Next Article in Journal
Metabolites and Their Bioactivities from the Genus Cordyceps
Next Article in Special Issue
Algae as Feedstuff for Ruminants: A Focus on Single-Cell Species, Opportunistic Use of Algal By-Products and On-Site Production
Previous Article in Journal
The Prevalence, Coexistence, and Correlations between Seven Pathogens Detected by a PCR Method from South-Western Poland Dairy Cattle Suffering from Bovine Respiratory Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in Phytoplankton Community Composition and Phytoplankton Cell Size in Response to Nitrogen Availability Depend on Temperature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Microalgae: A Promising Future

by
Carmela Caroppo
1,* and
Patrizia Pagliara
2,*
1
Water Research Institute, National Research Council (IRSA-CNR), 74123 Taranto, Italy
2
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1488; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081488
Submission received: 20 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 24 July 2022
Microalgae are photosynthetic unicellular microorganisms that represent an extremely important component of the aquatic ecosystem productivity, diversity, and functioning [1]. Particularly, phytoplankton, adapted to live in suspension in water masses, provide about half (49%) of the global net primary production in marine and freshwater systems [2]. Moreover, microalgae exhibit a high diversity and include species highly distant from an evolutionary point of view [3]. Despite their small size, which ranges between 0.2 and 200 μm, they can contribute to climate change mitigation through carbon fixation [4,5]. Indeed, biological capture and sequestration of carbon using microalgae have been recognized as one of the world’s most important and effective carbon sequestration methods [6,7]. The promising technique can allow CO2 capture and recycle into biomass, which in turn could be useful to produce bioenergy and other value-added products. However, because this becomes efficient, it is important to continue investing widely in the research and development of technology and in the knowledge of the microalgal world.
In our day, climate change represents a serious problem, also because these changes hardly affect trophic structure and dynamics of aquatic ecosystems as well as phenology, and physiological and life-history traits of organisms.
In the Special Issue “A Glimpse into Future Research on Microalgae Diversity, Ecology and Biotechnology”, studies aimed to improve knowledge on the effects of climate changes on phytoplankton communities’ composition and dynamics in freshwater [8] and brackish [9] ecosystems. Dashkova and co-authors [8], using a eutrophic shallow lake mesocosm as a model, demonstrated how the dynamics of structural and morphological changes of phytoplankton responded to N availability under different temperature conditions. These results could contribute to forecast climate change effects on the world’s shallow lake ecosystems. Moreover, the use of recent complementary technology to traditional microscopy such as imaging flow cytometry (IFC) has proved useful for the morphological and structural analysis of phytoplankton and as a useful tool for routine monitoring programs of aquatic ecosystems.
On the other hand, Okhapkin and co-authors [9] carried out their research in an atypical brackish system (the small gypsum karstic Lake Klyuchik, Middle Volga basin), characterized by high values of water mineralization and low temperatures. This unique and complex ecosystem, for its peculiarity, represents an interesting model system for the investigation of phytoplankton diversity, largely unexplored in this kind of environment. The value of this research derives not only from the increase in knowledge of phytoplankton diversity in specific conditions, but also from providing helpful tools to decision makers for the management and protection of environments of high naturalistic value.
Another ecological paper reported in this Special Issue focused on the bioremediation of the microalgal species that are considered “harmful” for their ability to produce toxins that negatively impact human health, and to induce blooms with detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems, fisheries, aquaculture, and tourism [10]. As control actions are urgently needed to suppress harmful algal blooms, Stabili and co-authors [11] demonstrated the high filter-feeding capacity of two sabellid polychaetes, Branchiomma luctuosum and Sabella spallanzanii, on a harmful microalga (the dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae). Even if preliminary, these results could represent a sustainable and environmentally friendly method for the restoration of the aquatic ecosystems and a very advantageous tool for the management of the aquaculture plans.
In the field of bioeconomy, the use of innovative processes is extremely important to produce biomaterials and bioenergy, reducing, in the meantime, the consumption of virgin resources. Microalgae-based wastewater treatment represents a valid contribution to this practice. This activity has recently received attention due to its low energy demand, the robust capacity of microalgae to grow under different environmental conditions, and the possibility to recover and transform wastewater nutrients into highly valuable bioactive compounds [12].
Outdoor open systems (i.e., raceway ponds, bubble columns, flat panels) are considered so far as the most viable method of microalgal cultivation on wastewaters [13], even if complex and dynamic microbial consortia are formed inside [14,15]. A contribution to this field derives from a study, included in this Special Issue, which examined and compared the nutrient removal efficiency, biomass productivity, and microbial community structure of two outdoor pilot-scale photobioreactors (bubble column and raceway pond) [13]. Data obtained, including the characterization of bacterial and eukaryotic communities using a metabarcoding approach and quantitative PCR, highlighted a different behavior and a different composition of the microbial communities, which were subjected to variations of the environmental conditions as well as of the reactors’ operational parameters. Knowing the factors that influence the structure and dynamics of the microbial consortia allowed establishing which parameters influenced the performance of the reactors. These data encourage the use of microalgal polycultures for a more stable production of biomass in outdoor cultivation systems.
In recent years, an increased interest aimed at expanding knowledge on microalgae has been recorded as they represent a world still partially unknown, but which has many intriguing application aspects being considered as next-generation resources with the potential to address urgent industrial and agricultural demands. In this framework, we must consider that microalgae use a network of signals to interact with all the other organisms living in their environment. The signals are often secondary metabolites generally not necessary for their daily functioning, but they play an important role in competition, defense, attraction, and signaling. These molecules that include pigments, sterols, and polyunsaturated fatty acids can have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects [16]. However, even if they are recognized for having bioactive properties, they are still largely underexplored and underexploited.
Among microalgae, cyanobacteria are one of the most investigated microorganisms for biotechnological purposes, as three reports of the Special Issue demonstrate [17,18,19].
Arthrospira platensis, known as Spirulina, is a cyanobacterium with multiple nutritional and therapeutic properties [20]. These algae are in fact rich in proteins (60%–70% by weight), vitamins (4% by weight), essential amino acids, minerals (zinc, selenium, magnesium), essential fatty acids (Linoleni-Co acid), carotenoids, chlorophylls, and phytosterols. For this reason, their production is primarily destined for dietary supplement markets, and they are commercialized in many countries. Arthrospira is also a rich and inexpensive source of the pigment like phycocyanin [21,22]. Phycocyanin is a blue-red fluorescent, water-soluble, and non-toxic biliprotein pigment with recognized therapeutic properties, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immune-modulatory, and anti-cancer activities. A combination of different techniques is generally used to achieve the purification of phycocyanin from crude algae extracts. Therefore, an increasingly addressed research towards product improvement has been observed in recent years. As an example, Nisticò and co-authors [17] developed a protocol to obtain a very high phycocyanin yield from A. maxima biomass. It represents a sustainable process for the recovery, fractionation, and purification of phycocyanin from a strain of A. maxima cultivated in a farm devoted to producing this molecule with food-grade purity. In addition, the authors adopted a combination of ultrafiltration and diafiltration that allowed the removal of about 91.7% of the DNA from the crude extract. This is of particular interest as it leads to an increase in purity degree in the retentate fraction, thus allowing the production of extracts suitable for other uses including therapeutic and biomedical applications.
Being that Arthrospira is a species largely cultivated for animal and human food additives and as a source of phycocyanin, a bioactive antioxidant molecule, it is important to know the effects of herbicides on this species. In this context, Piro and co-authors [18] investigated the effects of glyphosate, a broad-spectrum herbicide at the center of a large debate on potential toxicity. On the subject, there are different positions with different results, and this once again also happens regarding the effects on Spirulina. Indeed, the authors [18] evidenced that a deliberate treatment with glyphosate on the selected cultivation of this cyanobacterium negatively affected the biomass and the photosynthetic pigments, and it induced resistance in A. maxima survival. These results demonstrated that the resistance of A. maxima to glyphosate effects is mediated by a key enzyme until now not identified in other Spirulina species.
Investigations on bioactive compounds are a very promising area in full development. The growing interest is due to the wide range of applications including the food industry, agrochemicals, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products. Although new bioactive molecules from the microbial world continue to be discovered, this however remains a field that is still little explored. With the investigations on two cyanobacterial strains, Pagliara and co-authors [19] intended to contribute to increasing the amount of information on the properties of these microorganisms, expanding the cyanobacteria range from which new compounds with significant bioactivity could be identified. The two strains, belonging to Cyanobium and Synechococcus genera, have been previously identified after their isolation from a Mediterranean marine sponge [23,24]. Intriguing is the presence in these cyanobacteria of important compound as BMAA, 2,4-DAB and microcystin, here evidenced for the first time in cyanobacteria isolated from a marine sponge. Moreover, the strong cytotoxic activity observed for aqueous and methanolic extracts of these two cyanobacteria laid the foundation to produce bioactive compounds of pharmacological interest.
The editors hope that the data reported in this Special Issue could represent a useful reference for researchers and managers interested in microalgae and their biotechnological applications.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Naselli-Flores, L.; Padisák, J. Ecosystem services provided by marine and freshwater phytoplankton. Hydrobiologia 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Friend, A.D.; Geider, R.J.; Behrenfeld, M.J.; Sill, C.J. Photosynthesis in Global Scale Models. In Photosynthesis in Silico: Understanding Complexity from Molecules to Ecosystems; Laisk, A., Nedbal, L., Govindjee, G., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, Germany, 2009; pp. 465–497. [Google Scholar]
  3. De Vargas, C.; Audic, S.; Henry, N.; Decelle, J.; Mahé, F.; Logares, R.; Lara, E.; Berney, C.; Le Bescot, N.; Probert, I.; et al. Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science 2015, 348, 1261605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ratnapuram, H.P.; Vutukuru, S.; Yadavalli, R. Mixotrophic transition induced lipid productivity in Chlorella pyrenoidosa under stress conditions for biodiesel production. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Vu, C.H.T.; Lee, H.-G.; Chang, Y.K.; Oh, H.-M. Axenic cultures for microalgal biotechnology: Establishment, assessment, maintenance, and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 380–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moreira, D.; Pires, J.C. Atmospheric CO2 capture by algae: Negative carbon dioxide emission path. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Alami, A.H.; Alasad, S.; Ali, M.; Alshamsi, M. Investigating algae for CO2 capture and accumulation and simultaneous production of biomass for biodiesel production. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 759, 143529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dashkova, V.; Malashenkov, D.V.; Baishulakova, A.; Davidson, T.A.; Vorobjev, I.A.; Jeppesen, E.; Barteneva, N.S. Changes in Phytoplankton Community Composition and Phytoplankton Cell Size in Response to Nitrogen Availability Depend on Temperature. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Okhapkin, A.; Sharagina, E.; Kulizin, P.; Startseva, N.; Vodeneeva, E. Phytoplankton Community Structure in Highly-Mineralized Small Gypsum Karst Lake (Russia). Microorganisms 2022, 10, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karlson, B.; Andersen, P.; Arneborg, L.; Cembella, A.; Eikrem, W.; John, U.; West, J.J.; Klemm, K.; Kobos, J.; Lehtinen, S.; et al. Harmful algal blooms and their effects in coastal seas of Northern Europe. Harmful Algae 2021, 102, 101989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stabili, L.; Licciano, M.; Giangrande, A.; Caroppo, C. Filtration of the Microalga Amphidinium carterae by the Polychaetes Sabella spallanzanii and Branchiomma luctuosum: A New Tool for the Control of Harmful Algal Blooms? Microorganisms 2022, 10, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. López-Sánchez, A.; Silva-Gálvez, A.L.; Aguilar-Juárez, Ó.; Senés-Guerrero, C.; Orozco-Nunnelly, D.A.; Carrillo-Nieves, D.; Gradilla-Hernández, M.S. Microalgae-based livestock wastewater treatment (MbWT) as a circular bioeconomy approach: Enhancement of biomass productivity, pollutant removal and high-value compound production. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 308, 114612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bani, A.; Parati, K.; Pozzi, A.; Previtali, C.; Bongioni, G.; Pizzera, A.; Ficara, E.; Bellucci, M. Comparison of the Performance and Microbial Community Structure of Two Outdoor Pilot-Scale Photobioreactors Treating Digestate. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ofiţeru, I.D.; Lunn, M.; Curtis, T.P.; Wells, G.F.; Criddle, C.S.; Francis, C.A.; Sloan, W.T. Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 15345–15350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Van Der Gast, C.J.; Ager, D.; Lilley, A.K. Temporal scaling of bacterial taxa is influenced by both stochastic and deterministic ecological factors. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lauritano, C.; Saide, A. Editorial of Special Issue “Microalgal Molecules and Enzymes”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nisticò, D.M.; Piro, A.; Oliva, D.; Osso, V.; Mazzuca, S.; Fagà, F.A.; Morelli, R.; Conidi, C.; Figoli, A.; Cassano, A. A Combination of Aqueous Extraction and Ultrafiltration for the Purification of Phycocyanin from Arthrospira maxima. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Piro, A.; Nisticò, D.M.; Oliva, D.; Fagà, F.A.; Mazzuca, S. Physiological and Metabolic Response of Arthrospira maxima to Organophosphates. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pagliara, P.; De Benedetto, G.E.; Francavilla, M.; Barca, A.; Caroppo, C. Bioactive Potential of Two Marine Picocyanobacteria Belonging to Cyanobium and Synechococcus Genera. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, Q.; Liu, L.; Miron, A.; Klímová, B.; Wan, D.; Kuča, K. The antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory activities of Spirulina: An overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 1817–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kato, T. Blue pigment from Spirulina. New Food Indust. 1994, 29, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  22. McCarty, M.F. Clinical potential of Spirulina as a source of phycocyanobilin. J. Med. Food 2007, 10, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pagliara, P.; Caroppo, C. Cytotoxic and antimitotic activities in aqueous extracts of eight cyanobacterial strains isolated from the marine sponge Petrosia ficiformis. Toxicon 2011, 57, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pagliara, P.; Barca, A.; Verri, T.; Caroppo, C. The Marine Sponge Petrosia ficiformis Harbors Different Cyanobacteria Strains with Potential Biotechnological Application. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caroppo, C.; Pagliara, P. Microalgae: A Promising Future. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081488

AMA Style

Caroppo C, Pagliara P. Microalgae: A Promising Future. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(8):1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caroppo, Carmela, and Patrizia Pagliara. 2022. "Microalgae: A Promising Future" Microorganisms 10, no. 8: 1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop