Next Article in Journal
Inability to Catabolize Rhamnose by Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm1021 Affects Competition for Nodule Occupancy
Next Article in Special Issue
A Plant Endophytic Bacterium Priestia megaterium StrainBP-R2 Isolated from the Halophyte Bolboschoenus planiculmis Enhances Plant Growth under Salt and Drought Stresses
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for Sustainable Production of the Aromatic Dicarboxylic Acid Dipicolinic Acid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plant-Growth-Promoting Potential of PGPE Isolated from Dactylis glomerata L.

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 402460, China
2
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Herbivore Science, Chongqing 402460, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(4), 731; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040731
Submission received: 6 March 2022 / Revised: 26 March 2022 / Accepted: 26 March 2022 / Published: 29 March 2022

Abstract

:
Plant-growth-promoting endophytes (PGPE) are a kind of beneficial microorganisms which could inhabit plant tissues to antagonize certain plant pathogens and promote the host plant’s growth and development. At present, many studies have confirmed the mutualistic effect of endophytes with plants, but there are few systematic studies on beneficial roles between endophytes and Dactylis glomerata, especially on the PGPE characteristics of the forage and environmental restoration plant. This study aimed to isolate PGPE from D. glomerata, evaluate their effects on plant growth, and ultimately acquire desirable microbial inoculants for agricultural use. First, endophytes were isolated from D. glomerata by plant re-inoculation experiment, and identified by morphological and molecular analyses. Fixation medium and methods were carried out to assess the nitrogen fixation ability of the strains. Then, the ability to dissolve phosphorus was determined by the Olsen and silicate medium methods; secretory IAA was measured by Salkowski colorimetric method; and the inhibitive effects on phytopathogen were observed by confrontation culture. Twenty-one strains were isolated from four varieties of D. glomerata, among which 14 strains with plant-growth-promoting characteristics were obtained by re-inoculation experiments, including seven endophytic bacteria and seven endophytic fungi. Further evaluation of three selected strains with the most significant PGP attributes were performed by using the pot re-inoculation experiment which revealed that TG2-B derived from Myroides odoratimimus was the most effective plant-growth-promoting agent due to its ability to produce high levels of IAA; the strain Bacillus cereus exhibited the most robust ability in dissolving inorganic phosphorus; and Trichoderma harzianum manifested a conspicuously antagonistic effect against a variety of plant pathogens. For the first time, this study reports the identification of D. glomerata endophytes that were able to promote plant growth and have a considerable antagonistic effects on plant pathogens, which could be considered as microbial inoculants for using in improving crop production and plant disease control.

1. Introduction

Chemical pesticides and synthetic fertilizers play an important role in high-yield crops production, but their excessive and long-term use has foreshadowed looming environmental concerns [1]. It is, therefore, highly desirable to develop environment-friendly and sustainable agricultural practices. Some researchers found that eclectic biological approaches can gain these ends. Microbial agents can substitute for agricultural chemicals, some of which have exhibited notable amelioration to the surrounding environments [2], by providing abundant nutrients to crops and improving soil quality and nutrient cycling [3], and ultimately enhancing crops production [4]. As a type of microbial biological agent, plant endophytes seem to be a veritable biological treasure trove. Researchers have isolated 1172 endophytic isolates from Theobroma cacao of tropical rainforests [5], manifesting that plant endophytes are valuable agricultural resources. Moreover, plant endophytes show overt growth-promoting effects and antimicrobial/antifungal effects on their host plants [6,7]. There is no doubt that endophytes are valuable ecological resources, and studying the interaction between endophytes and plants may play a significant role in promoting the development of agriculture and maintaining ecological stability.
Endophytes were first defined by Bary in 1866 [8] as microorganisms inhabiting plants [8], which are widespread and able to colonize in healthy plant tissues without causing disease symptoms [9]. Residing within plants, plant-growth-promoting endophytes (PGPEs) can dissolve phosphate and organic phosphorus, as exemplified by plant endophytic Pseudomonas isolates that are endowed with a striking phosphorus solubilization ability, effectively providing nitrogen, potassium, and other elements to plants [10]. It is understood that PGPEs produce various plant growth regulators, such as IAA, cytokinin, and gibberellin, that could promote plant growth [11] and provide antimicrobial capability, and increase plant-related antioxidant enzyme activities under environmental adversaries [4]. In addition, Pseudomonas isolates could promote Fe3+ siderophore production [12], induce plant immune pathways by producing (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, ACC) aminase that may decrease ethylene production, and alleviate the damages inflicted by various environmental cues [13]. A recent study investigated the prominent antimicrobial function of PGPEs and their underlying mechanisms whereby plant endophytes elicited by pathogenic fungi are able to activate biosynthetic gene clusters and produce chitinase, secondary metabolites phenazine, polyketone compounds, and siderophores as a multifaceted strategy against plant pathogens [14].
Dactylis glomerata L. is one of the four major graminaceous forage grasses widely distributed in the world, chiefly in Eurasia and North Africa [15]. Because of its high nutritional value, good palatability, and high sugar content for livestock, D. glomerata is regarded as an important fodder crop, providing animal feed, supporting dairy products and meat production in temperate regions [16]. It is also productive and can withstand shade, barrenness, and drought. It has also been used in pasture construction in arid grasslands [17]. Moreover, D. glomerata and its associated microorganisms could effectively treat and restore the soils polluted by petroleum products, mercury, and other heavy metals [18,19,20].
However, to the best of our knowledge, systematic studies on endophytic bacteria and fungi in D. glomerata are still lacking, and the evaluation of endophytic resources in D. glomerata from the perspective of disease resistance is long overdue. In this study, the microorganisms residing in D. glomerata were screened for growth promotion effect on plants. The PGPEs were evaluated for their capability in phosphorus and potassium solubility, nitrogen fixation, IAA secretion, and antimicrobial properties. Further, selected strains were evaluated for their biocontrol potentials through field rust prevention and control tests. Finally, we report the identification of endophytes that could be used as potential plant antibiotic bioinoculants for biological control.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Sampling

In March 2019, a survey was conducted in Rongchang forage germplasm fields, Southwest University, Chongqing, China (105°17′–105°44′ E, 29°15′–29°41′ N). Different varieties of healthy Dactylis seeds were collected, including PI 170344 that came from Turkey, PI 292586 that came from Israel, CF 016352 from Morocco, and “Teyou” from the Beijing Best Grass Industry Co., Ltd. in China. In this area, the average annual rainfall is 1099 mm, the annual accumulative temperature is 6383 °C, the annual photoperiod is 1083 h, the relative humidity is 72%, the average annual temperature is 17 °C, the days exceeding 40 °C are about 15 days (d), the lowest temperature is −4 °C (in January), and the hottest mean temperature is 27 °C (in July). The soil in the experimental site was grey–brown–purple soil and the soil texture was medium loam, with a soil pH of 6.5.

2.2. Isolation and Purification of Endophytes

The samples’ leaves, stems, and roots were cut into 1 cm2 small pieces by sterile scissors, and the plant tissues were washed by running water for three times prior to being immersed in 75% ethanol for 30 s, sodium hypochlorite 2.5% for 5 min, and followed by thorough rinsing with sterile water [21], placed into potato dextrose agar (PDA) with chloramphenicol (0.1 g/L) (Beijing Luqiao, China) for fungal endophytes and Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Beijing Luqiao, China) for bacterial endophytes, and cultured at 25 °C for one week. Each set was repeated three times. Isolated microorganisms grown on the plates were purified by dilution separation method as previously described [22].

2.3. Pot Re-Inoculation Experiment

We isolated 21 endophytes inoculated into potted D. glomerata and found that 14 endophytic bacteria and fungi had better induction characteristics for plants. In order to screen endophytic strains with PGP characteristics, we performed pot re-inoculation experiments. For the formal re-inoculation in D. glomerata, the selected endophytic bacteria and fungi were cultured on media in Erlenmeyer flasks, which were placed on an incubator with shaking, at 160 rpm, at 25 °C for 48 h. D. glomerata seeds disinfection was performed as described above for plant tissues. The seeds were then sown in pots, with the planting depth around 1 cm. The diameter and height of a pot was 22.5 cm and 16 cm, respectively, filled with about 3 kg soil, and placed in an outdoor environment. The soil characterization and climatic conditions refer to the description in Section 2.1. The plants were irrigated with microbial solutions at a concentration of 105−6 CFU mL−1 every 7 d. A range of growth indexes, including leaf length, root length, fresh weight of root, and fresh weight of aboveground parts, were assayed after 60 d.

2.4. Morphological, Physiological Characterization of Endophytes

The 14 strains with plant-growth-promoting characteristics obtained by re-inoculation experiments were further evaluated. After 3–5 days of post-inoculation on LB or PDA medium, the color, size, shape, transparency and uniformity, and other morphology of the colonies of each isolate were measured. The shape of cells were examined as described by Khalifa, Sadia Bashir [23,24].

2.5. Molecular Identification of Entophytes

Molecular identification using bacterial 16s rRNA gene and fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rDNA was conducted by PCR and sequence analysis. Each PCR reaction was performed in a 50 μL volume consisting of 2 μL (0.5–10.0 ng) templates DNA, 1 μL upstream and downstream primers, respectively, 25 μL, 2 × PCR Taq Master Mix, 21 μL ultrapure water. The oligo primers designed for universal amplification of a bacterial 16S rRNA fragment were 27f (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492 r (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The general primers of the fungi ITS rDNA were ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [25]. The PCR program was carried out on a ProFlex PCR 4484075 thermal cycler (USA). The PCR was conducted at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 90 s. The amplified products were fractionated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under a UV transilluminator before being sequenced. Multiple sequence alignment was conducted by using the Clustal X 1.8 software package. Phylogenetic trees were generated by the neighbor-joining method using MEGA, and confidence was tested by bootstrap analysis with 1000 repeats.

2.6. Qualitative Detection of Nitrogen Fixation Capacity

The strains were subjected to the test for their potential in nitrogen fixation. The active strains were inoculated onto nitrogen fixation liquid medium (Ashby’s Nitrogen-Free Fluid medium, Shanghai Rebio Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 25 °C for 2–3 d. The strains that had survived on the nitrogen fixation medium were re-inoculated onto a new set of nitrogen fixation media. The experiment was repeated three times. The growth rate of the strains represents their ability in nitrogen fixation [26].

2.7. Qualitative Test of Potassium Solubility

The activated strains were inoculated onto silicate medium (Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) [27] at 25 °C for 2–3 d. When clear zones around the colonies were found, the strains were re-inoculated onto a fresh silicate medium. The persistence of clear zones on silicone medium represents their ability in dissolving potassium.

2.8. Quantitative Estimation of Phosphorus Solubilization

Quantitative analysis of phosphorus solubilization was conducted following the approach of Olsen [28]. The Erlenmeyer flasks with the culture of strains on phosphorus medium or in water as negative control were oscillated at 150 rpm at 25 °C for 5 d, and each set was repeated three times. At the end of oscillation, the suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm, and the phosphorus content was measured by Mo–Sb colorimetry [29].

2.9. Quantitative Determination of Secretory Auxin

Quantitative tests of IAA production were performed on discolored strains after performing the Salkowski colorimetric method as previously described [30]. Briefly, the culture suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, from which 1 mL supernatant was taken to a new tube containing 50 μL phosphoric acid and 2 mL Salkowski colorimetric solution. The control group contains supernatant only. The test tubes were then placed in the dark for 30 min, prior to measurement of OD530 value. A standard curve of IAA content was calculated according to absorbance, which was used to estimate IAA concentrations in samples [31].

2.10. Antimicrobial Activities of Endophytes

Antimicrobial experiments were performed using the confrontation method [20,32] with some modification. In brief, endophytes and pathogen (Cladosporium tenuissimum, Fusarium tricinctum, Colletotrichum cliviicola, Pantoea agglomerans, Nigrospora oryzae, Phoma exigua) were inoculated onto a same plate, nutrient agar–potato dextrose agar (NA–PDA; 1:1) mix plate at 25 °C for 3–5 days. Endophytes were placed at a distance of 25 mm from the pathogens which were inoculated on the center of the plate. Plates without endophytes were used as controls. Antimicrobial rate was measured and recorded by using the following formula after the pathogenic fungi in the control plate covered the plate. The experiment was carried out in three independent replicates.
Antimicrobial   rate ( % ) = Control   group   diameter treatment   group   diameter Control   group   diameter × 100 %

2.11. Effect of the Endophytic Inoculation on Rust Resistance of D. glomerata

The effect of endophyte inoculation on rust resistance of D. glomerata was studied in the field experiment. Four strains of endophytic bacteria (TG2-B, CFY1-B, 344G1-B, and 344JI-B) were selected from the previous screening. The seeds were stored in Chongqing Key Laboratory of Herbivore Science, Southwest University. Sterilized seeds were germinated on the filter paper with good moist ventilation and sterilization to germinate; the seedlings thus obtained were soaked in liquid cultures of TG2-B, CFY1-B, 344G2-F, and 344JI-B for two hours, while seedlings treated with sterile water served as controls (CK). The inoculated seedlings were then transplanted into the experimental field, and the root and leaf of D. glomerata were irrigated with endophytes solutions with an overdiluted concentration of 105–106 CFU mL−1 every 7 days. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, and repeated three times, with an area of 1 m2 in each plot. In May 2020, the incidence of rust disease in the field was assessed. The five-points sampling method was used in each plot, and 10 strains were checked in each plot to record the incidence. The disease grade assessment of D. glomerata was based on the standard of rust investigation records concerning the national standard of the Wheat Stripe Rust Forecast Investigation Standard issued by China in 1995 [33].
Incidence   rate = Number   of   plants   infected   with   rust Investigate   the   total   strain × 100 %
Disease   index = Σ   ( number   of   rust   plants   at   all   levels ) ×   Disease   grade   ( value ) Total   number   of   plants   investigated   ×   Superlative   value × 100 %
Relative   protection   effects =   Control   disease   index     treatment   disease   index   Control   disease   index × 100 %

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Experimental data were displayed as average ± standard deviation (SD) values. The significant differences among the processing means were evaluated with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by multiple sample comparison, and variables of replication were followed by the LSD test at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Pot Re-Inoculation Strains Experiment

To discover the growth-promotion effect of inoculating different bacteria and fungi on plants, we isolated 21 endophytes from D. glomerata (Table 1). Among them, seven endophytic bacteria and seven fungi with PGP ability were selected. Leaf length, root length, and fresh weight and dry weight of D. glomerata were measured by pot re-inoculation. It was found that endophytic bacteria and fungi had significant growth-promotion effects on D. glomerata (Figure 1) as the root length, aboveground part fresh weight, and fresh root of D. glomerata were significantly different from the control group (p < 0.05). Analysis of variance revealed that the lengths of leaves and roots of D. glomerata inoculated with bacteria were overall greater than those inoculated with fungi, but the root length, plant height, and fresh weight of D. glomerata inoculated with fungi were significantly higher than those of the control group. The values of root length, plant height, fresh weight of roots, and aboveground parts of D. glomerata were the largest in TG2-B, while those of root lengths, leaf lengths, and fresh weights were better in TG2-F and 344G2-F.

3.2. Morphological Identification of Endophytic Fungi and Bacteria

Seven D. glomerata bacterial endophytes were isolated, purified, and transferred to LB medium and cultured at 25 °C for 3–5 d for morphology observation. As shown in Supplementary Figure S1, TG2-B was 1.5–2.0 mm in diameter, with its Gram staining being negative. Its colonies appeared shiny, yellowish, and slightly moist, with round and smooth margins. The four bacterial strains, including CFY1-B, TG1-B, TJ1-B, and 586G1-B, were white, opaque, and shiny, round but without smooth edges, showing similar shape in morphology; 344G1-B closely resembled 344J1-B, but was slightly different from the four strains mentioned above, which could probably be Bacillus spp.
Seven purified D. glomerata endophytic fungi were transferred to PDA medium and cultivated at 25 °C for 3–5 d. As is evident in Supplementary Figure S1, 344G1-F, 344G2-F, and 344G3-F might be T. harzianum, as their colonies were green on the front and white or brown on the back. These cultures showed rapid growth, covering the entire plate over 3–5 d. Spores were green under microscopic examination. TG2-F and TG3-F were presumably Fusarium spp., due to their white fluffy colonies, slightly red at the center and crescent-shaped spores. The abaxial surface of 586G1-F and 586G2-F was white and darkened around the fourth day after inoculation, with branched septate hyphae but without discernible spores under microscopy, which could be speculated as Aspergillus spp.

3.3. Molecular Identification of Endophytes

The 16s rRNA gene sequences of 344G1-B, 344J1-B, 586G1-B, CFY1-B, TG1-B, TG2-B, and TJ1-B have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers of OK493783, OK493788, OK493785, OK493786, OK4937854, OK493789, and OK493787 (Table 2, Figure 2). Among them, 344G1-B, 344J1-B, CFY1-B, TG1-B and TJ1-B, and 586G1-B were closely aligned with B. mycoides strain SeITE01 (KF280239), B. pumilus strain HTI3 (MK521055), B. cereus strain IIF4SW (KY218870), B. pseudomycoides strain BS20 (KR063200), and B. cereus strain ATCC 14579 (AE016877) with 99% identity, respectively. In contrast, TG2-B was more similar to M. odoratimimus TH-19 (HF947513). In addition, seven endophytic fungi (344G1-F, 344G2-F, 344G3-F, 586G1-F, 586J1-F, TG2-F, and TG3-F) were clustered into T. harzianum (344G1-F, 344G2-F, 344G3-F), A. fumigatus (586G1-F, 586J1-F) and F. proliferatum (TG2-F, TG3-F) (Table 2, Figure 2). BLAST algorithm showed that 344G1-F (OK445674), 344G2-F (OK445675), and 344G3-F (OK445674) were similar to T. harzianum isolate Ctccsj-g-hb40547 (KY750324), with 99% homology, whereas 586G1-F (OK448258) and 586J1-F (OK448259) were highly similar to A. Fumigatus (99%); TG2-F (OK448256) and TG3-F (OK448257) were similar to F. proliferatum isolates A2S1-D96 (KJ767073).

3.4. Qualitative and Quantitative Determination of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium in Endophytic Fungi and Bacteria

As shown in Table 3, most of the tested bacteria and fungi were found to have nitrogen fixation abilities. Specifically, the endophytic bacteria 344G1-B, 344G2-B, 586G1-B, CFY-B, and TJ1-B and fungi 344G2-F, 344G3-F, 586G1-F, and TG2-F were able to fix nitrogen. With regards to potassium-dissolving test, significant variations were observed between bacterial endophytes, and relatively weak ability was also observed in fungal strains 344G1-F, 586G1-F, and TG2-F. Phosphorus dissolution amount was tested by molybdenum–antimony anti colorimetry, bringing about diverse results among various endophytes. ANOVA analysis determined that the phosphorus dissolution ability of bacteria was generally better than that of fungi. The highest phosphorus dissolution volume was observed in bacterial strains CFY1-B, TG1-B, TG2-B, and TJ1-B, while 344G3-F and TG2-F performed best among fungi isolates.

3.5. Determination of Auxin Production

After activating endophytic fungi, bacterial strains were subjected to Salkowski colorimetry for quantitative analysis of auxin secretion. It was shown that the biosynthesis of IAA in D. glomerata was diverse under different treatments of endophytic fungi and bacteria. As shown in Table 3, the secretion of IAA induced by the endophytic bacteria group was significantly higher than that induced by fungi. The endophytic fungi 344G1-F and 344G2-F showed the maximum IAA induction, whereas 586G1-F, 586G2-F, TYG2-F, and TYG3-F were not able to induce IAA.

3.6. Antimicrobial Activity of Endophytic Bacteria and Fungi in D. glomerata

To identify the endophytes of D. glomerata with the potential capacity in preventing and controlling the prevalence of plant diseases, plate confrontation culture method was used to evaluate antagonistic effects of 14 strains of endophytic bacteria and fungi from D. glomerata against six different plant pathogens. It was shown that fungal isolates displayed more remarkable disease-inhibitory effects than bacterial isolates. In particular, 344G2-F exhibited the strongest antimicrobial effect, with rates of 100%, 78%, 100%, 100%, 90.86%, and 78.85% against P. exigua, F. tricinctum, C. tenuissimum isolate, P. agglomerans, N. oryzae, and C. cliviicola strains, respectively (Figure 3).

3.7. Field Rust Test

Fungal endophyte 344G2-F displayed the best control effect (Table 4), with rust incidence of 18.60 ± 0.65%, disease index of 8.43 ± 0.05%, and relative protection effects reaching 62.29 ± 0.12%. In order to explore the control of field rust by selecting endophytic bacteria and fungi of D. glomerata, a range of parameters, including the incidence, disease index, and relative control effect of rust, were measured in the experimental site during May 2020, coincidental with the most common occurrence of rust. As shown in Table 4, after inoculation with screened endophytic bacteria and fungi, the incidence of rust on D. glomerata was less than 30% on average, in contrast to the incidence of the control group at 38.69 ± 0.21%. The disease indexes of inoculation groups were no more than 14%, in contrast to 22.21 ± 0.08% in the control group. Fungal endophyte 344G2-F demonstrated the best effectiveness of rust prevention and control, for its rust incidence was 18.60 ± 0.65%, disease index was 8.43 ± 0.05%, and relative protection effects was 62.29 ± 0.12%.

4. Discussion

Plant endophytes are an indispensable resource for the development of microbial agents for biological controls. Our results displayed that 14 out of the 21 strains of endophytic bacteria and fungi isolated from different parts of D. glomerata were endowed with growth-promoting effect. In the present study, the dominant residing microorganisms within D. glomerata include B. pseudomycoides, B. pumilus, B. mycoide, and B. cereus, which fostered stimulation to plant growth. With conspicuous promotion effects on plant growth, Bacillus spp. was found in ginseng in abundance [34], of which the major strain was identified as B. pumilus. Likewise, Bacillus spp. were identified as one of the endophytes of Elaeagnus spp. in metagenomic studies [18]. Among other similar studies, an endophytic strain, B. mycoide, was identified in Salicornia bigelovii [35], and Hassan showed that B. cereus isolated from Teucrium polium L. leaves was the most advantageous, and identical to CFY1-B, 586G1-B, TJ1-B, TG1-B. Handri isolated over twenty endophytic filamentous fungi from Vicia faba L., sesame, soybean rhizosphere, and rhizobia and identified them to be Fusarium spp. [36], while Lubna obtained F. proliferatum from alfalfa [37]. Endophytic T. harzianum strains were isolated from Aloe vera, but only T. viride strain was found in D. glomerata by Rozpdek [38]. Therefore, this study represents the first report of endophytic T. harzianum in D. glomerata.
Our study aims at screening for potential plant-growth-promoting microbial inoculants, for which a pot re-inoculation experiment was conducted together with the purified microbial agents that were used to test the ability in phosphorus and potassium dissolution, nitrogen fixation, and IAA secretion. Antimicrobial experiments were performed to select for potential plant-growth-promoting inoculants, which were examined by field rust disease resistance tests. Ultimately, TG2-B, CFY1-B, and 344G2-F strains were identified as the potential inoculants for their growth-promoting and antimicrobial activities, among which TG2-B was most effective in inducing plant growth in D. glomerata, as its inoculation significantly promoted growth in plant height, root length, root fresh weight, and aboveground part fresh weight by 2×, 2.5×, 6×, and 3×, relative to the uninoculated ones, respectively (p < 0.05). The M. odoratimimus strains isolated from the rhizosphere were reported to enhance the dry weight, fresh weight, plant height, and other biomass factors in mung bean [39]. Similar observations have been made in wheat, where M. odoratimimus strain overtly increased the stem length, root length, fresh weight, and dry weight [40,41].
In the antimicrobial experiment, TG2 (M. odoratimimus) was found to suppress Nigrospora oryzae, but such an effect was not known in M. odoratimimus. Instead, M. odoratimimus was found to exert a strong inhibitory effect on tobacco scab associated with black star disease. In controlling rust in D. glomerata, the disease incidence of the group inoculated with TG2-B was 19.12%, which was significantly lower than 38.69% in the control group (p < 0.05). Although the distinction on culture media was not obvious, the field study provided conspicuous evidence. It was speculated that high IAA secretion and phosphorus solubility of TG2-B can comprehensively improve rust immunity, while its metabolites can degrade mycotoxins [42], alleviating the damages inflicted by pests and diseases [32].
Our present study demonstrated that CFY1-B had the best phosphorous-solubilization effect. Microbial soluble phosphorus is a promising biofertilizer [32]. Soil phosphorus mainly exists in the form of minerals and cannot be directly absorbed by plants. Some endophytes can convert the soil non-absorbable minerals into bioavailable phosphorus, which can be absorbed and utilized by plants, thereby reducing the use of chemical fertilizers [43]. CFY1-B had a significant growth-promoting effect on D. glomerata, second only to TG2-B. In our present work, CFY1-B (B. cereus) showed the best phosphorus solubilization effect, with dissolvable phosphorus content of 129.53 mg/L. It also exhibited its ability to produce IAA and nitrogen fixation. B. cereus was reported to have a high phosphate-solubilizing index and could secrete IAA [32]. It was reported that an unknown Bacillus species showed nitrogen fixing, phosphate-solubilizing, potassium-solubilizing, and significant growth-promotion effect on D. glomerata [44]. In the present study, we have clearly demonstrated that B. cereus is a potential plant microbial agent that could be used to promote D. glomerata growth, as antagonistic experiments have significantly displayed its inhibitory effects on Fusarium tricinctum and Nigrospora oryzae. The field test showed that the incidence rate of D. glomerata rust was 38.69%, and that of CFY1-B inoculum group was 28.43% (p < 0.05), which had a significant effect on disease control. The underlying mechanism of antimicrobial activity in B. cereus may lie in its production of secondary metabolites, for instance, bacteriocins and lipopeptide antibacterial substances including peptide antibiotics and lysozymes [45].
The 344G2-F (T. harzianum) not only showed the strongest antimicrobial activity against plant pathogens, but it also significantly promoted plant growth in D. glomerata, as was evident by the measurement of plant root length, plant height, root fresh weight, and aboveground fresh weight. Significant increase in soybeans yield was observed upon the inoculation with T. harzianum, which was attributed to the strain’s ability in pathogen-inhibitory, IAA production, and phosphorus and potassium solubilization, as well as nitrogen fixation [46]. In the present study, 344G2-F has the ability to secrete IAA, dissolve phosphorus, fix nitrogen, and dissolve potassium. It is therefore likely that 344G2-F functions in a similar manner to T. harzianum.
The antagonism experiments showed that the inhibition rate of endophytic fungi on pathogen was generally better than that of endophytic bacteria. Magnaporthe spp. showed the strongest antifungal rate against plant pathogens, among which 344G2-F had significant antibacterial effects against P. exigua, F. tricinctum, C. tenuissimum Cooke, N. oryzae, and C. cliviicola with high antimicrobial rates of 100%, 78%, 100%, 91%, and 78% (p > 0.05), respectively. Previous results have shown that Trichoderma viride had 71.76% antifungal rate against P. exigua, and Trichoderma viride had a significant antifungal effect on Fusarium spp.; the inhibition rate of Fusarium nygama reached 78.80% [47]. T. harzianum showed a significant inhibitory effect on Fusarium spp. infecting bananas [48]. T. harzianum was effective against C. graminicola, showing maximum antifungal effect up to 76.47% [49]. When T. harzianum was antagonized against parasitic mango anthracnose, the severity of disease was reduced by 87.90% [50]. Moreover, a few studies have investigated that C. tenuissimum Cooke and N. oryzae were antagonized by T. harzianum. As confirmed by field trial, 344G2-F demonstrated the highest effectiveness in alleviating the rust damage to D. glomerata, with the symptomatic incidence of 18.60%, which was significantly lower than the uninoculated group of 38.69% (p < 0.05). Our results are well in line with previous studies on wheat, where the incidence of rust disease was substantially lowered as the result of T. harzianum inoculation [51]. Overall, our study found that 344G2-F showed a promising level of antagonistic effect on a variety of plant pathogens, indicating that Trichoderma spp. could be used as an environment-friendly microbial agent without detrimental effects on the environment.

5. Conclusions

Our present study may provide a foundation for the development and utilization of endophytic bacteria and fungi in D. glomerata. It has displayed the interaction between the forage plant D. glomerata and its endophytes: plants provide a suitable growth environment for endophytes, and endophytes secrete some beneficial substances that promote plant growth. It is revealed that the dominant microorganisms residing in D. glomerata are Bacillus, Trichoderma, Fusarium, and Aspergillus, as these predominant niches have already been occupied by half of the fungal and bacterial endophytes from D. glomerata tissues. These strains contribute to the enhancement of plant growth and crop yield, with the effects of ameliorating plant nutrition, secreting auxin, and inhibiting phytopathogens. B. cereus, T. harzianum, and M. odoratimimus were ultimately selected as excellent microbial inoculants for PGP plant growth promotion and antiphytopathogen, which may replace, at least in part, chemical fertilizers and pesticides over time, and significantly reduce a series of environmental pollutions from production to application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10040731/s1, Figure S1: culture morphology of endophytic bacteria and fungi in D. glomerata.

Author Contributions

Y.H. contributed to performing the experiment selection and design, supporting experimental funds, and reviewing the manuscript. C.Z. contributed to implementing the data analyses, writing the manuscript, and performing the experiment. K.C. contributed to performing the experiment and reviewing the manuscript. M.L. contributed to achieving the experiment and reviewing and editing the manuscript. J.Z. contributed to fulfilling the data analyses and paper polishing and reviewing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901929), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2021jcyj-msxmX1021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Chengli Fan for putting forward new ideas and suggestions for our experiments, Dandan Zhou for helping us to screen endophytic fungi from D. glomerata, Wenting Du for helping us to revise the article and put forward suggestions, and Chaoran Liu who helped us revise and review the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Nan, W.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, C.; Wang, F.; Li, P.; et al. Endophytic microbes Bacillus sp. LZR216-regulated root development is dependent on polar auxin transport in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1075–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, L.; Li, D.; Shao, Y.; Adni, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Comparative Analysis of Soil Microbiome Profiles in the Companion Planting of White Clover and Orchard Grass Using 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Data. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Karthik, C.; Oves, M.; Thangabalu, R.; Sharma, R.; Santhosh, S.; Arulselvi, P.I. Cellulosimicrobium funkei-like enhances the growth of Phaseolus vulgaris by modulating oxidative damage under Chromium(VI) toxicity. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Khan, A.L.; Waqas, M.; Khan, A.R.; Hussain, J.; Kang, S.-M.; Gilani, S.A.; Hamayun, M.; Shin, J.-H.; Kamran, M.; Al-Harrasi, A.; et al. Fungal endophyte Penicillium janthinellum LK5 improves growth of ABA-deficient tomato under salinity. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 2133–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Arnold, A.E.; Mejía, L.C.; Kyllo, D.; Rojas, E.I.; Maynard, Z.; Robbins, N.; Herre, E.A. Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15649–15654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Smith, E.F. Further Evidence That Crown Gall of Plants Is Cancer. Science 1916, 43, 871–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Smith, V.A.; Hindley, J.; Smith, J.H.V.A. Effect of agrocin 84 on attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to cultured tobacco cells. Nature 1978, 276, 498–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vettraino, A.M.; Paolacci, A.; Vannini, A. Endophytism of Sclerotinia pseudotuberosa: PCR assay for specific detection in chestnut tissues. Mycol. Res. 2005, 109, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Schulz, B.J.E.; Boyle, C.J.C.; Sieber, T.N. (Eds.) Microbial Root Endophytes. In Soil Biology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006; ISBN 978-3-540-33525-2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Eotieno, N.; Lally, R.D.; Ekiwanuka, S.; Elloyd, A.; Eryan, D.; Germaine, K.J.; Dowling, D.N. Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Spaepen, S.; Versées, W.; Gocke, D.; Pohl, M.; Steyaert, J.; Vanderleyden, J. Characterization of Phenylpyruvate Decarboxylase, Involved in Auxin Production of Azospirillum brasilense. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 7626–7633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bagg, A.; Neilands, J.B. Ferric uptake regulation protein acts as a repressor, employing iron(II) as a cofactor to bind the operator of an iron transport operon in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 5471–5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lòpez-Fernàndez, S.; Compant, S.; Vrhovsek, U.; Bianchedi, P.L.; Sessitsch, A.; Pertot, I.; Campisano, A. Grapevine colonization by endophytic bacteria shifts secondary metabolism and suggests activation of defense pathways. Plant Soil 2015, 405, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carrión, V.J.; Perez-Jaramillo, J.; Cordovez, V.; Tracanna, V.; de Hollander, M.; Ruiz-Buck, D.; Mendes, L.W.; van Ijcken, W.F.J.; Gomez-Exposito, R.; Elsayed, S.S.; et al. Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome. Science 2019, 366, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Woltman, A.M.; Van Der Kooij, S.W.; Coffer, P.J.; Offringa, R.; Daha, M.R.; van Kooten, C. Rapamycin specifically interferes with GM-CSF signaling in human dendritic cells, leading to apoptosis via increased p27KIP1 expression. Blood 2003, 101, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Wilkins, P.W.; Humphreys, M.O. Progress in breeding perennial forage grasses for temperate agriculture. J. Agric. Sci. 2003, 140, 129–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farshadfar, M. Evaluation of the Forage Yield and Quality in Some Accessions of Dactylis Glomerata under Irrigated Conditions. Sch. Res. Libr. 2012, 3, 6. Available online: https://www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com/articles/evaluation-of-the-forage-yield-and-quality-in-some-accessions-of-dactylis-glomerata-under-irrigated-conditions.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  18. Borowik, A.; Wyszkowska, J.; Kucharski, M.; Kucharski, J. The Role of Dactylis Glomerata and Diesel Oil in the Formation of Microbiome and Soil Enzyme Activity. Sensors 2020, 20, 3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ortiz, O.; Alcañiz, J. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in Dactylis glomerata L. growing in a calcareous soil amended with sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mei, C.; Chretien, R.L.; Amaradasa, B.S.; He, Y.; Turner, A.; Lowman, S. Characterization of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial Endophytes and Plant Growth Promotion In Vitro and in Greenhouse. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cueva-Yesquén, L.G.; Goulart, M.C.; de Angelis, D.A.; Alves, M.N.; Fantinatti-Garboggini, F. Multiple Plant Growth-Promotion Traits in Endophytic Bacteria Retrieved in the Vegetative Stage From Passionflower. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jamali, H.; Sharma, A.; Roohi; Srivastava, A.K. Biocontrol potential of Bacillus subtilis RH5 against sheath blight of rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani. J. Basic Microbiol. 2019, 60, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khalifa, A.Y.Z.; Alsyeeh, A.-M.; Almalki, M.A.; Saleh, F.A. Characterization of the plant growth promoting bacterium, Enterobacter cloacae MSR1, isolated from roots of non-nodulating Medicago sativa. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bashir, S.; Iqbal, A.; Hasnain, S. Comparative analysis of endophytic bacterial diversity between two varieties of sunflower Helianthus annuus with their PGP evaluation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 27, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ranganayaki, S.; Bahadur, K.; Mohan, C. Microbial fixation of nitrogen in the presence of lanthanum sulphate. J. Basic Microbiol. 1981, 21, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khan, M.S.; Zaidi, A.; Musarrat, J. Response of PSM Inoculation to Certain Legumes and Cereal Crops; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tiggemann, M. Considerations of positive body image across various social identities and special populations. Body Image 2015, 14, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, Y.-Q.; Wang, Y.-H.; Kong, W.-L.; Liu, W.-H.; Xie, X.-L.; Wu, X.-Q. Identification, cloning and expression patterns of the genes related to phosphate solubilization in Burkholderia multivorans WS-FJ9 under different soluble phosphate levels. AMB Express 2020, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mishra, S.K.; Singh, J.; Pandey, A.R.; Dwivedi, N. Indole-3-Acetic Acid Production by the Cyanobacterium Fisherella muscicola NDUPC001. Curr. Sci. 2019, 116, 1233–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chrastil, J. Colorimetric estimation of indole-3-acetic acid. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hassan, S.E.-D. Plant growth-promoting activities for bacterial and fungal endophytes isolated from medicinal plant of Teucrium polium L. J. Adv. Res. 2017, 8, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lii, Q.; SHIMA, Z. Wheat Rust in China; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2002; ISBN 7-109-07347-5. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vendan, R.T.; Yu, Y.J.; Lee, S.H.; Rhee, Y.H. Diversity of endophytic bacteria in ginseng and their potential for plant growth promotion. J. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dai-Jing, L.I.; Yin, Y.; Liu, M.J.; Wei, T.; Guo, J.; Xin, Z.H. Screening and Identification of Endophytic Bacteria from Salicornia Bigelovii. Torr Based on a NRPS Functional Gene Assay. Food Ferment. Ind. 2017, 43, 58. (In China) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hasan, H.A.H. Gibberellin and auxin-indole production by plant root-fungi and their biosynthesis under salinity-calcium interaction. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2002, 49, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bilal, L.; Asaf, S.; Hamayun, M.; Gul, H.; Iqbal, A.; Ullah, I.; Lee, I.-J.; Hussain, A. Plant growth promoting endophytic fungi Asprgillus fumigatus TS1 and Fusarium proliferatum BRL1 produce gibberellins and regulates plant endogenous hormones. Symbiosis 2018, 76, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rozpądek, P.; Wężowicz, K.; Nosek, M.; Ważny, R.; Tokarz, K.; Lembicz, M.; Miszalski, Z.; Turnau, K. The fungal endophyte Epichloë typhina improves photosynthesis efficiency of its host orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata). Planta 2015, 242, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Jimtha, C.J.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Multipotent Plant Probiotic Rhizobacteria from Western Ghats and Its Effect on Quantitative Enhancement of Medicinal Natural Product Biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Boil. Sci. 2016, 88, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kaur, R.; Kaur, S. Plant growth-promoting potential of ‘Myroides gitamensis’ isolated from virgin soils of Punjab. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 2551–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mwakinyali, S.E.; Ming, Z.; Xie, H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P. Investigation and Characterization of Myroides odoratimimus Strain 3J2MO Aflatoxin B1Degradation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 4595–4602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, Y.; Gao, M.; Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Jeon, J.-S.; Qu, N.; Zhang, Y.; He, Z. OsRAR1 and OsSGT1 Physically Interact and Function in Rice Basal Disease Resistance. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yallappa, M.; Savalagi, V.P.; Shruthi, P. Effect of Dual Inoculation of Potassium Solubilizing Bacteria and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on Nutrient Content in Maize Crop. Trends Biosci. 2015, 8, 4402–4405. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stajković-Srbinović, O.; DELIĆ, D.; Kuzmanović, D.; Sikirić, B.; RASULIĆ, N.; Nikolić, B.; Knežević-Vukčević, J. Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) and Meadow Fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) as Affected by Rhizobacteria. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2016, 44, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, L. Identification of A Bacillus cereus and Isolation and Study on Its Antimicrobial Substance. Master’s Thesis, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  46. Martanto, E.A.; Tanati, A.E.; Baan, S.; Tata, H.R.; Murdjoko, A. Effectiveness of biological control of Trichoderma harzianum on soybean leaf rust disease and the production in West Papua Lowland, Indonesia. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2020, 21, 1935–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Parizi, T.E.; Ansari, M.; Elaminejad, T. Evaluation of the potential of Trichoderma viride in the control of fungal pathogens of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) in vitro. Microb. Pathog. 2012, 52, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Thangavelu, R.; Palaniswami, A.; Velazhahan, R. Mass production of Trichoderma harzianum for managing fusarium wilt of banana. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2004, 103, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Manzar, N.; Singh, Y.; Kashyap, A.S.; Sahu, P.K.; Rajawat, M.V.S.; Bhowmik, A.; Sharma, P.K.; Saxena, A.K. Biocontrol potential of native Trichoderma spp. against anthracnose of great millet (Sorghum bicolour L.) from Tarai and hill regions of India. Biol. Control 2020, 152, 104474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alvindia, D.G.; Alvindia, D.G. The antagonistic action of Trichoderma harzianum strain DGA01 against anthracnose-causing pathogen in mango cv. ‘Carabao’. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2018, 28, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sharkawy, H.E.; Tohamey, S.; Khalil, A.A. Combined Effects of Streptomyces viridosporus and Trichoderma harzianum on Controlling Wheat Leaf Rust Caused by Puccinia triticina. Plant Pathol. J. 2015, 14, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Effects of endophytic fungi and bacteria treatment on plant biomass of D. glomerata, different letters on bars mean significantly different at p < 0.05. (b) Seedlings showing differences in root and shoot lengths between control and endophytic fungi and bacteria treatments on D. glomerata seedlings after 60 days grown in pots.
Figure 1. (a) Effects of endophytic fungi and bacteria treatment on plant biomass of D. glomerata, different letters on bars mean significantly different at p < 0.05. (b) Seedlings showing differences in root and shoot lengths between control and endophytic fungi and bacteria treatments on D. glomerata seedlings after 60 days grown in pots.
Microorganisms 10 00731 g001
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining tree deduced through MEGA 7.0 software based on the sequences of 16S and ITS rRNA gene of endophytes; (a) is endophytic bacteria and (b) is endophytic fungi.
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining tree deduced through MEGA 7.0 software based on the sequences of 16S and ITS rRNA gene of endophytes; (a) is endophytic bacteria and (b) is endophytic fungi.
Microorganisms 10 00731 g002
Figure 3. Inhibition rate of endophytic fungi and bacteria: (a) is endophytic bacteria of inhibition rate; (b) is endophytic fungi of inhibition rate. Different letters on bars mean significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Inhibition rate of endophytic fungi and bacteria: (a) is endophytic bacteria of inhibition rate; (b) is endophytic fungi of inhibition rate. Different letters on bars mean significantly different at p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 10 00731 g003
Table 1. Endophytes isolated from different varieties and different parts of Dactylis glomerata.
Table 1. Endophytes isolated from different varieties and different parts of Dactylis glomerata.
Dactylis glomerata Sample NameIsolated Strains (Strain Isolation Site)
BacteriaFungi
PI170344344J1-B(stem)344G1-F(root)
344G1-B(root)344G2-F(root)
344G3-F(root)
344G4-F(root)
344Y1-F(leaf)
344Y2-F(leaf)
344Y3-F(leaf)
PI292586586Y1-B(leaf)586G1-F(root)
586G1-B(root)586J1-F(stem)
586J2-F(stem)
CF016352CFY1-B(leaves)
TeyouTG1-B(root)TG1-F(root)
TG2-B(root)TG2-F(root)
TJ1-B(stem)TG3-F(root)
Total813
Notes: “()” represents endophytes isolated from different parts of Dactylis glomerata.
Table 2. The molecular identification of endophytic microbial isolates from D. glomerata.
Table 2. The molecular identification of endophytic microbial isolates from D. glomerata.
Microbial IsolatesNearest Homolog Sequences (Accession Number)Sequences Identity (%)Accession Number
Bacterial endophytes344G1-BBacillus mycoides strain SeITE01 (KF280239)99OK493783
344J1-BBacillus pumilus strain HTI3(MK521055)99OK493788
586G1-BBacillus cereus strain GE16(KY312802)98OK493785
CFY1-BBacillus cereus strain IIF4SW (KY218870)99OK493786
TG1-BBacillus pseudomycoides strain BS20 (KR063200)99OK493784
TG2-BMyroides odoratimimus strain T45 (KF758445)99OK493789
TJ1-BBacillus cereus strain ATCC 14579 (AE016877)99OK493787
Fungal endophytes344G1-FTrichoderma harzianum isolate CTCCSJ-G-HB40547 (KY750324)93OK445674
344G2-FTrichoderma harzianum isolate CTCCSJ-G-HB40547 (KY750324)93OK445675
344G3-FTrichoderma harzianum isolate CTCCSJ-G-HB40547 (KY750324)93OK445676
586G1-FAspergillus fumigatus isolate HT OC176(MN634562)100OK448258
586J1-FAspergillus fumigatus isolate HT OC176(MN634562)100OK448259
TG2-FFusarium proliferatum isolate A2S1-D96 (KJ767073)98OK448256
TG3-FFusarium proliferatum isolate A2S1-D96 (KJ767073)98OK448257
Table 3. Test of phosphorus, potassium, and nitrogen fixation and auxin production ability of endophytic bacteria and fungi.
Table 3. Test of phosphorus, potassium, and nitrogen fixation and auxin production ability of endophytic bacteria and fungi.
Microbial IsolatesPhosphorus Quantitative Test (mg/L)Nitrogen Fixation CapacityPotassium Dissolving CapacityIAA (μg/m)
344G1-B60.52 ± 0.50 g++10.21 ± 0.98 b
344J1-B20.54 ± 0.21 k++6.11 ± 0.53 c
586G1-B70.97 ± 0.44 f++5.38 ± 0.35 c
CFY1-B129.53 ± 0.35 a++5.73 ± 0.44 c
TG1-B121.55 ± 2.6 c-+4.55 ± 0.65 cd
TG2-B90.15 ± 0.02 e-+52.57 ± 3.73 a
TJ1-B126.36 ± 0.35 b++2.43 ± 0.58 d
344G1-F23.83 ± 0.15 j--5.44 ± 1.20 b
344G2-F32.82 ± 0.60 h++10.46 ± 2.40 a
344G3-F29.70 ± 0.22 i++4.87 ± 0.67 c
586G1-F11.09 ± 1.06 m+-0 e
586J1-F13.44 ± 1.97 l-+0 e
TYG2-F29.65 ± 0.10 i--0 e
TYG3-F21.61 ± 0.07 k++0 e
Notes: Values within the same column with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) by LSD test, values are means ± SE (n = 6). -,+, denotes no, and have nitrogen fixation capacity and potassium dissolving capacity, respectively.
Table 4. Incidence of experimental rust in 2020.
Table 4. Incidence of experimental rust in 2020.
Microbial IsolatesIncidence %Disease Index %Relative Protection Effects %
344J1-B25.47 ± 0.57 c13.60 ± 0.04 b38.74 ± 0.03 d
CFY1-B28.43 ± 0.58 b13.22 ± 0.25 c41.44 ± 0.03 c
TG2-B19.12 ± 0.57 d8.79 ± 0.09 d60.56 ± 0.38 b
344G2-F18.60 ± 0.65 d8.43 ± 0.05 e62.29 ± 0.12 a
CK38.69 ± 0.21 a22.21 ± 0.08 a0.00 e
Notes: Values within the same column with different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) by LSD test, values are means ± SE (n = 3). Dactylis glomerata seedlings were inoculated separately: 344J1-B, CFY-B, TG2-B, 344G2-F. Seedlings treated with sterile water served as controls (CK).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Cai, K.; Li, M.; Zheng, J.; Han, Y. Plant-Growth-Promoting Potential of PGPE Isolated from Dactylis glomerata L. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040731

AMA Style

Zhang C, Cai K, Li M, Zheng J, Han Y. Plant-Growth-Promoting Potential of PGPE Isolated from Dactylis glomerata L. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(4):731. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Chaowen, Kai Cai, Mengyuan Li, Jiaqi Zheng, and Yuzhu Han. 2022. "Plant-Growth-Promoting Potential of PGPE Isolated from Dactylis glomerata L." Microorganisms 10, no. 4: 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop