Next Article in Journal
Terpenes Combinations Inhibit Biofilm Formation in Staphyloccocus aureus by Interfering with Initial Adhesion
Next Article in Special Issue
Brucella Phagocytosis Mediated by Pathogen-Host Interactions and Their Intracellular Survival
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Training on Calf Producers’ Knowledge, Treatment Behaviors and Quantified Antimicrobial Use
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alternate Special Stains for the Detection of Mycotic Organisms in Oral Cyto-Smears—A Histomorphometric Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Regulation of Immune Homeostasis via Muramyl Peptides-Low Molecular Weight Bioregulators of Bacterial Origin

by
Svetlana V. Guryanova
Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, 117198 Moscow, Russia
Microorganisms 2022, 10(8), 1526; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081526
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 20 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 28 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host–Microbe Interactions in Animal/Human Health and Disease 2021)

Abstract

:
Metabolites and fragments of bacterial cells play an important role in the formation of immune homeostasis. Formed in the course of evolution, symbiotic relationships between microorganisms and a macroorganism are manifested, in particular, in the regulation of numerous physiological functions of the human body by the innate immunity receptors. Low molecular weight bioregulators of bacterial origin have recently attracted more and more attention as drugs in the prevention and composition of complex therapy for a wide range of diseases of bacterial and viral etiology. Signaling networks show cascades of causal relationships of deterministic phenomena that support the homeostasis of multicellular organisms at different levels. To create networks, data from numerous biomedical and clinical research databases were used to prepare expert systems for use in pharmacological and biomedical research with an emphasis on muramyl dipeptides. Muramyl peptides are the fragments of the cell wall of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Binding of muramyl peptides with intracellular NOD2 receptors is crucial for an immune response on pathogens. Depending on the microenvironment and duration of action, muramyl peptides possess positive or negative regulation of inflammation. Other factors, such as genetic, pollutions, method of application and stress also contribute and should be taken into account. A system biology approach should be used in order to systemize all experimental data for rigorous analysis, with the aim of understanding intrinsic pathways of homeostasis, in order to define precise medicine therapy and drug design.

1. Introduction

Microorganisms that inhabit human skin and mucous membranes take an active part in the formation of the human immune system from the moment of birth. Evolutionarily formed relationships between microorganisms and a macroorganism provide the possibility of sustainable development of the human body in the modern world, which has more than a million lines of bacteria [1]. At the same time, microorganisms that do not have a harmful effect on the human body are commensal. Commensal organisms that inhabit the skin and mucous membranes prevent the colonization of harmful bacteria, they produce substances and vitamins that are vital for humans, and when degraded, they are a source of molecules that keep the human immune system active, providing an adequate response to pathogens not only of a bacterial nature, but also on viruses, fungi and protozoa [2]. In view of the emergence of new microorganisms that cause epidemics in the modern world, increasing nonspecific resistance becomes an urgent task. It is of interest to study low molecular weight compounds of bacterial origin due to their ability to pass through the epidermis and mucous membranes, and thus have a local and systemic effect on the macroorganism, helping to combat pathogens. Low molecular weight bioregulators of bacterial origin include short chain fatty acids, bile acids, fragments of cell walls—lipopolysaccharide and muramyl peptides [2]. Muramyl peptides (MPs) are part of the peptidoglycan that forms the backbone of the cell walls of bacteria—both Gram-positive and Gram-negative. MPs are formed during the degradation of bacteria and are pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are recognized by innate immune receptors. For decades, MPs have attracted the attention of researchers as promising drugs and vaccine components for combating infectious and oncological diseases due to their ability to affect innate and acquired immunity [3,4,5]. This review is devoted to the analysis of the effect of muramyl peptides on the regulation of immune homeostasis (1) at the level of microorganisms inhabiting the skin and mucous membranes; (2) at the level of cell populations and (3) at the level of intracellular processes. In particular, we highlight progress made toward understanding the positive and negative regulation of inflammation by muramyl peptides.

2. Sources of Muramyl Peptides in the Human’s Body

Muramyl peptides are monomers of peptidoglycan, which forms the cell wall of almost all known bacteria, with the exception of Rickettsia, and protect bacteria from osmotic lysis. Gram-positive bacteria have a thicker peptidoglycan layer than Gram-negative bacteria. N-acetylmuramic acid, which is part of muramyl peptides, is a highly conserved structure, synthesized exclusively in prokaryotic organisms, and which, together with N-acetylglucosamine, forms the backbone of bacterial walls. Monosaccharide-containing muramyl peptides (N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine, MDP) and disaccharide-containing glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptides (N-acetylglucosaminyl-N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine GMDP) (Figure 1) can have modifications as a sugar residue and the peptide part of the molecule, which differ in different bacteria.
The presence or absence of muramyl peptides (MPs) in the organism of a healthy person was a long time of discussion. Methods of mass chromatography (MC), gas liquid chromatography (GLC), and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to determine MPs in human tissues and fluids in order to identify the relationship with chronic infectious foci [6,7,8].
At present, using monoclonal antibodies, it has been found that muramyl peptides are normally present in the blood serum of healthy people at a concentration of 0.330–0.838 μg/mL, where they enter through the intestinal mucosa during the breakdown of microflora [9]. The main role in the degradation of polymeric peptidoglycan is played by host enzymes that cleave bacterial peptidoglycans, for example, lysozyme, amidases, peptidoglycan-recognizing proteins, and many others [10,11]. However, in addition this, bacterial enzymes are also known that use hydrolases, peptidases, amidases, glycosidases, and lysozyme-like proteins for the partial destructuring of cell wall peptidoglycan during bacterial division and growth, pili formation, autolysis, and transmembrane transport [12,13,14]. Enzymes that destroy peptidoglycan are also secreted by bacteria in the competition between bacteria of different lines for the development of new habitat niches and are strictly species-specific [15,16,17]. Bacteriophages also use murein hydrolases and lysozyme-like proteins to penetrate bacteria, destroying their peptidoglycan [18,19,20]. Lysozyme-like proteins that degrade peptidoglycan to disaccharide-containing derivatives have also been found in fungi [21]. Thus, the enzymes of bacteria, bacteriophages, and fungi that are part of the commensal microflora, along with human enzymes, contribute to the formation of muramyl peptides. Recent studies have shown that it is muramyl peptides, due to the production of the cytokine GM-CSF activate tolerogenic CD103+ dendritic cells and provide tolerance to the commensal microflora, maintaining immune homeostasis [22].
In animals, the excretion and degradation of muramyl peptides can occur much faster than in humans. In particular, a study of the content of natural muramyl peptides in the blood serum of rabbits showed that normally muramyl peptides are not detected at a method sensitivity of 500 pmol/mL [23]. Moreover, immediately after the injection of synthetic muramyl dipeptide, it was easily detected in the bloodstream, but this level rapidly decreased [23]. Similarly, in rat tissues with a sensitivity of 1 ng, muramyl peptides were not normally detected, but were determined in the spleen and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with pneumococcal meningitis (from 6.8 to 3900 ng of muramic acid/mL of cerebrospinal fluid) [24]. In mice, after the intravenous and subcutaneous injection of radioactively labeled MDP, more than 50% of 14C-MDP was excreted in the urine after 30 min and more than 90% 2 h after administration; the labeled compound was detected in the urine unchanged [25].
When studying the content of muramyl peptides in the blood serum of laboratory mice using HPLC and MS, the content of various derivatives of muramyl peptides was found [26]. In addition, muramyl peptides GlcNAc-MurNAc-l-Ala-d-Gln-meso DAP (GM-TriDAP), GlcNAc-MurNAc-l-Ala-d-Gln (GMDP) and l-Ala-d-Gln-meso DAP (TriDAP) were found, which suggests that traces of circulating peptidoglycan may be present in serum, and the effect of muramyl peptides in experimental in vitro studies may be underestimated [26].
The species specificity of the ability to cleave muramyl peptides, as well as the presence of muramyl peptides in the serum used for cell culture, must be taken into account when organizing preclinical studies of drugs based on muramyl peptides, as well as when interpreting experimental data from laboratory studies.

3. Effect of Muramyl Peptides on Microorganisms

Muramyl peptides, being monomers of peptidoglycan, have a direct effect on microorganisms and their development cycles. Remodeling of peptidoglycan is necessary for bacteria to reproduce; with each division of bacteria, about 40–50% of peptidoglycan breaks down into monomeric units, and can be used to build the cell walls of the next generation of bacteria [27]. When murein hydrolases act on the bacterial cell wall, the muramyl peptides formed in the periplasm are recycled and reused by bacteria to form peptidoglycan [28]. Dozens of murein hydrolases have been described that are characteristic of certain lines of bacteria and bacteriophages, resulting in the formation of a large number of monosaccharide-containing and disaccharide-containing muramyl peptide derivatives that are recycled during bacterial growth [20,29]. Numerous experiments have shown the spontaneous release of peptidoglycan fragments from E. coli [30], Bordetella pertussis [31,32], Neisseria gonorrhoeae [29,32], Neisseria meningitides [33], Bordetella pertussis [34], and Shigella [35].
The direct effect of muramyl peptides and their analogues on five bacterial strains of four species (S. aureus MRSA/MSSA, K. pneumoniae ESBL, P. aeruginosa and E. coli) revealed that the value of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was >512 μg/mL against all strains except for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), for which the MIC was 128 μg/mL. As a comparison, the MICs of antibiotics (kanamycin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol) in this experiment ranged from 1 to 32 μg/mL [36]. Muramyl peptides can be used by bacteria for communication [37], participating in the coordination of the growth of the entire population and acting, along with other low molecular weight bioregulators of bacterial origin, as a quorum-sensing mediator.
The direct effect of muramyl peptides is also manifested on dormant forms of bacteria: muramyl peptide 1,6-anhydro-GMDP, added to the medium with dormant Mycobacterium smegmatis bacteria, revived dormant mycobacterial cells in the concentration range of 9–100 ng/mL [38]. The effect of muramyl peptides on the composition of the microbiocenosis of the oral cavity of healthy patients and patients after caries therapy was shown [39,40]. Oral administration of 1 mg GMDP per day for 10 days resulted in a decrease in oral fluid of Candida albicans, Clostridium difficile, and Porphyromonas gingivalis [39,40].
In experiments on J774 cell lines, GMDP inhibited the intracellular growth of M. smegmatis, M. bovis, and M. tuberculosis at concentrations of 40 μg/mL [41].
The antibacterial activity of a few dozens of muramyl peptide derivatives has been studied in experimental animal models. N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine and some analogues have been found to protect mice against Klebsiella pneumoniae even when administered orally, and they also proved to be effective when administered after challenge [42,43]. Interesting data have been obtained from intermittent injections of GMDP into mice infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It was found that injections of GMDP reduced the number of viable bacilli in the lungs, but increased their number in the spleen after 16 weeks, and also reduced the recurrence of infection in the lungs after chemotherapy [44].
The use of the disaccharide-containing muramyl peptide GMDP 1–4 days before the administration of a lethal dose of E. coli LPS endotoxin protects from 60 to 100% of mice from death [45], while the synthetic derivative of MDP protects against Staphylococcus aureus [46]. The muramyl dipeptide analogue provided protection against intraperitoneal Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection or intravenous Candida albicans infection in mice when administered intraperitoneally, intravenously, or subcutaneously at 80 mg/kg once a day for 4 consecutive days prior to infection. The compounds were not active when administered orally. N-acetyl-nor-muramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine potentiated the action of gentamicin and had a protective effect against Listeria monocytogenes. Post-infection protection was not observed [47]. Muramyl peptide MDP-Lys (L18) had a protective effect in C57BL/6 mice against live cultures of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella enterica Subspecies enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Hokkaido [48].
Muramyl peptides were able to protect animals with immunodeficiencies from infection [49]. MDP protected CBA/N mice carrying the X-linked immune deficiency mutation (xid) against the lethal bacterial infection Streptococcus pneumoniae, Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella enteritidis [50]. Interestingly, in another study in a model of Salmonella enteritidis in CBA/N-defective mice with X-linked immunodeficiency, a single injection of either MDP or MDP-Lys(L18) did not elicit any effective protection, but repeated injections prior to bacterial challenge of MDP-Lys(L18) (100 µg per mouse per day for 3 consecutive days) protected immunodeficient mice. Multiple injections of MDP once a day for several days in a row significantly increased bactericidal activity in the abdominal cavity and spleen of mice [51]. Muramyl peptides in experimental studies on animals not only demonstrated activity against various bacterial infections, but they also had a protective effect against viruses, fungi, and protozoa [52,53,54].

4. Muramyl Peptides Activation of Various Cell Populations

To date, several drugs based on muramyl peptides have been registered, and clinical trials of vaccines containing muramyl peptides are underway [4]. These clinical trials were preceded by numerous studies on the effect of muramyl peptides on various cell populations, which established their ability to activate anti-infective and anti-tumor defenses. With the discovery in 2003 by two independent groups of scientists of the sensors of muramyl peptides—NOD1 and NOD2 proteins and their predominant localization in monocytic cells, the preferential effect of muramyl peptides on the cells of the immune system became clear [55,56]. NOD1 and NOD2 are intracellular receptors of innate immunity; they provide an adequate response to a pathogen in case of its invasion and tolerance to commensal microflora. NOD1 recognizes muramyl peptides containing γ-d-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelic acid (iE-DAP), a peptdoglycan fragment of Gram-negative bacteria [57]. NOD2 recognizes muramyl peptides containing L-Ala-D-isoGln and its derivatives [55,56]. Mutations in NOD1 and NOD2 are associated with inflammatory [58,59,60], oncological [61], and neurodegenerative diseases [62,63]. NOD1 and NOD2 receptors in monocytes initiate an adequate response and clearance from the pathogen. Derivatives of monocytes are macrophages, dendritic cells, osteoclasts, microglia.
Muramyl peptides exhibit pronounced activity against mouse and human macrophages in vitro: their phagocytic and microbicidal ability increases due to an increase in the synthesis of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, superoxide radicals, collagenase, prostaglandins and an increase in the specific activity of beta-glucosaminidase, which is a component of the macrophage lysosome, and lactate dehydrogenase (Figure 2) [42,64]. Recorded changes were observed in peritoneal macrophages, in macrophages isolated from the bone marrow of animals, and also in macrophages isolated from the milk of healthy women [64].
Under the action of muramyl peptides, macrophages synthesize cytokines IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-23, IFN α,β [65,66,67], and regulate the expression of membrane markers, including HLA-DR and adhesion molecules CD18, CD54, CD86 [67,68,69]. CD18-integrin is involved in the implementation of intercellular communication; CD54-Inter-Cellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1,) is required for tissue penetration; and CD86 is a membrane protein of the immunoglobulin family that acts as a co-stimulatory signal in antigen-dependent activation of T-lymphocytes. Thus, muramyl peptides stimulate macrophages to eliminate the pathogen, and to synthesize cytokines and mediators of innate immunity, as well as membrane-associated activation markers, providing the possibility of migration to the site of inflammation and interaction of immune system cells necessary for the implementation of adaptive immunity. Simultaneous stimulation of macrophages with MDP and TLR4 and TLR9 receptor agonists contributed to a significant increase in the synthesis of TNF, IL-1, IL-6, and IFN-α and IFN-β [45,70,71,72,73]. The synergy of the action of muramyl peptides with LPS and IFN on macrophages was the basis for the introduction of MPs as components of antibacterial and antiviral vaccines [74,75]. Interesting results were obtained when MPs were injected into the crushed sciatic nerve of rats [76]. It turned out that the intrafascicular injection of MDP activates macrophages that enter the damaged nerve and support the lengthening of the regenerating axon. The introduction of MDP accelerated the process of axon length increase by 15.5% after 5 days and by 18.3% after 3 weeks [76].
The role of muramyl peptides in the differentiation of dendritic cells (DCs) was determined. Muramyl dipeptide MDP-Lys (L18) increased the expression of CD80, CD83, CD86, and CD40, but not HLA-DR, and stimulated the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-12 (p40) human DCs. In addition, DCs treated with MDP-Lys showed an increased antigen-presenting function compared to untreated DCs [77]. Similar results were also obtained with GMDP [69]. Dendritic cells isolated from the blood of healthy donors who used the drug based on GMDP for 10 days changed their phenotype: the expression of differentiation markers CD80, CD83, and CCR7, which is responsible for DC recruitment to secondary lymphoid organs, increased. Constitutively expressed CCR7 provides autotolerance, as well as tolerance to food and inhalation antigens [78,79]. The expression levels of the XCR1, CD11b, and CD103 genes also increased. The XCR1 receptor plays a leading role in maintaining the homeostasis of mucosal immunity and the formation of memory CD8+T cells [80,81]. In addition, the expression of XCR1 on DC is required for the maturation of regulatory T cells, for the relief of inflammation, the maintenance of autotolerance, and for a cytotoxic immune response [82,83]. The discovered ability of GMDP to increase the expression of XCR1 and CD103 demonstrates the ability of GMDP to control excessive inflammation in mucosal tissues.
MDP induced osteoclast formation, showing synergy with LPS, and did not affect osteoclastogenesis in mice treated with the parathyroid hormone [84,85]. Macrophages of bone tissue osteoclasts resorb bone tissue and, together with osteoblasts, regulate bone remodeling.
Macrophages of the central nervous system (microglia) maintain homeostasis and brain plasticity. In an experimental model, activation of the NOD1 receptor by muramyl peptides enhanced the inflammatory response caused by microglia and exacerbated brain damage after intracerebral hemorrhage in mice [86].
An increase in antibody titer under the influence of MP, confirmed in numerous experimental and clinical studies, can serve as evidence of their activating effect on B-lymphocytes.
The first studies of muramyl peptides on lymphocytes were carried out using laboratory animals [3,87,88]. MDP at a concentration of 0.1 to 1 mg/kg provoked lymphocytosis, and at 10 mg/kg lymphocytopenia and an increase in the number of young stab neutrophils and monocytes. MPs by themselves did not induce antibody synthesis [89,90], but exhibited the properties of adjuvants when administered together with an antigen [75,88,91]. The adjuvant has no antigenic determinants and no antibodies are produced against it, but it can enhance the stimulatory response to compounds that have little effect on their own [92]. MPs exhibit adjuvant properties and potentiate the action of drugs and vaccines [4,93].
The ability of MPs to increase the titers of immunoglobulins was the basis for studying the mechanism of their action and introducing them as components of vaccines [3,87,89,94], since effective animal vaccines alum and Freund’s adjuvant have not been used in humans. MDP was the minimal structure of peptidoglycan included in Freund’s complete adjuvant. The study of numerous MDP derivatives showed that muramic acid and the presence of L-Ala and D-iGln are critical for the manifestation of biological activity [95]. Later, it was shown that the disaccharide-containing MP, GMDP, which is formed, in particular, under the action of lysozyme, increases the titer of antibodies to bovalbumin M much more efficiently than MDP [87]. The developed method for the synthesis of GMDP using a disaccharide obtained from bacteria and a compound with dipeptide turned out to be less expensive than previously proposed, which served as the basis for the development of a drug based on it. It should be noted that the adjuvant activity of MDP was largely expressed against ovalbumin and, to a much lesser extent, against sheep erythrocytes [96]. It is very important that muramyl peptides increase the immune response to low doses of antigen when other adjuvants (FCA, FIA) are not effective [97]. At the same time, MDP stimulated the production of immunoglobulins of the IgG1 subclass. MPs can also increase IgG2a titers [98].
The influence of MPs on the levels of IgA in the oral cavity of humans and animals [39,40,99], in the blood serum of humans [100] and animals [99,101], and in extracts of animal feces [101] was registered. It is interesting that 2-fold intranasal administration of MDP mice as an adjuvant with the joint administration of the recombinant urease protein (rUr) of Helicobacter pylori did not affect the increase in the titer of IgA and IgG in the blood serum; a composition of several adjuvants turned out to be effective [101]. Conversely, in extracts of animal feces, IgA was detected after the introduction of rUr with MDP and was absent in the composition of adjuvants [101].
MPs reduce the IgE titer in individuals with allergic diseases in the case of taking MPs at the stage of remission, as well as in animals with the experimental model of asthma with the preliminary administration of MPs before allergen sensitization, while the severity of the inflammatory process also decreased [40,98].
When mice were immunized with the Huntavirus vaccine, muramyl peptides B30-MDP and MDP-Lys(L18) showed an adjuvant effect and stimulated elevated levels of IgG1 and IgM, while no increase in IgG2 and IgG3 was observed [102]. Muramyl peptides increased antibody titers in mice immunized with a phage suspension [103].
Thus, MPs affect the synthesis of immunoglobulins. The intensity of the impact depends on many factors. The structure of MPs, their introduction into liposomes, route of administration, duration, dose, and properties of the antigen are obvious factors. However, it is additionally necessary to take into account other factors that can have a decisive effect, such as the duration of the early administration of the MPs to the antigen, in which not only the activating effect of the MPs is recorded, but also the suppressive one [40,104]. In addition, the adjuvant properties of MPs depend on the composition of the composition [105] and may depend on the presence of IL-2 and IL-4 [106].
Muramyl peptides change the phenotype and functional activity of neutrophil granulocytes [107,108,109] and natural killer cells (NK cells) [110,111], and activate Th17 [112] and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in response to influenza virus infection [113]. Depending on the microenvironment, MPs polarize the immune response towards Th1 or Th2 [114,115]. Muramyl peptides increase the functional activity of cytotoxic γδ T cells [52,116,117], which are involved not only in the destruction of pathogens and transformed cells, but also in the provision of immunological tolerance.
The effect of MPs on various immunocompetent cells is expressed in the induction of the synthesis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, which activates leukopoiesis and corrects cytopenias [118,119], and hematopoiesis-stimulating activity is also manifested in monotherapy [89,120].
Interesting data on a 1.9-fold increase in the number of multipotent bone marrow stem cells were obtained in bone marrow transplants of mice from bone marrow donors who received single injections of MDP 24 h before transplantation [121]. These results confirm previously obtained data on the correction of cytopenia during chemotherapy [119].
Modern studies have significantly expanded our understanding of the prevalence of muramylpeptide sensors. It turned out that muramylpeptides are able to cross the blood–brain barrier, directly activate brain neurons through NOD2 receptors, and change the activity of a subset of brain neurons that express Nod2 (Figure 2). Activation of Nod2 in the inhibitory neurons of the hypothalamus was found to be necessary for proper control of appetite and body temperature. It was noted that the interaction of MDP with NOD2 affects the feeding behavior of mice, significantly reducing their appetite. In the absence of the NOD2 receptor in neurons, these neurons no longer interact with muramyl peptides, and as a result, the brain loses control over food intake and body temperature. Mice gain weight and become more susceptible to developing type 2 diabetes, especially older females [122].

5. Muramyl Peptide Regulation of Intracellular Signaling Pathways

Muramyl peptides can appear inside cells during active transport with the help of the dipeptide transporter hPepT1, a pore-forming Pannexin-1, during pinocytosis with the capture of dissolved fragments of degraded peptidoglycan, during phagocytosis of bacteria, during lysosomal degradation or during death of bacteria that have penetrated into the cell [123,124,125], and bacteria can also introduce peptidoglycan through pathogenicity islands [126].
At the same time, the hPepT1 transporter delivers ligands only for the NOD2 receptor, but not for NOD1, into the cells [120]. The intracellular sensor of muramyl peptides is the NOD2 protein, which, after interacting with the MP, triggers a cascade of numerous downstream reactions, resulting in the elimination of the pathogen. It is believed that MPs are recognized by the LRR fragment of the NOD2 protein, the NACT domain is responsible for ATP activity and self-oligomerization, and two CARD domains are responsible for protein–protein interactions [127].
The repulsion of the pathogen attack seemed to be the main function of the NOD2 protein, with key amino acid residues that are evolutionarily conserved from bony fish to mammals [128]. Mutations in the NOD2 protein are associated with autoinflammatory diseases [129,130], Crohn’s disease [56], Blau’s syndrome and sarcoidosis [131,132,133].
The interaction of the MPs with the NOD2 protein changes the protein conformation and CARD domains are able to initiate the formation of multiprotein complexes, the first of which is RICK (receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase, also known as RIP2 or RIPK2) [134]. RICK then acquires the ability to interact with LUBAC and TRAF3; in the first case, the nodosome multiprotein complex is assembled with activation of the transcription factor NF-kB, which induces the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and mediators; in the second case, interferon regulatory transcription factor 3 (IRF3) is activated and the IFNα and IFNβ genes are expressed [53]. LUBAC, the ubiquitin linear chain assembly complex (LUBAC), consisting of HOIL-1, SHARPIN, and the catalytically active HOIP subunit, is an E3 ubiquitin-ligating enzyme that, together with ubiquitin-activating (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) enzymes, performs post-translational protein modification ubiquitination. Protein chains ubiquitinated at the K63 lysine residue are recognized by the ubiquitin-binding domains TAB2 or TAB3 [135,136], which leads to the involvement of the TAK/TAB complex, as well as LUBAC [133]. LUBAC then ensures efficient recruitment of NEMO and hence the NEMO/IKKα/IKKβ (NEMO/IKK) complex. These two functional units then jointly trigger the activation of the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways [137].
Translocation of NF-kB to the nucleus is preceded by polyubiquitylation of IKKγ, an inhibitor of the NF-κB (IκB) kinase complex (IKK complex), which also consists of IKKα and IKKβ. This is followed by phosphorylation of IKKβ, and phosphorylation of IκB [138]. Activation of NF-κB is caused by the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and amino-terminal JUN kinase (JNK) p38MAPK [139,140]. At the same time, NOD2-mediated activation of p38 and JNK was required for the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, nitric oxide (NO), and iNOS expression in response to Mycobacterium abscessus [141]. Intranasal administration of MDP reduced bacterial replication in vivo and thus improved lung pathology in mice infected with M. abscessus [141].
It turned out that NOD2 can bind procaspase-1 through the interaction of their CARD–CARD domains to induce the secretion of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) [142]. Activated NOD2 (but not NOD1) also interacts with the intracellular molecule GRIM19 (gene associated with retinoid-IFN-induced mortality 19) [143]. This protein is located on the inner membrane of mitochondria and is homologous to subunit 13 of the 1-alpha NADH dehydrogenase subcomplex of the electron transport chain. The activity of GRIM19 is associated with mitochondrial respiration, and its deficiency leads to exacerbation of the activity of the mitochondrial respiratory chain [144]. GRIM19 attenuates the progression of obesity by controlling adipocyte differentiation, enhances glucose and lipid metabolism in the liver [145], induces p-53-dependent apoptosis in oncotransformed cells [146], increases the level of IFNγ, and regulates the balance of Th17/Treg cells [147]. The CARD domain of the NOD2 protein interacts with other proteins containing such domains and thus may be regulated by other members of the NLR family. In particular, CARD12, also known as IPAF, can bind to NOD2 and inhibit IL-1β production [142]. MDP, by activating NOD2, is a very potent inducer of matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) [148]. MMP-9 is a protease involved in the degradation of extracellular matrix collagen and contributes to the pathogenesis of Streptococcus pneumoniae. MDP had dual effect on IL-1 synthesis. MDP binding to NOD2 induced the activation of Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK-1) and suppressed the activation of IRAK-1 on human mononuclear macrophages during long-term exposure. At the same time, the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-8, and IL-1beta was significantly reduced [149]. Moreover, NOD2 triggers the Notch1 signaling response. The interaction between NOD2 and Notch1-PI3K complex promotes macrophage survival, reduces TNFα/IFNγ-induced apoptosis, and modulates the expression of IL-10 and a number of genes with anti-inflammatory functions [150,151].
It is very important that when pro-inflammatory reactions are activated, the processes of negative regulation are triggered in order to stop the inflammatory response (Figure 3). A20 is a ubiquitin-modifying enzyme that limits signals induced by tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNF), Toll-like (TLR), and NOD2 receptors in vitro and in vivo [152]. A20 performs these functions both by deubiquitinating K63-associated polyubiquitin chains and by adding K48-associated polyubiquitin chains to RIPK2 and TRAF6 signaling proteins [152]. Similarly to A20, proteins OTULIN, CYLD, and MYSM1, they downregulate RIPK2 by deubiquitinating [153,154,155]. RIP2 tyrosine kinase activity has been found to play a dual role in NOD2-dependent autophagy: RIP2 sends a positive autophagy signal via p38 MAPK activation and attenuates autophagy repression mediated by PP2A phosphatase [151,156]. Another example of negative regulation is NOD2-dependent activation of the SOCS-3 protein, which facilitates the dissociation of NOD2 and its chaperone Hsp90, accelerating ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of NOD2 [157]. The proteins Erbin, Centaurin β1, and ATG16L1 directly interact with NOD2 and prevent its biological activity [158,159,160]. Regardless of the adapter RIP2 and the transcription factor NF-kappaB, Nod1 and Nod2 recruit the autophagy-related protein 16 like-1 (ATG16L1) autophagy protein to the plasma membrane at the site of bacterial entry, inducing autophagy and killing the pathogen [161]. ATG16L1 negatively regulates NOD-induced inflammatory responses by interfering with RIPK2 adapter polyubiquitination and preventing nodosome formation [53,124].
Examples of the downregulation of inflammation provide new insight into how these signals are controlled and physiologically limited. Understanding the complexity of coordinating numerous stages of molecular interactions explains the positive effect of the use of drugs based on muramyl peptides, and reveals new possibilities for effective therapy and prevention [4,162].
NOD2 protein is not the only intracellular MPs sensor. The YB1 protein was shown to interact directly with GMDP and activate NOD2 [163]. Cryopyrin, a member of the NLR family, also known as NALP3, is also activated by MDP independently of NOD2 [164]. However, in this case, the molecule activates procaspase-1 and therefore promotes the secretion of IL-1β. On the other hand, it has been shown that ligands other than muramyl peptides exist for the activation of the NOD2 protein, for example, viral RNAs [53], sulfatides (3-O-sulfo-galactoceramide, 3-OSGC), and sulfolipids (Mycobacterium sp. specific sulfolipid-1) [165]. Autophagy and NF-kB signaling are separate functions of NOD2 and they also occur in cells independent of bacterial infection. It is very important that 3-OSGC is an endogenous NOD2 ligand, regulating NOD2 function in vesicular homeostasis, but this does not affect Nf-kB signaling. At the same time, the method of penetration of 3-OSGC located on the outer side of the cell membrane into the cytosol remains unclear; various flippases are considered as candidate transporters, the level of which is increased in Crohn’s disease [166]. A study by Nabatov et al. demonstrates that NOD2 is regulated by hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1 (HIF-1), participates in autophagy, maintaining the acidity of intracellular vesicles [165].
The Tyro3, Axl, and Mer (TAM) receptors inhibit the signaling outcomes of TLR3, TLR4, and TLR9. TAM-deficient mice develop lymphoproliferative diseases and various autoimmune diseases including arthritis, pemphigus vulgaris and lupus, Mer−/− mice show increased TNF-dependent mortality upon acute injection of LPS. Therefore, TAM receptors are critical for the downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines under the conditions of chronic NOD2 stimulation seen in the intestinal environment [167].
Interest in the mechanisms of regulation of immunity in normal and pathological conditions is steadily increasing. The coordination of many multidirectional processes is crucial for maintaining homeostasis. To accurately record the results of studies and visualization, systems biology approaches are used based on the compilation of cause-and-effect relationships, taking into account the type of cells, the registration of molecules at the level of transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome [168,169,170]. Machine-readable languages and various ways of building networks of mutual influences have been formed, which serve as the basis for drug design and the development of effective methods of therapy and prevention.

6. Conclusions

Low molecular weight fragments of bacterial peptidoglycan affect the representatives of the microbiological community inhabiting the skin and mucous membranes, and affect their life cycle and antagonistic relationships.
Muramyl peptides affect not only the immunocompetent cells of a macroorganism, but also almost all cells and tissues, participating in the activation and differentiation of cells, changing their phenotype, promoting migration and stimulating hematopoiesis.
Muramyl peptides of bacterial origin are bioregulators of intracellular processes. They signal the presence of bacteria and trigger not only the pro-inflammatory processes necessary to eliminate the infection, but also the anti-inflammatory processes necessary to stop inflammatory processes and maintain tolerance to the microflora.
A broad spectrum of microorganism-derived low-molecular-weight peptidoglycan fragments regulate host homeostasis and trigger and down-regulate immune responses that, depending on the context, may have opposite effects.

Funding

This paper has been supported by the RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Louca, S.; Shih, P.M.; Pennell, M.W.; Fischer, W.W.; Parfrey, L.W.; Doebeli, M. Bacterial diversification through geological time. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 2, 1458–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, C.; Liang, Y.; Qiao, Y. Messengers from the gut: Gut microbiota-derived metabolites on host regulation. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 863407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chedid, L. Muramyl peptides as possible endogenous immunopharmacological mediators. Microbiol. Immunol. 1983, 27, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Guryanova, S.V.; Khaitov, R.M. Strategies for using muramyl peptides-modulators of innate immunity of bacterial origin-in medicine. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 607178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tukhvatulin, A.; Dzharullaeva, A.; Erokhova, A.; Zemskaya, A.; Balyasin, M.; Ozharovskaia, T.; Zubkova, O.; Shevlyagina, N.; Zhukhovitsky, V.; Fedyakina, I.; et al. Adjuvantation of an influenza hemagglutinin antigen with TLR4 and NOD2 agonists encapsulated in poly(D,L-lactide-Co-glycolide) nanoparticles enhances immunogenicity and protection against lethal influenza virus infection in mice. Vaccines 2020, 8, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fox, A.; Schwab, J.H.; Cochran, T. Muramic acid detection in mammalian tissues by gas-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Infect. Immun. 1980, 29, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kozar, M.P.; Laman, J.D.; Fox, A. Muramic acid is not generally present in the human spleen as determined by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Szponar, B.; Larsson, L. Use of mass spectrometry for characterising microbial communities in bioaerosols. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2001, 8, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Huang, Z.; Wang, J.; Xu, X.; Wang, H.; Qiao, Y.; Chu, W.C.; Xu, S.; Chai, L.; Cottier, F.; Pavelka, N.; et al. Antibody neutralization of microbiota-derived circulating peptidoglycan dampens inflammation and ameliorates autoimmunity. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dziarski, R.; Gupta, D. Peptidoglycan recognition in innate immunity. J. Endotoxin Res. 2005, 11, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Dziarski, R.; Royet, J.; Gupta, D. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins and lysozyme. Encycl. Immunobiol. 2016, 2, 389–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vollmer, W.; Bertsche, U. Murein (peptidoglycan) structure, architecture and biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)–Biomembr. 2008, 1778, 1714–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Irazoki, O.; Hernandez, S.B.; Cava, F. Peptidoglycan muropeptides: Release, perception, and functions as signaling molecules. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Küssau, T.; Van Wyk, N.; Johansen, M.D.; Alsarraf, H.M.A.B.; Neyret, A.; Hamela, C.; Sørensen, K.K.; Thygesen, M.B.; Beauvineau, C.; Kremer, L.; et al. Functional characterization of the N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanine amidase, ami1, from Mycobacterium abscessus. Cells 2020, 9, 2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gao, X.; Huynh, B.-T.; Guillemot, D.; Glaser, P.; Opatowski, L. Inference of significant microbial interactions from longitudinal metagenomics data. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Vermassen, A.; Leroy, S.; Talon, R.; Provot, C.; Popowska, M.; Desvaux, M. Cell wall hydrolases in bacteria: Insight on the diversity of cell wall amidases, glycosidases and peptidases toward peptidoglycan. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ma, J.; Sun, M.; Pan, Z.; Lu, C.; Yao, H. Diverse toxic effectors are harbored by vgrG islands for interbacterial antagonism in type VI secretion system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 1635–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Urdániz, E.; Martín, M.; Payaslián, F.; Defelipe, L.A.; Dodes, M.; Martinez, M.; Alzari, P.M.; Cabrera, G.; Martí, M.A.; Piuri, M. Gp29 LysA of mycobacteriophage TM4 can hydrolyze peptidoglycan through an N-acetyl-muramoyl-L-alanine amidase activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 2022, 1870, 140745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lopez, R.; Garcia, E.; Ronda, C. Bacteriophages of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1981, 3, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Vollmer, W.; Joris, B.; Charlier, P.; Foster, S. Bacterial peptidoglycan (murein) hydrolases. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 32, 259–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jiang, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Guo, J.; Liu, W.; Meng, G.; Zhang, L.; Li, M.; Cong, L.; Sun, M. Recent insights into the prognostic and therapeutic applications of lysozymes. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 767642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Prescott, D.; Maisonneuve, C.; Yadav, J.; Rubino, S.J.; Girardin, S.E.; Philpott, D.J. NOD2 modulates immune tolerance via the GM-CSF–dependent generation of CD103+ dendritic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 10946–10957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fox, A.; Fox, K. Rapid elimination of a synthetic adjuvant peptide from the circulation after systemic administration and absence of detectable natural muramyl peptides in normal serum at current analytical limits. Infect. Immun. 1991, 59, 1202–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kozar, M.P.; Krahmer, M.T.; Fox, A.; Gray, B.M. Failure to detect muramic acid in normal rat tissues but detection in cerebrospinal fluids from patients with Pneumococcal meningitis. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 4688–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Parant, M.; Parant, F.; Chedid, L.; Yapo, A.; Petit, J.F.; Lederer, E. Fate of the synthetic immunoadjuvant, muramyl dipeptide (14C-Iabelled) in the mouse. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1979, 1, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Molinaro, R.; Mukherjee, T.; Flick, R.; Philpott, D.J.; Girardin, S.E. Trace levels of peptidoglycan in serum underlie the NOD-dependent cytokine response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 31, 9007–9015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Park, J.T. Turnover and recycling of the murein sacculus in oligopeptide permease-negative strains of Escherichia coli: Indirect evidence for an alternative permease system and for a monolayered sacculus. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Goodell, E.W. Recycling of murein by Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1985, 163, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Schaub, R.E.; Dillard, J.P. The Pathogenic neisseria use a streamlined set of peptidoglycan degradation proteins for peptidoglycan remodeling, recycling, and toxic fragment release. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Goodell, E.W.; Schwarz, U. Высвoбoждение пептидoв клетoчнoй стенки в культуральную среду экспoненциальнo растущей Escherichia coli. Дж. Бактериoл 1985, 162, 391–397. [Google Scholar]
  31. Goldman, W.E.; Klapper, D.G.; Baseman, J.B. Detection, isolation, and analysis of a released Bordetella pertussis product toxic to cultured tracheal cells. Infect. Immun. 1982, 36, 782–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Cookson, B.T.; Cho, H.L.; Herwaldt, L.A.; Goldman, W.E. Biological activities and chemical composition of purified tracheal cytotoxin of Bordetella pertussis. Infect. Immun. 1989, 57, 2223–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sinha, R.K.; Rosenthal, R.S. Release of soluble peptidoglycan from growing conococci: Demonstration of anhydro-muramyl-containing fragments. Infect. Immun. 1980, 29, 914–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rosenthal, R.S.; Nogami, W.; Cookson, B.T.; Goldman, W.E.; Folkening, W.J. Major fragment of soluble peptidoglycan released from growing Bordetella pertussis is tracheal cytotoxin. Infect. Immun. 1987, 55, 2117–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Nigro, G.; Fazio, L.L.; Martino, M.C.; Rossi, G.; Tattoli, I.; Liparoti, V.; De Castro, C.; Molinaro, A.; Philpott, D.J.; Bernardini, M.L. Muramylpeptide shedding modulates cell sensing of Shigella flexneri. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10, 682–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wysocka, M.; Dzierzbicka, K.; Krawczyk, B. Evaluating the antibacterial activity of muramyl dipeptide derivatives, retro-tuftsin derivatives, and anthraquinone oligopeptides against a range of pathogenic bacteria. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2021, 68, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dik, D.A.; Fisher, J.F.; Mobashery, S. Cell-wall recycling of the gram-negative bacteria and the nexus to antibiotic resistance. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5952–5984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nikitushkin, V.D.; Demina, G.R.; Shleeva, M.O.; Guryanova, S.V.; Ruggiero, A.; Berisio, R.; Kaprelyants, A.S. A product of RpfB and RipA joint enzymatic action promotes the resuscitation of dormant mycobacteria. FEBS J. 2015, 282, 2500–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Guryanova, S.V.; Borisova OYu Kolesnikova, N.V.; Lezhava, N.L.; Kozlov, I.G.; Gudima, G.O. Effect of muramyl peptide on the microbial landscape of the oral cavity. Immunologiya 2019, 40, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guryanova, S.V.; Kolesnikova, N.V.; Gudima, G.O.; Lezhava, N.L.; Karaulov, A.V. Dynamics of immunological and microbiological indicators of oral fluid in caries therapy. Immunologiya 2021, 42, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Venkataprasad, N. Evidence of differential mycobacterial growth and modulation of mycobactericidal property by glucoaminylmuramyl dipeptide in murine macrophages. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1997, 832, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chedid, L.; Parant, M.; Parant, F.; Lefrancher, P.; Choay, J.; Lederer, E. Enhancement of nonspecific immunity to Klebsiella pneumoniae infection by a synthetic immunoadjuvant (N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine) and several analogs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 2089–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Parant, M.; Parant, F.; Chedid, L. Enhancement of the neonate’s nonspecific immunity to Klebsiella infection by muramyl dipeptide, a synthetic immunoadjuvant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1978, 75, 3395–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Venkataprasad, N.; Ledger, P.; Ivanyi, J. The effect of glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptide injection to mice on the course of tuberculous infection and in vitro superoxide anion production. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1997, 114, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Meshcheryakova, E.; Guryanova, S.; Makarov, E.; Alekseeva, L.; Andronova, T.; Ivanov, V. Prevention of experimental septic shock by pretreatment of mice with muramyl peptides. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2001, 1, 1857–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Grabchenko, N.I.; Karpov, A.V.; VIa, C.; Tkachikova, L.; Spivak, N. Vliianie sinteticheskikh proizvodnykh muramildipeptida na techenie stafilokokkovoĭ infektsii u mysheĭ [Effect of synthetic muramyl dipeptide derivatives on staphylococcal infection in mice]. Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 2001, 3, 50–53. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  47. Fraser-Smith, E.B.; Matthews, T.R. Protective effect of muramyl dipeptide analogs against infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Candida albicans in mice. Infect. Immun. 1981, 34, 676–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Onozuka, K.; Shinomiya, H.; Cho, N.; Saito-Taki, T.; Nakano, M. The adjuvant effect of a muramyl dipeptide (MDP) analog on temperature-sensitive Salmonella mutant vaccine. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1989, 11, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fraser-Smith, E.B.; Waters, R.V.; Matthews, T.R. Correlation between in vivo anti-Pseudomonas and anti-Candida activities and clearance of carbon by the reticuloendothelial system for various muramyl dipeptide analogs, using normal and immunosuppressed mice. Infect. Immun. 1982, 35, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Phillips, N.C.; Chedid, L. Anti-infectious activity of liposomal muramyl dipeptides in immunodeficient CBA/N mice. Infect. Immun. 1987, 55, 1426–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Onozuka, K.; Saito-Taki, T.; Nakano, M. Augmentation of protective and antibacterial activity induced by muramyl dipeptides in CBA/N defective mice with X-linked immunodeficiency for Salmonella enteritidis infection. Infect. Immun. 1984, 45, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Lupfer, C.; Thomas, P.G.; Kanneganti, T.-D. Nucleotide oligomerization and binding domain 2-dependent dendritic cell activation is necessary for innate immunity and optimal CD8+ T cell responses to influenza A virus infection. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 8946–8955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Mukherjee, T.; Hovingh, E.S.; Foerster, E.G.; Abdel-Nour, M.; Philpott, D.J.; Girardin, S.E. NOD1 and NOD2 in inflammation, immunity and disease. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 670, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cummings, N.P.; Pabst, M.J.; Johnston, R.B., Jr. Activation of macrophages for enhanced release of superoxide anion and greater killing of Candida albicans by injection of muramyl dipeptide. J. Exp. Med. 1980, 152, 1659–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Girardin, S.E.; Boneca, I.G.; Viala, J.; Chamaillard, M.; Labigne, A.; Thomas, G.; Philpott, D.J.; Sansonetti, P.J. Nod2 is a general sensor of peptidoglycan through muramyl dipeptide (MDP) detection. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 8869–8872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Inohara, N.; Ogura, Y.; Fontalba, A.; Gutierrez, O.; Pons, F.; Crespo, J.; Fukase, K.; Inamura, S.; Kusumoto, S.; Hashimoto, M.; et al. Host recognition of bacterial muramyl dipeptide mediated through NOD2. Implications for Crohn’s disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 5509–5512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Girardin, S.E.; Boneca, I.G.; Carneiro, L.A.M.; Antignac, A.; Jehanno, M.; Viala, J.; Tedin, K.; Taha, M.K.; Labigne, A.; Zäthringer, U.; et al. Nod1 detects a unique muropeptide from gram-negative bacterial peptidoglycan. Science 2003, 300, 1584–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kanazawa, N.; Okafuji, I.; Kambe, N.; Nishikomori, R.; Nakata-Hizume, M.; Nagai, S.; Fuji, A.; Yuasa, T.; Manki, A.; Sakurai, Y.; et al. Early-onset sarcoidosis and CARD15 mutations with constitutive nuclear factor-kappaB activation: Common genetic etiology with Blau syndrome. Blood 2005, 105, 1195–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Miceli-Richard, C.; Lesage, S.; Rybojad, M.; Prieur, A.M.; Manouvrier-Hanu, S.; Hafner, R.; Chamaillard, M.; Zouali, H.; Thomas, G.; Hugot, J.P. CARD15 mutations in Blau syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29, 19–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Trindade, B.C.; Chen, G.Y. NOD1 and NOD2 in inflammatory and infectious diseases. Immunol Rev. 2020, 297, 139–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kutikhin, A.G. Role of NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15 gene polymorphisms in cancer etiology. Hum. Immunol. 2011, 72, 955–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lynch, H.T.; Brand, R.E.; Locker, G.Y. Inflammatory bowel disease in Ashkenazi Jews: Implications for familial colorectal cancer. Fam. Cancer 2004, 3, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bialecka, M.; Kurzawski, M.; Klodowska-Duda, G.; Opala, G.; Juzwiak, S.; Kurzawski, G.; Tan, E.K.; Drozdzik, M. CARD15 variants in patients with sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 57, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cummings, N.P.; Neifert, M.R.; Pabst, M.J.; Johnston, R.B., Jr. Oxidative metabolic response and microbicidal activity of human milk macrophages: Effect of lipopolysaccharide and muramyl dipeptide. Infect Immun. 1985, 49, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Pabst, M.J.; Beranova-Giorgianni, S.; Krueger, J.M. Effects of muramyl peptides on macrophages, monokines, and sleep. Neuroimmunomodulation 1999, 6, 261–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pashenkov, M.V.; Balyasova, L.S.; Dagil, Y.A.; Pinegin, B.V. The role of the p38-MNK-eIF4E signaling axis in TNF production downstream of the NOD1 receptor. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 1638–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Guryanova, S.; Udzhukhu, V.; Kubylinsky, A. Pathogenetic therapy of psoriasis by muramyl peptide. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Heinzelmann, M.; Polk, H.C., Jr.; Chernobelsky, A.; Stites, T.P.; Gordon, L.E. Endotoxin and muramyl dipeptide modulate surface receptor expression on human mononuclear cells. Immunopharmacology 2000, 48, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guryanova, S.V.; Kudryashova, N.A.; Kataeva, A.A.; Orozbekova, B.T.; Kolesnikova, N.V.; Chuchalin, A.G. Novel approaches to increase resistance to acute respiratory infections. RUDN J. Med. 2021, 25, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Traub, S.; Kubasch, N.; Morath, S.; Kresse, M.; Hartung, T.; Schmidt, R.R.; Hermann, C. Structural requirements of synthetic muropeptides to synergize with lipopolysaccharide in cytokine induction. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 8694–8700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Pashenkov, M.V.; Murugina, N.E.; Budikhina, A.S.; Pinegin, B.V. Synergistic interactions between NOD receptors and TLRs: Mechanisms and clinical implications. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 105, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lebedeva, E.S.; Bagaev, A.V.; Chulkina, M.M.; Pichugin, A.V.; Ataullakhanov, R.I. Synergistic activation of gene transcription encoding type I interferons and cytokines in macrophages and dendritic cells by the combinations of two PRR-agonists. Immunologiya 2017, 38, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pouillart, P.R.; Audibert, F.M.; Chedid, L.A.; Lefrancier, P.L.; Bahr, G.M. Enhancement by muramyl peptides of the protective response of interferon-α/β against encephalomyocarditis virus infection. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1996, 18, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fevrier, M.; Birrien, J.L.; Leclerc, C.; Chedid, L.; Liacopoulos, P. The macrophage, target cell of the synthetic adjuvant muramyl dipeptide. Eur. J. Immunol. 1978, 8, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Meshcheryakova, E.A.; Guryanova, S.V.; Makarov, E.A.; Andronova, T.M.; Ivanov, V.T. Structure-function investigation of glucosaminylmuramoylpeptides. Influence of chemical modification of N-acetylglucosaminyl-Nacetylmuramoyldipeptide (GMDP) on its immunomodulatory properties in vivo and in vitro. Bioorg. Chem. 1991, 17, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar]
  76. Fukuyama, R.; Takeda, H.; Fushiki, S.; Yamamoto, T. Muramyl dipeptide injected into crushed sciatic nerve, activates macrophages and promotes recovery of walking locomotion in rats. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 1998, 13, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Todate, A.; Suda, T.; Kuwata, H.; Chida, K.; Nakamura, H. Muramyl dipeptide-Lys stimulates the function of human dendritic cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2001, 70, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Kurobe, H.; Liu, C.; Ueno, T.; Saito, F.; Ohigashi, I.; Seach, N.; Arakaki, R.; Hayashi, Y.; Kitagawa, T.; Lipp, M.; et al. CCR7-dependent cortex-to-medulla migration of positively selected thymocytes is essential for establishing central tolerance. Immunity 2006, 24, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Iwasaki, A.; Medzhitov, R. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ohta, T.; Sugiyama, M.; Hemmi, H.; Yamazaki, C.; Okura, S.; Sasaki, I. Crucial roles of XCR1-expressing dendritic cells and the XCR1-XCL1 chemokine axis in intestinal immune homeostasis. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 23505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Alexandre, Y.O.; Ghilas, S.; Sanchez, C.; Le Bon, A.; Crozat, K.; Dalod, M. XCR1+ dendritic cells promote memory CD8+ T cell recall upon secondary infections with Listeria monocytogenes or certain viruses. J. Exp. Med. 2016, 213, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Lei, Y.; Takahama, Y. XCL1 and XCR1 in the immune system. Microbes Infect. 2012, 14, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lei, Y.; Ripen, A.M.; Ishimaru, N.; Ohigashi, I.; Nagasawa, T.; Jeker, L.T.; Bösl, M.R.; Holländer, G.A.; Hayashi, Y.; Malefyt Rde, W.; et al. Aire-dependent production of XCL1 mediates medullary accumulation of thymic dendritic cells and contributes to regulatory T cell development. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Ishida, M.; Kitaura, H.; Kimura, K.; Sugisawa, H.; Aonuma, T.; Takada, H.; Takano-Yamamoto, T. Muramyl dipeptide enhances lipopolysaccharide-induced osteoclast formation and bone resorption through increased RANKL expression in stromal cells. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 132765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ke, K.; Sul, O.; Chung, S.; Suh, J.; Choi, H. Lack of NOD2 attenuates ovariectomy-induced bone loss via inhibition of osteoclasts. J. Endocrinol. 2017, 235, 85–96. Available online: https://joe.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/joe/235/2/JOE-16-0591.xml (accessed on 11 January 2021). [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, M.; Ye, X.; Hu, J.; Zhao, Q.; Lv, B.; Ma, W.; Wang, W.; Yin, H.; Hao, Q.; Zhou, C.; et al. NOD1/RIP2 signalling enhances the microglia-driven inflammatory response and undergoes crosstalk with inflammatory cytokines to exacerbate brain damage following intracerebral haemorrhage in mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tsujimoto, M.; Kinoshita, F.; Okunaga, T.; Kotani, S.; Kusumoto, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Shiba, T. Higher immunoadjuvant activities of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminyl-(1-4)-N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine in comparison with N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine. Microbiol. Immunol. 1979, 23, 933–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Wuest, B.; Wachsmuth, E.D. Stimulatory effect of N-acetyl muramyl dipeptide in vivo: Proliferation of bone marrow progenitor cells in mice. Infect. Immun. 1982, 37, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Ellouz, F.; Adam, A.; Ciorbaru, R.; Lederer, E. Minimal structural requirements for adjuvant activity of bacterial peptidoglycan derivatives. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1974, 59, 1317–1325. [Google Scholar]
  90. O’Reilly, T.; Zak, O. Enhancement of the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy by muramyl peptide immunomodulators. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1992, 14, 1100–1109. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Merser, C.; Sinay, P.; Adam, A. Total synthesis and adjuvant activity of bacterial peptidoglycan derivatives. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1975, 66, 1316–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ogawa, C.; Liu, Y.J.; Kobayashi, K.S. Muramyl dipeptide and its derivatives: Peptide adjuvant in immunological disorders and cancer therapy. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2011, 7, 180–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Konorev, M.R.; Guryanova, S.V.; Tyshevich, E.N.; Pavlyukov, R.A.; Borisova, O.Y. Advisable including glucosaminylmuramyldipeptide in Helicobacter pylori therapy: Experience of ten-year investigation. RUDN J. Med. 2020, 24, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Adam, A.; Lederer, E. Muramyl peptides: Immunomodulators, sleep factors, and vitamins. In Medical Research Reviews; Stevens, D.G., Ed.; Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1984; Volume 4, pp. 111–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kotani, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Kinoshita, F.; Shimono, T.; Morisaki, I. Immunoadjuvant activities of synthetic N-acetyl-muramyl-peptides or -amino acids. Biken J. J. Res. Inst. Microb. Dis. 1975, 18, 105–111. [Google Scholar]
  96. Heymer, B.; Finger, H.; Wirsing, C.H. Immunoadjuvant effects of the synthetic muramyl-dipeptide (MDP) N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine. Z. Immunitatsforsch. Immunobiol. 1978, 155, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bomford, R. Will adjuvants be needed for vaccines of the future? Dev. Biol. Stand. 1998, 92, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Kolesnikova, N.V.; Kozlov, I.G.; Guryanova, S.V.; Kokov, E.A.; Andronova, T.M. Clinical and immunological efficiency of muramyl dipeptide in the treatment of atopic diseases. Med. Immunol. 2016, 18, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Morisaki, I.; Michalek, S.M.; Harmon, C.C.; Torii, M.; Hamada, S.; McGhee, J.R. Effective immunity to dental caries: Enhancement of salivary anti-Streptococcus mutans antibody responses with oral adjuvants. Infect. Immun. 1983, 40, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Kalyuzhin, O.V.; Letyaeva, O.I.; Ziganshin, O.R.; Markeeva, D.A.; Blokhina, Y.u.V.; Fedenko, E.S.; Popilyuk, S.F. A combination of three muramyl peptides derived from gramnegative bacteria in immunotherapy of chronic pyodermia. Med. Immunol. 2019, 21, 1187–1196. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Moschos, S.A.; Bramwell, V.W.; Somavarapu, S.; Alpar, H.O. Adjuvant synergy: The effects of nasal coadministration of adjuvants. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2004, 82, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yoo, Y.C.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Koike, Y.; Hatsuse, R.; Yamanishi, K.; Tanishita, O.; Arikawa, J.; Azuma, I. Adjuvant activity of muramyl dipeptide derivatives to enhance immunogenicity of a hantavirus-inactivated vaccine. Vaccine 1998, 16, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rechkina, E.A.; Denisova, G.F.; Masalova, O.V.; Lideman, L.F.; Denisov, D.A.; Lesnova, E.I.; Ataullakhanov, R.I.; Gur’ianova, S.V.; Kushch, A.A. Epitope mapping of antigenic determinants of hepatitis C virus proteins by phage display. Mol. Biol. 2006, 40, 357–368. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Souvannavong, V.; Adam, A. Opposite effects of the synthetic adjuvant N-acetyl-muramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine on the immune response in mice depending on experimental conditions. Eur. J. Immunol. 1980, 10, 654–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zunic, M.; Kricek, F.; Dukor, P.; Bahr, G.M. Oral administration of muramyl dipeptide into mice modulates cell proliferation, immunoglobulin synthesis, and cytokine mRNA levels in gut associated lymphoid tissues. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1996, 18, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Souvannavong, V.; Brown, S.; Adam, A. Muramyl dipeptide (MDP) synergizes with interleukin 2 and interleukin 4 to stimulate, respectively, the differentiation and proliferation of B cells. Cell Immunol. 1990, 126, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Nesterova, I.V.; Khaidukov, S.V.; Nguyen, T.D.L.; Rongina, A.N.; Guryanova, S.V. Glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptide modulate experimental transformed phenotype of neutrophilic granulocytes of healthy persons. Russ. J. Immunol. 2017, 11, 737–740. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  108. Jeong, Y.-J.; Kang, M.-J.; Lee, S.-J.; Kim, C.-H.; Kim, J.-C.; Kim, T.-H.; Kim, D.-J.; Kim, D.; Núñez, G.; Park, J.-H. Nod2 and Rip2 contribute to innate immune responses in mouse neutrophils. Immunology 2014, 143, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Nesterova, I.V.; Nguyen, T.D.L.; Khalturina, E.; Khaidukov, S.V.; Guryanova, S.V. The modulatory effects of glucosaminylmuramildipeptide on the transformed phenotype of the subset of Ifna/br1+Ifngr+TLR4+ neutrophilic granulocytes of patients with chronic herpes-viral infections in the experiment in vitro. Russ. Immunol. J. 2018, 12, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Guryanova, S.V.; Gaponov, A.M.; Pisarev, V.M.; Yakushenko, E.V.; Tutelyan, A.V.; Aleksandrov, I.A.; Tsipandina, E.V.; Kozlov, I.G. Glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptide acid (GMDP-A) modulates the intracellular signaling pathways of natural killer cells. Immunologiya 2020, 41, 235–248. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Athie’-Morales, V.; O’Connor, G.M.; Gardiner, C.M. Activation of human Nk cells by the bacterial pathogen-associated molecular pattern muramyl dipeptide. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 4082–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Manni, M.; Ding, W.; Stohl, L.L.; Granstein, R.D. Muramyl dipeptide induces Th17 polarization through activation of endothelial cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 3356–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Egarnes, B.; Gosselin, J. Contribution of regulatory T cells in nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 response to influenza virus infection. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Magalhaes, J.G.; Fritz, J.H.; Le Bourhis, L.; Sellge, G.; Travassos, L.H.; Selvanantham, T.; Girardin, S.E.; Gommerman, J.L.; Philpott, D.J. Nod2-dependent Th2 polarization of antigen-specific immunity. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 7925–7935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Guryanova, S.V.; Kozlov, I.G.; Meshcheryakova, E.A.; Alekseeva, L.G.; Andronova, T.M. Investigation into the influence of glucosaminylmuramyl dipeptide on the normalization of Th1/TH2 balance in patients with atopic bronchial asthma. Immunol. Immunol. 2009, 30, 305–309. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  116. Hornung, R.L.; Longo, D.L.; Gowda, V.L.; Kwak, L.W. Induction of a CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to soluble antigen given together with a novel muramyl dipeptide adjuvant, N-acetyl-D-glucosaminyl-(beta 1-4)-N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine (GMDP). Ther. Immunol. 1995, 2, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  117. Lin, G.H.Y.; Wortzman, M.E.; Girardin, S.E.; Philpott, D.J.; Watts, T.H. T Cell intrinsic Nod2 is dispensable for CD8 T Cell immunity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kerns, H.M.M.; Jutila, M.A.; Hedges, J.F. The distinct response of gd T cells to the Nod2 agonist muramyl dipeptide. Cell Immunol. 2009, 257, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Manapova, E.R.; Fazylov, V.K.H.; Guryanova, S.V. Сytopenia and their correction in antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C in patients with genotype 1. Probl. Virol. 2017, 62, 174–178. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Dokter, W.H.; Dijkstra, A.J.; Koopmans, S.B.; Mulder, A.B.; Stulp, B.K.; Halie, M.R.; Keck, W.; Vellenga, E. G(AnH)MTetra, a naturally occurring 1,6-anhydro muramyl dipeptide, induces granulocyte colony-stimulating factor expression in human monocytes: A molecular analysis. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 2953–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Gorskaya, Y.F.; Semenova, E.N.; Nagurskaya, E.V.; Bekhalo, V.A.; Nesterenko, V.G. Simultaneous administration of NOD-2 (MDP) and TLP-4 (LPS) ligands to bone marrow donors 24 h before transplantation increases the content of multipotent stromal cells (MSCs) in bone marrow grafts in CBA mice compared to the total result of their isolated administration. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2021, 172, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Gabanyi, I.; Lepousez, G.; Wheeler, R.; Vieites-Prado, A.; Nissant, A.; Wagner, S.; Moigneu, C.; Dulauroy, S.; Hicham, S.; Polomack, B.; et al. Bacterial sensing via neuronal Nod2 regulates appetite and body temperature. Science 2022, 376, eabj3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ismair, M.G.; Vavricka, S.R.; Kullak-Ublick, G.A.; Fried, M.; Mengin-Lecreulx, D.; Girardin, S.E. hPepT1 selectively transports muramyl dipeptide but not Nod1-activating muramyl peptides. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2007, 84, 1313–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Marina-García, N.; Franchi, L.; Kim, Y.G.; Miller, D.; McDonald, C.; Boons, G.J.; Núñez, G. Pannexin-1-mediated intracellular delivery of muramyl dipeptide induces caspase-1 activation via cryopyrin/NLRP3 independently of Nod2. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 4050–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Caruso, R.; Warner, N.; Inohara, N.; Núñez, G. NOD1 and NOD2: Signaling, host defense, and inflammatory disease. Immunity 2014, 41, 898–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Viala, J.; Chaput, C.; Boneca, I.G.; Cardona, A.; Girardin, S.E.; Moran, A.P.; Athman, R.; Mémet, S.; Huerre, M.R.; Coyle, A.J.; et al. Nod1 responds to peptidoglycan delivered by the Helicobacter pylori cag pathogenicity island. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Strober, W.; Murray, P.J.; Kitani, A.; Watanabe, T. Signalling pathways and molecular interactions of NOD1 and NOD2. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Vijayrajratnam, S.; Pushkaran, A.C.; Balakrishnan, A.; Vasudevan, A.K.; Biswas, R.; Mohan, C.G. Understanding the molecular differential recognition of muramyl peptide ligands by LRR domains of human NOD receptors. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 2691–2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Yao, Q.; Shen, M.; McDonald, C.; Lacbawan, F.; Moran, R.; Shen, B. NOD2-associated autoinflammatory disease: A large cohort study. Rheumatology 2015, 54, 1904–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. McDonald, C.; Shen, M.; Johnson, E.E.; Kabi, A.; Yao, Q. Alterations in nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-2 expression, pathway activation, and cytokine production in Yao syndrome. Autoimmunity 2018, 51, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Shen, M.; Moran, R.; Tomecki, K.J.; Yao, Q. Granulomatous disease associated with NOD2 sequence variants and familial camptodactyly: An intermediate form of NOD2-associated diseases? Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2015, 45, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Caso, F.; Galozzi, P.; Costa, L.; Sfriso, P.; Cantarini, L.; Punzi, L. Autoinflammatory granulomatous diseases: From Blau syndrome and early-onset sarcoidosis to NOD2-mediated disease and Crohn’s disease. RMD Open 2015, 1, e000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Iwasaki, T.; Kaneko, N.; Ito, Y.; Takeda, H.; Sawasaki, T.; Heike, T.; Migita, K.; Agematsu, K.; Kawakami, A.; Morikawa, S.; et al. Nod2-nodosome in a cell-free system: Implications in pathogenesis and drug discovery for Blau syndrome and early-onset sarcoidosis. Sci. World J. 2016, 2016, 2597376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Ogura, Y.; Inohara, N.; Benito, A.; Chen, F.F.; Yamaoka, S.; Nunez, G. Nod2, a Nod1/Apaf-1 family member that is restricted to monocytes and activates NF-kappaB. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 4812–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Kanayama, A.; Seth, R.B.; Sun, L.; Ea, C.K.; Hong, M.; Shaito, A.; Chiu, Y.H.; Deng, L.; Chen, Z.J. TAB2 and TAB3 activate the NF-kappaB pathway through binding to polyubiquitin chains. Mol. Cell 2004, 15, 535–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Wang, C.; Deng, L.; Hong, M.; Akkaraju, G.R.; Inoue, J.; Chen, Z.J. TAK1 is a ubiquitin-dependent kinase of MKK and IKK. Nature 2001, 412, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Draber, P.; Kupka, S.; Reichert, M.; Draberova, H.; Lafont, E.; de Miguel, D.; Spilgies, L.; Surinova, S.; Taraborrelli, L.; Hartwig, T.; et al. LUBAC-recruited CYLD and A20 regulate gene activation and cell death by exerting opposing effects on linear ubiquitin in signaling complexes. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 2258–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Walczak, H.; Iwai, K.; Dikic, I. Generation and physiological roles of linear ubiquitin chains. BMC Biol. 2012, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Pauleau, A.L.; Murray, P.J. Role of Nod2 in the response of macrophages to Toll-like receptor agonists. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 23, 7531–7539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Kobayashi, K.S.; Chamaillard, M.; Ogura, Y.; Henegariu, O.; Inohara, N.; Nuñez, G.; Flavell, R.A. Nod2-dependent regulation of innate and adaptive immunity in the intestinal tract. Science 2005, 307, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lee, J.Y.; Lee, M.S.; Kim, D.J.; Yang, S.J.; Lee, S.J.; Noh, E.J.; Shin, S.J.; Park, J.H. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 contributes to limiting growth of mycobacterium abscessus in the lung of mice by regulating cytokines and nitric oxide production. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Damiano, J.S.; Oliveira, V.; Welsh, K.; Reed, J.C. Heterotypic interactions among NACHT domains: Implications for regulation of innate immune responses. Biochem. J. 2004, 381, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Barnich, N.; Hisamatsu, T.; Aguirre, J.E.; Xavier, R.; Reinecker, H.C.; Podolsky, D.K. GRIM-19 interacts with nucleotide oligomerization domain 2 and serves as downstream effector of anti-bacterial function in intestinal epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 19021–19026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Huang, G.; Lu, H.; Hao, A.; Ng, D.C.; Ponniah, S.; Guo, K.; Lufei, C.; Zeng, Q.; Cao, X. GRIM-19, a cell death regulatory protein, is essential for assembly and function of mitochondrial complex I. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 24, 8447–8456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Jhun, J.; Woo, J.S.; Lee, S.H.; Jeong, J.H.; Jung, K.; Hur, W.; Lee, S.Y.; Ryu, J.Y.; Moon, Y.M.; Jung, Y.J.; et al. GRIM19 impedes obesity by regulating inflammatory white fat browning and promoting Th17/Treg balance. Cells 2021, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wang, D.; Wei, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Kalvakolanu, D.V.; Guo, B.; Zhang, L. GRIM-19 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in a p53-dependent manner in colorectal cancer cells through the SIRT7/PCAF/MDM2 axis. Exp. Cell Res. 2021, 407, 112799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Moon, J.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Ryu, J.; Jhun, J.; Choi, J.; Kim, G.N.; Roh, S.; Park, S.H.; Cho, M.L. GRIM-19 ameliorates multiple sclerosis in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with reciprocal regulation of IFNγ/Th1 and IL-17A/Th17 cells. Immune Netw. 2020, 20, e40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Vissers, M.; Hartman, Y.; Groh, L.; de Jong, D.J.; de Jonge, M.I.; Ferwerda, G. Recognition of Streptococcus pneumoniae and muramyl dipeptide by NOD2 results in potent induction of MMP-9, which can be controlled by lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 4952–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Hedl, M.; Li, J.; Cho, J.H.; Abraham, C. Chronic stimulation of Nod2 mediates tolerance to bacterial products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19440–19445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Bansal, K.; Balaji, K.N. Intracellular pathogen sensor NOD2 programs macrophages to trigger Notch1 activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 5823–5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Negroni, A.; Pierdomenico, M.; Cucchiara, S.; Stronati, L. NOD2 and inflammation: Current insights. J. Inflamm. Res. 2018, 11, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Hitotsumatsu, O.; Ahmad, R.C.; Tavares, R.; Wang, M.; Philpott, D.; Turer, E.E.; Lee, B.L.; Shiffin, N.; Advincula, R.; Malynn, B.A.; et al. The ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20 restricts nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2-triggered signals. Immunity 2008, 28, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Fiil, B.K.; Damgaard, R.B.; Wagner, S.A.; Keusekotten, K.; Fritsch, M.; Bekker-Jensen, S.; Mailand, N.; Choudhary, C.; Komander, D.; Gyrd-Hansen, M. OTULIN restricts Met1-linked ubiquitination to control innate immune signaling. Mol. Cell 2013, 50, 818–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Wex, K.; Schmid, U.; Just, S.; Wang, X.; Wurm, R.; Naumann, M.; Schlüter, D.; Nishanth, G. Receptorinteracting protein kinase-2 inhibition by cyld impairs antibacterial immune responses in macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2016, 6, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Panda, S.; Gekara, N.O. The deubiquitinase MYSM1 dampens NOD2-mediated inflammation and tissue damage by inactivating the RIP2 complex. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Homer, C.R.; Kabi, A.; Marina-García, N.; Sreekumar, A.; Nesvizhskii, A.I.; Nickerson, K.P.; Chinnaiyan, A.M.; Nuñez, G.; McDonald, C. A dual role for receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIP2) kinase activity in nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2)-dependent autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 25565–25576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Lee, K.H.; Biswas, A.; Liu, Y.J.; Kobayashi, K.S. Proteasomal degradation of Nod2 protein mediates tolerance to bacterial cell wall components. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 39800–39811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Kufer, T.A.; Kremmer, E.; Banks, D.J.; Philpott, D.J. Role for erbin in bacterial activation of Nod2. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 3115–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Yamamoto-Furusho, J.K.; Barnich, N.; Xavier, R.; Hisamatsu, T.; Podolsky, D.K. Centaurin β1 down-regulates nucleotide-binding oligomerization domains 1- and 2-dependent NF-κB activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 36060–36070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Sorbara, M.T.; Ellison, L.K.; Ramjeet, M.; Travassos, L.H.; Jones, N.L.; Girardin, S.E.; Philpott, D.J. The protein ATG16L1 suppresses inflammatory cytokines induced by the intracellular sensors Nod1 and Nod2 in an autophagy-independent manner. Immunity 2013, 39, 858–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Travassos, L.H.; Carneiro, L.A.; Ramjeet, M.; Hussey, S.; Kim, Y.G.; Magalhães, J.G.; Yuan, L.; Soares, F.; Chea, E.; Le Bourhis, L.; et al. Nod1 and Nod2 direct autophagy by recruiting ATG16L1 to the plasma membrane at the site of bacterial entry. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Guryanova, S.V.; Khaitov, R.M. Glucosaminylmuramyldipeptide–GMDP: Effect on mucosal immunity (on the issue of immunotherapy and immunoprophylaxis). Immunologiya 2020, 41, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Laman, A.G.; Lathe, R.; Shepelyakovskaya, A.O.; Gartseva, A.; Brovko, F.A.; Guryanova, S.; Alekseeva, L.; Meshcheryakova, E.A.; Ivanov, V.T. Muramyl peptides activate innate immunity conjointly via YB1 and NOD2. Innate Immun. 2016, 22, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Martinon, F.; Agostini, L.; Meylan, E.; Tschopp, J. Identification of bacterial muramyl dipeptide as activator of the NALP3/cryopyrin inflammasome. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14, 1929–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Nabatov, A.A.; Hatzis, P.; Rouschop, K.M.; van Diest, P.; Vooijs, M. Hypoxia inducible NOD2 interacts with 3-O-sulfogalactoceramide and regulates vesicular homeostasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1830, 5277–5286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Blomqvist, M.; Osterbye, T.; Månsson, J.E.; Buschard, K.; Fredman, P. Uptake of the glycosphingolipid sulfatide in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas in vivo and in isolated islets of Langerhans. Lipids Health Dis. 2006, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Zheng, S.; Hedl, M.; Abraham, C. TAM receptor-dependent regulation of SOCS3 and MAPKs contributes to proinflammatory cytokine downregulation following chronic NOD2 stimulation of human macrophages. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 1928–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Guryanova, S.; Guryanova, A. sbv IMPROVER: Modern approach to systems biology. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1613, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. sbv IMPROVER Project Team (in alphabetical order); Boue, S.; Fields, B.; Hoeng, J.; Park, J.; Peitsch, M.C.; Schlage, W.K.; Talikka MChallenge Best Performers (in alphabetical order); Binenbaum, I.; Bondarenko, V.; et al. Enhancement of COPD biological networks using a web-based collaboration interface. F1000Research 2015, 4, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. sbv IMPROVER Project Team and Challenge Best Performers; Namasivayam, A.A.; Morales, A.F.; Lacave, Á.M.; Tallam, A.; Simovic, B.; Alfaro, D.G.; Bobbili, D.R.; Martin, F.; Androsova, G.; et al. Community-reviewed biological network models for toxicology and drug discovery applications. Gene Regul. Syst. Biol. 2016, 10, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) N-Acetylmuramyl-L-Alanyl-D-Isoglutamine (MDP); (b) N-Acetyl-D-Glucosaminyl-(beta1,4)-N Acetylmuramyl-L-Alanyl-D-Isoglutamine (GMDP).
Figure 1. (a) N-Acetylmuramyl-L-Alanyl-D-Isoglutamine (MDP); (b) N-Acetyl-D-Glucosaminyl-(beta1,4)-N Acetylmuramyl-L-Alanyl-D-Isoglutamine (GMDP).
Microorganisms 10 01526 g001
Figure 2. Muramyl peptides activation of various cell populations.
Figure 2. Muramyl peptides activation of various cell populations.
Microorganisms 10 01526 g002
Figure 3. Positive and negative regulation of inflammation by muramyl peptides.
Figure 3. Positive and negative regulation of inflammation by muramyl peptides.
Microorganisms 10 01526 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guryanova, S.V. Regulation of Immune Homeostasis via Muramyl Peptides-Low Molecular Weight Bioregulators of Bacterial Origin. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081526

AMA Style

Guryanova SV. Regulation of Immune Homeostasis via Muramyl Peptides-Low Molecular Weight Bioregulators of Bacterial Origin. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(8):1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081526

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guryanova, Svetlana V. 2022. "Regulation of Immune Homeostasis via Muramyl Peptides-Low Molecular Weight Bioregulators of Bacterial Origin" Microorganisms 10, no. 8: 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081526

APA Style

Guryanova, S. V. (2022). Regulation of Immune Homeostasis via Muramyl Peptides-Low Molecular Weight Bioregulators of Bacterial Origin. Microorganisms, 10(8), 1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081526

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop