Next Article in Journal
Biocontrol Ability and Production of Volatile Organic Compounds as a Potential Mechanism of Action of Olive Endophytes against Colletotrichum acutatum
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Subtyping of Salmonella Isolates Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption–Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF)
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic and Functional Variation of the Chlorophyll d-Producing Cyanobacterium Acaryochloris marina
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/microorganisms10030570
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Characterization of Salmonella Detected along the Broiler Production Chain in Trinidad and Tobago

by
Anisa Sarah Khan
1,
Rian Ewald Pierneef
2,
Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona
3,
Meghan Maguire
3,
Cong Li
4,
Gregory H. Tyson
4,
Sherry Ayers
4,
Karla Georges
1,
Woubit Abebe
5 and
Abiodun Adewale Adesiyun
1,6,*
1
School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine 999183, Trinidad and Tobago
2
Agricultural Research Council-Biotechnology Platform, Onderstepoort, 100 Old Soutpan Road, Pretoria 0110, South Africa
3
Division of Microbiology, Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA
4
Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708, USA
5
Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, 201 Frederick D Patterson Dr, Tuskegee, AL 36088, USA
6
Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Onderstepoort, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Pretoria 0110, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(3), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030570
Submission received: 10 February 2022 / Revised: 4 March 2022 / Accepted: 4 March 2022 / Published: 6 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Foodborne Pathogens: Detection Methods, Food Safety, and Public Health)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This cross-sectional study determined the serovars, antimicrobial resistance genes, and virulence factors of Salmonella isolated from hatcheries, broiler farms, processing plants, and retail outlets in Trinidad and Tobago. Salmonella in silico serotyping detected 23 different serovars where Kentucky 20.5% (30/146), Javiana 19.2% (28/146), Infantis 13.7% (20/146), and Albany 8.9% (13/146) were the predominant serovars. There was a 76.0% (111/146) agreement between serotyping results using traditional conventional methods and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in in silico analysis. In silico identification of antimicrobial resistance genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, peptides, sulfonamides, and antiseptics were detected. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was detected in 6.8% (10/146) of the isolates of which 100% originated from broiler farms. Overall, virulence factors associated with secretion systems and fimbrial adherence determinants accounted for 69.3% (3091/4463), and 29.2% (1302/4463) counts, respectively. Ten of 20 isolates of serovar Infantis (50.0%) showed MDR and contained the blaCTX-M-65 gene. This is the first molecular characterization of Salmonella isolates detected along the entire broiler production continuum in the Caribbean region using WGS. The availability of these genomes will help future source tracking during epidemiological investigations associated with Salmonella foodborne outbreaks in the region and worldwide.

1. Introduction

Since the 1950s, Salmonella has been highlighted as an economically important zoonotic pathogen by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [1]. The ability of Salmonella to cause self-limiting gastroenteritis, coupled with high mortality rates in humans due to invasive infections are causes for public health concerns [2,3]. While many animals serve as reservoirs for Salmonella, poultry, and poultry products are one of the primary sources of salmonellosis in humans. Therefore, the possibility of transmission from reservoirs to other animals and humans is concerning. This is compounded by antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella strains within the environment, necessitating surveillance and control measures among suspected reservoirs such as chickens. In addition, S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis are of public health significance due to their ability to cause disease in humans and animals in developed and developing countries. However, variations in Salmonella serovar distribution have been reported in different countries and are said to be a function of geographic location [4,5].
The use of antimicrobial agents in food-producing animals has been implicated in developing multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms and spreading them through the food chain [6,7]. Of importance to human health, some cephalosporins (β-lactams), quinolones, and aminoglycosides have been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as critically important agents since they are used in the treatment of extra-intestinal salmonellosis [8]. The use of ciprofloxacin and ceftiofur as the established therapy protocol for human salmonellosis could be jeopardized as genetic mechanisms promoting MDR isolates have been reported [9]. β-lactamases constitute the primary mechanism of cephalosporin resistance via enzymatic modification, where different genes are implicated. The extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESβL) include certain alleles of blaTEM, and all alleles of blaCTX-M and blaSHV genes. Extended-spectrum cephalosporins can also be hydrolyzed by the AmpC β-lactamases, of which blaCMY is the most common of particular importance. Quinolone resistance was initially known to develop through chromosomal mutations [10]. However, the recent emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) mechanisms has been reported. These include qnr genes: qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, qnrC, and qnrD, that encode pentapeptide repeat proteins that bind to and protect DNA topoisomerase IV from inhibition by quinolones, the aac (6′)-Ib-cr (modified acetyltransferase) and qepA (efflux pump) genes, respectively [11,12]. Plasmids are traditionally known to carry antimicrobial-resistant genes and several virulence-associated traits; however, other resistance mechanisms have been reported in Salmonella elsewhere [13,14]. Increasing trends of resistance to quinolones and 3rd generation cephalosporins such as ciprofloxacin and ceftiofur in clinical isolates have led to the introduction of carbapenems and colistin as critical antibiotics of last resort in human salmonellosis [8]. However, the use of colistin to treat both humans and animals has resulted in the emergence of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes [15,16]. To date, nine variants of mcr genes have been detected in Salmonella isolated from humans and animals [16,17,18].
Similar genetic determinants conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, beta-lactams, and fluoroquinolones have been detected in Salmonella strains isolated from livestock and humans, concluding that food and environmental contamination from livestock are carriers of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) Salmonella and are sources of infection to humans [19,20,21]. Thus, it is critical to investigate the resistance profiles and phenotypes they exhibit, and the mutations responsible for resistance using molecular analysis methods.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the genotypic profiles (serovar, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence factors) of Salmonella isolated from various stages of the broiler production–processing–retailing chain in Trinidad and Tobago.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Selection

A total of 146 isolates of Salmonella used in this study originated from prior studies conducted at hatcheries and broiler farms [22], broiler processing plants [23], and retail outlets (pluck shops and supermarkets) [24,25]. The type of samples collected from the various studies are as follows, hatcheries: broken eggshells, eggs in the hatcher, eggs in the incubator, hatcher environmental swabs, hatcher fluff, and stillborn chicks; broiler farms: boot swabs, cloacal swabs, litter drag swabs, feed, and water samples—in-house supply and storage tank; processing plants: chilled chicken parts, chilled whole carcasses, neck skins, pre-evisceration carcasses, and post-evisceration carcasses; retail outlets: chicken carcasses. From a total of 207 duplicate isolates (from different enrichment and selective media) of Salmonella, which represented 23 serovars from the aforementioned sources, the selected 146 isolates were representatives of the serovars recovered from all Salmonella-positive samples. Briefly, samples were processed to isolate Salmonella using two enrichments broths, Rappaport-Vassiliadis Soya (RVS) and tetrathionate (TT) (Oxoid, Hampshire, England), and two selective agar, brilliant green agar (BGA) and xylose lysine tergitol 4 (XLT-4) selective media (Oxoid, Hampshire, England) [26]. Suspected Salmonella colonies (pink isolated colonies on BGA, red colonies with black centers on XLT-4) were subjected to biochemical tests for identification of Salmonella spp. using standard methods [27]. Isolates of Salmonella recovered from the four combinations of media (RVS/BGA, RVS/XLT-4, TT/BGA, and TT/XLT-4) were initially screened using the conventional slide agglutination test. Thereafter, 146 non-duplicate isolates of Salmonella, randomly selected to represent the serovars and positive samples were subjected to whole-genome sequencing. The following is a summary of the number of isolates included from earlier studies: hatcheries (n = 10), farms (n = 20), processing plant (n = 61), and retail outlets (n = 55). Five additional human clinical isolates of Salmonella obtained from the Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA) were included in our panel of isolates subjected to WGS.

2.2. DNA Extraction and Sequencing

DNA was extracted using the Maxwell RSC cultured cells DNA kit with a Maxwell RSC instrument (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols for Gram-negative bacteria with additional RNase treatment. DNA concentrations were measured with a Qubit fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), standardized to 0.2 ng/µL, and the samples were stored at 4 °C before library preparation.
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of the Salmonella isolates was performed by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) Laboratory and Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition genomics laboratory (FDA-CFSAN) and Center for Veterinary Medicine (FDA-CVM), Maryland, USA. The WGS data was generated on an Illumina MiSeq using 2× 250 bp and 2 × 300 bp paired-end chemistry (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, at 50–150X coverage. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the libraries were constructed using 100 ng of genomic DNA using the Illumina DNA Prep (M) Tagmentation kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and the Nextera XT kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.3. Genomic Data Analysis and In Silico Determination of Genetic Elements

Quality control including adapter removal of the raw data was conducted using BBDuk (v.37.90; https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools/bb-tools-user-guide/bbduk-guide/, accessed on 23 July 2021); sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/). SPAdes v.3.12.0 [28] was used to create a de novo assembly of each isolate. Only contigs larger than 500 bp were retained for further analysis. Serovar prediction was made using command-line version of SISTR [29] (Version: sistr_cmd v.1.1.1).
Gene finding in each isolate was performed with Prodigal v.2.6.3 [30] (parameters -c -n).
VFDB [31] was used to assign virulence factors. This was carried out with the predicted genes (amino acid format) from Prodigal using NCBI-blast-2.9.0+. Results were filtered for the top hit with 100% identity and 100% alignment length.
CARD [32] was used to assign antimicrobial resistance. This was performed with the predicted genes (amino acid format) from Prodigal using NCBI-blast-2.9.0+. Results were filtered for the top hit with 100% identity and 100% alignment length.

2.4. Phenotypic Methods Used for Comparison with WGS

Conventional serotyping methods using the phase reversal technique described previously [22,23,25] were performed at the Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, St. Michael, Barbados. Antimicrobial resistance determined by the disk diffusion method [22,23,24] described previously was also used. Data generated from these two methods were compared to the genomic data.

2.5. Statistical Analyzes

R version 4.0.2 was used for Chi-square analysis and data visualization.

2.6. Data Deposition

The draft genome sequence of all S. enterica strains have been deposited at GenBank under the accession listed in Table S1—Metadata of 146 Salmonella isolates detected along the broiler production chain in Trinidad and Tobago.

3. Results

3.1. Serotyping Results

Overall, the 146 isolates of Salmonella subjected to conventional serotyping methods were classified into 23 serovars and 3 unspecific groups (unknown serotype). In silico analysis of the WGS data generated from these 146 isolates using the SISTR software identified 23 different serovars where Kentucky 20.5% (30/146), Javiana 19.2% (28/146), Infantis 13.7% (20/146), and Albany 8.9% (13/146) were the predominant serovars. There was a 76.0% (111/146) agreement in the test results of both methods. Isolates classified as S. Albany (n = 2), Gaminara (n = 2), Oranienburg (n = 1), and Soerenga (n = 1) by SISTR were all classified as S. Infantis (n = 6) using the traditional method. Three S. Warragul isolates detected using the conventional method were classified as S. Caracas on SISTR analysis. The distribution of serovars of Salmonella isolates from various sources is shown in Table 1.

3.2. Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles

A total of 71 ARO accessions (Antibiotic Resistance Ontology, as defined by CARD) were detected among 22 isolates. Genes associated with aminoglycoside resistance, i.e., aac(3)-IV (plasmid-encoded), aac(6′)-Iaa (chromosomal- encoded), aac(6′)Iy (chromosomal-encoded), aph(3′)-Ia (plasmid-encoded), and aph(4)-Ia (plasmid-encoded) (Table 2) were found at frequencies ranging from 1.4% to 7.5%. All our S. Manhattan and S. Aberdeen strains containing the often silent, chromosomal-encoded aac(6′)-Iaa and aac(6′)Iy genes, exhibited phenotypic aminoglycoside resistance. Ten (6.8%) of 146 isolates contained the blaCTX-M-65 gene, which confers cephalosporin resistance. This gene was identified in S. Infantis isolates only. Genes qacEDelta1 and sul1, responsible for antiseptic and sulfonamide resistance, were each detected at a frequency of 8.2% (12/146). mcr-9, the mobilized and plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene, was found in only one isolate. Table 3 shows the distribution of AROs among Salmonella isolates from various sources. Isolates from broiler farms accounted for 83.1% (59/71) of AROs where the predominance of aac(3)-IV (9.9%; 7/71), aph(4)-Ia (9.9%; 7/71), qacEdelta1 (9.9%; 7/71), sul1 (9.9%; 7/71), and blaCTX-M-65 (9.9%; 7/71) among cloacal swab isolates (62.7%; 37/59) was evident. Salmonella isolated from the water supply at farms (18.6%; 11/59) were found to contain 66.7% (6/9) of the AROs found in this study except for mcr-9.1, aac(6′)-Iaa and aac(6′)-Iy.
Overall, 6.8% (10/146) MDR (resistance to 3 or more classes of antimicrobial agents, according to CARD classification) isolates were detected, of which 100% were recovered at broiler farms and belonged to serovar Infantis.

3.3. Virulence Profile

Overall, for the Salmonella strains from the four sources (hatcheries, farms, processing plants, and retail outlets), 4463 different virulence factors belonging to five virulence classes were identified. Genes classified as secretion systems and fimbrial adherence determinant classes accounted for the predominant virulence classes of 69.3% (3091/4463) and 29.2% (1302/4463) counts, respectively. Magnesium uptake, stress adaptation, and toxin classes accounted for less than 1.3% (56/4463) counts, respectively. Salmonella isolates (n = 10) recovered from the hatcheries contained virulence factors belonging to secretion systems (4.2%, 187/4463) and fimbrial adherence determinants (2.0%, 91/4463), whereas farm isolates (n = 20) were found to contain fimbrial adherence determinants, 4.4% (198/4463), and secretion system, 10.1% (451/4463). Processing plant Salmonella isolates (n = 61) contained predominantly factors in the secretion systems, fimbrial adherence determinants, and toxins, accounting for 30.0% (1341/4463), 12.4% (553/4463), and 0.6% (26/4463) count, respectively. Retail outlet isolates (n = 55) contained fimbrial adherence determinants, 10.3% (460/4463), secretion system, 24.9% (1112/4463), and toxin-related factors, 0.6% (27/4463). The differences in the detection of virulence factors among the sources were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Serovars Kentucky, Javiana, and Infantis contained higher numbers of virulence factors (all related to secretion systems), accounting for 13.0% (578/4463), 12.1% (540/4463), and 12.1% (517/4463), respectively, of the virulence factors (Table S2). Therefore, it is pertinent to mention that they were the predominant serovars detected in this study.
S. Infantis isolates contained factors associated with secretion systems (TTSS-1 translocated effectors, TTSS-SPI-1-, and TTSS-SPI-2-encoded genes), 12.1% (540/4463), and factors associated with fimbrial adherence determinants (bcfA, D, F, csg A, B, C, E, F, G, and lpfB, E), 4.9% (220/4463). For the isolates of S. Javiana, 11.6% (517/4463), 4.4% (196/4463), and 0.6% (28/4463) were positive for factors associated with secretion systems, fimbrial adherence determinants (bcfA, csgA, C, D, F, G, and fimF), and toxins (cdtB), respectively. Only secretion system and fimbrial adherence determinant factors were detected among Kentucky isolates, accounting for 13.0% (578/4463) and 5.9% (263/4463), respectively. S. Schwarzengrund, Senftenberg, and Caracas contained predominantly factors associated with secretion systems at frequencies ranging from 1.3% to 2.8%. Seven serovars (Caracas, Chester, Enteritidis, Gaminara, Javiana, Montevideo, and Schwarzengrund) contained virulence factors related to toxins, where the cdtB was detected in all except serovar Enteritidis, where the spvB gene was detected.

3.4. Comparison of Frequency of Detection of Resistance and Virulence Factors in Salmonella Strains

Comparisons between the possession of virulence factors (VFDB accessions) and AMR genes (ARO accessions) across serovars were performed and detected 10 sources and years (farm-to-fork, hatcheries, processing plants, retail outlets, ‘pluck shops’, supermarkets, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019). Statistically significant positive correlations in Salmonella serovars isolated from farms, retail outlets, and ‘pluck shops’, as well as those isolated in 2016 and 2019 were detected, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). Negative and non-significant positive correlations are not displayed.

3.5. Detection of ESβL Resistance Genes and Virulence Genes in Isolates of S. Infantis

A comparison of the phenotypic and genotypic resistance patterns in S. Infantis isolates is displayed in Table 4. The blaCTX-M-65 gene was only detected among the S. Infantis isolates. Of the 10 isolates of serovar Infantis positive for blaCTX-M-65 gene, phenotypically (using the disk diffusion method), two were resistant to two classes of antimicrobial agents, and six were MDR. However, genotypically, all 10 Infantis isolates exhibited MDR. Furthermore, the resistance gene qacEDelta1 responsible for antiseptic resistance was found in all the 10 serovar Infantis isolates. Additionally, virulence factors associated with fimbrial adherence determinants and the secretion system were detected in all the 10 isolates of serovar Infantis.

4. Discussion

This is the first documented WGS study conducted in the poultry (broilers and layers) industry along the broiler production chain in Trinidad and Tobago, and the Caribbean region at large. Whole-genome sequencing analysis has been used to investigate genetic characteristics and phylogenies among Salmonella strains isolated from different origins, such as humans, food, animals, and the environment [33,34,35,36]. The current study was comprised of isolates from four cross-sectional studies conducted at the level of retail outlets (2016–2017) [25], broiler processing plants (2018) [23], broiler farms, and broiler hatcheries (2019) [22]. Although several limitations exist with the use of cross-sectional instead of longitudinal studies, this approach provides valuable information on the status of Salmonella shedding and contamination at the four levels (hatcheries, farms, processing plants, and retail outlets) of the broiler production chain in the country. Furthermore, the information obtained will lead to a better understanding of the epidemiology of Salmonella and the associated public health implications. Finally, this approach will also facilitate the implementation of an effective surveillance system across the poultry production system in the country.
Using the SISTR pipeline, a 76% agreement was detected with the traditional conventional serotyping method, which utilizes the White–Kauffman–Le Minor (WKL) scheme, which is based on immunological reactions to somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens [37]. However, it has been documented that conventional serotyping is time-consuming, labor-intensive, costly, and some isolates do not express serotype antigens due to a single nucleotide change in the genome [38,39]. On the other hand, the SISTR pipeline has been validated and a 94.6% overall serovar prediction accuracy was reported when 4291 genomes were analyzed [29]. In silico serotyping channels such as SISTR provide us with an understanding of the antigenic genes carried by an isolate and not necessarily what is expressed by that isolate, an advantage over traditional serotyping methods. In a study that compared three in silico pipelines, SISTR, SeqSero, and MLST to traditional serotyping techniques using a set of 813 verified clinical and laboratory isolates, 94.8%, 88.2%, and 88.3% accuracy, respectively was reported [40]. Of significance in our study was the incorrect serotype classification by the conventional method of potential public health important serotypes such as S. Albany, Senftenberg, Infantis, and Caracas. Variations in Salmonella serovars in poultry have been reported in different countries and are known to be a function of geographic location [5]. In Egypt [41], serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium were isolated from broiler chickens at retail outlets; in Japan [42], serovars Infantis, Manhattan, Schwarzengrund from cecal samples in broilers; in China [43], serovars Pullorum, Gallinarum, Enteritidis, and Typhimurium were the predominant serotypes. Unlike our study where S. Kentucky, Javiana, Infantis, and Albany were the predominant serovars isolated along the broiler production chain.
Gene blaCTX-M-65 was detected in 77% (31/40) of the S. Infantis strains isolated at Colombian processing plants [44], a finding comparable to the 50% (10/20) detected in the current study. Worldwide, the rapid development of resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, predominantly associated with the production of β-lactamase-producing bacteria (EsβL) in different Salmonella serovars, has been reported. In agreement with our study, EsβL resistance genes have been detected in Salmonella strains isolated from animal products in several countries, including Korea (food animals and humans), 1.6% [45], Mexico (humans and animals), 6.6% [46], and Brazil (broiler chickens), where 27.8% [47] of isolates were positive for the blaCTX-M gene. The detection of 6.8% MDR strains among serovar Infantis isolates possessing the blaCTX-M-65 gene is of public health significance due to the reported cross-transmission of EsβL-producing bacterial strains from poultry farms to other livestock farms and humans with the potential for wide-spread population infections [48,49]. A cause for concern is the detection of 10 MDR serovar Infantis strains, each possessing the blaCTX-M-65 gene, in addition to 38 virulence homologs according to VFDB. In 2014, the detection of an MDR emergent Salmonella Infantis (ESI) strain, often containing the blaCTX-M-65 gene, was first reported in Israel, and subsequently detected in Italy, Japan, and Russia [50,51,52,53]. However, retrospective sequencing tracked the origins of this clone to South America [54,55]. This ESI strain was documented to carry a large plasmid ESI (pESI) with several antimicrobial resistance, metal, and virulence genes. This clone was detected in retail meats in Tennessee, USA, in 2014, but by 2019 had spread throughout the USA to comprise 29% Salmonella isolated from retail chickens and 7% from retail turkey [56]. This clone also accounted for nearly 10% of all human Infantis cases by 2017 in the United States and was highly related to chicken sources [57]. The most frequently described ESβL genotype in Colombia between 1997–2018 was CTX-M, which was detected primarily in S. Typhimurium (40%; 65/164) and S. Infantis (29%; 48/164). Detection of blaCTX genes has been reported in Latin American countries, such as Brazil and Argentina [58]. The assumption was that cephalosporin resistance development was due to the injection of ceftiofur into fertile eggs at hatcheries to prevent E. coli-induced omphalitis in day-old chicks [59]. This assumption was supported by a Canadian study that revealed a strong correlation between this practice and the increase in ceftiofur-resistant strains of S. Heidelberg [60]. This practice was not evident at hatcheries in our study, nor were bla genes detected among hatchery isolates.
A quick look into the NCBI Pathogen detection browser (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens) allows us to determine that the eight strains of S. Infantis (ST32) detected in this study were highly related to the MDR emergent S. Infantis strains carrying blaCTX-M-65 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens/tree#Salmonella/PDG000000002.2405/PDS000089910.160?term=CFSAN103822,%20CFSAN103806,%20CFSAN103805,%20CFSAN103797,%20CFSAN103801,%20CFSAN103796,%20CFSAN103798,%20CFSAN103802, accessed on 2 March 2022) reported in previous studies [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. This highlights the usefulness of WGS approaches for AMR surveillance in a country or region, in this case, Trinidad and Tobago, considering the significant public health and clinical implications resulting from the presence of this large plasmid ESI. The plasmid detected in our S. Infantis carrying the CTX-M-65 gene (Accession: CP066336.1) contained 312,952 bp, differing from the plasmids reported in the USA [61] and Italy [52], which ranged from 316,160 to 323,122bp. These eight strains exhibited two resistance profiles: aac(3)-IVa, aadA1, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(4)-Ia, blaCTX-M-65, dfrA14, gyrA_D87Y, mdsA, mdsB, sul1, tet(A) (4 strains) and aac(3)-IVa, aadA1, aph(4)-Ia, blaCTX-M-65, dfrA14, gyrA_D87Y, mdsA, mdsB, sul1, tet(A) (4 strains), according to the NCBI database (AMRFinderPlus). Our findings were similar to the aph(4)-Ia, aac(3)-IVa, aph(3′)-Ic, blaCTX-M-65, fosA3, floR, dfrA14, gyrA_D87Y, sul1, tetA, aadA1 pattern detected in the USA [61] and aph(4)-Ia, aac(3)-IVa, aph(3′)-Ic, blaCTX-M-65, fosA3, floR, dfrA14, sul1, tetA, aadA1 detected clinically in Italy [52], where both studies used ResFinder.
It must be highlighted that EsβL-producing K. pneumoniae was detected in 78.8% (41/52) of clinical isolates originating from a tertiary care hospital in Trinidad and Tobago, where the blaSHV and blaCTX-M genes were predominantly detected [62]. It is of interest that all the MDR Infantis strains isolated in the current study originated from broiler farms. This is because there is a potential for Salmonella strains positive for blaCTX gene, AMR, and associated virulence genes, to enter the human food chain through the processing plants and chicken products at the retail outlets. This is supported by reports documenting close association of MDR Infantis strains recovered from the broiler population to animal production environments, eventually spreading into the food chain and potentially humans [63,64].
As with this study, aminoglycoside resistance genes and sul1 genes were also detected in Salmonella Infantis strains isolated in a recent study conducted at three Colombian broiler processing plants [44]. Sulphonamide resistance conferred by sul genes [65] was reported in Canadian swine and chicken Salmonella isolates [66] and at a broiler processing plant in China [67]. However, in our study, only the sul1 gene was detected in all our S. Infantis strains and the only Senftenberg strain assessed. Arkali et al. [68] detected the sul1 gene among 58% of Salmonella isolated from chickens in Eastern Turkey. The detection of one mobilized colistin resistance mcr-9.1 gene [69] in an isolate of serovar Senftenberg was not a significant finding. This gene is not associated with colistin resistance in Salmonella or E. coli in the United States [70]. However, detecting this novel mcr-9 homolog is crucial as it can confer phenotypic resistance to colistin and warrants close monitoring [16].
The qacEdelta1 gene, known to confer resistance to antiseptics, was also detected in Salmonella from retail foods of animal origin [20]. It must be considered that the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes can represent the phenotypic resistance of antimicrobial agents, and thus diminish their effectiveness when used on farms or processing plants. However, it is important to mention that there are several mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. It is not always associated with a specific gene responsible for resistance. This supports our findings where resistance genes were found in two Infantis strains, but they were all sensitive phenotypically. Cross-resistance to antimicrobial agents can occur with resistance within group members of chemical-related compounds, and/or with a similar mechanism of action [71,72]. The correlation of genotypic and phenotypic resistance was variable in our study, contrary to the findings of other studies where the harmonic correlation was evident [67,73]. The lack of correlation between phenotypic and genotypic resistance profiles may occur due to the low sensitivity and specificity of the disk method, inoculum concentration, laboratory capacity, and individual skill. Misalignments between phenotypic and genotypic resistance patterns have been reported by others [74,75].
In the current study, only 6.8% (10/146) of the isolates, based on genotypic characterization, exhibited multidrug resistance, at variance with the 96.6% reported in Salmonella isolated from chickens sampled at chicken farms in South Africa [76] and the 27.3% reported for Salmonella strains isolated from broilers in Egypt [77]. Therefore, our low frequency of detecting MDR is of therapeutic significance at the broiler farm level in the country.
SPI-1 and SPI-2 genes enable the invasion of eukaryotic cells, induction of macrophage cytotoxicity, invasion of phagocytes, and survival inside phagocytic cells [78,79,80,81]. The inactivation of the TTSS-1 translocated effector gene sipB in S. Dublin has been associated with reduced fluid secretion and inflammation [82]. This is of public health significance because of the 73 genes detected in the current study, 49.3% and 35.6% were detected in Salmonella strains isolated from processing plants and retail outlets, respectively, highlighting the risk posed to consumers should they be infected with a serovar positive for the gene. In the current study, serovars Aberdeen, Anatum, Enteritidis, Infantis, Javiana, Manhattan, Virchow, and Weltevreden were all positive for the sipB gene.
Fimbrial adherence factors that aid intestinal adhesion such as long polar fimbriae (lpfA) and aggregative fimbriae (agfA/csgA) are highly conserved in Salmonella and have been implicated in biofilm formation and adhesion to surfaces and epithelial cells that is an important stage before biofilm formation, respectively [83,84]. This is important in the current study because 99.3% of the isolates were positive for the csgA gene, therefore having the potential for biofilm formation and persistence in the environment. In addition, the high incidence of csgA in our study is comparable to the findings in different serovars, as reported by others [85,86].
Typhoid toxin/cdtB cytolethal distending toxin B, previously thought to be a unique virulence factor in S. Typhi, was recently characterized in at least 40 non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars [87], as evident in our study. The detection of virulence genes invA, csgA, lpfA, sopE, and spvC in our S. Enteritidis strains agrees with the findings of studies conducted on chickens sold at Bangladeshi retail outlets [88], in food and humans in Brazil [89], and in humans and animals in Iran [90].
The positive correlations in the detection of AMR and virulence genes in the Salmonella serovars isolated from farms, retail outlets, and ‘pluck shops’ are indicative of close similarities in the occurrence of AMR and virulence genes in different serovars and isolates in the study area or source-dependent AMR/virulence profiles. The presence of virulence genes and the occurrence of AMR Salmonella isolates can potentially accelerate the pathogenicity of microbes [91]. It has also been reported that the emergence of resistant Salmonella enterica solely depends on genetic and pathogenicity mechanisms that may enhance survivability by preserving their drug resistance genes [92]. However, the correlation between AMR and virulence has been shown to vary in studies conducted by others. The acquisition of AMR by Salmonella isolates decreases [93,94], increases [95,96], or does not change [97,98] their potential virulence according to those authors.

5. Conclusions

This study highlighted the antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes associated with Salmonella serovars isolated along the broiler production chain in Trinidad and Tobago. The detection of the blaCTX-M-65 gene, MDR, and highly virulent S. Infantis isolates based on their genotypes, is cause for concern given their international emergence and implications for human health. The positive correlation of resistance and virulence genes detected at broiler farms, processing plants, and retail outlets (‘pluck shops’) is significant since the latter two stages of the broiler continuum can directly impact consumers of contaminated, improperly handled, or cooked chicken.
The availability of these genomes will help future source tracking during epidemiological investigations associated with Salmonella foodborne outbreaks in the region and worldwide. Therefore, the abundance of data from several sources in the country will benefit the scientific community at large.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10030570/s1, Table S1: Metadata of 146 Salmonella isolates detected along the broiler production chain in Trinidad and Tobago. Table S2: Distribution of virulence genes and classes among the various serovars of Salmonella isolated in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.A., A.S.K. and K.G.; methodology, A.A.A., A.S.K., R.E.P., N.G.-E., M.M., C.L., G.H.T. and S.A.; software, R.E.P., N.G.-E., M.M. and G.H.T.; validation, R.E.P., N.G.-E., M.M. and G.H.T.; formal analysis, R.E.P., A.A.A. and A.S.K.; investigation, A.A.A., A.S.K. and K.G.; resources, A.A.A., N.G.-E., M.M., G.H.T. and S.A.; data curation, A.A.A., A.S.K. and R.E.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.A., A.S.K. and W.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A.A., A.S.K., K.G., R.E.P., N.G.-E., M.M., C.L., G.H.T. and S.A.; visualization, R.E.P., A.S.K. and A.A.A.; supervision, A.A.A., K.G. and W.A.; project administration, A.A.A., A.S.K. and K.G.; funding acquisition, A.A.A. and A.S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus Research and Publication Fund Committee approved the funding for the project (Research grant #2660-457522 on 3 July 2017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved and conducted under terms approved by the University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus Research Committee (Research grant #2660-457522 on 13 April 2016). The UWI St. Augustine Campus Ethics Committee exempted the project from ethical review after assessing the research proposal.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) by the Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA) from where the five isolates of Salmonella originated, to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are contained within the article and the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) Laboratory for conducting some whole-genome sequencing. We are grateful to the staff of the Bacteriology section of the Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA), Port-of-Spain for providing strains of Salmonella Infantis and Enteritidis isolated from human gastroenteritis cases in the country. The technical assistance of Alva Marie Stewart-Johnson and Sannandan Samlal is appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the U.S. Government.

References

  1. Ulaya, D.W. Determination of virulence factors in Salmonella isolates of human, poultry, and dog origin in Lusaka district, Zambia. Master’s Thesis, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Salmonella. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/index.html (accessed on 3 October 2020).
  3. European Food Safety Authority; European Centre for Disease Prevention Control. The European Union One Health 2018 zoonoses report. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Shilangale, R.P.; Di Giannatale, E.; Chimwamurombe, P.M.; Kaaya, G.P. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella in animal feed produced in Namibia. Vet. Ital. 2012, 48, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Foley, S.L.; Lynne, A.M.; Nayak, R. Salmonella challenges: Prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, E149–E162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kimera, Z.I.; Mshana, S.E.; Rweyemamu, M.M.; Mboera, L.E.G.; Matee, M.I.N. Antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals and the environment: An African perspective. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2020, 9, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Ma, F.; Xu, S.; Tang, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L. Use of antimicrobials in food animals and impact of transmission of antimicrobial resistance on humans. Biosaf. Health 2021, 3, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Collignon, P.J.; Conly, J.M.; Andremont, A.; McEwen, S.A.; Aidara-Kane, A.; Agerso, Y.; Andremont, A.; Collignon, P.; Conly, J.; Dang Ninh, T.; et al. World Health Organization ranking of antimicrobials according to their importance in human medicine: A critical step for developing risk management strategies to control antimicrobial resistance from food animal production. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 1087–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, M.; Sahm, D.F.; Jacoby, G.A.; Hooper, D.C. Emerging plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance associated with the qnr gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1295–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hooper, D.C.; Jacoby, G.A. Mechanisms of drug resistance: Quinolone resistance. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2015, 1354, 12–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fàbrega, A.; Madurga, S.; Giralt, E.; Vila, J. Mechanism of action of and resistance to quinolones. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 40–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chen, S.; Zhao, S.; White, D.G.; Schroeder, C.M.; Lu, R.; Yang, H.; McDermott, P.F.; Ayers, S.; Meng, J. Characterization of multiple-antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella serovars isolated from retail meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Miko, A.; Pries, K.; Schroeter, A.; Helmuth, R. Molecular mechanisms of resistance in multidrug-resistant serovars of Salmonella enterica isolated from foods in Germany. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 1025–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism mcr-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carroll, L.M.; Gaballa, A.; Guldimann, C.; Sullivan, G.; Henderson, L.O.; Wiedmann, M. Identification of novel mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-9 in a multidrug-resistant, colistin-susceptible Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolate. mBio 2019, 10, e00853-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Borowiak, M.; Baumann, B.; Fischer, J.; Thomas, K.; Deneke, C.; Hammerl, J.A.; Szabo, I.; Malorny, B. Development of a novel mcr-6 to mcr-9 multiplex PCR and assessment of mcr-1 to mcr-9 occurrence in colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica isolates from environment, feed, animals and food (2011–2018) in Germany. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rebelo, A.R.; Bortolaia, V.; Kjeldgaard, J.S.; Pedersen, S.K.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Hansen, I.M.; Guerra, B.; Malorny, B.; Borowiak, M.; Hammerl, J.A.; et al. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4, and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23, 17–00672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eguale, T.; Birungi, J.; Asrat, D.; Njahira, M.N.; Njuguna, J.; Gebreyes, W.A.; Gunn, J.S.; Djikeng, A.; Engidawork, E. Genetic markers associated with resistance to beta-lactam and quinolone antimicrobials in non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates from humans and animals in central Ethiopia. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2017, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Deng, W.; Quan, Y.; Yang, S.; Guo, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Chen, S.; Zhou, K.; He, L.; Li, B.; et al. Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella from retail foods of animal origin and its association with disinfectant and heavy metal resistance. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 782–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Vilela, F.P.; Gomes, C.N.; Passaglia, J.; Rodrigues, D.P.; Costa, R.G.; Tiba Casas, M.R.; Fernandes, S.A.; Falcão, J.P.; Campioni, F. Genotypic resistance to quinolone and tetracycline in Salmonella Dublin strains isolated from humans and animals in Brazil. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khan, A.S.; Georges, K.; Rahaman, S.; Abebe, W.; Adesiyun, A.A. Occurrence, risk factors, serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella strains isolated from imported fertile hatching eggs, hatcheries, and broiler farms in Trinidad and Tobago. J. Food Prot. 2021, 85, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khan, A.S.; Georges, K.; Rahaman, S.; Abebe, W.; Adesiyun, A.A. Characterization of Salmonella isolates recovered from stages of the processing lines at four broiler processing plants in Trinidad and Tobago. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khan, A.S.; Georges, K.; Rahaman, S.; Abdela, W.; Adesiyun, A.A. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 1880–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Khan, A.S.; Georges, K.; Rahaman, S.; Abdela, W.; Adesiyun, A.A. Prevalence and serotypes of Salmonella spp. on chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rodrigo, S.; Adesiyun, A.A.; Asgarali, Z.; Swanston, W. Occurrence of selected foodborne pathogens on poultry and poultry giblets from small retail processing operations in Trinidad. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1096–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Andrews, W. Manual of food quality control. 4. Rev. 1. Microbiological analysis. Food and Drug Administration. FAO Food Nutr. Pap. 1992, 14, 1–338. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yoshida, C.E.; Kruczkiewicz, P.; Laing, C.R.; Lingohr, E.J.; Gannon, V.P.; Nash, J.H.; Taboada, E.N. The Salmonella in silico typing resource (SISTR): An open web-accessible tool for rapidly typing and subtyping draft Salmonella genome assemblies. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hyatt, D.; Chen, G.L.; Locascio, P.F.; Land, M.L.; Larimer, F.W.; Hauser, L.J. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, B.; Zheng, D.; Jin, Q.; Chen, L.; Yang, J. VFDB 2019: A comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D687–D692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alcock, B.P.; Raphenya, A.R.; Lau, T.T.Y.; Tsang, K.K.; Bouchard, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Huynh, W.; Nguyen, A.V.; Cheng, A.A.; Liu, S.; et al. CARD 2020: Antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2020, 48, D517–D525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, D.H.; Hyeon, J.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, S.J.; Jeon, S.E.; Choi, S.W.; Hong, W.T.; Song, C.S.; Lee, S.W. Close genetic relationship between Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from patients with diarrhoea and poultry in the Republic of Korea. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, e68–e70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Almeida, F.; Medeiros, M.I.; Kich, J.D.; Falcao, J.P. Virulence-associated genes, antimicrobial resistance and molecular typing of Salmonella Typhimurium strains isolated from swine from 2000 to 2012 in Brazil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 120, 1677–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Pearce, M.E.; Alikhan, N.F.; Dallman, T.J.; Zhou, Z.; Grant, K.; Maiden, M.C.J. Comparative analysis of core genome MLST and SNP typing within a European Salmonella serovar Enteritidis outbreak. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2018, 274, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pightling, A.W.; Pettengill, J.B.; Luo, Y.; Baugher, J.D.; Rand, H.; Strain, E. Interpreting whole-genome sequence analyses of foodborne bacteria for regulatory applications and outbreak investigations. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Guibourdenche, M.; Roggentin, P.; Mikoleit, M.; Fields, P.I.; Bockemuhl, J.; Grimont, P.A.; Weill, F.X. Supplement 2003–2007 (No. 47) to the White-Kauffmann-Le Minor scheme. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, P.; Liu, Q.; Luo, H.; Liang, K.; Yi, J.; Luo, Y.; Hu, Y.; Han, Y.; Kong, Q. O-serotype conversion in Salmonella Typhimurium induces protective immune responses against invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella infections. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chui, L.; Ferrato, C.; Li, V.; Christianson, S. Comparison of molecular and in silico Salmonella serotyping for Salmonella surveillance. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yachison, C.A.; Yoshida, C.; Robertson, J.; Nash, J.H.E.; Kruczkiewicz, P.; Taboada, E.N.; Walker, M.; Reimer, A.; Christianson, S.; Nichani, A.; et al. The validation and implications of using whole-genome sequencing as a replacement for traditional serotyping for a National Salmonella reference laboratory. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Elkenany, R.; Elsayed, M.M.; Zakaria, A.I.; El-sayed, S.A.-E.-S.; Rizk, M.A. Antimicrobial resistance profiles and virulence genotyping of Salmonella enterica serovars recovered from broiler chickens and chicken carcasses in Egypt. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Duc, V.M.; Nakamoto, Y.; Fujiwara, A.; Toyofuku, H.; Obi, T.; Chuma, T. Prevalence of Salmonella in broiler chickens in Kagoshima, Japan in 2009 to 2012 and the relationship between serovars changing and antimicrobial resistance. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Li, T.; Liu, F.; Cheng, Y.; Guo, X.; Wen, G.; Luo, Q.; Shao, H.; Pan, Z.; et al. Characterization of Salmonella spp. isolated from chickens in Central China. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ramirez-Hernandez, A.; Carrascal-Camacho, A.K.; Varon-Garcia, A.; Brashears, M.M.; Sanchez-Plata, M.X. Genotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella spp. strains from three poultry processing plants in Colombia. Foods 2021, 10, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tamang, M.D.; Nam, H.M.; Kim, T.S.; Jang, G.C.; Jung, S.C.; Lim, S.K. Emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-14)-producing nontyphoid Salmonella with reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin among food animals and humans in Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2671–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Aguilar-Montes de Oca, S.; Talavera-Rojas, M.; Soriano-Vargas, E.; Barba-Leon, J.; Vazquez-Navarrete, J.; Acosta-Dibarrat, J.; Salgado-Miranda, C. Phenotypic and genotypic profile of clinical and animal multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica isolates from Mexico. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mendonça, E.P.; Melo, R.T.; Oliveira, M.R.M.; Monteiro, G.P.; Peres, P.A.B.M.; Fonseca, B.B.; Giombelli, A.; Rossi, D.A. Characteristics of virulence, resistance and genetic diversity of strains of Salmonella Infantis isolated from broiler chicken in Brazil. Braz. Vet. Res. 2020, 40, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brinas, L.; Moreno, M.A.; Zarazaga, M.; Porrero, C.; Saenz, Y.; Garcia, M.; Dominguez, L.; Torres, C. Detection of CMY-2, CTX-M-14, and SHV-12 beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli fecal-sample isolates from healthy chickens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2056–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Winokur, P.L.; Brueggemann, A.; DeSalvo, D.L.; Hoffmann, L.; Apley, M.D.; Uhlenhopp, E.K.; Pfaller, M.A.; Doern, G.V. Animal and human multidrug-resistant, cephalosporin-resistant Salmonella isolates expressing a plasmid-mediated CMY-2 AmpC beta-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 2777–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Aviv, G.; Tsyba, K.; Steck, N.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Cornelius, A.; Rahav, G.; Grassl, G.A.; Gal-Mor, O. A unique megaplasmid contributes to stress tolerance and pathogenicity of an emergent Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis strain. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 977–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bogomazova, A.N.; Gordeeva, V.D.; Krylova, E.V.; Soltynskaya, I.V.; Davydova, E.E.; Ivanova, O.E.; Komarov, A.A. Mega-plasmid found worldwide confers multiple antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Infantis of broiler origin in Russia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 319, 108497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Franco, A.; Leekitcharoenphon, P.; Feltrin, F.; Alba, P.; Cordaro, G.; Iurescia, M.; Tolli, R.; D’Incau, M.; Staffolani, M.; Di Giannatale, E.; et al. Emergence of a clonal lineage of multidrug-resistant ESβL-producing Salmonella Infantis transmitted from broilers and broiler meat to humans in Italy between 2011 and 2014. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Yokoyama, E.; Ando, N.; Ohta, T.; Kanada, A.; Shiwa, Y.; Ishige, T.; Murakami, K.; Kikuchi, T.; Murakami, S. A novel subpopulation of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis strains isolated from broiler chicken organs other than the gastrointestinal tract. Vet. Microbiol. 2015, 175, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cartelle Gestal, M.; Zurita, J.; Paz, Y.M.A.; Ortega-Paredes, D.; Alcocer, I. Characterization of a small outbreak of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis that harbour CTX-M-65 in Ecuador. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 20, 406–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Palma, N.; Pons, M.J.; Gomes, C.; Mateu, J.; Riveros, M.; Garcia, W.; Jacobs, J.; Garcia, C.; Ochoa, T.J.; Ruiz, J. Resistance to quinolones, cephalosporins and macrolides in Escherichia coli causing bacteraemia in Peruvian children. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2017, 11, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Tyson, G.H.; Li, C.; Harrison, L.B.; Martin, G.; Hsu, C.H.; Tate, H.; Tran, T.T.; Strain, E.; Zhao, S. A multidrug-resistant Salmonella Infantis clone is spreading and recombining in the United States. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Brown, A.C.; Chen, J.C.; Watkins, L.K.F.; Campbell, D.; Folster, J.P.; Tate, H.; Wasilenko, J.; Van Tubbergen, C.; Friedman, C.R. CTX-M-65 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Salmonella enterica serotype Infantis, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 2284–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Bonnet, R. Growing group of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: The CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Hofacre, C.L.; Fricke, J.A.; Inglis, T. Antimicrobial drug use in poultry. In Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine; Giguère, S., Prescott, J.F., Dowling, P.M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 569–587. [Google Scholar]
  60. Dutil, L.; Irwin, R.; Finley, R.; Ng, L.K.; Avery, B.; Boerlin, P.; Bourgault, A.M.; Cole, L.; Daignault, D.; Desruisseau, A.; et al. Ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg from chicken meat and humans, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tate, H.; Folster, J.P.; Hsu, C.H.; Chen, J.; Hoffmann, M.; Li, C.; Morales, C.; Tyson, G.H.; Mukherjee, S.; Brown, A.C.; et al. Comparative analysis of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase CTX-M-65-producing Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis isolates from humans, food animals, and retail chickens in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00488-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Cheddie, P.; Dziva, F.; Akpaka, P.E. Detection of a CTX-M group 2 beta-lactamase gene in a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate from a tertiary care hospital, Trinidad and Tobago. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2017, 16, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Hindermann, D.; Gopinath, G.; Chase, H.; Negrete, F.; Althaus, D.; Zurfluh, K.; Tall, B.D.; Stephan, R.; Nuesch-Inderbinen, M. Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis from food and human infections, Switzerland, 2010–2015: Poultry-related multidrug resistant clones and an emerging ESBL producing clonal lineage. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Nógrády, N.; Király, M.; Davies, R.; Nagy, B. Multidrug resistant clones of Salmonella Infantis of broiler origin in Europe. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 157, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sköld, O. Resistance to trimethoprim and sulfonamides. Vet. Res. 2001, 32, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kozak, G.K.; Pearl, D.L.; Parkman, J.; Reid-Smith, R.J.; Deckert, A.; Boerlin, P. Distribution of sulfonamide resistance genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates from swine and chickens at abattoirs in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 5999–6001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Zhu, Y.; Lai, H.; Zou, L.; Yin, S.; Wang, C.; Han, X.; Xia, X.; Hu, K.; He, L.; Zhou, K.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance and resistance genes in Salmonella strains isolated from broiler chickens along the slaughtering process in China. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 259, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Arkali, A.; Cetinkaya, B. Molecular identification and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella species isolated from chickens in eastern Turkey. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Maguire, M.; Khan, A.S.; Adesiyun, A.A.; Georges, K.; Gonzalez-Escalona, N. Closed genome sequence of a Salmonella enterica serotype Senftenberg strain carrying the mcr-9 gene isolated from broken chicken eggshells in Trinidad and Tobago. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2021, 10, e0146520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tyson, G.H.; Li, C.; Hsu, C.H.; Ayers, S.; Borenstein, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Tran, T.T.; McDermott, P.F.; Zhao, S. The mcr-9 Gene of Salmonella and Escherichia coli is not associated with colistin resistance in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00573-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sefton, A.M. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance: Their clinical relevance in the new millennium. Drugs 2002, 62, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sosa, A.d.J.; Byarugaba, D.K.; Amábile-Cuevas, C.F.; Hsueh, P.-R.; Kariuki, S.; Okeke, I.N. Antimicrobial Resistance in Developing Countries; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; pp. 1–554. [Google Scholar]
  73. Alam, S.B.; Mahmud, M.; Akter, R.; Hasan, M.; Sobur, A.; Nazir, K.N.H.; Noreddin, A.; Rahman, T.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Rahman, M. Molecular detection of multidrug resistant Salmonella species isolated from broiler farm in Bangladesh. Pathogens 2020, 9, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Van, T.T.; Chin, J.; Chapman, T.; Tran, L.T.; Coloe, P.J. Safety of raw meat and shellfish in Vietnam: An analysis of Escherichia coli isolations for antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 124, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Paterson, D.L.; Bonomo, R.A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: A clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 657–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Akinola, S.A.; Mwanza, M.; Ateba, C.N. Occurrence, genetic diversities and antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella serovars isolated from chickens. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 3327–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Ammar, A.M.; Abdeen, E.E.; Abo-Shama, U.H.; Fekry, E.; Kotb Elmahallawy, E. Molecular characterization of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes among Salmonella serovars isolated from broilers in Egypt. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kaniga, K.; Trollinger, D.; Galán, J.E. Identification of two targets of the type III protein secretion system encoded by the inv and spa loci of Salmonella Typhimurium that have homology to the Shigella IpaD and IpaA proteins. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 7078–7085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Chen, L.M.; Kaniga, K.; Galán, J.E. Salmonella spp. are cytotoxic for cultured macrophages. Mol. Microbiol. 1996, 21, 1101–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hensel, M.; Shea, J.E.; Waterman, S.R.; Mundy, R.; Nikolaus, T.; Banks, G.; Vazquez-Torres, A.; Gleeson, C.; Fang, F.C.; Holden, D.W. Genes encoding putative effector proteins of the type III secretion system of Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 are required for bacterial virulence and proliferation in macrophages. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Cirillo, D.M.; Valdivia, R.H.; Monack, D.M.; Falkow, S. Macrophage-dependent induction of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system and its role in intracellular survival. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Galyov, E.E.; Wood, M.W.; Rosqvist, R.; Mullan, P.B.; Watson, P.R.; Hedges, S.; Wallis, T.S. A secreted effector protein of Salmonella Dublin is translocated into eukaryotic cells and mediates inflammation and fluid secretion in infected ileal mucosa. Mol. Microbiol. 1997, 25, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gibson, D.L.; White, A.P.; Rajotte, C.M.; Kay, W.W. AgfC and AgfE facilitate extracellular thin aggregative fimbriae synthesis in Salmonella Enteritidis. Microbiology 2007, 153, 1131–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Yoo, A.Y.; Yu, J.E.; Yoo, H.; Lee, T.H.; Lee, W.H.; Oh, J.I.; Kang, H.Y. Role of sigma factor E in regulation of Salmonella Agf expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 430, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Collinson, S.K.; Doig, P.C.; Doran, J.L.; Clouthier, S.; Trust, T.J.; Kay, W.W. Thin, aggregative fimbriae mediate binding of Salmonella Enteritidis to fibronectin. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Borsoi, A.; Santin, E.; Santos, L.R.; Salle, C.T.; Moraes, H.L.; Nascimento, V.P. Inoculation of newly hatched broiler chicks with two Brazilian isolates of Salmonella Heidelberg strains with different virulence gene profiles, antimicrobial resistance, and pulsed field gel electrophoresis patterns to intestinal changes evaluation. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 750–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Den Bakker, H.C.; Moreno Switt, A.I.; Govoni, G.; Cummings, C.A.; Ranieri, M.L.; Degoricija, L.; Hoelzer, K.; Rodriguez-Rivera, L.D.; Brown, S.; Bolchacova, E.; et al. Genome sequencing reveals diversification of virulence factor content and possible host adaptation in distinct subpopulations of Salmonella enterica. BMC Genomics 2011, 12, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Siddiky, N.A.; Sarker, M.S.; Khan, M.S.R.; Begum, R.; Kabir, M.E.; Karim, M.R.; Rahman, M.T.; Mahmud, A.; Samad, M.A. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from chicken at wet markets in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Campioni, F.; Moratto Bergamini, A.M.; Falcão, J.P. Genetic diversity, virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from food and humans over a 24-year period in Brazil. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Amini, K.; Salehi, T.; Nikbakht Brujeni, G.; Ranjbar, R.; Amini, J.; Ashrafganjooei, S. Molecular detection of invA and spv virulence genes in Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from human and animals in Iran. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 4, 2202–2210. [Google Scholar]
  91. Huehn, S.; La Ragione, R.M.; Anjum, M.; Saunders, M.; Woodward, M.J.; Bunge, C.; Helmuth, R.; Hauser, E.; Guerra, B.; Beutlich, J.; et al. Virulotyping and antimicrobial resistance typing of Salmonella enterica serovars relevant to human health in Europe. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2010, 7, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Aslam, M.; Checkley, S.; Avery, B.; Chalmers, G.; Bohaychuk, V.; Gensler, G.; Reid-Smith, R.; Boerlin, P. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella serovars isolated from retail meats in Alberta, Canada. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. O’Regan, E.; Quinn, T.; Frye, J.G.; Pages, J.M.; Porwollik, S.; Fedorka-Cray, P.J.; McClelland, M.; Fanning, S. Fitness costs and stability of a high-level ciprofloxacin resistance phenotype in Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis: Reduced infectivity associated with decreased expression of Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Gunn, J.S.; Ryan, S.S.; Van Velkinburgh, J.C.; Ernst, R.K.; Miller, S.I. Genetic and functional analysis of a PmrA-PmrB-regulated locus necessary for lipopolysaccharide modification, antimicrobial peptide resistance, and oral virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 6139–6146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tamayo, R.; Ryan, S.S.; McCoy, A.J.; Gunn, J.S. Identification and genetic characterization of PmrA-regulated genes and genes involved in polymyxin B resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 6770–6778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Eswarappa, S.M.; Panguluri, K.K.; Hensel, M.; Chakravortty, D. The yejABEF operon of Salmonella confers resistance to antimicrobial peptides and contributes to its virulence. Microbiology 2008, 154, 666–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Nilsson, A.I.; Zorzet, A.; Kanth, A.; Dahlström, S.; Berg, O.G.; Andersson, D.I. Reducing the fitness cost of antibiotic resistance by amplification of initiator tRNA genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6976–6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Andersson, D.I.; Hughes, D. Antibiotic resistance and its cost: Is it possible to reverse resistance? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 10 00570 g001 550
Figure 1. VFDB accessions (virulence) versus ARO accessions (AMR) (A–E).
Figure 1. VFDB accessions (virulence) versus ARO accessions (AMR) (A–E).
Microorganisms 10 00570 g001
Table
Table 1. The distribution of serovars of Salmonella isolates from various sources based on in silico analysis.
Table 1. The distribution of serovars of Salmonella isolates from various sources based on in silico analysis.
No. of Strains of Salmonella Detected from the Following:
SerovarsHatcheryFarmProcessing PlantPluck Shop aSupermarket a
Aberdeen00110
Alachua00100
Albany04810
Anatomy00500
Caracas00030
Chester00002
Enteritidis00900
Fresno10000
Gaminara03000
Infantis011900
Javiana0010171
Kentucky807123
Liverpool00100
Manhattan00070
Mbandaka00100
Molade00001
Montevideo00021
Oranienburg01000
Schwarzengrund00710
Senftenberg10021
Soerenga01000
Virchow00100
Weltevreden00100
Sub-total102061469
a Retail outlets comprised pluck shops and supermarkets.
Table
Table 2. Antimicrobial class and genes detected in 146 Salmonella isolates were used in this study.
Table 2. Antimicrobial class and genes detected in 146 Salmonella isolates were used in this study.
Antimicrobial Class and Genes Detected a
PatternAminoglycosideDisinfectantCephalosporinPeptideSulphonamideNumber of Isolates (%)Serovar (n, %)
Pattern 1aph(4)-IaqacEDelta1blaCTX-M-65-sul16 (4.2)Infantis (6, 100.0)
aac(3)-IV
Pattern 2aph(3′)-IaqacEDelta1--sul11 (0.7)Infantis (1, 100.0)
aph(4)-Ia
aac(3)-IV
Pattern 3aph(3′)IaqacEDelta1blaCTX-M-65-sul14 (2.8)Infantis (4, 100.0)
aph(4)-Ia
aac(3)-IV
Pattern 4-qacEDelta1--sul11 (0.7)Senftenberg (1, 100.0)
Pattern 5aac(6′)-Iaa----7 (4.9)Manhattan (7, 100.0)
Pattern 6aac(6′)-Iy----2 (1.4)Aberdeen (2, 100.0)
Pattern 7---mcr-9.1-1 (0.7)Senftenberg (1, 100.0)
Total20 (14.9)12 (9.0)10 (7.5)1 (0.7)12 (9.0)22 (16.1)
a Of a total of 146 isolates subjected to CARD analyzes, AMR genes were detected in 22 isolates shown, 121 isolates possessing the core gene golS (regulator of a multidrug efflux pump) were not included in the table and three isolates were negative for resistance genes (Liverpool, Mbandaka, and Oranienburg).
Table
Table 3. Frequency of ARO accessions detected in this study.
Table 3. Frequency of ARO accessions detected in this study.
Distribution of AROs among the Various Sampling Levels
ARO Name aNo. of AROsOverall Frequency (%) bHatcheryFarmProcessing PlantRetail Outlet
aac(3)-IV117.501100
aac(6‘)-Iaa74.80007
aac(6‘)-Iy21.40011
aph(3‘)-Ia53.40500
aph(4)-Ia117.501100
blaCTX-M-65106.801000
mcr-9.110.71000
qacEDelta1128.201101
sul1128.201101
Total71 159110
a Antibiotic-resistant ontology name in accordance with the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) software. b A total of 71 ARO counts were detected in 146 isolates.
Table
Table 4. Detection of the blaCTX-M-65 gene, other resistance genes, and virulence genes in S. Infantis.
Table 4. Detection of the blaCTX-M-65 gene, other resistance genes, and virulence genes in S. Infantis.
BioSampleIsolate No. aPhenotypic AMR Using the Disk Diffusion Method b,c,dGenotypic Characteristics e
PTECEAMPHSFOther Resistance Genes Detected fVirulence Factors
SAMN25867756F 17SRRRSRSqacEDelta1agf/csg
aph(4)-Iabcf
aac(3)-IVlpf
sul1TTSS (SPI-1 encode)
TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN25867757F 22SRRRSRSqacEDelta1agf/csg
aph(4)-Iabcf
aac(3)-IVlpf
sul1TTSS (SPI-1 encode)
TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN14677229F 11SRRRSRSqacEDelta1agf/csg
aph(4)-Iabcf
aac(3)-IVlpf
sul1TTSS (SPI-1 encode)
TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN14677211F 32SRRRSRSaph(3′)-Iaagf/csg
qacEDelta1bcf
aph(4)-Ialpf
aac(3)-IVTTSS (SPI-1 encode)
sul1TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN14677232F 36SRRRSRSaph(3′)-Iaagf/csg
qacEDelta1bcf
aph(4)-Ialpf
aac(3)-IVTTSS (SPI-1 encode)
sul1TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN14677210F 2 SSSSSSSqacEDelta1agf/csg
aph(4)-Iabcf
aac(3)-IVlpf
sul1TTSS (SPI-1 encode)
TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN14677203F 4SRRRSSRqacEDelta1agf/csg
aph(4)-Iabcf
aac(3)-IVlpf
sul1TTSS (SPI-1 encode)
TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN14677209 UWI-F30SSSSSSSaph(3′)-Iaagf/csg
qacEDelta1bcf
aph(4)-Ialpf
aac(3)-IVTTSS (SPI-1 encode)
sul1TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN14677207UWI-F9SRSRSSSqacEDelta1agf/csg
aph(4)-Iabcf
aac(3)-IVlpf
sul1TTSS (SPI-1 encode)
TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
SAMN14677208UWI-F31SRSRSSSaph(3′)-Iaagf/csg
qacEDelta1bcf
aph(4)-Ialpf
aac(3)-IVTTSS (SPI-1 encode)
sul1TTSS (SPI-2 encode)
TTSS-1 translocated effectors
a All 10 isolates were obtained from broiler farms comprising 7 (70%) cloacal swabs, 2 (20%) water supply (UWI-F30 and UWI-F9), and 1 drag swab of litter (UWI-F31) from where blaCTX-M-65, the only ESβL-resistance gene was detected. b P, penam (amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, 30 µg); TE, tetracycline (doxycycline, 30 µg); CE, cephalosporin (ceftriaxone, 30 µg); AM, aminoglycoside (gentamicin, 10 µg, and kanamycin, 30 µg); PH, phenicol (chloramphenicol, 30 µg); S, sulphonamide (sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim, 23.75 and 1.25 µg); F, fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin, 5 µg). c A total of 146 (151 with controls) isolates of Salmonella were tested for AMR by the disk diffusion method, resistance genes, and virulence genes by WGS where 6.6% (10/151) were positive for ESβL resistance genes (blaCTX-M-65). d S: Susceptible and R: Resistance. e Antimicrobial resistance and virulence analyses were performed using CARD and VFDB. f All isolates belonged to serovar Infantis and contained the golS gene, not shown.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, A.S.; Pierneef, R.E.; Gonzalez-Escalona, N.; Maguire, M.; Li, C.; Tyson, G.H.; Ayers, S.; Georges, K.; Abebe, W.; Adesiyun, A.A. Molecular Characterization of Salmonella Detected along the Broiler Production Chain in Trinidad and Tobago. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030570

AMA Style

Khan AS, Pierneef RE, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Maguire M, Li C, Tyson GH, Ayers S, Georges K, Abebe W, Adesiyun AA. Molecular Characterization of Salmonella Detected along the Broiler Production Chain in Trinidad and Tobago. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(3):570. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Anisa Sarah, Rian Ewald Pierneef, Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona, Meghan Maguire, Cong Li, Gregory H. Tyson, Sherry Ayers, Karla Georges, Woubit Abebe, and Abiodun Adewale Adesiyun. 2022. "Molecular Characterization of Salmonella Detected along the Broiler Production Chain in Trinidad and Tobago" Microorganisms 10, no. 3: 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030570

APA Style

Khan, A. S., Pierneef, R. E., Gonzalez-Escalona, N., Maguire, M., Li, C., Tyson, G. H., Ayers, S., Georges, K., Abebe, W., & Adesiyun, A. A. (2022). Molecular Characterization of Salmonella Detected along the Broiler Production Chain in Trinidad and Tobago. Microorganisms, 10(3), 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop