B on the same day. e recurrent mastitis bovine case. f peracute case. g isolated from the same cow in farm F on the same day.
Table
Table 2. Correlation of genetic typing (CC and ST) and spa type.
Table 2. Correlation of genetic typing (CC and ST) and spa type.
CCSTspa Type
t267t359t529t865t1201t3934
9735216 *140130
NT22 *211000
398398000006
4894000001
7057050020 *3000
NT1101020
*1 includes peracute mastitis case isolates SA31 and SA49. *2 includes peracute mastitis case isolate SA33. *3 includes peracute mastitis case isolate SA38.
Table
Table 3. Profiles of PCR analysis for leukocidines, haemolysisns, and superantigenic toxins.
Table 3. Profiles of PCR analysis for leukocidines, haemolysisns, and superantigenic toxins.
Grouphla, hlb,
hld,
hlg		lukDlukMsecsegseisel2semsenseotstlukS, lukF
sea, seb
sed, see
seh, sej		No. of Isolates
1+−−−−−−−−−−−6
2+++−−−−−−−−−21 *1
3+++−−−−−−+−−10 *2
4+++−++−+++−−2
5+++++++++++−20 *3
*1 includes peracute mastitis case isolates SA31 and SA33. *2 includes peracute mastitis case isolate SA49. *3 includes peracute mastitis case isolate SA38.
Table
Table 4. Prevalence data of genetic typing (CC, coa, and spa) and latex test.
Table 4. Prevalence data of genetic typing (CC, coa, and spa) and latex test.
CCcoa Typespa TypeLatex Agglutination Test
−++ ++ + +
CC97VIct2670312 *13 *2
t3590023
t5290100
t8650010
t12010120
CC398VIIt39340016
CC705VIbt52921 *3000
t12011000
VIct2670010
t12010100
*1 includes peracute mastitis case isolates SA33 and SA49. *2 includes peracute mastitis case isolate SA31. *3 includes peracute mastitis case isolate SA38.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miyazawa, R.; Shimoda, S.; Matsuda, K.; Tobe, R.; Ando, T.; Yoneyama, H. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Bovine Mastitis and Bulk Tank Milk: First Isolation of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Japan. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112117

AMA Style

Miyazawa R, Shimoda S, Matsuda K, Tobe R, Ando T, Yoneyama H. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Bovine Mastitis and Bulk Tank Milk: First Isolation of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Japan. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(11):2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miyazawa, Ryota, So Shimoda, Keiichi Matsuda, Ryuta Tobe, Tasuke Ando, and Hiroshi Yoneyama. 2022. "Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Bovine Mastitis and Bulk Tank Milk: First Isolation of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Japan" Microorganisms 10, no. 11: 2117. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop