Next Article in Journal
Nasal Microbiota, Olfactory Health, Neurological Disorders and Aging—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
CAMPYAIR, a New Selective, Differential Medium for Campylobacter spp. Isolation without the Need for Microaerobic Atmosphere
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Conditions to Improve Biomass Production by Submerged Culture of Ganoderma sp.

by
Catalina Rosales-López
*,†,
Alejandro Vargas-López
,
Mariana Monge-Artavia
and
Miguel Rojas-Chaves
Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología, Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica (ITCR), Cartago 159-7050, Costa Rica
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
PhD. Doctorado en Ciencias Naturales para el Desarrollo (DOCINADE) ITCR-UNA-UNED, Costa Rica.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(7), 1404; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071404
Submission received: 19 May 2022 / Revised: 28 June 2022 / Accepted: 2 July 2022 / Published: 12 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
In the present investigation, the conditions for in vitro submerged culture of a native strain of Ganoderma sp. were evaluated. Different culture medium ingredients, inoculum concentrations, inoculation methods, configuration, and airflows were evaluated to improve biomass production. The addition of thiamine and olive oil to the culture medium increased biomass production, as well as inoculating 6.6 g/L since there are no significant differences in biomass growth according to inoculum origin (pre-inoculum, discs or with spores). The best configuration of the 3 L stirred tank bioreactor was using three impellers and a porous air diffuser of 0.25 volume per volume per minute (vvm), the dry biomass concentration was 22.6 g/L after 12 days of cultivation at 30 °C, much higher than other investigations. This study provides relevant information for pilot-scale production of this fungus for future secondary metabolites. The culture medium was optimized, and it was defined that the concentration and origin of the inoculum did not influence the growth of Biomass, but the aeration and the configuration of the system allowed the establishment of protocols for the cultivation of Ganoderma sp.

1. Introduction

The genus Ganoderma contains many large species of bracket fungi belonging to the phylum Basidiomycota. Most of the species are saprophytes and grow on decomposing trunks [1]. Over 250 species of Ganoderma have been described worldwide, most of them classified based on pleomorphic characteristics [2]. In Costa Rica, nine species of this genus have been identified morphologically: G. australe, G. amazonense, G. dorsale, G. longistipitatum, G. oerstedii, G. orbiforme, G. perzonatum, G. resinaceum, and G. stipitatum [3,4]. The main taxonomic characteristic of this genus is the double-walled basidiospore. The inner wall is thick and yellowish-brown with numerous endosporic projections, and the external wall is thin, smooth, and hyaline [5]. Further characterization of Ganoderma is based on its microstructures; a molecular analysis is difficult because of the lack of gene sequences from neotropical collection zones.
Ganoderma is recognized for its medicinal value. It is used to treat diseases, including gastric ulcers, chronic hepatitis, hypertension, nephritis, asthma, arthritis, bronchitis, insomnia, cancer, diabetes, and anorexia [6]. Among the many bioactive compounds present are steroids, lignins, lectins, ganomycins, vitamins, nucleosides, nucleotides, alkaloids, amino acids, polysaccharides, and triterpenes [7]. Special attention has been given to the last two groups of compounds mentioned due to their effects on conditions relevant to human health.
Ganoderic acids are a group of oxygenated triterpenes derived from lanosterol, which have been isolated from fruiting bodies, mycelium, and spores of Ganoderma sp. This family of compounds is numerous due to the possible substitutions on carbons 3, 7, 11, 12, 15, 22, 23, 24, and 25. Pharmacological effects that have been tested for these molecules include cytotoxicity against hepatic cancer cells, cholesterol-synthesis inhibition, antihistaminic activity, α-glucosidase inhibition, and antihypertensive activity [7].
On the other hand, the most important polysaccharides produced by Ganoderma sp. are β-D-glucans, which are constituted mainly by glucose monomers linked by β-1,3 bonds. Ramifications on the structures are made by β-1,6 bonds. These molecules have been isolated from fruiting bodies, mycelium, and spores, but also in spent culture media. Previous studies have shown the following effects for these polysaccharides: immunomodulatory activity, antioxidant capacity, anti-inflammatory effects, hepatoprotective activity, and triglyceride reduction effects [6].
In submerged cultures, both ganoderic acids and polysaccharides can be obtained. The production of these compounds depends on the biological and physicochemical characteristics of the fermentation, such as the culture medium used, agitation, temperature, and pH, among others [1,6,7]. In recent years, there have been attempts to increase the production of these bioactive compounds in vitro using biotechnology. As a first stage, the fungus is grown in an artificial culture medium under controlled conditions [8].
The objective of this research was to evaluate different components of the culture medium and to define the optimum inoculum density and inoculation technique to maximize biomass production of Ganoderma sp. in flasks and bioreactors using a strain collected in the Central Valley of Costa Rica.

2. Materials and Methods

The trials were carried out at the Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, at the Centro de Investigación Biotecnología, (CIB).

2.1. Source and Maintenance of the Strain of Ganoderma sp.

The strain of Ganoderma used in this study was identified molecularly and morphologically as Ganoderma curtisii and was provided by the Fungal Collection of the Centro de Investigación en Innovación Forestal (CIF) at the Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica (accession number CIIBI-007A, biodiversity permit R-CM-ITCR-005-2019-OT). The strain was grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (CM-0139, OXOID) in 10 cm Petri plates in an incubator (Digisystem) at 30 °C for 8 days and subcultured weekly by transferring segments of mycelium and culturing under the same conditions described.

2.2. Optimization of Culture Medium

The effects of olive oil, calcium and copper salts, and thiamine (vitamin B1) on Ganoderma sp. biomass concentration in a liquid medium were evaluated using a three-factor completely randomized factorial design, with two levels (presence or absence) of each of the three factors, and with three replicates per treatment combination (Table 1). Olive oil, calcium and copper salts (as a single factor), and thiamine, were added to a base medium containing 30.0 g/L glucose, 5.0 g/L peptone, 5.0 g/L yeast extract, 0.5 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L K2HPO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4 7H2O [9,10]. pH was adjusted to 5.5 with 1 M HCl or NaOH before sterilization. Each component of the culture medium was sterilized separately at 121 °C for 20 min, except thiamine, which was filtered through 0.22 µm. Solutions were mixed aseptically after cooling to room temperature.
Experiments were conducted in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. The culture medium (50 mL) was inoculated with three 8 mm disks of biomass grown on PDA for 8 days. Cultures were maintained at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) in an orbital shaker at 100 rpm for 14 days. The final biomass was recovered by vacuum filtration and dried at 65 °C for 48 h before weighting.
The best culture medium (medium C, Table 2), as defined by the factorial design, was tested against a supplemented medium (C with 1% v/v olive oil) and a commercial medium (Potato Dextrose Broth, PDB) using a one-way ANOVA. Growth conditions and biomass recovery techniques were the same as described before.

2.3. Selection of the Inoculation Method

The effect of the inoculation method on the final biomass of Ganoderma sp. In a liquid medium was evaluated. Three methods of inoculation were evaluated in triplicate: mycelial disks from eight-day cultures [13], a spore suspension [14], and the pre-inoculation method. For the spore suspension, 10 mL of sterile water was added to an eight-day culture on a Petri plate. After mixing with the culture, the water was collected and added to a fresh medium in an Erlenmeyer flask. For the pre-inoculation method, mycelia from an eight-day-old flask culture were filtered with a sieve and added to cultures at a concentration of 20 g (fresh weight)/L.
For each experiment, cultures were grown at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) in 50 mL of medium with agitation at 100 rpm for 14 days. Biomass was recovered after 14 days, and dry weight was measured.

2.4. Determination of the Optimum Inoculum Concentration

To determine the best inoculum concentration for maximum growth of the fungus, three inoculum concentrations were tested in triplicate: 6.6 g/L [11], 10.0 g/L, and 20.0 g/L. The pre-inoculation method was used to inoculate each treatment. Cultures were maintained at 100 rpm at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) for 14 days. The biomass was recovered, and dry weight was determined. A growth index was determined as an additional response variable using the following equation:
G I = X f X 0 X 0
where:
  • GI: growth index (g/g).
  • Xf: final dry biomass weight (g).
  • X0: initial dry biomass weight (g).

2.5. Growth Kinetics

After defining the optimum culture medium composition, inoculum type, and inoculum concentration, growth kinetics of Ganoderma sp. in a liquid medium were evaluated. Dry biomass concentration was measured by taking three flasks at days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. Data were graphed over time to determine the specific growth rate (h−1). Mathematical models were fit to the data by non-linear regression and the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm (tolerance of 1.0 × 10−8) using the software CurveExpert Professional version 2.6.5. The growth curve was used to determine when to transfer flask cultures to the bioreactor.

2.6. Culture in the Bioreactor

A 3 L (2 L working volume) Applikon Biotechnology bioreactor was used. The culture medium in the bioreactor was stirred by three impellers: marine propeller (lower), pitched-blade turbine (middle), and Rushton turbine (upper). Baffles were not used during fermentations. The bioreactor was inoculated with 10 g/L of fresh biomass from 8-day flask cultures. The initial dissolved oxygen concentration was 100%. Cultures were maintained at 30 °C with 350 rpm agitation for 12 days.

2.7. Determination of Airflow Rate

Compressed air (30 psig) was introduced through a porous diffuser. Two airflow rates (0.25 and 1.0 vvm) were tested in duplicate. The volumetric oxygen mass transfer coefficient (kLa) was determined before inoculation using the dynamic method with four replicates. Biomass was collected after 12 days, and dry weight was determined.

2.8. Statistical Analyses

All experiments used a completely randomized design. The response variable for all experiments was the dry biomass concentration (g dry weight/L). Analyses were performed in Minitab 19 with a 95% (α = 0.05) confidence level. Equal variances were assumed for all analyses, and the normality of residuals was verified.

3. Results

Dry biomass concentration from each medium is shown in Table 2. Biomass concentration was the highest in treatment “C”, which contained olive oil and thiamine. In contrast, biomass dry weight concentration was lowest in treatment “E”, which contained salts and thiamine.
The effects on biomass concentration of olive oil and thiamine were statistically significant, as seen in Table 3 and the interactions between olive oil–thiamine (Table 4) and salts–thiamine (Table 5). Moreover, the dry biomass concentration was higher in cultures grown in a medium with added olive oil and thiamine than in a medium without these components. The interactions between factors show that cultures grown in a medium containing olive oil produced more biomass when thiamine was also added to the medium. In contrast, cultures grown in a medium with added salts (CuSO4 and CaCl2) produced a lower concentration of biomass when thiamine was also present in the medium.
Due to the important increase in biomass concentration of Ganoderma sp. with the addition of olive oil to the culture medium, the effect of adding oil at 1% v/v (9.1 g/L) was examined. Figure 1 shows that the growth of the organism was 32% greater in supplemented medium (C2) than in the medium selected in the factorial design (C), and 240% greater than in commercial medium (PDB), according to Tukey’s pairwise comparison (α = 0.05).

3.1. Inoculation Method

The pairwise comparison showed no significant differences between the inoculation methods, with a 95% confidence level. Figure 2 shows the effect of the inoculation method on the dry weight of Ganoderma sp. mycelia. However, the initial inoculum concentration was different for each method used and may have affected the final dry weight of the mycelium, as demonstrated by [15].
Other studies have shown that the size, homogeneity, and concentration of the inoculum may affect the growth phases of this fungus. Researchers have used different inoculation techniques for Ganoderma, but pre-inoculation is the most used [16]. Although biomass production was not significantly different among inoculation methods, pre-inoculation resulted in more homogeneous growth and better distribution and was therefore selected for use in later experiments.

3.2. Inoculum Concentration

Figure 3 shows the effect of the inoculum concentration on the dry biomass concentration and growth index. The dry biomass concentration (black bars) tended to increase with increased inoculum concentration. In contrast, the growth index (striped bars) decreased as the inoculum concentration increased. According to Tukey’s pairwise comparison analysis (α = 0.05), the dry biomass concentration did not differ significantly among the three treatments, while the growth index in the treatment inoculated with 6.6 g/L was significantly higher than in the treatment inoculated with 20.0 g/L.

3.3. Growth Kinetics

In Table 6, specific growth rate of Ganoderma sp. in the submerged culture obtained from different growth models.
Using an inoculum concentration of 10 g fresh weight/L, growth kinetics were determined for Ganoderma sp. cultures in liquid medium in flasks. The curve of dry biomass concentration over time (Figure 4) showed the absence of an adaptation or latent phase. The beginning of the stationary phase was seen at 300 h (12 days) of growth.

3.4. Growth in the Bioreactor Airflow Rate Tests

Statistical assumptions of the normality of residuals were fulfilled for the experimental designs used in this section. The equal variance assumption was fulfilled for the dry biomass concentration, but not for kLa, in which case the data were analyzed by Welch’s ANOVA with the Games–Howell pairwise comparison. Figure 5 shows the dry biomass concentration and kLa for the airflow rate experiments in a stirred tank bioreactor with a working volume of 2 L, equipped with a porous air diffuser and three impellers (marine propeller, pitched blade turbine, and Rushton, from the bottom to the top). Dry biomass concentration (black bars) was similar in the two treatments, while kLa (striped bars) increased slightly with a greater airflow rate. The pairwise comparison showed that neither of the results was statistically significant (α = 0.05), which suggests that the airflow rate did not exert any significant effect on the growth of the fungus and the mass transfer coefficient.
The effect of the airflow rate on the growth of Ganoderma sp. in stirred tank bioreactors has been previously studied. Tang, Y. et al. (2003) [17] obtained a maximum concentration of 15.62 g dry biomass/L after eight days of culture with a kLa of 78.2 h−1 (0.5 vvm, 200 rpm); however, biomass concentration decreased to 11.3 g/L after 15 days. Moreover, using an airflow rate of 1.0 vvm (96.0 h−1), biomass production remained constant at 13.5 g/L after approximately 10 days. The dry biomass concentration obtained in this study was 70% greater than that reported by Wagner R. et al. (2003) [14] using the same airflow rate (relative to the working volume, vvm), but the kLa was nearly three times lower (96.0 h−1 vs. 36.5 h−1).
Although the growth of Ganoderma sp. in the bioreactor was not significantly affected by the airflow rate, the dry biomass concentration obtained in this work surpassed that reported in the literature for some batch mode (and even fed-batch mode) fermentations. Table 7 shows the dry biomass concentrations reported in recently published articles and the conditions used.

4. Discussion

The positive effect of olive oil on the growth of Ganoderma sp. in a liquid medium has been previously reported. Chang, M. et al. (2006) and Yorulmaz, A. et al. (2013) [16,25] found that the addition of olive oil to the culture medium at concentrations of 3.0 g/L and 4.0 g/L, respectively, caused an increase in the final biomass concentration. Yorulmaz, A. et al. (2013) [25] found that the addition of some vegetable oils (including olive oil) and fatty acids, such as oleic acid, the principal component of olive oil, increased biomass concentration by 65% and 130%, respectively. On the other hand, the authors of [26] studied the fatty acid and sterol content of different species of Ganoderma and found that oleic acid, palmitic acid, linoleic acid, and stearic acid are the major fatty acids present in the fungal biomass. Considering this, the positive effect of olive oil on the biomass growth of Ganoderma sp. might be because it provides certain fatty acids or their precursors required by the organism.
The importance of thiamine as an enzymatic cofactor in the central metabolism of many fungi has been established [12]; however, few authors have studied its effect directly on the growth of the genus Ganoderma. Thiamine is routinely added to liquid culture medium used in research on the growth of Ganoderma sp., but its requirement as an essential nutrient has not been demonstrated. In the present study, the addition of this vitamin to the culture medium improved biomass production in submerged culture. Jo, W. et al. (2009) [18] also reported positive effects of thiamine on the growth of G. applanatum in a semisolid medium at a concentration of 0.1 mg/L.
The effect of interactions between olive oil and thiamine, or inorganic salts (CuSO4 and CaCl2) and thiamine, on the growth of Ganoderma sp. has not been previously reported. Table 4 summarizes the results of Tukey’s pairwise comparison for the olive oil–thiamine interaction. Pairs of treatments sharing the same letter (a, b, or c) were not statistically different from each other. The dry biomass concentration obtained in treatments with high levels of both olive oil and thiamine was significantly higher than in treatments including only one of the two factors. These results suggest a synergy between thiamine and the fatty acids present in olive oil; however, the biochemical explanation is unclear.
In contrast, the interaction between salts and thiamine observed in Table 5 was different. The dry biomass concentration obtained in treatments that included salts and thiamine together was not statistically different from the concentrations obtained in treatments without those components. Moreover, in the treatments with a high level of salts, the addition of thiamine did not change the dry biomass concentration significantly. This suggests an antagonistic interaction between the salts (CuSO4 and CaCl2) and thiamine. In a recent publication, Schnellbaecher A. et al. (2019) [12] reviewed factors that affect the stability of vitamins in the most common culture medium. They reported that copper salts tend to increase the velocity of thermal degradation of thiamine in a solution, particularly when phosphate buffers are used. As for the influence of the calcium salts, there are no reports of direct interactions between calcium ions in solutions containing thiamine. Therefore, the effects observed in this study were likely due to reactions between thiamine and copper ions.
With respect to the addition of olive oil to the culture medium, the effect of increasing oil concentration to 1% v/v (9.1 g/L) was examined. The growth of the organism was 32% greater in supplemented medium (C2) and these results coincide with those reported by Fei, Y. et al. (2019) [27] and Wei, Z. et al. (2014) [28] for olive oil concentrations of 1% v/v and 3% v/v, respectively. Thus, it is possible to affirm that the C2 medium was adequate for the growth of Ganoderma sp. in the submerged culture.
Fang, Tang, and Zhong (2002) [15] studied the influence of inoculum concentration on the growth and morphology of Ganoderma sp. in a liquid medium and the effect on the production of polysaccharides and ganoderic acids. These authors reported maximum dry biomass concentrations after eight days of culture. After 14 days, the dry biomass concentrations were estimated to be 9.4, 10.2, 8.1, and 8.6 g/L for cultures inoculated with 1.4, 3.4, 6.6, and 13.4 g/L, respectively.
As seen in Figure 3, the growth index was highest (43.10 g/g) for cultures inoculated with 6.6 g/L (0.33 g/L dry biomass). A higher growth index (133.29 g/g) was obtained by Fang, Tang, and Zhong (2002) [15] for cultures inoculated with 1.4 g/L (0.07 g/L dry biomass). However, the final dry biomass concentration (9.4 g/L) was lower than that obtained in the present study (17.26 g/L).

4.1. Growth Kinetics

Predicted values for the specific growth rate for the exponential Gompertz and Richards models were of the same order of magnitude, while the logistic model generated a value of one order of magnitude greater. The mathematical model with the lowest values for the standard error of the regression and corrected Akaike information was selected. The use of these criteria instead of the coefficient of determination (r2) to analyze the goodness of fit of nonlinear regression models has been discussed previously [20]. The Gompertz model best described the growth of Ganoderma sp. In a liquid medium and predicted a specific growth rate of 0.0087 ± 0.0019 h−1. Spiess, A. et al. (2010) [20] used the logistic model to describe the variation in biomass concentration over time. These authors found a specific growth rate of 0.019 h−1 for a “wild type” strain in culture conditions similar to those of this study. The growth rate obtained by these authors is higher than that obtained in our study with the Gompertz model (0.0087 h−1) but is similar to the estimate from the logistic model (0.0139 h−1).
Modeling the growth of the Ganoderma sp. culture in liquid medium generates valuable information about the performance of the culture system; however, the physiological meaning of the growth parameters obtained from non-structured and non-segregated models should be interpreted with caution. The growth mechanisms of filamentous fungi in liquid medium are quite different from those of unicellular organisms, such as bacteria or yeasts, and the assumptions used to construct many of the models are not always adequately fulfilled [29,30]. For this reason, it is particularly important to evaluate statistically diverse mathematical models for the description and prediction of biomass growth of filamentous fungi in liquid medium.

4.2. Growth in the Bioreactor

Kim, H. et al. (2006) [21] studied the individual effects of agitation speed and airflow rate on the growth of G. resinaceum in a 3.0 L (working volume) bioreactor with a single Rushton turbine. The dry biomass concentration obtained after 15 days of culture was greater using an airflow rate of 0.5 vvm than with 1.0 vvm (18.5 g/L vs. 17.9 g/L). In our study, dry biomass concentration after 12 days of growth using an airflow rate of 1.0 vvm (22.8 g/L) was 44% higher than that reported by Tang, Y.-J. (2003) [17] after the same time (15.9 g/L). A possible explanation may be found in the culture medium composition used in the two studies. The medium used by Kim, H.M. (2006) [21] lacked certain components necessary for adequate fungal growth [28], such as KH2PO4, MgSO4 7H2O, and thiamine.
In contrast to the previously mentioned research, in this study, the increased airflow rate did not affect the final dry biomass concentration or the volumetric oxygen mass transfer coefficient. We suggest a possible explanation as follows: increasing the airflow rate did not improve biomass concentration because kLa did not improve either, which means that the organism experienced the same oxygen availability in both conditions (0.25 and 1.00 vvm). Since Ganoderma sp. is a strictly aerobic fungus, oxygen concentration is a critical parameter for submerged growth and may even be the limiting substrate. On the other hand, we suggest that kLa did not improve with a higher airflow rate because the bottom impeller (marine propeller) flooded at higher airflow rates. Salmon, D. et al. (2016) [22] proposed a correlation for the estimation of flooding conditions for various impellers. Using the equation for a down-pumping Lightnin A310 impeller (similar to the one we used), we obtained a critical airflow rate of 0.3 vvm at 350 rpm, which is close to the lower value used in this work (0.25 vvm). This means that beyond 0.3 vvm, the bottom impeller entered the flooding regime, in which gas bubbles were not dispersed correctly, negatively affecting the oxygen transfer rate.
One final aspect to consider is the obstruction of the air diffuser by fungal growth on its surface. When fermentations were concluded, fungal biomass was observed around the diffuser; the mass had a compact consistency and was difficult to remove. It was not possible to determine when the mass formed; however, since oxygen concentration fell to 0% in less than four days (for all fermentations), it probably grew to a critical size during the first days of culture. Moreover, in the final days of the fermentation, the fungal biomass tended to accumulate over the motor shaft and the bioreactor walls and impeded the homogenization of the medium by agitation. This situation has been previously reported for submerged cultures of filamentous fungi and is a problem that affects biomass quantification by sampling and fermentation yield calculations [31].
Growth in this study was lower than that obtained by Tang, Y.-J., and Zhu, L.-W. (2010) [11]; however, these two research groups used a considerably larger amount of substrate than that used in the present study. In contrast, the results of this research are similar to those obtained by Salmon, D. et al. (2016) [22] and Tang, Y.-J.; Zhong, J. [23], using a fed-batch mode of operation. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of a porous air diffuser for submerged cultures of Ganoderma sp. in stirred tank bioreactors and its effect on the mass transfer coefficient.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the addition of thiamine and olive oil to the culture medium significantly improved biomass production of a strain of Ganoderma native to Costa Rica. Although the inoculum concentration and method of inoculation did not influence biomass growth, the study contributes toward the standardization of inoculation protocols for Ganoderma sp. Fermentations in stirred tank bioreactors using three impeller types and a porous air diffuser generated 22.6 g/L of dry biomass after 12 days of culture with less air consumption (0.25 vvm). However, the problem of biomass adhesion to the surface of the air diffuser should be resolved in future research. This work will contribute to the establishment of high-density cultures of Ganoderma sp. in stirred tank bioreactors for research purposes, as well as for the efficient and cost-effective production of secondary metabolites on a pilot scale.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.R.-L. and M.R.-C.; methodology, C.R.-L.; validation, C.R.-L., A.V.-L. and M.M.-A.; formal analysis, C.R.-L. and M.R.-C.; investigation, C.R.-L., A.V.-L. and M.M.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, C.R.-L., A.V.-L., M.M.-A. and M.R.-C.; supervision, C.R.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Research of the Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica through grant no. 1510104.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Legarda, L.X.; Echevarria, A.C.; Sánchez, S.F. Producción de polisacáridos a partir de Ganoderma sp., aislado en la región andina. Rev. Colomb. Biotecnol. 2015, 17, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. López-Peña, D.; Samaniego-Rubiano, C.; Morales-Estrada, I.; Gutiérrez, A.; Gaitán-Hernández, R.; Esqueda, M. Características morfológicas de Ganoderma subincrustatum silvestre y cultivada de Sonora, México. Sci. Fungorum 2019, 49, e1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ruiz-Boyer, A. The family Ganodermataceae (Aphyllophorales) in Costa Rica. La familia Ganodermataceae (Aphyllophorales) en Costa Rica. Tropical Diversity Origins, Maintenance, and Conservation. In Proceedings of the ATB & OTS Symposium and Annual Meeting Abstracts, San José, Costa Rica, 15–20 June 1997. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ruiz-Boyer, A.; Rodríguez-González, A. Lista preliminar de hongos (Ascomycota y Basidiomycota) y mixomicetos (Myxomycota) de la Isla del Coco, Puntarenas, Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2020, 68, S33–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cid-Martínez, M.A.; Gallardo-Velázquez, K.; Rosique-Gil, J.E.; Domínguez-Rodríguez, V.I.; Focil-Monterrubio, R.L. Cuantificación de las esporas de ganoderma del aire exterior en la ciudad de Villahermosa, Tabasco, México. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 2019, 35, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lu, J.; He, R.; Sun, P.; Zhang, F.; Linhardt, R.J.; Zhang, A. Molecular mechanisms of bioactive polysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum (Lingzhi), a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Soccol, C.R.; Bissoqui, L.Y.; Rodrigues, C.; Rubel, R.; Sella, S.R.; Leifa, F.; Soccol, V.T. Pharmacological properties of biocompounds from spores of the lingzhi or reishi medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum (Agaricomycetes): A review. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2016, 18, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soylu, E.M.; Soylu, S.; Kurt, S. Antimicrobial Activities of the Essential Oils of Various Plants against Tomato Late Blight Disease Agent Phytophthora infestans. Mycopathologia 2006, 161, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, F.-C.; Ke, Y.-F.; Kuo, S.-S. Effect of fatty acids on the mycelial growth and polysaccharide formation by Ganoderma lucidum in shake flask cultures. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2000, 27, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, Y.-N.; Zhong, J.-J. Impacts of calcium signal transduction on the fermentation production of antitumor ganoderic acids by medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, Y.-J.; Zhu, L.-W. Improvement of Ganoderic Acid and Ganoderma Polysaccharide Biosynthesis by Ganoderma lucidum Fermentation Under the Inducement of Cu2+. Biotechnol. Prog. 2010, 26, 417–423. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schnellbaecher, A.; Binder, D.; Bellmaine, S.; Zimmer, A. Vitamins in cell culture medium: Stability and stabilization strategies. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019, 116, 1537–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zárate-Chaves, C.A.; Romero-Rodríguez, M.C.; Niño-Arias, F.C.; Robles-Camargo, J.; Linares-Linares, M.; Rodríguez-Bocanegra, M.X.; Gutiérrez-Rojas, I. Optimizing a culture medium for biomass and phenolic compounds production using Ganoderma lucidum. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wagner, R.; Mitchell, D.A.; Sassaki, G.; Lopes de Almeida Amazonas, M.A.; Berovi, M. Current Techniques for the Cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum for the Production of Biomass, Ganoderic Acid and Polysaccharides. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2003, 41, 371–382. Available online: https://www.ftb.com.hr/images/pdfarticles/2003/October-December/41-371.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  15. Fang, Q.-H.; Tang, Y.-J.; Zhong, J.-J. Significance of inoculation density control in production of polysaccharide and ganoderic acid by submerged culture of Ganoderma lucidum. Process. Biochem. 2002, 37, 1375–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chang, M.-Y.; Tsai, G.-J.; Houng, J.-Y. Optimization of the medium composition for the submerged culture of Ganoderma lucidum by Taguchi array design and steepest ascent method. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2006, 38, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tang, Y.-J.; Zhong, J.-J. Role of oxygen supply in submerged fermentation of Ganoderma lucidum for production of Ganoderma polysaccharide and ganoderic acid. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2003, 32, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jo, W.-S.; Cho, Y.-J.; Cho, D.-H.; Park, S.-D.; Yoo, Y.-B.; Seok, S.-J. Culture Conditions for the Mycelial Growth ofGanoderma applanatum. Mycobiology 2009, 37, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Feng, J.; Zhang, J.-Z.; Feng, N.; Yan, M.-Q.; Yang, Y.; Jia, W.; Lin, C.-C. A novel Ganoderma lucidum G0119 fermentation strategy for enhanced triterpenes production by statistical process optimization and addition of oleic acid. Eng. Life Sci. 2017, 17, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Spiess, A.-N.; Neumeyer, N. An evaluation of R2 as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: A Monte Carlo approach. BMC Pharmacol. 2010, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kim, H.M.; Kim, S.W.; Hwang, H.J.; Park, M.K.; Mahmoud, Y.A.-G.; Choi, J.W.; Yun, J.W. Influence of Agitation Intensity and Aeration Rate on Production of Antioxidative Exopolysaccharides from Submerged Mycelial Culture of Ganoderma resinaceum. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 16, 1240–1247. [Google Scholar]
  22. Salmon, D.N.; Fendrich, R.C.; Cruz, M.A.; Weingartner-Montibeller, V.; Vandenberghe, L.P.; Soccol, C.R.; Rigon-Spier, M. Bioprocess for phytase production by Ganoderma sp. MR-56 in different types of bioreactors through submerged cultivation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 114, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, Y.-J.; Zhong, J.-J. Fed-batch fermentation of Ganoderma lucidum for hyperproduction of polysaccharide and ganoderic acid. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2002, 31, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lejeune, R.; Baron, G.V. Modeling the exponential growth of filamentous fungi during batch cultivation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 60, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yorulmaz, A.; Erinc, H.; Tekin, A. Changes in Olive and Olive Oil Characteristics During Maturation. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2013, 90, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lv, G.-P.; Zhao, J.; Duan, J.-A.; Tang, Y.-P.; Li, S.-P. Comparison of sterols and fatty acids in two species of Ganoderma. Chem. Cent. J. 2012, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Fei, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, D.-H.; Xu, J.-W. Increased production of ganoderic acids by overexpression of homologous farnesyl diphosphate synthase and kinetic modeling of ganoderic acid production in Ganoderma lucidum. Microb. Cell Factor. 2019, 18, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wei, Z.-H.; Duan, Y.-Y.; Qian, Y.-Q.; Guo, X.-F.; Li, Y.-J.; Jin, S.-H.; Zhou, Z.-X.; Shan, S.-Y.; Wang, C.-R.; Chen, X.-J.; et al. Screening of Ganoderma strains with high polysaccharides and ganoderic acid contents and optimization of the fermentation medium by statistical methods. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 37, 1789–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Torres-López, A.M.; Quintero-Díaz, J.C.; Atehortúa-Garcés, L. Efecto de nutrientes sobre la producción de biomasa del hongo medicinal Ganoderma lucidum. Rev. Colomb. De Biotecnol. 2011, 13, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  30. Papagianni, M. Fungal morphology and metabolite production in submerged mycelial processes. Biotechnol. Adv. 2004, 22, 189–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guevara-Manzanares, V. Producción de Ácidos Ganodéricos y Beta-(1–3)-(1–6)-D-Glucanos en el Cultivo Líquido Sumergido de Ganoderma sp. de Interés Medicinal en la Industria Alimenticia de Costa Rica; Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica: Cartago, Costa Rica, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Dry biomass concentration obtained after 14 days in the optimized medium (C), optimized medium supplemented with 9.1 g/L olive oil (C2), and commercial potato dextrose medium (PDB). Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Figure 1. Dry biomass concentration obtained after 14 days in the optimized medium (C), optimized medium supplemented with 9.1 g/L olive oil (C2), and commercial potato dextrose medium (PDB). Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Microorganisms 10 01404 g001
Figure 2. The effect of the inoculum method on the dry biomass weight of Ganoderma sp. mycelia.
Figure 2. The effect of the inoculum method on the dry biomass weight of Ganoderma sp. mycelia.
Microorganisms 10 01404 g002
Figure 3. Dry biomass concentration and growth index obtained after 14 days using different inoculum concentrations. Black bars: dry biomass concentration (g/L). Striped bars: growth index (g/g). Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Figure 3. Dry biomass concentration and growth index obtained after 14 days using different inoculum concentrations. Black bars: dry biomass concentration (g/L). Striped bars: growth index (g/g). Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Microorganisms 10 01404 g003
Figure 4. Growth kinetics of the Ganoderma sp. in the flask culture. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Figure 4. Growth kinetics of the Ganoderma sp. in the flask culture. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Microorganisms 10 01404 g004
Figure 5. Dry biomass concentration (at 12 days) and kLa (before inoculation) for the two airflow rates tested at the stirred tank bioreactor. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of two independent replicates.
Figure 5. Dry biomass concentration (at 12 days) and kLa (before inoculation) for the two airflow rates tested at the stirred tank bioreactor. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of two independent replicates.
Microorganisms 10 01404 g005
Table 1. Components studied to optimize the culture medium.
Table 1. Components studied to optimize the culture medium.
FactorsConcentration (g/L)Reference
Low (–)High (+)
Olive oil 0.00 *3.00[9]
SaltsCaCl2 2H2O0.001.45[10]
CuSO4 5H2O0.000.25[11]
Thiamine 0.000.05[12]
* not added.
Table 2. Dry biomass concentrations in treatments evaluated for optimization of the culture medium.
Table 2. Dry biomass concentrations in treatments evaluated for optimization of the culture medium.
MediumVariablesDry Biomass Concentration (g/L)Tukey’s Grouping
Olive OilSaltsThiamine
A+++ *19.87 ± 1.73 **a b
B++-19.05 ± 1.70a b c
C+-+23.39 ± 2.44a
D+--14.24 ± 1.24c d
E-++12.23 ± 1.39d
F-+-14.30 ± 0.98c d
G--+16.04 ± 0.94b c d
H---12.56 ± 2.61d
* “+” included and “-” not included; ** Standard deviations for n = 3.
Table 3. Analysis of variance calculated by Minitab 19 for the factorial design.
Table 3. Analysis of variance calculated by Minitab 19 for the factorial design.
SourceDF *Adj SS **Adj MS ***F-Valuep-Value
Model7327.49746.78515.600.000
Linear3220.79473.59824.540.000
Olive Oil1171.949171.94957.330.000
Salts10.2240.2240.070.788
Thiamine148.62148.62116.210.001
2-Way Interactions3103.81834.60611.540.000
Olive Oil * Salts14.2344.2341.410.252
Olive Oil * Thiamine127.47827.4789.160.008
Salts * Thiamine172.10772.10724.040.000
3-Way Interactions12.8842.8840.960.341
Olive Oil * Salts * Thiamine12.8842.8840.960.341
Error1647.9923.000
Total23375.489
* DF: Degrees of freedom. ** Adj SS: Adjusted sum of squares. *** Adj MS: Adjusted mean square.
Table 4. Dry biomass concentration of each pair of treatments analyzed by Tukey’s method of multiple comparisons for the olive oil–thiamine interaction. n = 3.
Table 4. Dry biomass concentration of each pair of treatments analyzed by Tukey’s method of multiple comparisons for the olive oil–thiamine interaction. n = 3.
Treatment PairsLevelMean Dry Biomass
Concentration (g/L)
Group
Olive OilThiamine
A-C++21.63 ± 2.70 *a
B-D+-16.64 ± 2.95 b
E-G-+14.14 ± 2.34 bc
F-H--13.43 ± 2.01 c
* s.d.
Table 5. Dry biomass concentration for each pair of treatments analyzed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for the salt–thiamine interaction, n = 3.
Table 5. Dry biomass concentration for each pair of treatments analyzed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for the salt–thiamine interaction, n = 3.
Means of TreatmentsConcentrationMean Dry Biomass
Concentration (g/L)
Group
SaltsThiamine
C-G-+19.71 ± 4.35 *a
B-F+-16.67 ± 2.88 b
A-E++16.05 ± 4.41 bc
D-H--13.40 ± 2.05 c
* s.d.
Table 6. Specific growth rate of Ganoderma sp. in the submerged culture obtained from different growth models.
Table 6. Specific growth rate of Ganoderma sp. in the submerged culture obtained from different growth models.
ModelSpecific Growth Rate (h−1)Standard Error of the Regression (g/L)AICc
Exponential0.0041 ± 0.0005 *2.4242.54
Logistic0.0139 ± 0.00261.7628.54
Gompertz0.0087 ± 0.00191.6725.93
Richards0.0087 ± 0.01081.7128.56
* Standard error for the parameter estimation.
Table 7. Reported dry biomass concentrations and culture conditions for Ganoderma sp. growth in stirred tank bioreactors.
Table 7. Reported dry biomass concentrations and culture conditions for Ganoderma sp. growth in stirred tank bioreactors.
Culture Medium (g/L) Operating Conditions Bioreactor Configuration Operation ModeDry Biomass Concentration (g/L) Ref.
Glc 30, Pep 5, YE 5, KH2PO4 0.5, K2HPO4 0.5, MgSO4 7H2O 0.5, B1 0.05, OO 9.130 °C, pH 5.5, 0.5 g/L, 12 d2 L, 350 rpm, 0.25 vvm, MA-PI6-RT, PSBatch22.6 (12 d)This work
Glc 16, Pep 2.93, CF 20.93, SBP 6.44, KH2PO4 1.5, MgSO4 7H2O 130 °C, 2.0 g/L, 6 d35 L, 125 rpm, 0.6 vvmBatch21.5 (5 d)[18]
Glc 55, YE 14.3, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.26, Fe2(SO4)3 0.34, B1 0.0530 °C, pH 5.5, 0.5 g/L, 12 d7 L, 300 rpm, 1.0 vvm, RT-RT, RSBatch25.7 (12 d)[19]
WB 200, YE 8030 °C, pH 6.0, 14.7 g/L, 8 d4 L, 200 rpm, 1.0 vvm, RTBatch28.2 (8 d) [20]
Lac 35, Pep 5, YE 5, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.5, B1 0.0530 °C, pH 5.5, pO2 20–35%, 0.6 g/L, 22 d2 L, 100–180 rpm, 0.25–0.5 vvm, RT-RT, RSFed batch21.9 (12 d)[21]
Glc 35, Pep 5, YE 5, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.530 °C, pH 4.0, pO2 20%, 0.5 g/L, 10 d10 L, 300 rpm, 2.0 vvm (max)Fed batch26.6 (10 d)[22]
Lac 35, Pep 5, YE 5, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.5, B1 0.0530 °C, pH 3.0–4.5, pO2 25–10%, 0.6 g/L, 18 d5.5 L, 50–400 rpm, 0.1–0.7 vvm, RT-RT-PI4, RSFed batch22.6 (12 d)[23]
Glc 25, Suc 20, YE 14, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.26, B1 0.0530 °C, pH 5.5, 0.5 g/L, 10 d7 L, 300 rpm, 1.0 vvmFed batch29.7 (9 d)[24]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rosales-López, C.; Vargas-López, A.; Monge-Artavia, M.; Rojas-Chaves, M. Evaluation of Conditions to Improve Biomass Production by Submerged Culture of Ganoderma sp. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071404

AMA Style

Rosales-López C, Vargas-López A, Monge-Artavia M, Rojas-Chaves M. Evaluation of Conditions to Improve Biomass Production by Submerged Culture of Ganoderma sp. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(7):1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071404

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rosales-López, Catalina, Alejandro Vargas-López, Mariana Monge-Artavia, and Miguel Rojas-Chaves. 2022. "Evaluation of Conditions to Improve Biomass Production by Submerged Culture of Ganoderma sp." Microorganisms 10, no. 7: 1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071404

APA Style

Rosales-López, C., Vargas-López, A., Monge-Artavia, M., & Rojas-Chaves, M. (2022). Evaluation of Conditions to Improve Biomass Production by Submerged Culture of Ganoderma sp. Microorganisms, 10(7), 1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071404

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop